From what I've heard later on they switched the 'Classy Subjects' and 'Trashy Subjects' spots later on.
Jkjk
But to be fair this is fairly accurate for the Zhou Dynasty, albeit massively simplified.
For a first map that's very good! The various tribes do make the map kind of hard to pick out the larger nations.This is my first map, any comments would be appreciatedView attachment 302841
Ah, so could be that the island down and left of the central blob and very close to it is Sri Lanka?India apparently is inside the big continental mass (Chindia? Wait, no, Indochina!). Chinese didn't realize it had a triangular shape; the only division is the river Ganges (and good luck finding it on the map...)
This is my first map, any comments would be appreciated
The Chinese had trade relations with Greeks and Romans for thousands of years, in one form or another. And it was either show the southern Barbarbarians who lived off in the West or the Pirate Dwarves to the east, so I am happy with them choosing to show the Europeans at all. Unless Japan is where I was thinking Luzon or Taiwan is on the map?Kind wondering why India is nonexsistent but Greece is in there
Oh fuck off, that's not fair. Your supposed map is supposed to look like shit, not art.This is my first map, any comments would be appreciated
This is my first map, any comments would be appreciated
WIP of Wonder (and yes, it is hard to try to figure out where little statelets would go in land that isn't even above water anymore )
Norman itself not even being that of a distinct French dialect, when compared to Picard-Wallon continuum or Franco-Provencal. I'm honestly unable to get the logic behind this classification.I'm pretty sure I can spot Jèrrais, Geurnésiais and Sercquiais in there for example, which really should be considered dialects of Norman.
Norman itself not even being that of a distinct French dialect, when compared to Picard-Wallon continuum or Franco-Provencal. I'm honestly unable to get the logic behind this classification.
Well, they tend to be different from continental Norman or from each other, because they were normalized differently and at different periods; but the main division of Normand is rather Normand proper (which gather the northern part of Normandy including isles), and southern Normand (which tends to be a transition zone with Francien*), than a continental/insular divide.Are the Island dialects notably more different do you know?
I suspect much of the logic is historical. Old Norman not only had a stronger North Germanic influence but was quite far flung (a court language from Antioch to London)Norman itself not even being that of a distinct French dialect, when compared to Picard-Wallon continuum or Franco-Provencal. I'm honestly unable to get the logic behind this classification.
This is my first map, any comments would be appreciatedView attachment 302841
How did the Blackspian Sea come about? Or is this not based on a real world (albeit inverted) scenario?