View attachment 468271
The Rise of the Romani: Theoretical Migration Patterns of archaic Roma/Romani and the establishment of the Ancient Roman Empire
Presented by Dr. Prof. Darian Iathadan, Dean of History at the Araqon University in Araqon Province, Spain.
"The Origins of the Roman Empire and the Roma in general are one of the most controversial and studied aspects in European History. The historical record in many ways is contradictory and confusing, as much of history is. I'm sure all of you are familiar with the
vivid debates over the personhood and historicity of Confucius. However, scouring the historical record, I have attempted to juxtapose the current theories on the Roma, and attempted to at least platter the current consensus to try to find a pattern in it. (OOC: None of this is explicit canon, feel free to plow over this, this is just a fun little work about potential theories)
The origin of the Roma are extremely,
extremely hard to pin down. All we have really been able to pin down is that the Roma are originally from the Indian subcontinent. However, recent research has significantly narrowed this down to southern India, especially Sri Lanka. Doing my own research, I am preparing to publish a series of theories linking the Roma with the archaic Vedda peoples of Sri Lanka. The Vedda are an ancient remnant population, similar to the
Negritos of the Philippines, and perhaps even predate Dravidian colonization of southern India. Very little is known about them, since in the modern day Vedda are subject to discrimination and repression in the Sri Lankan state, and their culture is giving way to the more universally accepted Tamil and Sinhala society. However, thanks to the reconstruction of the proto-Vedda language achieved by members of this very university, I have been able to find several word pairs and cognates between Roma and Vedda. I have attached a list in Document 2. [
DOCUMENT LOST] Not to mention, the Vedda were just as discriminated against in these archaic times, and thus had plenty of reason to attempt to find a new home.
Therefore, I have tried to pin certain historical events in India to a theoretical migration of a group of Vedda out of Sri Lanka. Figure 1 illustrates potential leads in this regard. (Fig. 1) I must caveat that some of the data used has recently come into conflict. Greek historians in the area recorded a "Despotate of Bidu" near what is the modern-day Rajasthan and Gujarat regions in Northwestern India. However, the historicity of this region has come into question, as no evidence of a powerful unified state as recorded has been uncovered so far. Yet, this is the best reconstruction so far that has been presented, though I will quickly mention theories about an Assamese, central Indian, or even Burman origin of the Roma...
...What is known, however, is that the Roma had to go from India to Europe. This particular migration has been the bane of ethnographers, Romanologists, and historians since Aethelbert of Copenhagen wrote about these things in eons past. It is thought that, not long after emerging from India proper, the Romani went through a kind of bottleneck due to an attack by surrounding kings. Many here know of the story of Sellon the Cowardly, the bastard son of a bastard king who in the Roma's hour of greatest need sacrificed himself to allow a select few Roma to escape destruction. Indeed, in Rome proper, there is a shrine to Sellon near the old Temple of Jupiter where to this day the poor, destitute and lonely leave Yams on the perpetually burning altar in hopes that Sellon would bless them as he blessed the select few. (The survival of this ostensibly pagan shrine through the rule of otherwise rather iconoclast muslims and, later, skeptical Christians is a fascinating story to be told another day.) Regardless of the historicity of Sellon proper, there is significant evidence pointing towards there being a bottleneck, including the "cursed names," families who's lineages died out in a cataclysm long ago.
After this event, there are two prevailing theories as to the paths of migration to Europe by the Roma. One is that the Roma would eventually reach the Steppes and become a great horde, similar to the Absarook would in the Americas, before settling in eastern Europe before the more whole-scale conquest of the vast swathe of territory that would become the Roman empire. The other theory says that they took a southern route through Persia and the middle east. (Fig. 2) However, both of these have major problems. For one, it is assumed that the Roma whole-scale invaded Europe and conquered it. Recent archaeological digs have proven time and time again that there were vibrant and thriving civilizations throughout this area. Thus, all of this has lead me to have a new, groundbreaking theory: The Roma merely co-opted an existing empire, rather than form their own.
The most important aspect of this comes from the linguistic evidence. Even though the Roma were ostensibly the rulers of the whole area, Latin was the language that later spread across Europe. This has traditionally been explained by saying that the Latin soldiers were used as easy shock troops by Roma authorities and were given land grants in return for service, which lead to them settling in the new areas and spreading their language. However, I suggest that the Roma ended up conquering the upper heirarchy of a large Latin empire. From there, Roma quietly mingled but did not integrate with the local societies, with a timescale given in figure 3. (Fig. 3)
This is almost proven by the linguistics of the Roman Empire. Even though the Roman Empire extended from England all the way to Ethiopia, Romance languages are only found in Western Europe. This would be counter-intuitive if the Romani were trying to use Latins as loyal colonists, since the regions of Ethiopia, Persia, Mesopotamia, and the Levant were all far more rebellious for far longer and yet were still unsettled by Latins. Yea, even after the fall of the Northern Roman Empire, the Southern Roman Empire would last for millennia after, even though the Northern Roman Empire has more of these "loyal colonists." An illustration of this is given in figure 4. (Fig. 4)
Therefore, in my next selection of far more formal research papers, I will put forward my new thesis: that Rome was originally a Latin Empire that had it's upper hierarchy couped by what would become the Romani thousands of years ago. I will now take questions.
You, yes! No, this does not diminish the influence of Indian culture on Europe and especially Rome, and it certainly does not negate the good or bad things done by the Romani during their control of the Roman Empire.
You! No, the y-dna haplogroup testing is still in the mail. We will be releasing that paper later on, however.
You. No, I am not still looking for undergrad help. Next question... actually, we're out of time. I have my business card and email at the door, feel free to email me any further questions. Thank you for your time."