It is meant to allude to the 1964 Brazilian Coup.Is this meant to be a Pinochet/Allende analogue, much like De Gaulle is TTL’s Peron?
Is this meant to be a Pinochet/Allende analogue, much like De Gaulle is TTL’s Peron?
The date alludes to the OTL Brazilian coup but I imagine the economic policies of this military dictatorship to be a rough equivalent to Pinochet's, with the caveat that TTL's version of neoliberalism doesn't look like OTL's.It is meant to allude to the 1964 Brazilian Coup.
D’oh of course 🤦♂️It is meant to allude to the 1964 Brazilian Coup.
That makes me curious - how different are various ideologies ITTL compared to our TL?The date alludes to the OTL Brazilian coup but I imagine the economic policies of this military dictatorship to be a rough equivalent to Pinochet's, with the caveat that TTL's version of neoliberalism doesn't look like OTL's.
Ah... you're so negative...There's no way this could possibly go wrong.
So what was the purpose of the whole Citizens Party schtick for Stassen? Gaining the vote of people who liked his administration hut were too partisan to vote for a Republican?
Yeah, pretty much. He also didn't want to have to deal with GOP infrastructure anymore and free to conduct business with Congress without having to rely on the Republicans in Congress. There's also more than a touch of megalomania to it too.So what was the purpose of the whole Citizens Party schtick for Stassen? Gaining the vote of people who liked his administration hut were too partisan to vote for a Republican?
Will he try to make it a serious thing, to take with him all the various new Republicans who came to prominence with him and take the place of the GOP?Yeah, pretty much. He also didn't want to have to deal with GOP infrastructure anymore and free to conduct business with Congress without having to rely on the Republicans in Congress. There's also more than a touch of megalomania to it too.
Are representative peers elected by a more restricted franchise, as in Ireland, or the same franchise as the MPs for the Commons?Great Britain: 1965 election
So to vote for the Lords you have to be the holder of a title. Titles in the peerage of Great Britain can vote in both the English and Scottish elections and titles in the peerage of the UK can vote in all of English, Scottish and Irish elections.Are representative peers elected by a more restricted franchise, as in Ireland, or the same franchise as the MPs for the Commons?