allanpcameron
Donor
28 November 1941. Nottinghamshire, England.
Welbeck Abbey had become home to the 43rd Bn RTR, or “43rd (6th City) Battalion, The Royal Northumberland Fusiliers, Royal Tank Regiment” to give them their full title. As with a number of pre-war territorial units, it had been converted to an armoured role. Along with two other such battalions, 144th and 148th Royal Armoured Corps (formerly 9th Loyal Regiment North Lancashire and 8th East Lancashire Regiment) made up 33rd Army Tank Brigade.
43rd Bn RTR had been chosen for this particular role because it had been lucky enough to have some Matilda II and Dragon artillery tractors to train on after Dunkirk. Having done so, they would now pass on this experience to the two new RAC regiments. Those Matilda II tanks had been passed on to other units, and now 43rd Bn RTR were the first unit to be equipped with the new A22 Infantry Tank Mark IV. Known as the ‘Churchill’, this Vauxhall product had been through a lot of development before being issued to a tank battalion, but it was still a rush job.
Some of the officers and men of the Battalion had been detached to Vauxhall and to some of the other firms making the tanks, especially Broom & Wade, Beyer Peacock and Gloucester Railway. Others had gone to the factories to learn about the Bedford twin-six engine, and others to learn about the new gear box, steering gear and final drive.
Having worked alongside the civilian workers to learn about their new tanks, some of these same civilians were now at Welbeck Abbey working with the soldiers to master the complexity of a new type of tank. Brigadier Roy Jerram, OC 33rd Army Tank Brigade, had very particular orders. The numbers of A22s being delivered on a monthly basis would equip his Brigade by early next year. Each of the three battalions had been issued twenty tanks initially, for familiarisation. Once the men and machines were ready, then Jerram would have to work out the best use of this new Infantry Tank.
Differing from previous Infantry Tanks, the Churchill resembled the French Char B1 (bis) in that the turret contained the standard 2-pdr gun, and also had the 3-inch tank howitzer mounted in the hull. Normally only Close Support tanks were armed with the howitzer, but this was on all the tanks. The difficulty for the hull gunner to make best use of the howitzer had led to a request for a new prototype from Vauxhall for a Mark II, which would replace the howitzer in the hull with a Besa machine gun, and have the usual mix of gun and CS tanks using the 2-pdr or 3-inch howitzer.
The reviews of the battles in Libya had called for a greater use of HE shells, and there was a case to be made of replacing the 2-pdr in the turret with the 3-inch howitzer, and having these as the majority of tanks in the battalion, with one 2-pdr tank in each troop. Jerram’s findings would be play a big part in the decision about the best way forward. Already the concept of the Infantry Tank protecting the infantry from enemy tanks, therefore needing the penetration of the 2-pdr, had been refuted in combat experience. An Infantry Tank supporting the infantry had to be capable of overcoming prepared enemy defences, for which an HE shell was much more useful.
Once more the threat of invasion was remote, between the winter weather and the German commitment in Russia, meant that the army could focus over the next few months on training. As Brigadier Jerram sat with his senior officers working out a full training program for the next few months, it was difficult not to be sceptical about the new tanks. As a replacement for the Matilda Infantry Tank II it wasn’t much of an improvement, except in armour protection, now four inches thick at the front. The men weren’t too impressed with the problem of trying to fight a vehicle with two main guns, especially as the howitzer had such a limited traverse and elevation. Because the 3-inch howitzer had been designed to be fitted into the 2-pdr mounting, the armourers were fiddling about, trying the idea of the howitzer in the turret, allowing for more ammunition storage for the HE and smoke shells.
The mobility of the new tank was impressive over obstacles, the Merritt-Brown transmission allowed the drivers to take the tank places that most tanks would avoid. The power to weight ratio wasn’t great, and it was extremely noisy, reminding some of the oldest men of the early tanks of 1916. Brigadier Jerram had commanded a Mark IV tank at Cambrai, and had commanded a Squadron of Matilda I and IIs of 7th Bn RTR at Arras in 1940, later becoming its CO. Thinking back to that fight, going up against the Czech made tanks of 7th Panzer Division, he couldn’t help feel that the new Churchill tank had learned more from the lessons of the fighting in Flanders and France in 1917 or 1918 than from 1940. The Churchill would have been an unbeatable tank over the trenches and shell holes. For what lay ahead in 1942 and beyond, he just wasn’t convinced that this was the machine that would win a war.
Welbeck Abbey had become home to the 43rd Bn RTR, or “43rd (6th City) Battalion, The Royal Northumberland Fusiliers, Royal Tank Regiment” to give them their full title. As with a number of pre-war territorial units, it had been converted to an armoured role. Along with two other such battalions, 144th and 148th Royal Armoured Corps (formerly 9th Loyal Regiment North Lancashire and 8th East Lancashire Regiment) made up 33rd Army Tank Brigade.
43rd Bn RTR had been chosen for this particular role because it had been lucky enough to have some Matilda II and Dragon artillery tractors to train on after Dunkirk. Having done so, they would now pass on this experience to the two new RAC regiments. Those Matilda II tanks had been passed on to other units, and now 43rd Bn RTR were the first unit to be equipped with the new A22 Infantry Tank Mark IV. Known as the ‘Churchill’, this Vauxhall product had been through a lot of development before being issued to a tank battalion, but it was still a rush job.
Some of the officers and men of the Battalion had been detached to Vauxhall and to some of the other firms making the tanks, especially Broom & Wade, Beyer Peacock and Gloucester Railway. Others had gone to the factories to learn about the Bedford twin-six engine, and others to learn about the new gear box, steering gear and final drive.
Having worked alongside the civilian workers to learn about their new tanks, some of these same civilians were now at Welbeck Abbey working with the soldiers to master the complexity of a new type of tank. Brigadier Roy Jerram, OC 33rd Army Tank Brigade, had very particular orders. The numbers of A22s being delivered on a monthly basis would equip his Brigade by early next year. Each of the three battalions had been issued twenty tanks initially, for familiarisation. Once the men and machines were ready, then Jerram would have to work out the best use of this new Infantry Tank.
Differing from previous Infantry Tanks, the Churchill resembled the French Char B1 (bis) in that the turret contained the standard 2-pdr gun, and also had the 3-inch tank howitzer mounted in the hull. Normally only Close Support tanks were armed with the howitzer, but this was on all the tanks. The difficulty for the hull gunner to make best use of the howitzer had led to a request for a new prototype from Vauxhall for a Mark II, which would replace the howitzer in the hull with a Besa machine gun, and have the usual mix of gun and CS tanks using the 2-pdr or 3-inch howitzer.
The reviews of the battles in Libya had called for a greater use of HE shells, and there was a case to be made of replacing the 2-pdr in the turret with the 3-inch howitzer, and having these as the majority of tanks in the battalion, with one 2-pdr tank in each troop. Jerram’s findings would be play a big part in the decision about the best way forward. Already the concept of the Infantry Tank protecting the infantry from enemy tanks, therefore needing the penetration of the 2-pdr, had been refuted in combat experience. An Infantry Tank supporting the infantry had to be capable of overcoming prepared enemy defences, for which an HE shell was much more useful.
Once more the threat of invasion was remote, between the winter weather and the German commitment in Russia, meant that the army could focus over the next few months on training. As Brigadier Jerram sat with his senior officers working out a full training program for the next few months, it was difficult not to be sceptical about the new tanks. As a replacement for the Matilda Infantry Tank II it wasn’t much of an improvement, except in armour protection, now four inches thick at the front. The men weren’t too impressed with the problem of trying to fight a vehicle with two main guns, especially as the howitzer had such a limited traverse and elevation. Because the 3-inch howitzer had been designed to be fitted into the 2-pdr mounting, the armourers were fiddling about, trying the idea of the howitzer in the turret, allowing for more ammunition storage for the HE and smoke shells.
The mobility of the new tank was impressive over obstacles, the Merritt-Brown transmission allowed the drivers to take the tank places that most tanks would avoid. The power to weight ratio wasn’t great, and it was extremely noisy, reminding some of the oldest men of the early tanks of 1916. Brigadier Jerram had commanded a Mark IV tank at Cambrai, and had commanded a Squadron of Matilda I and IIs of 7th Bn RTR at Arras in 1940, later becoming its CO. Thinking back to that fight, going up against the Czech made tanks of 7th Panzer Division, he couldn’t help feel that the new Churchill tank had learned more from the lessons of the fighting in Flanders and France in 1917 or 1918 than from 1940. The Churchill would have been an unbeatable tank over the trenches and shell holes. For what lay ahead in 1942 and beyond, he just wasn’t convinced that this was the machine that would win a war.
Last edited: