Al Grito de Guerra: the Second Mexican Revolution

Rafael Caldera? You mean the father of Venezuelan Democracy?
Yep, him. And sorry to go back on my previous statement, but he won't factor into this next update...though he will show up sooner or later, of that you can be sure.

I found this TL earlier in the week and just finished catching up with it. I'm really enjoying it! I find this period fascinating for how the country was so volatile, and I think you've done a great job of exploring those tensions and taking Mexico down a different path than OTL. I am admittedly not terribly knowledgable about Mexican history so I can't give deep analysis on plausibility, so I appreciate the footnotes you give to 'show your work'— and it certainly seems good to me; in particular, I think using the death of Cárdenas' wife is a really clever POD. Looking forward to seeing what else you have in store!

PS: Hey, is this the TL you were talking about in response to a wikibox I made some months back (where Cárdenas became president), anguishing about how I beat you to the punch on some ideas…? If so, you really had nothing to worry about— this is definitely its own thing (and much more creative and interesting, for that matter).
Yep, that's the one! Don't worry, I wasn't being entirely serious then. :openedeyewink: I'm very glad you're enjoying this timeline! I've been planning it for close to a year now, and I'm happy to see that it's going over well. The next update should be up sometime over the next couple of days. I'm on vacation now, so there might be a bit of a delay.
 
Last edited:
Part 13: 1990 Mexican presidential election, 1990 U.S. Senate election in Texas
The Mexican presidential election of 1990 bore little semblance of freedom or openness. The turmoil of the preceding two-and-a-half years had been a direct result of the contentious election of 1988, and no PRI figure—least of all the party’s presidential nominee, Manuel Bartlett—was in the mood for a fair fight. In many ways, Bartlett had already been running the country for over a year, so his inevitable victory on November 15 was to be more an anointment than a popular endorsement.

It was feared that an independent, left-wing candidacy would only exacerbate the unrest. So, in August, Bartlett used his power as Government Secretary to ban the FDN from fielding a presidential candidate, on the grounds that it was associated with the terrorist ELM and therefore could not be trusted with executive power. Still, a totally uncontested election would have been unfashionable—the United States was watching its southern neighbor closely, and while President Bush had little problem with the leftists being shut out of the running, he expected there to be at least a pretense of competitiveness in the election. So the PAN was permitted to run an opposition candidate. Manuel Clouthier was still tired out from his 1988 campaign, so instead, the party settled on 72-year-old industrialist Luis H. Álvarez, who had also been the PAN’s presidential nominee in 1958. Álvarez ran a quiet campaign, his advanced age preventing him from making many speeches or campaign appearances.

Not that it mattered anyway. The nationwide press was increasingly falling under direct government control, and state-run media outlets ignored Álvarez's campaign so much of the population was not even aware that Álvarez was running for President. When election day came, Álvarez was simply not on the ballot in many states, and in the rest, DFS, Army and state police troops kept careful watch over the polls in opposition-friendly areas to ensure that voters made the "right" decision. Bartlett's landslide victory, therefore, was a foregone conclusion.

MexicanPresidentialElection1990.png

On December 1, 1990, Bartlett was sworn in as President. On February 16, 1991, twenty-one caciques across southern Mexico were brutally murdered in a shocking, if shoddily-organized, ELM campaign. Over the course of a single day, the homes of 43 highly influential landowners throughout Chiapas, Guerrero and Oaxaca were set upon by squads of well-armed men and women affiliated to the ELM. Half of these attacks failed: in nine cases, the assailants were repelled by their target’s bodyguards, while in thirteen cases, the assailants broke in, only to find that their targets were not at home. British historian David Brading has alleged that as many as thirty additional attacks were planned, but fell through because the attackers never received their weapons, failed to meet up at the appointed time or were detected by Army patrols. Nevertheless, by the following morning, 21 rural overlords were dead, their estates reduced to scorched piles of blackened rubble.

The direct effect of the “Night of the Long Guns” (as David Brading would later term it) upon rural Mexican society was negligible. Twenty-one guardians of the PRI social order may have perished, but hundreds more were still alive to do its bidding. However, the raids did prove that the revolutionary underground was capable of shocking feats of organized violence, and, two days after the attacks, the ELM claimed responsibility and demanded that all “class oppressors and fascist PRI warlords” leave the region or face further ferocity. Most heeded the warning: over the next few months, almost half of all caciques—including nearly all in northern Chiapas, northern Guerrero, eastern Oaxaca, and even many in southern Veracruz—would flee in terror, while many of the rest would secretly ally themselves with the underground campesino movement in exchange for physical security.

Flecha'sHouse.jpeg

In October 1990, the tiny hamlet of Paso Achiote in western Chiapas was ransacked by gunmen loyal to local cacique Isidro Flecha. Shockingly, after Flecha was shot in both kneecaps and left to die in his burning mansion four months later on the Night of the Long Guns, the villagers proved rather uncooperative with government investigators. [1]​

This made it very difficult for the central government to enforce law and order, let alone investigate the raids. Over the previous fifteen months, caciques had been instrumental in enforcing martial law, helping federal authorities identify local “troublemakers” and contributing their own private gunmen to government raids on suspected terrorist hideouts. Now that most of the local power brokers had fled or switched sides, federal authorities found it nigh-impossible to maintain effective control over the region. The old guard PRI also collapsed in strength following the Night of the Long Guns. The caciques had always played a crucial role in preserving PRI hegemony, intimidating its opponents through use of force and using their political influence to bolster its authority in their locales; without their stewardship, that crucial strain of the PRI that stressed obedience to the President practically went extinct, paving the way for complete subversion of the grassroots-level PRI by radical campesinos. The campesino-controlled PRI organizations still followed party procedures and many were legitimized by turncoat caciques, meaning that the central government was largely unaware of the transformations the partido oficial was undergoing in the south.

By summertime, the entire region had become one big money pit for Los Pinos. Since January of 1990, the federal government had spent as much as $140 million keeping order in the south—money it could scarcely afford to lose, as it was now forced to spend $373 million every month to service its crippling debt to the United States. In June, President Bartlett reluctantly removed 8,000 Army and DFS troops from Chiapas, Oaxaca and Guerrero, taking the lack of major violence since February to mean that enough of the radicalized population had been jailed to prevent further unrest.

The main reason why President Bartlett agreed to recall the troops is because their services were required elsewhere. In July of 1991, fresh elections would be held for the Congress of the Union, and Bartlett wanted the PRI to regain its supermajority. To ensure this, Bartlett pulled federal forces out of the south and stationed them in opposition-friendly polling places, just as he had done for his own election campaign in November. Bartlett’s Government Secretary, “Don” Fernando Gutiérrez Barrios, [2] warned the President not to assume that the elections would go smoothly in the south, but Bartlett pooh-poohed his fears. After all, the PRI Congressional candidates in Chiapas, Oaxaca and Guerrero (all of whom had been selected by local PRI committees in the aftermath of the Cacique Raids) were running unopposed, and therefore guaranteed to win. What could possibly go wrong?

Don Fernando couldn’t answer, and neither could the rest of the world. Most of Latin America was fixated on Venezuela, where President Carlos Andrés Pérez successfully defended his government from a coup d’état in June. Andrés Pérez had taken power around the same time as Carlos Salinas, and had initially pursued a similar agenda of cutbacks and privatizations. But after watching Salinas’s neoliberal policies lead Mexico to economic ruin, Andrés Pérez reversed course, taking advantage of high petroleum prices (which had risen sharply following the Mexican oil workers’ strike in 1988) to increase funding for popular welfare programs, making his government much more popular among the Venezuelan people. In June of 1991, a radical socialist faction of the Venezuelan Army led by Lieutenant Colonel Hugo Chávez tried to take power in a coup, but failed miserably. Public opinion toward the coup plotters was almost overwhelmingly negative. Most of its leaders were arrested, while Chávez himself went into hiding. [3] Andrés Pérez and the rest of South America were therefore too distracted to pay much heed to events in Mexico.

Raul's House.jpg

Within a week after handing over his presidential sash, Raúl Salinas de Gortari had moved into a $62 million mega-mansion in Steinhausen, Switzerland. Critics pointed out that he couldn’t possibly have afforded the mansion without massive looting of the public coffers, but the Mexican press was silent on the issue, respecting the decades-long tradition of not criticizing former Presidents.

In the United States, however, the Mexican situation was getting ample attention from the political establishment, largely through the efforts of one man: Henry Cisneros. Cisneros had been the highly popular Democratic Mayor of San Antonio from 1981 until 1988, when he publicly confessed that he had had an extramarital affair and resigned to focus on reconciling with his family. Pundits declared the end of Cisneros’s political career, and when he announced a year later that he would run for Texas’s Class 2 Senate seat in 1990, he was almost laughed off the podium. [4] But critics underestimated Cisneros’s potential. He was a skilled political bridge-builder, having won broad support on all his mayoral campaigns from both liberals and conservatives. His Mexican heritage and Catholicism ensured near-universal support from Hispanics—indeed, Cisneros repeatedly stated that his inspiration to run for Senate had been meeting the tens of thousands of Mexican refugees who had fled their home country in 1989 to join Texas’s sizable Hispanic community, which he believed needed greater representation at the federal level.

Cisneros easily won the Democratic nomination, while the incumbent Republican Senator, Phil Gramm, saw a surprisingly strong primary challenge from former state senator Hank Grover, who lambasted Gramm for being “soft” on illegal immigration. Gramm subsequently took a hard line on immigration which was criticized by many as having discriminatory undertones. Gramm also repeatedly tried to use Cisneros’s extramarital affair against him, but this backfired, as Cisneros’s openness about the affair and seemingly genuine remorse meant that voters saw Cisneros as both an honest politician and a truly penitent Christian—two qualities which many felt were lacking in contemporary American politics. Of the two incumbent Republican Senators who lost their seats in 1990, few would have guessed that one would have been from Texas, of all states.

TexasSenateElection1990.png

Senator Cisneros quickly emerged as Manuel Bartlett’s harshest critic in Washington. Over the course of his term, he would introduce several Senate resolutions condemning the PRI regime, as well as a bill to leverage U.S. ownership of Mexican debt in order to force Bartlett to loosen his repression. As things continued to get worse for the Mexican people, Cisneros forced the American political establishment to acknowledge their hardship even when politically inconvenient. He soon grew into a champion not only of Mexican residents, but for Mexican-Americans and inner-city residents across the entire United States. And, as Mexican-American communities swelled with refugees and American cities were flooded with illegal drugs from Mexican cartels, Cisneros’s status as a rising star in the Democratic Party was secure.

Events7.png

__________
[1] Isidro Flecha was/is a real person. He conducted a raid on Paso Achiote in OTL April 1990, and to my best knowledge faced no significant repercussions for it.
[2] Who was Carlos Salinas's Government Secretary in OTL.
[3] In OTL, Andrés Pérez continued on with his neoliberal agenda, making his regime extremely unpopular among regular Venezuelans. Chávez's coup still failed, but he was still supported by much of the population, setting the stage for his pardoning and his eventual, successful Presidential run in 1998.
[4] In OTL, Cisneros did not publicly reveal his affair or run for Senate. Here, turmoil in Mexico has had a indirect, but clear, twofold effect on his political decisions.
[5] The OTL Democratic nominee was Hugh Parmer, whom Gramm beat in a landslide.
 
Last edited:
Bye, bye, Phil; don't let the door hit you on the way out (I never liked him)...

Yeah, what could possibly go wrong? Well, like, everything...

All it needs is a match...

Wonder what'll happen with Chavez...

Like Cisneros here (especially since he has changed his ways); looks like he'd be a good VP candidate in 1992...

Waiting for more, of course...
 
353 simultaneous attacks seems like way too many. This sort of coordination isn't exactly easy, to my knowledge nobody pulled off this sort of thing without being a state level intelligence agency in their own territory. Plan that broad has a lot of moving parts, one guy messing up can blow the whole thing if they get caught beforehand, and with that many odds are almost inevitable. Plus you have things like odds of one squad fudging the timing and kicking off early, one target somehow had a bunch of goons there who weren't supposed to be, someone lazy with the safeties blows the thing, Army patrol in the wrong place etc. Really punctures SoD something that big gets pulled off at all let alone perfectly, Murphy should really have a say
 
Wow, things are certainly continuing down a bad route. You have to feel sorry for Alvarez there, being dragged out to be the sacrificial lamb against Bartlett. If I'm not mistaken, wasn't Bartlett balls deep in with the Guadalajara Cartel and played some sort of a role in the killing of a US DEA Agent? If so, that's mildly concerning...

The bit about Venezuela is interesting, as that has the potential to have butteflies for both the 1993 and 1998 elections. Without the Puntofijo Pact parties being as discredited and the attempted coup not featuring as prominently, you could see the AD's Claudio Fermin win, or perhaps (and more likely IMHO) Rafael Caldera stays with COPEI and thus wins office again. In turn if things still go sour for the pact parties, you could see Venezuela go down a different route, perhaps with moderate leftist (compared to Chavez!) Andres Velasquez, conservative Henrique Salas Romer or Christian democratic ex-beauty queen Irene Saez, emerging victorious in 1998.

I have to admit I'm surprised only Texas deviated from OTL in the US Senate election in TTL's 1990. IIRC in New Jersey the race became close due to high tax rates and the lackluste campaign by the incumbent Democrat. With a worse economic picture nationally (I guess at least?) I could see a Republican pickup here.
 
Last edited:
Bye Bye Chavez.

Bartlett is probably the second coming of Porfirio Diaz, or even Santa Anna. I mean, that result is obviously bogus. They didn't even seem to make it close like in 1988. I give it two months before civil war starts.

I expected Cisneros to run for Governor, not Senate, but he's gonna be POTUS in 1992. It's been teased too much.
 
353 simultaneous attacks seems like way too many. This sort of coordination isn't exactly easy, to my knowledge nobody pulled off this sort of thing without being a state level intelligence agency in their own territory. Plan that broad has a lot of moving parts, one guy messing up can blow the whole thing if they get caught beforehand, and with that many odds are almost inevitable. Plus you have things like odds of one squad fudging the timing and kicking off early, one target somehow had a bunch of goons there who weren't supposed to be, someone lazy with the safeties blows the thing, Army patrol in the wrong place etc. Really punctures SoD something that big gets pulled off at all let alone perfectly, Murphy should really have a say

Yes- I immediately assumed that the new President was behind the attacks, because it beggars belief that an insurgency could carry out so many carefully coordinated attacks. Even in the event it was the Federales, I'd expect- as you say- for some attacks to happen too early or not at all.
 
Yes- I immediately assumed that the new President was behind the attacks, because it beggars belief that an insurgency could carry out so many carefully coordinated attacks. Even in the event it was the Federales, I'd expect- as you say- for some attacks to happen too early or not at all.
Eh, I think it was the Cuban Army intervening directly
 
Plus, while the Cubans were good- this is a major operation in a foreign country over a large area. That kind of precision simply isn't doable.
I don't think the US or the Soviets could have pulled off the operation as perfectly as it's described.
I think the best explanation is the Feds- because that way the reader can assume that the raids probably didn't go anywhere as smoothly as described, and what's being narrated in the official version put out to the public.
 
Bye Bye Chavez.

Bartlett is probably the second coming of Porfirio Diaz, or even Santa Anna. I mean, that result is obviously bogus. They didn't even seem to make it close like in 1988. I give it two months before civil war starts.

I expected Cisneros to run for Governor, not Senate, but he's gonna be POTUS in 1992. It's been teased too much.

Not necessarily. OTL there was a Special election in 1993 for Lloyd Bentsen's Senate seat when he became Clinton's Treasury Secretary. According to the box, Cisneros seems to serve out his full term.So it's possible that that might not happen exactly like that.

A larger sucking sound from South of the border might help another Texan in 92...
 
If I'm not mistaken, wasn't Bartlett balls deep in with the Guadalajara Cartel and played some sort of a role in the killing of a US DEA Agent? If so, that's mildly concerning...
You are not mistaken. This will be covered in detail in later updates.

The bit about Venezuela is interesting, as that has the potential to have butteflies for both the 1993 and 1998 elections. Without the Puntofijo Pact parties being as discredited and the attempted coup not featuring as prominently, you could see the AD's Claudio Fermin win, or perhaps (and more likely IMHO) Rafael Caldera stays with COPEI and thus wins office again. In turn if things still go sour for the pact parties, you could see Venezuela go down a different route, perhaps with moderate leftist (compared to Chavez!) Andres Velasquez, conservative Henrique Salas Romer or Christian democratic ex-beauty queen Irene Saez, emerging victorious in 1998.
Venezuela will look like a very different place when all's said and done in TTL. All I will say now is that I'm not done toying with the Venezuelan political system...

I have to admit I'm surprised only Texas deviated from OTL in the US Senate election in TTL's 1990. IIRC in New Jersey the race became close due to high tax rates and the lackluste campaign by the incumbent Democrat. With a worse economic picture nationally (I guess at least?) I could see a Republican pickup here.
The worse national economy is hurting the Bush administration more than it's hurting Congressional Democrats. The election is closer, and Senator Bradley is reduced to a plurality rather than a thin majority, but he hangs on anyhow.

353 simultaneous attacks seems like way too many. This sort of coordination isn't exactly easy, to my knowledge nobody pulled off this sort of thing without being a state level intelligence agency in their own territory. Plan that broad has a lot of moving parts, one guy messing up can blow the whole thing if they get caught beforehand, and with that many odds are almost inevitable. Plus you have things like odds of one squad fudging the timing and kicking off early, one target somehow had a bunch of goons there who weren't supposed to be, someone lazy with the safeties blows the thing, Army patrol in the wrong place etc. Really punctures SoD something that big gets pulled off at all let alone perfectly, Murphy should really have a say
Yes- I immediately assumed that the new President was behind the attacks, because it beggars belief that an insurgency could carry out so many carefully coordinated attacks. Even in the event it was the Federales, I'd expect- as you say- for some attacks to happen too early or not at all.
Eh, I think it was the Cuban Army intervening directly
Doubt it, still too many houses.
Plus, while the Cubans were good- this is a major operation in a foreign country over a large area. That kind of precision simply isn't doable.
I don't think the US or the Soviets could have pulled off the operation as perfectly as it's described.
I think the best explanation is the Feds- because that way the reader can assume that the raids probably didn't go anywhere as smoothly as described, and what's being narrated in the official version put out to the public.
Dang...after rereading this, I see now you guys are completely right. I'll admit I wrote about 60% of this update between 1 and 3 AM last night, and wasn't exactly in the most rational mindset when I looked it over this morning immediately after waking up from five hours of sleep. 353 attacks is far too many, and for it all to go without a hitch is totally implausible. Give me a little time to rewrite this part.

What would you guys say would be a plausible number of attacks—50? 75?— and how well do you think it could plausibly go? I need this operation to not fail completely for the plot's sake, but some messiness can work. Perhaps 20% of the caciques had armed goons at the ready who engaged with the attackers, successfully fending them off in, say, 4 in 10 cases. Some fighters are captured by police and Army troops, but they don't know much more about who's supplying them or ordering them around than the authorities do, and therefore little intelligence-related progress is made on rooting out the radicals. Only a few Cubans are captured, and they're not wearing uniforms and give the alibi that they came without the consent of Havana—the Mexicans find this hard to believe but have nothing to prove otherwise.

Maybe the coordination of the attacks is not bad—there are cases in which the attackers' guns do not fire, the attackers fail to meet together in the right place and time, and residents notify the local authorities causing certain attackers to be captured before they can go on the offensive. Overall, the operation has many problems, but succeeds in eliminating at least a few dozen highly influential caciques and paves the way for complete grassroots infiltration of the PRI by the radicals. Does that sound more believable?
 
Last edited:
Honestly- I don't think the number of attacks even needs to be as high as fifty.

What will scare the establishment is the coordination. That implies the existence of a serious, competent enemy. That means that some caciques will be spooked enough to flee to Mexico City or out of the country, or to hedge their bets by trying to reach out. Others will see enemies on their own side.

I'd say- oh... thirty to forty attacks launched. If only half of them are successful, it'll still represent a massive coup for any insurgency (Cuban or Mexican.) As always, the tale will grow in the telling- the PRI will assume that dozens of minor incidents that happen close by or on the same night will be part of the conspiracy, and that helps undermine things too.

Above all, remember that revolutionary moments- Red October, July 1789 in Paris, December of 1989 in Bucharest- happen not just because of revolutionary action or even government repression but because of panic in the regime.

The fact that the attack happened at all will be terrifying enough to set dominoes falling.
 
The Mexican presidential election of 1990 bore little semblance of freedom or openness. The turmoil of the preceding two-and-a-half years had been a direct result of the contentious election of 1988, and no PRI figure—least of all the party’s presidential nominee, Manuel Bartlett—was in the mood for a fair fight. In many ways, Bartlett had already been running the country for over a year, so his inevitable victory on November 15 was to be more an anointment than a popular endorsement.

It was feared that an independent, left-wing candidacy would only exacerbate the unrest. So, in August, Bartlett used his power as Government Secretary to ban the FDN from fielding a presidential candidate, on the grounds that it was associated with the terrorist ELM and therefore could not be trusted with executive power. Still, a totally uncontested election would have been unfashionable—the United States was watching its southern neighbor closely, and while President Bush had little problem with the leftists being shut out of the running, he expected there to be at least a pretense of competitiveness in the election. So the PAN was permitted to run an opposition candidate. Manuel Clouthier was still tired out from his 1988 campaign, so instead, the party settled on 72-year-old industrialist Luis H. Álvarez, who had also been the PAN’s presidential nominee in 1958. Álvarez ran a quiet campaign, his advanced age preventing him from making many speeches or campaign appearances.

Not that it mattered anyway. The nationwide press was increasingly falling under direct government control, and state-run media outlets ignored Álvarez's campaign so much that over half the population was not even aware that Álvarez was running for President. When election day came, Álvarez was simply not on the ballot in many states, and in the rest, DFS, Army and state police troops kept careful watch over the polls in opposition-friendly areas to ensure that voters made the "right" decision. Bartlett's landslide victory, therefore, was a foregone conclusion.


On December 1, 1990, Bartlett was sworn in as President. On February 16, 1991, hundreds of caciques across southern Mexico were brutally murdered in a campaign so swift and well-coordinated, it made the post-elections unrest of early 1990 look like a game of capture-the-flag. Over the course of that bloody Saturday, hundreds of squads of well-armed men invaded mansions all across Chiapas, Oaxaca and Guerrero, murdered their inhabitants (all of whom were powerful landholders with dominating influence over local PRI hierarchies) and burned them to the ground. By the following morning, 353 rural overlords were dead, their houses reduced to scorched piles of blackened rubble.

The Cacique Raids (or the “Night of the Long Guns”, as British historian David Brading would later term them) shocked the nation. Security forces were called in immediately; The Army presence in Oaxaca and Guerrero was doubled almost overnight, while Chiapas Governor Patrocinio González Garrido quickly invoked the Regional Security Law, requesting 4,500 Army and DFS forces to help regain control. But by the time the peacekeepers arrived, the mysterious attackers had vanished, slinking back into the agrarian wilderness almost as swiftly as they had emerged. The attackers made no public statements, gave themselves no name and claimed allegiance to no particular organization—not even the ELM, though it was widely suspected that they were to blame.


In October 1990, the tiny hamlet of Paso Achiote in western Chiapas was ransacked by gunmen loyal to local cacique Isidro Flecha. Shockingly, after Flecha was shot in both kneecaps and left to die in his burning mansion four months later on the Night of the Long Guns, the villagers proved rather uncooperative with government investigators. [1]​

Over the following three months, efforts to identify and capture suspected raiders became increasingly brutal. Army evacuations of rural hamlets was doubled, while the DFS’s arbitrary arresting of suspected terrorists nearly tripled. But, by summertime, the entire region had become a money pit for the federal government. Since January of 1990, the federal government had spent as much as $140 million keeping order in the south—money it could scarcely afford to lose, as it was now forced to spend $373 million every month to service its enormous debt to the United States. In June, President Bartlett reluctantly removed 8,000 Army and DFS troops from Chiapas, Oaxaca and Guerrero, hoping that enough of the radicalized population had been jailed to prevent further unrest.

The main reason why President Bartlett agreed to recall the troops is because their services were required elsewhere. In July of 1991, fresh elections would be held for the Congress of the Union, and Bartlett wanted the PRI to regain its supermajority. To ensure this, Bartlett pulled federal forces out of the south and stationed them in opposition-friendly polling places, just as he had done for his own election campaign in November. Bartlett’s Government Secretary, “Don” Fernando Gutiérrez Barrios, warned the President not to assume that the elections would go smoothly in the south, but Bartlett pooh-poohed his fears. After all, the PRI Congressional candidates in Chiapas, Oaxaca and Guerrero (all of whom had been selected by local PRI committees in the aftermath of the Cacique Raids) were running unopposed, and therefore guaranteed to win. What could possibly go wrong? [2]

Don Fernando couldn’t answer, and neither could the rest of the world. Most of Latin America was fixated on Venezuela, where President Carlos Andrés Pérez successfully defended his government from a coup d’état in June. Andrés Pérez had taken power around the same time as Carlos Salinas, and had initially pursued a similar agenda of cutbacks and privatizations. But after watching Salinas’s neoliberal policies lead Mexico to economic ruin, Andrés Pérez reversed course, taking advantage of high petroleum prices (which had risen sharply following the Mexican oil workers’ strike in 1988) to increase funding for popular welfare programs, making his government much more popular among the Venezuelan people. In June of 1991, a radical socialist faction of the Venezuelan Army led by Lieutenant Colonel Hugo Chávez tried to take power in a coup, but failed miserably. Public opinion toward the coup plotters was almost overwhelmingly negative. Most of its leaders were arrested, while Chávez himself went into hiding. [3] Pérez and the rest of South America were therefore too distracted to pay much heed to events in Mexico.


Within a week after handing over his presidential sash, Raúl Salinas de Gortari had moved into a $62 million mega-mansion in Steinhausen, Switzerland. Critics pointed out that he couldn’t possibly have afforded the mansion without massive looting of the public coffers, but the Mexican press was silent on the issue, respecting the decades-long tradition of not criticizing former Presidents.

In the United States, however, the Mexican situation was getting ample attention from the political establishment, largely through the efforts of one man: Henry Cisneros. Cisneros was the highly popular Democratic Mayor of San Antonio from 1981 until 1988, when he publicly confessed that he had had an extramarital affair and resigned to focus on reconciling with his family. Pundits declared the end of Cisneros’s political career, and when he announced a year later that he would run for Texas’s Class 2 Senate seat in 1990, he was almost laughed off the podium. [4] But critics underestimated Cisneros’s potential. He was a skilled political bridge-builder, having won broad support on all his mayoral campaigns from both liberals and conservatives. His Mexican heritage and Catholicism ensured near-universal support from Hispanics—indeed, Cisneros repeatedly stated that his inspiration to run for Senate had been meeting the tens of thousands of Mexican refugees who had fled their home country in 1989 to join Texas’s sizable Hispanic community, which he believed needed greater representation at the federal level.

Cisneros easily won the Democratic nomination, while the incumbent Republican Senator, Phil Gramm, saw a surprisingly strong primary challenge from former state senator Hank Grover, who lambasted Gramm for being “soft” on illegal immigration. Gramm subsequently took a hard line on immigration which was criticized by many as having discriminatory undertones. Gramm also repeatedly tried to use Cisneros’s extramarital affair against him, but this backfired, as Cisneros’s openness about the affair and seemingly genuine remorse meant that voters saw Cisneros as both an honest politician and a truly penitent Christian—two qualities which many felt were lacking in contemporary American politics. Of the two incumbent Republican Senators who lost their seats in 1990, few would have guessed that one would have been from Texas, of all states.
Senator Cisneros quickly emerged as Manuel Bartlett’s harshest critic in Washington. Over the course of his term, he would introduce several Senate resolutions condemning the PRI regime, as well as a bill to leverage U.S. ownership of Mexican debt in order to force Bartlett to loosen his repression. As things continued to get worse for the Mexican people, Cisneros forced the American political establishment to acknowledge their hardship even when politically inconvenient. He soon grew into a champion not only of Mexican residents, but for Mexican-Americans and inner-city residents across the entire United States. And, as Mexican-American communities swelled with refugees and American cities were flooded with illegal drugs from Mexican cartels, Cisneros’s status as a rising star in the Democratic Party was secure.

View attachment 449711
__________
[1] Isidro Flecha was/is a real person. He conducted a raid on Paso Achiote in OTL April 1990, and to my best knowledge faced no significant repercussions for it.
[2] Remember from the last chapter that these PRI committees have all been infiltrated by ELM allies—and now that the caciques are all dead, these committees are free to select whoever they want without interference from the old guard PRI’s point men. Therefore, nearly all the PRI candidates for Congress in southern Mexico are secretly friendly to the Movimiento. What could possibly go wrong, indeed.
[3] In OTL, Andrés Pérez continued on with his neoliberal agenda, making his regime extremely unpopular among regular Venezuelans. Chávez's coup still failed, but he was still supported by much of the population, setting the stage for his pardoning and his eventual, successful Presidential run in 1998.
[4] In OTL, Cisneros did not publicly reveal his affair or run for Senate. Here, turmoil in Mexico has had a indirect, but clear, twofold effect on his political decisions.
[5] The OTL Democratic nominee was Hugh Parmer, whom Gramm beat in a landslide.
I doubt that without the chaos of thr Caracazo Chavez would attemp a coup, in fact if everything is going so well for the country and the government as the update say he wouldn't have anybody to follow him through the attemp, he would just be a lunatic. Its like Mussolini attempted the March on Rome in a no WWI tml where everything is going perfect in Italy. Without the collapse of the for 4th republic I don't see what other oportunity to enter politics he had.
 
I doubt that without the chaos of thr Caracazo Chavez would attemp a coup, in fact if everything is going so well for the country and the government as the update say he wouldn't have anybody to follow him through the attemp, he would just be a lunatic. Its like Mussolini attempted the March on Rome in a no WWI tml where everything is going perfect in Italy. Without the collapse of the for 4th republic I don't see what other oportunity to enter politics he had.

The Caracazo still happens, because despite higher oil prices Andrés Pérez’s initial privatizations still anger the people of Caracas. I was going to include a sentence in there about how the Caracazo only lasted six days rather than nine, but deleted it to save space.
 
The Caracazo still happens, because despite higher oil prices Andrés Pérez’s initial privatizations still anger the people of Caracas. I was going to include a sentence in there about how the Caracazo only lasted six days rather than nine, but deleted it to save space.

Of course his embezzlement allegations could still come out ITTL... God CAP did a lot to ensure Chavez came to power...
 
I rewrote the bit about the Night of the Long Guns to reduce the number of successful attacks and cover the effects in greater detail. What do you guys think? Is it more believable this way?
 
I rewrote the bit about the Night of the Long Guns to reduce the number of successful attacks and cover the effects in greater detail. What do you guys think? Is it more believable this way?

Yes, it is, @Roberto El Rey. BTW, I wonder if Selena Quintanilla-Perez survives longer than 1995 ITTL (and what role she'll play; she is from southeast Texas and later moved to Corpus Christi with her family)...
 
Top