Status
Not open for further replies.
The success of the merchandise-driven animation model, in particular Transformers, led the Harmony Gold production company to adapt three unrelated Japanese anime series, Super Dimension Fortress Macross (1982), Super Dimension Cavalry Southern Cross (1984), and Genesis Climber Mospeada (1983), into a three-season multi-generational saga called Robotech in 1985 with tie-in toys by Matchbox. The hybrid series received positive ratings and good viewership and quickly found a dedicated audience. Unfortunately for Harmony Gold and Matchbox Toys, the more mature themes and deliberate pace of the anime series compared to the Sunbow productions attracted an audience that skewed older, and thus less likely to buy the toys (this was before the collectable toy craze). It was by some accounts the genesis of the US anime fandom, which would eventually become a profitable niche market in its own right[3], but for the time being, though, Robotech managed to fail in its primary goal of selling lots of toys to the “Boys ages 8-12” demographic.
I kind of wonder if Jim Henson would had any thoughts on the Macross portion of Robotech. "Force of Arms" was always a chilling episode to me because the Zentradi rain of death killed most of the Earth's population, rendering the RDF's victory a highly phyrric one.

Hopefully, Carl Macek has better luck with the Robotech movie TTL.
And yet, most in the industry saw the satire as the “last gasp of a dying man”, for Disney TV animation was at a severe disadvantage. By 1985 Disney remained the only studio to make near exclusive use of in-house animation. Following the collapse of the animation unions in 1982, most studios had moved a majority of their animation overseas, in particular to Japan where costs were much lower thanks to the dollar-yen exchange rate, but where quality remained acceptable or even good. The other studios looked at Disney with confusion at the time. It cost up to 20-40% more per cel of animation for Disney than for, say, Toei. While the quality of the story and the Disney animation were typically superior, the profit margins for TV made it risky. Even super-hits from Disney like Muppet Babies were less inherently profitable than middling hits from other studios like My Little Pony. It appeared to the other studios to be either pride or folly on Disney’s part that drove the decisions rather than economic reality. Disney’s DATA technology mitigated this cost differential somewhat through automated compositing and the reuse of background sequences, each slightly altered digitally, but most in the industry assumed that the implosion of Disney TV animation was imminent.
It should be interesting to note that Tokyo Movie Shinsha animated for Disney shows Ducktales and The Adventure of Winnie-the-Pooh OTL so they may have to have to bite the bullet and outsource. However, the animation quality of both those shows was actually much better than, let's say, the Toei-animated episodes of Transformers. Plus, there could be some benefits to working with TMS down the line. It would tickle me pink if Henson convinced Disney to distribute Akira through Fantasia.

And before I forget, I thought I would bring up Gargoyles creator, Greg Weisman. He's currently working to the editorial staff at DC Comics at this point ITTL but eventually went to work for Disney as a development executive after completing graduate school. Would it be far enough for the butterflies to do their work, or is it possible that he would work under Henson?
 
If they did I doubt it would be through Fantasia.
Yeah. Hyperion sounds like the best bet if they even attempt to distribute Akira at all. For all we know, it could be a different company entirely that does this tough deed.

Might I suggest Hollywood Pictures, just to stick it to Disney and show how much anime is desired in the States to the Suits in charge?
 
If they did I doubt it would be through Fantasia.
Yeah. Hyperion sounds like the best bet if they even attempt to distribute Akira at all. For all we know, it could be a different company entirely that does this tough deed.

Might I suggest Hollywood Pictures, just to stick it to Disney and show how much anime is desired in the States to the Suits in charge?
Alrighty. I was taking a shot in the dark, but I do wonder just how much of an impact Disney/Hyperion or Hollywood Pictures would have on the film's gross. It made $1,000,000 for its limited US release in 1989. Would there be a wider release if either picked it up?
 
Jim never seemed to object to getting involved beyond TMNT and that was the king of the 80s violent cash cows. Maybe it's because it had a few more layers than the others, to say the least. I know for a fact that the characters were more complex then than folks give them credit for. What many people don't remember is that the first time April O'Neil was held captive in the show, I.E. the first episode, it was by the Turtles themselves and we even saw the negative consequences she had to endure for it.

In the case of the TMNT (well, splinter in the compactor aside) the violence is generally campier and more commedic and doesn't go out of its way to "glorify war", or so I assume Henson would think. TMNT also arguably is based on a real IP (the comic) and the merch came later, rather than directly and shamelessly marketing the toys like GI Joe or He Man. Again, my assessment of the man and where he'd creatively interpret his values or not.

That does bring up an interesting question, with Henson at Disney does his Creature Shop still work on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and if so does Fantasia or Hyperion release it?

TMNT will come up.

I kind of wonder if Jim Henson would had any thoughts on the Macross portion of Robotech. "Force of Arms" was always a chilling episode to me because the Zentradi rain of death killed most of the Earth's population, rendering the RDF's victory a highly phyrric one.

Hopefully, Carl Macek has better luck with the Robotech movie TTL.

It should be interesting to note that Tokyo Movie Shinsha animated for Disney shows Ducktales and The Adventure of Winnie-the-Pooh OTL so they may have to have to bite the bullet and outsource. However, the animation quality of both those shows was actually much better than, let's say, the Toei-animated episodes of Transformers. Plus, there could be some benefits to working with TMS down the line. It would tickle me pink if Henson convinced Disney to distribute Akira through Fantasia.

And before I forget, I thought I would bring up Gargoyles creator, Greg Weisman. He's currently working to the editorial staff at DC Comics at this point ITTL but eventually went to work for Disney as a development executive after completing graduate school. Would it be far enough for the butterflies to do their work, or is it possible that he would work under Henson?

On Robotech I think Henson would have recognized from the start that it was intended for mature audiences and not a vehicle to sell toys to 8 year olds.

Most of the OTL Disney animated TV shows were indeed done in Japan. In OTL Disney broke the Union in '82 and started outsourcing their animation like everyone else. Here the Union still has some leverage. But with the high costs of it all, something will have to chnge for TV animation to stay profitble.

Akira will come up. I'm still working through my thoughts on Weisman & Gargoyles.
 
Akira will come up. I'm still working through my thoughts on Weisman & Gargoyles.
If Weisman is currently working in DC Comics in this timeline, how about we see Gargoyles as a DC comic book instead of as a Disney cartoon? Why would I choose that change?

1: Gargoyles, the show, was clearly made to piggyback on the success of Batman: The Animated Series.
2: After the show ended, Weisman was responsible for The Spectacular Spider-Man and Young Justice, which the former is regarded as one of the best Spider-Man shows of all time, and the latter is based on a DC comic book.
3: If the Gargoyles series still gets made in the 90's, it would most likely be part of the DCAU, which would possibly add another great show to the universe's appeal to both casual and hardcore DC fans.
 
If Weisman is currently working in DC Comics in this timeline, how about we see Gargoyles as a DC comic book instead of as a Disney cartoon? Why would I choose that change?

1: Gargoyles, the show, was clearly made to piggyback on the success of Batman: The Animated Series.
2: After the show ended, Weisman was responsible for The Spectacular Spider-Man and Young Justice, which the former is regarded as one of the best Spider-Man shows of all time, and the latter is based on a DC comic book.
3: If the Gargoyles series still gets made in the 90's, it would most likely be part of the DCAU, which would possibly add another great show to the universe's appeal to both casual and hardcore DC fans.

God, I hope not. Or if it is part of the DCAU, it's only part of the DCAU and never becomes part of the comics shared universe. Gargoyles was good because it allowed for character development, it was kept control of by its creator right the way through, and because they weren't afraid of shaking up the status quo. If it got added to DC...

I mean, as one example, Xanatos was a good villain because they kept his writing consistent. If he became 'A DC character', he'd inevitably suffer decay at the hands of whoever took the character on later.
 
God, I hope not. Or if it is part of the DCAU, it's only part of the DCAU and never becomes part of the comics shared universe. Gargoyles was good because it allowed for character development, it was kept control of by its creator right the way through, and because they weren't afraid of shaking up the status quo. If it got added to DC...

I mean, as one example, Xanatos was a good villain because they kept his writing consistent. If he became 'A DC character', he'd inevitably suffer decay at the hands of whoever took the character on later.
Good point. Much as the cancellation sucked, the last thing Gargoyles needs is to be rebooted and/or recycled for the next three decades like TMNT was.
 
God, I hope not. Or if it is part of the DCAU, it's only part of the DCAU and never becomes part of the comics shared universe. Gargoyles was good because it allowed for character development, it was kept control of by its creator right the way through, and because they weren't afraid of shaking up the status quo. If it got added to DC...

I mean, as one example, Xanatos was a good villain because they kept his writing consistent. If he became 'A DC character', he'd inevitably suffer decay at the hands of whoever took the character on later.
Well, I suggested that butterfly based on what Weisman was doing at this point in this timeline, combined with his OTL career as of this year.

With that said, how would you react if someone like, say, Frank Miller or Rob Liefeld were to handle the Manhattan Clan? Be honest.
 
With that said, how would you react if someone like, say, Frank Miller or Rob Liefeld were to handle the Manhattan Clan? Be honest.

Miller: Xanatos is the real hero, an Ayn Rand style Objectivist Ubermench saving the city from evil socialists.

Liefeld: The Gargoyles use guns. Big. Fucking. Guns. Demona manages to show off her prodigious chest and backside in every scene, often at the same time against all anatomical possibility. Puck constantly breaks the 4th wall.
 
With that said, how would you react if someone like, say, Frank Miller or Rob Liefeld were to handle the Manhattan Clan? Be honest.

Liefeld can't draw consistently to save his life, and Frank Miller just doesn't do supernatural at all. On the other hand, I wonder what would happen to them 8n the hands of, say, Kurt Busiek, Geoff Johns, Jeph Loeb, Chuck Dixon, or even Judd Winnick. Not to mention how the art direction would have gone with George Parez, Bill Sinkiewicz, Mark Weringo, Esad Ribic, Jim Lee, or Mike Deodato.
 
Yeah, I do agree with Kalvan. Maybe even get a relatively obscure writer from OTL that got at DC because of small, unknown butterflies that add up to it.
 
Utter and total horror.
Miller: Xanatos is the real hero, an Ayn Rand style Objectivist Ubermench saving the city from evil socialists.

Liefeld: The Gargoyles use guns. Big. Fucking. Guns. Demona manages to show off her prodigious chest and backside in every scene, often at the same time against all anatomical possibility. Puck constantly breaks the 4th wall.
Liefeld can't draw consistently to save his life, and Frank Miller just doesn't do supernatural at all. On the other hand, I wonder what would happen to them 8n the hands of, say, Kurt Busiek, Geoff Johns, Jeph Loeb, Chuck Dixon, or even Judd Winnick. Not to mention how the art direction would have gone with George Parez, Bill Sinkiewicz, Mark Weringo, Esad Ribic, Jim Lee, or Mike Deodato.
I am under the belief that I apparently want to watch the world burn. Or at least, the respect people have for Gargoyles.
 
I am under the belief that I apparently want to watch the world burn. Or at least, the respect people have for Gargoyles.
I don't know about that. I would not mind seeing Goliath and Macbeth in Justice League Dark. What if Weisman took over Constantine ITTL and the Gargoyles made their appearance in a story arc. I like that. Then Constantine gets made as DCAU show. Yes please.
 
I don't know about that. I would not mind seeing Goliath and Macbeth in Justice League Dark. What if Weisman took over Constantine ITTL and the Gargoyles made their appearance in a story arc. I like that. Then Constantine gets made as DCAU show. Yes please.

Nah. Like I say, a major strength for Gargoyles is that it didn’t have ‘eternal status quo’. Keep it away from DC, or that’ll be its fate...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top