I really like how the Soviets are going to a (bit) different course then the Stalinist dystopia of OTL. After all, it wasn't destined to be one. And same applies to the Germans and actually the whole Central and Eastern Europe which were just a large zone of death and misery in the 1900s

That is one of the key elements that I really want to explore with the TL. Socialism, Communism, Anarchism and other primarily left-wing ideologies are incredibly varied and diverse, and the sudden clash over how to bring into ideology into reality is an intensely fascinating question which I wanted to examine.

One thing I would really like to accomplish as well is ensuring that Central Europe remains a concrete geopolitical concept - whereas IOTL, despite post-Cold War efforts, Central and Eastern Europe have ended up lumped together into a single miserable pot.

Well, one thing I really like about this timeline is multiple different socialist states with different ideological basis compared to the Marxist-Leninist mainstream.

Happy to hear you enjoyed that element.

I'm kinda happy, I really liked the Muscovite Communist vision and the narrative flow seemed to point in the direction of a Trotsky power grab. So he falls. I'm curious how world communism is going to evolve this way; it seems like Asian communists will be more likely to follow ITTL Trotskyism, will Italy reconciliate with Russia now that the main responsible of the souring of relations is gone?

There was some fun to playing around with the idea of what a Trotskyite Soviet state would look like, and there was a moment that I was playing around with the idea of going that way. However, Muscovite Communism is really one of the standout elements of the TL and an ideological school of thought I have used a lot of effort in developing so ultimately I decided against things going in Trotsky's favor. The fact that this also leads to the enshrining of Bonapartism as a Crime against the Revolution, and as a result allows me to set a precedent against one-man dictatorships (nothing to prevent a junta, oligarchy or undemocratic committee rule) allows for pretty significant divergences from OTL.

As to Italian Communism, despite the Trotskyites being the key opposition, the relationship between the two states has been greatly harmed and the Muscovite approach to international revolutionary coordination would limit efforts any way. We might see some sort of improved relations in the future, but at this point the well has been pretty well poisoned.

Excellent update! There was so much tension in the Trotsky Affair, well-written and plausible. The outcome looks fairly decent when compared with both OTL and with what a victorious Trotsky might have been up to.

I am very happy to hear it. I really wanted to keep it uncertain which side would win out and how the conflict would resolve itself.

One thing to note is that Trotsky was incredibly influential in the development of international communism and his fall from grace is going to result in a seismic shakeup of the international revolutionary movement.
 
Feature: Three Soviet Leaders
The Trotskyite Affair has provided quite the bombshell, and before @Zulfurium gets down to explore the numerous ripples that will come of this development, it's a good time to sit back and take a breather - although for this Feature, we're staying in Soviet Russia anyway.
One of the strong points of ADiJ for me, when I first discovered it, was the sheer star quality of its cast. So many great, looming personalities from the period have been put in different positions from OTL and have had the chance to rise and fall. Inevitably, as the TL has moved past the Great War, some of these big names have been left by the wayside a bit. Others still have surfaced back up in the TL, but with some gaps in what they've been up to in the preceding years. Zulfurium and I have selected together three prominent Russian names - all of them veterans of previous struggles in some way or another - to illustrate what they've been doing over the past decade of ADiJ, and what their position looks like in the aftermath of the Trotskyite Affair. Hope you enjoy!
As always, if you spot any mistake or factual error, please be so kind as to flag it.

Feature: Three Soviet Leaders

Nestor_Makhno_and_his_Lieutenants%2C_Berdyansk%2C_1919.jpg

Nestor Makhno and affiliated military commanders during the Russian Civil War in 1919, in Berdyansk

The Black Eminence​

Nestor Makhno entered the Russian Civil War a plump, baby-faced youth with only shepherding, painting, and working at an iron foundry as his work experiences. He came out the other side as a lean, weathered, tough revolutionary hero who’d proven himself a natural-born military prodigy, and as a leading face of the anarchist movement around the world.
Ironically, given his significant political standing and his seat in the Central Committee as part of the loosely affiliated anarchist faction, Makhno held no great interest in questions of high politics and the machinery of the Soviet state. This is in part what endeared him to many Soviet citizens, their affection for him almost of a pre-political nature: Makhno remained aloof of the feverish positioning that immediately preceded, and then briefly followed, the Trotskyite Affair. He was consistent in his commitment to the core issues of peasant well-being and local communities, and while his military record during the Civil War loomed large in the public’s mind, over time it was his quiet, pragmatic focus on practical political and organisational questions that came to characterise the latter part of his life. In these efforts, the ongoing working relationship with Sokolnikov proved fundamental, as it allowed the two to get to work on improving the daily lot of Soviet citizens – with an attention to minority questions and farmer problems that still represented a bit of a blind spot for more conventional Russian communists. It also compensated for Makhno’s eminent weakness – most of his experience with self-organisation had been limited to Ukraine, and the partnership with Sokolnikov allowed for a smoother transition to applying the lessons learnt in Ukraine to a national scale. (1)

Particularly in Siberia, where the violence and scale of the fighting, combined with the harsh terrain and the weakness of the preceding White regime had greatly upended traditional patterns of life and changed the face of the countryside, Makhno and Sokolnikov had their work cut out for them. The local farming and mining communities offered, on the one hand, an exciting opportunity to experiment with anarchism – but on the other hand, they presented a challenge for the government to reassert control over, and their long-term viability remained an open question without large investment coming in from the political leadership. Immediate action was politically impossible with Trotsky’s star higher than ever following the Siberian campaign – not to mention the fact that internal displacement of farmers during the multiple stages of the Civil War had made even censuses a complicated and inaccurate proposition in the initial phases after reunification. While Lazar Kaganovich was eventually able to make inroads, and paved the way for future integration of the local economy into the wider socialist system with an energetic campaign of confiscation, the actual job of making something coherent out of the scattered Siberian communes fell to Makhno. In an inventive scheme meant to boost micro-loans, therefore, massive newly confiscated tracts of land served as collateral to local investment: the credit would go towards establishing public utilities in villages, but with an eye to the long term, it also allowed farmers to receive technical training, acquaint themselves with more efficient farming techniques, and purchase or loan mechanised equipment. The hope was that, in the long term, this would harmonise Siberian farming activities with those in the rest of the country – with cooperative enterprise acting in concert with communal institutions to create a closely supervised market of agricultural goods. This also allowed for the production, testing, and deployment of industrial resource extraction machinery – a development which was to become relevant in the future. Land reform accelerated rapidly in the wake of Trotsky’s execution, with Makhno finding himself overtaken by the very system that had been holding him back – as undoing the experience of the past became a way for the Soviet Republic to try and banish the spectre of Civil War-era divisions for good. (2)

These efforts greatly absorbed the majority of Makhno’s time. A good portion of the rest was dedicated to his daughter, Yelena, and to his wife, Halyna Kuzmenko – herself a veteran of the revolution, and an anarchist, although much more of a Ukrainian nationalist than Makhno himself, and still chafed by the continued separation of the majority of Ukraine from the Soviet Republic. Makhno never publicly commented on the Don Republic ruling over the lands he’d spent the majority of the Civil War in, and when not working on local Siberian communities, he devoted himself to the development of anarchist political theory. (3) The complex reality of Russian peasant life provided him with considerable grounds for political experimentation, but also with serious stress-tests to his ideology. Being in favour of local self-rule sounded relatively uncomplicated in principle, but traditional Russian peasant life was often brutal, extremely prescriptive, and surprisingly authoritarian – with harsh corporal punishments and strong internal hierarchies. A villager himself, Makhno was well acquainted with the less palatable side of village life, and how it didn’t fit with either anarchist theory or the practical wishes of the Central Committe. The dislocation of the preceding two decades allowed Makhno more grounds for reform, and over time Makhno developed his so-called platformist framework, which set out to organise local self-government along anarchical principles. Platformism focused on four key principles: tactical unity, that is to say, anarchist movements had to adopt consistent tactics to maximise their influence in the wide and diverse environment of the far left, and local self-governing units had to remain cohesive and consistent in their policymaking, to avoid opening a flank to centralisation efforts from the Central Committee – a position that revealed some of Makhno’s anxiety that another Trotsky might come again in the future, or that perhaps Sverdlov would eventually overreach, as the Governing Clique greatly strengthened itself in the aftermath of the Affair. This went hand in hand with theoretical unity – anarchist activists and communities had to educate themselves about theory before concerning with practice, so as to maintain an independent identity in the cauldron of leftist political experimentation. Collective responsibility warned off against individual revolutionaries making rash decisions that could harm the entire movement – hardly a controversial position in leftist politics following Trotsky’s rise and fall. Finally, federalism was to square off the need for service to the revolutionary cause with the principle of self-governing, and was to be guarded as a key part of the Soviet system against all comers. After some initial confusion related to the term “collective responsibility”, which looked distinctly un-anarchist to some, Makhno clarified the consensus-based nature of such a responsibility, reinforcing the need for local communities where individuals could meaningfully participate in the communal aspect of society and policymaking. This clarification took place across an increasingly healthy correspondence with Malatesta and Gramsci – perhaps the one avenue where the Italian People’s Republic and a member of the Soviet Central Committee saw eye to eye. In a sense, platformism developed just in time – for soon after its achievement of political maturity, the anarchist faction ceased all meaningful opposition to the Governing Clique. By then, local communities in Siberia, and anarchist activists in the political system, had the theoretical tools and political results to stand on their own feet. (4)

Footnotes:

(1) This is a rehash of what Makhno has previously been up to in the course of the TL. Useful to get our bearings, but also to explore the enigmatic, aloof qualities that make Makhno such a popular figure – here is a man whose commitment to the revolution, as opposed to his own aggrandisement and benefit, cannot be doubted by anybody.

(2) Zulfurium and I have used a lot of words to describe what the agricultural “communal market” of ITTL Soviet Russia looks like, but there’s still massive disparity within the country. There’s the complicated legacy of Yekaterinburg, of course, but then there’s also the bewildering complexity of Siberia, where distance, isolation, and self-reliance sometimes undermine communities – and other times prove to be virtues instead. Thankfully, the overabundance of land can be turned into an asset to support Moscow’s new micro-loan and utilities plan for rural regions, and local self government need not be a weakness if properly channeled – although Makhno’s ability to control these developments is in question. You still won’t get indoor plumbing in Siberia any time soon, but this positively transforms Russian villages, making them much more livable places connected to the outside world.

(3) Makhno developed Platfortism IOTL as a member of the Russian exile community in Paris. Some aspects of his political thinking are obviously retained ITTL – such as his relative indiffeence to the Ukrainian national question. It might seem odd, but ultimately Makhno sees revolutionary upheavals as a chance to improve the lot of peasants and workers – he feels sorry that people in the Don are missing on the opportunity, but it’s a question of justice not nationality. If he retains some special sentimentality for “his” lands that are now in the Don, that’s not something he displays in public.
Other aspects of the ideology will obviously change, as it’s being formed under radically different circumstances.

(4) OTL, Platformism became a way for outnumbered groups of anarchists to have oversized influence among the proletariat. ITTL, it’s about retaining identity even in the flux of tent pole party politics – a particularly pressing concern following the dissolution of the Anarchist Clique into the Governing Clique in the aftermath of the Trotskyite Affair. Moreover, whereas IOTL platformism primarily addresses activist groups, ITTL it’s meant as a tool for local (and particularly Siberian) communities to demonstrate their ability to rule themselves, and their economic viability – to protect them from possible centralist impulses on the part of the government in Moscow. The correspondence with Malatesta and subsequent clearing of the air is OTL, although ITTL I threw in Gramsci for good measure – he’ll be very interested in the kind of work Makhno has been doing.

1200px-Antonov-rusia--russianbolshevik00rossuoft.png

Vladimir Antonov-Ovseenko in his office at the Commissariat of the Inspectorate

The Unlikely Commissar​

For Vladimir Antonov-Ovseenko, the years between the Civil War and the Trotskyite Affair were a time of promise unfulfilled. One of the most gifted intellectuals in the exceptional cadre of pre-Great-War revolutionaries, and one of the key commanders during the internecine conflict thanks to his military college education – present at all battles on the Southern Front side by side with Nestor Makhno, save for a brief bout of mental illness which temporarily removed him from the front lines – Ovseenko had spent the subsequent decade as Commissar of the Inspectorate, a position he won thanks to Sverdlov’s faith in him, and which made him part of the vast submerged security infrastructure which now ramified across the Soviet state, with Sverdlov at the head. (1) A strong believer in party democracy, and fully onboard with the tent pole approach adopted by the Soviet Republic, Ovseenko tried to take citizen complaints seriously, and turned auditing of state institutions into a specialised field with a sophisticated rulebook – but he went up against two fundamental limits, one administrative, the other political. For one, the Commissariat he led had no enforcement authority or true administrative power. The auditing was merely advisory, informing the GBU when organs when state actors, public officials, and private entities failed to comply with the law. The Commissariat might be part of Sverdlov’s shadowy edifice, but it inevitably played second fiddle to such enforcement institutions. Politically, Ovseenko experienced a degree of isolation – while a believer in party democracy, he often reserved scathing criticism for the extent to which a market economy had been allowed to take root alongside the socialist way of life in the Soviet Republic. While in this respect he aligned somewhat with Trotsky’s own command economy positions, he remained fiercely loyal to Sverdlov and steered well clear of Trotskyites and formal political activism in general, devoting himself to his legal work. (5)

This distance served him in good stead: as Trotskyites all over the country got arrested en masse, and the question of military leadership had risen to an acute pitch following the incident with the 32nd Rifle Division, senior party members suddenly remembered that Ovseenko had been a talented military commander before developing his impressive legal expertise. Most fundamentally, Ovseenko had an excellent qualification at this juncture – he still held Sverdlov’s trust. Virtually overnight, Ovseenko found himself catapulted into a position of great responsibility, as Military Governor of the Yekaterinburg district – his job being primarily to ensure troop loyalty and security in the region, while working with select Central Committee members, such as Makhno and Sokolnikov, on the re-harmonisation and final integration of Yekaterinburg into the Republic.
Upon returning to Moscow, following the stabilisation of Yekaterinburg and the arrest of the eminent Trotskyites still active in the region, Ovseenko received his reward: a Central Committee seat, which to many commentators finally righted an old wrong by acknowledging the veteran revolutionary’s contribution to the birth and growth of the Soviet state. There was more to come for Ovseenko, now that the old hero of the revolution was finally catapulted back to the very front of the revolutionary stage: he was entrusted with the post of Commissar of Justice, where his decade of practice auditing the Soviet administration would result in renewed anti-corruption drives. (6)

Footnotes:

(5) Again setting the stage for divergences to come. This might seem like a sad fate for one of the most prominent revolutionaries in the old Russian Empire, but it’s miles ahead of his OTL fate – with his opposition to Stalinism and authoritarian tendences, as well as his support for Trotsky in the succession, getting him sacked. After a brief diplomatic stint he ended up working in the legal field much as ITTL, but was arrested during the purges of 1937 and eventually shot. ITTL, his country is kinder to him – and the butterflies distance him more from Trotsky than was the case IOTL. He still ends up with a good job as Sverdlov’s trusted collaborator, mind. It’s just less glamorous than such a prominent revolutionary might rightfully deserve.

(6) A man’s loss is another man’s gain. The sudden need for reliable, Sverdlov-affiliated officers with considerable experience is a significant windfall for Ovseenko, who first gets appointed as Military Governor in Yekaterinburg and then, after clearing up the house and paving the way for civilian government, gets a seat on the Central Committee. How he will use it, especially now that opposition is no longer viable in the CC and his close alignment with Sverdlov, is an open question – but there’s no doubt that his combination of military talent, legal and administrative training, and sheer experience dating back to the revolution of 1905 makes him a senior trustworthy figure in the Soviet government.

686px-Alexandra_Kollontai.jpg

A young Alexandra Kollontai

The Web-Weaver in Moscow​

A surprising mixture of economic radicalism and political moderation, Alexandra Kollontai could rightfully claim to be one of the architects of Soviet Russia’s success – her contributions starting all the way back with the revolution of 1905. In many ways, Kollontai appeared to contemporary commentators as a coin with two radically different sides: one was the firm and unwavering critiquer of the “bourgeois infiltrations” which in her opinion characterised Sokolnikov’s economic policies. The other was the indefatigable Commissar for welfare, who worked closely with Sokolnikov himself to implement policy and make sure ordinary Soviet citizens benefited from revolutionary policies. Kollontai was more than capable of firebrand speeches – not for nothing her denunciation of Trotsky as the would-be Russian Bonaparte immediately defined her public perception – but she was also a moderate in the Central Committee, doling out her support on a case by case issue without putting in a systematic effort to stop the centripetal impulses of Soviet governance following the Trotskyite Affair. (7)

Two things about Kollontai were clear to all, however: she possessed an iron-willed commitment to make women full Soviet citizens, engaged in – and mobilised for – the future of their country, with their emancipation being treated as a package offer, inseparable from wider questions of welfare. And her activities as a socialite in Moscow made her the key for anyone wishing to network with the cadre of Soviet political leaders. A gifted conversationalist with a talent for languages, first-hand experience with activism in other countries, and at the heart of a dense web of connections, Kollontai functioned as a social gatekeeper for party functionnaires at the highest level – accruing influence without rocking the boat of the Central Committee. If Kollontai showed up at the premiere of a new Proletkult movie, then state and party media knew to pay attention. Her polyglot disposition made her the darling of the foreign press whenever they were left looking for an explanation to the complex political developments taking place in Russia. Her access and friendship to many powerful figures – such as Polina Zhemchuzhina and her husband, Molotov – allowed Kollontai to cautiously dole out access to the halls of power, by introducing people whenever convenient – gathering considerable clout and an informal network of favours in exchange. There was more to her than political intelligence and the right business cards, however: at the heart of Kollontai’s influence was her position as Commissar for Welfare. If the addition of a government portfolio was a boon to anyone vying for influence in Moscow, the specific nature of welfare allowed Kollontai to play to her strengths. A word in the ear of Lunacharsky – and later on, Bogdanov – could create significant ripples in the coordination between Kollontai’s welfare portfolio and the Commissariat for Education. It’s important to emphasise the degree to which literacy recovery and general education was effectively a form of welfare provision to many adults in the Soviet Republic, with the impressive results finally mending the deep social and economic wounds of the Civil War. In this context, as Commissar for Welfare, Kollontai stood at the critical intersection between Sokolnikov’s economic domain and education policies. Moreover, the implementation of welfare politics often served as a useful barometre for the popular mood, giving Kollontai an often underestimated role in both analysing and nudging public opinion, and perception of the benefits of life in a communist society. All of this built up to combine a serious ability to influence Soviet politics. While this won her many friends – some true, some of convenience – her ceaseless activism and constant agitation for women’s inclusion and participation in the construction of Soviet society rubbed many colleagues the wrong way. Whether slamming her influence, her seeming ability to easily blend in with foreigners – a relevant source of suspicion in the increasingly tense international climate following the Trotskyite Affair – or simply adopting rancorous chauvinistic views to her gender, critics of Kollontai abounded in Soviet high society. Nevertheless, her position was safe, nonetheless due to her undisputable loyalty to the party. Kollontai’s ability to efficiently implement policies she personally disagreed with, and her inclination to go with the flow in the Central Committee rather than challnge the power of the Governing Clique, kept her on Sverdlov’s good side – and ensured that the notoriety of the woman who shouted “Bonaparte!” in Trotsky’s face never presented a threat to the stability of the Central Committee. (8)

Footnotes:

(7) This description is apparently full of contradictions – but it isn’t. It’s at the heart of who Kollontai was IOTL as well, even though circumstances here are vastly different. The key thing to understand about her character is that Kollontai was simultaneously not afraid to speak her mind, but ultimately loyal to the party first and foremost, putting in the energy and commitment to implement policy even when she disagreed with it. Whether this is to be interpreted as positive loyalty or personal hypocrisy is not for me to judge, but it is undeniable that IOTL this was brought to rather extreme lengths, as Kollontai got repeatedly put on trial for “indiscipline”, risking Trotsky’s wrath and then Stalin’s, until she eventually just gave up on the cause of women’s emancipation and retreated from outspoken opposition to the regime. Here, the situation is much more favourable, allowing her to get more of what she wants – but only to some degree, and particularly on the economy, where her views are very different to Sokolnikov’s, she is forced to make compromises she views as inevitably painful and bourgeois.

(8) OTL, Kollontai survived Stalin. ITTL, she can definitely survive Sverdlov. Indeed, she ends up thriving as one of the most influential socialites in Moscow, to say nothing of her Commissariat portfolio and Central Committee seat. OTL, Kollontai found herself shifted to the diplomatic service as Stalin attempted to remove her from any position where she might do damage to his centripetal trajectory – she was only the third woman in history to serve in an official diplomatic capacity, and soon discovered she was very good at the job. Her talent for languages and conversations made her one of the OTL USSR’s most respected diplomats abroad. ITTL, she never gets the chance to find out about her surprising diplomatic skills – but she does get to devote her intellectual power to women’s emancipation and welfare, all the while working closely with other Commissars, and particularly Sokolnikov, which expands her influence well beyond the official purview of her portfolio. Ultimately, her loyalty to the party, commitment to the decision-making of the Central Committee regardless of the outcome, and relative acquiescence with the Governing Clique guarantee that she will maintain her influential network, even as life gets harder in the aftermath of the Trotskyite Affair. The “years of innocence” might be over for the ITTL Soviet Republic, but whatever comes next, Kollontai will be there to witness it – and influence it, if she can.

End note: I hope you enjoyed this look into some rather veteran names of the timeline! I look forward to revisiting some other big names from multiple countries and see how much their lives have changed since the end of the Great War. If there's anyone you'd like to see featured, Zulfurium and I are all ears! Thanks again to him for hosting my content here on the TL. Looking forward to discussing the material with you all, and please stay safe.
 
Update Thirty-Three (Pt. 2): A Theory of Great Men
A Theory of Great Men

Red_Army_in_Tbilisi_Feb_25_1921.jpg

Don Army Prepares For Invasion of Georgia

The Hydra Consumes Itself​

The years between the Siberian Campaign and Trotsky's Fall were a time of bitter troubles for the Don Republic. Already a politically divided state with a tenuous sense of national sovereignty and identity, the consolidation of the Soviet Republic and its shift from peaceful co-existence to violent expansionism was to result in a precipitous radicalisation of Don politics as the old guard of the Kadets, Liberal Democrats and Conservatives were increasingly sidelined politically by radical forces. At the same time, both the Council of Generals and the Duma began to press for an expansion of their powers and authorities while separatist sentiments rose precipitously, particularly within the Ukrainian population, which felt that government from Rostov made little sense when the vast majority of the state's population and land area were in the Ukraine.

Ukraine had slowly stitched itself together after the Civil War was brought to a close, and in the process had seen what could only be described as a cultural and societal renaissance as artists, poets and writers began to rise to prominence by the hundreds. Coming out of the lower classes, the traditional social structures having been shattered during the Great War, Revolution and Civil War, these artists rarely had the benefits of a systemic education, caused by privation, war, famine and the need to earn a living in order to survive, but by working on the brink of what was possible, getting acquainted with world culture and imbuing their works with the latest trends in order to create artworks at the very front edge of modernity, they were allowed to experience an impressive growth in popularity - their novels being translated into foreign languages and artworks sold for small fortunes at international auctions by the end of the decade. The main building blocks of their art were a constant quest for independence, both national and independent, as well as a belief in their own idealisation of an independent Ukraine. Numerous literary organisations flourished across much of the Ukraine during this time, seeking to develop a new Ukrainian literature to separate them from their mostly Russian rulers in the Don while they set up schools to teach basic literacy in the Ukrainian language and script.

While the Ukrainians never truly made much of an effort to participate in the Don government, the same could not be said for the leadership in the Don's attitude towards the Ukraine. A platform aimed at securing Ukrainian buy-in to the Don regime was a consistent part of the party planks of all three mainstream parties, and was further backed by both the Young Russians and Union of Monarchists, while the National Union used this open pandering to the Ukrainians to bolster their support amongst the Russian population of the Republic instead. This support for Ukrainian nationalism, if not Ukrainian separatism, saw the appointment of primarily Ukrainian officials to all parts of the government apparatus within the Ukraine itself while the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church was allowed to operate independently of the Russian Orthodox Church which ruled in the rest of the Don, to the considerable protests of the remnants of the Russian church hierarchy.

In the Duma, politics were marred by constant horse-trading and pork-barreling when not consumed by bad faith infighting and denunciations, an increasingly endemic issue as the more radical parties secured a rapidly growing following amongst an ever more disillusioned public. Elections held in 1930 saw the three mainstream parties all lose significant levels of support, with particularly the Union of Monarchists and Russian National Union gaining ground while Ukrainian separatists lost some of the steam which they had been gathering to their cause near the end of the Civil War.

It was also during these years that the various Émigré factions increasingly began to return to the Don Republic, the emigrés finding themselves increasingly unwelcome in Great Britain, France and Germany as Western and Central Europe increasingly turned their thoughts towards domestic affairs. However, in the relative quiet which followed the Siberian Conquest the alarmist tones taken by the Don radicals which had been seeing so much success were increasingly met with skepticism. As the national backers of the mainstream parties fell into political turmoil, as occurred in France, colonial troubles, as was the case for both France and Britain, or realigned their support towards the Soviet Republic, as was the case with the Germans, the influence and interest of foreign powers in Don politics weakened. The Two Rivers Crisis saw the British withdraw entirely from the Don Republic while the Indochinese Revolt drew ever more French resources away from the region over the course of the decade.

It was this precipitous reduction in resources, particularly in the form of foreign investments, which was to spur the Council of Generals to action. Having received warnings of a new budget which would slash significant parts of the Don military in favor of civilian spending, the generals chose to push for military action so as to demonstrate their importance to the Republic and the resultant need for continued military spending. After some consideration the focus eventually turned towards the reconquest of Georgia - the long-held ambitions of General Boris Shteifo, who had served on the Caucasian Front during the Great War and had since sought to formulate a plan for the recapture of the lost Russian domains in the Caucasus.

At a meeting of the Council of Generals, General Yevgeny Miller, both an ally and rival of the influential General Nikolai Yudenich, set forth a proposal to press forward with Shteifon's plans. After some debate this proposal began to gain steam, with the youthful General Alexander Rodzyanko, nephew to the prominent politician Mikhail Rodzyanko, leading the younger generals in supporting the measure and in the process secured support from the Liberal Democrats and their Conservative allies for the measure - this being sufficient to prevent any Duma veto of the plans as the two parties held 36% of the seats in the Duma combined. Thus, on the 17th of September 1932 the Council of Generals voted in favor of an invasion of Georgia, securing more than the two-thirds support needed to keep the neutered Wrangel from vetoing the measure. Two days later, on the 19th, the measure was passed by the Duma, with the National Union, Liberal Democrats and Conservatives all voting in favor. The Don Republic was going to war (17).

The Democratic Republic of Georgia had been in a precarious position since its inception, surrounded on all sides by powers more than willing to absorb it and reliant upon the mutual distrust of those neighbours to make the maintenance of a buffer state worthwhile. Formed from a union of various Georgian and regional minority parties, the Georgian state had been established at the tail end of the Great War with a promise of aid and protection from the German Empire, a fact which was to endear the Germans to the Georgians for decades to come.

Notably, the leadership of the young state was originally drawn primarily from the Social Democratic Party of Georgia, formed primarily from the renamed Georgian Mensheviks, who had dominated politics in the region since before the 1905 Revolution, but saw the adoption of an actual functioning multi-party democracy soon after it established its independence. While the Social Democrats would secure 81.5% of the vote in the first elections, held on the 14th of February 1919, opposition parties such as the right-wing National Democratic Party and center-right Georgian Socialist-Federalist Revolutionary Party soon emerged to contest the elections alongside minority Ossetian, Armenian, Azeri, Abkhazian and Russian parties and eventually a Communist Party of Georgia, although there was considerable debate in the Constituent Assembly of Georgia before the party was allowed entry into the parliament in 1927. Nevertheless, for the duration of the 1920s it was the Social Democratic Party which dominated political affairs.

Early in its existence, the young republic was faced with a series of major challenges. First of all was the matter of securing international recognition, a task handed over to the talented diplomat Irakli Tsereteli who attended the Copenhagen Conference and oversaw the recognition of Georgian independence. This was soon followed by troubled ethnic relations. While an ambitious land reform program was well handled by the Social Democratic government and a series of judicial reforms and the implementation of local self-government programmes for various minorities were undertaken, the Georgians were nevertheless forced to deal with near-constant uprisings, particularly amongst the Ossetians and to a lesser extent the Abkhazians, while the Social Democratic Party itself saw a gradual shift in ideology away from internationalist revolutionary socialism in favor of a more nationalistic social democracy increasingly modelled on the German SPD.

Georgia had found itself under threat from their White neighbors to the north on multiple occasions, fighting a series of border conflicts during the Russian Civil War with little to show from it other than a couple bodies and increased hostility on either side. To the south the Ottomans initially proved a constant aggressor along the borders, as the Pan-Turianism of the CUP urged the Muslim major power to contest for rule of the Caucasus, although the Ottomans increasingly found themselves more occupied by events in Central Asia and then Kurdish Iran more so than matters in Georgia. With Kemal Pasha's rise to power matters finally began to settle down, allowing for peace on the southern border. Hundreds of laws were passed by the various the Presidents of the Constituent Assembly early in the life of the republic, on topics ranging from citizenship, local elections, defence and the official state language to agriculture, the legal system, a national system of public education, fiscal and monetary policies, railway legislation as well as several industrial programmes for foreign trade and domestic production.

In 1921, in the face of a threatened invasion by the Ottoman Empire, the Georgians established a modern constitution on which the state was to be run for the next decade and a bit. During this period, the Georgian state was led by the position of Chairman of the Government as chief executive, an appointed office, on a one-year term, with the post not held by any single individual for more than two consecutive terms. This resulted in something of a revolving door at the top, as Social Democratic Chairmen spent a year or two in power at most before returning to the fold, rarely having the time to put their individual stamp on the Georgian state. Furthermore, as elections in 1922, 1925 and 1928 saw the emergence of rival parties to power, the fight over who should sit as chairman grew increasingly intense. The first non-Social Democratic Chairman was to be Ioseb Bratashvili of the Socialist-Federalists in an alliance with several minority parties in 1927, who set out to make the Georgian state more inclusive towards minorities, pressing for greater representation in the Constituent Assembly, while also pushing for more conservative limitations on the Social Democratic reforms of the preceding two years.

The period between 1925 and 1927 had seen increasing divisions emerge within the Social Democratic Party as Tsereteli grew increasingly dissatisfied at the nationalistic character the party had adopted, having begun campaigning for Georgia to join the Third International in the aftermath of the Treaty of Tsarskoye Selo as a way of demonstrating the Georgian state's commitment to the international revolutionary cause. This had resulted in bitter intra-party conflict which pushed the Social Democrats ever further to the left, proposing and implementing increasingly radical policies which gradually alienated their more centrist supporters. This would ultimately result in the splintering of the party and the formation of the Communist Party by Tsereteli in 1927, with Bratashvili sweeping in to exploit the momentary weakening of the Social Democrats to secure the top post.

Bratashvili's rule would only last for a year, but inaugurated a period of constantly shifting political allegiance as a Social Democratic administration was replaced by Liberal Democrats under Zurab Avalishvili, a wildly popular party formed in 1924 by Avalishvili, who in turn gave way to National Democrats under Spiridon Kedia, before shifting back to the Liberal Democrats. In the five years between 1927 and 1932, all four parties would hold power non-consecutively as the political scene grew ever more chaotic and no Chairman was able to find the support needed to pass anything more complex than basic budget extensions.

As 1932 dawned, support surged suddenly for the Communist Party, marking the rise of a fifth major political party to the heights of Georgian politics. Once again demonstrating a remarkably adept political mind, Tsereteli was able to secure appointment as Chairman with the cautious support of the Social Democrats. Tsereteli would follow a policy of rapprochement with the Khivan Khanate, viewing them as a decent first step on the road to rebuilding diplomatic relations with the Soviet Republic and wider Communist community. It was in part Tsereteli's appointment, as well as the internal pressures in Rostov, which ultimately led to the widespread support for the invasion of Georgia in the Don Republic (18).

The invasion force prepared by the Don generals numbered some 40,000 infantry, 5,000 cavalry and a smattering of mostly Civil War-era armaments, with the exception of two companies of French Char D1 tanks in addition and a pre-existing collection of old but well-maintained Renault FT-17s. They massed at Yektaterinodar, near the mouth of the Kuban River, under the command of General Yevgeny Miller, lacking a better avenue of attack. Largely a scraping together of whatever units were immediately available and unnecessary to keep the Soviet Republic in check, the force lacked much in the way of coordination and only contained two regiments' worth of veterans primarily serving in the cavalry and artillery while the rest of their force consisted of recently drummed up conscripts.

By contrast, the Georgians had significantly increased its military budget in 1930 under Spiridon Kedia's National Democrats, buying the recently developed Škoda ST vz. 28 tank and Krupp artillery guns to supplement their large volunteer National Guard - who relied on domestically produced of the Bohemian vz. 24 Rifle, while their elite forces were mostly armed with the semi-automatic self-loading ZH-32 Rifle. While the Georgian forces numbered barely 15,000 in all, they were well trained and exceedingly motivated with a strong understanding of the mountainous terrain which dominated their country. Supplementing this force were nearly 20,000 irregulars, who streamed to recruiting centers and were formed into rough militia companies, given a lighting-speed training course, armed with military surplus and placed under the command of self-appointed officers and regulars appointed to serve as NCOs. Commanding this force was the dauntless Giorgi Kvinitadze who, despite having resigned his position as Commander-in-Chief of the Georgian National Guard no less than seven times in the last decade, only to be reappointed by the next Chairman, was highly respected and had played a fundamental role in developing the National Guard into the modern military force it was by the time of the invasion. Serving as Commander of the 1st Army was Giorgi Maznaishvili, an ardent nationalist who had led the repulse of several earlier Turkish and Don attacks on the border and was considered one of the most talented commanders in Georgian employ.

The invasion, word of which had reached the Georgian government almost the day after it was agreed to by the Duma, finally came under way after more than a month's delay on the 22nd of October, proceeding from Yekaterinodar to the coast, before following the coastal road south towards the famous holiday resort at Sochi. It was along this coastal road that the first clashes between the Georgians and Don Whites occurred, as the brazen Colonel Kaikhosro Cholokashvili led his regiment of regulars and two regiments of irregulars, numbering around 6,000 in all, in ambushing the Don advanced guard and boobytrapping the Don Whites' line of advance while taking to the mountains the moment they faced slightest sign of organised opposition. This greatly slowed the advance, allowing the rest of the army to establish a series of defensive lines, the first of which was situated at Sokhumi. It would take nearly a month for the advancing invasion force to reach these lines, during which time the entire town had been turned into a fortress, bordering on a mountainous wilderness swarming with Cholokashvili's soldiers to the north, further reinforced by another regiment of irregulars, and the Black Sea to the south.

The dispatch of the Don Republic's Black Sea Fleet, including the massive Battleship General Alekseyev, saw the bombardment of Sokhumi, significantly tearing up the fortifications and temporarily blowing a hole in a section of the defences, but soon saw the fleet's withdrawal when a night attack on the 14th of November by Georgian torpedo boats resulted in the Cruiser Almaz's hull being breached and the Destroyers Derzky and Pylkiy being sunk in return for half a dozen flimsy torpedo boats. Already skeptical of the invasion plan, Admiral Mikhail Kedrov, Chief of the Don Admiralty, ordered the fleet to return to port in Sevastopol while Almaz was repaired, Kedrov feeling that little had been gained from this reckless project.

The arrival of the Don invasion force at Sokhumi, where Mazniashvili was commanding, would result in the main clash of the invasion as the Don conscripts were thrown at the prepared defences while the Don cavalry waited in the rear for word of a breakthrough they could exploit. For nearly a week, the Don conscripts were pressed forward, clearing one line of defenses in the face of fierce machinegun fire and bombardment by artillery guns, before being driven back by the spirited defenders. With little chance of breakthrough apparent, General Miller turned to his tanks to force a hole, in the process initiating the first major tank engagement of the 1930s. Occurring after the initial infantry clashes, on the 4th of December, the engagement came about when the Don Whites attacked the northern end of the line, where the rocky ground resulted in shallower trenches, with their Char-D1s. While they initially ran through any opposition, losing a couple tanks to artillery bombardment, they soon found themselves faced with a Georgian armoured counter-attack. Clashing with the Georgian ST-28s, the first such clash between the two tank types, the weaknesses of the Char-D1 soon became apparent as the reasoning behind their low cost, the inferior quality of steel used to produce the tank, resulted in the Char-D1s crumbling under the guns of the ST-28s - whose own well-armoured turrets repelled more than one Char-D1 shell in the close-range engagement and ran roughshod over the old FT-17s which had been dispatched to follow the Char-D1s. Urged on by their aggressive commander, Valiko Jugheli, the ST-28s were soon trundling towards the Don Whites' positions, chasing the retreating enemy tank companies into the enemy positions. Acting swiftly, Mazniashvili ordered an all-out assault in response to Jugheli's attacks, which soon saw the entire line erupt in gun and artillery fire. Caught completely by surprise at the sudden counter-attack, the Don Whites were driven back in confusion, the conscripts soon abandoning their posts en masse as panic and exhaustion reached the boiling point. Hunted, the Don White invasion force collapsed into utter chaos, with General Miller caught up in the chaos and killed and Alexander Rodzyanko retreated with the cavalry in good order, having never come close enough to exchange fire with the enemy, while General Shteifon was captured.

While Cholokashvili and his men continued to hound the retreating force, Tsereteli dispatched Avalishvili, a more palatable choice to deal with the Don Whites than Tsereteli himself or any of his supporters, a talented diplomat in his own right, to negotiate a resolution of the conflict. Ultimately, the Don Whites would accept war guilt and pledge a modest sum of money in reparations in early March - the Two Rivers Crisis and renewed Persian Civil War having worsened tensions in the south far beyond anything that either party could have expected at the outset of their own short-lived conflict. The Don Invasion of 1933 was also to prove critical a catalyst for change in Georgia, which soon saw the Chairman's term of office increased from one to three years while the two-term limit was maintained - it having been viewed as a necessary change to prevent a leadership vacuum from emerging during the negotiations with the Don Whites (19).

The Invasion of Georgia was an unmitigated disaster for the Don military as a political institution, making clear the dangers of an overly independent and politically motivated military. While there had been plenty of support for the invasion within the Duma when the invasion was first proposed, the moment word spread of the disaster at Sokhumi they were quick to disavow their support. As so often in the past, victory, or at least the belief in it, had many fathers while defeat was orphaned. While General Miller, dead and thus unable to muster a defense, was portrayed as the primary architect of the entire scheme, the numerous other generals who had backed up around the plan, and the Council of Generals as a whole, struggled to avoid the stain of the disaster. With the military seeing a precipitous loss of prestige, the civilian government began to press ever more for their removal from political authority - seeking to secure full political power for the civilian government.

Spearheading this effort was Pavel Milyukov and his Kadets, who had succeeded in avoiding blowback from the Georgian Invasion, and Pyotr Wrangel himself. Having been prevented from exercising his veto on what Wrangel had always believed was a bad bet, the Don leader sought to use the opportunity presented to him as a chance to reign in the military and solidify his hold on authority. However, as the ostensible head of government and Commander-in-Chief of the Military, Wrangel found it difficult to avoid association with the debacle, particularly when his long-time rival, Nikolai Yudenich, sought to shift the blame away from the Council of Generals. The return of the invasion force, having lost all of its artillery and tanks, down three quarters of its infantry to deaths and desertion but with an almost completely intact cavalry, in mid-January further enflamed tensions as efforts to place the blame and to find a proper scapegoat continued, with Alexander Rodzyanko in particular proving a vocal proponent of shifting responsibility onto Wrangel. This approach met with the support of Alexander's own uncle, Mikhail, and the Liberal Democrats who wanted to distance themselves from the decision, weaken the authority of Wrangel and the Council of Generals while strengthening civilian government.

However, international events were to play their role in these efforts as well when the Persian Civil War was reignited by the Iranian invasion of Pessian Persia, supported by the Soviet government. This renewed the panicked attitudes which had consumed the Don Republic after the fall of Siberia and led to a rallying-to-the-flag effect for Wrangel, who was still acknowledged as one of the few men capable of protecting their fragile republic from the Red menace. The result was that Wrangel was able to shed most of the blame for the invasion and the Council of Generals shouldering the majority of the burden in his place. The Council of Generals had originally been established as a counter to Wrangel, but had proven itself unsuited to the task, leading the Kadets to ally with the Monarchists and National Union to abolish the institution, in a move bitterly criticised by the Conservatives who had come to rely on their alliance with the military for support following the loss of their French backing.

It was during this period that the National Union came to view Wrangel as their chosen leader, no matter how opposed he was to their ideological position, and as the only man capable of standing up to the Soviets (20). Viewing the gradual fading of the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats as an opportunity to expand their following, the Union of Monarchists would extend an invitation to Kiril Vladimirovich Romanov and his family to return to Russian soil - although without a crown for the time being. A measure prepared by the European Romanov faction of the party, it met with bitter opposition from the Siberian wing of the party and led them to extend their own invitation to Anastasia Romanova and her wards, most significantly the young claimant Nikolai Ungern-Romanov, to settle in the Don Republic. To understand the sheer rancor which had seeped into the intra-Romanov feud it is necessary to understand the sheer desperate straits in which the Siberian Romanovs had found themselves in the four years between the Fall of Siberia and their arrival in the Don Republic.

On arrival in Paris, Anastasia had felt it necessary to maintain a cordial relationship with her cousin Kiril, meeting with him on a regular basis and joining him for various events. However, Kiril had come to interpret this as a quiet acquiescence to his claim on the Russian throne, a belief which he made no attempt to keep quiet about, loudly forcing Anastasia to parade her nephew and nieces before gawking supporters of the European Romanovs at Kiril's various luxurious parties. At the same time, the extensive web of support that the Siberian Whites had been able to develop in the United States gradually began to fall apart as American interests turned towards domestic politics and the plight of rich Russian aristocrats began to lose its charm. This in turn meant that the financing which Anastasia had relied on for years began to dry up, resulting in she and her family having to sell off various family heirlooms and move from their comfy accommodations in a mansion south of Paris and into ever more dismal housing, even as Kiril and his family continued to enjoy a lavish lifestyle, hosted by half the nobility of Europe. The outer circle of Siberian supporters also began to slowly desert the cause, although both Alexander Kutepov and Boris Savinkov remained loyal.

The worst came when Anastasia's home was burgled and several important heirlooms, not least of which included one of her mother's diadems, disappeared, only for the diadem to reappear atop the head of Kiril's eldest daughter, Grand Duchess Maria at a subsequent function. This event, occurring in early 1932, was the final straw and led to Anastasia publicly accusing Kiril of usurpation, characterizing him as a robber of children and women, with neither the honor nor capability necessary to accomplish what must be done to restore their family to their rightful throne. From then on, the relationship between the remaining Siberian Romanov supporters and those of the European Romanovs went from sour to openly hostile - at times even turning to violence, as occurred when Prince Boris Vasilchikov, a particularly odious and vocal supporter of Kiril who had insulted and made advances upon Anastasia on more than one occasion, was gunned down on his doorstep by unidentified masked men in late 1932.

With the ongoing political chaos and strife in France, Anastasia decided it would be better and safer to move to Germany with her supporters, where the European Romanovs had less of a following, before the invitation from the Union of Monarchists arrived in April of 1933. While Anastasia and her supporters would weigh the offer closely, they eventually decided that if they surrendered such an advantage to the European Romanovs, their cause would be dead in the water. Thus, finally, after more than five years in exile, Anastasia Romanova returned to Russian soil accompanied by her close supporters and wards on the 22nd of June 1933 - a week after Kiril, his supporters and family themselves arrived in Rostov (21).

The Georgian Invasion was very much a double-sided event which not only allowed for the consolidation and stabilisation of the Don Republic under Wrangel and a fully civilian government, but also threw left the military feeling distanced and disenchanted with the current regime, many coming to see Wrangel as having betrayed his subordinates for power just as the mainstream parties were losing their grip on power in favour of their more radical counterparts. Had elections been held then and there, the reverberations would have been awesome, but the lack of scheduled elections prior to 1936 would allow the mainstream parties to maintain their grip on power in the near-term. While the National Union remained somewhat of a fringe movement, their platform leaving many unclear as to what exactly would change from the status quo due to their support of Wrangel, the Young Russians experienced another trajectory entirely.

As the Young Russians increasingly shifted their message from a vague call for the reunification of Russia to support for a restoration of Russia to its proper role as a global superpower through peaceful unification with the Soviet Republic rather than continuing the travesty of the Don Republic - which just left Russia open to exploitation by aristocrats, capitalists and foreign interests, the party experienced a precipitous increase in support. While the movement had gained a moderate following in the immediate aftermath of the Siberian Conquest, eventually seeing the rise of their leader, Alexander Lvovich Kazembek, to national prominence, it would be the Georgian Invasion and its aftermath which allowed them to truly take off. An admirer of Trotsky, Kazembek believed that the current status quo was intolerable, a plot on the part of imperialist powers in the west to keep down Russia, and while he disagreed with the Communist Party's atheistic outlook and dismissal of traditional values and institutions, believing that these mistakes on the part of the Communists, he felt that these differences could be resolved once reunification was achieved. While support for the movement lost pace as the threat of the Soviet Republic retreated from public discourse, it still experienced a steady increase in support as the international prestige of the Soviet Republic rose, Proletkult became a ubiquitous part of pop culture and living conditions in the Soviet Republic continued to improve. Finally, the failure of the Georgian Invasion and the Iranian Unification during 1934 saw the party experience immense growth, seeing an immense increase in membership which left it the second largest political party in the Don.

The single largest political party in the Don Republic had, by the middle of 1934, become the Union of Monarchists. With trust in the political mainstream, to say nothing of the military establishment and to some degree Wrangel himself, who was associated by Monarchists to both of these failing elements of the state, at a nadir there was a lot to be liked in the message of the Monarchists. Building on a platform of Integralism in Orthodox Monarchical guise, the Monarchists were able to point to the successes of such regimes in Iberia as proof of concept when questioned on their ideological model. However, while the Young Russians and National Union were relatively coherent and unified radical parties, there was a fundamental divide within the Union Monarchists between support for the Siberian and European Romanovs which the arrival of both claimants and their respective émigré factions only heightened. While the Siberian Romanovs had a good deal of respect for their demonstrated leadership in Siberia, the majority of the Don Monarchists felt that leadership by an older, experienced man, such as Grand Duke Kiril Vladimirovich, would be more beneficial for the Don Republic, not only claiming that young Nikolai was the result of a morganatic marriage and thus unsuited to rule as stated in the Romanov family laws, while also reiterating that women of the family could not inherit the throne, thus doubly disowning the young Nikolai.

These clashes had been heated, but cordial, in the years before the two rival claimants arrived in the Don, but thereafter it turned deadly with astounding speed. The murder of Prince Vasilchikov had not been forgotten, and was soon avenged when Prince Roman Petrovich, of the Nikolayevich Romanovs, and the only member of Anastasia's extended family she remained on cordial terms with, was attacked and grievously wounded, loosing his left eye, to a group of masked men who were only kept from killing their target by Roman firing his service revolver into his attackers, killing two of them while sending the others running. This sudden outbreak of violence shook the Union of Monarchists, with the leader of the Siberians, the Orthodox priest Georges Florovsky, condemning any use of violence to resolve their intractable problem. However, while Florovsky might have been opposed to violence, few of the recent arrivals had the same compunctions or reservations.

Brawls between supporters of rival factions were common, with more than a dozen killed in these clashes in the span between July and September, while more targeted bombings and assassinations, which Savinkov, who had originally made his name as a terrorist, excelled at, hit the Europeans. The European Romanovs headquarters were set ablaze during a public meeting in late September, killing two dozen attendees and leaving Kirl's brother Boris with massive burns which incapacitated the prince - leaving him heavily dependent upon a constant supply of opiates and little use to his brother's cause as much other than a martyr. In retaliation, a group of Siberians, one of whom was believed to be responsible for the fire, while out on the town, found themselves abducted and executed by an illicit firing squad for "Crimes Against Mother Russia and Its True Tsar" before being dumped in front of the Siberian headquarters with those words burned into their bodies.

With the bloodshed rapidly escalating, Wrangel saw no choice but to crack down, having soldiers ransack the homes of the factional leaders while taking them and their major supporters temporarily into custody. While no proof of Siberian actions were uncovered, the home of one of Kiril's most fervent supporters, Dimitri Alexandrovich Obolensky - who had been kept from penury solely by Kiril's generosity, included documents detailing payments to the murderous kidnappers. While Wrangel was well aware of the involvement of both sides, he was unable to punish the Siberians without proof and as such could only condemn the European faction for their actions while placing Obolensky under arrest before releasing the rest of those taken into custody.

However, as Kiril slowly made his way down the stairs of the Rostov Capitol, his steps hesitant due to injuries sustained fighting the Japanese in 1905, he found himself face to face with a young man, barely more than a teen, who raised a pistol and fired three bullets into his stomach and groin. The young man was swiftly taken into custody and interrogated, where it was determined that the man in question was deeply disturbed and had attacked the Grand Duke following the instructions of voices in his head telling him that it would endear him to his idol, the Princess Anastasia, who he had become besotted after glimpsing her arriving at the Rostov Docks. Meanwhile, Kiril lay dying, his successor a seventeen year old Vladimir Kirilovich. The two claimants were now a twelve-year old boy completely controlled by his fearsome aunt and a young and rebellious seventeen year old - a far more difficult choice than had been presented to the Monarchists previously.

By this time the Trotskyite Affair had come to an end the Young Russians had seen a sudden and dramatic collapse in their support, their prior vocal approval of Trotsky standing in sharp contrast to their sudden subsequent condemnation of the Trotskyites and their cause. This led many to depart the party, finding an equally impressive movement to support in the Siberians, who had emerged as the predominant faction within the Monarchists in the months after Kiril's murder, the bloody-minded amorality of Savinkov and fearsome charisma of Anastasia shocking their opponents into terrified disorder while the rapid ascent of Kutepov to a position of high command in the military created a new avenue of support for the Siberians, the disenfranchised and marginalised military (22).

Footnotes:
(17) This Ukrainian cultural movement is actually known as the Executed Renaissance IOTL, because the vast majority of the participants in the movement ended up butchered by the Soviets when they turned against their former Ukrainization policy around 1930 - which was soon followed by the Holodomor and Great Purge. With neither of those events happening, this cultural movement is allowed to continue developing, and is even encouraged to a certain extent by the government in Rostov. The complex political situation in the Don, which is actually a good deal more complicated than what is mentioned here due to me leaving out the various factions within the Council of Generals and the various smaller parties ( there are probably about twenty of them in all), spanning just about the entire political spectrum except for the far-left, which is outlawed.

(18) So I realised that I had forgotten about Georgia being an independent state entirely after it withdrew from the post-Great War/Russian Civil War shit show, so we are now getting a proper rundown on the situation. Georgia is in a particularly precarious position, but is able to make the most of its neighbours distractions to develop a strong parliamentary democracy. While there was considerable minority unrest early in the republic's lifespan by the time the Treaty of Tsarskoye Selo was being signed that had mostly ended. From everything I have read, Georgia actually seems like one of the places which would have done the best if just allowed to run on by itself. Already at inception the Social Democrats were supportive of multi-party democracy, and did a great deal to foster it. They implemented one of the most successful land reforms in the entirety of the former Russian Empire and while they struggled with troublesome minorities, they were surprisingly good at resolving such issues. Hell the Abkhazian troubles were stopped within a year IOTL. The main weakness of the system that they formed, from my perspective, is that they limited terms of leadership to a single year and only two-year terms at the most. That simply is not enough time for someone to pass any meaningful legislation unless they have the full legislature at their beck and call, so as the multiparty government gets going it begins to really slow down the ability of the government to pass policies efficiently. A lot of the pre-1921/22 stuff is drawn from OTL, although with attention payed to adapt to TTL, but thereafter it is mainly my conjecture.

(19) I am by no means an expert in the various weapons systems, so if anything doesn't make sense please let me know. In this case the ST-28 is an alternate earlier version of the Czech V-8-H tank. It is a struggle to figure out what weapons development would look like ITTL given the changes in priority which result from the German Empire being a major force in European affairs as contrasted with the black hole that was the Weimar Republic, but I would expect more research and investment to have occurred during the 1920s and early 30s than IOTL and different priorities for how that money is spent. The Georgians rely heavily on the Bohemian arms industry, which is as major a player as IOTL, if not more so. The whole Don Invasion ends up a costly debacle which sends politics in the polity into overdrive, as will be the focus of the coming sections. It is worth noting that the Don Invasion coincides with the height of the South Mesopotamia Famine, while the negotiations to settle the conflict occur during the height of the Two Rivers Crisis, resulting in the entire conflict becoming something of a sideshow, barely covered in international papers and un-noticed by all but the participants, their major rivals and the militaries who had advisors present. The complete failure of the Char-D1 to stand up to the ST-28 makes a major impression and results in a lot of soul searching in French ranks, while the Bohemian arms industry sees a significantly increased interest in their various projects by the German military. Finally, the conflict also serves as the spur needed to extend their terms, not quite to the ordinarily adopted four-years, but rather to a three-year cycle which will be synced to their elections after the next one, to be held in February of 1934.

(20) The main thing to take from all this infighting is that Wrangel emerges in a strengthened position, the Council of Generals is abolished, and the military in general sees a precipitous loss of legitimacy and support as a political institution. Wrangel remains one of the only figures able to maintain unity in the Don Republic. While Wrangel is far from aligned with the ideology of the National Union - he is pretty apolitical, more just wanting to ensure stability than having any specific ideological goal, that does not mean that he might not turn towards them for backing should he end up in a more precarious situation.

(21) Now the situation in the Don takes a rather monarchical turn, as both major contenders to the Russian throne return to the Don near simultaneously. These years have not been easy for Anastasia, who not only finds herself forced to serve as single mother to three orphaned children while struggling to lead an international political movement in decline. Repeated humiliation and desperation finally pushes them to open hostility, kicked off by the murder of a prominent supporter of the European Romanovs. He will not be the last man to die in the feud that follows.

(22) What secures victory for the Siberians is that while the European Romanovs have been living relatively peaceful lives in Europe, the Siberians have been enmeshed in a constant state of struggle which leaves them prone to very quickly resort to incredible violence. Not only a tendency towards violence, but an actual talent for it given Savinkov and many of his oldest supporters were once anti-Romanov terrorists. While the Europeans try to retaliate, they are far less skilled at selecting vulnerable targets and are much more driven by emotions - where the Siberians view terror tactics as simply a tactic to secure control of the Monarchists. The murder of Kiril was not planned by the Siberians, although Savinkov had something planned to get rid of him, but it plays well into their hands when the Trotskyite Affair blows up the Young Russians, allowing the Siberians to sweep in and recruit heavily amongst those who liked Trotsky's militancy and view his fall from power as a travesty. The Young Russians were able to secure a lot of young, impressionable men to their cause because of the appeal of Trotsky's aggressive and militant revolutionary stance, and when the Young Russians turn on Trotsky on a dime they are left disenchanted. The Young Russians turn on Trotsky precisely because continued support would jeopardize their greatest ambition - reunification with the Soviet Republic. We leave off with a reminder that in the Don Republic, the military is very much an active part of the national political establishment, even when they are ostensibly ejected from it.

End Note:

This is continued in the next message - just turned out that this half of the update is too long to post in one go.
 
Last edited:
Update Thirty-Three (Pt. 3): A Theory of Great Men
A Theory of Great Men

554px-Emperor_Showa.jpg

Emperor Genka (元化) at his Enthronement Ceremony

The Phoenix and The Dragon​

For Japan, the years between the 1928 election and Emperor Taisho's death in 1932 were notable for their continuation of many pre-existing tendencies of the preceding years, if with an increasingly harsh edge. As Crown Prince Yasuhito came into his own, his radical position, far-distant from the political mainstream, became an ever more worrying element in governmental decision-making. Under Taisho, the Chrysanthemum Throne had been as close to a non-entity as could be imagined, the powerful but reserved Meiji giving way to mentally challenged, sickly and eventually incapacitated Taisho, but Yasuhito promised to be an entirely different beast from either his father or grandfather. Assured of his family's divine inheritance and unwilling to allow himself to be sidelined by weak and feckless politicians, Yasuhito found himself enamored by reports of integralist ideologies and the central role which they attributed to the ruler. This, combined with his close relationship to the Imperial Japanese Army, presented sufficient of a threat to the political establishment that both of the two major parties, the Rikken Seiyukai and Rikken Minseito, were able to agree on limiting imperial power as far as possible before the future emperor could enact his ambitious plans.

However, while various politicians in either party were open to placing constraints on imperial power, the same could not be said of Prime Minister Yamamoto Gonbee, who viewed any such efforts as an affront to the imperial house and an assault upon the very fabric of what made them Japanese. A man of the elder generation and in many ways a conservative by nature, Yamamoto had grown up under the auspices of Emperor Meiji and the Genro, particularly looking up to the sole surviving Genro Prince Kinmochi Saionji, the most liberal of all the Genro and a man utterly detested by the military for his efforts to diminish their political powers at every step, and as such he maintained a feeling of awe and majesty towards the imperial office which he, amongst many others, felt was lacking in the current political leadership who pushed ever onward towards greater westernization and democratization while abandoning the traditions and practices which made Japan great. Thus, while Yamamoto retained his leadership of parliament and over Rikken Minseito, no such efforts to formally limit imperial power found themselves proposed.

However, while political matters remained relatively stable under the guidance and leadership of Prime Minister Yamamoto, this period was to see considerable growth in the radical influences in the military. The appointment and leadership of Hajime Sugiyama as Minister of War had left the radical Kokunhosha and their affiliates in the Army under the leadership of Araki Sadao rather peeved, allowing the moderate faction of the military to stand tall for the time being. However, the quest for an increasingly independent and activist army remained strong, seeking to exert power where it could beneath the notice of Yamamoto and the navy, particularly under the joint influence of Yasuhito and Araki Sadao. The key focal points of these efforts were to prove the various Japanese colonies, particularly in Chosun, Kwangtung and Taiwan, where the large military garrisons and distance from the home islands allowed the extremists to act more independently, undermining the moderates in the process while strengthening Yasuhito's base of power.

These efforts were to lead to considerable tensions and clashes between factions of the military, particularly in the Kwangtung Garrison which saw a near-constant reshuffling of the military leadership while the soldiery themselves remained relatively constant and ever further distanced from the ideological struggles at the top, increasingly finding the ideology espoused by Kita Ikki and Nippon Kyosanto, of a powerful and militant but equal Japan, of great interest. Within a four-year span, the Kwangtung Garrison saw nearly a dozen different commanders, some of which repeated tenures, such as the moderate Hishikari Takashi and the radical Honjo Shigeru, while others barely set foot inside the garrison headquarters before being replaced, as happened with Kawashima Yoshiyuki who was replaced two days after arriving in Kwangtung. A similar level of rotation would occur in Okinawa and Taiwan, but in Chosun proper, the conflict flickered out relatively swiftly when the powerful long-time Governor General Saito Makoto secured the appointment of the conscientious moderate General Muto Nobuyoshi as commander of the Japanese Imperial Army in Chosun.

There was no end in sight for this conflict when 1932 rolled around and Yasuhito's youngest brother, Prince Takahito, entered the Imperial Japanese Army Academy. The Imperial Japanese Army Academy was not only the alma mater of Takahito's brothers and many of his uncles, it was also the preeminent military academy of the army, an indication that Yasuhito hoped for his favorite brother to follow him in supporting the radical militarist and integralist ideology with which he hoped to govern, rather than the feeble democratic tendencies of the navy which he feared their middle brother Nobuhito might have been influenced by. Two years prior, Yasuhito had secured his position as heir to the throne by marrying into the senior-most cadet branch of the Imperial family, the Fushimi-no-miya - marrying the daughter of Prince Fushimi Hiroyasu, Princess Atsuko, while betrothing his brother Takahito to Tokugawa Kikuko, a paternal granddaughter of the last Tukogawa Shogun and a maternal granddaughter of the Arisugawa-no-miya collateral branch of the Imperial Family. Princess Kikuko, as she was to be known after the pair's marriage in 1934, was a beautiful but frightfully modern woman who not only held strong political opinions but also engaged in considerable philanthropic efforts, particularly on the topic of cancer which had killed her mother. The pair of Princess Kikuko and Takahito were to hit it off well with each other, enjoying a strong rapport and willingness to work together (23).

Emperor Taisho would breathe his last on the 18th of March 1932 at the age of 52, paving the way for his son and heir Yasuhito to receive the succession. This marked the end of the Taisho Era and the beginning of the Genka (元化) Era, translating roughly as Restoration to the Origin, and was followed two months later by the various ascension ceremonies, involving Genka's enthronement and handing over of the Three Sacred Treasures which made up the Japanese Imperial Regalia. Genka's ascension was to have immediate consequences in both foreign and domestic affairs. In his initial meetings with Chinese diplomats, Genka proved himself as jingoistic as many had feared, demanding that the diplomats do full obeisance, as though they were his subjects, and loudly questioned the growing hostility of the Chinese towards Japanese investors and entrepreneurs in China, specifically citing attacks on Japanese tax farmers in the south of China, and wondering whether or not the Fengtian government had restored order to China as they claimed. Deeply offended, this marked the beginning of a gradual decline in Sino-Japanese foreign relations which were further worsened by various incidents between Japanese and Chinese soldiers along the Kwangtung and Chosun borders to North-Eastern China.

On the domestic plane, Genka proved a vocal supporter of militarist and authoritarian ideologues, promoting such figures to a variety of positions in the Imperial Household when his efforts to put them into positions of ministerial power floundered in the face of Prime Minister Yamamoto's opposition. Notably, Genka proved exceedingly reluctant to clash openly with the great elder statesman, an attitude matched by Yamamoto, whose continued reverence of the Imperial House left him unwilling to go against direct imperial directives, with the result that the political status quo was ostensibly maintained. However, beneath the surface, tensions rose at an ever increasing pace, particularly within the political establishment. Loyalty to the Emperor became a defining issue of this growing split as those who, while either agreeing or disagreeing with the Imperial position, maintained their support for the Chrysanthemum Throne regardless of the situation clashed with those who felt that the development of a proper democratic society under civilian rule was the single most important issue, even if it broke with the capricious wishes and demands of the new young emperor.

As ruler, Genka invited men like Araki Sadao, Masaki Jinzaburo, Tojo Hideki, Yanagawa Heisuke and Obata Hideyoshi to meet with him and each other to discuss matters military and political, with much cursing of the Navy, which Genka maintained an ever greater dislike of as their alliance with the civilian parties grew more entrenched. In a bid to challenge the unity of the civilian leadership, Genka began personally sponsoring the development of a political party to overturn the dominance of the political elites. This was what led to the formation of the Kokumin Domei, the National Citizens' Alliance, incorporating the Kokunhosha and various far-right organizations and parties under the ostensible leadership of the civilian Hiranuma Kiichiro, Nakano Seigo, Okawa Sumei and Kazami Akira - although in reality the party was led by a civilian-military council answering directly to Emperor Genka. This party, with the overt backing of Emperor Genka, was able to swiftly build a sizable following, particularly in the rural populace of southern Japan, particularly Kyushu and Shikoku, on a platform of Japanese Integralism and State Shintoism which demanded that the Emperor take on ruling powers from the weak, disorganised and westernised political elites in order to bring Japan into a new golden age.

However, even as Emperor Genka was pressing forward in a bid to strengthen the Imperial Family and the Chrysanthemum Throne, his younger brother Takahito was experiencing an entirely new world of exciting ideas and ideologies. At the heart of the matter lay the gradually growing support for Kita Ikki's Communist ideology within cadet circles at the Imperial Japanese Army Academy over the half-decade preceding Takahito's arrival at the Academy. While the Academy's professors largely fell into one of the various ultra-right-wing camps of the military, the student body had largely become enamoured with Japanese Communism, which maintained much of the bombastic militarism and national pride which characterised the right-wing, but merged it with a clear call for revolutionary action for the betterment of all the oppressed peoples of Japan, Asia and the World.

Takahito thus entered into what might well have been an exceedingly hostile environment had it not been for the guidance of his Dorm Intendant, Lieutenant Isobe Asaichi. Isobe had been one of the early supporters of Kita's Communism, emerging as a cadet leader prior to his graduation in 1928 and becoming one of the most prominent young Communist officers in the ranks. Notably, the military leadership largely failed to control or combat the spread of communist affiliations amongst the cadets and young officers, many of the upper-level officers not even believing Communism to be an ideology military men would be willing to associate themselves with. Under Isobe's guidance, Takahito was introduced to an entirely new understanding of the world, securing the writings of Kita Ikki, Trotsky, Bukharin, Yamakawa and Fukumoto from his fellow cadets, as magazines, leaflets and books made the rounds within the various cadet dorms. Deeply moved and inspired by what he read, Takahito found himself swiftly brought into Communist circles during his first two years as a cadet, slowly growing into a leader amongst the cadets and young officers while proving that he held an adept mind for military affairs as much as communist ideology by scoring well on his various exams.

Unknowing of the changing ideological following within the Academy, Emperor Genka reacted with great happiness to reports of his brother's popularity and actively set out plans to bring Takahito into his inner circle - inviting him to meetings of the Kokumin Domei leadership and allowed him to read correspondence with Genka's supporters in the military. While Takahito remained close with his brother, he grew increasingly troubled by the plans his brother expounded upon at length and the worryingly sanguine attitudes held by many of his brother's supporters towards those who opposed them (24).

The year and a half leading up to Prime Minister Yamamoto Gonbee's retirement in late 1935 was to prove of considerable importance to the development of Japan, and particularly Japanese Communism. With the Trotskyite Affair, the budding alliance between Nippon Kyosanto and the Soviet Communist Party through the Third International collapsed suddenly. The first half of the 1930s had seen Nippon Kyosanto go through a series of tumultuous crises and conflicts which were to leave the party greatly changed as the 1936 elections came under way. At the heart of the issue lay Kita Ikki's idolisation of Trotsky and the resultant use of Trotskyite ideology as a key building block for the Kyosanto party platform. It had not been long since the party merged, and while Yamakawa Hitoshi as leader of the party had gotten used to the peculiarities of his chief ideologue, Fukumoto Kazou and Nosaka Sanzo were not as forgiving.

Fukumoto had spent a good deal of time in Moscow in the years prior to Trotsky's entry into the Soviet government, and had been deeply influenced by the Muscovite emphasis on collective decision-making, acceptance towards differences within leftist ideology and incorporation of the best parts of disparate leftist ideologies to produce a common platform. As such, he found the idea of handing over ideological concerns to someone like Kita, whose ideological beliefs broke harshly against orthodox Marxism as practiced by Nosaka and many other thinkers in the party or other more unorthodox supporters, rather than developing the ideological basis of the party collectively a major issue and consistently spoke up about the matter. Kita's militarism in particular struck Fukumoto and his supporters as deeply troubling and led to constant clashes between the two at party meetings, with Fukumoto becoming an increasingly ardent anti-Trotskyite, most significantly demonstrated when he spoke out against entering the Third International in several Central Committee meetings on the topic. While Yamakawa was able to maintain the peace within the party until 1934, the tumultuous occurrences in Russia in that year were to cause considerable troubles as the ardent idolisation of Trotsky on the part of many in the party suddenly found itself marred by the great man's trial and execution.

The arrival of Trotskyite exiles was to be a mixed blessing in this regard, as they on one hand turned a previously manageable internal struggle into a major crisis for the party. The Red Émigrés brought with them immense capabilities, know-how and experience in everything from military command and managing great bureaucracies to talented industrial developers and great communist ideologues, but by accepting the Red émigrés Nippon Kyosanto would be breaking openly with the Soviet Communists. Disagreement over what path to take, and fraying personal relationships, were to lead to crisis in the party as Fukumoto and Nosaka directly demanded that the party align firmly with the Soviet line and drive the Trotskyites out in October of 1934. This was vocally opposed by Kita Ikki, who accused the pair of being little better than Russian stooges, completely subservient to foreign ideologues, a claim which was soon pointed out as being rather hypocritical by Fukumoto considering Kita's ardent support of the Trotskyite cause up to recently.

Back and forth the party's central committee went, with Yamakawa stuck firmly in the middle as exacerbated mediator between the two groups. Ultimately, Yamakawa was able to force them to order and, after ordering the remainder of the meeting's minutes be conducted under the party's secrecy protocols, proposed a solution which left neither side particularly happy but resolved the tensions for the time being. According to Yamakawa, it would be best for Nippon Kyosanto to learn all that they could from the exiles before deciding what to do further, which was why they soon engulfed the new arrivals in a horde of aides, service staff and more who not only served the émigrés on hand and foot, but also extracted all the knowledge they could from the Russians. In this way the party was able to amass a considerable repository of knowledge on how to best govern a revolutionary state, the major pitfalls experienced by the Trotskyite leadership and the main challenges that they must resolve to avoid factional infighting as had eventually come to engulf the Soviet state.

However, this overly friendly treatment was to stoke the ambitions of some of these émigrés, even as some of their compatriots left for other states where they might find themselves welcomed - Mexico, the Central American Republic, France, Germany and Italy proving the most favored places for this group secondary to settle in. Mikhail Kalinin had largely been relegated to the role of non-entity for much of the past decade, as Trotsky first used him as a ceremonial president of the Yekaterinburg Reds and later as little better than a yes-man in Moscow, but as one of the senior-most Trotskyites to make it out of Russia he was swift to exploit the opportunity to push for greater influence for himself. In this matter, his greatest rival would prove to be the cold-hearted if competent Lazar Kaganovich, who had held the most prominence of the survivors while Trotsky remained alive. The clash between these two, however, would gradually turn against Kaganovich, who eventually picked up stakes and departed for Mexico while leaving his protégé Nikita Khrushchev behind to represent his interests in Japan. Having secured power over the Red émigrés in Japan, Kalinin now made moves which he hoped would allow him to seat himself as the uncrowned lord of Nippon Kyosanto - whose leadership had already proven themselves utterly subservient to him and his fellow Trotskyites.

Thus, in March of 1935 Kalinin began issuing ever greater demands of his hosts, claiming the right to sit in on their Central Committee meetings and jockeying for power and authority. This was to prove the final straw for Yamakawa and the rest of the leadership, even Kita giving in after witnessing Kalinin's arrogance, and led to them finally moving to assert their dominance over the émigré population. Kalinin disappeared a week after this decision was taken, only for him to turn up on the doorstep of the Vladivostok GPU offices courtesy of Nippon Kyosanto, an act which was to lay to rest much of the tension between the two Communist parties. This was followed by a sharp reduction in support for the various émigrés, as those with useful knowledge or international networks were allowed to remain as guests of the party while the rest saw their support cut entirely and were threatened with Kalinin's fate, Kalinin having been sentenced to a decade of hard labor after a swift trial. This resulted in yet another wave of emigrations, as those discarded by Nippon Kyosanto were forced to leave the country, following their fellows to other countries sympathetic to their cause. Thus, by the time Prime Minister Yamamoto Gonbee resigned in late 1935, Nippon Kyosanto stood ready to deal with whatever may come next (25).

China was to see a staggered development over the course of the last years of the 1920s and the first half of the 1930s, as in the north the Fengtian government dramatically brought the region under firm government control in a bare handful of years, while in the south a series of constant clashes occurred as government power gradually asserted itself, often in the form of non-state actors to begin with, but with increasingly forceful government authority as time went on. As the mop-up campaign for the Jiangning Rebellion was petering out, a drought in north-western China firmly drew the attention of the Fengtian government. While the region was relatively sparsely populated compared to the coastal provinces, there were nevertheless somewhere approaching fifty million people facing starvation conditions if no action was taken.

Viewing this as an opportunity to secure their control over the region, Zhang Zuolin appointed his son, Zhang Xueliang, to oversee relief efforts alongside the long-time Fengtian courtier Wang Yongjiang who had catapulted Manchuria from an unimportant frontier region into the most prosperous part of China in less than a decade. They began a highly rationalized campaign, using veteran Fengtian soldiers on anti-banditry campaigns in conjunction with an ambitious relief effort using jury-rigged repairs to the Great Canal to ship foodstuff from the prosperous Yangtze Valley north to the hardest hit areas along the upper Yellow River. This colossal feat of logistics, which was responsible for limiting deaths to the tens of thousands rather than tens of millions as had originally been feared, was to inspire great loyalty in the region for the Fengtian regime in general and Zhang Xueliang in particular while ingraining in the young marshal an awe of the infrastructural feats of his forebearers, and making him a constant supporter of grand infrastructural works, most prominently an ambitious plan to rebuild the Grand Canal as a modern industrial-scale infrastructure project capable of competing with any of the feats of industry undertaken by the Western powers.

This Grand Canal project was to become part of a much grander endeavor, as the Fengtian government adopted a scheme meant to modernise the ancient heartland of China, the Central Plains. In a vast triangle stretching from Shanghai in the south to Xi'an in the west and Beijing in the north, the Fengtian government decided to begin a major program of economic development, modernisation and industrialisation. To head this programme, Zuolin appointed Wu Peifu while charging Liang Shuming, who had already begun a private campaign of Rural Reconstruction, with leading rural development in this Central Plains Triangle, and appointed the noted scholar Hu Shih, who had previously proved influential in the May 12th Movement, to lead the cultural elements of the plan while Pan Fu, a talented administrator and financial mind with close ties to Zhang Xueliang, was given charge of managing the programme's urban projects. This plan was an immense investment by the Fengtian government, and was to consume a great deal of Fengtian resources for the majority of the 1930s, but in the process the region would undergo an unprecedented modernisation and industrialisation, with the cities of the Wei River and Lower Yellow River blooming into major hubs of industrial activity, outstripping all other regions of China with the possible exception of Manchuria in the process.

Zuolin remained an active political power, but increasingly relied on his brilliant son Xueliang whose handling of Manchurian affairs had proven incredibly successful. A man from a poor background and without much in the way of a formal education, Zuolin had ensured that his son had all the preparation and knowledge he would need to support him as the Fengtian government increasingly turned away from military affairs and towards matters of governance. As for Zhang Xueliang, he was a bit of an odd character. Thrown into a position of leadership at an incredibly young age, he had demonstrated a surprising degree of mental acuity and flexibility, able to learn statecraft, economics and administration alongside martial sciences and much else while still maintaining a startlingly complicated social life. A man of considerable charisma, Xueliang had befriended people as vastly different as Wu Peifu and Zhang Zongchang, engaging in scholarly discussions with the former while enjoying wild drug-fuelled parties with the latter, although he was able to break free of an opium addiction with the aid of the Australian journalist William Henry Donald in 1929 in an astonishing display of willpower. His love life was not one bit less complicated, having married the beautiful, talented and gracious Yu Fengzhi at the age of 15, in 1916, before falling for his private secretary, Zhao Yidi, in 1928 who came to live alongside Fengzhi as Xueliang's mistress, living effectively in what many westerners would have considered bigamy.

As his government duties increased, Xueliang would increasingly abandoned his wild youth and stopped participating in the grand parties held by Zhang Zongchang. Following the resolution of the North-West China Drought, Xueliang saw himself increasingly drawn into national political endeavors with his appointment to Foreign Minister in 1931. Having greatly improved his English through the aid of his mistress Zhao Yidi, who spoke fluent English and had previously tutored in the language, he was able to embark on a series of international visits to Japan and the United States, where he briefly attended one of Huey Long's anti-Klan rallies and met with the man, before continuing on to Europe. While in Europe, following meetings with the heads of government in Portugal, Spain, France, Britain and Germany, he made a number of important acquaintances, including Friedrich Ebert, Winston Churchill, Léon Blum and King Alfonso of Spain. For the next two years he worked on increasing foreign investment and improving foreign relations, before he was given charge of restoring order to South China, where events were becoming increasingly volatile (26).

Southern China had never fully been under the control of the Fengtian government, but the Jiangning Rebellion and its aftermath had significantly improved government authority in coastal regions and the major cities of the south, while the countryside had largely remained ungoverned and ungovernable, with village communes following Jiaxing Communism proliferating within this anarchic situation. This weak governmental authority forced the Fengtian government to rely on local actors to implement policy and exercise government authority, often meeting with considerable opposition from rural villages under Jiaxing Communist influence. As anti-Communist sentiments grew hotter in governing circles, particularly after the violent collapse of relations between the Jiaxing and Shanghai Communists in 1929, calls to restore order and civil government in the south grew increasingly loud.

It was around this time that Zhang Zuolin's long-time advisor Yang Yuting and his new compatriot, the banker H.H. Kung, brother-in-law to the disgraced Chiang Kai-shek, began to advocate in favor of turning over governance in the southern interior to local circuit and county officials while tax collection could be handed over to private actors for the best possible profit-to-investment ratio. As this programme was slowly implemented beginning in 1930 with considerable success financially, but to calamitous impact upon the government's popularity and support in the south-western provinces, where tax farmers were unleashed with reckless abandon. The lax governmental control of the south meant that this effort at tax farming, which under the best of circumstances would likely have been mired in controversy, was an immense source of corruption. Yang Yuting, who took charge of this tax collection policy in the south, was quick to sell taxing rights to just about anyone willing to pay - resulting in a swarm of bad actors buying up most of these rights. Japanese fortune hunters, Hong Kong Tongs, former warlord and bandit groups, American adventurers and a wide variety of other unsavory groups individual spent handsomely on the program, and soon began to do everything in their power to extract what wealth they could from the countryside. While the initial tax collection efforts remained relatively peaceful, it was not long before abuse and violence came to predominate. As private tax farmers, often acting as little better than bandit lords, engaged in the plundering of taxes and more, the villagers began to band together to resist the tax farmers.

Finally, in June of 1931, matters reached a boiling point when a group of notorious Japanese tax farmers swept through a county in northern Guangxi Province, only to find themselves met at the gates of a village by armed villagers and threats of violence should they continue. Angered, the tax farmers retreated for a couple days in order to hire gangs of ex-bandits and purchase arms from some local arms depots, which constituted part a network of armouries across the south containing the massive number of arms confiscated in the aftermath of the Jiangning Rebellion, before returning with incredible violence. The village was stormed, the guards murdered out of hand while the rest of the populace was given over to what was effectively a sack, women were raped, men and children beaten into submission or butchered while anything worth the slightest bit of money was plundered. After a night and day of horrors, the village was left a burning ruin and the survivors of its traumatized populace sent fleeing for safety to the neighboring villages. Word of these horrors spread with incredible haste, soon reaching the Jiaxing leadership who mustered up a force of local militias, armed with weapons hidden away during the confiscations, and laid in ambush of the marauding tax force. Finally, three days later the tax force fell into ambush and was killed, almost to the last man, while the riches and arms they had with them were spirited away by the Communists.

When word reached Beijing that a tax farming company had been ambushed and butchered, word of the preceding events remaining local and the attackers assumed to be simple bandits, the Japanese embassy was swift to issue protests and demand action be taken to provide restitution for the lost Japanese lives. Yang Yuting, ever a pro-Japanese advocate, was swift to approve of the matter, permitting the dispatch of a local military company to hunt down the bandits, which failed to find the bandits and met with considerable hostility from the local populace, and Japanese investigators who soon began claiming that the entire matter was due to the presence of Communist rebels rather than ordinary bandits. As word that a tax farming company had been butchered spread amongst their compatriots, the tax farmers grew increasingly fearful and hostile towards the population they were fleecing.

Companies became increasingly armed, drawing heavily on local armories for cheap state-approved arms, yet another initiative on the part of Yang to improve the effectiveness of his policy. As the year continued, villages and tax farmers grew increasingly heavily armed and their clashes more violent. Village communes in the region started cooperating, finding that the Jiaxing Communists were amongst those best suited for such efforts of coordination. Iterant Communist teachers, wandering from village to village and spending a week or so in any one place to teach the local children and adults basic literacy, agricultural studies and communist ideology proved particularly influential, with men such as Mao Zedong, Cai Hesen and He Shuheng rising to widespread fame in the region on this basis while men like Lin Biao, Zhou Enlai and He Long worked hard to develop village defense forces and, under Zhou Enlai, a rapid response force to deal with crises. As 1931 came to an end, and 1932 dawned, spillover from the conflict in Indochina also served to galvanize the peasant movement in the south, resulting in a series of open clashes with tax farmers, the largest of which saw a tax collection force of nearly 200 surrounded and killed by local self-defense forces and the heavily armed rapid response force in late February 1932 (27).

The outbreak of open resistance to the government, as the February attacks were to be acknowledged, led Yang Yuting to ask for, and receive access to, significant military resources to snuff out what he characterised as banditry to Zhang Zuolin. Having received permission, Yang ordered the military in Southern China to dispatch pacification forces to bring an end to the region's intransigence. It was at this point the factionalism within the Army in Southern China came into play, for there were there were two major military leaders in the region competing with each other for Fengtian favor, on one hand there was the uncouth and infamous Dogmeat General Zhang Zongchang of Shanghai fame and a close associate of Zhang Xueliang, while on the other was Chu Yupu, a one-time subordinate of Zhang Zongchang's who had since swapped allegiances, first to the services of the Zhili Clique, before following Wu Peifu into the Fengtian Clique, which Zhang Zongchang had joined in turn soon after, a fact which Zhang Zongcheng had never forgiven.

Yang Yuting's promised campaign stood as a chance for Chu Yupu to secure the personal prestige and glory he had been seeking to make him Zhang Zongchang's equal, while the latter hoped to use the task as a way to finally crush his turncoat former subordinate in Guangzhou. Ultimately, it came to down to speed - for Chu Yupu was able to dispatch his lieutenant Liu Zhennian and a considerable supporting force to deal with the bandits before Zongchang could even select a subordinate for the duty. Liu Zhennian proved himself an imminently corrupt figure with little in the way of moral compunctions about the actions of the Tax Farmers, as long as he got his cut of their proceeds. The result was to turn 1932 into one of the bloodiest years in the recent history of southern China, which, considering the anarchy of the Warlord Era, was quite the feat. Tax farmers began the widespread use of torture and punitive punishments for failure to pay, up to and including a variety of mutilations. However, when the village communes sought to fight back they would find themselves the target of vicious reprisals by government soldiery, many of whom themselves began to serve as enforcers for tax farmers while off duty, and increasingly also while on duty. With little interest in the details of how the private tax farmers went about their business, Yang Yuting remained quiet even as the tax farmers began fabricating an ever increasing wealth of taxes and tariffs, in effect beginning a campaign of vicious government-backed banditry across the region, which took on an ever more rapacious scale.

As conditions turned increasingly intolerable, the scattered armed resistance turned into an organised guerilla war as Communist-led units launched attacks on government institutions at local, county, circuit and even on rare occasions provincial levels, increasingly mirroring their fellows in Indochina. Village leaders were by and large part of the resistance, but above this level the officials proved highly corrupt and more often than complicit in the government's actions, making them preferred targets for retaliation. Government offices were stormed, with particularly odious local leaders and landlords murdered after extrajudicial trials, when they weren't just killed out of hand by the enraged mobs. The network of local armouries in the region soon became targets as well, with a daring raid led by Zhang Guotao in August of 1932 on one such armory securing nearly 30,000 rifles and ammunition to spare, with similar raids occurring in September and November, such that by the end of the year the resistance had turned into an out-and-out insurgency against Liu Zhennian and the Tax Farmers.

The sudden influx of a massive number of Indochinese rebels, fleeing across the border from a French troop surge, was to truly transform the conflict in South-West China from one on the margins of Fengtian planning and consciousness into the single greatest challenge to the government's authority since the Jiangning Rebellion. With the influx of Vietnamese veterans, the Jiaxing Communists were able to truly go on the offensive, resulting in a series of raids and attacks culminating in the capture of Anshun, a major town of Guizhou near the provincial capital of Guiyang wherefrom Liu Zhennian was conducting his campaign, by rebel forces in January of 1933. Counter attacks by Liu Zhennian during the course of January and February floundered with great losses on both sides.

At the same time Zhang Zongchang, having learned of the situation in the region and viewing it as an opportunity to attack his rival, brought the matter to the attention of Zhang Xueliang who had recently returned from the United States Presidential Inauguration. Just days later Zhang Zongchang became the target of a brother of one of the many women he had more or less forced to grace his harem, who put three bullets in the general, from which Zongchang would barely survive with a devastated health and an out-of-control opium addiction which left him effectively unfit for service - leading to his retirement from service with great distinction at the respectable age of 51. Nevertheless, the fuse had been set and Xueliang soon began to tear through the course of events in Southern China with growing horrified rage.

Finally, on the 2nd of March he brought the entire matter before his father, demanding to know how matters had gotten so out of hand and accusing Yang Yuting of being a Japanese spy aiming to undermine the Fengtian regime in preparation for an invasion, it hardly being a secret that the new Japanese Emperor Genka loathed the ambiguous semi-alliance between Japan and China, and longed for an opportunity to create a pan-Asian Japanese Empire. Surprised at the scale of the disaster which his son was informing him of, which matched little with the highly optimistic, often exceedingly distorted, reports which Yang had been providing, Zhang Zuolin soon ordered Yang to attend him. After arriving Yang was met with open acrimony and demands for answers, none of which served to satisfy an increasingly enraged Zhang Zuolin, who finally pulled his service pistol, which he always carried with him, and shot his long-time advisor dead. Yang's death would be reported as an aneurism and Xueliang was soon appointed to clean up Yang's mess. Whether or not Yang had been a Japanese spy would remain a mystery to Zhang Zuolin, who moved from a Japan-skeptic position into outright hostility towards China's neighbor to the east (28).

Zhang Xueliang faced an immense challenge on arrival in Shanghai, wherefrom he would direct the campaign for the most part. Turning to the capable General Han Fuju and the implacable General Ma Zhanshan, amongst many others, Xueliang initiated a complete restructuring of affairs in southern China, placing the trusted long-time Fengtian stalwart Tang Yulin in Chu Yupu's post, appointing Ma Zhanshan to maintaining order along the upper Yangtze and placing Han Fuju in place of Liu Zhennian - who was brought up on a variety of charges and executed as a signal on the part of Xueliang that incompetence and profiteering on such a scale would no longer be tolerated. As to the actual oversight and leadership of the pacification campaign, Xueliang demanded that the talented and popular Sun Chuanfang of Siberian Campaign fame be given the command.

With his duties now reduced to oversight of the campaign and grand strategic concerns, the young Marshal was able to turn his attentions to restoring order to the region as a whole. The private tax farming scheme cooked up by Yang Yuting was scrapped in its entirety despite numerous protests, including from Japanese officials in Shanghai who were outraged when Xueliang refused to meet them for weeks on end and presumptuously dismissed them after a barely 15 minute meeting. During this time, Xueliang really dedicated himself to getting to know Southern China properly, which was what eventually brought him to the door of the Soong family, the one-time first family of the Kuomintang. Here Xueliang made the acquaintance of Soong Meiling, Chiang Kai-Shek's one-time betrothed, and her clever and talented siblings. Over the course of 1933, Xueliang became particularly close with Soong Meiling and her brother Soong Ziwen, using them as an invaluable resource to better understand the situation in the south while seeking to engage in an affair with Meiling, a situation which horrified her mother, who insisted on a good Christian marriage for her daughter, not the polygamous heathenry which Xueliang was ultimately proposing, nearly leading to Meiling's dispatch to America and resulting in Xueliang's banishment from the Soong home.

Nevertheless, Xueliang would build a close friendship with Soong Xiwen, who he turned to for aid in resolving the economic challenges behind the crisis in the South-West, developing a stronger taxation system and engaging in negotiations with the various foreign powers based out of Shanghai in a bid to improve tariff rates and other aspects of trade relations, Xueliang ultimately appointing Xiwen as Deputy Foreign Minister. In the meantime, the relationship with Soong Meiling deepened further, although Meiling remained strongly opposed to anything which would break with Christian morality, their relationship remaining immensely ambiguous. Meiling was already well aware of the tale of Xueliang's aforementioned mistress and former secretary Zhao Yidi, the daughter of a prominent government minister who had run away from her family to live with the young Marshal to the shame of her family. Nevertheless, they continually exchanged tokens of appreciation and engaged in an impressive letter exchange in which Xueliang at times asked for advice on various governmental matters.

In South-West China, the appointment of Sun Chuanfang signalled a major shift in directions for the campaign. As private tax farmers were forced from the region, many villages matched the effort, welcoming the arrival of the famous general and his men as keepers of the peace, which turned to jubilation when word that the hated Yang Yuting had died and been replaced by the vastly more popular Zhang Xueliang. However, there remained many village communes who were hostile to the arrival of outsiders, and the network of village communes established by the Jiaxing Communists remained armed and ready to respond to attacks. As these shifts on the Fengtian side occurred over the course of the first six months of 1933, the Jiaxing Communists were rapidly strengthening their positions and even engaging in active attacks on government positions.

In Yunnan, the movement was able to secure a strong following in the provincial capital of Yunnan-Fu when the famous revolutionary Chen Jiongming led what was effectively a coup against the local governor and ex-warlord Tang Jiyao using Vietnamese mercenaries, happy to aid in removing a man who had cooperated with French colonial officials in Indochina to smuggle drugs and arms into China. With the aid of Chen Jiongming, the Jiaxing Communists now had a governmental platform from which to work, leading them to quickly stream into government offices across the province while radicalizing and drastically expanding the provincial guard in preparation for what they were certain was a devastating government assault.

That assault came in August, when Ma Zhanshan advanced up the Yangtze with his men, cutting any chance of the rebels passing into the north-west, before Tang Yulin began to press westward from Guangdong and Han Fuji sought to purge Guizhou of rebel forces. The first two efforts met with little resistance, but in Guizhou the fighting proved bitter and intense, as guerilla fighting dominated the province. Nevertheless, Anshun was soon retaken and the Communists were pushed into the south-western parts of the province before long. By the end of September the government was ready for the second phase of the campaign, with Sun Chuanfang seeking to contain the rebels to Yunnan alone. Tang Yulin continued westward at a slow pace while securing control of all border crossings into Indochina within Guangxi while Ma Zhanshan pushed southward from the Yangtze, following the road through Chongqing and Zhaotong towards Yunnan-Fu in the process running into significant but diffuse resistance. Entire villages were searched with the discovery of weapons and other illicit goods such as Jiaxing Communist writings punished with sentences of hard labor on the Central Plains infrastructure projects, and resistance punished with death.

The advent of winter in late 1933 brought the campaign to a standstill, as behind the lines Zhang Xueliang and Soong Xiwen worked to restore trust and rebuild the retaken regions. In Spring of 1934, the campaign restarted, with the last of Guangxi retaken even as northern Yunnan was slowly returned to government control. Increasingly pressured, the Jiaxing Communists debated how to proceed, whether to clash directly with the advancing armies or retreat. Finally, in May of 1934 the Communists and Chen Jiongming decided to withdraw from Yunnan-Fu, pulling ever further southward towards the Indochinese border which remained under the control of their allies in Tonkin - if only barely. Finally, at an emergency congress of the Jiaxing Communists on the 22nd of May 1934 the party determined that they would need to go into exile for the time being in order to save their movement and preserve its goals for the future of China's peoples, leading a major exodus southward, numbering nearly a million men, women and children in all, into Indochina where the previous French supremacy was once again crumbling in the face of a resurgent Tonkin resistance (29).

Footnotes:
(23) I really cannot overstate the important role played by Admiral Yamamoto Gonbee in keeping a lid on the bitter conflicts swirling beneath the surface. The idea of openly challenging Imperial authority is a novel one, and immensely dangerous because it could very easily spin out of control and bring the fervent pro-Imperial populace out in force against the political elites. Bear in mind that the political establishment mostly represent a relatively small urban populace, mostly western educated, middle-to-upper class, while the Imperial Family can call upon an endless ocean of stolid peasant partisans willing to sacrifice everything for their Emperor.

The political struggles within the army also remain relatively low-key compared to OTL for the time being, with the moderates mostly winning out. It is worth noting this is not the Control Faction (Tosei) of OTL, but rather a collection of moderates who are a lot less militaristic in outlook. They look towards cooperation with the civilian government and are willing to bring the military into line, cutting down abuses and the excessive independence exercised by many military commands. Finally, we also see some shifts in the Imperial family, as Takahito marries his OTL sister-in-law (by his third brother Nobuhito) while Yasuhito marries a much more prestigious partner, and Yasuhito finds himself inspired by the Integralist ideologies. Worth noting that he is mostly working off of relatively simple reports on European affairs which basically summarize Integralism as a powerful leadership (monarchical in Yasuhito's view, since he is most interested in the Spanish branch of Integralism), corporatist structures and authoritarian government with a good dose of militarism on top, rather than a detailed reading of the various documents and writings of European ideologues. This is not some orthodox integralism which he is sponsoring, but he is rather using some of the ideology's basic ideas as building blocks to construct his own version of the ideology with a much more Japanese flavor.

(24) Genka, as Yasuhito is known as Emperor, is a young and activist monarch who holds more than a little disdain towards the weakness of his father - who he believes allowed the deterioration of Imperial authority from the grand heights of his grandfather, although how much actual authority Meiji actually wielded is a bit hard to determine. He is ambitious and hardworking, but holds great disdain for the civilian democratic government as a hold, even if he is more than a little intimidated and overawed by Prime Minister Yamamoto. His decision to create a more formal political party to strengthen his grip on power comes as a result of him learning of the Union de la Droite in France and the way in which they gradually strengthened their political position until they were able to exploit the political chaos of 1932 and 1933 to enter into the mainstream. At the same time, however, we see that the Imperial Family begins to find itself influenced by this growing politicisation of the Imperial House, with Takahito gradually falling into Communist circles even as he becomes privy to inside information as part of Genka's inner circle. How Takahito responds to this tension will be a key decision for him at some point in the future.

(25) Here we see the continued development of Japanese Communism, as Kita Ikki's program clashes with more moderate/orthodox members of the party while Yamakawa Hitoshi maintains the peace as far as he is able. The arrival of the Trotskyites ends up causing trouble, but also proves invaluable for the vast amount of experience the party is able to extract from the émigrés. The Trotskyites ultimately end up getting played like a fiddle, with the Japanese learning all they wished to know in return for a decent but manageable investment of time, manpower and resources. Ultimately, they decide to act when Kalinin becomes too haughty and crack down on their guests, only keeping those they want to retain and getting rid of those that won't aid their cause. It is worth mentioning here that Khrushchev is amongst those retained in Japan, and he increasingly comes to serve as a key link for the Mexico-bound Kaganovich.

(26) It is worth mentioning that the OTL Chinese Famine of 1928-30 killed between 10 and 30 million people, so this is an incredible achievement which truly wins the hearts and minds of the vast majority of northern China. This section also helps to flesh out Zhang Xueliang a bit - the stuff about him personally is actually OTL including the wife and mistress/concubine (from my reading all three seem to have been living together pretty harmoniously after an initial period of conflict between husband and wife at the start. The ambitious North China development programme is an effort by the Fengtian government to counter the predominantly southern-oriented economic, social and political development which has previously characterised Chinese affairs in the 20th century.

The rebuilding of the Grand Canal is a massive long-term project, but while some areas of the Canal have been totally abandoned there are plenty which just need some maintenance work and modernisation efforts to get running properly. It will probably take until at least the early or mid 40s for the project to near completion, considering the incredible amount of rebuilding, dredging of rivers and canals, construction of new spurs of the Canal to take into account shifts in the various rivers and the like, but when it is done it will connect the entirety of the Central Plains, turning it into a single massive industrial and agricultural breadbasket which will fuel the economic development of China to new heights. The Fengtian Clique have already demonstrated a talent for industrial development in Manchuria, and they are now beginning to extend that to their North Chinese heartland. This is done not only due to the weaker grip the Fengtian grip has on the south, but also due to a variety of cultural and social biases between north and south which play into all of this, the Zhangs are fiercely northern in outlook and have come to view southerners with more than a little wariness and distrust.

(27) I know that I have gotten into some of this already, but I feel that it is probably necessary to give a somewhat more detailed description of these events before things really kick off in the next section. One of the key conflicts IOTL late in Zhang Zuolin's life was between Zhang Xueliang and Yang Yuting over the response to the Japanese. While ITTL, the Japanese are far less openly hostile, they are still viewed with a great deal of negative sentiment by many, while others - like Yang - view them as the best allies to work with for the time being as China modernises. I am probably being a bit unfair towards Yang in all of this, but I don't think this is an unfathomable path for events to take in the south. It is important to take note of the fact that this is happening in the south-western rural interior, which is extremely difficult for governments to actually deal with. Hell, to this day the PRC struggles to control the region, so when someone like Yang Yuting proposes to just hand over the hard work of collecting taxes in the region to private actors, Zhang Zuolin is open to the suggestion and foists it off on Yang. IOTL Zhang Zuolin, while supporting the development of an impressive industrial development for the first half of the 1920s, was very willing to mess with currency devaluation and creative tax strategies when the state ran into a cash crunch. In this case, while the state is doing quite well, the inability collect money from the far reaches of the Fengtian domains greatly annoy Zhang Zuolin, so when he hears of a proposal that would resolve the issue and bring in immediate money to help finance the ambitious Central Plains plans, he jumps at the suggestion with troubling consequences.

(28) So, I am realising as I write this section that I am in trouble. This was originally meant to be a quick two-section update, but it is rapidly ballooning out and I still haven't actually gotten to Xueliang's time in the south yet. This section sees a number of important developments, but the most important are probably the crossing of the Vietnamese into South China - escalating the conflict and providing a large supply of recruits and advisors, Yang's mishandling of affairs and subsequent death, leading to a significant cooling of relations between China and Japan, and finally the assassination attempt on Zhang Zongchang which ends up removing one of the major Fengtian leaders from the south. Bear in mind that Liu Zhennian was dispatched by Chu Yupu, who ends up losing a great deal of prestige from the entire matter, and with Zhang Zongchang and Yang Yuting amongst others gone there is an increasingly troubling lack of trustworthy Fengtian leaders.

(29) I am stopping there because otherwise this will just keep ballooning out. There are two parts to this section, Xueliang's increasingly close relationship with the Shanghai Elite, most prominently the Soong clan, and the gradual suppression of the South-West Chinese unrest. The approach taken by the Chinese leadership in this campaign is one of troop saturation, with each of the mentioned armies numbering almost 100,000 men, so some 300,000 in all with further reinforcements and irregulars, and a reluctant but constant retreat on the part of the Communists and their growing following. There is resistance, but the quality of arms and professionalism of the two forces are simply not comparable, Xueliang brings a good portion of his Northeastern veterans with him to aid in bolstering the southern armies, and draws on the most modern arms available in China while the rebels have what they were able to scrounge up. Also worth mentioning that by the latter half of 1933, the Jiaxing Communists have lost the backing of their Indochinese allies, who have returned to Indochina once more to continue the revolt there, resulting in a precipitous loss of veteran soldiery and resources.

Summary:
The Soviet Republic solidifies its role as a revolutionary government even as Trotsky extends his power across the state apparatus.
Trotsky reaches for the stars, only to fall short. A great man falls and his movement fall with him.
In the Don Republic, miscalculation and hubris see a failed invasion of Georgia result in major political consequences at home.
In Japan gathering storm clouds signal troubles in the future under a new and young Emperor, while in China the Fengtian government slowly extends its grip on power to the entirety of the Middle Kingdom.

End Note:

This legit took around three hours to edit :oops: Anyway, I really hope that you enjoyed all the different little tales packed into this half of the update. There is quite a bit of groundwork being set down in this one which should have consequences in some of the updates to follow.

I think that the title of the update ended up being quite fitting, everything taken into consideration - I was playing around with a couple trying to find a theme which would tie things together. This update is about what exactly the Great Man Theory implies. It sees the rise and fall of a great man to his own hubris in the form of Trotsky. It asks whether someone can be forced to be a Great Man in the form of Wrangel, it asks whether Great Men can be women or children - and perhaps what a lack of Great Men might result in. It gets into the question of whether Great also means Terrible and whether a Great Movement can be greater than a Great Man.

A thousand thanks to @Ombra for helping pick up the slack last week, giving some added insight into the lives of a few of the figures I hadn't gotten into proper detail with yet.

Starting up at a new place of work has been interesting, but has reduced how much energy and time I have to think and write on the TL, so while I am still working on writing out new updates the pace has slowed quite a bit. Luckily I have a pretty deep backlog to draw on (working on update 38 at the moment), so it shouldn't have any noticeable impact on the pace of updates or the content, at least for a couple months - and by then I am hopeful that I will have acclimated to the situation and that my pace will have picked up.

I would really love to hear more from people - what do you think of the developments? Opinions on developments in the Don/Georgia/Soviet Republic/Japan/China? Thoughts on future developments? To be honest, I sort of miss the more extended discussions that I had with readers when I was originally writing on the TL.
 
Last edited:
Also worth mentioning that by the latter half of 1933, the Jiaxing Communists have lost the backing of their Indochinese allies, who have returned to Indochina once more to continue the revolt there, resulting in a precipitous loss of veteran soldiery and resources.
That's a pretty big spoiler man! Though I'm pretty surprised that Ho and the Communists weren't able to vouch for them (with him being minister of miitary affairs and all). Though I suspect a KMT-like purge of communists might have happened.
 
Last edited:
That's a pretty big spoiler man! Though I'm pretty surprised that Ho and the Communists weren't able to vouch for them (with him being minister of miitary affairs and all). Though I suspect a KMT-like purge of communists might have happened.
The interlocking nature of events in France, South China and Indochina, as well as other areas soon to come, makes it next to impossible to not spoil events one place or another.

Just to clarify, in this case it isn't so much that the Indochinese have turned against the Jiaxing Communists, but rather that the fighting in Indochina has exploded again and therefore the previous aid provided by the Viet Quoc and ICP has largely dried up - being more needed in the fight for Indochinese liberation.

There hasn't been a break between the Communists and Viet Quoc at this point - in fact, with the sudden flood of Jiaxing Communists turning south, the Communists are bound for a major boost in power.
 
I wonder whether the ethnonym Ukrainian would emerge without the Ukranian People's Republic. I think without independence the Ukrainophile movement along with the Belarusian one would remain movements for autonomy, rather than independence, and the Malorus ethnonym would still be predominantly used. As for the hypothetical Ukrainian Autocephalous Church, I think thats almost ASB, since IOTL the church was founded in the 90s and Ukraine was granted autocephaly only like two years ago. There just wouldnt be any precedents for division at this point in the timeline - autocephaly would seem inconceivable.
One thing you should consider, however, is the All-Rus patriarchate moving from Soviet Moscow to White Kiev because of the rabid hostility the patriarch would face there. The precedent for a move to Kiev, the city being the historic gradle of the Rus Orthodox Church, could even make the move a permanent one.
On the positive side, however, the Ukrainian movement around 1920 was in full upswing. You could see a major rise in Ukrainian education, literature, art, etc. The Kuban would also probably remain Ukrainian (or Malorus) without the Soviet attempts to assimilate it into the RSFSR and the line between Russian and Ukrainian not being as clear.
 
Much has happened in these chapters, the most important was the fall of Troski. Another theme was the war between the whites and Georgia, with the result of the fall of the prestige of the military and for Japan perhaps a time bomb is being built with the possible result of a revolution or civil war for the country.

They were satisfactory updates, with great changes and for that reason a great effort is seen to make the story sense and realistic.
 
I wonder whether the ethnonym Ukrainian would emerge without the Ukranian People's Republic. I think without independence the Ukrainophile movement along with the Belarusian one would remain movements for autonomy, rather than independence, and the Malorus ethnonym would still be predominantly used. As for the hypothetical Ukrainian Autocephalous Church, I think thats almost ASB, since IOTL the church was founded in the 90s and Ukraine was granted autocephaly only like two years ago. There just wouldnt be any precedents for division at this point in the timeline - autocephaly would seem inconceivable.
One thing you should consider, however, is the All-Rus patriarchate moving from Soviet Moscow to White Kiev because of the rabid hostility the patriarch would face there. The precedent for a move to Kiev, the city being the historic gradle of the Rus Orthodox Church, could even make the move a permanent one.
On the positive side, however, the Ukrainian movement around 1920 was in full upswing. You could see a major rise in Ukrainian education, literature, art, etc. The Kuban would also probably remain Ukrainian (or Malorus) without the Soviet attempts to assimilate it into the RSFSR and the line between Russian and Ukrainian not being as clear.

These are fantastic notes, thanks for pointing out the issues with both the Ukrainian Church and the ethnonym. Will need to think things through to see how I fix things.

Will we see some changes in case of indian communism?

The Trotskyite Affair is a world re-defining event in TTLs Communist movements. How they respond to the crisis will not just shape geopolitical relationships, but also ideological developments and interpersonal relations. We will be seeing how it plays out in various different parts of the world over the next several updates. As to India in particular, it will take a bit before we get back to them but the Indian Communists will definitely be impacted.

Much has happened in these chapters, the most important was the fall of Troski. Another theme was the war between the whites and Georgia, with the result of the fall of the prestige of the military and for Japan perhaps a time bomb is being built with the possible result of a revolution or civil war for the country.

They were satisfactory updates, with great changes and for that reason a great effort is seen to make the story sense and realistic.

Happy to see the effort acknowledged :) There are a lot of important developments in these updates in particular which help shape the world as we move forward.
 
I am surprised there was no mention of Manabendra Nath Roy in Russia, he was quite well connected with early era balsaviks.
M.N. Roy was mentioned as going to Russia in update 30, he just hasn't had a chance to regain his relevance at this point. As mentioned, I do have quite a number of plans for South Asia, but it will take some time for everything to get set up and there are a number of events of considerable importance which will be coming up before that.

That said, I would love to hear what you would like to see out of the Indian Communists moving forward - won't promise to use it, but I am more than happy to find inspiration in people's comments.
 
M.N. Roy was mentioned as going to Russia in update 30, he just hasn't had a chance to regain his relevance at this point. As mentioned, I do have quite a several plans for South Asia, but it will take some time for everything to get set up and several events of considerable importance will be coming up before that.

That said, I would love to hear what you would like to see out of the Indian Communists moving forward - won't promise to use it, but I am more than happy to find inspiration in people's comments.
I am thinking of Indian revolutionary organizations after Indo German conspiracy able to consolidate and restore itself. I thinking MN Roy used his Marxist training to remove more of the Hindu features of the revolutionary movement and integrate Muslims properly. Take a moist or nakshali approach for grass root movement. I am sick and tired of Gandhi using none violence to promote Indian independence in all timelines. I wonder if subas Chandra will become a leading Marxist in this timeline? In canon stain never provided him any support at all.

Also, will the fate of the ghadar party will be different now the British are not the victor of the world war?
 
Last edited:
I am thinking of Indian revolutionary organizations after Indo German conspiracy able to consolidate and restore itself. I thinking MN Roy used his Marxist training to remove more of the Hindu features of the revolutionary movement and integrate Muslims properly. Take a moist or nakshali approach for grass root movement. I am sick and tired of Gandhi using none violence to promote Indian independence in all timelines. I wonder if subas Chandra will become a leading Marxist in this timeline? In canon stain never provided him any support at all.

Also, will the fate of the ghadar party will be different now the British are not the victor of the world war?

So far I have been avoiding digging too deeply into a lot of these groups running around below the top level movements, but we are going to be seeing considerable movement further down the foodchain. There were a lot of tensions and a surprising (in that I hadn't really heard much about it) level of violent resistance which I look forward to digging into more. As to Ghandi, his path has already diverged quite a bit - having spent much of the 1920s in prison, and I do find the rest of the independence movement quite a bit more interesting so you can expect things to be a lot more complex than just Ghandi leading India to independence through non-violence.

Chandra Bose figures to be quite important to developments in India as we move forward and as IOTL marxism and communism are going to have quite significant appeal in India - although whether or not that will lead to success for their causes is another matter entirely.

I hadn't heard of the Ghadar Movement before, but they certainly seem like an interesting element to explore moving forward.

The next update on India is Update 35, so it will be a few weeks before we get into events in India.
 
Can you make a map of the Caucasus ?
I am horribly bad at making maps, but if you go through the threadmarks you can find a world map from @Sardar which is very accurate. When I am writing, I usually have Google Maps open to get an idea of where everything is, so you can essentially plop in any of the place names I use (unless they were changed at some point IOTL - which is only really the case with some of the Russian cities) and find out where everything is. For Sokhumi (which is probably the town your are looking for) you can check THIS link.

Otherwise the below map roughly correlates to Georgia ITTL - just took the map for the Democratic Republic of Georgia which existed 1918-1919 IOTL - the landmass they cover should be just about the same:

Democratic_Republic_of_Georgia_1920.svg
 
Zulfurium,just some other questions,does the mountainous republic of North Caucasus exist ?
Is adjara controlled by the Ottomans ?
The Mountainous Republic would have been destroyed earlier than OTL by the Don Whites during their consolidation of the region. As for Adjara, I can't quite recall if it is amongst the territories surrendered at the end of the Great War, but at first look I think it might have stayed part of Georgia for the time being - if as a region contested by the Ottomans.
 
As I was reading the last few updates, I found myself hoping that Trotsky would stick his hand in the fire and get burned, and I'm very satisfied with the crisis and fallout, so I think you've done a great job with this arc :)

I hope that this means the Soviets will make it clear policy, perhaps even constitutional, that military authority is always subordinate to civilian authority and oversight. It warms my heart to see a socialist russia that doesn't wind up completely betraying the spirit of the revolution, and I just hope that they'll be able to continue to thread the needle and maintain stable government that's responsible for and responsive to the needs of the people.
 
As I was reading the last few updates, I found myself hoping that Trotsky would stick his hand in the fire and get burned, and I'm very satisfied with the crisis and fallout, so I think you've done a great job with this arc :)

I hope that this means the Soviets will make it clear policy, perhaps even constitutional, that military authority is always subordinate to civilian authority and oversight. It warms my heart to see a socialist russia that doesn't wind up completely betraying the spirit of the revolution, and I just hope that they'll be able to continue to thread the needle and maintain stable government that's responsible for and responsive to the needs of the people.
AHH! You finished! Yay! :p

It is a lot of fun when I get to follow along as people read through the TL in the notifications - always gets me wondering what they think of the work as they go through it.

I am very happy to hear you enjoyed the way Trotsky's arc played out. He has been an immensely fun and interesting character to write about - he is such a fascinating, larger than life figure with all the great man personality you could want and plenty of flaws to draw into the story.

It is an incredibly complex balance to strike, but one thing to note is that the Muscovite government actually never fell entirely under military authority the way every other faction in Russia did. Throughout Muscovite Russia, and later Soviet Republican Russia, has been under the sway of powerful civilian leaders. It is one of the ways in which it is unique imo. That said, maintaining military excellence while containing military ambitions for civilian power will always be a complicated and dangerous task, particularly in a Russian context. One of the fun things about all of this is that I simply do not know where any of these states will end up down the road - it is one of the reasons that I don't have any of those future-view updates which you see every now and then in other TLs (in addition to me rather disliking that approach in general for how much it locks in future events for the author). A lot will depend on whether the Soviet military gets an opportunity to rise to prominence - as happened in Germany during the Great War, in America and the Soviet Union after the Second World War or Napleonic France for that matter.

I have some ideas for where I want the TL to go, but most of it is still relatively contained in the period up to the early 40s. I try to avoid adding new elements and developments not directly triggered by butterflies, and as far as possible try to shape the butterflies in whatever direction I want - if that makes sense. However, the result is that there are a lot of times where I just don't know what exactly will happen more than maybe 1-2 updates down the line from what I am writing, and there are plenty of instances where I have changed my mind about what direction the butterflies are going, or stumbled across a person/organization which sends my ideas in a new direction.

This is getting a bit long, but I hope that people won't mind me going into how I approach alt-history more generally. IMO the single most important thing about a TL is its PoD, and how the initial butterflies shift the course of events. When I first started writing on ADiJ I started out just wondering what the impact would have been of Lenin and Stalin dying in July 1917. But from that came the disarray of the Bolsheviks, the resultant shifts to Kornilov's Coup and the chaos which ensues. It was only after getting through these things that I started to wonder about how it would impact the Eastern Front and spotted an opportunity to remove Italy and Romania from the board - that is also part of why that update is a bit brief. From there it was again a matter of charting out butterflies, with each change sending new ripples in motion, which in turn engendered new changes. Then it was a matter of me wanting to see if it was possible to change the German strategic approach in 1918, etc. etc. etc. I was actually still wavering over how I wanted the Great War to end up until the end of the German Spring Offensives - and it still took me a while to decide on the settled peace rather than one side actually winning out. With the updates post-hiatus I started writing after having spent more than a year digging into Asian history and culture, so my focus naturally went there to start with, and has since gradually expanded once more. I had some ideas which I wanted to explore before the hiatus occurred, and had more join them later on - particularly as I discussed matters more with @Ombra. However, this time around I am a lot more interested in all the little nooks and crannies of the world - all the places which don't get their due coverage ordinarily, which is part of why the Middle East and Asia has had so much focus this time around. Writing about Africa is honestly quite difficult because there on one hand is so much diversity across the continent, while actual english sources about the events in Africa are often very broad and superficial - lacking the depth of coverage that you get with many other parts of the world. I will be digging into the Americas to a greater extent soon, but that has also been a region that I haven't quite given the degree of love I feel it deserves.
 
Top