Hail, Britannia

Navajo; 2017 gubernatorial election; The Long Walks

LeinadB93

Monthly Donor
So to kick off the re-start, here's a unique and wonderful part of the world. I'm still in the process of retconning a lot of stuff, but I hope you enjoy this :)

Presenting Navajo - Texas' Native State:

rd293tC.png

Navajo, officially the Navajo Nation and commonly known as the Navajo State, is a Texan state in the northwest of the country, bordered by the Kingdom of the Californias to the west and north across the Colorado River, the United Empire and the state of Llano to the east, and the state of New Mexico to the south. With a land area of 136,539 square kilometres and a population of 450,931, Navajo is the fifth-largest subdivision by area, but the least populous. It is the only state or district of Texas where people of indigenous descent make up a majority of the population, and the only one to not recognise English as an official language, although it is widely spoken as a second language.

Inhabited by Indigenous American peoples for millennia, the area that makes up modern-day Navajo was settled by the Ancestral Puebloans, and later the Ancestral Diné[1], for centuries before the arrival of European explorers. Known in the Ancestral Diné language as Dinétah, the region was marked by the high mesas and deep canyons that drain to the San Juan River (known to the Navajo as "Są́ bito'"). Pressures from the Spanish and other Amerindian groups would eventually force the Navajo out of the region, and by the mid-19th century there were few permanent settlements. The territory was a vague and often disputed border region between the Spanish Viceroyalty of New Spain, French Louisiana and British Oregon throughout the late colonial period.

Following the 1819 Bathurst–Onís Treaty[2], what is now Navajo was recognised as Spanish territory, as the border between New Spain and Britain-in-America was drawn. Although the territory soon passed to Mexican control when Spain recognised the former colony's independence, with the 1828 Poinsett–Camacho Treaty[3] subsequently confirmed the agreed border. The territory would again be disputed between Mexico, Texas, and later California during the 1830s and 40s, until the end of the Mexican War and the signing of the Treaty of Toluca[4], which set the Texan-Californian border at the Colorado River. Navajo became part of Texas' unorganised western territories until 1868, when the "First Nations Reserves" was formally established.

Beginning in 1849, there was friction between Texans and Amerindian groups beyond the Rio Grande, as settlers and the army moved into the newly acquired regions and clashed with the already established indigenous peoples. Beginning in 1860, these Amerindian peoples, including the Ancestral Diné, the Puebloan and Apache peoples, were forced to cede their lands to the Texan government and relocated into what is now Navajo. These forced relocations became known as the Long Walks, or the Texan Trail of Tears, and saw the removal of some 40,000 Amerindians from their ancestral homelands in western Texas to the area around the San Juan River. Disease, famine and warfare during the relocations result in approximately 5,000 dying before reaching their destination. In 1868, the First Nations Reserve was established, and any remaining Amerindians were forcibly relocated and effectively interned in the territory.

From 1868 to 1934, the reserve was governed as a military territory, with little to no civilian involvement. During these decades, a form of ethnogenesis began to take place amongst the Amerindian peoples, who came to regard themselves as different clans of the same people - the "Navajo". The collective trauma of the Long Walks was critical to the development of a cohesive identity amongst these disparate groups as a single people. Traditional culture and language flourished in this period, despite military oppression, with intermarriage amongst the Amerindian groups creating new clan structures and cultural blending. The territory was spared any military action during the First World War, but the rise of the homegrown self-determination movement brought reprisals from the federal government until the formal creation of the Navajo Nation as a separate, but equal, state of the republic.

During the Great Depression, the Navajo Nation was subjected to forced livestock reduction by the federal government resulting in damage to centuries-old practices, as well as the income and financial stability of many families and clans in the state. Throughout the middle of the 20th century, Navajo remained apart from the rest of Texas, subjected to different and stricter governmental restrictions compared to the other states. Residents of Navajo, who were of Amerindian descent, were restricted from the freedom of movement guaranteed under the constitution, and therefore could not leave the state to live and work elsewhere. These limitations gave rise to a sense of isolationism amongst the Navajo people, further strengthening their familial and cultural ties, and their cultural identity distinct from the rest of Texas. The rise of the Civil Rights movement across North America in the 1960s eventually led to the end of these restrictions. In the subsequent decades, the Navajo Nation has been granted additional powers from the federal government, in addition to those given to other states, further preserving their cultural independence.

In the 21st century, Navajo is home to a unique culture on the continent, where Amerindian culture, language and traditions continue to be followed and celebrated. Navajo boasts a robust democratic system, with elements of direct democracy at the local and state level. The state economy remains dominated primarily by the agriculture and cattle industries, with the services, tourism and manufacturing sectors seeing increased growth in recent decades. Culturally, the state remains very traditional, with most older residents seeing themselves as solely Navajo, while the younger generations are proud Texans, they also celebrate their cultural differences. Women continue to be politically dominant at the local level, a legacy of the matrilineal system of governance. In 2006, the Texas Congress passed an act that recognised "the Navajo as a nation within Texas", further enshrining their cultural and legal distinctness in law.

t2y52ek.png

The 2017 Navajo gubernatorial election was held on October 31, 2017, to elect the Governor of Navajo, concurrently with the election of the Navajo High Council, two of Navajo's seats in the Texas Senate, the legislative elections to the Texas House of Representatives, and various local elections. Under the Navajo State Constitution, indivduals are elected to the governorship for a single seven-year term which is non-renewable, therefore incumbent Governor Russell Begaye was ineligible for re-election.

Unique amongst Texan states, Navajo is a de facto one-party state, with all political positions and elections held and contested by candidates from the Native Alliance. A broad tent movement that advocates for the rights of the Texan First Nations, the Native Alliance is in fact divided into several internal factions; the largest of which are the social democratic Broken Arrow and the liberal conservative Five Fires. Since the state's creation in 1934, the governor has always been a member of these two factions. Each faction holds primaries amongst their enrolled members in the state, with the winning candidates facing each other in the gubernatorial election.

Mary Kim Titla, a journalist, publisher and congresswoman, representing Broken Arrow, won the election with nearly 56% of the vote, defeating her opponent Jonathan Nez of Five Fires, the incumbent Speaker of the High Council. Titla was sworn in as the 12th Governor of Navajo on December 12, 2017, the second female governor in the state's history. In other elections, Five Fires remained the largest faction in the High Council, whilst losing a senator and representative to Broken Arrow.

yMZFJ35.png

[1] – This is the name given to the Navajo people who inhabited the area in ancient times and who predate the modern establishment of Navajo in 1868. It distinguishes the ancestral people form the modern creolised Navajo population, who are descended from a blending of all the Texan First Nations.
[2] - TTLs version of the Adams–Onís Treaty. Negotiated by Henry Bathurst, 3rd Earl Bathurst, the British Secretary of State for War and the Colonies, and the Spanish diplomatic envoy Luis de Onís y González-Vara.
[3] - TTLs version of the Treaty of Limits. Named after diplomats Joel Roberts Poinsett, for the British Empire, and Sebastián Camacho, for the First Mexican Empire.
[4] - TTLs version of the Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo. The Treaty of Toluca ended the Mexican War and recognised the independence of Texas and California as protectorates of the British Empire.
[5] - Tó Dínéeshzheeʼ, the state capital, is OTL Kayenta, Arizona.
[6] - Tóta', the state's largest city, is OTL Farmington, New Mexico.
 
Last edited:
Governors of Navajo

LeinadB93

Monthly Donor
And the follow up list of Navajo's governors:

rd293tC.png

Governors of the Navajo Nation (1934–)
11. 1934–1946 Chee Dodge† (Five Fires)
12. 1946–1954 Thomas Dodge (Five Fires)
13. 1954–1961 Paul Jones (Broken Arrow)
14. 1961–1968 Raymond Nakai (Five Fires)
15. 1968–1975 Jay Morago (Broken Arrow)
16. 1975–1982 Hashkasilt Begay (Five Fires)
17. 1982–1989 John Pinto (Five Fires)
18. 1989–1996 Peterson Zah (Five Fires)
19. 1996–2003 Mary Thomas (Broken Arrow)
10. 2003–2010 Joe Shirley Jr. (Broken Arrow)
11. 2010–2017 Russell Begaye (Five Fires)
12. 2017–2024 Mary Kim Titla (Broken Arrow)
 
Last edited:

LeinadB93

Monthly Donor
So with this extra free time, my head is going round and round with all the ways I can improve the quality of this series... Expect more new (and varied) content soon. It's very exciting :)

Thoughts on some redesigned flags and associated ideas:

Puerto Rico
CENTER]


Cuba
CENTER]


Santo Domingo / Quisqueya
CENTER]

With these three entities experiencing a different colonial history than OTL, I figured the flags needed changing from their OTL counterparts. In Puerto Rico the flag is meant to invoke OTL Hawaii, whilst also being distinct from the republican/nationalist revolutionary flags seen ITTL. Cuba and Santo Domingo / Quisqueya see flags that more evoke their colonial and royalist heritage, whilst linking to their own national symbols.

Spain (or should it be Castile)
CENTER]

With Spain having lost the Catalan countries in the 1860s, I thought the use of the red and gold from the Crown of Aragon was maybe inappropriate. Also the association of the OTL Spanish flag with the Francoist regime. A second thought was whether rump Spain ITTL should be renamed Castile, to reflect the loss of Aragon and Navarra *which is already reflected in the coat of arms).

Dominion of Carolina
CENTER]

I'm not too sure about this one, as it is maybe too close to OTL Confederate symbols... but it was an idea I had to get out of my head. And reflects a distinctive flag for Carolina.
 
I actually love all those designs! Particularly the Caribbean national flags, the Puerto Rican flag I think will both be unique and fit in a little more with rest of the UKE, The Cross being a local national symbol a la ITTL's Canadian Leaf and Floridian Cross. Don't have much of an opinion on the Spain/Castile, but the logic behind the removal of the yellow coloring makes sense. and Lastly the Carolinian flag I think probably makes more sense than the present one (also freeing you up to use that tricolor for some Missourian subdivision flag if you don't have any ready yet :p), and the design convergence with OTL confederate symbolism does still make sense ITTL, what with Carolina probably feeling the same remembrance-y feelings about the Republican rebellion that OTL southrons do the American Civil War.
 
I love all four of those flags, but especially the Cuba and Carolina ones. Sleek designs and they reflect the heritage for both countries ITTL. I don't think the Carolina one is too close to OTL Confederate symbols, honestly; there's no reason the color combination wouldn't exist ITTL, especially if the red on the right isn't representative of battle losses.
 
IIRC, the entry on the Western European monarchies implies that the Estado Novo regime never comes to power in Portugal. Yet Portugal still holds on to its colonial holdings until the 1970s like IOTL, which is strange because the only reason why they held on so long IRL was because the Estado Novo fought tooth and nail to keep them.
 
Spain (or should it be Castile)
CENTER]
With Spain having lost the Catalan countries in the 1860s, I thought the use of the red and gold from the Crown of Aragon was maybe inappropriate. Also the association of the OTL Spanish flag with the Francoist regime. A second thought was whether rump Spain ITTL should be renamed Castile, to reflect the loss of Aragon and Navarra *which is already reflected in the coat of arms).
Fun fact, IOTL the Spanish language is referred to as Castilian in the Spanish constitution and in most of South America. If Spain reverts to the old name of Castile, we could see the Spanish language referred to as Castilian by English-speakers.
 
@LeinadB93 In OTL, the US served to show that republics didn't work only as city-states (the belief of the time) and could work as large nations, so, withouth it, how did the French one not only happen but have the same ideological nature than OTL? While a revolution was fated to start at some point, how did it gain an republican tone when there weren't any big examples of it working on the scale of a country as large as France and the closest example it would have would be the Protestant and Glorious Revolutions?
 
@LeinadB93 In OTL, the US served to show that republics didn't work only as city-states (the belief of the time) and could work as large nations, so, withouth it, how did the French one not only happen but have the same ideological nature than OTL? While a revolution was fated to start at some point, how did it gain an republican tone when there weren't any big examples of it working on the scale of a country as large as France and the closest example it would have would be the Protestant and Glorious Revolutions?
I mean, is there a reason the French can't simply be the first republicans instead of the Americans ITTL?
 
@LeinadB93 In OTL, the US served to show that republics didn't work only as city-states (the belief of the time) and could work as large nations, so, withouth it, how did the French one not only happen but have the same ideological nature than OTL? While a revolution was fated to start at some point, how did it gain an republican tone when there weren't any big examples of it working on the scale of a country as large as France and the closest example it would have would be the Protestant and Glorious Revolutions?
I mean, is there a reason the French can't simply be the first republicans instead of the Americans ITTL?
France was on the road to revolution before the America war of independence, I think someone earlier in the thread actually mentioned that without the war of independence the revolution might have happened earlier than in OTL.
 
@LeinadB93 In OTL, the US served to show that republics didn't work only as city-states (the belief of the time) and could work as large nations, so, withouth it, how did the French one not only happen but have the same ideological nature than OTL? While a revolution was fated to start at some point, how did it gain an republican tone when there weren't any big examples of it working on the scale of a country as large as France and the closest example it would have would be the Protestant and Glorious Revolutions?
Even without the example of the United States, I think the monarchy would still be tainted by association with France's misfortunes.
 
France was on the road to revolution before the America war of independence, I think someone earlier in the thread actually mentioned that without the war of independence the revolution might have happened earlier than in OTL.
That's true, but the POD here is sometime in the 1600s or sooner, which gives more than enough time for butterflies to mangle the events that led up to the OTL French Revolution.
 
By the way, canon information given by Leinad on discord (all is canon except indication):
The MMP system used by the UKE has a threshold: either 1% of the vote empirewide (2.3 million), or 1% of the seats empirewide (4+).
In 2015:
- The People's Alliance for Democracy (Populists) got 1.55% of the vote nationwide (calculated, non-canon)
- The British Republican Movement (BRM) got 0.21% (~486,000)
- Team Trump (TTr) got 0.15% (~350,000)
- Others accumulated 0.41% of the vote (calculated, non-canon)
 
Here's a question considering the current global situation and as this is a type two timeline will there be a pandemic in this timeline at some point.

If there is one where will it originate, will it become a pandemic or will it be stopped in time, how will the UKE, EU, Soviet Union, Commonwealth of Nations and the common travel area respond to it and due to how different nations are to their OTL equivalent how will it effect them.

Considering one of actual creators of the OTL EU is warning that the virus could end the European project entirely, it would be interesting to see if a the difference in this version of the EU can hold up.

The UKE is a transcontinental nation so it will have to by design respond quickly to threat, and which will effect the Commonwealth of Nations with them being far more unified and connected in TL.
 
Top