No problem! If you want, we can kindly discuss the details about Mexico at that time, and since I believe both of us speak Spanish, it should be very easy to do so.
My only consideration is that, as I said in the discussion of above, my perception is that, unfortunately, the rise of an autocracy in Mexico is basically inevitable, because positivism being a thing has made the intellectuals advocating for a hybrid regime that must enforce order in the country. Maybe if the Americans help a little with the Mexican economy, that can be avoided partially.
The main issue I can see if the Americans help Juárez actively is that there will be two contradictory opinions: that the US must enforce Mexico being in its sphere of influence (US), and that Mexico is a free and sovereign country (Mexico).
Thanks, I appreciate the offer.
I myself believe that Latin America is in a very dire position due to the way the independence wars developed. With how destructive they were, and given their inability to create good states instead only giving birth to caudillismo and dictatorships, it's very difficult to find a way to create prosperous democracies. That's why my other TL (sadly long neglected) has its POD in the Independence era. Here I'll just try to minimize the damage. Averting the Mexican Revolution would already be huge, I believe.
On sugar, given the greater scarcity of post-war labor, it might bring about 'Yellow Peril' earlier ITTL. IOTL Louisiana brought over Chinese coolies to work in the sugar plantations. The planters had hoped that the Chinese laborers' lower pay would force the freedmen to compete with them by asking lower pay to the planters... except the Chinese coolies instead chose to demand equal wages and refused to accept any violation of their contracts. The presence of Chinese coolies were arguably the seeds for the Chinese exclusion acts in the 1880s, pro-slavery men didn't like the coolies because of racial hierarchy and abolitionists did not want them because they feared that the coolie system would force the competing freedmen to accept conditions akin to slavery. The latter was not true, but I could see the debates accelerated ITTL.
It could be a sad illustration of the fact that less prejudice against Black people does not necessarily mean less prejudice against all minorities. Heck, I could see some African Americans being hostile to Chinese immigrants as unfair competition.
I read this, realized Jackson's men were about to go up against 54th USCT, and thought
"do you not know death when you see it, old man?"
Really, it's amazing how you can alter LOTR quotes to fit this series.
"Come not between the liberator and his slavocrat prey, Southerner, or he shall not spare thee in thy turn. His blades and arms shall bear thee to the fields of Armageddon, below the Mason–Dixon line, where thy body shall be annihilated and thy immoral cruelties shall be left naked before the rights of man."
I'm glad to see you reading that update
It's one I'm rather proud of, and given the number of likes it's also one of the most well-received by my dear readers. A moment that will echo down in history, for sure.
Considering the talk of Confederates fleeing the country, maybe we could have Confederado-style communities be a thing in South Africa or even Australia ITTL in addition to being somewhat more prominent in Brazil?
I'm not sure about Australia, I doubt the British would like that. South Africa... maybe.
Sounds like a perfect excuse opportunity for the United States to do an imperialism liberate the nation from ex-confederate control.
I, for one, welcome our new American
overlords liberators. Though, anything that smacks of filibustering is bound to meet a hostile reaction.
This might be way too early to bring up. But does a US that cares more for Black people consider annexing Liberia?
I agree with
@Arnold d.c and
@Jord839 here. Besides being rather unrealistic, it's also something I personally wish to avoid.
Somewhat tangentially related to this topic, maybe we could see bigger Confederate emigration from the US into countries like Brazil or South Africa?
Fun fact: One of Brazil's most famous singers of the 20th century, Rita Lee (who unfortunately died this week) is a direct descendant of Confederate emigrants and her surname Lee is an homage to Robert E. Lee (
https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/c8877j8ylx9o (You can use Google Translate))
Brazilian Confederates is also something wild. Ironically, they might be the only ones that can actually claim to be all about heritage, not hate.
So its now 1945 for the Conferency and the end is coming. Considering all the hints I seen about the post war aftermath, the South might see close to Paraguay levels of destruction from the war of the triple alliance and a post war famine. I do wonder how grand Lincoln eventually funeral would be, I can see him having a much bigger legacy in this TL and casting a huge shadow over future presidents. Especially as I see the president a sort of like the Doctor from Doctor who.
Hate to be the guy who comes after him, because those are some big shoes to fill and high standards.
When Lincoln dies it's bound to be the grandest event. I mean, this is the Savior of the Union right here. His legacy may be somewhat more complicated, since IOTL Lincoln being martyred somewhat helped his image. At the same time, the Lost Cause has tarnished it, and I sadly see a lot of modern people saying that Lincoln was a White Supremacist no better than Davis or Lee because he didn't free all the enslaved, execute all rebels, and transformed the US into a utopia on day one. They will pull 1856 quotes to say why Lincoln 1865 sucked.
I don't see the US army throwing cholera victims into water sources or doing ''who can slit the most prisoners' necks'' competitions.
Widespread atrocities would be necessary to approach triple alliance war levels of depopulation.
Not to mention that the Confederacy isn't sending armies made up of children to be decimated by glory hunger commanders
Indeed. Sometimes I believe people lose sight of the fact that my main intention is to try and build a better US at the end of the war. Some users have talked of "Paraguay is the objective," but it isn't because I don't want the South to be so devastated. It's unrealistic, since the Union was trying to conquer, not to destroy the South; it's counterproductive, since that is bound to make re-union impossible and would probably affect Black people just as much; and, frankly, it's somewhat mean spirited. My guiding light when writing has always been to have principles and idealism as the cornerstones of the TL. If I'm ever writing about the US Army mudering children just because, then I've lost myself.
Isn't The TL currently at 1861?
You've missed a few updated my friend lol. Curiously, the last update dealing with 1861 was posted three years ago, and we're now at 1864, so we're actually matching the pace of the real world.