Narrative Eleven: The End of A Legend, The Royal Communist & The Young Marshal
The End of a Legend

Radek%27s_action.jpg

Leon Trosky is Sentenced to Death​

Mid-Day, 20th of April 1934
Bogorodsky Val Prospekt 8, Moscow City, Soviet Republic of Russia


Andrei Sverdlov could not help but feel a twinge of admiration for the great man, seated firmly in the defendant's box, back straight and attention squarely upon the proceedings even after being muzzled.

Under other circumstances, he might well have supported the man. There were few people as gifted in intellect and rhetoric, and while he had his differences with the great man, there was little doubt that the years the great man had spent in Moscow had been of the utmost importance in the quest to raise up the Soviet Republic to glory. If only he had been able to constrain his ambitions, If only he had been willing to dedicate himself the Republic, if only…

He shook his head lightly, seeking to dispel the careless thoughts.

Not far from where Andrei sat with his fellow GPU agents, stood Uncle Stuchka, haranguing the court with all the of the great man's worst deeds. Genocide amongst the Tartars, betrayal of the Communist Cause, Bonapartist Ambitions, Undermining of the Military Leadership. The list was endless, many claims merited, some not so much.

Andrei spared a glance for his boss, Mikhail Schreider, who was feeding a steady stream of information to Stuchka in the various recesses and pauses as the court case proceeded, calling up his individual investigators to provide the relevant information when the time came.

Andrei had already been up four times so far in the last week, once to explain some of the documents collected from Kamenev and Kaganovich's households, once to detail the confessions of poor Uncle Chernyi, it had barely taken a quarter of an hour before he was spilling his secrets, another to go over financial statements from the great man's household and finally to provide a summary of the information collected from the interrogations of the great man's aides and secretary. That had been messy work.

However, the work must be done. The Republic must be brought back onto an even keel. The Revolution must be protected. Even if that work was bloody. Even if it made him question his own humanity at times.

He felt unsteady for a moment, nausea rushing through him and the edges of his sight darkening.

The sight of Aleya (1) in the gallery steadied him. A pen flickered swiftly across her notepad as she noted down everything in preparation for an article in Pravda, mind clearly spinning behind her dark eyes and a slight smile on her lips.

As though feeling the heat of his gaze, she looked to him. Their eyes locked, and they shared a quiet smile, the dark thoughts swarming his mind lightened as though a breeze had blown through it, bringing the sounds of joy and happiness with it.

A memory of the winter dance they had attended at the Kremlin played before his eyes, Aleya in her stunning red dress with her raven-black hair piled atop her head.

They had been together for two years and, even if Andrei's work often took him away from the capital for extended period of time, he could not have been happier for their time together. Whether it be dinners and parties, excursions into the countryside and holidays abroad, all of it had been enjoyable when in her company. Even the increasingly nerve-wracking dinners at the House of Government seemed pleasant when she was with him.

However, it was late at night, as they unburdened themselves to each other, Aleya speaking with longing of her long-exiled father, and he of the growing stain upon his soul as the unending bloody work of maintaining the revolution weighed him down, that Andrei grew ever more resolute in his love.

After the last months of hectic work, he needed a break. There was a grand cabin at Late Ilmen which he had been promised the use of by his father. Peace and relaxation for a month in the lake-side woods, with only his childhood friends and lover to distract him. He could barely contain his eagerness to be on his way.

A soft elbow to the ribs tore Andrei from his day dream, leaving him scowling angrily at Jan (1), who was trying to return Andrei's attentions to the proceedings.

A mental litany of curses engulfed his mind as he realized what his best friend was trying to do, and he scrambled to make his way to Chief Schreider to provide his last pieces of information, throwing a grateful glance back at Jan, whose smug grin immediately made him regret his gratitude.

After handing over written testimonial evidence collected on the great man's involvement in the attempted Khivan invasion, he returned to his seat, only to realise that the great man had seemingly turned his attention to Andrei.

Their gazes crossed and for a seeming moment, Andrei felt as though he could glimpse a measure of what was going on inside the great man's head.

Remembering back to the previous weeks, when the great man ran rampant within the court, bellowing his denunciations of the charges and making a fool of Kyrlenko, Andrei could not help but feel it a pity that the revolution should be robbed of such a magnificent figure. He felt like a zoo keeper, forced to put down his prized Tiger after it turned man-eater.

-----

Two days later, the verdict condemning the great man to death on charges of Bonapartism and much else was passed down.

Three days thereafter, on an early April morning, Andrei passed through the marbled halls of Lubyanka on his way to the cells in the basement, accompanied by a pair of guards.

No matter how many times he walked through the building, he could not help but feel a cold wind along his back, goosebumps rising seemingly without cause. The majesty of the building above ground truly did not match the horrors of what happened in the dark below. But, as with all other things, with experience came contempt, the loss of awe at the cause for which the building stood, and a loss of horror for what happened below.

As he descended into the darkness, he began to hear the moans and groans, sobs and cries, of the prisoners, the great man's fall had brought with it a regiment's worth of new guests, but he forged on as though deaf to it all.

Finally, he reached the cell he had been looking for, signalling to one of the guards to open the heavy steel door, before stepping into the spartan cell.

The great man sat quietly on the cement slab on which his mattress rested, turning to the door at the sound of Andrei's entry.

A sallow, sardonic grin sat upon the great man's lips.

"Is it time, Young Andrei?" He asked, to which the younger man could do little but nod - his throat suddenly tightening up as his memories of the great man replayed themselves.

His magnificent arrival in Moscow. His braying laugh as he listened to some story or other from the many children who called the House of Government home. His visits to dinner with Andrei's father, listening as the pair spoke of their ambitions for the revolution and worked in concert to further the cause. The bitter fights between the great man and Uncle Bukharin in the later years. The great man's fearful expression when he learned that his son Sergei had been captured after the failed uprising. Now Andrei would bear witness to his end.

Slowly, he led the great man from his cell and through the hallways towards the courtyard where he was to die.

Their trip was silent, interrupted only by the click-clack of Andrei's shoes upon the flagstones and the jingling of the great man's chains.

However, just before crossing the threshold into the courtyard, where the firing squad was awaiting him, the great man suddenly turned to Andrei and spoke quietly, so that only he could hear, apparently caught by a feeling of urgency to pass on whatever he had realised on their walk.

"Remember young man, the cost of Hubris. Do not repeat my mistakes." A bizarre, almost horrific, grin split the great man's face before he turned back and crossed into the courtyard.

Andrei stood rooted in the hallways for a full five minutes before the sound of a dozen rifles firing made him jump in shock.

He entered the courtyard slowly, first spotting the firing squad marching out the door opposite while a dozen men remained behind to take care of what was left to be done.

There was a body covered in a white linen sheet at the other end of the courtyard and blood spattered upon the wall.

Andrei, resolute once more, stalked to the nearby table where the GPU record keeper was noting down the details of the execution.

Bronstein, Lev Davidovich - called Leon Trotsky: Shot Dead By Firing Squad at 05.15 on the 25th of April 1934; Last Words - "Preserve The Revolution! Preserve The Soviet Republic!"

Andrei released a breath which he had not realised he was holding.

The Great Man was dead.

Footnotes:
(1) Both Aleya and Jan were mentioned in the previous narrative section on Andrei Sverdlov, but in case people missed it these two are Ariadne Efron and Jan Dzerzhinsky. Ariadne, who proved herself a talented writer IOTL, has become a prominent young writer with Pravda, to the point of being given the task of covering the trial with a couple others, while both Jan and Andrei have joined the GPU. IOTL Andrei joined the NKVD and was a fairly prominent figure there. ITTL his father is basically head of the entire intelligence apparatus, and Jan's father was the former head of the Cheka, so the appointments seem a pretty natural fit.

The Royal Communist

450px-Prince_Mikasa_Takahito_wearing_Sokutai.jpg

The Red Prince, Takahito​

Late Evening, 8th of May 1934
Second Year Dorms, Imperial Japanese Army Academy, Tokyo, Empire of Japan


Takahito pulled at the sleeve of his cadet's uniform while the fingers of his other hand tapped a quiet, worried tat-tat-tat against the arm of his chair.

It was late in the evening, curfew having been declared several hours prior, and here he sat in the quiet study hall of the dorms as he waited for his companions to join him.

He glanced at the letters on the table. One from years ago, when his brother was still just his brother, complaining that the yearly military exercise had been cut short during his junior year at the academy. One written in the horrific days after Hirohito died, worrying about Takahito's safety and describing their father's slow descent into catatonia. Another, this time exultant, after a fruitful meeting with General Araki, probably one of the first times that Kokumin Domei was ever mentioned in writing anywhere.

However, it was this last letter, received two days prior, which was the source of his current worries and frustration.

Otouto,

I hope all is well, and that you are enjoying your time at the Academy as much as I did.

Your wife wanted me to add her greetings the next time I wrote you, so you better let her know that I did as she asked!

I really do not understand how such a small figure can contain such a great will… I worry for your future children, how will they survive if they ever disappoint her?

On a more serious note, I have heard back from Nakano Seigo that work is well under way on our political campaign. Apparently he thinks our greatest trouble comes from a gaggle of peasants and that odious Kita Ikki fellow, I remember reading one of his pamphlets at the Academy, but I cannot fathom how people can think to support him. By our ancestors, I hate this rotten "democracy" which father has shackled me to. I still cannot believe that I, a son of the Yamato, must go through with this charade. However, do not worry brother, it won't be long before we can rid ourselves of the useless parasites and restore Nippon to its rightful glory.

I had a meeting with a man from China. It seems like they are getting their mess in the south under control, but by our ancestors was he an arrogant little man. Came stalking into the audience hall, snout high in the air and a dismissive look on his face. I should have had him caned, but Captain Nonaka from the academy was able to calm me. You will never know how much I have enjoyed keeping an old class-mate by my side. Keep that in mind, and make great friends at school as well!

I look forward to the day you finish school, and can come aid me in our grand project.

One day the Red Sun shall fly over all of Asia and the Pacific - I know it can be done, and I know that I will need you by my side to accomplish it.

Don't get into (too much) trouble!

Your loving brother,

Yasuhito

His brother was worsening.

He had always been a bit peculiar, a bit overly sensitive towards criticism and restrictions and had a propensity for living in something of a dream world, imagining a world more in line with his wishes when reality failed to live up to his expectations. But as his brother grew up and came to power, matters had gotten worse.

He had been forced to give up his dream of a military career, instead finding himself engulfed in a constant swirl of politics and intrigue with little recourse but to get ever more deeply involved. Since then he had become colder, harsher, the domineering spirit of their childhood games imposed upon the adult world regardless of the harm that it might bring. His mind had been allowed to run rampant under the instigation of poisonous advisors as he began to work towards turning his dream world into reality.

The more he heard of his brothers' plans, the more worried he became for his country and its people. As written by Kita-Sensei, "Only by raising up the peoples of Nippon and uniting them in a common revolutionary cause, would they be able to throw off the yoke of the foreigner and forge a path forward for the peoples of these Islands." and if there was one thing Takahito had learned from hours of listening to his brother pontificate it was that he did not believe in unity of the peoples. To his brother, all that mattered was the accumulation of ultimate power into a single all-powerful ruler, who would be able to direct all the peoples of Nippon in bringing the Empire to everlasting glory (1).

Takahito's worried thoughts were soon interrupted by the arrival of his compatriots.

Dressed, as Takahito was, in their uniforms and carrying a welter of books, leaflets and pamphlets proclaiming their support of the cause.

"Comrade Prince, great to see you!" exclaimed the short, stocky young man at the front, using the nickname Comrade Isobe had given him the first time he attended one of these meetings. A grin crossed Takahito's face as he turned to the new arrivals, "To you as well Comrades Yukimura and Fukuda. Are the others coming?"

Fukuda gave a sharp nod as he dumped the books in his arms on the nearby table and began moving the chairs into position for their study group. Yukimura, glowered about sourly for a moment before helping out Fukuda.

A small grin graced Takahito's lips. The privileges of rank exist beyond just the Imperial Court, even here amongst Socialists and Communists, the junior gave way to senior and the follower to the leader. Regardless of what Marx had to say on the issue, there really was no escaping the strictures of Koshi-Sensei (2).

As the two junior members of their little club finished arranging the area, the rest of their members began to arrive.

Before long they were all seated, each with their own tiny booklet of notes and commentary on their readings prepared for discussion.

"Let us start with our most recent participants. Comrade Fukuda, any questions to the reading?" asked Takahito in his role as study group leader.

Fukuda, his stocky frame matched by a round face still marked by the last inklings of baby fat, grimaced slightly before fingering through his notebook, eventually settling on a page.

"I… When Kita-Sensei wrote that, only though military might can we free Asia from the grip of the coloniser, did he mean Europeans in particular? I mean, in some of Fukumoto-Sensei's writings he speaks of Japan as a colonial power, so would that not imply that any such effort on the part of the peoples of Nippon would simply be an extension of a new colonial power?" He seemed a bit flustered by the end, probably uncertain of whether he would be attacked for questioning the matter.

Takahito smiled softly, remembering when he had asked a similar question shortly after joining their little club, before answering: "No need to look so worried. You are right that there are inconsistencies between the two statements, but what you must bear in mind is that the two Sensei are referring to different circumstances. Kita-Sensei is describing a Nippon under Kyosanto leadership, as outlined elsewhere in his writings, while Fukumoto-Sensei is criticising the current state of affairs in our great Empire."

He paused for a moment to check if Fukuda was following his chain of logic before continuing, "As stated by Kita-Sensei, when Nippon falls under Kyosanto leadership it brings with it an alignment between the classes and races of our common community, washing away the stain of colonialism and unifying all peoples behind a common revolutionary cause. It is only after such a process has occurred, that Kita-Sensei imagines Nippon as the heart of a spreading revolutionary cause brought forth through military, political and cultural might."

Fukuda smiled happily, his broad backside twisting enough to draw a sound of protest from the chair. "I understand now, thank you Comrade Prince!" He seemed overly eager to have had his question answered, but then again it would not be the first time one of their newer members struggled to deal with having a son of the House of Yamato explain revolutionary doctrine to them.

Turning his attention to Comrade Yukimori, Takahito waited paitiently for the next question. It would be far from the last he answered or asked that evening.

Footnotes:
(1) Yasuhito, who Takahito is referring to, is noted for having had a brash and ambitious personality, who often clashed with his "softer" brother, the Emperor, and who greatly enjoyed military life. His development ITTL is somewhat different, as he was forced to cut his military schooling short when his brother was assassinated and has been steeped to a much greater degree in the political intrigues of the court and government than IOTL. This has allowed his ambitious personality to really let loose, as we have seen previously.

(2) Takahito is referring to the concept of the Five Bonds in Confucian philosophy, and the way in which despite espousing a disregard for culture and custom, the Japanese Communists nevertheless are unable to escape some of these fundamental concepts which have been deeply ingrained in their cultural consciousness. The Koshi-Sensei referred to here is Confucius, just so no one is left confused.

The Young Marshal

Chang_Shueliang.jpg

Zhang Xueliang, Marshal of the Qing Empire​

Evening, 12th of May 1934
Penthouse, 10th Floor of the Sassoon House, Huangpu, Shanghai, Qing China (1)


Xueliang sipped at the glass of wine in his hand, enjoying the view of both his recently arrived companion and the night sky over the City of Shanghai. Sitting in the tallest building in Asia had its benefits.

"Thank you for joining me Ling'er (2). I can't imagine your mother was pleased." A rakish grin meeting his beautiful guest. Soong Meiling was dressed in a dark qipao patterned with golden lions and copper tigers, her presence enhancing the effect of the dress ten-fold, although the angry lighting in her eyes left him the tiniest bit nervous.

"She wasn't." Came the curt response. She took a breath, seeming to calm down. "Did you need to send a limousine to the house? You are only making her angrier." Her brows were drawn together in an annoyed frown.

"How else could I be certain that you would make it in time, much longer and you would have missed the fireworks." He replied, in reference to the 12th of May Celebrations which had been occurring annually for the last decade and a half.

She seemed to give the excuse some thought before letting the matter go, slipping into her seat with impressive grace and elegance, as she did so much else.

The staff, waiting along the walls for direction, were sent into motion by a wave of Xueliang's hand - soon seeing drinks and appetizers served.

An unimpressed gaze met his when he turned back to Meiling. Xueliang gave an unrepentant grin in return.

"Did Elder Brother (3) get finished with the Guangdong Redevelopment Plan?" She asked, all business.

"He did. Ten Million Yuan, it shouldn't be an issue drawing it up from Guangzhou. Father wants to keep the focus of investment in the north for now so it might take a bit of time before the plan is put in motion."

She nodded, turning to admire the view while sipping at her glass.

"Hmmm. That should be enough to keep the place in order. I hear the campaign in Guangxi is nearing its end?"

He grinned, "I really do wish I knew who was telling you what is going on there. I think I can narrow it down to half a dozen officers, but which of them it is, I do not know."

"Why not all of them?" She asked, a sly grin making its way to her lips.

Xueliang felt a frown beginning to form before he could bring his features under control, a twinge of jealousy running through him.

"Oh. Indeed? Well, better to be too harsh than too lenient I suppose." He paused dramatically, straightening in his chair and raising a hand high, "Off with their heads!" he cried, freezing for a moment before the giggles of his companion allowed him to fall back into his chair.

"You really should be careful about such jokes, who knows, someone might take you seriously one of these days." Meiling was smiling broadly, her pearly whites clear against the night sky in the window behind her.

Xueliang checked his watch.

"We should be turning our attentions outside - the fireworks are about to begin."

Rising from their chairs, they made their way to the nearby window, where various snacks and a pair of glasses had been prepared.

A second check of his watch showed that there was barely a minute left before the festivities began.

Grapping two glasses of champagne, he passed one to Meiling with a smile, clinking them in a quiet toast just as the first explosions sounded outside the window.

Footnotes:
(1) The Sassoon House was built in the late 1920s by the exceedingly rich Sir Victor Sassoon and was one of the first high-rise buildings in Asia. Zhang Xueliang has been borrowing the Penthouse from Sassoon as residence while in Shanghai.

(2) Ling'er is a Chinese diminutive created by taking one of the characters of her name and adding 'er. It helps signal their closeness.

(3) Elder Brother here refers to Soong Xiwen, but in general in Chinese honorifics are used a great deal to refer to people. Elder Brother, Da Ge, is one such honorific.

End Note:

I really hope that people enjoy these vignettes. These ones in particular I feel are amongst the best I have written so far, but I would love feedback. I found writing Andrei's character particularly interesting, and felt that this was a great way of sending off Trotsky with a bit of style. It also let me explore some of the tension and mental pressures which people in the GPU are under. In contrast to OTL, the GPU isn't staffed from top to bottom with psychopaths, so the impact should be considerable. However, the commitment and belief in the revolutionary cause is very much alive in the Soviet Republic - where I feel a lot of that was lost during the years under Stalin IOTL. We also get a proper introduction to Takahito as an actual historical actor and figure in the TL, and a glimpse into the Young Marshal's personality up close, as well as his relationship with OTL Madam Chiang.
 
Last edited:
A Japanese prince with communist sympathies? I look forward to see where this goes.

I thought it would be an interesting direction to explore - particularly given the fact that there was an OTL debate going on about whether to retain the Emperor under a Communist state or remove the imperial family within Japanese Communist circles in the 1920s.

We're some Southeast Asian royals the same way?

OTL? Not to my knowledge. ITTL? Who knows (says the author ^.^). It will depend a lot on the circumstances and whether Japanese Communism gains any adherence abroad. That said, Japan was a favored nation of exile for a lot of Asia, so we might see some exiled royals get influenced that way.
 
This makes me wonder if were going to see a communist Japan and an Imperial China either under the Qing or a Zhang family that eventually usurps the throne.
 
Update Thirty-Four (Pt. 1): Between Dreams and Nightmares
Between Dreams and Nightmares

628px-Battle_of_Adua_during_the_Italian-Abyssinian_War.jpg

Haile Selassie Gugsa with German Advisors

The Four Horsemen of Africa​

The will produced by Ras Gugsa Welle on the death of his wife, Empress Zewditu, which named him as her successor, was disputed from the start by the various factions in Ethiopia. By 1930 the ruling Solomonic Dynasty had turned into a complex welter of interconnected and internecine relations with multiple feuding branches and numerous contenders to the throne. While Gugsa Welle made his claim to the throne by way of his wife, he was also a decent candidate for the throne in his own right as a descendent of one of the other branches of the Solomonic dynasty. Beyond that, Gugsa Welle was notable for not only his administrative and military talents, but was also renowned as a poet and dedicated bibliophile with a noted piety which drew support from the church to him. However, Gugsa Welle had good reason to hold a grudge against many of the more conservative Ethiopian nobles, who had worked constantly to undermine his beloved aunt Dowager Empress Taytu Betul, had allowed Gugsa Welle to be imprisoned and tortured cruelly under Lej Iyasu's rule, had forced him from his beloved wife for nearly a decade and had consistently sought to undermine his position as Regent in the years following the death of Tafari Makonnen.

Thus, fearing Gugsa Welle's revenge should he be allowed to ascend the throne, the majority of the conservative nobility looked for alternate candidates to the throne. While a small minority threw their support behind the imprisoned, and potentially still Muslim, Lej Iyasu - a member of the Shewan branch of the dynasty to which Empress Zewditu had belonged as well, it would be in the Tigrayan branch which was to see the greatest degree of support. While Gugsa Araya Selassie and his son Haile Selassie Gugsa had grown into the inheritors of Ras Tafari Makonnen's role as leaders of the modernist faction in Ethiopia, the Tigrayans of the Solomonic Dynasty had two, bitterly hostile lines of descent from the former Emperor Yohannes IV who contended for leadership. While Gugsa Araya Selassie's father, Araya Selassie Yohannes, was the elder "legitimate" son of Yohannes IV, he was not his only son. A younger "natural born" son by the name of Ras Mengesha Yohannes and his successors had grown to be the bane of Gugsa Araya Selassie's existence for much of his life as clashes over the inheritance of their Tigrayan kingdom consumed the two branches. Thus, while Gugsa Araya Selassie had emerged as a leading moderniser, his cousin Ras Seyoum Mengesha, the son of Ras Mengesha Yohannes, had come to be known as one of the staunchest conservatives in the country and soon emerged as the favourite successor for the majority of the conservative nobility.

While each of these candidates had their supporters, Gugsa Welle amongst the Gondorans of the north-west and the Church, Iyasu amongst a minority of the Shewan nobility and in the more Muslim south, Araya Selassie in eastern Tigray, Harar and Shewa and Seyoum Mengesha in western Tigray and Shewa, there were major power differences between them. Gugsa Welle held the capital of Addis Ababa, and with it the keys to the treasury, imperial authority and the support of the military high command in the form of Commander-in-Chief Balcha Safo, while Iyasu remained under house arrest in Harar and at the mercy of Araya Selassie's followers, who were to prove merciless. The moment word reached Harar that some were proclaiming Iyasu as the rightful Emperor, Haile Selassie Gugsa, who was serving as governor in the region after coopting Tafari Makonnen's ties to the locals through his marriage to Tafari's daughter, had Iyasu brought before him and put to death, the particular method remaining the subject of considerable rumour, with everything from a firing squad or forced suicide to him being fed to lions being circulating amongst the populace.

Thus, the first of the four contenders was extinguished before he even had a chance to make his bid for power. While this move had the effect of securing the south for the Modernists, it was to considerably weaken the faction's standing amongst the nobility, who felt that the brutal murder of a high noble and former Emperor set a worrying precedent for the conflict to come, whereas prior succession strife had usually seen the nobility large spared mass death, with exiles, imprisonment or ritual humiliation in the wake of defeat far more common than execution or outright murder. The result was the steady erosion of support for Gugsa Araya Selassie in the north, to the benefit of Seyoum Mengesha, turning the latter into Gugsa Welle's most prominent rival. This weakening of the modernist cause was to result in Gugsa Welle turning his full attentions to Seyoum Mengesha and his launching of the Imperial Army in Addis Ababa northward towards Gondar, with plans for the reclamation of Tigray. The two major conservative candidates rushed to muster their forces over the course of the middle of 1930 while the Modernists retreated into the less populous south.

When Araya Selassie arrived in Harar, he was rumored to have launched into a loud, expletive-laden condemnation of his son for the bitter blow Iyasu's death had dealt Selassie's cause. Ultimately a far more conservative figure personally than his leadership of the Modernists might suggest, Araya Selassie greatly disliked his son's total disregard for tradition and custom, semi-irreligiosity and seeming willingness to do anything to achieve his goals. This became particularly clear when Haile Selassie Gugsa proposed reaching out to the local Muslim population with promises of lessened religious discrimination to win their support, a proposal which his father shut down without discussion, disgusted at the mere thought. This tension within the modernist faction, who by and large were made up mostly of younger men disenchanted with tradition and custom, resulted in a great deal of tension, as Haile Selassie Gugsa enjoyed considerably greater support amongst his father's putative supporters than the claimant himself. Thus, with the modernisers divided amongst their leadership, the conservatives were to take centre stage during the first phases of the emergent Ethiopian Civil War (1).

The first major clashes of the civil war would occur in the north between the Welleian and Mengheshan faction of conservatives across the two sprawling provinces of Wello and Gondar. While Mengesha's initial support had largely been limited to Tigray itself, he found a rapidly growing surge of support across much of the less populous western provinces, and as such his faction soon grew into a true threat to Gugsa Welle. Gugsa Welle thus set out to isolate and defeat Mengesha in Tigray before he could reach out and begin to organize his western supporters. The result was to turn the two major passes from the central Plateau into Tigray into a bitterly contested battlefield. While Balcha Safo led the Imperial Army of the Center north-east from Addis Ababa, Gugsa Welle himself rushed to his native Gondar and began mustering the regional levies while passing over much of the administrative work to a variety of family members and church officials. However, the Welleians were not to prove the only actors in this drama, as Mengesha dispatched a holding force to the south to slow down Balcha Safo's forces while going on the offensive further north against the more disorganised Gondarans. Advancing with his well-trained personal army, Mengesha caught Gugsa Welle by surprise with his aggression and had already secured the two towns of Debark and Dabat north of the City of Gondar before the Gondarans could form into an army.

While Mengesha's force was outnumbered by almost a third, he proved undaunted, rushing to catch his rival by surprise. The result was the Battle of Gondar fought on the 18th of August 1930, in which the recently formed Gondaran Army found itself forced to battle barely a week after forming by the far more cohesive Tigrayans. Notably, this battle was largely devoid of any of the modern accruements of war and was determined more by the bravery of Mengesha's retinue than anything else. After the levies clashed, Mengesha exploited a hole between the center and left wing of the Gondaran army to break the enemy formation, charging into the gap in a classic cavalry charge and splintering the Gondaran defenders. While Gugsa Welle struggled to withdraw, using the much more cohesive right-wing to shield the retreating center, there was nothing he could do for the collapsing left. By the end of the day, the Welleians had been forced to abandon Gondar and retreat southward in hopes of linking up with Balcha Safo while Mengesha led a victory parade through the streets of the ancient ancestral city of his rival.

However, Mengesha could not rest long on his laurels, for Balcha Safo had only been slowed, not stopped, by the blocking force dispatched to stop the Imperial Central Army. The fall of Gondar opened up communications to the west and allowed Mengesha to reinforce his bloodied but victorious army, swelling the force to some 50,000, a match for the equally reinforced Imperial Central Army which had been advancing into Tigray before Gugsa Welle's arrival forced Balcha Safo to reorient his force towards Gondar. What followed was a three-month period of positional warfare across much of the Province of Gondar as the weather grew increasingly horrendous, eventually forcing the two rival armies to retreat into winter quarters, the Mengeshans in Gondar and the Welleians to the central town of Weldiya wherefrom they could advance north into Tigray, westward into Gondar or southward to Addis Ababa should the need arise, thus bringing the first year of the conflict to a relatively quiet end. The winter of 1930-31 was to see a further entrenchment of all three candidates to the throne, with Gugsa Araya Selassie finally giving way to his son's entreaties to begin recruiting amongst the southerners, with Haile Selassie Gugsa soon forming a nondenominational force, of which the elite proved surprisingly well armed as Haile Selassie opened up contact to the Germans in Somaliland without his father's knowledge. The new year would see the two conservative forces clash once more, even as the modernists mustered their forces to sweep to victory.

The resumption of hostilities in early spring of 1931 was marked by a determination on the side of both conservative candidates to determine a winner. The result was a series of escalating skirmishes fought on the rugged, largely rural landscape between Weldiya and Gondar, finally coming into direct contact along two ridgelines between the villages of Gayint and Debre Zebit a short distance from the Weldiya-Gondar road. This time Mengesha was to find his position less favorable than at Gondar, for although his army had grown to outnumber his opponent by nearly 15,000 men the Welleians had stronger cohesion and contained the modernized troops of the Central Army. Reluctant to open himself up to a counter-attack, Mengesha held his army back, daring his enemy to make the first assault. With either army located atop a ridge, it was easy to shift forces back and forth in relative secrecy and to anchor a defensive position, making the aggressor likely to overextend. Nonetheless, Gugsa Welle was a wily opponent who was well aware of such fact, leading him to rely on the one point of advantage held by his forces, modern arms. The, by global standards horrifically outdated, artillery thus opened fire on the Mengeshans. Over the course of half a day this bombardment continued as Gugsa Welle sought to push his opponent into attacking first, with Mengesha finding himself under ever greater pressure from his noblemen to do just that.

However, it would be Balcha Safo, commanding the Welleian levies. who blinked first, ordering an attack when he became convinced that the enemy force was on the brink of collapse. While Gugsa Welle scrambled to figure out why his levies were suddenly advancing, Mengesha saw his opportunity and ordered an all-out assault by his levies. As the two levies slammed home between the ridges, the Mengeshan cavalry launched themselves into the chaos without orders, seeking to cut through the enemy levies as they had at Gondar, only to stall out, becoming bogged down in the melee. This allowed Gugsa Welle to send his much more professional modern infantry to the rear of the levies, allowing them to begin firing into the bloody melee over the heads of their levies. This sudden added pressure turned the battle against the Mengeshans and saw dozens of prominent noblemen killed, their colorful dress making them obvious targets for the rifle-armed infantry. Thrown into disarray, the Mengeshans began to collapse under the pressure while Mengesha ordered his army to retreat, soon seeing his army fall apart entirely when Gugsa Welle sent in his own cavalry to mop up the enemy. While hundreds of rebel noblemen were captured and nearly fifteen thousand Mengeshan levies were killed, the commander himself was able to make his escape with his bodyguard, retreating to Gondar before continuing on to Tigray. However, before Gugsa Welle could follow up on the victorious Battle of Debre Zebit and finally crush his rival, word from the south arrived, Gugsa Araya Selassie and the modernists were marching for Addis Ababa (2).

When word reached Harar of the skirmishes in the leadup to the Battle of Debre Zebit, the modernists decided to act. While Haile Selassie Gugsa was left behind to maintain order in the rear, his father having grown to greatly dislike Haile, Gugsa Araya Selassie mustered an army numbering nearly 60,000 and set out for Addis Ababa. As word of this reached Gugsa Welle, he suddenly came to the sudden realization that he had massively underestimated the modernists. Using the rise of the modernists, and particularly their widespread recruitment of Muslim levies, to drum up anti-Muslim sentiment amongst both Welleian and Mengeshan conservatives, Gugsa Welle was able to recruit massively from amongst the recently captured nobility, in the process recruiting nearly half of their levies and boosting his battle-hardened army to a full 80,000 men. While leaving Balcha Safo to mop up the remnants of the Mengeshan resistance, Gugsa Welle set out southward with the bulk of his army in a race against the modernists. Ultimately, it would be Gugsa Welle who arrived in the capital first, arriving barely two days before the modernists.

The resultant two-month Siege of Addis Ababa saw the two sides dug in around the south-eastern edge of the city. Daily skirmishes occurred, but the majority of the fighting was left to the rifle-armed professional troops on the side of Gugsa Welle and Araya Selassie's German-armed elites trained by Haile Selassie Gugsa. As the fighting ground on, and the northern levies, many of whom had been in the field for nearly half a year, leaving their families to manage their subsistence farms by themselves, grew increasingly riotous in the face of a seemingly never-ending campaign. As the pressure grew to act for a conclusive action to end the conflict grew, Gugsa Welle began to consider his options. Ultimately it would be the ultra-conservative Ras Kassa Haile Darge, one of the most prominent of Gugsa Welle's original backers, who came with a solution to his leader's troubles. Leading a powerful force of cavalry on a long and dangerous march through the mountains south of Addis Ababa, Kassa Haile emerged on the plateau behind the modernists during the night of the 18th of July, sending a signal flair into the air to let Gugsa Welle know of their success.

What followed was the Battle of Addis Ababa, fought on the 19th of July, which first saw Gugsa Welle's levies thrown forward against the modernist positions with the rifle-armed infantry in support to pin them in place before Kassa Haile launched a charge into the modernist rear. Caught by surprise, the modernists struggled to pull out while Araya Selassie was caught up in a pocket of resistance by the cavalry and killed. Taking over leadership of the army was Haille Selassie Gugsa's brother-in-law Desta Damtew, who sought to save what he could in the retreat, allowing most of the rifle-armed infantry, modern artillery and cavalry to make a retreat while sacrificing the predominately Muslim levies to slow the pursuit which followed. Hunted, the retreating army continued to shed men to rear-guard actions, desertions and exhaustion, finally straggling into Harar where Haile Selassie Gugsa had prepared defences to repel the pursuers. The death of his father paved a path for Haile Selassie Gugsa to take up leadership of the crisis-struck modernists, who were reeling from the defeat. However, Haile Selassie was able to whip up support for his leadership, silencing what little dissent existed to his authority, and turned to foreign powers for assistance, arranging a meeting with the Germans in Somaliland in hopes of negotiating aid against the surging conservatives.

In the meanwhile a triumphant Gugsa Welle, believing his enemies totally defeated and having dispatched Kassa Haile to deal with the modernists as he had Balcha Safo to Tigray, retired to Addis Ababa after sending home the discontented levies and western noblemen as the work of rebuilding his crisis struck realm came under way. The first Gugsa Welle knew of the German entry into the civil war was the arrival of a panicked messenger on the 29th of August 1931 informing the putative Emperor that his pursuit force had been crushed by the sudden appearance of a foreign army. Armed with copious light tanks, airplanes, machine guns and portable artillery, the German Expeditionary Force had swept Kassa Haile's army before it like so much dust, with the modernists once again marching for Addis Ababa with renewed vigor, having secured a major shipment of arms from the Germans and recruited further forces from the increasingly depleted south.

Gugsa Welle sought to muster his recently dispersed army at Addis Ababa, but by the time the modernists and their German allies had arrived before the city on the 13th of September he had only been able to scrounge up some 20,000 men in addition to the 10,000 men of the Central Imperial Army. This army proved insufficient to deal with the oncoming attackers, who used strafing airplanes, effectively impenetrable light tanks and machineguns to crush all opposition, with Gugsa Welle captured and executed by modernist forces under Haile Selassie Gugsa's command. The capture of Addis Ababa allowed Haile Selassie to declare himself Emperor, being crowned by a clergy at gunpoint as Negusa Nagast Haile Selassie I, even as the dispersed conservative nobility sought to form a scattered resistance to the suddenly victorious modernists, only to find their forces scattered by the wing of fighters purchased by Haile Selassie on credit and armed by German advisors and Ethiopian cadets.

While German advisors were soon swarming to attend Haile Selassie's court, Seyoum Mengesha was trying to drum up support for another go at the crown, securing the backing of Balcha Safo, only to see his home base of Tigray overrun by modernist troops armed with German weapons. On the run and with his army shedding ever more support by the day, Mengesha would disappear into the countryside, making his way gradually westward over the following winter. When the German expeditionary force departed Ethiopia that following spring Mengesha and Balcha Safo would raise the banner of rebellion once more, this time in the province of Illubabor. However, this uprising would be put down within two weeks through the use of the aforementioned fighters and a rapid-action force of modernist cavalry, Mengesha finding himself forced to flee into the Saharan Desert, where after he disappeared from the historical record while Balcha Safo was captured, put on trial and executed. The Modernists had emerged victorious in the Ethiopian Civil War, but in the process had sold out their country entirely to the Germans, who soon took control of the country's foreign and trade policy, even as German industrial, political and military advisors found themselves welcomed into the Ethiopian court with open arms by Haile Selassie (3).

Footnotes:
(1) I am sorry about all the complicated names and the various royal branches, it gets quite complicated but hopefully people understood. There are four candidates to begin with - Gugsa Welle from Gondar in the north-west, the cousins Araya Selassie and Seyoum Mengesha from Tigray in the north-east split with the east under the former and the west under the latter (although Araya Selassie has a lot more support elsewhere due to his leadership of the modernists which he inherited from Tafari Makonnen) and Lij Iyasu who was from Shewa but whose support for Islam might have gained him support in the south had Haile Selassie Gugsa not killed him. From my read of prior succession struggles, they seem to be surprisingly easy-going as to the fate of the high nobility on the side of the loser - rather they preferred blinding, placing people into the church or sending them into exile over killing them when they didn't just pardon them or place them under house arrest (although there are a good number of claimants who ended up dying in battle). The death of Iyasu, while securing the south for the Modernists and with it connection to the outside world, severely damages the faction's standing amongst the nobility and results in their loss of support in more conservative regions in the north. This allows Seyoum Mengesha to really profit from this development, setting him up as the second largest contender to the throne and Gugsa Welle's greatest rival.

(2) Ultimately, what decides who wins the clash between the conservatives is that Gugsa Welle has access to the modernized forces established by Ras Tafari Makonnen. The clashes are bloody, and particularly the levies pay heavily, but it is notable that the Battle of Debre Zebit sees the death of a large number of noblemen and an even larger number of nobles captured. While Mengesha is able to make his escape, his defeat is absolutely devastating and sees him reduced to his home province for support - and even here, there remain a good portion of the population more inclined towards Gugsa Araya Selassie than Seyoum Mengesha.

(3) And so ends the effective independence of the last independent state in Africa. Gugsa Welle really seemed to have won it all, but the immense technological advantage which the Germans wield, as well as the support of a significant portion of the local population (although support for this foreign intervention was lukewarm at best even in modernist circles) really mean that he has little chance of success. Mengesha finds himself falling precipitously from major claimant to the throne, to little better than a back-country bandit. It is worth noting that the Germans don't actually have any military forces in Ethiopia outside of a concession in Addis Ababa and their various advisors. The relationship here is more like some of the early 1800s colonial relationships in India or Iran during the Great Game than anything like the total control exercised in much of the rest of Africa. Ethiopia is more like a client state of Germany than an out-and-out colony in other words.

Dragon_Rouge_-_DG100b.jpg

Colonial Residents in British East Africa seek refuge in British enclaves​

The British African Famines of 1931-35 were to strike the various parts of the British Empire in Africa with greatly varied degrees of impact, but nevertheless would play absolute havoc with British power and authority in Africa. At the heart of the crisis lay the aftermath of the 1925 US-UK Trade Agreement which had opened up the British colonies in Africa to American agricultural imports, serving as a safety valve for the grossly over-capacity American agricultural sector. However, in the process, local agricultural produce had seen a dramatic collapse in prices, putting most farmers above the level of subsistence out of business if they had not had the foresight to shift their production towards various cash crops. At the same time, the rural population of British Africa began to seek better opportunities on those emerging large cash-crop plantations, in the numerous mines or in the growing cities of British Africa, resulting in a sudden swelling of the urban populace, only sustainable in the short run due to the availability of cheap American produce.

However, with the emergence of the drought known as the Dust Bowl in America beginning in the late 1920s and rapidly escalating over the first half of the 1930s, this ready supply of food stuffs began to shrink with uncommon rapidity, with the result that by the end of 1930 many major African towns and cities were experiencing intermittent food shortages, with some of the shortfall made up by purchasing from the large population of subsistence farmers dotted across British Africa and various other emergency measures. By 1931, the situation had grown particularly dire in British West Africa, with many Nigerian cities seeing major food shortages and the first inklings of famine.

This was met with a relatively prompt and capable response by the colonial administration in the region, with the recently appointed Governor Sir Bernard Henry Bourdillon negotiating with local chiefs for a share of their produce and working to shift food from the relatively untouched northern provinces to the greatly impacted south. In the process Bourdillon demonstrated a surprising capacity for managing cross-communal relations, securing help from the Muslim North for the Christian South while working with the French colonial government in the neighboring colonial states to secure further famine relief. By the end of the year, the troubles in West Africa had largely been resolved with the death-count kept below 10,000 and a renewed colonial emphasis on local food production would largely make up the shortfall from America by late 1932.

While West Africa had been the first afflicted it was also to prove the least impacted region of the British Empire in Africa after the Sudan. The region least reliant on American produce, the Sudan would instead be marked by the disruptions on its borders in both north and south which caused food shortages - the Ethiopian Civil War cutting Nilotic trade connections for several years while Egyptian warmongering saw relations between the Sudanese colonial administration and that in Egypt grow particularly frosty with a resultant drying up of cross-border trade. The fact that the vast majority of the populace lived as subsistence farmers or nomadic pastoralists meant that the impact of these shortages was largely limited to the few cities and towns in the region, with Khartoum experiencing intermittent food shortages between mid-1931 and mid-1933, although never to the point of causing a collapse in order or mass deaths. Western and Northern Africa thus escaped the crisis by and large. Instead, it would prove to be East and South Africa which were to be laid low by the crises which erupted during the first half of the 1930s (4).

In order to understand the crisis in East Africa, it is necessary to understand how the leadership of the colony had governed the colony in the prior decade. The first colonial administrator of the post-war period had been Sir Horace Archer Byatt, whose approach had emphasised the revival of African institutions and the encouragement of limited local rule, a stance which was bitterly opposed by the Conservatives who were swift to appoint Sir Donald Cameron, Byatt's opposite in all regards including in colonial policy, to replace him. For the following eight years Cameron had overseen East African affairs, developing a system of more direct rule in place of local autonomy involving white settlers and, often Indian, administrators in an informal advisory council which helped him rule the colony. It was on the basis of recommendations from these figures that Cameron essentially tossed aside East Africa's own nascent food production industry in favor of massive cash-crop plantations run by white settlers. East Africa was marked by the savannah more than any of the other areas of British Africa, which left less of a subsistence farming population and more of a semi-nomadic pastoralist populace, who increasingly turned to cheap American animal feedstock and grew their precious herds to previously unimagined sizes, in the process putting a greater strain on the region's natural resources.

Thus, when access to the American feedstock suddenly dipped, before collapsing in 1933, these massive herds were now forced to feed off the land, which soon saw entire swathes of land denuded in the rush to secure food for the herds. Before long, the herds began to run out of food and soon after began to die off in shocking numbers. This double blow, in which the countryside was denuded of animal feed and the subsequent mass die-out of the massive herds, sent shockwaves through the native populace, which suddenly found itself in deep crisis by the tail end of 1932. Tens of thousands migrated into the cities of the coast and the Nairobi region in the months that followed, bringing with them their mouths and stomachs, and little else. The result was a sudden and massive increase in the urban population just as American food exports reached their nadir, resulting in massive food shortages across the colony.

While Cameron tried to resolve the crisis as best he could, he lacked the resources and friendly partners which had allowed West Africa to weather the storm, and as such even as the South Mesopotamia Famine was reaching its apex, the situation in East Africa was spinning increasingly out of control. Wave after wave of calamity struck, as a cruel cycle developed, reduced animal feed would result in deaths amongst the great cattle herds, which helped feed much of the population, which in turn led to a reduction in food availability. As food scarcity exploded and the animals on which countless tribes had built their wealth were culled to keep themselves from dying of starvation, unrest began to emerge. With pastoralist tribes suddenly losing their livelihood, they were forced to turn to urban migration or banditry.

Kenya would be the focus of much of this strife, while the towns and cities of the coast, Nairobi region and Great Lakes region saw a massive influx of migrants. Nairobi could not handle this sudden influx, and soon saw massive food shortages and enormous population swings as mass die-offs were offset by new arrivals, while in the Great Lakes, the locals greeted the pastoralist newcomers with intense hostility, soon escalating to open violence. The coastal region, where food was more easily obtained, remained relatively peaceful but the interior was collapsing rapidly into chaos. As matters surrounding the Two Rivers Crisis and the South Mesopotamian Famine came under control over the first five months of 1933, the British were swift to rush the troops previously mobilised against the Ottomans south to East Africa to aid in pacification and famine relief efforts.

During this time, the situation along the Great Lakes was turning from bad to worse, with what amounted to open war breaking out between the incoming pastoralists and their sedentary neighbours for control of local food resources, the region having been amongst those least reliant upon American produce due to the fertility of the region. The denuding of the western Kenya soon reached the point of desperation, with tens of thousands dying of sickness, starvation or violence as social structures began to collapse in on themselves. White Settler colonies, mines and plantations soon became targets of roving bandits, with the settlers fortifying their settlements with rifles and on rare occasions machineguns. Looted mass graves and instances of cannibalism were discovered in the slums of Nairobi by horrified British officials, who had to fight their way back out of the slums to safety in the British Quarters, which had itself been rapidly fortified and protected by British soldiery.

When the British forces from Mesopotamia arrived, they found themselves inducted into the British Pacification Army in Kenya, commanded by Major General Sir Edward Northey, who was also named as Military Governor-General of Kenya, a man of noted racist tendencies and open brutality, Northey had nevertheless made a name for himself during the Great War and its aftermath before spending the last decade as administrator of Zanzibar, where he had been unable to make too much trouble. His appointment, occurring during the tumultuous political circumstances following the Two Rivers Crisis in Britain, was decided by the colonial office without much input from the distracted government and was to shape the response on a fundamental level. Northey came in with the sole goal of restoring order, cost what it may, and in doing so utterly obliterated any strictures, cultural, legal or social, which stood in his way. After settling the coastal region over the course of the remainder of 1933, Northey advanced into the hellish central and western parts of Kenya, putting down any opposition to his advance with force and placing the pastoralist population into massive camps where they could be fed more easily with imported produce from India. This would lead to the dissolution of many tribal bonds, as little attention was given to ethnic, cultural or religious divides amongst the interned, and a great deal of suffering as the starved internees were put to forced labor to help rebuild the colony.

By the middle of 1934 the worst of the unrest had largely been quelled outside of the Great Lakes Region, which took another half a year to pacify, with tens of thousands killed in the brutal process. Northey relied heavily on White Settler outposts to help administer the reconstruction of the colony, doling out internees to various settlements for aid in their work. This mass usage of forced labor for everything from plantation and mine work to the building of railways and the establishment of villages for the pastoralists - who were now forced into sedentary life by the colonial administration, eventually drew protest in London, with Northey and his horrific regime finally brought to an end in 1935. However, by then the damage had been done. Tribes, ethnic groups, religious groups and linguistic groupings had been torn apart and hammered together with little regard for such differences, with even families torn from each other and settled at seeming random, often across the country from each other. Pastoralist life was greatly weakened, with the majority eventually making their way north or south to the neighboring German colonies while an implacable hatred had been sown between the original sedentary population of the Great Lakes and the former pastoralists who had fled to the region in search of safety from the cataclysm only to be met by fire and blood (5).

South Africa had always been amongst the most troubled of the dominion relations within the British Empire, from powerful and influential native peoples such as the Zulu and Xhosa, to the ever rebellious Dutch-descended Afrikaner population and complicated racial structures, but these troubles would pale in comparison to the horrors of the South African Famine. There were three major factors which played into the defeat of Jan Smuts' liberal South African Party in the 1924 elections, his harsh suppression of the Rand Rebellion by White miners, his failure to secure the incorporation of South Rhodesia to South Africa and his lukewarm support for a more independent path for South Africa. This allowed for the ascendancy of the conservative National Party in coalition with the Labour Party, which had turned on Smut's South African Party over the handling of the Rand Rebellion. Together these two parties set about creating the foundations of an Afrikaner welfare state through a wide range of social and economic measures aimed at unifying Afrikaner support behind the government.

In 1928 the Labour Party entered into a period of considerable crisis as Walter Madeley, a prominent left-wing Labour MP and Minister of Posts, Telegraphs and Public Works, called for the recognition of the Industrial and Commercial Workers' Union, which had non-white members. This greatly angered the National Party leadership, the recent Fall of Siberia greatly increasing anti-Communist sentiment on the right, and led them to demand that Madeley resign. This led to a major internal conflict in the Labour Party, which culminated in Madeley being removed from his post at the direction of the party leader, Frederic Creswell, in the process firmly aligning the Labour Party behind a policy of White nationalism while drawing the party closer to the National Party in the process. However, this effort was to meet with considerable opposition from within the Labour Party, even as Walter Madeley continued to protest this course of events. Greatly angered by these developments, Madeley would reach out to the Communist Party of South Africa to declare his membership, becoming their first Member of Parliament in the process. Many of Madeley's supporters would follow suit, joining the CPSA as well. The sudden emergence of the CPSA as a political force came as a great shock to the rest of the political parties, who were further scandalised when the CPSA recognised the Industrial and Commercial Workers' Union, as well as a range of other multi-race trade unions, and opened up the party to non-White South Africans as part of a general policy of "Africanising" the party.

The 1929 elections were to see the return of the South African Party to government under Jan Smuts, as the National Party's coalition partners, the Labour Party, saw a precipitous collapse in support. During these middle years, the National Party government had opened up the economy to American imports, particularly of produce, as not only a cheap solution to feeding their rapidly expanding population, but also as a way of opening up a path for South African participation in the world economy outside of British influence. In general, South Africa experienced a period of incredible growth during the 1920s, which was further spurred on by the weakening of tariff barriers which allowed trade between South Africa and the United States to expand massively during the latter half of the 1920s, with the incredible wealth dug out of the ground helping to fuel the luxurious lifestyles of the New York and Washington elite. The newly elected South African Party would seek to further encourage these developments by removing much of what they viewed as excess governmental assistance, particularly for the agricultural sector where policies like high import taxes on all butter sales, preferential railway tariffs for famers and low-interest loans from the Land Bank all served to protect farmers against international competition while greatly increasing the cost of living for the average Afrikaner. The result was a further strengthening of industry and resource extraction companies at the cost of the farming population and an associated drastic lowering of the cost of living, which proved quite popular in urban areas. While the rise of the CPSA did cause considerable tensions, peace was maintained for the first few years of the new decade (6).

Ultimately, the horrors of the South African Crisis would have less to do with the actual food supply which, while significantly impacted, never quite reached the devastating levels experienced in East Africa. Instead, it would be social, cultural and racial divisions which caused the greatest strife in the region. The heart of the crisis would lay in the Transvaal, where racial tensions between Whites and Blacks were worst and the mining industry was at its most expansive. South Africa was amongst the last of the regions in Africa to begin relying on large amongst of American produce, with the majority going to the coastal cities and to the great mining settlements of the Transvaal while the remainder of the dominion was largely unimpacted. Thus, the first place struck by food shortages were the Transvaal's mining settlements, which were able to alleviate much of the immediate stress in 1931 and 1932 by switching to purchasing local agricultural produce. However, this resulted in the spiking of food prices, which disproportionately impacted the black miners of the Transvaal who were payed significantly worse than their white counterparts.

As the food supply worsened, while the quality worsened and the price rose dramatically, discontent began to make itself known. This was further amplified by the presence of recently trained CPSA agitators, crying out for the miners to lay down their picks and shovels in strike until proper food could be supplied - the number of miners collapsing from a lack of energy, with some even dying, having increased with worrying rapidity since 1930. By early 1933, as the height of summer struck and the mines turned into little better than furnaces, the number of dying miners rose to the dozens in individual mines with considerable worries that more would follow before the end of summer. Finally, on the 16th of January, the black miners had had enough, beginning work stoppages which soon spread to engulf the entire mining sector and threatened to draw sympathy strikes in many other, equally troubled sectors. The Second Rand Rebellion was now under way.

While negotiations were initially considered, the fact that the vast majority of the strikers were black led the government to press for the squashing of the rebellion without much more thought given to the matter. However, the Rand was not only manned by black miners, there was a considerable population of white miners in the region who felt that their black fellow miners had stolen their work and had displaced their white colleagues from numerous lucrative mines. Largely members of the Labour Party, these white miners saw in the Second Rand Rebellion a chance to reclaim their dominance of the Rand mines. Thus, when government forces began to move on the demonstrators, they found their efforts assisted by angry white miners with little interest in allowing the black miners back to work. The result was a bloodbath, as the predominantly white soldiers mostly sat back and allowed armed white miners to do their work for them. Protesters were shot out of hand, quickly spilling over onto anyone black in proximity of a mine before spreading to the nearby townships, with bloodshed escalating rapidly. However, the black miners were not to take this lying down, and before long the black and white miners were butchering each other with astonishing brutality with the army largely sitting on the sidelines perplexed and uncertain about how to resolve the situation.

This escalation in violence soon drew in local tribes from whom many of the black miners had originally come. It was at this point that the army began to act, attacking tribes as they began to cause trouble, driving them back into the Veldt. It was at this point that the crisis truly began to spin out of control, with the claimant King of the Zulu Kingdom, Solomon kaDinuzulu, speaking out against the violence, urging black South Africans to resist oppression. While officially only one chieftain amongst many in Zulu country, Solomon was widely acknowledged amongst the Zulu themselves, and his call to arms was answered by them in their tens of thousands. Attacks on white settlers and settlements exploded over the first couple months of 1933 while Afrikaners in the Transvaal turned back to their roots as commandoes, forming local defence forces and commando units with which to suppress the riotous black populace.

Bloodshed escalated rapidly, leaving the administration in Cape Town scrambling to find a solution to the crisis. Jan Smuts replaced the commanders of the military forces in the Transvaal, in hopes of securing more effective action, but the fact that both the Afrikaner and Black population was proving increasingly hostile to government forces caused major headaches in government circles. The conflict even threatened to tear the National Party apart, as the majority of the party rallied around the former Prime Minister J.B.M. Hertzog to support the government effort and call for an end to the violence amongst the Afrikaners, while the much more radical church minister and MP Daniel F. Malan called on the government to aid the Afrikaner populace in protecting themselves from rapacious black attackers and threatened to break with the National Party if they should fail to support their brethren in the Transvaal, in effect paralyzing the party.

The violence and anarchy spread throughout 1933 and soon began to reverberate across South Africa, with the Cape Colony in particular struck by sudden resource shortages as a result of the Transvaal mines shuddering to a halt. This led to mass layoffs and rapid increases in unemployment, which in turn drew great condemnation and anger, threatening to turn into open protests. However, beginning in 1934 with the arrival of considerable British aid, the situation was stabilised in the Cape Colony, which in turn allowed the government to finally begin restoring order in the Free State and Transvaal over the course of the following two years.

In the aftermath of the crisis, renewed elections would see the return of the National Party, this time as sole ruling party and on a significantly more rabidly segregationist platform. The most troublesome tribes in the east, most prominently several of the larger Zulu and Xhosa-speaking tribes, were to be split up and moved to South-West Africa, where they were mixed together and settled into small villages in an effort to gradually break up the tribal and ethnic identities of these troublesome tribes. At the same time a comprehensive new series of racial segregation laws were passed and strict controls on the remaining tribes were put into place while a series of anti-labour laws were passed by the horrified parliament which saw the right to strike, the formation of independent unions and much else largely restricted. The fact that the South African Party had been forced to turn to the British for aid was to leave a major stain on the party which ultimately led to its dissolution in 1937, while Jan Smuts retreated from politics, spending most of his time writing about his experiences, researching and writing a comprehensive history of South Africa and serving as advisor to various political protégés (7).

Footnotes:

(4) We start out with a bit of a repeat of some of the stuff previously mentioned in regards to British Africa before examining the regions where the African Famine had the least impact, namely West Africa and Sudan. It is important to make a note of the fact that West Africa has the largest portion of subsistence farmers, and is the most fertile of all these areas, and as such is able to find alternate food sources relatively easily. The weight of the crisis also very much impacts the relatively small urban populace, primarily in the Niger River Delta, and as such is much more contained than elsewhere. Even then, we still see nearly 10,000 deaths before the situation is brought under control.

(5) I do apologize for how grim all of this ended up getting, but I felt that it would be fascinating to see the sorts of unintended consequences something like a careless trade agreement can have. Famines were relatively rare in Africa for much of the 20th century, but I feel that the circumstances line up enough for it to remain a plausible direction for events to go. Cameron probably comes off worse than he deserves, considering he IOTL as Governor of Tanganyika largely championed a more inclusive approach, even if he is noted as having been a major critic of Byatt's openness towards the local population IOTL. Here he remains a staunch opponent to Byatt's policies, but given that Kenya/East Africa has a greater British settler population than Tanganyika I could see him relying more heavily on the settlers for support. Northey is an OTL racist asshole who IOTL tried to coerce African labor to work on European-owned farms and estates even after the Colonial Office had rejected such a plan, with him eventually getting dismissed for going through with it. Here he is basically given free rein to restore order to East Africa - with horrific consequences.

(6) I ended up needing to do quite a bit of background to prepare for the crisis that follows, but I hope that people find these divergences interesting. The major change here is that instead of the Labour Party cracking in two between Madeley and Creswell, with Labour on Madeley's side, here Creswell is able to secure stronger backing from the party to remove Madeley from his position. This is a result of the changes to the Communist movement, which, as elsewhere, is a lot more inclusive than IOTL and as such is an easier destination for Madeley to depart for than it was IOTL. The CPSA entering onto an "Africanising" path is also OTL and was adopted as policy in the late 1920s. This loss of support on the part of Labour, beyond strengthening the Communists, also has the important role of boosting the South African Party back into leadership - preventing the OTL total dominance exhibited by the National Party until World War Two. This also means a change in policy with the new government, which decides to pursue a decidedly less interventionist policy and most importantly greatly deprioritizes that farming sector in favor of business and industry. It is worth noting here that the South African Party draws most of its support from the urban populace, particularly the business elites, and of the various major parties in South Africa is the most willing to work with the British. The National Party by contrast is right-wing and strongly tied to both Afrikaner Nationalism - although lacking the inherent distrust of the left-wing exhibited by most right-wing parties of the time. The National Party-Labour alliance is actually all OTL.

(7) And we are done with the nightmare. This was not particularly pleasant to write about, but I do think that it is fascinating to consider what an even more antagonistic set of race relations in South Africa would have looked like, particularly in the first half of the century. This is before Apartheid was instituted as government policy and in a time when South Africa was coming into its own, developing its national identity. The South African Crisis of the 1930s shakes all of that up and allows me to explore this part of the world. IOTL, this period is something of a golden period from what I have been able to read up on it where things seemed relatively under control, economic prosperity grew and firm social structures began to develop even as South African national culture was emerging after the Boer Wars. By contrast, ITTL the period will be known as a defining national crisis which reshaped the political, social and economic spectrum on a fundamental level. I will finish off by mentioning that King Solomon of the Zulu ends up being amongst those dispatched to South-West Africa in exile.

Jean_Price-Mars.jpg

Jean Price-Mars, President of Haiti

A Cruise Through The Caribbean​

The two troubled nations of Hispaniola, Haiti and the Dominican Republic, had both come under American occupation soon after the start of the Great War, Haiti in 1914 and the Dominican Republic in 1915. While the Dominican occupation had primarily been triggered by American exasperation with the tumultuous political situation in the country, in Haiti the presence of a small but powerful German minority and their potential role in creating a German-aligned base in the Caribbean had played into decision-making as much as the ongoing political turmoil. The occupations were wildly unpopular with broad swathes of the populace in not only the two occupied nations, but within the United States itself, where many questioned the need for the intervention and the considerable costs it brought with it.

From the start, the occupations were fiercely resisted with the gavilleros in the Dominican Republic and cacos of Haiti each causing considerable trouble. While in the Dominican Republic this resistance would continue to trouble the occupiers, with constant attacks and anger from the population, in Haiti resistance was crushed with shocking violence in two "Caco Wars" which combined saw several thousand dead. The American treatment of the two states also differed considerably, with the Americans far more open to cooperating with the local Dominicans, whose racial mixture was far more varied than the almost exclusively African-descended population of Haiti, with the result that even President Wood, otherwise a pretty stalwart supporter of American efforts abroad, was convinced of ending the occupation of the Dominican Republic with speed. This process, which saw the effective occupation ended in 1921, would culminate in the 1924 election of the pro-American Horacio Vásquez Lajara.

Matters in Haiti, by contrast, were to prove considerably more troubled. In 1915 the US Senate had ratified the Haitian-American Convention which granted the United States security and economic oversight of Haiti for the next decade while giving American Representatives veto-power over all governmental decisions and appointing Marine Corps commanders to serve as administrators of Haitian government departments, although local institutions remained under Haitian rule. This allowed the American occupiers to re-institute a system of corvée labor, forced civil conscription in which Haitian civilians were captured and forced to work on the numerous public infrastructure projects begun by the American occupation.

The end of the Great War was to introduce a much welcomed international dimension to the occupation, as the German Empire began to lodge protests with the American government for their actions taken against the German minority population of Haiti, specifically the confiscation of their businesses, which at the time of the occupation had been responsible for 80% of Haiti's international trade.

Thus, with international lines of communications opening up once more and the protests of the German Haitians streaming in to the Foreign Ministry, German diplomats began to exert pressure on the Marshall, and later Wood and McAdoo presidencies for the ending of their occupation, a restoration of the plundered wealth of the German Haitians and various other matters. While President Wood remained forceful in his opposition to any such suggestions about ending the occupation of Haiti, the same could not be said of the incumbent President McAdoo, who had come into office on a promise of ending foreign entanglements such as Haiti. The result was that when the 1915 Haitian-American Convention came up for renewal in 1925, President McAdoo campaigned against its re-ratification, ultimately allowing it to lapse, returning authority to the American-selected President Louis Borno. At the same time the Americans payed out a cash settlement to the German Haitians which, while far less than the worth of their confiscated businesses, allowed them to reestablish themselves as part of the Port-au-Prince elite, a status further solidified by the arrival of more German businessmen eager to make inroads into the recently independent state.

Independence brought with it an end to the hated Corvée labor and a reopening of Haiti to the world market, with the various European countries soon streaming in to make their presence known. However, the American occupation had allowed them to take control of the largest share of the pie, dominating more than 90% of all international trade out of the island nation and granting them important supporters in all major government departments. Fears of another American invasion played havoc with the Haitian populace which in 1928 saw the election of a fiercely anti-foreigner candidate in the form of the immensely popular Jean Price-Mars (8).

A doctor, teacher, diplomat, writer and ethnographer, Jean Price-Mars was deeply impacted by the occupation and was inspired by the constant active resistance of Haiti's peasants. Over time he had come to embrace the African roots of Haitian society as a part of the wider Négritude movement by championing the practice of Vodou as a full religion. He argued against the prevailing prejudices and ideologies of the Haitian elites, which favored European cultures from the colonial period while rejecting all non-white, non-western elements of their culture. In the process Price-Mars had begun to formulate a form of African-Haitian Nationalism which identified the Haitian cultural identity with the African struggle against slavery, harkening back to the island's proud stand against the French in their bloody revolution, while denigrating the mostly mixed-race elites for their inability to promote the welfare of the wider Haitian populace.

Price-Mars' rise to power came on the backs of the firmly black peasantry and a segment of the mixed-elite who had come to embrace Price-Mars' and other Negritude writers' belief in the African nature of Haiti. Price-Mars aimed to reorient Haitian society away from the long-dominant mixed-race elites of Port-au-Prince and towards the more firmly black working and peasant class. As a result he began passing a series of major legislative proposals which would work towards redistributing wealth within Haiti while exploiting the intense infrastructure construction conducted under the occupation to help tie the country closer together. He had Vodou recognized as a religion on equal footing with the Catholic Church, to the utter horror of the Port-au-Prince elite, and sought to favour the German Haitian minority as the government's window to the outside world, in the process hoping to create a second pole of foreign influence to play off against the Americans. By 1930, Price-Mars found himself so intensely unpopular with the mixed-race elite and his fears of assassination so great that he chose to move government operations to the town of Ganthier some thirty kilometres east of Port-au-Prince, where his supporters greatly outnumbered his detractors.

During this period the Dominican Republic had remained relatively peaceful under the leadership of Lajara, however in 1930 he set out to secure a second term of office and was soon betrayed by his own Chief of Police Rafael Leonidas Trujillo Molina who, in coordination with a rebel leader by the name of Rafael Estrella Urena launched a coup which saw Urena appointed acting president and Trujillo as head of police and the army. As per the agreement between Urena and Trujillo, the latter became the presidential nominee of their newly formed party with Urena as his running mate. However, in order to secure victory, Trujillo unleashed the army on his opponents, forcing them to withdraw from the race, and in May of 1930 was elected as President of the Dominican Republic virtually unopposed. The ascension of Trujillo and Price-Mars laid the seeds for a growing confrontation between the two states of Hispaniola.

During the initial period of government under Trujillo, he was able to significantly strengthen his grip on power, rebuilding the Dominican capital after it was devastated by the Hurricane San Zenon bare weeks after his ascension, while renaming the capital after himself. In 1931 Trujillo made the Dominican Party, of which he was head, the nation's sole legal party and forced government employees to "donate" ten percent of their salaries to the national treasury. He murdered opponents of his government and allowed for the arrest of people caught without a party membership card. Finally, in 1934 Trujillo had himself promoted to Generalissimo of the army and secured re-election as the sole candidate on the ballot while seeking to build up a cult of personality. It was during this time that Trujillo truly began his campaign of Antihaitianismo which was effectively a brand of anti-Black discrimination targeting the Haitian minority in the Dominican Republic and the Afro-Dominican citizenry, while the government heavily favored white migrants and refugees, soon becoming a favoured destination amongst White Russians, Serbians and Ukrainian Jews, who proved eager to help build up the republic.

In Haiti, the mixed-race elites of Port-au-Prince finally made their move in late 1931 when a contingent of soldiers trained by the Americans and headed by mixed-race officers launched an attack on Ganthier, gunning down any who stood in their way as they sought to capture the Haitian president. However, Price-Mars had been expecting something like this for a while and had plenty of caco fighters at the ready, who soon swarmed the relatively small attacking force and butchered them to the last man. Price-Mars now turned to Port-au-Prince, mustering a massive if rag-tag force of cacos who descended on Port-au-Prince with the aim of purging the city of traitors. Ultimately, a significant portion of the mixed-race elites would find themselves forced to flee into the reluctantly welcoming embrace of the Americans. Debate over whether to take actions to reinstitute the occupation were brought up in the US Senate, but floundered in the face of bitter partisanship and disinterest in the issue.

Thus, the nation fell fully into Price-Mars' hands with his government now further enriched by the confiscation of the considerable fortunes of the exiled elites. Over the following years, Price-Mars would continue in his efforts to develop an authentic Black Haitian nation state, railing against the Americans and Dominicans for the most part, while quietly developing ever strengthening ties to the Germans, who he viewed as sufficiently distant and disinterested in Haitian affairs to merit cooperation with. During this time, Price-Mars drew close with Jacques Roumain, one of the many mixed-race elite who had turned his back on his wealthy background, although in Roumain's case he had turned to communism. Price-Mars, while distrustful of foreign, European, ideas found much of interest in communist writings and soon began to adopt elements thereof - particularly building on the village-based communal structures developed by the Muscovite Communists. While never particularly clear about his particular political affiliations, Price-Mars would gradually come to adopt more and more of the ideas espoused by Roumain, who rose to become Price-Mars' vice-president following his victory in the 1933 elections. Notably, Price-Mars would spend much of his time in the city of Cap-Haitien, preferring it over the mixed-race dominated Port-au-Prince. Finally, in 1937 the tensions between Haiti and the Dominican Republic began to boil over when Trujillo dispatched orders to the Dominican military to clear out the Haitians in Dominican lands with violence (9).

Cuba had been a nation inextricably tied to the United States since its War of Independence at the dawn of the century. Since then the country had gone through two separate periods of occupation by the Americans, considerable political turmoil and, in 1917, and a brief civil war between Liberal and Conservative Parties triggered when the Conservatives were faced with defeat in the 1916 elections to the Liberals. This conflict, which initially seemed to be playing out entirely in Liberal favour after the initial Conservative coup attempt failed, was forced to a close by the Americans under threat of armed intervention, with the Americans restoring the Conservative Garcia Menocal to government despite his electoral losses due to suspected pro-German sympathies in Liberal ranks.

Despite this turmoil, Cuba came out of the Great War Period in relatively good standing, as artificially boosted sugar prices brought about by sugar scarcity allowed for considerable economic growth in Cuba. However, the moment that the war came to an end and international trade rebounded, the price of sugar cratered. Cuba's economy was build almost entirely on the sugar industry, and as such this sudden collapse in prices was to send the country into bankruptcy by the time of the 1920 elections. This time it was a major Liberal figure of the 1917 civil war, Alfredo Zayas, who took power. Zayas spent his four years in power on advancing women's rights, including securing them the right to vote, and conducting reforms in the fields of education and social security, allowed freedom of the press without censorship, secured the return of the Islas de Pinos, which had been occupied by the United States since 1898, and obtained a loan of fifty million US Dollars from J.P. Morgan with the aim of relaunching the devastated economy he had inherited.

However, Zayas and his government would find themselves dogged by charges of corruption, up to and including the President himself. Since 1913, when Zayas had ceased to be Vice President of the Republic, he had designated himself as an official historian of Cuba with the decadent salary of 500 pesos a month, while during his tenure, he won first prize in the National Lottery twice. He gave free play to other vices, engaging himself in the smuggling of alcohol to Prohibition-Era America while maintaining a web of influence in all government offices. By the end of his term, Zayas' personal fortune had grown to several million pesos, making him amongst the richest men on the island. By 1923, many of the island's intellectuals had seen enough and published a public letter of protest, which came to be known as the Protest of the Thirteen - which ultimately sank Zayas' chances at a second term. Instead, Zayas turned to his comrade-in-arms from the 1917 crisis and ally in government, Gerardo Machado, to succeed him.

In the following 1924 elections Machado was able to emerge victorious, defeating Zayas' old rival Menocal in the process. It is worth noting at this point that beginning in 1923 the price of sugar began to rally, allowing the Cuban economy to slowly gather steam once more, fueled both by the increasing sugar prices and the loan Zayas had secured from J.P. Morgan. Machado would prove himself a considerably more popular figure than Zayas or Menocal, coming to power on the notion of turning Cuba into the "Switzerland of the Americas". The new government tried to reconcile the interests of the different sectors of the national bourgeoisie and the American capital in its economic program, offering guarantees of stability to the middle classes and new jobs to the lower classes. Its economic program focused on the reduction of investments, a policy of reducing the sugar harvest to stimulate depressed sugar prices in the world market, and a tariff reform which raised the price on foreign products that could be produced in Cuba.

The increase in sugar prices brought with it an increase in foreign, particularly American, investments which allowed the Machado government to embark on an ambitious pubic works program which saw the construction of the Central Highway of Cuba, which was to run across practically the entire island from east to west, saw the construction of El Capitolio, the new home of the Cuban Congress, and the expansion of the University of Havana to mention but a few of the numerous building projects undertaken under Machado.

However, while Machado had pledged to not seek a second term, which was prohibited by the 1901 Constitution, this state of affairs did not last for long, and by 1927 Machado was pushing through a series of constitutional amendments which would allow him to seek re-election, allowing him to secure a second term in the 1928 elections. However, Machado's growing shift towards authoritarianism was met with bitter resistance, most prominently by the University Student Directory of the University of Havana, which had formed in 1927 in response to his constitutional changes. The following years saw numerous protests led by the Student Directory and the assassination of several student leader by Machadista gun-men while others were driven into exile, with the University of Havana itself being shut down temporarily in 1930 to quell the resistance. While the student leaders sought to whip up outrage at the government's treatment, they were largely met with shocking indifference if not hostility, as many of their elders came to believe that the riotous students posed a threat to the continued prosperity of the island.

By 1931 it had become clear that Machado had succeeded in his goals of securing power while pacifying the country through economic prosperity. In 1932 Machado negotiated an end to the bitterly hated Platt Amendment which had allowed constant American interference in Cuban affairs while continuing to strengthen his hold on power. He would secure re-election once again in 1933, at which point he began a more extensive adoption of Portuguese Integralist principles, with the aim of securing his position at the head of the Cuban nation for years to come (10).

The Post-Great War period was to prove a time of considerable development and change for the African-descended population of the Americas, connecting together a web of black ideologues from Harlem and New Orleans to Le Cap, Kingston and Paris itself. At the heart of these developments lay Harlem, on the isle of Manhattan in New York. The Harlem Renaissance and subsequent movements grew out of the changes that had taken place in the African-American community since the abolition of slavery, most notably the mass migration of African Americans out of the south, the rise of the Ku Klux Klan as a major force in American society and the need for African Americans to shape an understanding of their role in society, as Americans, as Africans and as African Americans.

Playwriters, authors, preachers, musicians and artists of all sorts contributed to a feverish cultural ferment in which the racist stereotypes which pervaded much of society were challenged by works of art, music and literature emphasising Pan-African pride and capability. The migration of southern Blacks to the north had changed the image of the African American from rural, undereducated peasant to one of urban, cosmopolitan sophistication. This new identity led to a greater social consciousness, as African Americans became players on the world stage, expanding intellectual and social contacts internationally. The progress, both symbolic and real, during this period became a point of reference from which the African-American community gained a spirit of self-determination that provided a growing sense of both Black urbanity and Black militancy. The urban setting of rapidly developing Harlem provided a venue for African Americans of all backgrounds to appreciate the variety of Black life and culture. Through this expression, the Harlem Renaissance encouraged the new appreciation of folk roots and culture. For instance, folk materials and spirituals provided a rich source for the artistic and intellectual imagination, which freed Blacks from the establishment of past conditions. Through sharing in these cultural experiences, a consciousness sprung forth in the form of a united racial identity (11).

While originating in Harlem, it was not long before black students and scholars from across the world began to flock to Harlem in search of help in developing their own intellectual traditions. One such tradition would prove to be the Négritude movement, which was initially assembled in Paris but soon developed a second heart in the Haitian city of Le Cap, which gradually took on increasingly Communist and militantly African nationalist elements and fell under the sway of Jean Price-Mars. Another intellectual tradition came in the form of the New Orléans Renaissance, a development spurred on by Huey Long's willingness to defend the black and mixed population of Louisiana against discrimination. Here, in the swamps of the Mississippi Delta, a distinct cultural movement came under way, far less willing to adopt the dress and manners of northern whites, as they accused the Harlem Renaissance of doing, and rather more closely connected to the Caribbean movements out of Jamaica and Haiti. While willing to cooperate and participate in American society and culture, the New Orléanisan movement drew a sharp line between themselves and their white neighbours, holding that while segregation was harmful to the development of the African spirit due to the inherent inequalities it fostered, it was necessary that Black America be allowed to develop on an independent path from that of White America.

These concurrent cultural and social movements would take on a variety of different tacks and adopt an often confusing profusion of positions on various issues, with each movement split amongst itself in turn as well. The Harlem movement borrowed much from the White Progressive movement of the time, most advocating for integration and the breaking down of segregationist barriers, viewing themselves as American citizens who wished to remain part of the United States. At the opposite end of the spectrum lay the Le Cap Négritude movement, which was fiercely black nationalist in outlook, rejecting any idea of living alongside Whites, and ever searching for ways in which to grow closer to the African Spirit, be it through Vodou, Jazz or pilgrimages to Africa.

Between these two poles lay the other movements : The Garveyites of Jamaica, the New Orléanians and Parisian Négritudes most prominently, of which the first would prove itself most significant. The Garveyites were adherents of the Jamaican thinker Marcus Garvey, who had initially risen to fame and prominence as part of the Harlem movement, where he established the Universal Negro Improvement Association and African Communities League, the UNIA. Garvey emphasized the unity between Africans and the African diaspora, campaigning widely against European colonial rule in Africa and promoting the political unification of the continent. However, he soon found himself in trouble with the mainstream Harlem movement as his plans for Africa after liberation fell increasingly into Integralist lines of thought, envisioning a united Africa under a one-party state rule in which he would govern as President of Africa.

In sharp contrast to mainstream Harlemites he doubled down on segregation, believing that a liberated Africa would need to enact laws to ensure Black racial purity, and committing firmly to the Back-to-Africa movement, arguing that African-Americans should migrate either to Africa or to Black-dominated states like Jamaica or Haiti rather than remain in a White-dominated America. However, Garvey soon fell from grace in Harlem, when he was convicted of fraud under dubious circumstances and imprisoned in Atlanta from 1923-25, before being deported to Jamaica in 1927. In Jamaica Garvey worked to rebuild his following, developing a chapter of the UNIA and founding the first Jamaican political party in the form of the People's Political Party in 1929. Garvey would meet on several occasions with President Jean Price-Mars of Haiti, cooperating with him and the Le Cap Négritudes to support the development of black-led nations and championing independence for Jamaica, although by the early 1930s the two men would fall out over their diverging political alignments.

During the first half of the 1930s, the Back-to-Africa movement experienced considerable ideological turmoil as the collapse of the greatly admired state of Ethiopia into civil war and eventual client status to Germany shook belief in Ethiopianism to its core. Many thinkers were to interpret this development as evidence of the loss of God's favor and the need for a spiritual and moral rebirth before Africa could be reclaimed from the imperialist powers. It was during this time that Gugsa Welle, the Last African Lion as he would be known, became the subject of deification and cult worship - portrayed as a martyr for the cause of a Free Africa. This was set side by side with the development of a functioning black-ruled state in Haiti, and saw Jean Price-Mars elevated to a status similar to that of Gugsa Welle in some circles. Despite the hardships and differences experienced within and between the various Black movements of the time, the 1920s and 30s were a time of great cultural and social development for the African-descended population of the Caribbean and America (12).

Footnotes:
(8) For the most part this is all OTL up until the 1920s where the Post-War divergences begin to play into events. Events in the Dominican Republic largely proceed as per OTL, although there are some minor divergences in the timing of events. It is in Haiti where we see the larger divergence. IOTL it would take until 1934 for Haiti to restore its independence, during which time the country continued to utilise corvée labor. Here, the continued presence of Germany as an international power really comes into play, with the small German merchant population in Port-au-Prince playing a key role in drumming up the German Foreign Ministry to press the Americans on Haitian affairs. This pressure, combined with the fact that the occupation was never particularly popular in the United States to begin with, ultimately result in the occupation coming to an end significantly earlier. At the same time we see the growth of anti-foreign, particularly anti-American, sentiment in the aftermath of the occupation and eventually an earlier rise of the black working class of Haiti significantly earlier than IOTL.

(9) To be honest, basically everything mentioned in the Dominican sections of this update are OTL, except for the fact that without the rise of anti-Semitism in Germany Trujillo is forced to rely on other groups of white settlers to help build up the white population of his side of the island. I cut off just before the OTL Parsley Massacre because that is when things are really going to begin going off the rails of OTL, something I will be saving for a different update.

The developments in Haiti by contrast are of a significantly different tune than OTL. Price-Mars has elements of the OTL Duvalier dynasty's emphasis on black Haitian culture, but lacks their bloody-fisted tyrannical personality or approach. He is more of a scholarly ideologue than anything, who has succeeded in hitting on a particularly powerful brand of black nationalism, which he uses as a cudgel against the mixed-race elites, and finds the whole idea of dictatorial rule rather sordid. He maintains what proves to be a semi-functioning democracy, even if his governing party retains a super-dominant position after kicking out the former ruling elite and implementing a series of democratic reforms which grant universal suffrage, and in the process make the Black peasant and working classes the single most powerful force in politics. Notably, he does not fall into the pitfalls of totalitarianism. In fact, Haiti, particularly the city of Le Cap (Cap-Haitien), becomes a centre point for the Négritude movement and various other Afro-American movements, as we will get into later in this section.

(10) The major divergence in Cuba is the lack of a Great Depression throwing the country into total turmoil. Thus, while Machado's power-grasping ways cause him to lose a good deal of popularity, the vast majority of the population remain supportive, simply wanting the good times to continue. This means that the student protests and revolts are far less aligned with the public interest, and as such they are unable to muster the general support they were able to develop IOTL, and largely fizzle out in the face of brutal repression by the government. This allows Machado to maintain power and to strengthen his hold on the country, whereas IOTL the student protests helped spur on a more general anti-Machado movement which eventually saw his removal from power and paved the path for the 1933 Revolt of the Sergeants which brought Fulgencia Batista to power originally, setting the stage for Cuba's long run of dictators. Machado's shift towards more authoritarian government sees him gradually abandon his Liberal roots in favor of a more Integralist political ideology, in which he fashions himself as Cuba's Sidonio.

(11) Up to this point, this is basically a description of the OTL Harlem Renaissance movement's development.

(12) There are a lot of divergences here which will take some work to explain. The four most important factors in these divergent developments are 1) the early end to the occupation of Haiti and rise of Jean Price-Mars 2) the lack of a Great Depression 3) the earlier Rise of Huey Long and 4) the death of Tafari Makonnen and subsequent Ethiopian Civil War.

The first of these allows for the establishment of the Le Cap Négritudes as a much more significant movement than IOTL, shifting perceptions on what is and is not possible for African states in the Americas. The second of these allows the Harlem Renaissance to continue on without disruption, whereas IOTL it ended up losing a lot of credibility for its blind enthusiasm - which matched poorly with the Depression-era's rather, welll, depressive mentality. I have taken some liberties with Huey Long and assumed that he would be willing to shield an African American cultural movement from persecution if it gave him influence and prestige in black circles, which is what allows for the development of the New Orléanisans, who do not have an OTL counterpart. The fourth, and final, of these factors sees the butterflying of Rastafarianism as a major force and the partial collapse of the Back-to-Africa movement's emphasis on Ethiopia as some African idyll.

I have here imagined that the various movements would begin to define themselves at least partially in opposition to each other, which is why the Harlemites end up much more strongly associated with the progressive movement, the Négritudes with National Socialism and Communism, the Garveyites with Integralism and the New Orléanisans with Longism. It is worth mentioning also that Garvey's ideas are all lifted from OTL, although ITTL he and the UNIA are much better off financially, which allows him to stay in Jamaica. Influenced by Jean Price-Mars and the Fall of Ethiopia, he also becomes a lot more interested in Jamaican Nationalism, possibly as a jumping-off point for his grand African ambitions. I largely left out much mention of the influence of the Ku Klux Klan's rise and the like, but do bear in mind that all of the other developments in American society are occurring alongside these and in contrast to them.

End Note:
This is a somewhat mixed bag of an update, some really dismal stuff and some hopeful developments. As ever, my inability to keep things simple whenever I come across an ideological or social movement pops up, with multiple different directions to the OTL Harlem Renaissance. I find it quite interesting to dig into these different figures to explore where they might have gone. Jean Price-Mars is particularly fascinating to me for the central role he played in making Vodou an effective religion and Marcus Garvey is impressive in his sheer ambition, for god's sake, the man declared himself President of Africa IOTL. Haile Selassie Gugsa shows us another path taken, mirroring his OTL betrayal of Ethiopia to the Italians with much greater success ITTL. Finally there are the grim developments in British Africa. I can't tell you how much thought and work went into making sure that it remained compelling without being a complete Vlad Tepes Award submission. The famines of the 1930s are going to be major defining developments for the course of history in particularly East Africa and South Africa, but I am happy to be past them. Was not a pleasant topic to write about or think about in detail.

Oh, and with this update the TL crosses 500k words. Thank you everyone who has been willing to read through all that to this point. It means a lot.
 
Last edited:
I gotta say I absolutely love your inability to keep things simple with ideological and social movements, this TL is so much more than the usual tale of events and people, with all this attention to the history of ideas.

There's a lot to be hopeful about in the update - can Ethiopia navigate their new clientage relationship to hold onto internal autonomy while getting German investment that broadly raises the standard of living? Can the democratic consolidation of Haiti lead to a multi-party democracy with the parties in enough alignment to accept the democratic legitimacy of their opposition? Can Long's machine survive long enough to leave African-Americans with lasting political power across a portion of the South? Could we see an earlier, or perhaps instead a less intensely resisted, march towards civil rights? For example, if the cross-burners do a good enough job of alienating white america?

Even in all the grimness of many events in this update, I still find reasons to hope - in the imposed breakdown of traditional social structures in Kenya and South Africa, could we see the gelling of strong, unified anticolonialist movements?

Casting my eye even further to the future, without the red specter of communism, could we see a far safer world than OTL in the 50s and on? No CIA arming the colombian paras, no (or perhaps just fewer) CIA-backed corporatist banana republics, and the geopolitically-dominant socialist ideology not being a military-authoritarian-centralist one (and indeed, likely still, remembering the danger of bonapartism)... Ah who am I kidding, it'll be the integralists vs the socialists, with the capitalist democracies playing both sides for geopolitics and profit. But as long as the American behemoth is in the neutral arbiter position rather than being one end of a dipole, they and any closely-aligned nations (say, Britain, Canada, maybe France) would have a lot of political weight that isn't fundamentally aligned in the grand conflict, and a less tense cold-war scenario is certainly a good thing.
 
I gotta say I absolutely love your inability to keep things simple with ideological and social movements, this TL is so much more than the usual tale of events and people, with all this attention to the history of ideas.

There's a lot to be hopeful about in the update - can Ethiopia navigate their new clientage relationship to hold onto internal autonomy while getting German investment that broadly raises the standard of living? Can the democratic consolidation of Haiti lead to a multi-party democracy with the parties in enough alignment to accept the democratic legitimacy of their opposition? Can Long's machine survive long enough to leave African-Americans with lasting political power across a portion of the South? Could we see an earlier, or perhaps instead a less intensely resisted, march towards civil rights? For example, if the cross-burners do a good enough job of alienating white america?

Even in all the grimness of many events in this update, I still find reasons to hope - in the imposed breakdown of traditional social structures in Kenya and South Africa, could we see the gelling of strong, unified anticolonialist movements?

Casting my eye even further to the future, without the red specter of communism, could we see a far safer world than OTL in the 50s and on? No CIA arming the colombian paras, no (or perhaps just fewer) CIA-backed corporatist banana republics, and the geopolitically-dominant socialist ideology not being a military-authoritarian-centralist one (and indeed, likely still, remembering the danger of bonapartism)... Ah who am I kidding, it'll be the integralists vs the socialists, with the capitalist democracies playing both sides for geopolitics and profit. But as long as the American behemoth is in the neutral arbiter position rather than being one end of a dipole, they and any closely-aligned nations (say, Britain, Canada, maybe France) would have a lot of political weight that isn't fundamentally aligned in the grand conflict, and a less tense cold-war scenario is certainly a good thing.
Dear me, where to start :D

I am happy to hear that you enjoy the socio-ideological side of the TL. One thing that has always fascinated me is the way that ideas and movements, particularly of an ideological nature, evolve over time. I found this absolutely magnificent book which explored the Reformation as it emerged, spread and diverged into hundreds of different movements, and one thing that I really wish I had access to when researching for this TL was a similar book exploring the development of socialism/communism/anarchism from its pre-Marxist beginnings and through to modern day (It would be a monolith of a tome, but it would be absolutely magical to read about the development of leftist ideology starting around the French Revolution maybe, and going from there - maybe with a bit of coverage for preceding movements). The way in which ideas and concepts morph and change over time and location depending on who is using what background source is utterly fascinating to me, and this TL is as much an exploration of that as anything else.

That is an interesting perspective - I hadn't quite sat down and thought of the Ethiopian fall to German influence in a positive light, but definitely something to consider. I do think that a German colonial presence there will play out very, very differently from the OTL Italian one. Haiti is in an interesting position and one of the places I am rather excited to see where things end up going. I am actually working on the immediate follow-on to events in Hispaniola right now, so it was very much on my mind as I was posting.

I am very interested to see what people think of events in the United States moving forward, particularly as Long takes more of a center stage and events I have been working towards reach their climax - and examining all the things that follow will be just as fun. I do think that America's confrontation with the darker parts of its history, society and culture are unlikely to be without its fireworks, but one thing that I can promise is that things will play out significantly different from OTL.

The famines and crises in East and South Africa are going to leave an indelible mark on the two regions. I don't know if the long-term impact will be for the better or worse as regards tribal identities and societal cohesion, but I can tell you that particularly East Africa is now seething with a deep and abiding hatred of the British - although they are unable to do much about it at the moment as they try to recover from the horrors they just went through.

I think you are making a rather grevious mistake if you think that just because Communism has a more equitable and inclusive outlook ITTL it will be viewed as less of a threat - in fact, I think that for many, the international Communist movement is viewed with at least as much fear and hostility as they faced IOTL - the main difference is just that many of the primary combatants against Communism fought themselves to exhaustion in Siberia during the early 1920s and felt that the threat had largely been contained when the Peace was signed. That this happy status quo was broken almost from the get-go is something many have regretted, but there has just been a patent lack of energy and willpower to confront the "threat".

Given my own predilections for overly complicated factional strife, intrigues and infighting I highly doubt we see something rosy like what you are describing :p

I do try to keep things balanced out to some degree - the world of ADiJ is not a crapsack world in which everything is depressing and horribly, but it does have its dark points. At the same time, however, it is not some utopia where everything works out and things are getting better on all sides. I want people to question and wonder whether they feel comfortable rooting for a German Social Democratic Empire pressing forward in the scientific field of eugenics. The authoritarian Huey Long as one of the foremost soldiers in the war for civil rights. A creeping integralist movement which brings with it quiet prosperity, but in the process strangles opposition and sets the framework for what could become a frightful powerblock.

I do find it interesting that you think the United States will be a neutral party in all of this though ;) .

Gonna leave off there...
 
I do find it interesting that you think the United States will be a neutral party in all of this though ;) .
Heh, I'll say I think it's more that the US will have divided sympathies, making it possible that it will align with either of the opposed blocs, or indeed thread some sort of neutral path. OTL American foreign policy supported anti-communist authoritarians as a bulwark against the USSR and to counter the economic nationalist, expropriative tendencies of socialist revolutions, so as to defend the foreign investments of American business.

Here, though, it seems to me like the integralists are also economic nationalists, which would cause friction with American business interests, and a socialist movement that's more willing to engage in market socialism and ideological pluralism might be able to accommodate a certain degree of foreign private investment. So, if international events push the US to align against the integralists, then America could probably find some sort of accommodation with the socialists, just like they found an uneasy accommodation with right-authoritarians OTL.

OTL of course, there was WWII that crushed the nascent right-authoritarian bloc, and then the US aligned strongly against a USSR that had just imposed communism on half of Europe, and was instigating revolution in the East, in the Americas, etc. So ITTL we might well see a similar course, where the capitalist democracies align with the socialists to crush an integralism that both see as radical and warmongering, and then in the division of spoils they come to loggerheads. But where the TL stands right now, I think it's possible that the world would continue to be multipolar long enough for each of the three 'blocs' to protect themselves with nuclear MAD. Then we really could see a cold war where the integralists and socialists are diametrically opposed, but the capitalist democracies variously align on different sides, in neutral positions, against both, or even with shifting alignments depending on the circumstance. Would that be a peaceful world? No, but it would certainly be interesting :p.
 
Update Thirty-Four (Pt. 2): Between Dreams and Nightmares
Between Dreams and Nightmares

Yrigoyen_en_ventanilla_del_ferrocarril_viaje_a_Santa_Fe_campa%C3%B1a_electoral_de_1926..jpg

President Hipólito Yrigoyen of Argentina

The Liberal, The Radical and the Socialist​

The collapse of the Tenentist Regime in Brazil had the effect of turning Brazil into a fundamentally anarchic state. Government authority shrank precipitously, and in many cases disappeared entirely, with the result that much of the country was left entirely ungoverned and ungovernable. All of Brazil's neighbors would exert some level of influence across the Brazilian border, ranging from simply maintaining relations with local authorities to outright occupation. Brazilian claims to the Amazon were set aside, as Peru, Venezuala and many others expanded into the vacuum that had emerged. Thus, while Júlio Prestes and Washington Luís were able to establish themselves in Rio de Janeiro and gradually extended their control across the coastal provinces, the majority of the country remained in anarchy. The collapse and flight of the tenentists into the interior would allow for the development of some form of regional governmental authority as Luís Carlos Prestes and Antônio de Siqueira Campos worked in concert to reestablish the collapsed regime in Mato Grosso, developing ties with the Socialist Republic of Chile and asking for their aid in hopes of building up the interior as a counterpoint to the Old Republican forces.

As the Old Republic began to reassert its authority over the south, it came into contact with a regional alliance of liberals and populists led by Osvaldo Aranha, the former right-hand man of Getulio Vargas - a prominent politician from Rio Grande do Sul who had emerged as a powerful political figure prior to and during the Tenentist Regime as an accepted but vocal opponent of the more radical tenentist policies, before dying in the chaos surrounding the collapse of the Tenentists. The unification of the far south, led by Aranha, with the Old Republic based in Minas Gerais and Sao Paolo in 1929 significantly strengthened the resurgent Old Republic but also introduced a new internal dynamic which was to characterize the reborn Old Republic - namely the divide between the urban, liberal and industrial southerners and the rural, conservative plantation-oriented Mineiros and Paulians. Furthermore, it also brought to a close the period of total dominance exerted by Júlio Prestes and Washington Luís over the Old Republic as not only southern liberals but also their fellow conservatives began to grow restless under the provisional government.

With actual military might dispersed at the local level, the national military having been first weakened and then effectively dissolved during the Tenentist rise and fall, the government lacked any ability to really hold onto power when their backers began to demand an end to the provisional government. The result of these pressures was to be the hastily organized Brazilian Elections of 1930 in which a mishmash of regional parties with little true ideological differences were voted into power - Brazilian politics being of a distinctly regional rather than ideological nature under the Old Republican system. The presidency was handed over to the Paulista Washington Luís while Osvaldo Aranha was confirmed as Vice President, Minister of Finance and Minister of Industry to provide representation to both sides. However, this broke with the long-established precedent of the Milk-and-Coffee settlement between the politicians of Sao Paolo and Minas Gerais, whereby the two states would alternate presidents and vice-presidents and instead saw the two states forcibly combined with a resultant loss of power while the southerners of Rio Grande do Sul and its neighbouring states took over the role as the secondary party in the arrangement. This new settlement would come to be known as the Milk-and-Steel Settlement, in an effort to deliberately echo the past agreement.

By this time, the Tenentists had secured firm control of Mato Grosso and to a lesser degree had made inroads into the Northeastern coastal region, challenging the Old Republicans for control of Bahia and the other states of the region. While clashes were inevitable, the two Brazilian powers avoided direct contact as far as possible and only rarely entered into open violent exchanges. It was during this time that divisions amongst the tenentists also began to emerge as Luís Carlos Prestes and Antônio de Siqueira Campos grew ever closer to their Socialist Chilean compatriots, while Eduardo Gomes proved reluctant to cooperate with foreigners and felt disquieted by the fact that the movement was sliding ever further to the left. The matter finally came to a head in 1929, when Gomes resigned from office and went into exile in Argentina after it became clear that he would need to use violence upon his one-time allies to shift tenentist policy.

This development allowed Siqueira Campos to strengthen his grip as leader of the movement further, with Luis Prestes in a more supporting role. It is here that it becomes important to note the divergent ideological position of these two tenentist leaders, for while both increasingly came to espouse Communism, Siqueira Campos fell further and further into the Trotskyite camp, believing that the failures of the tenentist government originated in their failures to act as proper revolutionaries, in effect holding the opinion that the Tenentist Regime had failed due to their decision to maintain too much of the Old Republic structures, allowing the remnants of the Old Republic to maintain power and accepting the liberals of the south as active parties in Brazilian politics. By contrast, Luis Prestes first came under the influence of Muscovite Communism before shifting onto a more Italian bent under the influence of an Italian RCC confessor he had met in Chile, coming to believe that their failures in government stemmed from a failure of leadership, not of ideology or plan. He grew into a firm supporter of the Revolutionary Catholic Church and of the broad-based socialism which had been embraced by Gramsci and increasingly by his Chileans allies.

This divergence, while remaining a hidden tension for years, resulted in increasingly volatile clashes between the two principal leaders of the movement, as Luis Prestes pressed for a decentralisation of the authority held by the top level of the Tenentist government in favour of more local and regional power and representation, while Siqueira Campos insisted on the establishment of a Unitary state system in which the tenentist government could fully put into action its revolutionary principles. This clash finally boiled over in 1933, when Siqueira Campos as President of the Provisional Brazilian Revolutionary Republic unilaterally had Luis Prestes removed from his various posts, ejecting him from leadership. Fears that this breach between the two old friends would end in civil war rose rapidly, as the supporters of either camp rose to the defence of their leaders, but unwilling to bring ruin to their troubled cause, Luis Prestes instead chose to go into exile, travelling to and settling down in Chile alongside an ever growing number of fellow Brazilian émigrés (13).

While the Milk-and-Steel Settlement had helped resolve the immediate problems faced by the resurgent Old Republic, and the very presence of actual government authority was welcomed broadly, it did not resolve the underlying issues which had led to the Tenentist Revolts in the first place. As Siqueira Campos, now in position as the sole leader of the Tenentists in Brazil, turned away from the relatively non-confrontational approach previously taken by the Tenentists and towards far more volatile measures in hopes of securing Bahia, and with it the Northeast, these old issues began bubbling up within the Old Republic once more. With violent clashes exploding in the Northeast, the Old Republic was forced to dispatch ever more troops into the chaos while Luís Washington turned ever further towards authoritarian rule in order to maintain peace and order, in the process significantly strengthening ties to Portugal and the Integralist leadership of Sidonio Pais. This growing conflict and authoritarian turn by the government placed an ever greater strain on the constituent states of the Old Republic and spurred on simmering local resentments.

As matters in Bahia grew ever more heated over the course of 1934, the situation began to collapse in the southern and central coastal provinces. Ultimately, it would be the mutiny of conscript soldiers being shipped north through Minas Gerais from Paraná which triggered what came to be known as the Constitutional Revolution. However, while the revolution was triggered by mutinous troops in Minas Gerais, it would be the southern liberals, most prominently Antônio Borges de Medeiros, who in turn convinced Osvaldo Aranha, who ended up forcing the change. Marshalling the local national guard even as mutinous conscripts across the country turned their guns on their Old Republican officers, the South made its push towards political dominance. Issuing an ultimatum that the demands of the people be addressed in full, the revolutionary leadership wished to enforce the calling of a constitutional convention in order to draft a new constitution for Brazil which would be capable of addressing the major social and political challenges facing it.

Never particularly popular, it was not long before Luís Washington saw his support collapse entirely, forcing him to follow his predecessors of the Old Republic into exile once more, with barely a drop of blood shed in the process. Mustering support from Paulists reformers such as Pedro Manuel de Toledo, Euclides Figueiredo and Júlio de Mesquita Filho and with the relatively popular but non-threatening Aranha as Provisional President until a constitution could be assembled, the Constitutionalists emerged unscathed and victorious - Aranha halting offensive operations in Bahia until matters of the constitution could be resolved. Uniquely, the new constitution was written from scratch by directly elected deputies from across the political spectrum, including a newly arrived Luis Prestes and Eduardo Gomes, who brought with them a lot of their old tenente supporters to legitimize the resultant constitution.

The result was a revolutionary constitution which granted complete independence to the Supreme Court of Brazil while subordinating all other courts to it, extended political and voting rights to all Brazilians regardless of sex or race, introduced proportional voting for elections, in effect replacing regionalist politics with those of ideology, created an electoral court to supervise the fairness of elections answering to the independent Supreme Court, codified freedoms of speech, religion, movement and assembly alongside the basic rights of life, freedom and property while establishing a whole host of social rights to go alongside the political and civil rights. These included a national minimum wage, an eight-hour work day, mandatory weekly rests, paid vacations, indemnities for unmotivated firings and much more. In effect, it in one move turned the moribund Old Republic into one of the most progressive states in the world, a system of government which was to become known as the New Republic in the years to come.

New political parties sprouted up in response to these developments, even as regionalist affiliations were abandoned, the Liberal Party, the Conservative Party, the Christian Democratic Party, the National Republican Party, the Social Democratic Party and the Socialist Party, to mention but the largest and most significant emerging within a couple years. Elections held in 1935 would return the Liberal Party of Aranha to government, with him serving as Prime Minister while the much older Pedro Manuel de Toledo was elected to the much weakened post of President. With a good portion of the old tenentist movement now backing the New Republic, it did not take long before Siqueira Campos' positions back to crumble, his authoritarian approach leading to escalating accusations of Bonapartism and dissatisfaction as Trotskyite Communism experienced a precipitous loss of prestige and legitimacy following the Trotskyite Affair. With support for his cause collapsing, Siqueira Campos retreated ever further into the interior, until finally in late 1936 he vanished into the Amazon Jungle accompanied by a few thousand hardened and dedicated supporters (14).

The Socialist Republic of Chile was at once a stalwart of the revolutionary cause in Latin America and one of the least revolutionary countries in the Americas. Under the leadership of Marmaduque Grove, the young republic had set out on a revolutionary course, setting up what was on paper one of the most revolutionary states in the Americas. It was a major supporter of the tenente movement in Brazil and of other left-wing movements across Latin America, and their favourite place of exile. However, in comparison to most of the other leftist governments which had come to power during the 1920s, it was almost surprisingly conservative in nature. As a state formed on the back of a coup and led by a mixed military-civilian government, the young republic lacked much in the way of governing legitimacy, a fact which the government's critics were more than willing to highlight on numerous occasions.

This state of affairs was something not only observed by the new regime's detractors, but also by its membership itself. Having come to power in 1925, the ruling authorities remained hesitant when the question of securing democratic support for the government came up, knowing full well the strong support enjoyed by particularly the Liberal and Radical parties who would be the most pressing competitors to the ruling Socialist Party in any election. The military figures in government were also themselves disconcerted with the idea of surrendering leadership of a republic for which they had paid dearly in blood and as such proved rather intransigent when the topic emerged. Despite this lack of democratic legitimacy, the government proved itself a relatively competent and decent sort, giving wide latitude to their political opponents, particularly as regarded freedoms of the press, and embarked on one of the most successful land reform campaigns of the period, setting limits on land ownership while negotiating settlements with oligarchic land owners to sell off their excess land to their poor neighbours at low state-subsidised prices. The government proved more interventionist than many in the past, securing firm control of the state finances and, while American investments proved few and far between, the government was able to find willing investors in Europe, particularly in Germany where the rapidly expanding cartels spied an easy entry into the Latin American market.

However, by 1930 the continued lack of democratic accountability finally proved too much, and public protests emerged across much of the country. Before matters could get too far out of hand, the government gave in to the demands and issued elections for later in the year. For events to get to this point, it had proven necessary for the brewing disagreements within the ruling Socialist Party to finally came to a head, as divisions between moderates and radicals of varying communist alignments had led to bitter intra-party conflict throughout the preceding half-decade. At the heart of this conflict were Carlos Dávila, a fierce proponent of Trotskyite Communism, Marmaduque Grove, who increasingly held beliefs inspired by Muscovite Communism, and Luis Emilio Recabarren, the original founder of the Communist Party and a man of strongly Italian Communist beliefs who had united his party with the governing Socialist Party in 1926.

While Marmaduque held leadership of the party and was the best known of the government figures, his actual support was based primarily on the military had he had only a limited following within the party itself. Recabarren, while an incredibly talented thinker and writer, was a sensitive personality and had proven himself unsuited to the bitterly fractious nature of party politics, instead preferring to remain in the background when possible, but despite, or perhaps because of, this he was the man with the greatest level of backing within the party and the greatest proponent of strengthening the democratic legitimacy of the government within the party. By contrast, Dávila believed that what was needed was not more voices in the room, muddying up decision-making and slowing government business to a crawl, but rather a firm dedication to furthering the revolutionary cause.

It was for this reason that Dávila and his followers, containing many of the most talented politicians within the party itself, believed that instead of backsliding into the mediocrity of the early 20th century, the party should instead grasp hold of the major challenges facing their country and resolve them by any means necessary. A gifted speaker, Dávila was able to rouse the passions of thousands who were swept along by his portrayal of a powerful, activist government seeking to further the revolutionary cause and better the lives of all poor Chileans without regard for reactionary and liberal whining, running roughshod over the oligarchy which still held such incredible power and influence even under what was putatively a "Socialist" republic. While Dávila would continue to claim that the unrest which led the Socialist Party to call for elections was caused by the failure of the government to act as a revolutionary force in Chile, he nevertheless gave way in the face of considerable pressure from the two other wings of the party, which both welcomed the elections with hope and trepidation.

Ultimately, the election would play out peacefully and with seeming equitability, the opposition parties having been permitted representatives on the election supervision board, and would prove Recabarren's faction right. The Socialists secured victory by a considerable margin, with the center-left Radicals proving the second largest party in government, followed distantly by the Liberals and Conservatives, the latter of whom had lost much of their political heft in the face of universal suffrage and demonstrations that their fear-mongering about Communist rule was just that, fearmongering.

The next governing period would gradually see the Recabarren wing of the Socialist Party weaken in its support, with Dávila riding high on the proof of his theories being proven right by Trotsky's growing international standing, although during this period Dávilla shifted away from his more anti-democratic positions, and towards something more reminiscent of a blended Muscovite-Trotskyite position - most defined by its calls for radical government action, as contrasted with Recabarren's constant pleas for moderation. Even Trotsky's fall from grace would prove insufficient to halt Dávila's growing support within the party, and when Marmaduque stepped down as leader of the party following a contested election of the party leadership in preparations for the equally successful late 1934 Chilean elections, Dávila was able to step into his post as both President of Chile and Leader of the Chilean Socialist Party (15).

In 1916, the conservative regime which had dominated politics in Argentina since the 1880s came to an end with the election of Hipólito Yrigoyen and the Radical Civic Union. While the succeeding decade was marked by its ups and downs, with the Tragic Week of January 1919, when an attempted general strike by the Argentine Regional Workers' Federation was crushed brutally by the police and military, marking a major low point and the passing of the Labor Code of 1921 which established the right to strike, implemented minimum wage laws and collective contrast and various other efforts in the early 20s marking a high point, there was no way of doubting that Argentina was in an ever-improving situation during these years. The Radical government's aim of avoiding class struggle through social conciliation seemed to be working, with a sluggish economy at the start of the decade giving way to an ever more intensely booming one later in the decade fuelled by a policy of Land and Oil in which the state took a decisive interventionist role in the strengthening of the economy, amongst other actions establishing the Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales by nationalizing Argentina's oil companies.

Yrigoyen, never a man prone to dialogue and negotiations when it came to his opponents, proved a decisive but divisive leader, possessing a very direct style of leadership in which his ministers were permitted little autonomy, while he constantly brow-beat governors into line with his goals. At the heart of the matter lay the Radical Civic Union's internal divisions between the Blues, the more conservative members with upper middle-class social origins primarily from the City of Buenos Aires and the Grays, who were of a more populist bent and mostly from the lower middle-class and the Province of Buenos Aires. Yrigoyen, as the nephew of the party's founder Leandro Alem, had always been at the center of party politics and had fallen increasingly in with the younger, more radical, Grays while Alem and his followers largely fell into the camp of the Blues. When Alem had ended his leadership of the party, Yrigoyen had moved in to replace him, bringing with him the large faction of Grays which had developed around the young leader, partially displacing the sitting Blue members to their considerable outrage. Yrigoyen's leadership had been contentious ever since, with bitter strife between Blues and Grays on more than one occasion, but eventually his leadership had led the party to power.

However, with Yrigoyen acting independently of the party at which he sat as head, he soon came under increasingly vocal accusation of personalism and anti-party tendencies, claims which had surrounded Yrigoyen from the day he first rose to power within the party and which had been used to contrast him unfavourably with the far less domineering Alem. This conflict finally came to a head leading into the 1922 elections in which the Blues rallied around the aristocratic Marcelo Torcuato de Alvear and sought to depose Yrigoyen. However, without any specific charge to levy at Yrigoyen, the attempt floundered, allowing Yrigoyen to secure victory once again, in the process defeating Norberto Pinero's Conservatives by a margin of 3:1. Never the less, the more fervently anti-Yrigoyen Blues would establish the Anti-Personalist Radical Civic Union in 1923, led by Roberto Ortiz and Alvear, while in 1924 two parallel radical committees would be established by the Blues and Grays to contest for control of the City of Buenos Aires, further worsening the fissures of the Radicals.

However, this resistance to Yrigoyen and his fellow Grays would increasingly flounder in the face of a booming economy. As economic growth exploded during the second Yrigoyen term, he found himself ever more convinced that his course of action was the correct one and came to rely almost entirely upon himself, eschewing the advice of others when they contradicted his own beliefs, including his fellow Grays. During this period Yrigoyen's efforts at intervention in provincial affairs took on an unheard pace, breaking apart the feudal oligarchies which still governed some provinces, while his resistance to other political forces hardened considerably, with everyone from the Anti-Personalists and other rival Radical factions to the Progressive Democrats and Socialists on the left, as well as the National Concentration of the Conservative Opposition and their fellows on the right, finding themselves the target of increasing marginalisation and eventually violent repression.

During these years the one-time unity of the Gray faction of Radicals began to collapse as well, as support for the left-wing of the Radical movement, the Lencinistas and Bloquistas most prominently, grew into an active threat to the Yrigoyenista leadership, which was itself turning steadily away from its leftist roots and towards the right. However, despite Yrigoyen's collapsing popularity he was able to scrape together enough support to win a third term in the 1928 elections, most of his lost support having shifted further leftward towards the Lencinistas in particular.

This growing threat to Yrigoyen's leadership was to provoke an attempted assassination of Senator Carlos Washington Lencinas, the most prominent of the Lencinistas, by a pro-Yrigoyen group in November of 1929, an action so audacious that it drew national recrimination and claims that Yrigoyen himself had ordered the attack. This sentiment was further strengthened when Yrigoyen intervened in the Lencinista-dominated province of Mendoza barely a week after the assassination attempt. With sentiment turning rapidly against Yrigoyen as the 1920s neared their end, the matter was suddenly and violently sidetracked when barely a month after the failed attack on Lencinas, on the 24th of December 1929, an anarchist attacked Yrigoyen as he was leaving his home, shooting three bullets into the president's car, before the presidential guard could return fire, killing the assassin. However, it would prove to be too late for the great man of Argentina who now lay dead, slain by an assassin's bullet (16).

The sudden and shocking assassination of Hipólito Yrigoyen in late December of 1929 sent shock and horror through Argentina. Despite his flaws, there was little doubt that Yrigoyen had helped bring Argentina to a position of economic prosperity and that he had held the best interests of the nation at heart. His death was met with great public mourning, even his former enemies coming out to loquaciously praise his deeds while condemning the violence which had taken his life. However, the question of who and how Yrigoyen should be succeeded was to become a point of considerable contention in the period that followed. While Enrique Martínez, Yrigoyen's Vice President, succeeded Yrigoyen as President, he lacked the following, charisma and domineering personality which had allowed Yrigoyen to so dominate political affairs in Argentina, and as a result soon saw his position undermined by various rivals.

The heart of the conflict which followed was to be between the Yrigoyenista Elpido Martínez, advocating a continuation of Yrigoyen's semi-authoritarian personalist approach by the government, the Anti-Personalist Roberto M. Ortiz, who wished to build ties with the moderate right-wing in a more widely embracing coalition government which avoided most of Yrigoyen's more interventionist attitudes, and finally Carlos Washington Lencinas, who brought together a wider coalition of centrist and left-leaning Radicals from both the Yrigoyenist Radical Civic Union, the Bloquistas and his own Lencinistas, with hopes of cooperating with the Democratic Progressives and moderate Socialists in pushing Argentina onto a more leftist political orientation.

With Brazil collapsing into anarchy during this period, resulting in numerous exiles crossing into Argentina, the fears that Argentina might descend into the same sort of bloody chaos as its neighbours weighed heavily on all parties and resulted in a relatively tranquil conflict, lacking the bloody bite which Yrigoyen had brought to the political clashes of the last couple years. Ultimately, President Gonzàlez would find himself little more than a figure-head ruler, as the three Radical factions fought over control of the various ministries and prepared for the elections of 1932. The result was that the two year period between Yrigoyen's assassination and the elections was marked by political chaos, as ministries acted with great independence, often colliding in clashes over jurisdictions and authorities, with the most ambitious and talented ministers making the most of the period to the detriment of their less active peers.

However, this period also saw a marked rise in corruption, as the lack of control and oversight left the state rife for plundering and bad-faith actions, with the Agricultural Ministry under Luis Duhai proving particularly notorious, drawing the scorn of the highly respected founder and leader of the Democratic Progressive Party, Lisandro de la Torre, who openly condemned the minister on the Senate floor. Argentinian provinces were left to govern themselves, as Gonzàlez lacked the will to intervene in their affairs, resulting in an increasingly disjointed development of the country, with the northern and north-western provinces, in which the Lencinistas and Bloquistas predominated, basically embarking on their own governing politics while in the south Conservatives took over the governance of several provinces through intimidation and threats.

Finally, the 1932 Elections came about, in which the three radical alliances set out to compete alongside their respective allies. The result was a complete collapse for the Yrigoyenista faction, whose support shrank precipitously without the leadership and charisma of their name-sake. Instead, it would be a clash between the Lencinista and Antipersonalista factions which dominated the elections alongside their respective coalition allies, with the race too close to tell for days, as every last ballot was counted. Finally, it would be determined that the Lencinistas and the Left-Radical Coalition under Carlos Washington Lencinas had emerged victorious with a slight margin of victory, which was further extended when the Yrigoyenistas joined the coalition.

The result was the establishment of a firmly left-leaning Radical government under Carlos Washington Lencinas, whose three brothers José Hipólito, Rafael and Antulio all came to play a key role in the new government, José Hipólito as Governor of Mendoza, Rafael as Minister of Health and Antulio as his brother's Chief-of-Staff, alongside the two brothers leading the Bloquistas, Federico and Aldo Cantoni, the former serving as Minister of Finance and the latter as Minister of Labour. Finally, in an effort to bring peace back to the Radical Civic Union, Lencinas offered Marcelo de Alvear the position as Foreign Minister - hoping that his aristocratic bearing and diplomatic experience would help furnish the government with an acceptable outward appearance to its trade partners in Europe. The new government soon developed friendly relations with the Marmaduque government in Chile and, following the Constitutional Revolution in Brazil, with the new democratic government of that country - creating a Radical-Socialist power bloc which was to dominate the southern half of the continent for the remainder of the 1930s. The new government was swift to pass women's suffrage into law, established significant social programs to benefit the poor and working classes, aided in the development of the state economy, and finally began to challenge the dominance of the oligarchy which had held sway over Argentina for centuries (17).

Footnotes:
(13) The 20s and 30s in Brazil of OTL are a complicated but fascinating period in time during which near-constant revolts and political upheaval forced an end to the Old Republic and brought about periods of instability, populism and dictatorship. I have chosen to kill of Vargas ITTL in order to allow a less power-hungry and unscrupulous figure to emerge at the head of the southern Liberals and have largely maintained many of the dynamics of the Old Republic, if under new and complicated circumstances. The Milk-and-Steel Settlement is a sign of acceptance by the heart of the Old Republic that the south must be given a voice in government if it is to remain stable. It is worth noting that during the chaos of the Tenente period, the south was one of the most stable regions in the entire country and as such enjoyed a great deal of migration from both immigrants and internal migrants, greatly boosting the provinces' populations and turning them into the industrial heartland of Brazil. At the same time we see that the Tenentist movement continues, falling ever further onto a communist track while solidifying and consolidating under the sole leadership of Siqueira Campos, who comes to hold a super-dominant position within the Tenente movement while brushing aside old friends and rivals in the process.

(14) Sorry about this closing out so quickly, but I do hope that these developments make sense. By the time of the Constitutional Revolution it has been more than a decade since the Tenente Revolution, with Brazil having basically been in a state of more or less anarchy since then. That, coupled with significantly changed political perceptions from the ongoing crisis and fears of Brazil falling entirely under Integralist rule, are sufficient to prompt major action. It is worth noting that the constitution as I have laid it out is very close to the OTL Brazilian Constitution of 1934, the difference here is that there isn't someone like Vargas looking to undermine the system from the ground up. Instead, Brazil finally falls onto a more sustainable, democratic path forward and bids farewell to its long and troubled period as an oligarchic republic.

To be clear, the Liberal Party is strongest in the south and is basically a continuation of the prior southern Liberal movement. The Conservatives are largely former supporters of the Old Republic who have accepted the changed circumstances under the New Republic. The Christian Democratic Party is a Papal Catholic center-right party not officially integralist, but willing to follow papal instructions either way - more in line with Spanish Integralism and with a minority of its members open to the restoration of the monarchy under Prince Pedro Henrique. The National Republican Party is an out-and-out Portuguese Integralist party, which wants much closer ties to Portugal and a new constitution more along the lines of the Portuguese Sidonist constitution. The Social Democratic party is led by Eduardo Gomes and is a social reform party while the Socialist Party is led by Luis Carlos Prestes and falls along Italian Communist lines, including support for the growing Revolutionary Catholic Church. Siqueira Campos ends up disappearing into the jungle, with no one really knowing what has happened to him and his followers at least for the time being.

(15) In Chile we see a government which starts off with about as little revolutionary zeal as can be mustered by a revolutionary party gradually adopt increasingly radical positions. Marmaduque, having stayed in power for nearly a decade, finally steps down to give way for the much more activist leadership of Carlos Dávila. It is worth noting that in the OTL revolutionary Socialist Republic of Chile in 1932, Marmaduque ended up getting kicked out of leadership by Dávila - who in turn acted far too radically for most. I should also mention here that Luis Recabarren does not commit suicide in response to Central Committee recrimination following the 1924 crises, and as such is able to recover mentally enough to bring his party into the Socialist Party - remaining a prominent voice amongst the more moderate members of the party. Finally, we also see that while economic growth is not quite up to the level of the OTL pre-Great Depression period, the entry of German cartels into the market does help spur on economic development considerably.

(16) The major divergence in Argentina comes about when Yrigoyen is able to stave off Blue pressure to surrender his leadership of the party, which in turn prevents Alvear from taking up the presidency from him. The reason for this is that IOTL the anti-Personalists were able to criticise Yrigoyen for his unwillingness to sanction the Soviet Union, a matter which is not really worth discussing in 1922 given the ongoing Russian Civil War and the Siberian White rule of the Far-East ITTL. As such, the anti-personalists are unable to form a clear argument to oppose Yrigoyen's rule and he is able to hold on to power. He makes a similar turn towards authoritarianism as IOTL, with the increasing violent repression of his rivals, it is honestly a rather sad fall from grace reading about it IOTL. The final major divergences are that the assassination of Carlos Washington Lencista ends up failing and that the OTL assassination attempt on Yrigoyen ends up succeeding, sending politics firmly off the rails of OTL. It is worth noting that Yrigoyen was overthrown in a coup in 1930, leading to the establishment of a military dictatorship, which in turn gave way to an ever more tumultuous political situation under semi-dictatorial presidents which gradually saw the country regress into authoritarian rule. It should also be mentioned that the lack of a Great Depression in the late 20s and early 30s mean that economic prosperity continues and the international trade on which Argentina is wholly reliant remains as a driver of the economy.

(17) Argentina avoids the Infamous Decade of OTL, with the military remaining in the background politically for the time being. Instead we see Argentina slowly fall onto a line of development relatively similar to that emerging in Chile and Brazil, although under the banner of Radical rule rather than Socialist or Liberal governments of Chile and Brazil. Despite holding putatively different ideological backgrounds, there are a lot of similarities between the three regimes and they prove quite friendly towards each other.

963px-1917_Silent_Parade%2C_drummers.png

The Silent Parade protesting Lynching in the United States

A Troubled Nation​

While the late 1920s and early 1930s were marked by political gridlock and partisanship it was also a period of near un-precedented social agitation, as the American citizen was increasingly urged to engage actively in political, cultural and social movements, aided by the mobilising capabilities of mass media, particularly Radio. By the end of the decade, most households had acquired some form of radio and eagerly tuned in to listen to radio personalities of all sorts, from the demagoguery of Charles Coughlin and race baiting of D.C. Stephenson to the preaching of Reverend M. J. Divine or the singing of Bing Crosby. Like never before, there was a developing common culture and points of reference which pulled together the far-flung nation for good and bad. Even some politicians took to the air waves, most prominently the bombastic Huey Long, who bombarded his listeners with incredible bouts of oratory often targeting the Klan or his political rivals, on rare occasions lasting for hours on end, to the shocked delight of many of his followers.

However, Huey Long was but the most visible figure in the growing struggle against the Ku Klux Klan, Lynching and Segregation. Organizations like the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the Anti-Defamation League as well as more radical organizations such as the Industrial Workers of the World and the People's Liberty Union (PLU) under Norman Thomas, which had been established in 1927 with the aim of continuing the work of the outlawed American Civil Liberties Union, dedicated to the cause numbered in the dozens. The sentiment and support of these organizations, and the general movement as a whole, grew considerably in these years, particularly as the bitter and bloody conflict between Black Guard and Indiana Klan in Ohio and Indiana drew national attention and condemnation of the regional Klans as little better than murderous hooligans. The weakening support for the Klan allowed particularly the PLU to emerge as one of the staunchest and most vocal opponents of the organizations, attacking the Klan and their supporters wherever they could find them - amongst their accomplishments being a slew of resignations in Pennsylvania after the PLU secured a membership list of the state Klan, including prominent state senators, sheriffs and various other officials and business figures.

However, this struggle was far from one sided, for in addition to the hyper-active Klan leadership there were other conservative groups, such as the American Legion, the National Civic Federation, the Industrial Defense Association and the Anti-Communist League, who worked in concert to oppose the rising tide of progressivism wherever they found it (18). It is notable that the 1920s and early 30s were to prove amongst the most prolific in the number of instances, scale and grotesqueness of lynchings perpetrated against the African American populace and their sundry allies and compatriots in discrimination. This state of affairs was to gradually bring the issue to national attention, soon becoming a topic of bitter partisanship, rhetoric and propaganda on all sides. In many ways these developments could be traced back to the Great War and the events surrounding it both domestically and in foreign lands.

The single most notable development was the mass mobilisation, training and veteran experience which significant portions of the African American male population acquired as part of their participation in the Great War, and as significantly the fear and uncertainty which these new experiences engendered in their white neighbors. Even before the end of the Great War there had been trouble, demonstrated in the Camp Logan Mutiny of 1917, wherein soldiers of the all-black Twenty-Fourth United States Infantry Regiment ended up in an open clash with members of the Houston Police Department and the white citizenry after harsh harassment by both of the soldiers and the local black community.

One of many such riots and massacres, what set the Camp Logan Mutiny apart was the resistance of the black soldiers to White power and authority. Significantly more calamitous was the Red Summer of 1919, in which riots, massacres and open clashes between white and black communities on a nation-wide basis gripped the nation. The result of post-Great War social tensions as demobilization of both black and white soldiers collided with an economic crisis, labor unrest and increased competition, the events of the Summer of 1919 simply laying the ground work for the horrors to follow. The bloody sack of the Greenwood district of Tulsa, Oklahoma, saw the wealthiest black community in the United States burned to the ground as white mobs descended on the district in repeated attacks with arms provided by city officials. Once again resistance on the part of the black populace, specifically the rallying of a group of armed black men to protect another black man imprisoned on flimsy charges and likely to be lynched, culminated in a firefight between white rioters and the black men. This had played a role in igniting the rage and violence of the white populace, who descended on the well known district with incredible violence and brutality, turning everything from rifles and machineguns to strafing airplanes against the African American population of Greenwood. Ultimately around ten thousand African Americans would be left homeless, more than a hundred killed and many more injured gravely, while an incredible amount of Black wealth accumulated through the hard work of past generations went up in flames (19).

As the 1920s continued on, racially-motivated violence exploded on numerous occasions, for example in December of 1922 when the small town of Perry, Florida saw a lynching victim burned at the state while a crowd of onlookers collected souvenirs before two more black men were shot and hanged, before the town's black school, Masonic lodge, church, amusement hall and several families houses were set ablaze. This was succeeded the following month by the Rosewood Massacre. Rosewood, a Florida town populated primarily by black people, was a quiet self-sufficient whistle stop on the Seaboard Air Line Railway which was effectively destroyed by a mob of hundreds. Having set out to comb through the countryside in a hunt on black people after rumors of accusations that a white woman had been assaulted by a black drifter circulated, the mob set upon any dark-skinned person they came across. Dozens were killed in the escalating violence as the black community of Rosewood to defend itself, culminating in the sacking and razing of the town by hundreds of perpetrators, with the survivors of the massacre fleeing into the surrounding brush in fear for their lives.

These circumstances would only get worse over the course of the decade as the rise of the Ku Klux Klan fuelled anti-black sentiment in the south, resulting in a steadily growing number of lynchings and massacres which were rarely reported on by the national media, and even when they were brought to light, often in disparaging terms which played the black victims as the aggressors. Tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of African Americans, faced with this escalating violence sought refuge in the north and west - participating in a grand migration which was to bring the issue of white-and-black relations to the rest of the country. Many towns in the Midwest and West adopted "sundown" warnings, threatening to kill any African American who remained overnight with the town limits, while more expelled what black occupants who had settled into those northern towns during Reconstruction. The rise of the Indiana Klan, and the Klan in the North more generally, was in part fueled by these developments, and resulted in violent clashes throughout this period. Gradually, as figures like Huey Long, Jessie Daniel Ames, Reinhold Niebuhr and other anti-Klan figures rose to national prominence, the plight of the African-American gradually found its way into the national discourse and news of lynching incidents grew into a constant drum beat, the mood of the nation gradually turned against the Klan and Lynching as a practice.

During this period organizations like the PLU, the International Labor Defense, the NAACP and other important legal defence organisations began to emerge and to organise in support of ending lynching as a semi-accepted practice. This was most prominently demonstrated by the failed reintroduction of the 1918 and 1922 Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill for debate in 1929, and the even more radical and inflammatory Long-Costigan Anti-Lynching Bill in 1932, which was included as a core part of the Progressive Party platform and nearly passed the Senate through the cooperation Progressive and Republican senators. By the start of the 1930s the way in which lynching had been condoned in the name of protecting white women finally drew condemnation from a collection of prominent Southern women, who assembled in Atlanta in late 1930 to condemn the practice of lynching, establishing the Association of Southern Women for the Prevention of Lynching under the leadership of the charismatic Jessie Daniel Ames, bringing a renewed spotlight to the issue and challenging the traditional narrative surrounding the practice of lynching to a degree rarely before experienced amongst the white population of the South.

However, it would be the nationally covered miscarriage of justice in the case of the Scottsboro Boys in 1931 which truly caused a shift in attitudes and highlighted the gross inequities of the United States legal system in regards to dealing with African Americans. Notable for its all-white juries, rushed trial and disruptive mobs which nearly saw the case pre-empted by a mass lynching, the case proved notorious, particularly when brought up by national anti-lynching and anti-Klan campaigners. The naming and shaming of participants in lynching incidents, as well as the graphic description of the actions of lynch mobs at Huey Long's political rallies were to both bring a spot light to the issue and elevate Huey Long to public enemy #1 for those opposed to his anti-Klan policies. As the electioneering period grew ever nearer and the battle for the nomination reached a fever pitch in the early months of 1932, the issue of relations with the African-American population, the violent bigotry of the Klan and its excesses as well as the institutionalized racism of particularly the Deep South all became key points in the election campaigns of many of the candidates (20).

The electoral conventions of June 1932 were to prove themselves hectic affairs, with considerable politicking and controversy. The first convention to come under way would prove to be that of the Republicans, eager to secure a head start to the election campaign to come and with a well defined idea of who would lead them as Presidential Candidate. The failure of Frank Lowden to secure electoral victory in 1928 had significantly soured feelings between the two major camps of the party and seen the far more progressive Charles Curtis emerge as the favoured candidate for 1932. A member of the Kaw Nation, born in the Kansas Territory, Curtis was one of the first people with significant Native American ancestry to campaign on behalf of one of the major parties for the presidency. A man of considerable popularity on the national stage and a strong leader in the Senate, Curtis had served in the senate since 1906, and in senior legislative positions since 1915, helping to shape Republican policy, legislation and objectives on a fundamental level for decades. By 1932 Curtis was 72 years old and regarded as the single most powerful and prominent figure in the Republican Caucus, having surpassed Frank Lowden following Lowden's electoral defeat in 1928, and was thus swiftly voted as Presidential candidate.

However, Curtis' advanced age made the matter of his Vice Presidential candidate one of vital importance and considerable competition. Curtis' own preference was to have the highly regarded Charles Evans Hughes, who had served for a time as a justice on the Supreme Court with honor and even been a presidential candidate for the Republicans in 1916. However, Hughes was only two years younger than Curtis himself, and many feared that their rival parties would make a great deal of the issue. Instead, the party began to search for a younger candidate who would better compliment Curtis' image as an elder statesman - resulting in the emergence of the Wisconsin US Senator John James Blaine, the Klan-affiliated Governor of Indiana Edward L. Jackson and the famed humanitarian Herbert Clark Hoover as potential candidates. Blaine was considered more conservative than Curtis while presenting the opportunity to challenge the Progressives' grip on the Western states and was welcomed by many, although others felt him a rather bland choice with little to show in the way of major accomplishments to adorn the ticket. By contrast, Jackson would bring a great deal of character to the ticket, for good and ill, but when Curtis heard the idea he proved vocal in his disgust with the idea, reporters later writing that he had questioned why Jackson was even accepted as a member of the party, a statement which would result in Jackson and the wider Klan-affiliated elements of the Republican Party departing for the Democratic Party in angry protest at their removal from contention, not only angry at the statement but also disgusted by the idea of a half-Native American candidate for President. Finally, it would prove to be Herbert Hoover who emerged as the strongest candidate, having business experience, an international reputation for humanitarian work and strong moral bona fides, resulting in the cementing of the Charles Curtis/Herbert Hoover ticket at the end of the convention.

Next came the Progressive Party Convention, which was to be marked by considerable controversy. At the heart of the matter, as always, was the bombastic Huey Long who arrived at the convention widely regarded as one of the front runners for the nomination, bringing the single largest delegation to the convention with supporters drawn from across the country. However, Long's open ambitions and questionable morals provoked fear and worry in many of the older party figures, resulting in the gradual emergence of a concerted anti-Longist effort by former Democratic and Republican Progressives, who, in their search for a compromise candidate with the gravitas to challenge Long, eventually settled on one of their most famous members, the maverick William Borah. A man nationally recognized for going his own way and acting with great integrity, Borah had been a long-time stalwart progressive who had followed his convictions whenever challenged. A noted isolationist and constant campaigner for the progressive cause within America's borders, Borah did not quite match what any of the major anti-Long faction were looking for in their favored candidate, but he fit enough boxes for them to to agree to support his cause as a compromise candidate. The result was that when the choice of presidential candidate came up, Borah was able to outmuscle Long's supporters by a limited margin, to the outrage of Long and his inveterate supporters who cried foul, claiming that the party was deliberately targeting the best candidate they had available and hobbling the party. However, ever a quick thinker, Long was quick to quiet his supporters before turning his attentions back to the proceedings and demanding the Vice Presidential candidature as compensation, which was granted without much thought on the part of his opponents, who saw this as a low-value bone to throw the powerful senator.

Finally, the Democratic Convention came under way near the end of the month. With McAdoo's second term coming to an end the question of who would succeed him became a topic of considerable debate within the party, many of whom were not particularly pleased with the course the elections had taken. The favorite to claim the position as presidential candidate was the sitting Vice President, Pat Harrison, but there were many who questioned whether another candidate would not be a better solution. This led to men like Theodore Bilbo, Harry Byrd and James Nance Garner all coming under consideration, but ultimately Harrison would be able to win out - convincing many that his fellow Mississipian native Theodore Bilbo was too coarse and openly racist to win much support outside the south while allying with his fellow Southern aristocrat Harry Byrd to turn the votes in his favor. The result was that Pat Harrison was able to secure nomination as Presidential Candidate with the Virginian Harry F. Byrd as his Vice Presidential Candidate for the Democratic Party - to the utter fury of Theodore Bilbo, who hated the aristocratic Harrison like few others. The arrival of Edward L. Jackson and the Republican Klan affiliates to the Democratic fold was to be the final nail in the coffin as Jackson pledged his support for the Harrison ticket, in the process allowing Klan rivalries to influence the internal politics of the party with the defeat of the Klan-affiliated Bilbo (21).

Once the candidates got back onto the election trail, the battle for voters took on ever more intensity. While Republican and Progressive candidates sparred vigorously on a variety of issues, with Borah and Curtis focusing their efforts in the west, they were unable to muster the sheer level of vitriol which emerged when faced with the Democrats. A premier campaigner, Huey Long would - in defiance of all counsel, embark on extended election tours of the Deep South, attacking the Democratic ticket as out-of-touch aristocrats who had built their wealth on the backs of poor Whites and Blacks while stoking racial hatred to divide the lower classes against themselves. While far from all were convinced, Long was able to create an actual challenge to the Democratic hegemony over the region, sponsoring Progressive southern candidates and attending their campaign rallies to add an additional pressure to the Democratic campaign. His utter disregard for Jim Crow laws led to numerous clashes with local law enforcement, and more than one short-lived jailing, which in turn just served to further promote Long's cause to the wider American nation.

As the most enthralling of the political campaigners on the trail, Long was followed by a veritable swarm of journalists on his campaign, resulting in a near-constant barrage of news stories which ultimately eclipsed even that of his presidential candidate, William Borah. However, Long was far from the only man engaged in the electioneering campaign, as Pat Harrison worked wholeheartedly to combat the corrosive influence of Long's attacks while mustering up the support of the southern elite to combat Long's quasi-Socialist attacks while relying on his campaign mate for support further northward. It is notable that Harrison saw a precipitous loss of overt support from the National Klan over his alliance with Edward L. Jackson, and by extension the more northern-focused Indiana Klan. While the National Klan openly opposed Long's campaign, they did not provide anything close to the support enjoyed by McAdoo during his prior election campaigns. However, in all of this there was one figure who had largely been missing from public view for the majority of the election campaign, Hoover.

Herbert Hoover, rather than spend his time on interminable political rallies, instead worked to secure the support of other endorsers, particularly in California where he leveraged his university ties from Stanford, and in New England where he was able to rally the old money Republican elite. Hoover's efforts would largely meet with success in most circles. One intensely important point of contention between the Republicans and Progressives would prove to be the Irish American vote, which had traditionally aligned with the Democratic Party, but in response to the rise of Klan influences in that party had largely begun to depart the party. An important group of voters, particularly in the major cities of the North-East and Mid-West, the competition for their votes would prove an intense one.

However, ultimately it would prove to be the fact that in these regions the established Anglo-Saxon elites held dominant positions in the Republican establishment - the elites which the Irish American population had openly railed against for decades on end. In fact, the Democratic alignment of Irish-Americans at the time stemmed less from any sort of affiliation with the Democratic Party's ideals or platform, dominated as they were by Southern interests, but rather an effort to oppose the Republican Party which they viewed with hostility. Thus, when men like former Governor Al Smith of New York and Boston Mayor James Curley came calling for Irish-American votes on behalf of the Progressives, they received considerable support. In a welcome contrast to the last election, violence was much more limited and while marked by hostility, the campaign never quite descended to the levels of bloody vitriol which they had in 1928. However when election day came in early November and the votes were counted up, an entirely different sort of crisis emerged, for none of the three candidates had succeeded in securing the requisite 266 electoral votes necessary to win (22).

The American political system was fundamentally unsuited to the presence of three major political parties, with particular weaknesses surrounding the appointment of the presidency given the necessity of any President securing at least half of the electoral votes to achieve victory. However, in 1932 the bitterly divided electorate was to return a result not seen in Modern American history - one in which none of the three parties held the requisite number of votes to win outright. When this was confirmed, and as the electoral college election neared, the law books and constitution were swiftly consulted in order to determine how to resolve the crisis. What soon emerged was that the country was facing its first contingent election in a century, the last instance having helped resolve the vice presidential election of 1836 almost a century prior.

As the details of the proceeding became clear, including the fact that it would be the currently sitting lame-duck Congress which was to determine the future government rather than the just-elected Congress, a fact which drew considerable outrage on all sides, anger and vitriol began to pour from all sides. Intense political wrangling followed as the electoral college vote neared, with all parties negotiating in hopes of resolving the matter before it reached the House, which was itself bitterly divided between the parties. However, as the electoral college election neared it became increasingly clear that it would not be resolved there, many questioning the democratic legitimacy should the election be determined solely by faithless electors, questioning the entire electoral system and its democratic inequities. Finally the day of the electoral college election came in mid-December 1932 and saw the predicted result occur, namely that none of the major candidates secured sufficient votes to win. This resulted in the immediate calling of a full session of the House and of the Senate. As outlined in the constitution, the three presidential candidates and the two vice presidential candidates with the most votes backing them, Hoover and Long, were presented for the two houses of Congress to vote upon (23).

Behind the scenes, political manoeuvring dominated the day as the political factions within each party came into play, the Lowden and significantly stronger Curtis factions of the Republicans, the Longists, Democratic Progressive and Republican Progressive factions of the Progressives and the Conservative and Nativist factions of the Democrats to name but the broadest divisions. The first to act, as so often before, would be Huey Long, who extended an olive branch to his Republican Progressive party comrades, suggesting that an alliance with the Republicans to resolve matters would be in the best interests of all. The result was that two thirds of the Progressive camp placed pressure on their Democratic Progressive party fellows to attempt such an alliance, which would hopefully see the adoption of an internationalist, progressive government wherein the Progressives would be able to exert considerable influence over governmental affairs. With the party relatively united behind Long's plan, they reached out to the Republicans beginning a lengthy period of negotiations which only came to their end in the new year. Under the agreement which emerged, the Republicans would back the election of Huey Long for Vice President, with significantly increased mandate, in addition to a number of cabinet positions in return for the Progressives in the House voting in favor of Curtis.

Thus, finally, on the 8th of January 1932 Charles Curtis was elected as President of the United States while Huey Long was elected as his Vice President. Under the agreement between the two parties, Long was to be included in all cabinet meetings and was given the authority to preside over and call meetings in the absence of the President. As to the cabinet, Curtis would call on the highly trusted Henry L. Stimson to serve as his Secretary of State, on Herbert Hoover to serve as Secretary of the Treasury and Patrick Jay Hurley as Secretary of War, in the process securing the most prominent positions in the cabinet for fellow Republicans, while appointing Charles Evans Hughes as Attorney General and the Progressives Harold L. Ickes as Secretary of the Interior, Henry A. Wallace as Secretary of Agriculture, the former American Federation of Labor President William B. Green as Secretary of Labor. Beyond that Charles Francis Adams III was appointed as Secretary of the Navy and Robert P. Lamont as Secretary of Commerce while the Progressive Irish-American James Aloysius Farley was named as Postmaster General.

The new Congress would see the Republicans secure the most seats in the House, going from 129 seats to 160 while the Progressives increased from 121 to 142, mostly coming at the loss of the Democrats who went from 183 to 127 seats, the various minor parties, primarily leftist in nature, further increased their support to 11 seats in total. As to the senate, the Democrats saw a further collapse in numbers, falling to 30 seats, with the Republicans increasing to 38 while the Progressives finally crossed the 30-seat threshold to secure 32 seats. A new day was dawning for America, now ruled by a fragile governmental coalition under a sickly President and an ambitious Vice President (24).

Footnotes:
(18) With the suppression of the ACLU the cause of protecting civil liberties ends up at once both weakened and radicalised - it is important to note that the PLU is very far to the left, taking cases mostly for Progressive, Communist and Socialist causes. They are also a good deal more aggressive in outlook and less concerned about protecting the rights of their enemies than the ACLU was IOTL - there is a really strong grudge towards particularly the AILE for its predecessor's role in the suppression of the ACLU, since many of its former staffers and members were imprisoned for a while and a number of those people, radicalised by the experience, have since joined the PLU in relatively prominent roles. For the rest of this segment we see how various civil rights, anti-segregationist and assorted other organisations begin to make their voices felt. This is a period of intense social mobilisation, as social and cultural issues come ever closer to the boiling point.

(19) This ended up being basically an introduction for where the divergences begin to hit. All of these race riots and massacres are essentially OTL. What follows will be when things start to go off the rails in response to the various TL shifts up to this point. There are a frankly dismaying amount of dark horror stories to be discovered once you start digging through America's history of lynching.

(20) All of the named and described incidents are OTL, but the context of all these events has been shifted by the changing political circumstances, particularly the way in which an actively anti-Klan and anti-Racist party, in the form of the Progressives, is able to shape the political debate. Huey Long is placing himself in a position as the foremost figure of this movement, for good and ill, and given his willingness to get down and dirty we see the public airing of the details of lynching incidents at almost every one of his rallies, to the shock and horror of his listeners. In doing so, he is able to portray the Klan and their supporters (which basically cover everyone opposed to him) as murderous blackguards without morality, little better than soulless beasts baying for the blood of the weak and innocent. Long is a premier populist demagogue and he is willing to break a lot of taboos in his campaign, with astonishing impact.

(21) Just to make sure everyone is on the same page by the end of the conventions the candidatures are as follows: Republicans - Charles Curtis/Herbert Hoover, Progressives - William Borah/Huey Long, Democrats - Pat Harrison/Harry Byrd. There is a major shift to the left on the part of the Republicans with this ticket (although they are still miles short of where the Progressive Wing of the Republican Party once was) and a clear decision on their part to challenge the Progressive hold on the western states. The Progressive convention once again sees Long sidelined as VP candidate, to his and his followers great frustration. While the 1928 elections were not too troublesome in that regard, with Long's appointment viewed as a boon, this time around it stings a great deal more and is seen as a betrayal of Long and his followers by the wider party. However, Long doesn't want to bring down a party of which he is the single most popular politician, so he goes along with these developments despite his own considerable anger at the matter. Finally we see the Democrats settle on a Harrison/Byrd ticket which primarily aims to solidify the party's control of the South after the near-constant broadsides from Huey Long have done much to degrade the Democratic hold on the region. At the same time the arrival of Edward Jackson and his endorsement brings the prospect of further gains in the mid-west, although by allowing Jackson's entry the ground work is set for two competing Klan factions within the Democratic Party on top of their already present divisions. It is not easy being a racist when you have so many flavors of bigotry to choose from.

(22) When considering how bloody the 1928 election became, the 1932 elections seem like a breeze by comparison. Long demonstrates once more that he is a reckless, but immensely effective, political leader who is willing to do what others are not. His Southern Campaign, in which he basically sets about shaking the foundations of the Democratic hegemony is the talking point of the entire election, and serves to begin the development of an actual functioning opposition to the Democratic dominance which has held sway in the region since the end of Reconstruction. His demonstrated ability to rally poor whites, and even bring them together with their poor black neighbors, as he did in Louisiana is something that few others would even consider. The result is that he forces the Democrats to use up much of their efforts on securing their heartland, allowing the Republicans and Progressives to challenge for control of the rest of the country. However, the end result is that no one is able to reach the requisite 266 electoral votes, which throws the country directly into a constitutional crisis.

(23) Honestly trying to figure out what exactly the rules would have been under these circumstances was more trouble than I initially anticipated, but I will try to lay out what I have found so far. When the electoral college vote fails, the two houses are immediately called into session in order to select who should succeed as President and Vice President - notably the President is selected by the House and Vice President by the Senate, and their appointments are separate from each other. Additionally, prior to the passing of the 20th Amendment in 1933 it would have been the outgoing lame-duck Congress which determined matters while afterwards it would have been the in-coming Congress. In this case the result is that we have a bunch of people who have just been kicked out of office actually determining who the next leader of the country will be.

Untitled picture.png

(24) I really hope that this makes sense, ultimately we see the Republicans and Progressives form an uncertain governing coalition with a greatly mixed cabinet between the two coalition partners. It is worth noting that had the Democrats not lost so many seats in either house during the 1930 mid-terms, they would have been able to elect a Democratic President in 1932 - something which will be a topic of endless discussion and speculation in Democratic circles. This result is not really to anyone's taste, but the Republicans and Progressives are making the best of a bad situation.

Just to clarify the Cabinet:

President: Charles Curtis (Rep)
Vice President: Huey Long (Prog)
Secretary of State: Henry L. Stimson (Prog)
Secretary of the Treasury: Herbert Hoover (Rep)
Secretary of War: Patrick J. Hurley (Rep)
Secretary of the Navy: Charles Francis Adams III (Rep)
Attorney General: Charles Evans Hughes (Rep)
Postmaster General: James A. Farley (Prog)
Secretary of the Interior: Harold L. Ickes (Prog)
Secretary of Agriculture: Henry A. Wallace (Prog)
Secretary of Commerce: Robert P. Lamont (Rep)
Secretary of Labor: William B. Green (Prog)

Summary:
In Africa, Ethiopia falls into client-status to the Germans after a bitter civil war while absolute disaster strikes British Africa.
The Caribbean sees the emergence of powerful rulers consolidating their hold on power, while Black culture in the Americas experiences a renaissance.
Southern Latin America sees a gradual, often troubled, realignment in a more leftist with major shifts in government across the board.
The 1932 elections in the United States culminate in the election of a mixed Republican-Progressive government under Charles Curtis.

End Note:

I have been astonished by the sheer scale of impact the Great Depression had around the world and the way in which it fundamentally changed the political, cultural and economic circumstances of almost every single country I have come across during this period. From Burma, which we will be tackling in the next update proper, to Cuba, Argentina and South Africa, all saw their political status quo shattered. One of the fun things with the TL has been exploring what happens if some of those trends from the pre-Great Depression Era are allowed to play out longer.

I didn't get around to covering Central America or northern South America in this update, but I will be giving them their due - hell, that is the update I am working on right now.

The US section was written before the US elections played out, hell, if I remember correctly it was still late in the summer (August) when I wrote it, and boy has it been weird to have this sitting in the background while that was going on. It has been rather weird rereading it as I was editing in the leadup to posting, but I do think it ends up going a rather interesting direction. I always wanted to explore the dreaded constitutional crisis election scenario and while I could have had things spin completely out of control, this felt like a better path to take moving forward.

I really hope you all enjoyed this one, and I would love to see what people think of how things played out in the US in particular.
 
Last edited:
Ultimately, President Gonzàlez
I'm guessing this is supposed to be Martínez, given it's the lame duck presidency?
I have been astonished by the sheer scale of impact the Great Depression had around the world and the way in which it fundamentally changed the political, cultural and economic circumstances of almost every single country I have come across during this period.
I'm right there with you - it's been fascinating following along, and hopefully we can see a southern cone with enough stability and prosperity to weather whatever storm might be coming in the next few decades. Another really interesting impact here has been the collapse of ITTL Trotskyism - weakening antidemocratic currents in young socialist states, letting places like Chile and Brazil gain more democratic legitimacy.
this time around it stings a great deal more
Well he who laughs last laughs loudest, hm? Wonder if anyone will accuse Long of orchestrating his selection as VP candidate specifically so he could negotiate himself into a coalition? At the very least, he's managed to completely turn around a failure into a success - Borah is but a failed presidential candidate, Long is one elderly, potentially-infirm man away from president...
 
I'm guessing this is supposed to be Martínez, given it's the lame duck presidency?

I'm right there with you - it's been fascinating following along, and hopefully we can see a southern cone with enough stability and prosperity to weather whatever storm might be coming in the next few decades. Another really interesting impact here has been the collapse of ITTL Trotskyism - weakening antidemocratic currents in young socialist states, letting places like Chile and Brazil gain more democratic legitimacy.

Well he who laughs last laughs loudest, hm? Wonder if anyone will accuse Long of orchestrating his selection as VP candidate specifically so he could negotiate himself into a coalition? At the very least, he's managed to completely turn around a failure into a success - Borah is but a failed presidential candidate, Long is one elderly, potentially-infirm man away from president...
You are correct - should be fixed now :)

It was a bit surprising because I hadn't set out to have the Southern Cone countries set up in similar positions, but when I went back after writing that section to look for commonalities it really just jumped out at me how they all seemed on sort of the same trajectory despite coming from three different ideological directions. Both the impact of no Great Depression and the fall of Trotskyite Communism have had extremely large reverberations around the world - it has been fascinting to think of how the internal power struggle in the Soviet Republic might impact the development of leftist ideology across the rest of the world.

Oh, trust me - there are plenty of people who are going to be theorizing that the whole thing is a plot by Long to maneuver himself into power. Long has a lot of enemies within the Progressive Party who he will need to contend with even if he is probably the single most recognized and appreciated politician in America by this point. He is really the sort of figure who divides opinions - many love him, many hate him, few are ambiguous. I also thought that it would be interesting to start digging into what is actually possible when the American electoral system frays at the edges.
 
The more I learn about the early 20th century in America, the more I realize just how fluid it could have been - for example there are things that we now consider fixed and immutable, like the bill of rights, which were only around this time being formally instituted in the full way we understand today. In this case, it was that the bill of rights was generally followed in principle by state governments, with exceptions where they felt exceptions could apply, and it took a number of Supreme Court cases in the period to confirm that the amendments of the BoR applied to the states with the full force of law. Another example would be poll taxes, which were unanimously upheld by the Supreme Court in 1937 before being overturned in 1966.
 
Last edited:
Update Thirty-Five (Pt. 1): The Challenge of Dominion
The Challenge of Dominion

ImperialConference.jpg

The King and His Prime Ministers at The Imperial Conference of 1926

The Grip of Empire​

Canada emerged from the 1920s a significantly changed country from that which had entered the decade. Under the leadership of the deeply controversial Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, the autonomy of the Canadian Dominion had been championed like never before and the psychic distance between the governments of Great Britain and Canada rarely been more distant. The impetus for this shift, coming atop all the troubles at the tail end of the Great War, lay in the controversies surrounding the 1925 election in which King and the Liberals lost their controlling majority in Parliament. Ordinarily, the Conservative candidate Arthur Meighen, whose party had secured the most seats, would have been responsible for making the first effort at forming a new government. However, King decided to upstage Meighen by reaching out to the Progressives, who had themselves lost a good deal of their more radical following in Alberta during their years as part of the coalition government, in order to establish a new ruling coalition. This plan was complicated by the fact that his party won fewer seats than the Conservatives, and that King himself had lost his seat in the House of Commons. Meighen was outraged by King's move, and demanded that King resign from the Prime Minister's office, leading King to ask a Liberal Member of Parliament from Prince Albert in Saskatchewan to resign so that he could run in the resulting by-election, Prince Albert being one of the safest seats in Canada for the Liberals, which King won handily.

With King back in Parliament, another major scandal rocked the King cabinet when one of his appointees was discovered to be accepting bribes from a male lover. Anticipating a vote of censure by the Commons, King asked the Governor General, Baron Byng of Vimy, to call a general election to secure his mandate in the face of the crisis, but in a break with all norms The Governor General refused to do so, leading to King's resignation on the 28th of June 1926 and to a subsequent invitation to Meighen to form a government. King claimed this was an instance of blatant interference in Canadian politics by an official appointed by a foreign power, in the first major display of the anti-British sentiment which was to so characterise the government that followed. Showing rare fire, King rallied the Progressives back into his camp and defeated Meighen in a vote of no-confidence despite Meighen having sat as Prime Minister for just three days, thereby forcing the call for a new General Election. The 1926 elections were to see the effective absorption of the Progressive Party by the Liberals, which was made official by the end of the year, with the Liberals winning a clear majority of the seats in the House of Commons, allowing King to take complete control of the government moving forward.

With the King-Byng Affair now over, the Governor General was replaced by the Liberal Rufus Daniel Isaacs, Marquess of Reading, at the insistence of the outgoing Chamberlain government. Isaacs was soon to develop a decent working relationship with his fellow Liberal, King, but the damage done by the King-Byng Affair was to prove long-lasting. King's position re-entrenched, he set to work on extending Canadian autonomy any way possible, particularly after the rise of the British Labour government with its constant bureaucratic infighting and mismanagement of colonial and dominion affairs. King massively expanded the Department of External Affairs and in the process set about developing Canada's own diplomatic cadre. Having pledged their support to Canadian affairs before all others, this cadre soon began developing closer economic and political ties to France, in an effort to win over the Quebecois, while working with the Americans even as they sought to firm up the independence of the Dominions within the British Empire internationally. This was to lead to the Imperial Conference of 1926, which declared that Great Britain, Canada and other dominions were equal in status to each other and in no way subordinate to any other in either domestic or foreign affairs, and later to the Imperial Conference of 1930 where the legislative authority of the British parliament over Canada was effectively ended - although they would retain the power to amend Canada's constitution at the request of the Canadian Parliament.

King initially tried to match these efforts on a domestic level by transferring the ownership of Crown Lands and subsoil rights within Manitoba, Alberta and Saskatchewan to the provinces, but met with so much resistance from the Progressive wing of his party, who largely opposed weakening central government authority, that he was forced to abandon the idea. By contrast, he was able to pass a system of old-age pensions and improve labour laws considerably by the end of his second term - enough success to press for another term of office. The 1930 elections would see King face a major challenge from within his own party as Thomas Crerar of the Progressive faction of the Liberal Party mounted a challenge to the domineering King. The struggle that followed soon saw a key fissure within the party between more activist Progressives, who increasingly aligned behind the Social Credit political theories which had emerged amongst the Alberta Progressives near the end of the decade, and the more traditional King's Liberals. An intriguing emergent ideology which argued that civilization should be constructed around absolute economic security for the individual, the Social Credit movement was to secure a major following during the years that followed, as more and more of the Liberal party found itself disenchanted with King's near-complete control of the party. Ultimately, this challenge for leadership would be averted by King, but he was forced to grant considerable concessions to the Progressive wing of the party with the result that when he stood for election, he experienced a weakening of support from his own wing of the party - with some of the voters in the middle shifting their support towards the Conservatives.

Nevertheless, the 1930 elections would return King for his third consecutive term in office on the basis of his capable handling of the economy, successful resolution of the early 1920s crisis and the increasingly anti-British tone taken by his government. The first two years of King's new term would see a decided shift in governing policy, as the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Trans-Canada Airlines, the National Film Board of Canada - meant to help promote the Canadian film industry, were all established as crown corporations while the Bank of Canada was transformed from a private entity into a crown corporation as well. However, during this time the Prairie, which King has spent so much effort to aid in the development of, began to experience the same troubles striking the American states to its south - the Dust Bowl had arrived in Canada. The rise of the Charles Curtis Presidency to the south at the end of 1932 was to inaugur a new period of increasing Canadian-American cooperation, as the two governments worked to strengthen cross-border ties, cooperate on resolving the Dust Bowl and gradually developed an effective foreign partnership with the neighbour to the south (1).

More than any other Dominion of the British Empire, Australia embraced Conservative rule to the utmost. Under the leadership of the Coalition, so called for the fact that the Country Party and Nationalist Party worked entirely in concert to oppose the powerful Labour Party of Australia, Prime Minister Stanley Melbourne Bruce had brought Australia firmly into the post-Great War era. Summing up the requirements of his nation early in his term, Bruce stated that "men, money and markets" defined the essential needs of Australia, leading him to support a major migration campaign throughout the 1920s which ultimately brought some 400,000 Britons to Australia - although his efforts to settle these migrants and the returned soldiers in the rural countryside proved significantly less successful, with several major irrigation efforts in Western Australia and Queensland failing rather disastrously while many of the new arrivals settled into the tenements of Sydney, Melbourne and the like. Nevertheless, Bruce invested heavily in infrastructure developments, resulting in the continuation of various delayed and abandoned, but necessary, infrastructure projects such as the Sydney Harbour Bridge, the Sydney Underground Railway System, major highways, new dams and grain elevators as well as rural railway networks in nearly every state of the commonwealth. To coordinate the financing of these efforts, he set up a Loan Council in 1928 while seeking to improve the balance of trade with Britain with only limited success, particularly since two-thirds of Australian exports were based on just two commodities, wheat and wool.

Modernization of transportation also played a major role during the 1920s, as the number of cars and lorries in Australia grew more than ten-fold and coastal sailing ships were finally abandoned in favour of motor and steam-driven shipping, while the very first Air Ambulance in the world was founded by the Reverend John Flynn under the name of The Royal Flying Doctor Service. This was but one of many accomplishments for the Australian aeronautics scene, as the famed aviator Charles Kingsford Smith accomplished ever more daring feats, completing a Australia-round circuit in 1927 and traversing the Pacific the following year via Hawaii and Fiji, flying from the United States to Australia. As with Canada, the 1926 Imperial Conference saw the Australian Dominion placed on an equal footing with all other parts of the Empire, with control over domestic and foreign affair. However, the results of the 1930 Conference, which would have significantly weakened any real ties between Australia and Britain were left unratified as the Coalition government clung to the motherland despite its current trespasses, namely their election of what the Australian government considered a disastrous Labour government.

As Australia's economic boom continued, the continued borrowing of the federal and state governments grew increasingly troubling as warning bells began to ring in both Sydney and London. Already in 1928 had the debt of the state of New South Wales accounted for half of Australia's accumulated debt - a fact which caused alarm amongst certain political and economic circles, although most leaders remained reluctant to admit the problem. Australian debts rose at a level unrivalled anywhere in the British Empire, which eventually began to draw the notice of people outside of Australia as well. In 1925, the US-UK Trade Agreement, which would ultimately cause so much chaos in Africa, was passed and the produce markets of the British Empire were soon experiencing a precipitous decline in prices - most prominently in grain, a key staple of the Australian export economy. While wool prices held steady, the massive increase in grain supply caused a sharp dip in prices which directly impacted the Australian economy, weakening their balance of trade and pushing them even further into debt, which in turn worsened economic conditions across the dominion and placed renewed pressure on industrial relations as unemployment rose in response to employers seeking to cut costs where they could.

Labour relations, which had recovered from their early decade lows, collapsed once more as strikes broke out on a regular basis. In 1929 it was in the sugar mills, in 1930 the dockworkers and in early 1931 it hit the transportation and timber industries. However, the worst was to come later that year when labour disputes between miners and mine owners in the New South Wales coalfields culminated in riots and lockouts which forced the intervention of the Bruce government. Convinced that the source of the economic deteriorations were the worsening industrial relations, the Prime Minister issued a dramatic ultimatum to the Australian state governments to hopefully resolve the issue, either hand over their powers of industrial regulation to the federal government entirely, or the federal government would divest itself of its industrial powers and dismantle its federal arbitration capabilities, effectively repealing the much liked Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act of 1904. The opposition to the bill, called the Maritime Industries Bill, was fierce which, when combined with the fact that the government had just proposed a series of major new taxes to help alleviate the debt crisis, rapidly turned the public against the government. Nevertheless, Bruce forged on and by hook or by crook eventually forced the measure through the parliament, passing it on its Third Reading by a margin of two votes in favour. The matter was now turned over to the state governments who were left with a difficult choice to make (2).

Having succeeded in his initial endeavour, the Prime Minister now sat back and waited for the state governments to take control of the commonwealth's industrial policy duties - well satisfied with his accomplishment. The resulting debate in the individual state parliaments was to prove fierce and complex, with the Country Party representatives at odds with their National Party colleagues, many feeling that allowing control of industrial policies to be governed entirely at the state level would place too great of a burden upon a body unprepared and unsuited to the task. A key actor in all of this was the prominent Premier of New South Wales, the Labour politician Jack Lang, who rallied resistance to these efforts knowing full well that if the states took over control of industrial policy it would not take long before the numerous expensive industrial and infrastructural programs undertaken by the federal government would be pawned off upon the states, a prospect which could well mean bankruptcy for the already debt-ridden states, foremost amongst them New South Wales. While none of the states particularly enjoyed the idea of surrendering their voice in industrial politics to the central government, it was better than the alternative.

As a result, by the end of March 1932 the states had all surrendered control of industrial policy to the government. Horrified at this sudden and unanticipated added burden upon the government, and with his unpopularity growing by the day, Prime Minister Bruce was forced to make the best of a bad situation while seeking to gin up support going into the contentious 1932 elections. The result was a total route of the National Party and a considerable weakening of their coalition partners in the Country Party, while the Labour Party surged to victory. Here it is important to highlight the bitter factional struggles within the Labour Party which had occupied the preceding decade, as clashes between moderate and radical members played out to the constant drumbeat of electoral defeats. The radicals of the early 1920s gave way to a series of moderates from 1923, doing much to cool the flames of industrial strife, before the worsening economic situation and consistent electoral failures of the moderates allowed for the return of the party's radical wing to power. Leading this left-ward shift was none other than the NSW Premier Jack Lang, who was able to use his successful negotiation of the fall-out from the Maritime Industries Bill to secure leadership of the party in the leadup to the 1932 elections, and as such ascended as Prime Minister of Australia in 1932.

A steadfast campaigner for the rights of the poor and working classes, Lang had carried out numerous social programmes during his first and second terms as Premier - from 1925 to 1927 and then from 1930 to 1932, including state pensions for widowed mothers with dependent children under fourteen, a universal and mandatory system of workers' compensation for death, illness and injury incurred on the job, funded by premiums levied on employers, the abolition of student fees in state-run high schools and improvements to various welfare schemes such as child endowments, which Lang's government had introduced during an earlier term in office. Various laws were introduced in his second term, providing for improvements in the accommodation of rural workers alongside changes in the industrial arbitration system and the adoption of a 44-hour workweek. Extensions were made to the applicability of the Fair Rents Act whilst compulsory marketing along the lines of what existed in Queensland were introduced. Additionally, the adult franchise for local government elections was put into action, together with legislation to safeguard native flora and to penalize ships for discharging oil.

Coming into office in the midst of a crisis, Lang bucked expectations by refusing to cut government salaries and spending while passing a number of laws which he hoped would help ease the hardships of the emergent crisis, restricting landlords on their eviction rights and insisting on payment of the legal minimum wage on all government work programmes amongst sundry other efforts. Notably, Lang took contact to the highly regarded British economist John Maynard Keynes to aid in the development of a plan to help Australia out of its crisis, after Sir Otto Niemeyer of the Bank of England suggested that the Lang government should pursue a deflationary economic policy, cutting government expenditures by up to 25%, in order to honour their debt repayments. The conflict which followed within the government was a bitter one filled with intense recriminations and attacks as Lang rejected Niemeyer's proposal in its entirety.

Instead Lang pushed forward with a plan based partially on correspondence with Keynes, whereby the Australian government and the states of its commonwealth were to cease interest payments on debts to Britain temporarily, reduce interests on all government borrowing by 3% to free up money for Keynesian stimulus, the cancellation of interest payments to all overseas bondholders and financiers on government borrowings - to further inject money into the nation's money supply, and if issues with securing enough gold to maintain the Gold Standard emerged, to replace it with a Goods Standard whereby the currency in circulation was to be fixed to the amount of goods produced by the Australian economy as a whole. This plan, while drawing shrieks of horror and outrage from fiscal conservatives and foreign lenders, met with broad support from within the Australian banking system, which indicated that should he pay interest domestically they would advance additional financial aid to the government with which to stimulate the economy. As 1933 came to a close and Lang's plans came under way, the stage was set for a major crisis to unfold in Great Britain (3).

A stalwart supporter of the British Empire under its traditional Conservative and Liberal governments, New Zealand was to greet the tumultuous post-Great War world with ever greater insular efforts. In 1922 the powerful Temperance Movement was able to secure the passage of alcohol Prohibition, having come incredibly close to accomplishing the effort already in 1911, 1914, 1917, 1919 and 1921 - in a single moment, alcohol had been outlawed across the small dominion, to the great relief of some and the drunken anger of many. This measure was passed in the immediate aftermath of the 1922 elections in response to fears of mounting support for the explicitly socialist Labour Party, who were campaigning on the redistribution of wealth, nationalisation of industry and elimination of conscription, which had secured 25% of the vote in the recent elections.

Fearing that Labour would soon supersede the Liberals, the powerful and influential founders of the governing Reform Party worked with great dedication to counter the rise of the left. The ruling Reform Party was able to shore up its support, allying with the Liberal Party when needed to keep Labour out of power and influence, while working in close concert with the Conservative British Governments of the early and mid-1920s, in the process allowing for New Zealand to emerge as the single most firmly pro-British dominion in the Empire. However, the ascension of Labour to government in Britain was to see a drastic shift in attitude by the Reform Party, who turned firmly towards a policy of autarchic national security and isolationism in response to what they viewed as a betrayal of common British values by the British electorate. In 1927, faced with continued electoral failures after hitting a high-water mark in 1922, the Labour Party abandoned its socialist platform and adopted a firmly Social Democratic platform, developing and campaigning on a programme calling for a comprehensive welfare system, the prospect of which would see a significant shift in support towards the Labour Party in the following elections. As Labour experienced explosive growth in the years that followed, the Liberal and Reform Parties found themselves forced ever more into alignment with one another, culminating in their forming of a governmental coalition as the Liberal-Reform Coalition by 1931 in order to prevent a Labour government.

Similarly to Australia, the 1925 US-UK Trade Agreement began to eat into the small dominion's export trade by the turn of the decade, although significantly less so than in Australia, with the result that the economic growth of the 1920s slowed considerably, and fears of economic hardships began to make themselves known. Nevertheless, the government elected in 1931 was able to right the ship, steadying the political and economic situation through a minor stimulus package and the negotiation of more favorable trade terms with the British government in order to prevent the situation from deteriorating. One notable development during this period was the large scale investment by New Zealand into the united Dominion Fleet in Singapore, which had been established early in the 1920s to aid in the protection of the region from foreign threats, viewing this as the only way of ensuring New Zealand's safety in an increasingly tense world. The feeling of isolation which were to increasingly characterize New Zealand in these years were further worsened with the rise of the Lang government in Australia. Once a trusted, if overbearing, neighbor, the fact that the Australians had followed the British in their betrayal of proper British values by turning to Socialism worsened an already present distrust of New Zealand's fellow dominion and led the New Zealanders down an ever more autarkic path (4).

British Malaya was a composite frame of reference, used to describe three distinct colonial entities, the Federated Malay States, the Unfederated Malay States and the Straits Settlements. While the former two were British protectorates with their own local rulers, the Straits Settlements were firmly under British sovereignty and were ruled directly by the British Crown. In order to streamline the administration of the various independent Malay states the British had begun to federate some of the most significant of the Malay states under their control beginning in the 1870s, before uniting four of the most significant states, namely Selangor, Perak, Negeri Sembilan and Pahang, into the Federated Malay States with the minor town of Kuala Lumpur named as the federation's capital. Residents-General administered the federation, but allowed the various Sultans to retain limited powers over Islamic and Malay customs, while modern legislation was introduced and modernisation was undertaken as resource extraction and economic development were emphasised.

This left a variety of quasi-independent Malay states whose limited economic potential kept the British from incorporating them into the centrally administered Federated States, although by 1914 every Malay state had lost most of their sovereignty. This period of slow consolidation of power into a centralised government was marked by compromises which would have a great impact on the later road to nationhood, with the Sultans retaining their reign but not rule in their states - marking the transition of the idea of the Malay states as a collective of lands governed by independent feudal rulers towards a more federal constitutional monarchy. However, by 1909 the High Commissioner of the time, Sir John Anderson, began to express concerns that British Malay was becoming too over-centralised, with fears that marginalizing local rulers would erode the trust of the local populace. It was in response to these worries that the Federal Council, on which the sultans served as representatives alongside the colonial government and members of the non-Malay communities, was established, although it would have little real success in distributing power back to the individual states of the federation. A second attempt at decentralization came under way in 1925 under Sir Laurence Guillemard, with the British seeking to entice the unfederated states into a formal union, hoping to make joining more attractive by weakening the authority of the federal authorities. However, the proposal largely floundered in the face of opposition from Chinese merchants and British planters who felt that such efforts would significantly impact the economic efficiency of the region and slow the establishment of a unified modern state.

The arrival of Sir Cecil Clementi, a much lauded former Governor of Hong Kong who had helped steer that colony through the latter half of the 1920s with surprising skill, in 1930 to serve as High Commissioner of Malaya and Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the Straits Settlements was to augur a period of significant change. A firm believer in the need to unite the Malayan Peninsula into a single federal union due to the harm and inefficiencies provoked by its many diverse political branches, overlapping structures and overly complicated administrative structures, Clementi set out to immediately accomplish the task of finally unifying the region under a single authority. Clementi imagined a state which included all of the Malay States with the Crown Colonies, shifting the capital from Kuala Lumpur to the rapidly growing Singapore, and abolishing the post of Federal Chief Secretary of Malaya in favour of having the High Commissioner directly govern the proposed union. The move to Singapore was based on not only the massive ongoing investments in the city in an effort to build it up to a port sufficient to housing the Dominion Fleet, but also by the fact that Clementi felt the city much more secure against domestic threats. While Clementi was able to muster support from the Colonial Secretariat, the Chinese leaders of the Straits Settlements, particularly in Singapore, the colonial bureaucracy and even elements of the local Malay population, disagreements over the actual implementation and specific power-sharing structures of the new regime hindered agreement. This was further exacerbated when Clementi announced the details of his plan to the Federal Council in 1931.

Fearing that this might be a conspiracy to deprive them of power, with fears of becoming little better than puppets, as were the sultans of the Federated States, the unfederated states' Sultans, foremost amongst them those of Kedah and Johor, announced their public opposition to the plan. Further troubles soon emerged, such as reservations over how the currently federated states would maintain their power and authority when the economic centre of gravity shifted from the countryside to the coasts and the major port cities of Singapore, Penang and Mallaca, while colonial administrators began to question whether the plan would simply destroy the existing governance system of the Federated States while devolving the power of the colonial bureaucracy to local Malayans. Had matters continued on without external stimuli, these developments might well have ended there, but the demonstrated weaknesses of a disunited colonial authority, as was so viscerally demonstrated by the bloody Cochinchina Rising of 1931 which occurred bare months after the first proposition of Clementi's plan served to strengthen support for unity.

Fearing the spread of colonial rioting and revolt south from Indochina, the colonial authorities of Malaya pressed forward once more, Clementi tweaking his proposal to weaken the decentralising elements of the proposal while intense political pressure was placed upon the recalcitrant Sultans. This was most demonstrably the case for Sultan Ibrahim of Johor, who went so far as to solicit the support of the British Royal Family in hopes of avoiding the federalisation of his principality, only to be met with threats of deposition in favour of his son and regent Ismail of Johor by a thoroughly out-of-patience Colonial Office, already in the grips of a bitter power struggle with intrepid Labour appointees. Ibrahim remained steadfast in his opposition, culminating in his deposal and the appointment of his less recalcitrant son Ismail, to the shock and outrage of not only Ibrahim and the sundry Malay Sultans, who now felt forced to give way to the pressures of the colonial administration, but also to the British Royal Family itself, who lodged protests with the Prime Minister after Ibrahim lamented his fate in a series of inflammatory letters to King George. The entire affair was to drag on through 1932 before the Two Rivers Crisis brought an inconclusive end to Johor Matter, the government now far too busy to deal with the matter and King George driven to his sickbed over the current state of British affairs. By the end of 1933, Clementi was finally able to put into action his plans, resulting in the federalization and unification of all Malay States, while administrative duties were shifted to the rapidly expanding City of Singapore, now capital of the Malay Union (5).

Footnotes:
(1) Events follow relatively closely to OTL early on, including the OTL Byng-King Affair, and its associated weakening of the British-Canadian relationship. However, progressive sentiments are stronger in Canada ITTL and more organised (the result of events detailed in update twenty-one) and as such King is forced to shift to the left significantly earlier than IOTL. IOTL the Great Depression played a central role in driving King from office in 1930, but ITTL there is no such loss of faith in the governing party, although he faces growing pressure within the party, and as such he is able to win this time around. We then see King move into a lot of the stuff he eventually did IOTL later in the 1930s under pressure from the Left. Finally, we see the Canadians increasingly establish themselves as an independent power while the ties to Great Britain, already soured by the fallout of the Great War, weaken precipitously while turning increasingly to the South for a more trusted ally. One thing to note is that Canada is far less impacted by the 1925 trade deal, having already possessed quite significant cross-border trade with the United States.

(2) There are a couple minor divergence early on here before the major one at the very end. Migration from Britain is considerably larger ITTL given the ongoing troubles Britain has experienced during the 1920s, leading to 100,000 more Britons departing for Australian shores. Second, while the debt crisis emerges as IOTL (I don't see how to avoid it), the situation is less dire than IOTL where the Great Depression really just shattered the Australian economy and occurs about two years later, the impact of the 1925 trade agreement taking some time to make itself felt in the markets of the British Empire when contrasted to the sudden economic shocks of OTL's Great Depression. Therefore, all of these events are occurring under troubled, but not disastrous, circumstances. However, it is with the Maritime Industries Bill that we find our major divergence, because IOTL Bruce failed to muster the support he needed by the third reading, losing out by a single vote, which led to a vote of no-confidence and the collapse of his government. ITTL, while equally contentious, the matter is passed by a slim margin, presenting a major pickle for the Australian states to work out. I should mention here that Bruce hoped that the states would take all control of industrial matters upon themselves, allowing the commonwealth government to end its involvement in industrial politics.

(3) I have had some trouble working out exactly how the politics would have played out if the actual question set out in the Maritime Industries Bill were actually posed, so I hope you will allow me to push forward with this divergence, which ends up federalising the entirety of Australian industrial policy and arbitration, just as a formidable Labour government ascends to power. The fall of the Coalition government is based largely on how events played out IOTL - the passing of the Maritime Industries Bill and the major tax reforms set out by Earle Page are really the last straw for an increasingly unpopular government. I have also taken the liberty of having Jack Lang come to power in 1932 rather than the OTL Scullin government of 1929 because I feel the divergences would be sufficient to allow for Lang to rise to greater power, particularly on the back of a political master stroke with the Maritime Industries Bill. The policies I have outlined Jack Lang adopting are based entirely on what he OTL proposed in 1932, but which were disregarded by the Scullin government in favor of Niemeyer's proposals ultimately lead to the collapse of the Scullin government and the fragmenting of the Labour Party. Lang is a radical, who is willing to do whatever it takes to accomplish his goals, and who is willing to adopt policies and approaches which would be unthinkable previously.

(4) The butterflies for New Zealand are a bit limited in their nature, but there are some. In contrast to OTL, Prohibition is implemented in the small dominion - the matter was so close and attempted so often IOTL that I don't think it is a stretch to think that with a slightly more conservative outlook it could have passed without much trouble. The Liberal Party does not quite collapse entirely as IOTL, and as such the United Party is not formed in 1928 - meaning that it is still the bitterly divided Liberal Party which enters into coalition with Reform. As elsewhere, the Great Depression does not crash the economy on schedule, and while the 1925 Trade Agreement does have an impact, it is pretty limited in nature - more a slow down than a recession if that makes sense. Finally, we get back to the Dominion Navy, which has become the pride and glory of New Zealand in particular - they provide a lot of the sailors and invest heavily in it, viewing the navy as necessary to protect their dominion from hostile intentions. This is based on the fact that national defense was a constant and important factor in political debate in New Zealand at the time, so given the changed circumstances I think this shift makes sense.

(5) Once again, this starts largely OTL before shifting off the rails in the late 1920s. IOTL Clementi's proposal ended up floundering in response to the various factors I have laid out, with the added pressures of the Great Depression complicating matters and drawing much of Clementi's attentions for the duration of his tour of duty. ITTL, by contrast, the eruption of the Indochinese Revolt - and the way in which the rebels use the complicated bureaucratic structures in Indochina to their benefit, end up serving as a major impetus for unifying the colonial administration in Malaya, even at the cost of alienating local support. I know that angering the locals seems a bit wrong-headed if you are trying to prevent the colony from falling into revolt, but what the British are making note of is the involvement of the Communists in the Annam and particularly Cochinchina Revolts, as well as the way in which the shifting bureaucracies in Indochina has meant that colonial power and authority were so diffuse that they were unable to respond to multiple crises at once. By unifying the Malay, the British believe that they can significantly improve the efficiency of the colonial bureaucracy, centralising efforts in a place where they can be sure of retaining control (Singapore) and that ultimately the positive results thereof will turn the populace (which is split over the issue to a greater degree than the sultans themselves - who are largely opposed, but give way under the threat of deposal) in favor of the reforms.

577px-Mahatma-Gandhi%2C_studio%2C_1931.jpg

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

Land of Caste and Curry​

The years between the Nehru-Jinnah Report and the Two Rivers Crisis, 1928-33, were to be dominated by considerable debate and disagreement within the Indian independence movement. At the heart of the matter lay the divisions between the moderate and radical wings of the movement, who disagreed fundamentally over whether Purna Swaraj, the ideal promulgated by the late, great Chittaranjan Das, meant that Dominion Status was the end goal of the movement or whether an independent state, often presented as a Republic, was the ultimate objective of their movement. Age played a key role in this divide, with younger leaders like Subhas Chandra Bose and Jawaharlal Nehru amongst the most steadfast supporters of total independence, believing that dominion status would mean the retention of the Monarchy of the United Kingdom and preserve the political powers of the British Parliament to intervene in Indian affairs indefinitely. By contrast, Motilal Nehru held firm on the issue, using his considerable sway within the Swaraj Party to maintain support of the Dominion position, fearing that too significant radicalism on the part of the Swaraj Party would alienate their much more moderate companions in the Muslim Independence Party, which could in turn shatter the unity they had fought so hard to rebuild after the nadir years following Chauri Chaura.

At the same time, the MIP remained equally divided between those who wished to continue working in concert with their Hindu counterparts and those who wished to forge a separate path forward for the Muslim population of India. Foremost amongst those seeking to chart a separate course for Muslim India was Shaukat Ali, one half of the prominent Ali brothers, who had firmly opposed not only the Nehru-Jinnah Report, believing that Muslims should have been granted separate electorates in the report, but also rallying support behind the Two Nations Theory. Shaukat was able to secure a significant following amongst the members of the MIP but was unable to convince the charismatic Muhammad Ali Jinnah or his own brother Mohammad Ali to support the effort. Instead, Shaukat turned to the Muslim League for further support, proposing to Aga Khan III and other prominent League leaders that Muslim India should be established as a British Dominion ruled separately from the Hindu populace, although the details of where or how such a separate dominion should be constructed remained an issue of considerable debate amongst Shaukat's supporters.

Two deaths in 1931 were to provoke the first major shift in this uneasy equilibrium, as Mohammed Ali, Shaukat's brother, and Motilal Nehru both died shortly after one another, in the process removing the two most significant forces of moderation on both sides of the All-India United Front. These two deaths were to result in a pair major development, namely the gradual fragmenting of the Muslim Independence Party and the weakening of the Dominion-faction of the Swaraj Party. While Mohammad Ali had remained alive, Shaukat Ali had resisted the calls of his more radical supporters to break with the Hindu-lovers in the party in order to forge an independent path forward, but after his brother's death Shaukat increasingly fell under the sway of this radical group of supporters. Already in talks with Aga Khan and others of the Muslim League, Shaukat would bring matters to a head in early 1932, issuing an ultimatum that the Muslim Independence Party either end its support for the United Front, or he and his supporters would leave the party for the Muslim League.

The debate within the party was fierce, and on more than one occasion it seemed as though Muhammad Ali Jinnah would give way under the pressure, but with the backing of Dr. Mukthar Ansari, not only a prominent party member but also the Chancellor of the highly regarded Jamia Millia Islamia University, Jinnah was able to hold strong. The result was the departure of a significant minority of the Muslim Independence Party membership for the Muslim League, which was itself undergoing considerable divisions and disagreements as younger radicals sought to turn a party of the social elite into a mass movement. The arrival of Shaukat Ali and his supporters was to bring this mass appeal to the Muslim League while bolstering the younger radicals, but also significantly weakened the ties between the League and its governing allies as it shifted towards explicit support for a separate Muslim India. Shaukat had brought most of those still holding hopes of Dominion-status with him when he departed the party, leaving the Muslim Independence Party in the hands of far more outspoken and radical members who soon found welcome fellows in the Swaraj Party, where Motilal's death had allowed the more radical younger leaders around Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose to rise to power and authority (6).

A second development in this intermediate period was the end of Mohandas Gandhi's prison sentence in early 1928 and his return to the political stage, bringing him back into the complex ongoing political debate which was consuming the independence movement's various branches. Rallying the faltering All-India Congress Party behind him, Gandhi soon demonstrated his keen ability to generate publicity and support, being an inveterate political mind with a seemingly sage-like mien, by adorning the home-spun dress of India's rural poor and wandering amongst the poor masses of both urban and rural India, eating simple vegetarian meals and engaging with the daily travails of the Raj's poorest individuals in the spotlight of India's nascent mass media. Having recovered from his ordeals in prison and determined to once more return the Congress Party to the heart of Indian politics, Gandhi set out a course for the party to make itself heard once more by seeking to reignite the popular push for independence, deciding to protest against the salt tax.

A choice initially met with considerable consternation, particularly from his ever-loyal right-hand man Vallabhbhai Patel, who had proposed a land revenue boycott instead, Gandhi explained his choice by stating "Next to air and water, salt is perhaps the greatest necessity of life", indirectly referring to the fact that the onerous salt tax represented 8.2% of the British Raj's entire tax revenues, and was perhaps the single most damaging colonial effort for the poorest segments of Indian society. Seeking to reignite support for his efforts, Gandhi publicised his plan to march some 240 miles together with 79 trusted volunteers in protest of the salt taxes to the international media, the declaration quickly drawing attention from dozens of Indian, European and American newspapers as excitement over what the ever enigmatic Indian would seek to do for his first major action after imprisonment gripped the media.

Fearful of provoking a repeat of the out-of-control non-cooperation movement, Gandhi emphasised strict discipline by recruiting residents of his own ashram and training them to the strictest standards possible in his non-violent methods, while dispatching scouts to each village along the planned route of the march in order to ensure everything would proceed according to plan. However, by this point in time word of Gandhi's plans had reached the ears of the Viceroy and Governor General of India Freeman Freeman-Thomas, Earl of Willingdon, who expressed severe reservations over Gandhi's plans. As Governor of Madras during the height of the Non-Cooperation Movement, Willingdon had more than enough experience with Indian affairs to know that if the effort were allowed to proceed, it could well spin out of control with unaccustomed speed, and as such issued orders to prevent the march from occurring.

What followed was a tense back and forth between the Governor-General and Gandhi, in which they sought to determine a compromise, with Gandhi setting out a list of eleven demands, including reduction of land revenue assessments, cutting of military spending, imposition of a tariff on foreign clothes and the abolition of the salt tax. However most of these demands were of such grand magnitude that Willingdon was unable to give way, instead drawing their negotiations on interminably. Increasingly clear on what Willingdon was intending to do, and with both his own supporters and the international media growing increasingly impatient with the delays of the planned march, Gandhi finally broke away from the negotiations and set out with his planned marchers on the 13th of March 1930.

The first day's march of 21 kilometers ended at the village of Aslali where Gandhi spoke to a crowd of some 4,000, drawing considerable alarm from Willingdon's already angered office. Thus, while the second day proceeded as the first, with Gandhi's following expanding to nearly a thousand from the original 80 and the gathering at the end of the day numbering 8,000, Gandhi and his marchers would find themselves stopped by the colonial authorities mid-day on the third day, in mid-March 1930. After a series of tense negotiations, during which the assembled crowd grew ever more rowdy, Gandhi eventually decided to surrendered himself into British custody, fearful of the situation spinning out of control as at Chauri Chaura. Once more brought before the colonial courts, Gandhi was sentenced to a two-year sentence, which he was allowed to undertake under house arrest, on charges of disrupting the public peace and the assembly of an illegal demonstration. Nevertheless, Gandhi's actions, and his subsequent arrest, were to reignite the passions of the independence movement, leading the Swaraj Party's leadership to reach out to their former comrades in the Congress Party - inviting them to join the All-India United Front in early 1931, an offer which was accepted the following year (7).

The result of these events was the gradual coalescence of the wider Indian independence movement into the All-India United Front, and a resultant improvement in the movement's efficiency and reach. With the Congress Party, Swaraj Party and Muslim Independence Party all working in concert, the bitter divisions of the past decade finally seemed to be left behind. Not since the height of the Non-Cooperation Movement had the independence movement been so unified in purpose, nor supported by so many. The imprisonment of Gandhi in response to the abortive Salt March was, if nothing else, to prove of great worth to the propaganda efforts of the United Front, who not only sought to highlight the onerous nature of the Salt Tax and sundry other colonial burdens, but also to mobilise support for their efforts amongst the masses by holding up the beloved sage as an imprisoned martyr to the cause.

However, even as late as mid-1932 the independence movement found that it lacked the spark necessary to kickstart mass mobilisation, with particularly the MIP struggling to break through to their Muslim constituency, many of whom were far more enamoured with the prospect of a Muslim India without their Hindu neighbours raised by Shaukat Ali and the Muslim League than the secular and inclusive republic championed by the United Front. However, this all began to change with the South Mesopotamia Famine. In the span of half a year, the neglectful incompetence of the British colonial authorities had seen two Muslim colonial dependencies utterly ravaged by famine, banditry and murderous repression, all of which was covered with horrified exactitude by numerous Indian newspapers, and news that similar events were playing out in West Africa raised the spectre that one day India might be the victim of such horrors as well, more than one newspaper making comparisons to the Great Indian Famine of 1876-1878 to bring home the point.

By this point in time, word of the ongoing Indochinese Revolt had been making the rounds in India, with some radical anti-colonialists going so far as to travel through Burma in hopes of joining the fight against colonial oppression. At the same time, there were those who sought to emulate their Indochinese compatriots with a resultant gradual increase in violent resistance to the colonial authorities by organizations such as the Anushilans and Jugantars, most prominently demonstrated in the Chittagong Armory Raid. Conducted in 1930 by communist revolutionaries the Chittagong Armoury Raid saw a police armoury captured, telephone and telegraph wires cut and train movements disrupted while the prominent local European Club was captured and its White membership held hostage. However, word of the raid spread quickly and Indian Army forces were soon dispatched from Calcutta to end the uprising while the revolutionaries discovered that the armoury lacked much in the way of meaningful ammunitions, with the result that the revolutionaries decided to make their escape, having lost hope of putting up an actual resistance to the incoming soldiers, and feeling that they had accomplished their goal of enflaming the revolutionary spirit of India. However, before departing, a national flag was hoisted from the roof of the armoury and a Provisional Revolutionary Government of India was proclaimed before the revolutionaries escaped into the Chittagong hill ranges, wherefrom they would eventually make the trek to join the Viet Quoc and ICP resistance in Indochina.

As the fighting in Indochina proved the capacity for a revolutionary anti-colonial force to go toe-to-toe with their European occupiers, the idea of violent resistance, while far from the mind of the vast majority of the Indian population, nevertheless began to sow its seeds amongst the most radical fringe of the independence movement. The diplomatic crisis known as the Two Rivers Crisis was to firmly restore vigor to the independence movement, as Muslim sentiment shifted dramatically against the British colonial administration to a degree not seen since the heyday of the Khilafat Movement. Caliph Abdulmejid II's issuing of a fatwa against the British colonial regime set in motion the long-dormant spirit of resistance within Muslim India once more, seeing protests erupt across much of northern India, with the Muslim Independence Party swiftly endorsing the fatwa, seeking to use this fortuitous external impetus to achieve their long-held ambition of mass mobilisation.

During this time, Jinnah took contact with his compatriots within the All-India United Front, hoping to secure their support for general peace demonstrations - a proposal which found warm support from both the Swaraj and Congress Parties. This sudden resurgence of the independence movement, and particularly their success in mustering mass support for their demonstrations, was to greatly alarm the colonial administration and the British Parliament, setting in motion a debate on the status of the Indian Raj and how precisely the British government should respond to these uncertain times. It was during this debate that Muhammad Ali Jinnah's recommendation that any debate on constitutional reforms be held in concert with the populace of India first reared its head, securing the backing of the teetering Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald, although he would fail to gain sufficient backing to the idea for its implementation before political events in Britain itself swept the debate from the parliamentary docket. Nevertheless, MacDonald did succeed in securing the dispatch of a commission to study the constitutional reforms of the past decade in India - to be led by the youthful and talented Labour parliamentarian Clement Attlee, which was to set the stage for the Attlee Commission. While these events were occurring in Britain, the United Front was moving ever closer to forming a unified structure - with the successful reunification of the Congress and Swaraj Parties under the title of All-India United Swaraj Party in late 1933 (8).

The British conquest of Burma took nearly sixty years, and armed resistance to the British continued for a decade thereafter, culminating in the British finally adopting a policy of systematic destruction of villages and appointment of more stringent officials to troubled regions, finally bringing a measure of order by 1895. To govern their new lands, the British abolished the monarchy and forced the separation of religion and state. This act proved particularly harmful to the traditional governing structures as the local Buddhist communist, known collectively as the Sangha, were strongly dependent upon the sponsorship of the monarchy, whose policies the Sangha in turn legitimized and spread understanding of. To replace this sense of public support from the Sangha, the British instead turned towards the implementation of a secular education system which the Government of India, which was given control of the new colony, brought into effect both through the foundation of such public secular schools and by encouraging Christian missionaries to set up schools themselves. In the process Buddhism and traditional Burmese culture was put under considerable pressure. Whereas the colonial relationship to India proper had always been a complicated and multifaceted beast, the British approach to Burma proved far more ham-fisted, disregarding local customs and conventions in favour of an exploitative economic development far exceeding the tack taken in India.

Burma's annexation ushered in a new period of economic growth in which the economic nature of society changed dramatically. The British began exploiting the rich soil of the land around the Irrawaddy River Delta and cleared away the dense mangrove forests of the region, primarily turning them to the growing of rice, which was in high demand in Europe, as the main crop grown in and exported out of Burma. To increase the production of rice, many Burmese migrated from the northern heartland to the delta, shifting the population concentrations within the country and changing the basis of wealth and power within Burma. However, in order to prepare these new land for cultivation farmers were forced to borrow money primarily from Indian moneylenders, called chettiars, at high-interest rates as British banks would not grant mortgages to the native population. At the same time, thousands of Indian laborers migrated to Burma and, because of their willingness to work for less money, quickly began to displace Burmese farmers. Burmese villagers, unemployed and under increasing economic pressure, regularly turned to crime in order to resolve the resultant economic shortfalls experienced by their families. Thus, while the economy in Burma grew, most of the power and wealth conglomerated in the hands of several British firms and migrants from India. The civil service was largely staffed by Anglo-Burmese and Indians, while the ethnic Burmese were excluded almost entirely from military service, which was staffed primarily with Indians, Anglo-Burmese, Karens and other Burmese minority groups.

It should therefore come as little surprise that anti-colonial and independence movements within Burma enjoyed considerable local support. A new generation of Burmese leaders arose in the early twentieth century from amongst the educated classes, some of whom were permitted to go to London to study law. They returned with the belief that the Burmese situation could be improved through reform and were able to successfully argue their case to the colonial administration. Progressive constitutional reform in the early 1920s led to a legislature with limited powers, a university and more autonomy for Burma within the administration of India while efforts were also undertaken to increase the representation of Burmese in the civil service. However, these developments were matched by the growth of more forceful opposition to the colonial administration, with strikes and anti-tax protests proliferating by the end of the 1920s. Particularly prominent in these developments were the Sangha collective, with Buddhist monks prominent figures in the anti-colonial and independence movements.

This unrest finally culminated in December of 1930 when a localised tax protest in Thrrawaddy quickly grew into a regional, and later national, insurrection against the government. Led by Saya San, a physician and former monk who had risen to prominence as a member of the General Council of Burmese Associations - the leading independence movement in Burma, the revolt had its origins in the economic dislocation experienced by the local Burmese population of particularly Lower Burma in response to Indian migration and increasingly harsh colonial rule. When earthquakes occurred at Pegu and Pyu, Saya San, who had already built a considerable following within the independence movement, used this occurrence as a demonstrable portent related to significant prophesies which stated that the throne of the King of Burma would not remain unoccupied, in order to make a claim to rulership, having himself crowned as Galon Raja on Alauntang Hill in Tharrawaddy. Saya San promised his followers that he would restore the authority and sovereignty of the Burmese monarchy, revitalise the Buddhist religion and expel the British from the land, serving as a quasi-mystical magico-religious leader promising his oath-bound followers protection by his magical charms and tattoos.

Within weeks violence spread throughout the district of Tharrawaddy, leading British authorities, both in New Delhi and Rangoon, to dispatch armed forces to quell the rebellion. However, this effort would prove insufficient to quell the rebellion, which spread rapidly to neighbouring districts such as Pyapon, Henzada, Insein, Pegu, Toungoo, Prome and more, with sympathetic uprisings exploding across Burma. Police stations were attacked, railways dynamited, military outposts overrun, village headmen and other local collaborators were lynched and roaming gangs of rebels launched attacks on anyone unwilling to declare their allegiance to Galon Raja. Within weeks of the revolt the Rangoon authorities were seeking special emergency powers from New Delhi, leading to the appointment a Special Rebellion Commissioner by the name of Booth Gravely who began to oversee repressive efforts against the rebels in June of 1931.

With the appointment of Gravely, the revolt took a definite turn, beginning with the issuing of an amnesty offer to those rebels who had not participated in attacks on colonial authorities or murders of officials, while troops surged into Tharrawaddy resulting in numerous skirmishes between rebel and colonial forces. In August, Gravely instituted the Emergency Powers Ordinance, muzzling the Burmese press while the colonial authorities began actively targeting known and suspected rebels while establishing concentration camps for relatives and sympathizers of the rebels. In October, British forces fought a series of bloody clashes with the "Tiger and Lion Armies" in Paungde, the most violent and effective of the rebel gangs, before crushing the "Lion Army" late in the month. However, Saya San and the Tiger Army was able to retreat into the Northern Shan State, eventually crossing over the Sino-Burmese border in early 1932 where they joined with their far more numerous, better trained and heavily armed Viet Quoc compatriots. Unrest and sporadic rebel attacks would continue throughout 1932 and 1933, coupled with near constant cross-border raids by Saya San and his increasingly professional Tiger Army - numbering a couple thousand at any one time, resulting in a constant state of low-key warfare centred primarily on the Shan States but on occasion spreading south to the more populous Irrawaddy Delta (9).

Amanullah Khan's successful defeat of the Khost Rebellion in 1925 and the subsequent weeding out of the conservative faction was to set the tone for the decade which followed. Now secure in his position atop the Afghan throne, Amanullah redoubled his reform efforts while making an ever greater effort to make his mark internationally. He firmly established Afghanistan's independence during this period, establishing embassies in Berlin, Istanbul, Moscow, Paris and Washington while working to secure acceptance on the part of British for the new status quo. During this time, the Afghan government improved relations with Khiva by resolving the Urtatagai Crisis, established friendly relations with the Socialist government of Persia and sought to develop a following amongst the nomadic populace of northern Pessian Persia - efforts which would eventually allow for the expansion of Afghanistan in the Khorasan region during the collapse of that state.

This period was to see major reforms, particularly on the issue women's rights under the influence of Queen Soraya Tarzi, whose sophisticated liberalism played a key role in her husband's reign. Queen Soraya herself publicly removing her Hijab and pressed the wives of government officials to follow suit. In place of her hijab, Soraya wore wide-brimmed hats with a diaphanous veil, feeling it to be a much more modern and liberating solution to the religious question of veiling women. Queen Soraya encouraged women to seek education, opening girls' schools around the country and sponsoring talented young women for higher education in the Ottoman Empire. She further founded the country's first magazine for women and toured Europe with her husband on a campaign to spread awareness of the modernist Afghan monarchy with considerable success.

However, these efforts, word of which were spread through British-distributed pictures of the unveiled queen meeting and dining with foreign men, were to cause outrage and disgust amongst conservative tribal chiefs while the Afghan elite did all in their power to emulate the efforts of the royal court. The Khost Rebellion was to also see a shift in tribal policy on the part of Amanullah, who began a slow but steady tightening of restrictions on the powerful tribes which predominated in Afghanistan. First of all he worked to increase the divides between various conservative tribes both by pouring acrimony into various clan feuds and conflicts, while working to reward the tribes most open to his political platform. Over the course of the five years between 1925 and 1930 more than a dozen smaller and medium-sized tribes would find themselves scattered and resettled in different parts of the country as punishment for a variety of infractions, most often protests or violent resistance to government reforms, while the tribes which adopted Amanullah's liberal reforms the most were rewarded with lands and authority over their more intransigent neighbours, all while Amanullah continued to press forward with his reforms. Late in the decade the King established a national bank and pushed through new educational reforms in an effort to both improve literacy and inculcate the population with an understanding of the government's goals for modernisation, there was even debate over whether to implement a new Latinate alphabet, but this suggestion was ultimately rejected by the King.

It was around the turn of the decade that Amanullah was first exposed to the idea of a Muslim Indian Dominion through correspondence with the esteemed Muslim Indian thinker Muhammad Iqbal. Originally a firm supporter of the Muslim League in the Punjab, Iqbal had served as one of the first party secretaries following the League's expansion to the provincial level, and had divided his time between law practice, poetry and political activism in the years since. However, he had remained a stern critic of the Indian National Congress, which he regarded as dominated by Hindus, throughout the Non-Cooperation Movement and was bitterly disappointed by the League's decision following Chauri Chaura to turn towards a pro-British stance, seeing the factional bickering which soon consumed Muslim India between the factions of both the Muslim League and Muslim Independence Party as intensely demoralising. While some had urged Iqbal to stand for election in the Punjab, he instead began to travel the Muslim world in hopes of finding inspiration for a path forward for Muslim India. During this period - between 1924-29, Iqbal was to spend time in Pessian Persia, Hashemite Arabia, Egypt and particularly the Ottoman Empire before settling down in Kabul at the court of Amanullah Khan.

Here Iqbal found a man who he could imagine sitting at the head of Muslim India. Championing the idea of Muslim India under liberal Afghan rule, Muhammad Iqbal was able to develop a small but influential following within the Indian Independence movement, particularly the more radical of Shaukat Ali's supporters, many of whom would spend time in Kabul where Iqbal helped set up a University in 1931. The partisan infighting which was to consume the MIP in the period immediately following this was to provide further support for Iqbal's movement within Muslim India, although for the time being this movement remained more intellectual than practical, with the Two Rivers Crisis served to highlight the failures of the British colonial regime and the Fall of Pessian Persia to highlight the fact that Afghanistan was turning into an effective independent power in Central Asia (10).

Footnotes:
(6) The 1931 deaths of Motilal Nehru and Mohammad Ali end up becoming a defining turning point for the United Front, as it brings radicals to leadership of both the Swaraj and Muslim Independence Parties at nearly the same time. Concurrently with that we see the Muslim League adopt support for a separate Muslim Indian Dominion, in effect a Dominion of Pakistan (the name isn't quite there yet, as it was only coined in 1933 IOTL under particular circumstances). It is important to note that from this point forward the United Front parties will grow ever closer, their organizations increasingly overlapping, with a likely merging down the line. This is because the biggest stumbling block for such a union were the Pakistan-wing of the MIP, who found the very idea of working with Hindus distasteful. With them out of the way, the MIP becomes a good deal more open to cooperation with Hindus - although there is still a good deal of reticence on the part of figures like Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Also worth noting here that the Swaraj Party falls firmly into the hands of some of the most radical leaders in the party, Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose. Note that the increased disorder and lack of unity on the part of the independence movement means that there isn't the sort of unrest and disorder which IOTL led to the Round Table Conferences during this period. This fact, coupled with the ongoing bureaucratic troubles experienced by the Labour Government and that the TTL reforms of the early 1920s went further than IOTL, has meant that there has not been the same sort of push for constitutional reforms that was present IOTL.

(7) I am sorry, but Gandhi just is not going to get a break here. It is worth noting that Gandhi does not have anything like the status he enjoyed at the height of the Non-Cooperation Movement, or IOTL at the start of the Salt March, so while he is able to draw quite a bit of attention it just isn't anywhere near the level of OTL. Secondly, we have a different Governor-General sitting in India - someone who had experience with Gandhi and his movement in the past, and as such isn't as likely to underestimate him as happened IOTL. These two factors end up playing together to allow for the disruption of the Salt March before it can really make a major mark, and Gandhi finds himself imprisoned once again when it becomes clear that the massed crowds aren't as disciplined as his hand-picked marchers. It is worth remembering that Gandhi has not had an opportunity to really hone his non-violent approach in the years between Chauri Chaura and the Salt March as he did IOTL, which means that what people mostly remember of the Non-Cooperation Movement is not its attempted non-violent approach, but rather the fact that it did end in violence. One thing to note here is that as a result of both Chauri Chaura and Gandhi's inability to demonstrate the efficiency of Satyagraha, i.e. non-violent resistance, the idea never really gets lodged in the international consciousness the way it did IOTL. There are many who laud the ambitions of Satyagraha, and plenty who view it as the ideal form of resistance, but it is viewed as unrealistic by most people ITTL due to its demonstrated failure at Chauri Chaura. Without getting a second chance to demonstrate that his ideas work, Gandhi is unable to make non-violent resistance a staple of 20th century political action as he did IOTL. That is not to say that others won't take up Gandhi's ideas, nor that this is the last we see of non-violent resistance a la Satyagraha, but rather that it remains an undemonstrated ideal rather than the semi-conventional political tool it has turned into IOTL.

(8) The Two Rivers Crisis ends up proving the impetus for the gradual reunification of the divided independence movement, as the decision on the part of the Swaraj leadership to protest in solidarity with their Muslim compatriots greatly strengthens the brittle bonds between the two core forces of the United Front. The Two Rivers Crisis also allows for the reemergence of a truly mass independence movement after a decade of political infighting and intrigue. For the same reason we see the British begin to bring under way some of the various efforts that they undertook IOTL when India grew quiescent, although ITTL Jinnah's proposal for Round Table discussions flounders in the face of the confused and partisan political situation in Great Britain itself. Instead we see a latter-day Simon Commission dispatched under the leadership of Clement Attlee. Finally we see the divide between Congress and Swaraj Parties finally brought to a close with the merger of the two organizations. The original split was provoked by Gandhi's unwillingness to challenge the colonial authorities in the aftermath of Chauri Chaura, but with his Salt March he demonstrated that he had "regained his spine", and as such is welcomed back with open arms (probably also helps that he makes for a fantastic martyred figurehead, while Bose and Jinnah actually take charge of the movement). It is worth noting that this unification might spell trouble in the long run because the Swaraj Party has been leaning pretty far towards the left under the direction of Nehru in particular, while Vallabhbhai Patel, who ends up leading the Congress elements in the absence of Gandhi, is a hardcore right-leaning liberal ideologically. While matters of independence remain in question, they should be able to work together well, but at some point that difference in opinion is going to play a key role in events.

(9) This is, once again, primarily OTL developments until near the end. The economic situation is no where near as bad as IOTL in Burma at the end of the 1920s, but the economic displacement of the local Burmese is greater, meaning that the effects about even out to around the level of OTL with some minor differences in what areas go into revolt when during Saya San's Revolt. Additionally, with the ongoing Indochinese Revolt and South China Revolt, there is little to prevent Saya San from slipping over to safety in China when the situation begins to turn against him in mid-late 1932. The result is an ongoing colonial struggle in Burma which, while not a major issue most of the time still serves as a constant bloody irritant.

(10) Amanullah ends up turning towards a divide and conquer approach to the tribal population of Afghanistan which greatly weakens the ability of the Conservatives to challenge central authority. However, he does not let up on his reform program, going ever further down that path. Notably, IOTL Queen Soraya and Amanullah's trip to Europe and the British-distributed pictures therefrom ended up playing a key role in Amanullah's overthrow, however ITTL much of the conservative power has already been bled off either during the Khost Rebellion or in the minor unrest which Amanullah has been using to fracture hostile tribes since then. Finally, we have a bit of an experiment on my part with Iqbal. Given that IOTL Iqbal ended up searching for a man to lead Muslim political empowerment - and finding that leader in the form of Jinnah IOTL, I thought that given the changes to the political circumstances ITTL he might go searching elsewhere.

Given that Jinnah is very close to the Congress-Swaraj Parties, I don't think Iqbal would be as interested in supporting him as he was IOTL, and the pro-British stance of the Muslim League would also alienate him there. As a result he does not seek political office ITTL and instead goes on an expedition to various other Muslim countries in search of inspiration. My read on the situation with Amanullah makes it seem like him and Iqbal might have had a lot to talk about and sort of similar outlooks on the political situation, which leads Iqbal to view Amanullah as his choice to lead Muslim India into independence and the proposition of a third path forward for Muslim India. So to clarify, there is the Muslim League championing a Muslim Indian British Dominion, the Muslim Independence Party campaigning for a united India alongside the United Swaraj Party and there is Iqbal's small intellectual community campaigning for what is effectively Afghan-Pakistan.

End Note:
Honestly, most of the time the most horrific or bizarre stuff that makes it into this TL is almost entirely OTL. Saya San's semi-mystical Kingship is just the latest example. A former monk declaring himself King, promising to protect his followers with mystical charms and talismans, while waging war against an overwhelming foreign conqueror is like something straight out of a wuxia novel, just in a much more modern setting than what you might ordinarily see.

I hope that people enjoyed this deep dive into the affairs of the British Empire and its surroundings in South Asia. It has been quite fascinating to research all of these things, the Chittagong Armoury Raid is entirely OTL, Saya San is OTL (if under somewhat different circumstances and cut off far earlier), Amanullah's modernism is OTL (although ITTL he has crushed his opposition and as such isn't toppled at the end of the 20s) and so much more. This is a period with a surprisingly significant level of impact on the societal developments of the world outside of the regions ordinarily covered in Alt-History TLs, where a lot of the trends which were to characterise various countries throughout the coming decades were laid down.

One thing to note is that I am switching the update schedule up a bit for the next couple of weeks due to Christmas and New Years. As such, next Sunday will have just a single section about events in Indochina and Thailand. The second section will be posted on Christmas Eve's Day (24th, in Denmark we celebrate on Christmas Eve rather than Christmas Day, part of the whole Viking Yule origins of the celebrations in Denmark). The reason I am doing this is because that second section will set the stage for some major events covered in full on New Years (31st) which should excite and intrigue all of you. I really hope you enjoy these coming weeks and that everyone makes it through the holidays happy and hale.
 
Last edited:
Your TLs go into such extraordinary detail. I have no idea how you manage to keep track of all the developments.
I keep the prior related updates available as I write and research a ton for each development. Probably use anywhere from 3-5 times as much time researching as I do actually planning and writing out the updates. That said, I have always been quite good at taking a ton of information, compressing it down and then passing it on. It is one of the things I do a lot for work as well - this is just a more fun version of that.

And, I don't always manage to keep track of the various development - I have to go back and check up on things quite a bit to make sure things remain coherent and on track, and I know that there are several points where I made some mistakes in that regard. Probably the most troublesome aspect is digging through the many, many different figures and characters I have involved in the timeline - keeping track of what parts of their lives have remained the same and what parts changed as we move through time. This is particularly significant with Russia where the butterflies have swept through the region so many times by now that it is hard to keep track of.

That said, one of the things I find so enjoyable about alt-history is exactly the way in which you have this tapestry of history where a single changed thread gradually reveals an entirely different picture as you move forward. Step by step by step, things move further away from what we know and towards something new and interesting. Trying to make sure that each of those small steps make sense, seem plausible and hold an internal logic is part of the fun of writing the timeline.

That ended up being a bit of a tangent, but I hope you don't mind. :)
Amazing and detailed stuff as always! No other words haha
Thanks for the kind words!
 
Always love every update into your TL, Zulfurium.

when reading about Burma, I remembered my great-grandad who was a pretty successful businessman in Burma, immigrating their from Madras. It is always interesting to imagine where your relatives would be in ATL's, and this one especially.

Man, I knew all along that this TL was an Afghan-wank! No but seriously the Afghans are getting a pretty damn good deal in the TL lol
 
Top