Chapter I: Churchillians and Halifaxites
Churchillians and Halifaxites

Churchill really didn't like being War Minister - but more so than that, he really did not like Halifax's attitude. Despite what could in his eyes be seen only as a miracle being achieved i Dunkirk, Churchill felt Halifax was turning away from his country's interests. Halifax had contacted the Italian Ambassador already requesting Italian and Swedish mediation in the talks between the Allied and Axis powers and was keen to press forward - Churchill Vehemently opposed this at every cabinet meeting. For the last week a war cabinet meeting had developed into a typical cycle; some kind of report on the enemy's advances is read, Halifax speaks once again of the desire for peace, Churchill equates it to a crime against history. Churchill however was merely a voice - not a Prime Minister. He had no ability to physically force the Prime Minister to do anything, but equally he could not stand while the Prime Minister did nothing but give in. It was only upon taking the bus to Westminster for the first time in a moment of solitude and loss hoping for some kind of guidance that Churchill decided his best course of action. He was often known later as a leader who would speak among the people to take a measurement of the mood of the nation - this was no poor example. He asked the men and women travelling to work that day if they felt hopeful, if they felt peace should be the solution, if they felt that even if it were to endanger Britain's future if they'd still fight on - and the answer was resoundingly that Britain must fight to the end, and so it was brought to Halifax. Churchill had expressed his doubts many a time before in cabinet as aforementioned, but never with such vigour as on February 18th.

churchill-halifax-1-0720-e1500566655820-551x309.jpg

Churchill argued that peace would mean the end of Britain, that it would mean centuries of proud Britons would be forgotten and Britain's place as a second rate power in the world would be assured. Halifax was having none of it, to him peace was the only hope of survival of the empire, Britain's way of life and it's independence. Churchill was then faced with a dilemma, either stay and face the collective responsibility of remaining in Cabinet, or go and fight his agenda with other means. He chose to go - and on February 21st 1939 - Churchill resigned as War Minister to Prime Minister Halifax. He stepped out to the steps of the war ministry and decried his argument for going on with the struggle with the passion and emotion of a true statesman, and then set forth for Westminster. There he was greeted by cheering supporters from both aisles of the chamber as he addressed the house on the reasons for his resignation and called upon the nation to take up arms against the threat he had called out from the beginning. He too was joined by Anthony Eden - now rather known for his hawkish views - who would resign from cabinet as Foreign Secretary triggering an internal crisis in Government. Seeking to restore calm in Government, Sir John Anderson would be appointed Secretary of State for War - a promotion from Air Minister that would be taken by Harold Macmillan, shortly after along with Kingsley Wood who would become Foreign Secretary, a promotion from First Lord of the Admiralty.

It was only now that Halifax really became unsure of his position as Prime Minister and his position on the war. Public support fell behind Churchill in the days following his resignation with calls for Halifax to be challenged or even for him to form his own party as he had done after the last great war under the "Constitutionalist" banner. He could not stand down as Prime Minister however; the King refused to permit it, so he remained to lead a war he could not win backed up by a party who didnt like him. He did have one advantage though; a majority in Parliament and broad enough support to lead without being questioned too much, something that would come in handy a month later. On February 28th, having stopped their advance to secure the northern pocket, German began Fall Rot - or Case Red - by advancing towards Paris. For over a week now the French had been in contact with Prime Minister Halifax calling for peace talks immediately which he had accepted, but Germany - when contacted through Italy and Sweden - declined to discuss talks immediately. They would have been stupid to do so when they faced little real resistance now in France and by pushing forward and taking Paris they would be in a much more sensible position to negotiate - especially now the allies had given away their hand by requesting talks at all. The Germans advanced; however to a much better prepared French army, costing time and resources that could have been better used against the Soviets, but Hitler was willing to look past immediate costs in favour of a more secure peace in the west.

Hitler%2Bin%2BParis%2B2.jpg

France, having had time to dig in and secure it's position, gave Germany a significantly harder fight for the next few days, but by March 5th Paris was declared an open city by the French Government who at this point had accepted the inevitable defeat by Germany. Hitler had defeated the French, and Britain's leaders too now feared the worst. It was only on the 10th of March when German jackboots marched down the Champs Elysees that Hitler, through the Italian Government, indicated he would be willing to discuss peace. The French - broken without their capital and now accepting of their total defeat - were willing to discuss terms and brokered negotiations with Germany immediately, Halifax now faced the final decision on peace. With Churchill now finding newfound enthusiasm and forming a new alliance with Anthony Eden and a select group of more hawkish Conservatives and members of the Opposition, Halifax found himself in a position where he had to choose between his own conscience about the future of the country and his political interests. By suing for peace he faced the possibility of massive electoral consequences or even being ousted as PM - but equally in his own eyes he saw it as the only way to save his country. Were he to continue the war, reports suggested Germany could invade within a year while Britain barely even had enough guns to arm it's infantry and too few bunkers to stop German tanks if they got onto land. He sought advice of the King and of Chamberlain, who himself was very unwell and distraught at the state of the nation, both of whom advised him to lead with his conscience and to be decisive - even if it means being unpopular - and so Britain and France collectively sued for peace with Germany.

Yugoslavia, having been drawn into the war by the Allies, too faced the choice over it's future. With many of the country's ports under occupation by Italian forces and it's army dug in but woefully unprepared to fight the over a million German forces soon to transfer from France Prince Paul chose to go to a peace with Honour. Little Yugoslavian land had been captured, his army had fought stoically and he was in a position of strength while in a few months he could be in a set of German Handcuffs - his choice was made. The Allied forces of Britain, France and Yugoslavia (along with the exiled Czech Government) announced their intention to seek a ceasefire to decide terms for Halifax's so called 'peace with honour' on March 12th 1939 with the aim for a cessession of hostilities at midnight of March 13th 1939. Hitler accepted the proposal on the same day and German forces officially stopped advancing that evening with the ceasefire being introduced officially at midnight of the 13th as planned. The decision, as expected, among Britons was deeply unpopular - Churchill himself labelled it "a surrender from dark rooms". So unpopular in fact was the decision that even Labour labelled the Prime Minister a coward, accusing him of refusing to form a unity Grand Coalition Government in the name of weakness and inability to act; something that made some Conservative MPs wonder whether the decision was the right one.

9dcb9ae32554804aea86398c03c984f1.jpg

Hitler initially demanded that the Allied surrender be negotiated in the exact spot it had been in the last great war, the Palace of Versailles. The Allies however refused, suggesting that the position while under German control was too unstable a place to reach an agreement for both sides and instead agreeing to meet in the city of Stockholm, the capital of Sweden, due to German desire to get on with the peace and move on to the USSR. With representatives of both sides, including Prime Minsters Halifax and Edouard Daladier, Prince Paul of Yugoslavia (representing King Peter), German Army Chief Wilhelm Keitel and briefly the Fuhrer Adolf Hitler himself they began on March 18th 1939, accompanied by Swedish and Italian observers. A peace in the west was to be struck.
 
Will Churchill seek reconciliation with America?
Guess you'll have to see if he gets in power at all!

I'm looking forward to the cold war's effects on American politics and such. I'm assuming that a axis victory would make America very interventionist aganst facist threats
I'm rather looking forward to writing it, i'm pretty excited to get off the damn second world war and get on with it. Plenty of interesting stuff i wanna cover... i suspect this TL may go on for some time. Keep reading and you'll see!

I think that the Halifax-Churchill conflict will be really interesting to follow. The changed dynamics could have rather significant consequences and with Churchill in the position of subordinate things are bound to get raucous.

A great update, I look forward to more like it.
Cheers for the support! I've rather enjoyed thinking of how the dynamics between the two can play into the story and have some good ideas which you'll see soon!

Will there be pro-American India?
Guess you'll have to find out :p have payed particular attention to India though so it should be interesting reading.

Cheers for reading all!
 
Chapter I: A Peace in the West
one question will the nazis collapse in 92 or will they last on.
Well i guess the best way to answer that is with a question - the USSR 'collapsed' because it was a coalition of nationstates bound together by one central body that lost authority; whereas Germany definitively will have some minority nationalities (czechs etc) but that doesn't mean they'll hold any power - let alone even necessarily even want to divide the country. So if there is no 'group' of nations to collapse, could it ever truly collapse? Furthermore there is no strategic or geopolitical reason for Germany to collapse then in that year specifically, but i shan't spoil what will happen as who knows - it may collapse sooner or later than then. I will say ive modelled this Cold War off strategic theory, not copying events that happened historically in a Nazi context, so dont expect it really to be anything similar except some notable events.

A Peace in the West

Hitler had very little interest in the details of how peace happened, but he had goals and a vision for how he could dismantle the west's power for good. So after hearing all the preamble he stood up in total silence and left the room, instead going back to the special German quarters in the Drottningholms Palace where the peace was to be discussed after being kindly offered the space by the King of Sweden. Negotiations were left instead to Wilhelm Keitel and Joachim von Ribbentrop - the most senior Nazis in Germany at the time representing the military and political interests of the German side. What Hitler was did do however was set forward a series of vital areas that Germany must secure in order to "secure the peace". Germany had to first ensure that France would not be in a position to challenge the Reich for a significant amount of time, if not forever - to do that Germany would annex former the former German region of Elsaß-Lothringen from France along with a vast strip of territory that was culturally and historically French stretching from Calais to the Italian border. These regions were to be established as a puppet Government as part of Himmler's pet project for a so called Burgundian State that was to include Flanders and parts of Wallonia. Furthermore Luxembourg and most of Wallonia would be annexed by Germany and the Netherlands be placed under Military occupation by Germany led by a Military Government for a period of five years.

The first full set of German demands were;*
- The annexation of Luxembourg, Eastern Belgium (Wallonie) and Slovenia.
- The recognition of the German occupations of Poland, Czechoslovakia and Denmark.
- That Germany be allowed to annex the region of Elsaß-Lothringen from France
- The establishment of a German Dependency in a state of Burgundy to be guided towards independence by Germany and established solely by Germany
- The right of expulsion of any (formerly) citizen of France from the new state of Burgundy and seizure of their property and lands
- That a ten year ‘friendship treaty’ be signed between the belligerents.
- That the German fleet be allowed to use British and French ports in the Mediterranean.
- That France should limit her military to 250,000 men and that her Navy, Armoured forces and Air Force should be cut accordingly.
- That France cede the island of Madagascar to the Germans.
- That Yugoslavia cedes Medimurje, Prejmurje, Backa and Baranaja to the Kingdom of Hungary.
- That Yugoslavia cedes Macedonia to the Kingdom of Bulgaria
- That Yugoslavia releases the nation of Montenegro to be established as a protectorate of Italy and cedes regions surrounding Ablania to the Italian protectorate of Albania.
- That Yugoslavia cedes the cities of Sibenik and Zadar to Italy
- That German vessels are guarenteed use of the Suez Canal

swed6129-bw.jpeg

To the allies these terms were a disaster, but unfortunately many of the terms were not easily rejectable - they were the defeated power, but they could stop some of the major terms. The advantage of negotiating as a bloc rather than as individual nations was that one nation could not be subjected to vast and damaging terms without another protesting. Unfortunately when one power is entirely defeated however, as France was, there is little an alliance can do in terms of protecting them alone except stop their total destruction as a nation. But nontheless the allies set out clear terms for peace should they reach an agreement.

The Allied powers red lines for negotiations were simple;**
- That Germany respect the neutrality of Norway
- That Yugoslavia's independence and broad territorial independence be secured
- That the Governments of the Netherlands and Belgium be restored
- That Germany agrees to a naval treaty limiting it's fleet size to avoid threat to the UK
- That under no circumstances will the Western Powers accept war guilt or will pay indemnities towards the German State.
- That under no circumstances will Germany demand the transfer of French Fleet vessels to German Control

The Germans were far keener on the idea of dismantling France as a threat than they were towards securing control of the Netherlands and as such after several days of discussions the two sides would eventually agree that the Government would leave the country after a phased withdrawal and the pre-existing Government would be invited to return. Germany too would agree to the request that the west pay no indemnities or accept any war guilt and to respect the independence and neutrality of Norway despite concerns from some of the German Delegation over access to Steel. However in return for these demands being met, they expected the full concession of the territories demanded from France and Belgium to ensure German security. This was a very bizzare request in the eyes of the British and French; the idea of creating a country from scratch to the western Governments seemed ludicrous and somewhat of a pet dream by a senior Nazi - something that was not an unfair assessment. Their main confusion was the fact that this new state had no real historical basis for existing, when questioned on the matter the German delegation barely even knew what it's purpose was other than to provide a buffer between France and Germany. The nation was to be named as the Order-State of Burgundy (or Ordensstaat Burgund) after the ancient Kingdom of Burgundy that collapsed over 450 years before in it's last attempted revival. It's capital would be the city of Nancy which was to be brutally expelled of all French citizens then renamed Nanzig and the country's language was to become German with phased transition away from French. The Germans however were beset on the idea, and despite the best efforts of the British to guarentee the future of Belgium, eventually it became clear that Germany would not accept anything but their full demands in that area. Despite the matter being discussed for over a week - virtually the duration of the talks - France eventually agreed to concede the territory in the name of peace and their independence, as well as the fact in backrooms Britain remained loyal to the idea of taking it all back at a later date once the Allies were ready.

For such a massive concession Germany was required to guarantee French security for a decade - a joint German demand anyway - and would become legally bound to treat formerly French citizens in the territory with respect to their property and rights. Germany lost the right to seize the land of and expel French citizens from the newfound 'country' unless the holders of the land had fled the country and while France would be required to recognize the new state no other state was bound to do so. Furthermore a French civilian mission would be invited by the new 'Burgundian Government' to observe the establishment of the country in the interest of protecting French citizens from abuse of power - however this mission would act on a purely advisory and observational basis and held no power to change or affect policy of the Burgundian Government. Finally, and by far the most important victory on the matter from the British Government, France would also be permitted to maintain a standing army of 400,000 men - nearly doubling the initial proposal but still forcing the country to remove 500,000 men from it's standing military. These terms were incredibly difficult for France to accept, and incredibly difficult for the French cabinet to accept, but ultimately for the sake of ensuring the continuity of their nation at all after threats by Germany to continue the war and abuse the French people they agreed to the decision, but not without broad and notable opposition. If it was not for the fall of Paris, it is likely Germany would have been unable to demand so much of France - but this was now their Versailles.

gXEc0Mc.png

While watching in shock and sadness as their new different borders were drawn onto a map France was however willing to part with Madagascar. An irrelevance of an island, Germany's interest in it was of no interest to the French Government, though Britain did question the decision only to be refused any information by the German delegation. But France was not the only state that was to lose territory, Yugoslavia too suffered serious losses to various neighbours with Hungary seizing small parts of the north east of the country due to historical claims, Germany taking much of Slovenia and Italy occupying areas surrounding Albania. The British did however manage to secure the Yugoslavian coast by rejecting the demand that Italy take the cities of Zadar and Sibenik, arguing this would overly conflict interests due to lack of Italian claim on the region and their observation of the new treaty. This was a small win for Prince Paul's Government who were grief stricken by the loss of so much land with so little real fighting on their side during the war. Paul however was not an unrealistic man and accepted that to refuse to concede now would see his whole nation destroyed - it was better to protect Yugoslavia independence than to lose it all. As such Yugoslavia accepted the transfer of territory to Bulgaria, Italy, Hungary and Germany on the condition that they be permitted to arm themselves as they saw fit and that Hungary and Italy relinquish any and all claims on Yugoslavian territories, along with assurances from the German Government that it would not interfere with the various Croat self determination movements in the north of the country.

Britain would effectively lose nothing from the Treaty of Stockholm, which was signed officially by the included parties on March 29th 1939. Strategically the British had secured their eastern flank by ensuring the security of Norway, then to the best of their ability secured the independence of the Netherlands thereby protecting Britain from that angle of possible invasion and limiting German port access. Furthermore they had secured their own independence by refusing the so called "friendship treaty" while protecting themselves from German naval advances through the continuation of Britain;s initial naval treaty with Germany. The loss of Calais and Dunkirk to Germany was however taken as a serious blow to the British Government - so much so that it threatened to undermine the treaty entirely due to it's proximity to Britain. Germany however then changed their policy the following day; the story having been that upon hearing of the vocal British opposition to the annexation of Northern France Hitler had agreed to permit the British - and the British alone - to effectively annex the city of Calais. Believing this to be a concession by the Reich in order to ensure British trust in the German wish for peace Hitler hoped that this would belay any direct fears that Germany could invade Britain from the region at any time - a massive strategic problem for the United Kingdom. The British Government first sought that the French be permitted to hold Calais of course, however it became clear soon after that Hitler had no interest in the French benefiting at all from the peace - but as he had been claimed to have many times before he even became Chancellor he apparently had a subtle admiration for Britain and hoped that they might even support Germany. This led to Britain seeking French approval to administer and run the city under British control which was accepted with a handshake agreement that the French would de-facto run the administration of the city while the British military protected it. Prime Minister Daladier took the decision as the best opportunity to secure peace while protecting French citizens in Calais from subjection from Germany and the French cabinet agreed the deal shortly there after.

~ THE TREATY OF STOCKHOLM ~
1) Germany shall annex to their control the nation of Luxembourg, the region of Wallonia and the region of Alsace-Lorraine.
2) Germany shall retain and the Allied Powers shall recognize a continued occupation of the nation of Denmark, along with the nations of Czechoslovakia and Poland for a period to be determined by the German Government. Furthermore the allied powers will recognize the annexation of the region of Slovakia by the Kingdom of Hungary.
3) The nation of the Ordensstaat Burgund will be established from the city of Nanzig out of territories determined and agreed upon by the German Government and the Government of France.
4) The Government of France shall agree to limit the size of their armed forces to 400,000 men with their air force, armoured units and naval vessels limited accordingly - no naval vessel shall be permitted to be transferred to the control of the German Reich.
5) The Independence of Norway and the Netherlands will be guarenteed by the German Government for a period of ten years.
6) The Island of Madagascar will be annexed by the German Reich.
7) Upon the establishment of the Ordensstaat Burgund France will be invited to dispatch a civillian mission to the country to observe the transition towards Burgundian rule there from French and Belgian Governance.
8) The port city of Calais shall be granted on a 50 year lease to the United Kingdom to govern and administer the city as it sees fit.
9) The Kingdom of Yugoslavia will transfer the historically claimed region of Macedonia to the Kingdom of Bulgaria, along with historically claimed regions of Northern Yugoslavia to German and Hungarian control.
10) The nation of Montenegro shall be released by the Kingdom of Yugoslavia as a protectorate of the Kingdom of Italy and territories surrounding and claimed by the nation of Albania too shall be transferred to Italian control.
11) Germany, France, Yugoslavia and the United Kingdom will agree to a pact of non-aggression for a period of five years during which the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and the United Kingdom will be permitted to rearm should they determine it best to do so.
12) Italy and Hungary shall relinquish any and all historical claims on the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and guarantee the independence of the nation for a period of ten years.
13) Germany and the United Kingdom will renew the Anglo-German Naval Treaty 1935.
14) The German Reich shall guarentee the Republic of Turkey for a period of ten years in order to secure British and French interests in the Middle East.


German%2Bofficers%2Brelax%2Bat%2Ba%2Bsidewalk%2Bcaf%25C3%25A9%2Bon%2Bthe%2BChamps-%25C3%2589lys%25C3%25A9es%252C%2Ba%2Bmonth%2Bafter%2Bthe%2Binvasion%2Bof%2BFrance%252C%2BParis%252C%2BJuly%2B1940.jpg

Britain had protected her allies from annihilation, even despite the losses sustained in territory, national morale, and strategic protections from invasion that Britain had held for the last few centuries. Halifax, at least in his eyes, had protected the empire from destruction, and more importantly ensured that Britain now could go on to focus on preparing to hopefully liberate Europe once Hitler's back was turned. After all, really in geopolitics even agreements are on paper are worth no more than the other player's word. The international response to the agreement was dramatic and mixed, the British Empire had been defeated at what they supposedly did best, the French had been pushed back to borders from over five hundred years prior and Germany had established itself as the effective dominant power in Europe - though one hated by many of it's neighbours and regarded on the international stage as the cause of the conflict. In the US President Roosevelt expressed his 'regret that the Relatively free and democratic nations of Britain, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Denmark, Poland and Czechoslovakia were defeated at the hands of a regime of self slaughter and annihilation of free rights'. But Many in the American public simply didn't feel the same level of sympathy as relatively anglophile Roosevelt did - especially among the Mid Western States where formerly German migrants now marvelled at the successes of Hitler.

In France the response to the peace was a cocktail outpouring of grief, loss and rage - the French Communists staged vast rallies against the Government and while the Government descended into panic at how next to act elements of the French military began to wonder if the Government could go on - or even if they should accept the peace. Daladier would resign only a matter of days after Stockholm was agreed with the French Government being led instead by Prime Minister Paul Reynaud who decided to press the agenda of secret rearmament and alliance with the UK. In Britain Lord Halifax took to the radio to address the nation and sell his peace with Honour, but recieved only grief by the public in whom's eyes this was an irrational defeat before the war had even started. Vicious rumours about the involvement of the King, Halifax's sympathies with the Nazis and attacks on German-British citizens along with members of the British Union of Fascists erupted overnight as the country accepted the new found arrangement. Churchill, along with a significant portion of the Conservative Party immediately resigned the party whip after refusing the vote for the treaty in the house - instead expressing their intentions to form their own grouping and leaving the Prime Minister with a razor thin Majority in the house, barely enough to pass the new treaty. While In Japan the Emperor congratulated Hitler on his victory in Europe and himself eyed up potential prizes in Asia - but in Moscow the response was a mix of concern and surprise, Peace meant Stalin's position had become far less tenable and now he turned to ensuring the Red Army was prepared for what leading Germans had talked about constantly under Hitler; Drang Nach Osten - the drive to the east.


----------------​
*Some of these points were kindly borrowed from Fletch in their excellent TL on Halifax found here that i'd suggest reading if you have not
**Further points on the British negotiating position also borrowed from Fletch's perspective on the whole thing
 
I’m enjoying this TL so far - nice work! Britain will be in a very interesting position in the upcoming Cold War - unfriendly with the Americans and perhaps even openly hostile to Nazi led Europe. I wonder if they’ll lead a commonwealth side which is significantly weaker than the Americans and Nazis.

Edit - I notice the Germans demanded the use of British and French naval bases in the Mediterranean, but this was not mentioned any further after the list of German demands (as far as I could see) and was not mentioned in the final peace? While perhaps the demand for the use of French bases would be accepted, I can’t see the British agreeing to such a demand - it damages their strategic position massively in the Mediterranean, especially with it ‘hinted’ in the update that the British are open to war with Germany in the future to regain what was lost.
 
Last edited:
Edit - I notice the Germans demanded the use of British and French naval bases in the Mediterranean, but this was not mentioned any further after the list of German demands (as far as I could see) and was not mentioned in the final peace? While perhaps the demand for the use of French bases would be accepted, I can’t see the British agreeing to such a demand - it damages their strategic position massively in the Mediterranean, especially with it ‘hinted’ in the update that the British are open to war with Germany in the future to regain what was lost.

Yeah in regards to that Britain was never going to accept that as - like you say - it would compromise their naval supremacy in the region they seek to maintain in order to be secure for the future, however i forgot to add that detail in the write up. Shall add a snippet in about it when i have a moment - however generally if it isn't in the full treaty assume it didn't happen. Anyway Glad you're enjoying it!

Im sure everyone will appreciate the horrific border gore i have created XD
 
Very interesting, usually the Nazis take all of Western Europe Into their empire or sphere,this time you seem to not to have given the Nazis all the cards, in the negotiations
 
Madagascar? Is it for deporting jews?
Sadly, as per real life - yes. Though despite the terrible policy being implemented as it would have been in real life it has a somewhat better ending.

Very interesting, usually the Nazis take all of Western Europe Into their empire or sphere,this time you seem to not to have given the Nazis all the cards, in the negotiations
While a continuation of the war in the west might have led to the Nazis occupying all of France for example as you say, they would never have broken Britain - not without defeating the Merchant navy at sea which was frankly unlikely especially if the US later joined the war. Therefore if an actual peace was sought in 1939 - rather than an armistice as France used in 1940 in real life - France would have been left independent like Germany was after Versailles, but at great cost. So as a result the allies still exist in the west, France remains independent but effectively a shell of it's former self with little real capability of retaking the territories lost within a decade and Britain remains a major power - but one out of the war. Germany's political influence on the continent would be massive and virtually any state on the mainland would fear it for fear of invasion or isolation, but Britain will - as you will see later - be able to create a security blanket for nations like Norway who have a sea border with the Nazis or some kind of geographical obstacle for them that allows the nations not to be forced to bow before Hitler.

Basically this is what a realistic peace in Europe would have been if Britain had given in after the fall of Paris.

Why didn't Italy press for Corsica?
Wasn't directly involved in the war, territories granted in Yugoslavia were based on claims by Italy that were somewhat unfulfilled after the Great War. Corsica therefore was not granted to them as they didnt actually declare war on France due to lack of preparation.
 
I feel like it is only a matter of time for the peace in the West to break apart, and the British getting a big ass-kicking. France seem likely to collapsed and revolt against Paris, Germany moves in to bring on the Vichy. Norway bails on London, and allies with Berlin.

War Plan Red anyone?
 
Im wondering if a french facism might emerge. The British essentially gave a Huge portion of the country to the Huns,not to mention adding Calais to the kingdom, while the germans have humiliated so utterly. I could see a ultra natonailist force emerging to try to destroy the dastordly Albions and Savage huns.
 
Last edited:
Sadly, as per real life - yes. Though despite the terrible policy being implemented as it would have been in real life it has a somewhat better ending.
.

It says a lot that as horrible as the Madagascar Plan would have been (for both Jews and African), someone from our timeline can say "you got off easy".
 

Anchises

Banned
Nice TL!

I think the whole Ordenstaat Burgund situation is very interesting. It's essentially bound to fail especially if one considers that the legitimate Belgian government has massive problems with tensions between Flanders and Wallonia.

Forced Germanization and new French territories will make these tensions much worse...
 
I'm greatly enjoying this. I'm curious as to what will happen in the next parliamentary elections in France and the UK. From what you've written it seems like the Tories in the UK and moderates are screwed in France, so that leaves the door open for Attlee's Labour and either the PCF or some far-right French entity to make gains in the next elections.

Should be interesting to see what happens in the US presidential election in 1940 if FDR doesn't run again. Could see an election between either Hull or Garner and Willkie, Taft or Dewey, which would be interesting if an isolationist like Taft (especially) or Dewey emerged victorious.
 
Should be interesting to see what happens in the US presidential election in 1940 if FDR doesn't run again. Could see an election between either Hull or Garner and Willkie, Taft or Dewey, which would be interesting if an isolationist like Taft (especially) or Dewey emerged victorious.

Would anyone be surprised if Charles Lindbergh has political ambitions?
 
Top