Mfw I go away five minutes and you guys go in a completely off-topic discussion that got one person kicked and another banned. Come on guys...
I hoped for more of a reaction to the side-story too. It has half of the usual amount of likes, which is somewhat disappointing to me. Perhaps it was too violent? Anyway, please share your opinions and like the update if you can. It means a lot.
(PS: I do hate that son of a bitch Wilson though).
... Oh dear, there will be at least some guerrillas fighting on even after everything is over.
Definitely. The South will not know real peace for a long time.
Can't blame him, kill my family and burn my home. And I be fighting to the bitter end If need be.
Reminds me of that Clint Eastwood movie in fact.
Yeah, I was totally thinking of The Outlaw Jossey Wales when I wrote this.
That's reminiscent of the backstory of a revisionist-Western antihero from the '70s or so! Very well-written start of darkness.
The ex-guerrilla will probably be a stock character of westerns ITTL.
Yeah, war is hell. This was a scene repeated often enough for a thousand years.
"You cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I will. War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it."
Putting these guerillas on trial would be a good way to earn some trust from the white southerners. And it would remove a rival armed force from amidst the official US Army and USCT forces left behind.
To rescue a post I wrote much earlier in the thread:
I do think the worst Union guerrillas deserve the noose as well. There will certainly be some that refuse to lay down their arms and will have to be chased and put down by the Federals.
Shades of Josey Wales/Seraphim Falls, whoa. That actually was like the OTL Jones County uprising, unrestrained brutality that left the young boys/men back home either dead or scarred like that kid Andrew. Great side chapter, ty for it Red.
An entire generation will probably bear physical and psychological scars due to the war.
Thanks!
Damn, that side story really captures the powerlessness of non-combatants in a warzone as well as the very murky nature of guerilla warfare, a lot of which I learned from my grandparents and their friends' experiences in my country's war of independence. I suspect that these guerillas would be romanticized by their respective sides (at least for the near future); the Unionist Jawhawks for staying true to the old flag and Confederate guerillas for defending their homelands against "Yankee" marauders. In truth and as shown here, plenty of guerilla bands were formed just to take advantage of the vacuum of power, acting like bandits and gangsters or fighting to merely settle old scores or finally dish out their frustrations against the old social order.
The great irony I see in this story is that Andrew actually shares some of the motivations the Unionist Jayhawkers had. Andrew is notably resentful against the rich big planters and is forced to hide his family's food supply from Confederate soldiers, their supposed protectors, which could have fueled resentment against the Confederate cause. However, the older men who Andrew looked up to were quite pro-Confederate and their sacrifices as well as news (real and false) about the Federal occupation of the South pretty much ended any Unionist sympathies. The ending, Andrew's descent to darkness, really illustrates how difficult reconciliation during Reconstruction will be. Like many Southerners by the war's end, he is bitter, vengeful and has absolutely nothing to lose.
In regards to other side stories, a look into the transition from the Union's conciliatory approach to hard-war policy and the enactment of Reconstruction measures would be an interesting look, especially from a Union soldier or Southern civilian's perspective. For example, there's the initial restraint by Northern soldiers to Southern civilians in hopes of preventing guerilla warfare, and then the defiance of Southerners leads Federal soldiers to resent them and the conciliatory policy. As the years progress, harsher and more heavy handed Union occupation policies were used such as expulsion, holding Southern sympathizers hostage and destructive retaliatory raids on enemy ground. There's also the interactions of liberated slaves and the Southern whites to consider especially as Reconstruction acts are passed.
You said just what I wished to convey with the update! Many guerrillas don't fight for romantic motives of flag and country, but to vent violent urges and kill to their hearts' content, using the war as an excuse. So many guerrilla units combine genuine Unionists or Confederates with psychopathic killers.
I liked this sidestory,
@Red_Galiray. Another reminder of the brutality and harshness of this war, and of the fact that evil men exist on both sides, no matter how much the Union has the moral high ground in the war as a whole. I wonder just how destructive this war has gotten by now, I imagine situations like these are getting commonplace.. also can't wait to see what ol' Breckinridge does next.
Yeah, even if the Union cause itself is righteous some men have appropriated it for less than righteous motives. Ultimately, war is cruelty, even one that so closely approaches being a just war as the Civil War.
I wonder what the total death toll in the South will be by the end of the war.
I know it has been brought up before and I believe Red said it was indeed a bit bloodier than OTL but not excessively so…yet.
Depends if you count only soldiers or both soldiers and civilians, which can be tricky since you'd first have to determine whether they should be counted at all. In any case, OTL Civil War estimates are usually from 600k to 1 million dead soldiers. ITTL, they range from 1 million to 1.5 million soldiers. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle. The greater death toll is due to the harsher war, but also to the deployment of hundreds of thousands more soldiers to fight guerrillas and protect the countryside. Though the guerrilla warfare does claim more victims, the great killer remains disease. As for civilians, here it would depend whether you count post-war violence and famine as part of the Civil War toll. I think that yes, they should be counted. Neither section is fighting a war of extermination that targets civilians, but with large land areas devastated by war, guerrillas swarming the countryside, and civilian populations fleeing the combat or even being expelled by the armies, the civilian death toll is much higher than OTL. I think it could range from 300k to 500k civilians, most killed by hunger, disease and privation. They are mostly Southern civilians, though people in the Border South have suffered a lot too. This means that once the wounded are counted a grand total of 10% of the US has lost life or limb to the Civil War - an extremely traumatic experience that doesn't even take into account psychological wounds.