Excellent comments all around. To respond to a few:
Oof, had forgotten about the Nivelle offensive. And yes, the Central Powers are doing well here. The French Second Army has virtually ceased to exist as a full formation (I guess a lot of units have been transferred rather than them losing 70% of their entire combat strength as casualties). The (seemingly coming) French retreat from the area around Nice will give the Italians a city and a morale boost - admittedly likely nothing of any strategic worth around the area.
The French can fall back and entrench - the Italians may be (mostly) out of the Alps but they still have a good ways to go. Maybe holding the city will give them a better supply route if they can extend the rail network there (?) but not sure what it would give them strategically beyond taking a city on a map - or is there something I'm missing that gives them an advantage with it?
-The original Second Army has been effectively destroyed- some remnants of XX Corps are still floating around behind what was one
la Voie Sacree but that's about it. Nivelle is going to create a "New Second Army"- a piecemeal composition of different units pulled from Italy and other parts of the West. Think the opposite of OTL's troop rotation: rather than moving units through Verdun to minimise attrition, France has to wear its units down and then ship in a replacement from the least vulnerable sector they can find.
-I should have mentioned in Post #905 that before the mutinies in the French Army, we have to look at the Italian seizure of Nice. Not militarily important (not least because the Italians don't have the skill or strength for a Falkenhayn-style "mincing machine") but a political triumph. A lot of
poilus are going to die if for no other reason than, after losing Verdun, the French Government can't afford to lose another city.
-Windhover's post below sums up the effects of losing Nice perfectly.
From an operational military point of view it would I think be mostly useful for the navy. It would deprive the French of a forward naval base and (probably after some repairs) allow the Italians to use it themselves to operate easier in the northwestern Mediterranean. It would make an amphibious assault against Corsica a lot more realistic (although far from a guaranteed success, amphibious landings with WW1 technology is not an easy endeavor).
In a broader sense, the capture of Nice would probably mostly be a morale/political victory. It would be making progress in the war, capturing an area that Italy plans to annex which would give Cadorna and Sonnino the opportunity to sell to the troops and the homefront that the young men if Italy are not dying in wain. That the Italians/Cadorna/Sonnino are not incompetent and stuck while the Germans are conquering Verdun. It will allow the Italians to paper over some cracks, if it will stick depends on what happens later. It will be hard to break out of the Alps and the British blockade will keep hurting, but the as time goes on the French get closer to a general collapse with all that that would entail.
Losing Nice would also hurt the French morale at a time when they cannot take many more blows of that nature (not only losing against the Germans, but also the Italians!). And political leadership in neutral nations would likely also see this as a sign of France being incompetent and collapsing (not only losing against the Germans, but also the Italians!). Now this might not be completely fair, but then things related to perception rarely are.
100% correct all around. It's going to be the first visible, unambiguous victory for Italy in over nine months since they declared war on October 1, 1915, although it won't come cheap.
Will Nivelle have General Mangin lead the attack?
Anyone else would be too competent.
One of my favorite quotes regarding his offensive. "The army had expected a victory and gotten a massacre." In three weeks of the Chemin des Dames attack, the army had 30,000+ dead, vs 50,000+ in three months of the Somme. Of 10,000 Senegalese Tirailleurs in the initial assault, 6,000 were casualties. He also had over 200 tanks. Of 121 used on the first day, 81 were out of action by nightfall, 52 were knocked out.
Horrifying- and likely to be even worse in TTL.
The Somme is (possibly) going to be an emergency offensive by the British before they planned it/were ready for it to drwa off pressure from Verdun. Them hitting as hard as they can to force the Germans to stop and throw thier reserves up north. Depending on how the campaign goes, the Central Powers could be caught offguard.
Then again, Falkenheyn can very well be in a place that falling into defense in the south while the French try to break the seige of Verdun and holding in the North as the British use human wave assaults might well suit his plans. And he might even be a lot more limited of the (OTL) doctrine of counterattacking as soon as there's a breach in the trenches anywhere and be willing to just fall back a few kilometers at times.
Verdun is designed as a mteagrinder. Somme will be an attempt to slow it down. And where would a discussion of Blackadder be without Sir Haig?
-You're correct: the Somme is going to start earlier, and there will be no French component. On the one hand-
hopefully- the battle starting a month or so earlier will mean the German defences are less well-prepared and 19,000 Britons won't be killed with twice that number wounded. On the other, the lack of French forces will limit how much damage the British can do to the Germans.
-The combined Somme/Nivelle Offensives are going to punish the German Army, but not to the extent of OTL 1916, and the year will end with the ruins of Verdun city still in German hands. At the end of the day, Falkenhayn is fine with the Anglo-French attacking with everything they have because it means enemy forces are falling into the meatgrinder at a faster rate than his, and that's a race he knows Germany can win.
There was no mentioning of Romania except as a still neutral country.
Most likely the Russians aren't able to bully them in the Entente by Force.
Because France is getting absolutely pummeled and Austria is standing strong / most likely stronger than OTL i don't believe they will want to intervene on Entente side.
Far more profitable to wait out most of the fighting and join in the eleventh hour when everything is decided.
Romanian plan:
Step 1: Sell to everyone
Step 2: Wait out who is winning
Step 3: Sell the winning side with better conditions
Step 4: Horse trade with everyone
Step 5: If Strategic War situation changes return to Step 2 or 1. Else go to Step 6
Step 6: Declare war on loser and get clay (either Austrian-Hungarian clay or Russian, just get it)
Step 7: Get the admiration of your population.
Excellent analysis. "
Seven Steps to Profitable Neutrality, by King Carol, 1916"
-Though the great ammunition dump explosion (the name of the place escapes me) still happens ITTL, Romania can read which way the war is going by August 1916 and has no reason to abandon the neutrality which has served it so well. Once the Russians start collapsing in 1917, they may swallow their pride and join the Central Powers to pick up Bessarabia. Irridentists would love to go after Transylvania, but sense it wouldn't be wise here.
-Alexander Watson's
Ring of Steel (don't have it on me at the moment, can give a page number if you'd like later on) makes the point that peacetime trade with Romania was actually more lucrative than military occupation. Along with Italy, Romanian resources are going to help ameliorate the effects of the Turnip Winter ITTL.
IMVHO the most probable developement are (in no particular order)
- The Austrian Navy attempt a sortie out of the Adriatic to show the world that she exist and she is relevant as frankly if she let the italians do all the fight...and suceeded her stock will go even lower than normally
- Regia Marina and the Italian Army (the air force was part of the army at the time) will try to bottle whatever force the British have in Malta by increasing the bombing raid and the use of MAS. The objective is to keep them on port so to avoid any enemy raid and to mantain a lifeline between the mainland and the forces in Libya.
- Cadorna Increase the use of the air force to attack the French position to keep the pressure, same for some use of the Navy to give the French army the same treatment the initial italian offensive force received (but this will be more a request and at the moment Adm. Revel is probably one of the three men in Italy that can ignore Cadorna
-The French, cry, menace, beg both the British and the Russian for some offensive so to relieve the pressure over Verdun, so we get ITTL version of the Brusilov offensive and while not succesfull as OTL one will probably create a lot of problem for the A-H army (there is also the possibility that with French on the verge of falling, the Russian brass will decide that an 'all or nothing' approach is the one needed now and so commit even more forces than OTL.
- Romania not considering Wien or Sofia doing an enormous diplomatic blunder will probably remain neutral entering the war the moment some clear winner appear or maybe simply selling at 'friendly rate' in exchange of a secret treaty regarding Bessarabia but honestly the treaty between Italy and the CP will convince them that keep some diplomatic pressure over A-H will give some result
-The Austro-Hungarian Navy is secure in port for now; any such move would come at the eleventh hour after the Italians and Entente have already whittled each other down.
-I want to include a Battle of Malta and/or a British raid on Naples or Taranto as the war winds to a close- that could be the blow which forces Italy to make peace. I agree that keeping the supply lines to Libya open will be a priority, if a challenge. The Central Mediterranean is very tense ITTL, it's the only place where two enemy navies exist side by side without geographic distance separating them, as in the North Sea.
-Cadorna would love more naval bombardments as the Italian army moves on Nice, but di Revel is not going to budge. Surviving the Battle of Cannes was enough of an accomplishment and if he had his way, the Italians would not sortie for the rest of the war.
-We are going to get Somme and Brusilov Offensives ITTL. If anything, the Brusilov Offensive may be even bigger than OTL, with greater Russian and Austro-Hungarian commitments (enabled, in part, by Romanian neutrality). France is certainly going to push her allies even harder than OTL, and the British are going to adopt the idea that the Western Front is the only one which matters far sooner than OTL.
-Exactly right about Romania.
The KuK army's in pretty good shape. No Italian front and Serbia long gone. With good reserves and plenty of artillery and ammo, a brusilov offensive could turn out badly. It was launched on a shoestring, against a front stripped of reserves. The AH should have over 400,000 more soldiers available.
Austria-Hungary has approximately sixty extra divisions, some of which are engaged in farm/factory work at home, but most of which will be available to counter Brusilov's push. Knowing Conrad, once the damage is contained he's going to push back
hard. Attrition warfare across Galicia is going to break the Russian Army the same way the Kerensky Offensive did a year later in OTL. Doubly so if the Russians overcommit to the initial Brusilov Offensive to try and relieve pressure on the French.
You are correct in saying that the RN hasn't got much presence in the Med. The agreement was that France handled the Med. However, the RN is swimming in pre-dreadnoughts that are not needed in the battle against Germany. Those can be assigned to the Med. That will take time, it's true. I'd guess on the order of a month to get the relief force assembled, provisioned and sailed to Malta/Alex
After the Battle of Cannes, the British are going to bump up their Mediterranean fleet considerably, using the older ships. Far from perfect, but better than nothing.
Churchill planned to pull the crews of the old pre-dreadnoughts to man the navy's new ships. That's why he didn't care how many were lost in the dardenalles, Gallipoli.
You are of course correct, but here the Admiralty sees having more ships afloat in the Mediterranean as a bigger priority. Now, I'm not sure how badly undercrewed this will leave the newer ships- or how that will affect Jutland- but there will be ramifications once the High Seas Fleet sorties.
@Kaiser Wilhelm the Tenth , amazing work! Can't wait for the central powers to make more progress! Specially eager to check on blessed karl!
Thank you very much. I do, in fact, have something planned for Karl once he becomes Emperor in November 1916.
Let me complement you on your portrayal of the Battle of Verdun. An outstanding job of portraying just what sort of a hell it was. Chanaris is shown quite well as the sort of decision he had to make, and likely second-guessing himself to his grave.
Thank you very much- I only want to get better. As for Chanaris, he would absolutely second-guess his decision for the rest of his life. What he did that day will define him forever. I tried to strike a balance between his being dishonourable, as in when he shoots his subordinate, but also desperate to save his life and caring for his men.
Yeah, honestly, I would've likely done the same. It's not like I could outlast much longer, reinforcements might not even make it through, and how long before a mutiny?
My personal rule is that if I can't say what I would have done in a situation, I void all right to judge- hence, I want to give him the benefit of the doubt. Not an iron-clad rule by any means but it's served me well thus far.
i'm wondering... how many more deaths compared to OTL has france?
An excellent question, and one which is going to become increasingly relevant as time goes on. Some back of the napkin calculations:
-France had 20 divisions, or 320,000 men, in Verdun by March 1916, out of a total of 100 divisions. Those men are now either dead, wounded, or captured, with a select few moved into new divisions. Call it 300,000 losses by the end of May. That's 3/4 of the total French losses at Verdun in OTL,
before the French have launched a single major counterattack (the push to retake Fort Sartelles notwithstanding).
-In less than one month of fighting during the Nivelle Offensive, the French lost approximately 180,000 men against a German army which they outnumbered 2:1, including British units. Even rounding down the losses to 150,000/month, that's another nine divisions- so the four corps brought up from Italy at the end of chapter 24 won't last two months. Clearly, we are not going to see efforts to retake Verdun last until December ITTL; let's say Nivelle suspends offensive operations (de facto admitting defeat) in late July. That leaves 600,000 French killed and wounded, compared to 400,000 in OTL.
-If we equate the French push at Menton back in chapter eight with Conrad's Asiago offensive, and the Italian offensives at Bardonnechia and Menton with the First Battle of the Isonzo, that's another thirty thousand casualties, not factoring in the forthcoming offensive to actually take Nice.
-In total, we can say the French have suffered approximately 230,000 more casualties than OTL by the end of summer 1916; the equivalent of fourteen divisions gone with no one to replace them, and mutiny starting to wear down the survivors. Not enough to knock France out of the war, but enough to prevent the French Army from doing anything in 1917 except taking punches.
Honestly, thank you for asking this question: it gives me a chance to put my thoughts down, which will help make future chapters more organised.