How's the Start?


  • Total voters
    449
Chapter 44: The Great Dive
  • Chapter 44: The Great Dive

    ***

    “The German Economic Recession of 1921 – 1923 after the Great War was exceedingly fantastic in its proportion that had ever been seen in history. And that was saying something. During the American Revolutionary War, the American government issued continental moneys to finance their war of independence against Great Britain and these moneys only had 1/1000 of their nominal strength and value in practice. The French franc in 1798 was worthy 533 paper cash as well. But in Germany, at the end of the inflation, the value of the German Mark fell to such levels that 1 British Pound was worth 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 German Gold marks, when in 1915, 1 British Pound was worth 2.27 German Marks. This amazing depreciation of the currency robbed the German economy of any practical value. And it was catastrophic in its social, economic and political effects, and would lay the foundation for the German Revanchismus.


    1625228312976.png

    Inflation in Germany

    The government of Chancellor Rosa Luxembourg had become increasingly politically disputed as the SDP and the USPD began to butt heads with one another over policy. The SPD was more moderate and was advocating a social democratic and social capitalism in their economic outlook, and the USPD was more pro-nationalization and pro-social economics. This state of affairs would soon boil over into the Reichstagg, as the government became frozen over the bitter debate about the reparations Germany owed the Entente and the USPD-SPD coalition was slowly starting to fragment before everyone’s eyes.

    The foundation for the inflationary crisis began during the starting of the Great War, with the German government suspending the obligation of the Reichsbank from redeeming its notes in gold, and creating loan offices which could issue paper money as an advance on paper securities and goods, most importantly, the Imperial German government also empowered the German Central Banks to accept treasury bonds and bills as security for new issues of paper money. War loans were issued with supervision and then discounted at banks and loan offices and this made the basis of the future new paper currency of the German government. The increase of treasury bonds in the german government created a renewed amount of large debt in the German markets, and this led to the addition of a publically funded debt of 98 billion dollars in the German economy.


    1625228357509.png

    The British Blockade of Germany

    From between 1915 – 1918, the German economy started to depreciate as an aftereffect of the British blockade, and as because of the less than good economic policies of the German government, however this had taken place only at a slow pace, which did not raise much eyebrows in the German government. The food situation was much more concerning for the Imperial government and subsequent republican government. However in 1919, the inflation situation became much more dangerous when the government began to keep prices at a lower level by various price control regulations to create a stable economy. This created the illusion of a powerful economy in Germany, however in reality the economy was being funded by unsourced debt, which was simply a disaster waiting to happen.

    The German government also printed a lot of money to circulate more money in the market as a measure of price control, however the extra money printed in Germany was unsourced, and unloaded and backed up by nothing, and the circulation of these new cash’s was much less efficient than the German government was willing to admit. By early 1921, however the German stocks of raw material, which was financing the German economy, was starting to become exhausted. Large scale reparation payments could only be made by exporting the country’s manufactured goods, however the country had to purchase raw materials to produce such goods, which only added to the economic strain of the government. The raw materials had to pay in foreign currencies, and this turned the foreign exchange market against the Germans, as the German government lacked effective amounts of foreign currencies. This loss in confidence in the German Mark as a result, led to the depreciation of the Mark in relation to the Pounds, Franc and Dollars. Moreover, leftover stigma from the Great War meant that the British, French and Russian peoples were not eager to have produce that had the label ‘Made in Germany’ on them, and this situation only exacerbated the events that were to follow. Under this already depressing situation of the German Economy, the German government was forced to accept the Versailles Treaty and its terms of economic reparations to the Entente. The French and Russians in particular, having taken the brunt of the German attacks, and having bled white to defend their homelands, were eager to get the reparations and few among them showed any hesitation at the large reparations levied from a country already in depreciation. Luxemburg met with the French Foreign Minister in Luxembourg City in January 7, 1921, and stated bluntly that Germany did not have the means to pay the reparations, as Germany was basically broke at all levels of the economy.

    The French were unrepentant and demanded that the second payment of the reparations in 1921 be conducted in a ‘coordinated and fruitful’ manner, which meant that France would not allow the Germans wiggle their way out of the reparations. Luxemburg reluctantly tried her hand at different economic policies, and began to buy considerable foreign currencies to pay off the reparations, and this only made the depreciation of the Mark even faster. 1 British Pound was already equal to 67 Marks by the starting of Luxemburg’s policy of borrowing foreign currencies.

    On February 1, 1921, the German government paid their second due of the reparations, however now the German government was truly broke, and the economy had nothing to show for the massive amount of Pounds, Francs, Rubles and Dollars that the German government had loaned from banks throughout Europe. When worker riots broke out in the Rhineland after the issue of lowering standards of living in Germany as a result of the economic crisis, the market confidence in the German Mark finally collapsed, and the Mark’s value decreased by 40 fold on the 27th of February, 1921 (1 Pound = 2680 Marks) starting what would become known as the ‘Great Dive’ in the German Economy.


    1625228407574.png

    Chancellor Rosa Luxemburg

    The political debate and power struggle between USPD and SPD only made things worse. Phillip Sheidemann, the Vice-Chancellor had the good of idea trying to partially nationalize the important industries of the country to stave off an economic crisis, however the USPD would not accept anything less than a complete nationalization of the economy at this time of economic depreciation and recession. The leader of the German conservative and right party, Rudolf Heinz also launched several protests against the German government itself, demanding a return to the Monarchy and the Imperial government, which led to the government starting to freeze again. The German government was proving to become increasingly unable to meet the demands of the country. Luxemburg did have good ideas to pursue re-localization and recovery in the German economy, but her own government and President Noske hampered her efforts to work together with the SPD to make the German economy run properly again. Luxemburg was disgusted at the partisan problem that the recession had become and she blamed the USPD for it largely, and she defected from the USPD on the 23rd of March, 1921 and to the SPD, which disrupted the balance of power in the USPD-SPD coalition government. This made several cabinet members of the German government from the USPD party resign from said cabinet in protest and out of the 15 ministries the German government had, only 7 was now functional with ministers at their head. The German government had effectively fallen, and this would only be the starting of the German Great Dive and the German Crisis.” Causes of the Second Great War – The Economy? © 2008 [1]

    ***

    “At the starting of the Great War and the Balkan War, the Ottomans had been taking a very keen interest in their navy, by and large, and had in the past few years managed to gain a larger collection of warships which were used in the Balkan wars to some effect. However by 1921, the Ottoman Navy had become small again, and was now falling behind other middle powered Great Powers in the Great Game that was Great Power politics and geopolitics. At the starting of the year 1921, the Ottoman navy consisted of the following ships:-


    Dreadnoughts (2):
    Yavuz Selim, Sultan Osmaniye (All Orion Class Dreadnoughts)
    Battleships (2):
    Barbaros Heyreddin, Turgut Reis (All German Made)
    Light Cruisers (7):
    Zafer, Kosova, Fethiye, Sadiye, Hamidiye, Mediciye, Bert-i-Satvet (4 Town Class Cruisers, 3 Miscellaneous)
    Submarines (6)
    U-1, U-2, U-3, U-5, U-7, U-10 (U-43 Austrohungarian Class Submarines)
    Destroyers (16):
    Samsun, Yarhisar, Tasoz, Basra, Sinop, Izmir, Bursa, Erdine, Peyk-I-Sevket, Mehmed II, Umar II, Mansure, Lubnan, Zuhai, Fettah, Mahmud II

    The situation of the navy was considerably better than in 1911, in both equipment, training and size, as the navy was still quite modern, however, it was small. In comparison to the heavy hitter warships, the Ottomans had around ~70 gunboats and 10 minesweepers and minelayers as well. However, the Ottomans knew that they were lagging behind on other powers. The Russians were growing wary of the growing economic resurgence of the Ottoman Empire, and had started a rather large naval buildup in the Black Sea, and the Italians had ordered the creation of the first 6-6 Fleet program in the Red Fleet, which was now threatening the Ottomans from two sides. If the Ottomans ever found themselves at war with the Russians and Italians, the Ottomans were quite aware of the fact that they would be caught off-guard from a two-pronged naval attack in the Black Sea by the Russians and in the Mediterranean by the Italian Red Fleet. The Ottomans had managed to increase their economic influence and economic power, and the naval budget could be increased, though to a limit.

    The two battlecruisers of the Suleiman Class were nearly finished and would replace the Barbaros Heyreddin and Turgut Reis by 1923, however other than that the Ottoman Navy had made no other expansionary or replacement moves, which was quite worrying for the Minister of Naval Affairs, Ciballi Mehmed Bey. Now old, and down for retirement by the end of the year, the Bey wanted to make sure that a last proper expansion of the navy happened under his reign as Minister of Naval Affairs. The Ottoman Grand Vizier, Ahmet Riza was much more busy with other matters of the state, and the Ottoman naval minister knew that he would have to gain the aid of another to gain the attention of the Grand Vizier. Admiral Sir Arthur Limpus, was the head of the British Naval Mission in the Ottoman Empire in 1921, and he was just the man that the Bey was looking for.

    The Bey approached the British Admiral, and asked the man about the prices of the British ships that were being constructed in British seaports and dockyards. The Admiral, always eager to have British ships exported as a part of the British scheme to improve their economy after the Great War was intrigued by the questioning that was coming his way from the Ottoman Naval Minister. He broached the topic, and answered by telling the Bey that the British made Danae Class Light Cruisers were currently being listed as open to export. The naval minister hurried back to the government and tried to convince Riza that this was the opening that they needed. Riza was not so convinced, and pointed out that the current expansion and reformation of the military under the military education scheme was much more important than the navy. However, at this point, Mahmud Shevket Pasha, who was also listed for retirement by the end of the war, was also alarmed by the Ottoman lag in the navy, and agreed with his counterpart, and endorsed an expansion of the navy and increase in the naval budget. He also showed a lot of interest in the British built ‘Aircraft Carriers’ however that was a long way out of Ottoman naval capability for a good amount of time.


    1625228567447.png

    Blueprints of the Kaysar Class Battleships.

    Ottoman naval engineers had been trying to come up with a new design for the vast majority of the past years, and on the 16th of February, 1921, gave the Ottoman Ministry of Naval Affairs with their blue print on, what they called as the Kaysar (Caesar) class Battleships. This battleship plan was on paper a 37,000 tonnes battleship. This was a postwar project that had radical hull improvement over previous battleships, with only a 50 mm deck armor and a less amount of anti-aircraft guns. The belt armored was 270 mm and around 300 mm on the turret faces. This battleship was also to carry sixteen 380 mm guns in four quad turrets and superfiring, which was a radical upgrade to the Barbaros Heyreddin. The guns of the Kaysar class were also equipped with an improved reloading system of 2 rounds per minute and a muzzle velocity of 820 meters per second with armor piercing shells. The secondary artillery was not in the typical barbettes, but in turrets, and in all sixteen, and of the 170 mm guns (7 inch) secondary armaments. Configuration of the eight twin turrets plus the 24 dual purpose rapid fire 102 mm guns, completed by many 40 mm Anti-Aircraft guns were to be the armament complement of the battleship. The ship, also had a noticeable lack of armor, to create more mobility and more firepower. This was a calculated move, as the naval battles of the Great War between the Royal Navy and the Imperial German Navy showed that speed was going to be a battle winner. Unknown to Ottoman naval engineers at the time, however shell dispersion would a consistent problem for the Kaysar Class. Nonetheless, this plan received the greenlight of the Ottoman government and 2 were ordered by the Ministry of Naval Affairs. Their shapes were laid down in Imperial Dockyards in Smyrna on the 29th of March, 1921. [2]

    With the issue of the heavy battleships done, the lighter warships were to be spread through a period of 5 years to minimize cost. In doing so the Ottoman government knew that they would be able to reduce warship costs. For their destroyers, the Ottomans looked at the country of Greece, which was sporting American destroyers, and using them rather easily, and turned the American government as well. The Americans had since 1890 been constructing small gunboats and minelayers for the Ottoman Navy, but the Ottomans had never gone to the American government with an order of a real warship. The Americans were more favorable to loans to buy warships and armament and on the basis of periodical payment, the Ottomans negotiated the purchase of 8 Clemson Class destroyers from the American government. The Americans started to lay down the foundations for the destroyers, and payment for all of them was due to be paid by 1926, though the Ottomans began to pay in installment as early as March, 1921.

    Similar to the Kaysar Class, the Ottomans were eager for their own indigenous submarines, as they had seen the havoc that the Germans had conducted against British shipping in the Great War with their powerful indigenous submarine industry. Ottoman Naval engineer, and prominent Ottoman engineer in general Georgios Stefanos unveiled his plan for the Derinokyanus Class Submarines (literally Deep Sea in Turkish). This submarine class was largely based on the French O’Byrne Class Submarines, and shared many characteristics with it. The submarine was to have a displacement of 342 surface tonnes, 52.4 meters long, with a beam and draught that was 4.7 meters and 2.7 meters long respectively. With an engine containing two shafts, the submarine would have a theoretical speed of 14 knots, and a range of 1,850 nautical range. Its armament consisted of four 450 mm torpedo tubes and one 47 mm deck gun. [3] More importantly for the Ottomans, this submarine was going to be cheap, and many other powers began to look into it with interest. On the 31st of March, 1921, when the Ottoman government agreed to construct 6 Derinokyanus Class submarines, the Spanish government approached the Ottomans with the possibility of building 4 submarines of the same class for the Spanish navy. Negotiations would start the next day.


    1625228635273.png

    The French O'Bryne Submarines, which inspired the aforementioned Ottoman Submarines.

    Finally, the Ottomans contacted the British Embassy and started to negotiate with it for 3 Danae Class Light Cruisers. Unlike the Americans, the British were more uptight about installment payment, however they agreed to a time period of 2 years for the total payment of the three ships.

    This naval expansion program which was named the 1921 Naval Plan was a plan that was expensive, and rather costly, and overshot the naval budget by a good amount, however thankfully the Ottomans managed to cover money for it through small loans from dispersed banks. It would lay the foundation for the Ottoman Navy during the Second Great War.” The Ottoman Navy: A Prestigious and Bumpy History © 2016

    ***

    “On the 21st of January 1921, the head of states of Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Costa Rica signed on the Treaty of San Jose, with one another, recognizing the project of the ‘Federal Republic of Central America’. The previous two attempts to create a unified Central America had failed, horribly, with the first attempt ending in civil war and the separation of the countries, and the second attempt falling apart in 2 years. However this time, the governments of the respective countries were eager to make things work the third time around. Third Times the Charm was something that many subscribed to it seems.


    1625228674216.png

    President Emiliano Chamorro Vargas of Nicaragua

    President Emiliano Chamorro Vargas of Nicaragua did join the presidents to sign the treaty in San Jose, however he had no support from the Nicaraguan National Assembly, which was dominated by the radical traditionalist faction of the Conservative Party of Nicaragua. The Liberal Party, which controlled a third of the National Assembly supported the federal project, however due to the vagueness of the Treaty, even they were suspicious of the third Central American project. Nonetheless, the Liberals, led by Jose Esteban Gonzalez informed Vargas, that if the federal project kept the autonomy of Nicaragua as a sovereign right, then they would support of the project. Vargas himself was in support of such a project, partially due to his oligarchic origins, which would benefit from expanding their family business into the other Central American countries. Vargas was at the least able to convince the National Assembly to allow him to go to the Convention of San Salvador, where the countries involved were going to iron out of the federal project.

    President Jorge Melendez of El Salvador officially extended the invitations to all of the head of states involved to come to the capital of El Salvador on the 25th of March, 1921 to iron out what would become the federal process of the Central American Republic. President Emilio Vargas of Nicaragua accepted extremely fast, and the President of Costa Rica, Julio Acosta Garcia accepted pretty quickly as well. Carlos Herrera, President of Guatemala was slightly suspicious of the quick succession to the Treaty of San Jose, however he too agreed to come in good order. Rafael Lopez Gutierrez, the fiercest proponent of the Central American Dream among the five countries accepted the offer easily as well. As five presidents were involved in the decision making process, the security of the capital of El Salvador on the days of the convention was fierce, and the country’s military was deployed to make sure none of the usual banana republic shenanigans happened during the convention.


    1625228750212.png

    The Central American Republic of 1821-46 was what the Convention hoped to restore minus Panama.

    The San Salvador Convention which took place from the 25th of March to the 29th of March, 1921, was a heated affair, as the five presidents argued for differing degrees of autonomy from a centralized unitary state all the way to a loose union of nations. The convention almost ended on the 27th when President Herrerra of Guatemala threatened to withdraw from the project in anger about his proposals being shot down, however cooler heads, plus the French, British, American and Mexican delegations present in the convention intervening to make the head of states look at the state of matters with more cooler heads allowed the convention to go on ahead. By the end of the convention, a good amount of things were agreed upon. The basic of these agreements were:-

    • The creation of a ‘Federal Republic of Central America’.
    • The Federal Union to consist of the Republic of Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica and Nicaragua
    • The Federal System of the Union would be based on the recognition of the sovereign autonomy of all the nations involved in the project.
    • The union to have a unicameral legislature called the Federal Diet, which would be elected by the people.
    • The country to be a semi-presidential parliamentary federal republic.
    • The federal diet to have powers based on the concepts of public debt and property, trade/commercial regulation, unemployment insurance, direct/indirect taxation, postal service, census/statistics, defense, navigation and shipping, quarantine in times of pandemic, sea coast and inland fisheries, ferries, currency/coinage, banking and paper money, weights and measures, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, citizenship, marriage and divorce, criminal law and procedure, penitentiaries, and federal projects connecting boundaries of every Nation State within the Federal Union with one another.
    • The legislatures of the Nation States within the Federal Union to have powers over direct taxation in the state, management of the public lands, prisons, hospitals, municipalities, formalization of marriage, property and civil rights, administration of civil justice, education, company rights, natural resources, matters of local nature, and the right to secede from the union if 4/5 of the legislature vote in favor of it after a subnational referendum in favor of it.
    • Issues such immigration/emigration, and national food produce and agriculture to be issues that will be under the concurrent authority of the Federal Diet and the Subnational Legislatures.
    • The position of President of Central America to be created, whilst being separate from the positions of Presidents of the subnational nations, which would be retained.
    It was much more comprehensive that what most were expecting of it, and the respective governments of the would-be union were all happy with the amount of power that had been divided between the federal legislature and their own legislatures. All of the presidents returned to their home nations to discuss the potential of the union, and have their legislatures ratify it. While actual union would still be quite a ways away (on the 15th of September, 1923), the basis for the union was now sound and work towards federation began in all of the five countries involved.” The Central American Dream © 2020

    ***

    “The Constitutional Acts of China 1920 revived the National Assembly of China which was suspended by Yuan Shikhai in 1916, and the Hongxian Emperor, Yuan Keding, was more willing than his father to ascertain his rule under at least a semi-democratic government. The Constitutional Acts divided power between the Prime Minister, Emperor and the National Assembly which each player receiving 1/3 of the total executive power. As a result, the Hongxian Emperor opened the first National Assembly (largely consisting of independents) on the 17th of October, 1920 declaring that a general election for the 168 seat Senate and 406 Seat House of Representatives would take place the next year. The electoral system of the elections had their seats broken down into electoral districts designed for each county and equivalent of China. Women had received partial voting rights in the election as well, with Women with high incomes allowed to vote according to the new constitution of China.


    1625228795789.png

    The Hongxian Emperor

    There was also the matter that Lou Tseng-Tsiang, the Prime Minister of the Hongxian Emperor was becoming increasingly unpopular among the Chinese populace due to his Roman Catholicism faith. Under the Chinese Empire, China was undergoing a renaissance of Chinese culture, and that included traditional Chinese folk religions, Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism. Christians in China were generally looked down upon, with the memory of the Taiping Rebellion still fresh in the minds of many.

    As the date of the election was announced, the major political groups of the Empire began to coalesces with one another to establish proper political parties. The strongest of these political ‘pressure groups’ which had been legal before the 1920 Constitution was the Communications Clique. The Clique was a powerful interest group consisting of politicians, bureaucrats, technocrats, businessmen, engineers and labour unionists. It was a centrist political group that was succeeded by the Chinese Union and Communications Party (CUCP). CUCP elected Tang Shaoyi, the former Minister of Mail and Communications of the Imperial Cabinet under the Qing as their leader. He was a moderate and charismatic leader, and was a very vocal pro-democracy and pro-constitutional monarchism politician in China. The CUCP based its foundations on basic technocratic ideals based in centrism.


    1625228820218.png

    Liang Qichao

    In 1916, the Chinese Progressive Party was dissolved by imperial decree of Yuan Shikhai. As highlighted before this, only political pressure groups, and not parties were allowed before the 1920 Constitution. The party was succeeded by the Research Clique, led by Liang Qichao as its leader. The Research Clique was instrumental in pushing the Chinese into the Great War against the Germans, and the clique had the ear of the Hongxian Emperor. Many constitutional monarchists from Su Yat-Sen’s Constitutional Protection Movement also defected over to the clique after the successive end of the Great War, which allowed the clique to gain some modicum of power. After the constitution of 1920, the Clique was dissolved and the Progressive Party was reinstated once again. Liang Qichao continued to lead the party, and based the party’s foundation in solid liberal conservatism.

    Considering outright republican parties and outright communist/socialist parties in China were banned during this time, the leftwing coalition of politicians in China grouped together into one loose union called the China Democratic Socialist Party, which was led by Carsun Chang. Chang, a Shanghai native by birth, was also a labour unionist, and he retained ambivalent tones to the monarchy in his political outlook to not gain the ire of the Imperial government. Its inspiration was the Social Democratic Parties of Scandinavia and advocated for market capitalism and greater social reforms in China, though it remained supportive of the Imperial government to avoid arrests.

    The Chinese Youth Party founded by Li Huang, a philosopher and lawyer by trade, was the typical right wing party of the country that was focused on Chinese nationalism. It consisted of several former veterans as well, and made the remaining concessions in China a focal part of their policy whilst remaining fiscally conservative in their economic outlook. Majority of the Kuomintang refused to take part in the election due to their republican outlook, but many pro-constitutional monarchical members of the party, led by Chen Qimei took part in the elections under the name of Kuomintang (Pro-Government). Sun Yat-Sen would denounce the members of his party taking part in the election, casting them out of the party from his headquarters in the British Concession in Shanghai, however the Imperial Government would continue to recognize the Chen faction of the Kuomintang as the legitimate faction of the party.


    chineselection wikibox.png

    During the elections, the CUCP managed to gain the largest share of the vote and seats, however remained far away from an actual majority. However Laing Qichao agreed to give the CUCP Confidence and Supply with his own Progressive Party, which allowed the CUCP to form a minority government in the National Assembly. In the resulting contingent elections, Tang Shaoyi, became the first partisan Prime Minister of the Restored Imperial Chinese state.” Chinese Electoral History © ImpChinaGov.net

    ***
    ---

    [1] – Economic information from The German Hyperinflation and the Demand for Money Revisited by P. Michael

    [2] – Kaysar ship based on the Progetto G Class Battleship of Italy otl that was not made.

    [3] – based on characteristics of the French O’Byrne Class Submarines otl.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 45: The Great 20s: Riza’s Greatest Legacy
  • Chapter 45: The Great 20s: Riza’s Greatest Legacy

    ***

    “One of the greatest legacies that Ahmet Riza would lay down in Ottoman history would be that he and his cabinet would create the foundation for the modern Ottoman Economy. Of course, Ali Kemal also deserves credit due to his early reforms in 1912 and 1913, however, it is arguably Riza, and the two strongest men in his cabinet, Mehmed Celal Bey, the Minister of Agriculture, and Avraam Benaroya, the Minister of Economic, Financial and Industrial Affairs, who led to the economic boom that was the 1920s and 30s in the Ottoman Empire. The effects of what they conducted were long term in vision rather than short term, which led to their ousting in the 1922 General Elections, however after these economic aspects manifested themselves, it was obvious who was to be credited with the new developments.


    1625375763489.png

    Grand Vizier Ahmet Riza, the man credited with the Ottoman Economic Resurgence

    Land Reform in the Ottoman Empire had been a long growing process ever since 1915, however on the 3rd of April, 1921, the Ottoman Minister of Agriculture, Mehmed Celal Bey began to plan 3rd Agricultural Reform Act within the Ottoman Empire. The Ottomans had once been the largest exporter of agricultural goods throughout the European continent, but from 1867 – 1896, the Ottoman Empire entered a period of precipitous decline in trade and exports in agricultural goods, and this was mainly due to the United States of America. In 1865, 91% of Ottoman exports in the agricultural sector was the basic crop of wheat. Whilst the Ottomans lagged behind in modern agrarian technology and topics, the Americans increased their export of wheat from 1867 to 1896 by 3500%, which weakened other wheat exporting powers, such as the Ottoman Empire on the global economy.

    The Ottoman Empire, in comparison to heavyweights like Austria-Hungary, Russia, Great Britain, and even France was a small country to trade with, and the vast colonial empires that these countries acquired in the latter half of the 19th century only made the trading volume of the Ottoman Empire even worse in comparison. After 1867, the only economic sector that the Ottomans had a large world share in was the export of tobacco. In 1910, the Ottomans constituted 11% of the world’s share of tobacco exports. Whilst this number had grown in lieu of Ottoman Economic Reforms from 11% to 13.7% in the past decade by 1921, this sector of the agrarian economy had been left unwisely unnoticed. The Ottoman Empire was also still a heavily agrarian country, with 59% of the population engaged in agriculture as their day to day means of economic activity. The past land reform acts had been largely successful in Anatolia, Libya and the Ottoman Balkans, and agricultural yields between 1911 – 1921 grew by 61% in the Ottoman Empire, and starting from 1918 the empire had greatly diversified its agricultural produce as well, with not only wheat, but grain, barley, fruits, rice etc being produced in heavy numbers as well. However in Ottoman Arabia, the agrarian economy wasn’t affected by a lot by these reforms and continued to stagnate a good bit.


    1625375812262.png

    Ottoman Tobacco

    This was largely due to oligarchic problems. Throughout the 1800s, local oligarchic families had arisen as brokers between the central government and the local vilayets/millets in the Ottoman Empire. And these families were powerful in Arabia, as these families were always linked with tribal structures, and the Ottomans were careful about not upsetting the tribes in the Empire to make sure that their loyalty was not in question. But now, the Ottomans had an opening that they could take. As a consequence of the Yemenite Affair that saw Sultan Mehmed VI killed, the empire had begun to look down upon tribal structures, and if the Ottoman government could act against these tribes in a subtle manner, then they would be able to dismantle the entirety of the oligarchic system in Ottoman Arabia. Starting with the Tribal Reformation Act of 1921, signed on the 19th of April, 1921, the autonomy of the tribes were put under heavy scrutiny of the central government, which allowed the government to arrest several oligarchs on trumped up charges to get them away from the path to economic reformation. Several thousands of square miles of territories were seized by the Ottoman Government which was owned by these oligarchs and their cronies. These territories were then distributed by the Empire to the peasants of the empire at lowered prices with low interest loans to further the agricultural land reform in the Ottoman Empire. More importantly, the Ottomans also recognized the large share of the tobacco industry that they owned in the global market, and began to stem the supply of tobacco to the international market. This raised many eyebrows, as this meant a temporary loss of small amounts of revenue, however this trick on part of the Ottoman Minister of Agriculture was cunning. When there is less supply, demand goes up, that is the most basic of economic theories, and this was used by the Ottoman Ministry of Agriculture to increase global demand of Ottoman Tobacco. Several tobacco firms throughout North America and Europe were filled with demands for extra sources of Ottoman Tobacco and these firms in return complained to the Ottomans about the lack of produce and supply from the Empire. The Empire made convincing arguments about shortfalls in produce due to torrential rains, however this extra demand managed to successfully, as the Ottomans hoped, to incentivize the tobacco industry in the empire, and in the 3 months that the Ottomans stemmed the tobacco firms in the empire, 380 new tobacco firms in the empire cropped up alongside 47 new large tobacco farms.

    In particular, the Ottoman Empire was all the more eager to expand its raw resources which were being exported as well. In particular, having access to the Macedonian, Albanian and Anatolian Gem Mines, the Ottoman Empire was a literal fountain of gems and crystals which was being criminally under-exported by the Empire. Well this was to be no more. The Ottomans had limited export of crystals and gems largely because of the fact that the empire had limited private gem mines, and out of the 13 mines active in the empire, 11 were governmental owned. This meant that competition within the Ottoman Economy regarding gems was just non-existent. The Ottomans began to withdraw from their policy of nationalization within the gem industry and on the 15th of April, began to sell 7 Gem Mines on the basis of voucher privatization. This led to several big mining firms in the Ottoman Empire buying up these mines, which only increased competition between said firms, which was a huge plus point in the Empire’s economy. Restrictions on opening private mining firms in the gems sector was slowly restricted by the Empire, though they continued to be regulated.


    1625375856532.png

    Gems from a Crystal Cave in Albania

    The Great Railway Plan was also quite an interesting part of Ottoman Economic Development, as greater connectivity meant that the Ottomans were now on the course of having a lot of untapped manpower that was going to be soon, for a lack of proper words, tapped. In light of this, the Ottomans began to run into the problem of their manpower resources. The Ottoman Census System had a huge problem in it. Only males and landed women were counted in the census records, which meant that the Ottomans were artificially lowering their population records. The Ottoman Census of 1919 marks 24 million people throughout the Empire wherein the 1920 Local Census Reports, which counted everyone throughout the Empire’s Vilayet’s counted as many as 31 – 34 million. This meant that human capital in the Ottoman Empire was being ill-used as well. On the 27th of May, 1921, the Census Reform Act rectified this mistake that was glaring through the Ottoman Population Office, and granted recognition to the fact that there were 32,237,988 people in the Ottoman Empire in 1921, recognizing all of the people that the previously flawed national census system that the Ottomans had used. [1]

    All of these activities in the Ottoman Economy was bound to have an effect on the export and import trading relation of the Empire. Since 1913, the Ottomans had managed to run a green light on the trading balance, however until 1915, this had been a small profit and since 1915, a moderate balance of trade. But the Ottomans needed, and wanted to make this a larger avenue of gaining more revenue to the state.


    YearsExports (In current price millions $)Imports (In Current Price millions $)
    1839 – 545.35.5
    1859 - 7354.9
    1873 – 961.20.6
    1896 – 19074.36
    1907 - 19134.85
    1913 - 19155.85.4
    1915 – 19216.255.3
    Ottoman Exports and Imports Ratio
    From Ottoman Economic Archives @ Ottoman Imperial Government Archives 1900 – 1925

    The expansion of Ottoman Ports was instrumental in expanding the export structure of the Ottoman Empire as well. The most important ports of the Ottoman Empire by 1921 was Constantinople, Smyrna, Salonika, Tripoli, Basra and Beirut and all of these ports were bringing in large swathes of income. In particular, Salonika had grown by a massive amount, with revenues totaling 6.7 million pounds in 1921 [Ottoman Imperial Archives – Salonika Vilayet 1900 – 1925]. [2] Adding to Salonika, the expansion of the Ottoman Economy meant that Basra had exploded as a trading port as well, and was seeing increased investiture as well. In particular, this meant that the Ottomans got the reprieve that they needed to increase the GDP per Capita of the Empire as well. In 1913, the Kingdom of Spain had a higher GDP Per Capita than the Ottoman Empire ($2,036 in today’s prices), and the Ottomans had a total GDP Per Capita at the same time as ~$1,000 - ~$1,200 in today’s prices. By 1921, the two countries now enjoyed an equal level of Per Capita Income (~$2189 in today’s prices), which was a success in the eyes of the Ottoman Empire, and rightfully so.

    1625375927392.png

    Ottoman Salonika in a Greek Postcard

    The Cabinet of the Wondermen, as the Ottomans called Riza’s government and cabinet, was also acutely aware of the labour component of economical development, and the growing labour class meant that the Ottomans would have to answer them. Considering one of the two parties in the coalition government was the Ottoman Socialist Party, they had to pass several worker reforms in the Empire, with a 9 hour limit on working in industries, and several worker reforms throughout the Empire, also aided the government in winning the loyalty of the working class. In particular this table from Ottoman archives can just show how much of an improvement the Ottomans had in labour growth:-

    YearTotal Population (in millions)Total Labour Population in MillionsInvolved in Industrial Sector by %
    190019 million0.2 million4%
    190520 million0.3 million4.7%
    191021 million0.45 million5.28%
    191323 million0.72 million6.9%
    191525.7 million0.98 million9.1%
    191828.1 million1.28 million11.3%
    192132 million1.63 million14.8%
    Ottoman Labour/Workers and Involvement in the Industrial Sector
    [Ottoman Imperial Archives 1900 – 1925]

    The development was phenomenal, however even then, the Ottomans had clearly not been able to properly resource their working population into the industrial and manufacturing sector, as virtually 40% of the worker population was involved in the service sector and not the industrial sector. The Ottomans needed to make their industrial base stronger, and whilst financing the construction of industrial estates was largely easy by comparison, the finding manpower to fill these factories was much much more harder. The Economic Sectorial Plan of 1921 passed on the 21st of June, 1921 outlined basic plans for the Ottoman Empire to reach a state of the economy wherein 35% of the working population would be involved in manufacturing, another 35% in the service sector and the rest 30% in agriculture by 1945. This was a radical plan, however was needed if the Empire was ever to utilize its economic potential to its full capability.

    The debt was also a huge issue in the Ottoman Economy. In 1912, the standing debt of the Ottoman Government was 112 million pounds, and by 1921, nine years later, the Ottomans had reduced their debt to 48 million pounds. This was largely paid off by the Ottomans using the Italian War Reparations, the Bulgarian, Serbian and Montenegrin War Reparations as well as the manufacturing that the Ottomans seized in Bulgarian Thrace and Serbian Leskovac. The Ottomans were now arguing that the 1881 agreement that the Ottomans would maintain a 5% tariff free payment to the Ottoman Public Debt Administration was now void, because the Ottomans had reduced their debt below 50 million, and was now firmly in the medium high debt range, and had no need for the OPDA. This was concerning for many of the European Powers, however, the United Kingdom led by Austen Chamberlain became the first Great Power to withdraw their OPDA representation, stating that the Ottoman Empire had paid off their outstanding debts with London. This was true, however, the reason why the British withdrew first is much more nuanced.


    1625375998193.png

    British sector of the Ottoman Public Debt Administration

    After the Great War had ended, tensions between Britain and Russia had grown by a huge pace. The Russian economy was growing at a tremendous rate, and the British were quite afraid of this. Already being backed into a corner by the growth of the American Economy, the British were not happy with the growth of the Russian Economy. Whilst the Triple Entente and the Anglo-Russian Entente remained in force on paper, by 1921, the de-facto situation was that Russia and Britain were not allied with one another anymore. Russian projects in Central Asia and the British meddling in the Afghan Crisis had raised tensions to a height that had not been seen since the end of the Great Game. With the resurgence of the Ottomans as a healing power, Chamberlain and the British government rightly recognized that having the Ottomans as a friendly and allied power would be extremely beneficial for them against any Russian incursion into South Asia. And with the Ottomans paying off all outstanding debts they owed to the British, there was no real reason to stay anymore either. As a result, partially due to pragmatism and partially due to the need to create a British friendly Ottoman Empire, the British became the first power to recognize the annulment of the OPDA for the British delegation on the 19th of May, 1921. The Netherlands and Danubia soon followed and closed their representational assemblies in the OPDA. Only Italy, France and Germany retained their representation in the OPDA, largely due to the fact that France was still in negotiation with the Ottoman Empire with the final payments of the debts, and because Italy was still trying to separate sovereign and private debt owed by the Ottomans to Italy. As a command economy after the Italian Revolution, that was an important factor in Italian Economics. The Germans hanged on desperate to use the Ottomans as a way to stave off the current German Mark Crisis as well, though they got nowhere in that regard.

    All in all, the OPDA nearly ceased to exist, and the Ottomans managed to renege on their 1881 promise which was contingent on the OPDA to lower tariffs to specific countries. As a part of the protectionist policies that the Empire was following to grow their own economic base, this was vital, and the tariffs that were raised after the British, Dutch and Danubians withdrew meant that the companies of these countries operating in the Ottoman Empire faced more stiff resistance from indigenous firms and companies, which led to more competition, which led to a more productive credit economy in the Ottoman Empire as a result.

    Finally, the Petroleum Industry was an industry that both the Ottoman Government, and foreign governments knew was going to be a lucrative part of the Empire’s burgeoning economy. Several Oil Industrialists and Enthusiasts as well engineers, having studied in British and French universities, and the Empire began laying down 12 inch pipelines in the Kirkuk Oil fields. The Ottoman Office of Oil and Petroleum Resources which was established in 1920 estimated that the pipelines would be completed by 1928, which would allow the Ottomans to pump out several thousand barrels of oil, which would allow the Ottomans to save a huge amount of money that was being spent to buy oil from Khuzestan, the UK and Russia. Several Ottoman survey companies in Syria also noted that the Deir Ez-Zor region of Syria had a lot of oil wells popping up every now and then, which meant that eastern Syria was rich in oil resources. At this point, when French, Russian, Danubian, American and British companies showed interest, the Ottomans had to put their feet down. If there was one thing that Sultan Abdulhamid II had done well in his reign, he had refused to grant any concession to the western powers in the prospective oil fields of the Ottoman Empire, and had went along a balance policy of investment which allowed the Ottomans to remain on top with oil investments. With the exception of the Anglo-Ottoman Mesopotamian Oil Company, all other oil wells were now exclusively the right of the Ottoman Government, which meant that no other power had any right in them other than investments and nothing else. This policy was instituted by Riza on the 30th of June, 1921.


    1625376034087.png

    Oil found in Ottoman Syria

    All of these radical reforms were amalgamated into what is known today as the ‘Great 3 Month Processes’ by Ottoman Historians. Their effects weren’t seen by Riza when he was in office, but by the time his successor came into office as Grand Vizier, the Empire would be facing a radical growth of the economy that had never been quite seen before in the Ottoman Empire. In essentiality, it repeated the massive growth that the American Economy had from 1870 – 1910, and the massive growth the British economy underwent from 1790 – 1830 under modern conditions. Though the Ottomans would never reach an economic position as dominant as the two aforementioned powers, the vast resources of the Empire of Osman made it sure that the economy of the empire continued to strengthen and become more modern and powerful as time went on. These reforms would also lay the basis for the Ottoman Wartime Economy during the Second Great War.” Resurgence of the Ottoman Economy 1911 – 1977; University of Chicago by John Maxwell © 2010.

    ***

    “The defection of Chancellor Rosa Luxemburg from the USPD to the SPD created a governmental crisis in Germany. This upset the balance of power in the USPD-SPD coalition and both the Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor was now a member of the SPD Party. The new leader of the USPD, Wilhelm Peck lambasted this move, and the USPD began to boycott the coalition and the legislature itself, unwilling to come to an agreement that would preserve governmental and political stability in the country. Luxemburg, despite her defection was anxious to maintain political stability, and maybe it is theorized that she had come to regret her defection due to the political problems that arose as a result of it. She negotiated with Phillip Scheidemann, and managed to convince the wily old social democrat that he should resign from his position as Vice Chancellor, whilst a member of the USPD would come and take up his position. Scheidemann was promised a position in the cabinet if he did this. In the end, Scheidemann did tender his resignation as Vice-Chancellor, however he did this prematurely and negotiations with the USPD was going absolutely nowhere. And this meant that the country now had no vice-Chancellor and a Chancellor whose position was rocky as a dingy boat in a storm in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, that is to say, not secure at all.

    More importantly all of this was having an adverse effect on the economy, which was already straining in the economic recession which was the German Great Dive. The German government was still locked in heated combat with one another, the Far Right in Germany, led by Rudolf Heinze was all the more willing to capitalize on the situation and used it to further their own agenda, using popular populist, and anti-establishment slogans to rally the people into protests and marches. Unless the political situation was amended soon, Luxemburg knew that the country would fall into heavy crisis. The workers in the Rhineland were already becoming angry and the Red Worker’s Army, a pro-communist terrorist force had been wreaking havoc in the Rhineland area, and destroying several important industrial sectors, which only aided in the recession of the German Mark, unable to back its strength with manufactured goods.


    1625376068773.png

    Johannes Giesberts, a man critical in solving the issue of the fallen government.

    Johannes Giesberts, a member of the Centre/Zentrum Party tried to mediate matters, and brought the state of affairs to the recognition of the FDP and Zentrum party as well. All of these parties soon temporarily gave up their partisan agenda, and began to aid the central government by providing confidence and supply, and the Zentrum Party at least, provided a significant block in the Reichstagg, aiding the position of the SPD. When Wilhelm Peck finally rejected new negotiations with Rosa Luxemburg, the Chancellor turned to the Zentrum Party instead, and the two parties agreed to enter a confidence and supply coalition with one another. Luxemburg dissolved the cabinet, and with the backing of the independents, FDP, Zentrum and SPD formed a new cabinet consisting of the following members on the 23rd of May, 1921:-

    • Chancellor of the German Reich: Rosa Luxemburg (SPD)
    • Vice-Chancellor of the German Reich: Adolf Grober (Zentrum)
    • Minister of the Interior: Erich Koch-Weser (FDP)
    • Minister of Finance: Joseph Wirth (Zentrum)
    • Minister of Foreign Affairs: Philipp Scheidemann (SDP)
    • Minister of Economic Affairs: Robert Schimdt (SDP)
    • Minister for Labour & Postal Affairs: Johannes Giesberts (Zentrum)
    • Minister of Justice: Alexander Schlicke (SDP)
    • Minister of Defense: Otto Gessler (FDP)
    • Minister of Transport: Gustav Bauer (SPD)
    • Minister of Food: Andreas Hermes (Ind)
    • Minister Without Portfolio: Eduard David (SPD)
    In all of this political and economic upheaval, we can find the foundation and basis for the future German Dictatorship Era, which would lead to the Second Great War. Gregor and Otto Strasser were Bavarians born in Upper Bavaria. These two brothers joined the Imperial Germany Army and became lauded infantry battalion commanders, with both of them receiving the Iron Cross for their bravery. Especially during the Battle of Strasbourg, both brothers had distinguished themselves. However after the fall of Imperial Germany and the rise of an Independent Bavaria, the two brothers had rejected their Bavarian identity and remained German citizens and identifying with Germany. And no one was more angry about the humiliations Germany was being forced to contend with other than these two brothers themselves.

    The new Serbian Ideology of Quantum Fasianism was closely linked with ultra-nationalism and far right behavior, as well as irredentism. The two brothers were extremely influenced by Serbian radicalism, and began to lay down the foundation for the ideology that would one day become known infamously to all of us as Gildeism. Both brothers originally anti-Semitic in nature, had both backtracked on their positions after the end of the Great War, and they began to focus on the Austrians, who they saw as the Stabbers in the Night against Greater Germany.

    During the Great Dive, on the 30th of June, 1921, the Strasser Brothers would jointly write the book known as Das Konsortium which highlighted the economic failings of the central government, and that a nationalistic populist anti-establishment dictatorship was the way to go forward. The two brothers had become increasingly ethnonationalistic, and turned to the old idea of Lebensraum which was coined by biologist Oscar Peschel in the 1860s. The brothers stated that it was the natural right and destiny of the German peoples to dominate Europe, and that the Aryan Germans were the highest race in the world. In contrast to the earlier anti-Semitic positions of two brothers, the two praised the Jews of Germany with one paragraph going even further to state, ‘It is hard to determine just how difficult lives are for Jews in Germany. Throughout the history of the Holy Roman Empire and the German Confederation they were oppressed and discriminated, and yet they managed to go above all else, and create a flourishing economic history in their wake. Such tenacity is to be praised.’

    The two brothers never really gave up their anti-Semitism, that much is known, however they were willing to hide it in public, to gain the support of the rich ethno-nationalist German Jews to fund their ideology. Politically the brothers described their ideology as:-


    • Anti-Liberal, Anti-Communist, Anti-Conservative
    • The creation of a national dictatorship of the people to regulate the economic structure of the state and to transform social relations within a modern self-determined culture and the expansion of the nation into an empire.
    • A political aesthetic of romantic symbolism, mass mobilization, a positive view of ‘righteous violence’ (in their view) and the promotion of masculinity, youth and charismatic authoritarian agenda and rule. [3]
    • Might is Right
    Economically their ideology was a centrist version of anti-establishment economics, with wealth redistribution, and the breakup of large centralized estates into decentralized estates and guilds (hence the name of the ideology) and the establishment of a supervisory economic chamber in the government to supervise the economy and intervene when necessary. On nationalistic terms, it castigated Austrians as backstabbers and inferior Germans, and blamed the ‘conniving slav and inferiors of Austria’ for the dissolution of the German dream. Subscribing to the idea of Living Space being necessary for the Germans, it was a radical far-right ultra-nationalistic ideology in all basic forms. For dangerously, it promised ‘the harshest retribution against the Austrians, those who have betrayed all Aryans, and the Slavs, who have plundered this nation.’ It would be a grim foreshadowing.

    1625376120258.png

    Flag of Gildeism/Strasserism

    The book sold through. And it was a success. The country bought the book and the ideology that the Strasser Brothers became so popular, that the German Guildeist Party Deutsche Gildenparty (DG) was established by the brothers on the 18th of July, 1921, and would become a foreshadow on events that were to come in Europe.” A Political History of Gildeism: Its Rise and Fall © 2018 [4]

    ***

    “Epitacio Pessoa, was elected President of Brazil in 1919 when he was in France to discuss a trading offer with the French government, certainly a unique succession in Brazilian history. He won the elections carrying 263,373 votes against 116,414 having never left France at all. More importantly, his candidacy was supported by Minas Gerais, and even more importantly, it was the first defeat of the Coffee With Milk Policy as for the first time in Brazilian Republican History, oligarchic candidates from Sao Paolo had been defeated in an open election.


    1625376153283.png

    Epitacio Pessoa, President of Brazil, 1919-1921

    Pessoa however inherited a republic in crisis. The growth of worker movements throughout the world after the end of the Great War had affected the Brazilians as well, and the Great War had put Brazil’s entire economy in jeopardy. Brazil’s oligarchs had an unsurprising tendency to overprice their coffee and rubber produce, which forced the war strained economies of Europe to turn to the Ottoman Empire for coffee and to Siam and the Franco-British and Dutch colonies in South East Asia to make up for their rubber demands as well. And despite his wish to escape the policy, Pessao was unable to escape the infamous Governors Policy. The Governor’s Policy was a state agreement in the Republic of Brazil in which the Federal Government supported unrestricted state power within state governments and in return these states made use of military intimidation through the use of the Colones (coronelismo) to elect pro-federal governmental officials, which virtually negated any opposition in the government.

    Pessao keenly understood that the riots going on in Brazil was related to the oligarchic situation of the country. Workers, Communists, Socialists, Nationalists, Proto-Gildeists, Monarchists were all openly brawling in Brazilian society. Pessao had good intentions, but what he did can be summed up as ‘Trying to Please Everyone, but Pleasing no one’.

    He carried out impressive economic activities, installing 205 kilometers of wires in the deep of the Amazon to improve communications, 250 wells in the Amazon and impoverish regions were built, and ~500 kilometers of local railway systems were inaugurated under his reign. He took care of the coffee and rubber industry of the country, trying to manage to keep the prices at market level to recover trade from Europe, however this was not enough to satisfy the completely untenable and unsustainable situation of the poverty in the local population.

    Politically he tried to appeal to both sides as a moderate candidate, passing some reforms that were acceptable to the oligarchs, and at the same time, flirting with monarchism when he lifted the ban on the Brazilian Imperial Family on the 8th of April, allowing them to return back to Brazil after 32 years. At first this policy was praised by many in the Brazilian government, however the arrival of Isabel, the last monarch of Brazil, back to Brazil soured matters. Former slaves throughout the Brazilian country, and monarchists and sympathizers of the Imperial family arrived in Rio de Janeiro on the 17th of May to receive the Imperial Family drawing a massive crowd of nearly 250,000 people, which was a fifth of the total population of the entire city at the time. Isabel was welcomed heartily, and her speech, a little ragged by age, received a massive applause, especially when she stated, ‘If the abolition is the cause of the fall of the Empire, then I do not regret it; I consider it worth losing the throne for.’


    1625376193372.png

    a picture of the former Empress Isabel taken in Brazil after she returned.

    This newfound popularity of the returned Imperial family threatened the power of the Oligarchs, and several of these people complained to Pessoa demanding that the ban be placed again. Pessoa had however made an alliance with moderates in the legislature, and he did not back down and allowed the Imperial Family to return in peace and solitude.

    However more importantly to bring the economy back into line, the President of Brazil began to cut funding to the navy and the army. He stated that for a peacetime army, such a massive funding was irresponsible and unneeded. The President began to walk a thin line when he began that process, and in 1919, 1920 the arms and army budget was cut by more than 20%. This angered the military, which had remained powerful for a long time in Brazilian Republican history, and they were now starting to rumble with discontent. Moreover, the Young Turks had increased their power in the Brazilian Military.

    The Young Turks was a colloquial term used by the Brazilian military to denote officers who had received military training in Imperial Germany. After 1917, the situation was no longer tenable, and the Young Turks had been recalled back to Brazil. However their powerful regiments made them powerful politically as well, and led by Marshal Hermes da Fonseca, the leaders of the Young Turks in Brazil remained powerful. And they weren’t all too happy with the budget cuts. In early 1921, the President also tried to trim down the size of the military and the generals reacted violently, telling the president that they would not accept anything as such with the threat of civil war hanging on them.

    More importantly, it was becoming increasingly clear that the anti-military Artur Bernades would become the successor to Pessoa, and the military was starting to agitate that a new successor be chosen. Anti-Pessoa and Anti-Bernades Oligarchs aided the military and began to ally with one another to forward their own goals in the Brazilian government. With tensions between the government and military existing as it was, it would only take one real crisis to allow the situation to boil over. That came in the form of the False Letter Crisis, when a letter supposedly written by Artur Bernades to Raul Soares, insulted the armed forces, and called Marshal Hermes da Fonseca a ‘dilapidated old fool for a sergeant’ in several newspapers, it was obvious that the military would have to take action. The Marshal himself organized a military meeting, and with monetary backing from oligarchs, and the support of the Young Turks, he gathered his most prominent and influential military supporters such as Bertoldo Klinger, Euclid Figueiredo, Parga Rodrigues etc, and the military began to plan a coup. On the 24th of June, 1921, the military did as such, and the entire government was arrested by the military for charges of ‘treason, action against the state, and rebellion against Brazil’s natural virtues’.

    The Minister of Commerce, Jose do Rio tried to escape during the coup, and he was shot by the military in the head, killing him instantly. The Minister of the Navy, Joao Pedro da Veiga Miranda defected to the military and supported them in the coup, and the Minister of External and Foreign Relations, Jose Manuel de Azevedo Marques was also shot in the stomach during the coup, however he survived the attempt at his life. The entire government was then frozen and dissolved, and the Marshal Hermes da Fonseca took power back, with the legislature’s building surrounding the building, they named him President of Brazil. He appointed Bertoldo Klinger as the Minister of Agriculture and Farms, whilst he also appointed Euclid Figueiredo became the Minister of External Relations. Parga Rodrigues became the minister of Road, Public Works, and Economics and Commercial Affairs. Admiral Manuel Inacio Belfort Veira was appointed the Minister of Justice and Home Affairs, whilst the Marshal took the reins of the War and Naval Ministries himself.

    The Brazilian President, Epitacio Pessoa was killed in a scuffle during the coup, and his family was forced to flee into Uruguay as well. The Military Dictatorship had started, and the Brazilian First Republic had fallen. The Marshal brought the ban on the Imperial Family back again, and Isabel died during the military’s attempt to deport her back to Portugal. The mishandling of the military and her already poor health took her over the edge, and killed the last monarch of Brazil. The other members of the Imperial Family left Brazil for the second time, intent on going back to Portugal. In Portugal, King Manuel II denounced the military coup de etat and welcomed his relatives back to Portugal. Manuel II’s plan to visit Brazil on its centenary celebration of independence was cancelled as well. Unfortunately despite the efforts of Pessoa, the oligarchy and power of the military in brazil was conserved, at the point of the barrel of a gun.” The Dictatorship in Rio, 1921 – 1978 © Penguin Publishing, 2009

    ***

    ***

    [1] –True fact.

    [2] – Reached 6 million pounds otl in 1911

    [3] – Definition of Fascism by Wikipedia and by Prebble Ramswell

    [4] – A more centrist Nazism, basically, and yeah unfortunately its going to be gruesome. The needed disclaimer that I don’t support the character’s actions can be inserted here.
     
    Vignette #2: The Radicals
  • Vignette #2: The Radicals

    ***

    David Ben-Gurion idly wondered what the hell he had been drinking when he agreed to meet with the people that Ben-zvi was eager to introduce him with. He had already taken an earful of angry mutterings and shouts from his wife, and frankly, he couldn’t blame her. His life in Thessaloniki or if you were Turkish like Ben-Gurion’s wife, Salonika was good. He had a stable political career, as one of the city’s premier politicians, and he had already made a good name for himself as a former veteran of the army. His wife was the column editor of the local English newspapers as well, and earned good sums of money. He didn’t want to be drawn into the world of radical Zionism, like his friend Yitzhak.

    Small thumps on the door was heard, and Ben-Gurion sighed. He received a pointed look from his wife, Jihaan, as she pointedly looked at him before cradling their son, Ariel and lifting him up and retreating back into their room. David gulped slightly and took a big sigh before walking up to the front door and opened it slowly. The features, most especially the laugh lines of his friend, Yitzhak Ben-zvi could be seen perfectly, and the rough but lean feature of the man that he had brought with him, Israel Shochat could be seen perfectly as well.

    “Come on in.” David flourished and gestured. The two men muttered greetings and entered the small house and sat down in the living room. Yitzhak was pointedly glaring at David. David ignored him. He was wearing his Fez hat as a message and Yitzhak seemed to recognize that. After a few moments of pointed silence, David spoke up. “I believe you two gentlemen have a proposal for me?”

    Shochat leaned forward and stippled his fingers before looking at David. “I have heard that when you were young, you were heavily involved in the Zionist cause.”

    “I was.” David answered shortly.

    “Was?” Shochat questioned. “What happened to that belief then? What about now?”

    “I am a member of the Ottoman Jewish Front Organization. It’s leader in the Vilayet of Salonika actually.” David answered tersely.

    Shochat’s eyebrows disappeared into his hairline in surprise or anger, and his face seemed to take on an angry disposition. “The OJFO? They’re traitors you realize?”

    “Traitors?” David asked, mentally asking to the heavens why he didn’t take the advice of his wife of not drinking so often.

    “They have given up the dream of an independent Israel haven’t they? Consorting with the Turks!” Shochat hissed as he seemed to be make gestures with his hand that didn’t make sense to David in particular.

    “I am unsure whether my friend Yitzhak here mentioned this to you.” David began slowly. “But I have given up on that dream too.”

    “So I have heard.” Shochat answered back smoothly. “But I do not believe that.”

    David clenched his eyes and sighed. He leaned back. “It’s a long story.”

    “I have all the time in the world Mr. Ben-Gurion.”

    “In 1906, I immigrated to this empire with my childhood sweetheart, Rachel Nelkin, Yitzhak can fill in for her if he has the time.” David began slowly choosing his words as he was lost in a sea of reminiscence. “I came to Palestine to lead the Aliyah movement and secure the foundation of a future independent Israel. And even though I blatantly talked at times about ‘political independence’ for Jews in the Empire, do you know how the Arabs treated me? They treated me with kindness. In Jaffa, I was loved by the Arabs. They called me David Saheb. That was when I felt the first crack in my disposition.”

    Shochat seemed to be angry at the explanation but he didn’t interrupt. Yitzhak of course knew, so he kept quiet.

    “In 1911 I enrolled in the University of this City, the one near the pier by the way, and despite my status as a political agitator I was allowed education in the Empire.” David continued softly. “Cracks began to show then as well. But in 1915, the ultimate thing happened after completing my studies. The Bulgarians, Montenegrins and Serbians invaded. I immediately knew it was a chance to create goodwill for Jews in the Empire and volunteered for the Ottoman Jewish Legions. And do you know how I was rewarded for that? Radical Zionists, your organization, Hashomer killed my fiancée in retaliation. It was then that I broke away from the cause of an independent Israel you know? I gave everything that I had in the army, and got shot in the foot for saving a battalion of our regiment from encirclement in Haskovo. The Bey commanding our portion of the army was impressed and there I met my now wife, Jihaan. After the war I settled down, conducted my business in law, and got to know Jihaan before falling for her, marrying her, and having a son. After the war I met a man who went by the name of Mustafa Kemal. Persuaded me to join the Liberal Union, to safeguard the rights of Jews in the Empire and to make them an integral part of the empire.”

    David sighed and smiled warily. He spread his arms wide. “And here I am.”

    “I am sorry about your intended Mr. Ben-Gurion. I can assure you that that was a mistake on part of my organization….” Shochat began.

    “Perhaps, but that was six years ago. And I have forgiven most for that incident. I must admit I had a small sadistic glee when I heard that the government was hunting your organization down, but otherwise I have retained an ambivalent position.” David cut in tersely before sighing and rubbing his eyes. “Mr. Shochat, as a lawfully sworn in Ottoman citizen and politician, you should be happy that I have not informed the police. It is out of respect for my friend here that I haven’t. You have heard my story and my reason as to why I am not willing to aid you, so I must ask you to leave.”

    At this, Shochat stood up angrily. “You would forsake the Promised Land? All because a bird you were sweet on died?”

    Anger coursed through his veins. Jihaan had been so kind, so understanding, so beautiful, but the loss of Rachel still hurt him. He was immediately on his feet, his face stormy. “Mr. Shochat, I believe that it is time for you to leave. Yitzhak, remind me never to accept your ‘meetings’ ever again.”

    Shochat tried to argue, but Yitzhak knew a lost cause when he saw one and pulled Shochat away. He looked at David and nodded, smiling slightly beneath his quiet demeanour. David waved at him and closed the door with a small click.

    “Are they gone?” Came the quiet voice of his wife in Turkish. Honestly, David had forgotten they had been conversing in Hebrew. He switched back to Turkish as he nodded his head.

    “Yes, they’re gone.” David nodded. Jihaan hesitated before surging forward and hugging him.

    “I know how difficult it is for you to think of Rachel. Are you fine?” Jihaan murmured in a small voice.

    “Yes I’m fine.” David smiled slightly. “I was angry at his disrespect of her, that’s all.”

    Jihaan nodded. David quickly changed the somber atmosphere by asking, “Is Ariel ok?”

    Jihaan’s eyes lit up and she led him into their room and began to speak with him about their son as Ariel played with the few toys that he had. Looking at his family, smiling, and playing and laughing, David could feel true happiness coursing through him. He would not give this up for the world.

    ***
     
    Chapter 46: Diplomatic and Political Moves
  • Chapter 46: Diplomatic and Political Moves

    ***

    “Imperial Conferences, or as they were known before 1907; Colonial Conferences, are periodic gatherings of the governmental leaders of the autonomous regions and countries of the British Empire. All of the Conferences have been held in London, the seat of the Empire, and the British Crown/Monarchy, which is what unites the Dominions of the Empire together. Since 1907, the governments of all the dominions and UK agreed that all of the meetings would need to take place on grounds of governmental service rather than simple meetings between diplomats during royal occasions. In accordance with this memorandum, Imperial Conferences took place in 1911, 1915, and 1918, and all of these largely took place to deal with the repercussions of the Great War, both economically and diplomatically. The next imperial conference was slated to take place between 12 July and 5 August in London, the United Kingdom, and there were four major topics that were pervading all of the participating countries.

    The Anglo-Japanese Alliance was to expire on the 13th of July, 1921, and the issue of its renewal was called into one of the agendas of the conference. Growing tensions with Russia after the Great War was called the Second Agenda of the Conference, whilst the question of an alliance with the Ottoman Empire became the third agenda. The question of the autonomy of the Dominion’s legislatures from the Westminster Parliament also became a part of the agenda, thereby becoming the last main agenda during the Imperial Conference.


    1626524642354.png

    the 1921 Imperial Conference.

    The 1921 Imperial Conference became the first Imperial Conference in which India was represented as a ‘Non-Dominion But Self-Governing Colony’, represented by the Secretary of State for India, Viscount Peel, and Khengarji III in his capacity as Maharao of Cutch, and finally V.S. Srinivasa Sastri as the Member of the Council of State of India. The members of the 1921 Imperial Conference were:-

    King-Emperor: George V of the United Kingdom
    Prime Minister of the United Kingdom: Austen Chamberlain
    Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom: Lord Curzon
    Secretary of State for the Colonies: The Duke of Devonshire
    Prime Minister of Australia: William Hughes
    Prime Minister of Canada: Arthur Meighen
    Minister of Naval Service of Canada: Charles Ballantyne
    Secretary of State of India: the Viscount Peel
    Maharao of Cutch: Khengarji III
    Representative of the Council of State of India: V.S. Srinivasa Sastri
    Prime Minister of New Zealand: William Massey
    Prime Minister of South Africa: Jan Smuts

    The first major agenda, as listed above, was the question of the renewal of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance. At the beginning of the Great War, Sir Edward Grey, hoping to keep Japan satisfied with enough gains, but not enough to challenge British supremacy of the Pacific Ocean, engaged in several diplomatic meetings with the Japanese Empire. In late 1915, the Japanese Empire, and the British Empire signed a secret agreement wherein the northern Mariana Islands and several smaller German islands in the region were ceded to Japan, alongside 8 million pounds being granted to Japan as compensation for Australian and New Zealander claims to the other islands that Japan had their eyes on. Throughout the war, the Japanese proved to be a faithful ally, and the Imperial Japanese Navy patrolled the Indian and Pacific Oceans, escorting over 600,000 ANZAC forces and 1,000,000 Indian troops to British Africa and into the Mediterranean. In early 1916, with the political situation in Great Britain changing, the Japanese further increased their participation in the war by starting to send squadrons into the Mediterranean which escorted key French and British convoys in the region, saving several thousand convoys from being sunk by Italian and Austrian submarines operating in the region. Japan emerged from the war economically dominant in the eastern Hemisphere, and no eastern power could call themselves the dominant economic powerhouse other than Japan. Japan’s industrial production outstripped all others in the hemisphere. As economic nationalism rose in the Japanese Empire, other powers began to rumble with discontent. The Island Empire of the Pacific was after the Great War, one of the Greatest Powers of the World. China, who was trying to create its own powerful indigenous companies growled in annoyance as Japanese goods dominated their market, the Russians became increasingly worried with their naval weakness in the Far East, and the American government was becoming worried about the increasing prominence of Japanese goods in the Western Coast of the USA. The USA was also not unaware of the Japanese involvement in the American-Filipino War and that had also led to cold relations between Tokyo and Washington.

    1626524759782.png

    Australian Prime Minister William Hughes

    At the Peace Conference of the Great War in Versailles, Australian Prime Minister William Hughes led the opposition to Japan’s request of recognition of racial equality, fearing it would be a veiled demand for a revision of Australia’s infamous racial immigration legislation. France and Britain were more open to the demands, and whilst small pro-equality points were included in the treaty, for fear of autonomy and revolt in the vast French and British colonial empires, a full declaration of equality for all racial groups had not been integrated into the treaty, much to Japanese anger and Australian relief.

    With the fall of Imperial Germany, and the rise of Imperial China, the British Empire no longer needed Japan in maintaining the integrity of her empire, and the threats to its stability were becoming more internal than external after the Great War. After the Great War, there was only one country left that could combat the British Empire on equal terms; the United States of America, (Russia had become too economically dependent on the UK during the Great War to become an efficient threat), but war between the UK and the USA was unthinkable for both Washington and London, and something that would take the most absurd of events to take place in order to produce a war between the two Anglophone countries. Therefore neither Japan nor Britain needed the protection of an alliance for defensive purposes. The Anglo-Japanese Treaty no longer served vital British interest, and yet the agreement began to threaten amicable relations between the United States and the United Kingdom, but also between the relations between the mother country of Britain and the children country of the Dominion of Canada; which was in accord with the American attitude to Japan.

    Australia, New Zealand and Canada were all directly concerned with the renewal of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, and the tendency in Australasia of viewing the treaty as a protection against Japanese aggression and expansion in the South Pacific was widespread. Also, on the other hand, neither Australia nor New Zealand were anxious to contribute heavily into the alliance, fearing a possible Japanese advance, both militarily and diplomatically. Japanese proposals for racial equality had also antagonized Australia, into making large imperative expenditures for the military and naval defense of the ‘White Australia’ program. Despite this, Prime Minister Hughes of Australia was willing to support the renewal of the alliance, on the condition that modifications were made which avoided awkward questions about race, and ethnicity whilst also trying to maintain American friendliness to the Australian economy.

    Massey of New Zealand adopted a more pro-Japanese stance, but even he was not willing to accept a treaty with Japan without modifications, citing the ‘old fear of Yellow Immigration’. The press of Canada on the other hand came out against the renewal of the treaty, with the popular newspaper Montreal Star calling the alliance a ‘destruction of Canadian Immigration Policy’. Similarly the Canadian delegation were starting to fear the growing Japanese economic dominance of their Pacific Coast and were starting to become as anti-Japanese as the Australians. Prime Minister Hughes of Australia suggested that a new conference be held at another date to include both Japanese and American delegations as well, but he warned that it would also be unwise, considering the rising tensions between Japan and America over the Second American-Filipino War. On the eighth day of the conference, both Australian and New Zealander Prime minister delivered their memorandum on the issue of the renewal, declaring,

    …….New Zealand and Australia, while appreciating Japan’s assistance in the Great War, have resolved to remain White Men’s Countries. They had prepared plans for a big scheme, firstly only imperial and lastly only European immigration into their countries. The scheme will presently be launched and will emphatically object to a renewal of the Anglo-Japanese Treaty which is unjustified, considering Russia stands as an ally, and Germany as a menace has been removed, and America is ready to make common cause in the event of a Japanese Peril. The question must be properly thrashed out….[2]

    When Canadian Prime Minister Meighen stated his belief to firmly oppose any sort of renewal of the Anglo-Japanese Treaty as well, the British and South Africans, who were willing and in favor of renewing the treaty were forced to acquiesce, and the Anglo-Japanese Treaty was not renewed by London. This led to a flurry of emotions, and Anglo-Japanese relations were broken for the rest of the two decades. [1]

    Despite British economic dominance in Russia following the Great War, tensions with Russia had been growing. Ever since 1707, the British had followed a policy of not allowing any single power gaining absolute power in the European Continent, and now with the destruction of Imperial Germany, only the Empire of Danubia and the French Republic stood as possible counters to Russia, and France was allied to Russia, whilst Danubia alone would be able to put up a good fight, but wouldn’t be able to win against any Russian onslaught. Where Russia had lost their influence in the Far East and Pacific, they had increased their influence in Europe, which was threatening Imperial interests. As a result, the Imperial Conference of 1921, debated the idea of a new Anglo-Ottoman Alliance aimed against Russian interests in Southern Europe. Ottoman advance in the military and economic sectors had meant that an alliance with the Ottomans seemed like a good idea for all members involved, however some hesitation continued in the members of the Imperial Conference. In particular, there were fears that a repeat of 1828 – 1876, wherein the Ottomans had managed to reform and bounce back from being the Sick man of Europe to again rapidly failing in front of Russia would be repeated. As such, by the end of the Imperial Conference, the powers of the British Empire agreed to extend a treaty of mutual assistance (but not alliance) with the Ottoman Empire, regarding the territorial sovereignty of the British and Ottoman Empires.

    Finally, the last agenda was the question of legislative independence of the Dominions from the jurisdiction of the Westminster Parliament. The United Kingdom itself was a supporter of such an idea, but needed to tie in the British Empire’s dominions under her rule in different manners as well. As a result, the Salisbury Declaration was issued during the 1921 Imperial Conference of the British Empire in London by the Marques of Salisbury, the Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom. It declared the UK and the Dominions to be:

    …..autonomous communities within the British Empire, equal in status, in no way subordinate to one another in any aspect of their domestic or external affairs, though united by a common allegiance to the Crown, a common foreign and defense policy, and freely associated members of the British Commonwealth of Nations…….[3]

    An Empire wide commission consisting of New Zealanders, Australians, British, Canadians and South Africans, called the Commonwealth Inter-relation Committee (CIC) was created by the conference to flesh out the full details of this new relationship between the center of the empire, the UK, and the Dominions, for a time period of 7 years.


    1626524831418.png

    James Gascoyne-Cecil, 4th Marquess of Salisbury

    The Man who issued the Salisbury Declaration
    Thus with the main agendas completed, the Imperial Conference of 1921 went on towards other smaller matters such as trade, tariffs and the navy……..” A History of Imperial Conferences: 1887 – present. © Penguin Publishing, c. 2020

    ***

    “The anti-democratic ideals of Tsar Nicholas II and the pro-Democratic positions of Russian Prime Minister Sergey Muromtsev made it sure that a complex situation arose in Russian politics. In particular, the Russian Prime Minister was painfully aware of the fact that British and French goods dominated the Russian market, and that economically, the country was dependent on these two countries to keep their economy in line. The Russian Prime Minister was well aware that some Russian industries, such as Coal, Oil, Gold, Copper, Cast Iron, Iron and Steel, and Egg were extremely powerful and lucrative, however all other facets of the Russian industry were extremely weak and underdeveloped. The Russian Empire was still predominantly agrarian and the GDP per Capita was excruciatingly low, with only Portugal having a lower GDP per Capita than Russia in Europe, and the Ottomans matching a steady balance with the Russians on per capita terms. Muromtsev was well aware of this fact, and he wished to increase the service sector of the economy and make it more beneficial to the Russian people as a whole. Similarly, the creation of the Realm of Poland, which was sort of like a Dominion for the Russian Empire, was something that had made several nationalities in the Russian Empire demand something similar as well. Muromstev knew that something like that was an impossibility, however he was amenable to several more reforms which would ensure that minority rights were assured. In particular Muromstev heard the plight of Finnish nationalists and stopped the second phase of the Russification program in Finland, with support of the Finnish Senate.

    Nicholas II, meanwhile was watching all of these reforms with an increased eye that was beginning to dislike all of the reforms that were being propagated by the Russian government. His ears turned to the nobility of the empire, all of whom were angered by the new reforms, which would empower the people, and make the traditional nobility in Russian disenfranchised of much of their power and influence over the common populace. On one occasion, visited by his British cousins and relatives, Nicholas II tried to broach the topic of creating the nobility of Russia in the same manner as Britain, or Danubia, which ensured that power and wealth remained with the nobles, whilst the people were enfranchised as well. This idea was horrible in the minds of the nobility as they rationalized that unlike Great Britain and Danubia, the Russian Empire had a massive leftist movement, which would certainly take advantage of such a system. As such the proposal was shot down by the Russian nobility and landowner class.

    Prominent nobles, and autocrats in the Russian nobility, like the Archdukes of Belozoro and the families of Kazan began to whisper in the ears of the Tsar, and Tsar Nicholas II was starting to become paranoid about rumors flying around that he was going to be replaced by Tsarevich Alexei, who was more amenable to be the hands off monarch that Muromstev so desired.


    1626524989180.png

    Tsarevich Alexei of Russia in 1925
    1626525225182.png
    Princess Eudoxia of Bulgaria

    Alexei, at the age of 17, was a capable young prince, capable, and held a deep compassion and kindness, however he was also known to be firm in his dealings and his debates with the nobility of Russia. As such, the perfect man for a semi-liberal Tsar of Russia. However, Alexei’s Hemophilia meant that he was also extremely vulnerable, and even the smallest of wounds posed the threat of fatality to the young prince. And it was almost assured that he wouldn’t live past 50. As a result, Tsar Nicholas II first started to try and distract his young son from politics wherein he couldn’t get involved. Nicholas II, knowing that his son would come of age the next year, began to lobby the nobility of his empire, and outside, to try and find a potential spouse for Alexei. Alexei was a hemophiliac, however men couldn’t pass the disease on, so despite some apprehension, there were many volunteers to become the next Russian Empress. Among several prominent candidates were Princess Ileana of Romania, Princess Eudoxia of Bulgaria, Princess Elena Georgievna, Countess Stefan Tyszkiewicz, etc, it was finally decided that Princess Eudoxia of Bulgaia would be the wife of Alexei. Alexei, decided to go to Bulgaria, to meet his future wife, and to court her and to know her better. Eudoxia herself was eager to meet her new intended, and formally extended an invitation to the Russian Tsarevich. Nicholas II, in his growing paranoia, was all the willing to have his son leave the country for a small period of time, and with suitable security, Alexei left for Bulgaria. With his pesky son, who was always badgering for more reformist ideals out of the way, Nicholas II turned his attention to Muromstev. On the allegation of embezzlement, Nicholas II had Muromstev ousted from the position of Prime Minister of Russia on the 18th of August, 1921, and had him replaced with Peter Berngardovich Struve, who was a member of the ruling Constitutional Democratic Party.

    Struve was an ardent pro-monarchical advocate within the Constitutional Democratic Party, and though he was a liberal, much like Muromstev, his liberal ideas were more in line with the ideas of Tsar Nicholas II himself, and as a result, he found himself, with imperial aid, rising the ranks of Russian politics extremely fast. Struve wasn’t a bad prime minister. He continued a moderate industrialization policy which reinforced the natural resource extraction industry of the Russian Empire, which allowed for greater credit and greater revenue to flow into the Russian Empire, and while he didn’t overturn Russian nationalistic policies, he did give some figurative olive branch policies to minorities, and increased studies in Belarusian, Ukrainian and Finnish, however he remained ruthless to his opponents, and several political purges were undertaken under his reign as Prime Minister.


    1626525283143.png

    Peter Berngardovich Struve, Russia's new Prime Minister

    However Nicholas II using his constitutional rights to remove Muromstev without a political crisis in government sparked extreme resentment, and made republicanism a more appealing factor to many in the Russian government. In particular, Alexander Kerensky, who had risen to become the leader of the Trudoviks in 1920, was known to have been involved in several anti-monarchist groups in the Russian political sphere, began to push for more reforms which would transform Russia into a figurehead monarchy at best and a republic at worst. In this ideal, Kerensky found aid from Lev Kamenev, the leader of the Left Coalition in the Russian State Duma, who was also known for having republican leanings. Kamenev was known to be an enigma as a leftist communist politician, and he had at times spouted ideas of a ‘communist monarchy in Russia’ [4] which was frankly, an idea atrocious to both socialists and monarchists in Russia. He called for an absolute constitutional and figurehead monarchy and at times wasn’t shy of calling for a republic either. A governmental pact formed between the Left Coalition and the Trudoviks on the 7th of September, 1921 made it clear that that two political factions would become allied with one another in their goal for a figurehead/full constitutional monarchy in Russia without the interference of Tsar Nicholas II to stop reforms.

    1626525481898.png

    The old Russian Imperial Eagle was the symbol of Russian Guildism.

    Similarly, other political developments were taking place as well. Influenced by Serbian radicalism and German Guildism, Pavel Rafalovich Bermondt-Avalov, a prominent ultra-Russian nationalist, and the leader of the Don Cossacks within the Imperial Russian Army formed the Russian Guildist Council, which followed guildist principles of ultra-nationalism. In contrast to German and Serbian Guildism, the Russian version of guildism was extremely anti-Semitic, calling upon conservative and traditional Judaism, and encouraged Russification throughout the state. Their manifesto, Diya Nashikh Russkikh Narodov (Для наших русских народов) (For Our Russian Peoples) was also extremely popular in many segments of Russian society.

    As such, Russian politics was starting to become quickly polarized, and the people were quickly choosing political sides, which was bound to make problems in the future. The foundations for the Russian Civil War were being laid down……” Russian Civil War: 1930 – 1936; a History © St. Petersburg Imperial Publishing, 1999.

    ***

    “1921 had no great elections inside of the Ottoman Empire, however two key important elections were slated to take place within the Empire in 1921, which would prove to be a precursor to the 1922 Ottoman General Election and the 1922 Senatorial Elections. The Governorship Elections were slated to be held in 1921 in the Vilayet of Salonika, and after much appropriation and negotiations, the first non-partisan election was going to take place within the Principality of Samos.

    The Governor of Salonika was Ali Ferid Pasha, who was a member of the ruling CUP party. He wasn’t a particularly bad Governor, however his policies of deferring to the central government, sometimes made it feel to the Vilayet that the autonomy of the region was not being respected by its governor. Much of the economic upliftments of the region also came at the hands of the central government and not the governor, who liked to keep a hands off attitude to the region, which soured opinions against him. To compete against his re-election as Governor, was former Senator Reshid Akif Pasha. Reshid Pasha was a Greco-Albanian politician within the Ottoman Empire, and as such, he was more appealing to the majority Greek population of the Vilayet as well. He had been governor of Sivas from 1901 to 1908, and he had once been the minister of the interior, and from 1910 – 1921, he had been the senator for Ioannina before resigning early in the year to go after his intention of being governor. No one could thus say that Reshid Akif Pasha was not experienced.

    In particular, the greatest issues and concerns during the elections that were taking place in the Vilayet, was the issue of coastal vs inland problems. The Vilayet of Selanik was increasingly being focused only on the coastal regions, and the populace of the inland portions of the vilayet agitated for more inclusion of inland Selanik in developmental plans and economic upliftments. The development of the campaign for the elections, was also quite fractious, as other regional parties in the Vilayet like the Poale Zion, Ottoman Socialist, Ottoman Liberal, Ottoman Social Democrat, Greek Nationalist parties managed to clog up campaign speeches, and campaign regions as well. In particular, several early campaign moves were drowned out in particular by the Greek Nationalist Party led by Kyriakos Kyritsis, who was determined to boycott the elections, and call it into question, whilst also frustrating electoral campaigns of everyone else involved. Reshid Pasha enlisted the aid of economist Mehmed Cavit Bey to form an economic policy that could see him elected as governor. Mehmed Cavit outlined a new economic policy, which cut into the partial austerity measures of Ali Ferid, and created more service economic opportunities for both the coastal and inland members of the vilayet. This manifesto also expanded on railway and hospital policies, and was published by Reshid Pasha during the campaign. Mehmed Cavit Pasha was also an influential politician in his own right, and his influence in the region allowed Reshid Pasha to gain more votes as well.

    However during the campaign, there were isolated incidents of politically motivated violence as well, largely consisting of the Greek and Bulgarian nationalists of the region, who were involved in political attacks at the parties that they opposed. Nonetheless, while this was upsetting, they were only small and few and far between, and the election went on. Most crucially, Reshid Pasha also managed to gain the endorsement of Emmanuel Carasso, the Deputy of the Ottoman Parliament for Salonika. Carasso, a prominent Sephardic Jews in Ottoman Governmental Service, managed to give the challenger to the current governor a great deal of Jewish votes as well.


    ottoman election 1.png

    During the elections that took place in early July, Reshid Akif Pasha managed to win 316,292 votes against his rival, who won 284,421 votes, and managed to take the mantle as Governor of the Salonica Vilayet. As a member of the Liberal Union, Reshid Pasha managing to break Salonika’s pro-CUP attitude was going to be a prelude to the 1922 Ottoman General Elections.

    ---

    During the Greek Revolution of 1821-29, the Island of Samos had rebelled against the government of the Ottoman Empire in favor of the Greek Revolution, however their proximity to the heart of the Ottoman Empire meant that the rebellion in the island was stamped out fast. Nonetheless, as a compromise, the Principality of Samos was created by the Ottomans, which allowed Samos to exist as a semi-autonomous entity within the Empire. In 1914, the Ottomans abolished the system of handpicking the Prince of Samos, and allowed non-partisan elections for the position take place. However, ever since that time, Grigorios Vegleris, the Prince of Samos after 1915, began to become involved in creating a fully functioning partisan democracy within the Samian lands of the Ottoman Empire.

    For six years he had persevered and had supported the Ottoman Empire throughout the Balkan War to prove his loyalty to the Ottoman State, and his policies of expanding Greek studies in the island was also moderately paced, to gain the support of the Ottoman Empire. On the 3rd of February, 1921, the Ottoman Chamber of Deputies convened to discuss the draft that he forwarded, which called for a full partisan democracy within the Principality of Samos, and its devolved Assembly. The act was heated, and debated a lot. The Committee of Union and Progress was not eager to grant the draft, and Riza himself was not pleased with the act, however cross-party support from the Liberal Union and the Ottoman Socialist Party made sure that the act passed in the Ottoman Chamber of Deputies with a margin of 153 – 135. As such, the first partisan elections in Samos were going to be held in September of 1921.

    In particular, the support of Meletius IV of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople aided the act to pass. However Meletius IV’s involvement raised eyebrows. He was known to be a supporter of Prime Minister Venizelos of Greece, and there were questions of Greek involvement in the process. Nonetheless, his aid in passing the act through was extremely instrumental nonetheless.

    As the government of both Samos and the Ottoman Empire began to prepare for the first partisan elections, two parties came to the forefront. The Liberal Samian Party had been a political group founded by Grigorious Velgeris, and the party was based on the ideology of pro-ottomanism, pro-autonomy, and pro-centrism. It was widely supportive of a welfare state within the Principality of Samos, and gained a lot of support from the ethnic Turks, Jews and Armenians living in the island, as it rejected enosis with the Kingdom of Greece, instead stating that it would support the Ottoman Government as long as it supported the Constitution of 1908, which guaranteed the rights of the island.

    The opposition party to the Liberal Samian Party was the Enosis Party led by Themistoklis Sofoulis. Sofoulis was an archaeological student and professor who had been involved in archaeological excavations in Samos before he was elected as a deputy for the islands in 1900. During the 1908 Young Turk Revolution, Sofoulis left Samos due to fear of arrest, and fled to Greece, where he remained a pro-unification agitator. In 1913, his arrest issue was revoked by Ali Kemal on the grounds that he only use political and peaceful means as a means for unification, which Kemal was amenable to. Sofoulis returned, and formed the pro-Unification Enosis Party in Samos, which advocated for unification with the Kingdom of Greece. Economically, the Enosis Party was a Left Nationalist party, and was a supporter of increased funding to the Samian Municipalities and increasing education primarily in Greek above all else, which attracted Greek votes, but alienated the Turkish and Jewish votes.


    1626525675103.png

    Samians going to listen to a Campaign speech in 1921

    The main issue during the campaign in the election was the question of unification with Greece. Many moderates pointed out that the Ottoman Empire, by sheer weight of population, would have a larger economy than Greece, and by its capability as a Great Power would be able to protect them from foreign threats that Greece might not be able to. The Liberal Samian Party (LSP) also attacked the Greek centric view of the Enosis Party, pointing at the noticeable Turkish and Jewish population of the island, who would be alienated by the greek-centric policies that the Enosis Party promised. The Enosis Party focused on the Greek population of the island, and instead promised that a unification with Greece in a democratic manner would allow ‘an amicable but complete divorce with the Ottoman Empire’. As such the slogan ‘Amicable Divorce’ or Filikó diazýgio in Greek became the catchphrase of the Enosis Party’s campaign.

    Finally when the time came to go to polls, the Liberal Samian Party managed to gain a total plurality of the votes, winning 41.4% or 6,607 votes and gaining 22 seats in the 53 seats Samian Assembly. The Enosis Party gained 4,996 votes (31.3%) and gained 16 seats in the Assembly. Independents took up 14 seats (most independents were largely neutral to the idea of unification with Greece and voted mostly on economic and social issues) whilst 1 speaker was appointed by the Ottoman Government. Due to no party or political group gaining majority, Vegleris formed a minority government within the legislature with his Liberal Samian Party and some pro-LSP independents at the helm. As such, in the contingent elections, he was re-elected as the Prince of Samos, whilst his preferred candidate, Alexandros Stavridis [5], was elected to be President of the Samian Assembly, which allowed him to consolidate his power over the Assembly as well.


    ottoman election 2.png

    The first partisan election of the Principality of Samos was something to behold truly, and would set the tone for the Enosis vs Anti-Enosis politics that would dominate the island until the end of the Second Great War. It would also prove that centrism as an ideology was growing in the Ottoman Empire, and set the tone for the 1922 Ottoman General Election.” Ottoman Political History: A Definitive Record; Book 6 (1920 – 1930) © University of Constantinople, 2018.

    ***

    ---

    [1] – Information and some quotes from More Light on the Abrogation of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance by Merze Tate and Fidele Foy

    [2] – Real Memorandum otl as well. Also sad reality is that Australia and NZ were very racist even for their time.

    [3] – Based on Balfour Declaration of 1926.

    [4] – true story. He submitted an idea to Lenin in 1902 calling for a communist monarchy in Russia.

    [5] – Has some relation to the famous singer /actor Nikos Stavridis, from what I read. Uncle? Is pointed out according to records.
     
    Chapter 47: End of 1921
  • Osman Reborn

    Chapter 47: End of 1921

    ***

    “The Republic of Arabia that was proclaimed under Abdullah Al-Saeed was not the force that it would be two decades later at the start of the 1920s. It was a predominantly nomadic country, full of religious reactionary folks who wanted nothing to do with modernization at all. It was predominantly a desert and the population was scattered and uncontrollable. The Republic was also for all intents and purposes an oligarchy of sorts. As such, modernizing such a place must have extremely excruciating. For such an endeavor, Al-Saeed must be commended. His first steps towards modernization of course, paradoxically came at the behest of the Ottoman Empire. Despite the fact that the Republican Revolution of 1919 had been aimed at against the Ottoman Empire, everyone with a brain in Ha’il knew that trying to defeat the Ottomans or challenge them was a fool’s hope and that the Ottomans would be the best attempt to foray into modernization. The Ottomans were of course, not eager to invest into the nomadic country. However, the Ottoman Oil Corporation was eager to scour for more oil deposits throughout Arabia, and the chance was too good to give up. As a result, the Ottoman Empire had allowed investors to start trickling into the Arab Republic by early 1920.


    1627649927679.png

    Abdullah Al-Saeed

    Arabia had one large problem. Arabia itself had no history and no consciousness of a united common identity and tribes often hated the sight of each other. Tribes fought against Tribes, and princes fought against princes. Whilst Arabia had become a Republic, it was, an oligarchic and aristocratic republic, and titles of nobility that were common in tribes were allowed to be kept, and more importantly their power was also preserved. Abdullah Al-Saeed wished to keep the aristocratic republic, whilst bringing a common identity to the forefront to unite the people. His aim was to improve the economic and cultural situation of the nomad and to make possible a stable, permanent governmental structure based on that idea. From time immemorial, the desert nomads had lived in abject poverty, though the situation for nomads in the Ottoman Empire was improving, and in continuous insecurity and want. The transition from nomad to a settled life was to be hard, Al-Saeed knew, and therefore he decided to persevere. On the 16th of January, 1921, he replaced the ruling Tribal Law with the Sharia Islamic Law, which was far more sophisticated and made it easier to put forward legislation for reform. It was the first step in towards reformation and modernization for the Republic of Arabia.

    Religiously, Al-Saeed was careful not to choose a singular ideology and he thoroughly washed his hands off Wahhabism, which he believed was an ideology that would do more harm than good for the Republic. He was also quite liberal to the Shia clans living towards the Eastern Half of the Republic and had many Shia Tribal Chiefs acting as oligarchs in favor of him. Al-Saeed would later, in 1936 privately comment that he was an agnostic, however that didn’t mean that he could afford to ignore religion in such a religious country. He erected new mosques throughout the country and using Ottoman trust funds, he had Religious schools opened up in Ha’il and Riyadh to make sure that the religious sect of the country was satisfied. He also co-opted religious officials, and had his entire cabinet made up of people that had religious links to make sure that the people were satisfied. Al-Saeed most famously also co-opted religion to make sure that the population of the country could rise. In Arabia, Women outnumbered men by a significant proportion since ancient memory and had been one of the motivators for men taking up multiple wives in Arabian tradition. Furthermore, Al-Saeed however tried to increase competition for marriages, by increasing taxation breaks and tax incentives for marrying and having children. In particular couples having more than 3 children were granted lavish stipends from the government of Al-Saeed. Maternity leave as a paid leave was first introduced into the middle east by Al-Saeed when 2 weeks of leave was arranged as law by the Arabian dictator. This led to the 1920 – 1925 baby boom in the Arabian Republic, as fertility rates in the republic went through the roof as couples were more willing to have children with all the incentives granted to them by Al-Saeed.


    1627649975015.png

    Ha'il the capital of the republic in the 20s

    Of course, a dictator is also not a dictator without a penchant for military and all that is entailed within it. The tribal armies were in particular a harm to a proper national army and the Republican Guard was woefully underfed and under-equipped by all standards of the day. Furthermore, only a quarter of the armies used proper guns and instead used sabers and swords like it was the 18th century instead. Al-Saeed knew he had to change this. Arabia would not have been able to rise to become a power strong enough to threaten Ottoman Control over the rest of Arabia whilst remaining a third rate military power. On the 27th of October, 1921 he passed a legislation which basically stated that 33% of all Tribal militias would enlist into the Republican Army, and would be organized on an inter-tribal manner. Furthermore, through the British Pirate Coast [1] and the Imams of Oman and the Sultanate of Muscat, the dictator also began to trade for proper weaponry, such as rifles, boots, and proper clothing for the army. To do this however, simple trade would not suffice and it was obvious that the country would need a foreign benefactor.

    This foreign benefactor came in the form of Russia and surprisingly Spain. Spanish Prime Minister Eduardo Dato was interested in the economic potential of the middle east, after the good showing of the Ottoman Empire during the Balkan War, and was interested in investments, whilst the Russians was interested in outflanking the Ottomans in case of a conflict. Nicolai Alexeyevich Orlov was sent by the Russian government in 1921 as the first ambassador of Russia to Arabia. The Arabians bought several trade negotiators who were amenable to find a deal between Ha’il and Petrograd. On the 28th of December, 1921, the Russians and the Arabians signed the Russo-Arabian Treaty of Trade, Commerce and Diplomatic Friendship which stipulated incentives for trading with Arabia within the Russian Economy. It would be an important first step forward for the Republic towards modernization.” Abdullah Al-Saeed: The Hero and Villain of Arabia © 2009

    ***

    “Although Burma lost its independence to Britain after the 3rd Anglo-Burmese War in 1885 with the rule of the last Burmese King, Thibaw coming to an end, this loss of independence was never reconciled to the Burmese people to the new situation of power change and whenever the opportunity arose they tried to get ammunition against the British rule in Burma. But the British colonial administrators refuted any reports of resistance in their newly conquered territories and dubbed it as a ‘law and order’ problem. British pacification of Burma was brutal, with villages levelled to the ground, and the royal family virtually destroyed by the colonial administrators and the army. In particular, the son of exiled king Thibaw, Mintha continued to offer resistance in the jungles of Burma from 1886 all the way to 1918, before he was killed in an ambush and with him his resistance movement crumbled. Western scholars have always found it uncomfortable in accepting the fact that the nationalistic spirit of Burma was deeply rooted in the spirit of British colonial rule in Burma. While writing on the matter in 1930, Cecil Hobbs writes that ‘Burmese Nationalism is of fairly recent origins. After the annexation of Burma by Her Majesty’s Government in 1886, there existed no nationalistic movement revolving around the dethroned Burmese King or royal family. It was not until after the First Great War, that the Burmese showed any marked interest in national politics.’ [2]


    1627650056792.png

    Logo of the Young Men’s Buddhist Association (YMBA)

    Actions against British colonial rule started in 1916 under the tutelage of the Young Men’s Buddhist Association (YMBA) which was opposed to British rule in Burma and favored Burmese nationalism and Buddhist Nationalism as well. During the Great War, the nationalists of the YMBA began to coalesce around a coalition of students who were protesting against the British against conscription and volunteering for the colonial armies during the war. The organization however found itself in crisis when the older members of the organization stated their belief in 1917 that the association ought to remain a-political whilst the younger members of the party obviously wanted to form a political group as a pressure party. This rupture lead to the more political members of the YMBA to split from the association and form the General Council of Burmese Associations (GCBA) which was a political pressure group coordinated towards trying to find reform in British Burma.

    The GCBA was however fundamentally pragmatic, and expressed the opinion that first self-colonial autonomy was required, then home self-rule and finally independence. And as a result the party began to coalesce around the leadership of pro-British and pro-independence leader Joseph Maung Gyi and Chit Hlain. Chit Hlaing in particular was increasingly popular among the rural population of Burma and he was called the Uncrowned King of Burma as a result. He had initially been a violent anti-British proponent of nationalistic independence warfare, however after the Great War, where he was involved in the East African Theatre, the man had turned towards politics as his goal and took a cautious pro-British stance in this matter. Joseph on the other hand was born to a Burmese father and Briitsh mother in 1882 and was popular with the technocratic and oligarchic elite of Mandalay and Rangoon. He used his British connections to great effect to fund the GCBA on multiple occasions. A chance arose for the party when in early 1921, the British government announced the Prince of Wales (known to his family as David) planned to visit Burma later that year. On March 3, the Prince of Wales arrived in Burma. Joseph and Hlain welcomed the Prince of Wales into Burma and led the prince through a tour of the country, and led him through several hunting expeditions well. A non-conspicuous series of comments made by the men dropped hints to the Prince that Burma as a colony would be more profitable and sustainable if the colony was separated from British India and the same reforms were applied in Burma as well. When the Prince of Wales left Burma for Delhi in May 28, 1921, he made sure to relay the comment to the Viceroy of India, Lord Chelmsford.


    1627650357479.png

    Chit Hlain, the so called Uncrowned King of Burma

    To be perfectly honest, Lord Chelmsford had been thinking about separating Burma from British India ever since he had taken power, however had not acted upon it. He went to the largely Indian elected Central Legislative Assembly and asked the Secretary of the Indian Assembly, Motilal Nehru whether or not the Assembly would allow Burma to split away. Nehru was not against the Burmese gaining partial legislative recognition from the government of India, however was fundamentally opposed to Burma splitting itself from British India entirely. However, when the motion was first raised in the Central Legislative Assembly on the 7th of July, 1921, the All India Muslim League and the Nationalist Party led by Mohammad Ali Jinnah and Madan Mohan Malaviya, in a rare occasion of agreeing with one another voted in favor of allowing Burma to split off as a new colony within the British Empire. Jinnah in particular had no interest in Burma, with its negligible muslim and Islamic population, and Malaviya believed in a ‘true’ Indian state, and did not want ethnicities such as the Burmese whom he believed to be non-Indian to remain in India. As a result, the two parties, which combined, held more seats than the Indian National Congress in the Assembly outvoted the INC in that matter. Most of the Independents and a fair amount of Europeans in the assembly had also been elected through Burma’s constituencies, and they too voted in favor of splitting the colony away from the British Raj. On the 28th of July, 1921, the decision was conveyed to London that the Raj had voted to split Burma as a separate colony.

    1627650115535.png

    Flag of British Burma

    Viscount Peel, the Secretary of State for India was not exactly enthused with the idea, however Chamberlain, as Prime Minister was more open to the idea. He knew the economic difficulties of Burma, and allowing decentralization of the local colonial economy was in his book, a favor to the British Empire’s economy. Indeed most calculations will ascertain that the British saved an excess of more than 1.1 million pounds every year after the colony of Burma was split off from British India. As a result, Chamberlain and the cabinet accepted the decision and on December 23, 1921, the flag of the British Raj was taken down in Burma and the flag of British Burma was flown marking ‘National Day’ in Burmese society. Now that partial self-rule was achieved in Burma, the nationalistic parties and groups in Burma began campaigning for a legislature elected for Burma by the Burmese. The Burmese Home Rule Movement had started.” Britain in Burma © 2019

    ***

    “Amid the turmoil of the War of 1877-78 in the Balkan Peninsula, a group of young Jewish journalists and philanthropists left Salonika and journeyed via Le Havre all the way to New York City. These Jews were called the Turkinos, the Jewish citizens of the United States of America that originated from the Ottoman Empire. One particular Turkinos would later write in the New York Times that ‘Blessed America was rife with people that worked hard day and night. While life was peaceful in Beautiful Turkey, anti-Semitism and scum reign in the emergent nations of Serbia, Greece and Bulgaria’ the man wrote. This man was Soulam Xanthos, an Ottoman Greek Jew who had lived in Salonika all his life before the threat of Russian occupation forced his family to emigrate. Soulam, when writing under the pseudonym of Selaniki wrote that he was fundamentally a Jewish Friend of the Masses and in the end, a True Ottoman. He stated that he had no other identity than being fully Ottoman and nothing else.

    In 1918, when the United States Immigration Restriction Act under President Hughes came into effect, the American government listed than from 1878 to 1915, around 60,000 Ottoman Jews had immigrated from the Ottoman Empire to the United States of America. Unlike most European immigrants however, who were eager to shed their European identities, the Ottoman Jews, they found, mostly clung on to their Ottoman identity. These Turkinos were joined by around 20,000 Muslim immigrants from the Ottoman Empire as well. The Turkinos were decidedly a minority within the 2 million Jewish population of the USA, which was more or less made up of only Ashkenazi Jews from Eastern Europe, which became the face of mainstream American Jewry. The Turkinos, unlike their Ashkenazi cousins, however also showed a lot of cultural differences, speaking either Sephardic/Ladino or Yiddish as their Jewish tongue and the majority of them knew how to speak in either Turkish, Greek or Arabic.


    1627650169927.png

    A Turkino family in New Jersey circa 1920

    Turkinos first came to the forefront of American press life, when in 1911-12 the Ottomans defended Libya from an Italian invasion. Italian Americans, in nationalistic fervor attacked an Ottoman sector in New York City, razing a miniature mosque to the ground. The New York Times reported for the first time in American history about the Turkinos. The name itself was attributed by the American press to the Tanzimat Reforms of 1832 – 1876, which had tried and with mixed results had created an Ottoman Identity. Strinkingly contrast to many ethnic groups who immigrated to America, they remained hesitant to shed their Ottoman identity. During the Balkan War of 1915, Ottoman Turkinos raised around 1200 pounds and sent it to the Ottoman Empire as donation to the military effort of the Ottoman Empire during the war. A small sum compared to the hundreds of thousands that were churning in Ottoman industrial estates but the gesture did not hurt at all, and received a good deal of publicity from the American press as well.

    However, after 1915, the Ottoman and American governments noticed a growing trend that was good for the Ottomans. In 1916, 300 Turkinos departed from the USA and landed onto the shores of Constantinople. The number rose to 621 in 1917, 803 in 1918, 1,102 in 1919 and 1,198 in 1920. The Turkinos were returning home. This was due to a variety of reasons. The growing Ottoman economy certainly aided for incentive, and the Ottomans declaring and enforcing protection of its Jewish minority was certainly an added bonus as well. But more importantly, it was also a variety of issues in America that influenced the Turkinos to return back to their homeland. The rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the American South increased anti-semitism in the south, as Turkinos in the South were attacked and lynched in anti-semitic attacks. During the 2nd Filipino-American War, the Jews were targeted by anti-Semites as ‘slackers’ and ‘war-profiteers’ and US army manuals published for war volunteers and recruits stated that ‘The Foreign Born, and especially the Jews, are more apt to malinger than the native-born’ [3]. Similarly, after the trial and lynching of Leo Frank in 1913, the media and press in the United States had turned over to a dangerous anti-semitic streak which was dangerous by all standards of the day. Furthermore, looking at the Turkinos with rose tinted orientalism and general oriental discrimination also served as another factor. With things becoming better in the homeland, the Ottoman Jews in America were more than happy to return back home as they saw it.

    Furthermore, the return of the Turkinos attracted the attention of other people. German born Jewish attorney, Sigmund Livingstone, who founded and chaired as the first president of the Anti-Defamation League was in particular intrigued by the returning Jewish populace. Certainly Jewish immigrants returning back home from America was something that hadn’t been particularly seen before. As a result, Livingstone applied for a travel permit into the Ottoman Empire through the Ottoman Diplomatic Office in Washington DC. He was granted his permit and with a Turkino family that he knew, boarded the Gazi Osman in New York on the 13th of July, 1921 to journey to the Ottoman Empire. In Salonika after two months, he joined up with David Ben-Gurion, who was happy to meet the German Jew, and founded the Turkino Returning Office (TRO) which was founded on the basis of aiding the returning Turkinos monetarily and financially. More importantly they also managed to appeal to the Ottoman government to receive generous grants and loans from the Ministry of Financial Affairs as well.


    1627650218599.png

    Sigmund Livingstone

    The returning Turkinos did however complicate Ottoman-American relations. American smugglers were eager to bypass the Ottoman Protectionist System and smuggle excess Turkish Tobacco and Ottoman Diamonds from the Ottoman Empire back to America, where they could sell them at exuberant prices, basically filling themselves with enough monetary gain to last them through decades. In 1921 alone, 286 American foreign nationals in the Ottoman Empire was jailed on the allegation of smuggling. 39 of them were released later after being found innocent of the charges, however the rest were imprisoned after finding them guilty. The Ottoman Empire was becoming caught up in America’s smuggling and gang wars, as gang smugglers tried to smuggle and were imprisoned for it within the Ottoman Empire. Relations between the Ottoman Empire and America nosedived in late 1921, when a certain Enoch L. Johnson was captured in Constantinople trying to shore up his bootlegging and prostitution racket by importing ‘exotic’ prostitutes and alcohol. Despite his gangsterism being an open secret, he was a public face in the American country and his imprisonment served to make Ottoman-American relations much colder after 1921. It was an unfortunate by-product of what was a fortunate rise in Ottoman tolerance of the Jews.” The Ottoman Jews of America © 2020

    ***

    “In 1551, the people of Tripoli demanded that they be saved from Spanish rule by the Ottoman Sultan, the Caliph and the Custodian of the Two Holy Cities. In conformity with that demand, Tripoli, and as a result, Tripolitania became Ottoman in the following year. However, the region, much like the rest of Ottoman North Africa was ruled autonomously by regional oligarchs. In 1711, one oligarchic family, the Karamanlis became the strongest, and undisputed leaders of Ottoman Tripolitania. In 1835, they were overthrown by the Ottoman Government under the initiation of Tripolitanian rebels, who asked the sultan to bring absolute rule back to the region after the Karamanlis turned increasingly despotic and elitist in nature, suppressing the rather free nature of Tripoli before that. After defeating Abd-al Jalil, Askar Ali Pasha restored Tripolitania and Libya to absolute Ottoman rule. However, since then, the region had been neglected and overlooked by Ottoman policy makers and Ottoman bureaucrats who were far more interested in Arabia, Anatolia and the Balkans.

    However ,the Italo-Ottoman War of 1911 had changed all of that. The Ottomans knew of the strategic position of Libya in the central Mediterranean Region and the economic benefit of having a growing economic and demographically balanced province. Libya, became a sort of economic testing ground for the Ottomans after 1911 as a result. Much of the land reform policies, and industrial incentives were tried and tested in Libya, though on a much smaller scale. The government of Ali Kemal had been particularly focused on Libya, however Riza had arguably been negligent of the non-contiguous province of the Ottoman Empire. Other than the cities of Tripoli, Benghazi and Tobruk, Ottoman Libya was a poor country, wasted around by years of negligence, and though the construction of railways was increasing commercial values of the Ottoman Empire within the region, it lagged behind the other regions of the Empire by a fair bit. However since 1889 Ottoman governors in Libya had seen the rise of a provincial elite and had complained back to government in Constantinople about it. Abdul Hamid II could care less about it and the government in Constantinople after 1912 was too elated by their victory to do anything about it.

    The Suf Clan of Tripoli, the Aziziyyah clan in Fezzan, and the Ka’abhar family in Cyrenaica were all three dominating oligarchic and elitist families in Ottoma Libya that traced their oligarchic origins all the way back to the Ottoman-Tripolitanian War of 1835. And even though the Karamanlis had been deposed in 1835, they remained politically important within the city of Tripoli at least. This was exemplified in the fact that the mayor of the city was Hassuna Pasha Qaramanli from 1891 to 1909. These political notables were hoarding the economic wealth of the province, and was starting to leech of the people. Furthermore, nomadic tribes in the interior of Ottoman Libya refused to register themselves, complicating the taxation process within the province as well. On the initiation of Avraam Benaroya, the Economics Minister, who had partial Libyan origins himself, the government of Riza finally decided to look into the direction of the Libyans in 1921.

    The Ottoman government knew just how devastating losing a province to a total oligarchic alliance would be, having been at the receiving ends of such families for the past 400 years. As a result, the Ottomans were now focusing on diligently removing said oligarchs from power. However, the government would have to be subtle about it. If they didn’t, then the oligarchs could easily rally some paid tribes to create economic and military damage in the province, prompting the imperial powers and Italy to try and intervene to ‘restore order’. Due to this cautious strategy the Ottomans turned to the 1921 Tripoli Mayoral Elections and the 1921 Benghazi Mayoral Elections to try and gain a better foothold against oligarchs in the province.


    1627650318662.png

    Henry Felix Woods, known as Woods Pasha in the Ottoman Empire

    The 1921 Tripoli Mayoral Elections were slated to be held on the 21st of October, 1921. The incumbent, Mohammad Al-Suf, a member of the Suf clan was going to be challenged by a CUP party member, Youseff Al-Dhami. On the 10th of December, 1921, the Benghazi Mayoral Elections were about to be held, where incumbent Ahmed Al-Kha’bar was going to be challenged by Woods Pasha, a member of the Liberal Union Party. Woods Pasha, or by his personal name, Henry Felix Woods was a dual Ottoman-British citizen who had taken towards politics after retiring from the Royal Navy in 1916. He would be the first foreigner with the Pasha title to go on to hold political office in Ottoman history. The Ottoman government decided to fund these challenges to the oligarchic families. Though at first Riza was loathe to support a CUP party member for Tripoli, he reluctantly agreed. The Oligarchs were rich, and powerful, however their wealth paled in front of the wealth of a nation that was also a minor great power. The Ottoman government funded the campaign of Youseff Al-Dhami by a great deal, giving him tax breaks as well to make sure his financial situation remained strong. The government also used subtle measures, such as not allowing campaign addresses from Mohammad Al-Suf to be spread during the run-up to the elections. This was dirty and flouting rules of democracy at times, however in order to remove authoritarian oligarchism, the Ottoman government believed it was worth it. Much to the surprise the Suf clan, during the 1921 Tripoli Mayoral Election, Al-Dhami managed to win the title of Mayor with an extremely small margin and a majority of ~1,100 votes. In particular, the Kurdish and Turkish population of the city had swung the votes in favor of Al-Dhami.

    1 election.PNG

    2 election.PNG

    The Kha’bar clan was rivalled by the Suf clan, and as a result, the Kha’bar family did not take any lessons from the loss in October. When it was time for the election in Benghazi, the Ottomans funded Woods Pasha heavily, and town speakers spoke and sang praises of Woods Pasha, and his service in the Ottoman Navy. In particular Woods Pasha’s supporters lambasted that incumbent Ahmed Al-Kha’bar had been ‘absent’ during the Italo-Ottoman War, and as a result of stoking nationalistic egos, and the massive funding of the Ottoman state, Woods Pasha won a ~3,800 majority over Ahmed Al-Kha’bar and rose to become the Mayor of Benghazi, being the first foreigner with the title Pasha to hold a political position within the Ottoman Empire.

    As such, the slow political destruction of the oligarchs in Libya for economic development began under the auspices of the Ottoman government.” Libya in the Ottoman Empire: A Long History © 2018
    ---
    ***

    Footnotes:-

    [1] – UAE otl

    [2] – OTl quote

    [3] – true quote from the 1916 us army manual.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 48: Political Changes
  • Osman Reborn

    Chapter 48: Political Changes

    ***

    “On the 2nd of January, 1922, the Ottoman Empire’s electoral commission gave the government the date of March 12, 1922 as the date of the new Senatorial and General Elections, which were going to be held together in tandem for the first time in Ottoman Electoral History. As a result, all of the major parties began to gear up for the new electoral campaign that was going to arrive within the next three months. It was obvious for anyone to see that the Ottoman Empire was at the crossroads. For the past eight years, the Committee of Union and Progress had ruled the Ottoman Empire alongside the Socialist Party, and their rule was once again being challenged by the Liberal Union, which under the leadership of Mustafa Kemal Pasha, was making a comeback in the electoral scene having won several governorship and mayoral elections since 1918 to increase their power over the local government. The Ottoman Empire’s economy was also growing and the now developing country needed to make new political decisions.


    1627810486009.png

    Ottoman Elections were extremely competitive

    Soon after the elections dates were announced, party manifestos were released to the public by the respective political parties. The CUP Manifesto ‘It’s the Economy People’ was focused on the economy, and its growth which had been extremely healthy under the rule of Riza and the Committee of Union and Progress. The Manifesto promised that the new government under the CUP would continue to look into matters of increased funding for transportation, infrastructure and the industrial heart of the Ottoman Empire. In contrast, the Liberal Union’s manifesto, which was named ‘The Happy Ottoman’ took a radical turn from previous party lines, as the Kemalist faction within the party turned towards liberal-progressivism as well as statism as their main ideology. In the manifesto, the Liberal Union promised that a balanced budgeting system would be introduced, and that the creation of a welfare state, based on the British and Scandinavian Countries would take place in the country, with new incentives for education, health and commerce in the country. It also unveiled a mild scholarship scheme to make sure that the Ottomans could appeal to foreign students as well. The Socialist Party under the other hand, had seen a change in leadership, with Huseyin Hilmi leaving his political career to enjoy a career in Turkish and Arabic literature. In his stead, came the dynamic peasant-agrarian leader, Safik Husni. Husni’s Manifesto, which was named ‘The Social Manifesto’ promised nationalization, future economic planning and full employment as well as a system of social security in the future. The Big Three, as the CUP, Liberal Union and the Ottoman Socialists were called during this era, had made sure that with their manifestos, the elections would remain contentious and highly competitive.

    With the correction of major issues in Ottoman franchise and population data collecting in 1920, the Ottoman Empire’s franchise had expanded once again, and 23 million people within the empire was eligible to vote. This shifted political populism and its dynamics within the empire by a great deal, and vowed to make the elections an unknown quality for all parties involved. Mustafa Kemal Pasha led the Liberal Union during the 1922 Elections. He defined his goals for the country as ‘Liberal Populism, Reformism, Ottomanism, and Statism’. The Liberal Union thoroughly rejected class conflict, as defined by socialists, syndicalists and communists in the country and instead believed, in line with their idea of Ottomanism, that national unity was needed above all else. This was emphasized by Mustafa Kemal and the party members during their campaign for the elections throughout the country. While Ottomanism was de-facto already applied policy, none of the former governments had actually explicitly stated that they were in favor of Ottomanism trying to co-opt the ethnic minorities of the country. Mustafa Kemal changed this policy line. In a speech in Constantinople he stated, ‘I do not intend to take away your language, your culture, your religion, your customs and traditions. You can be a Bulgarian, Greek, Turk, Arab, Albanian, Armenian, however at the same time, you can also be an Ottoman’. Ottomanism became the ideological approach to transcend differences of community and nationality in the Ottoman Empire, and certainly to the liberal thinking population of the Empire, it was an enticing opinion and ideological belief. More importantly, Ottomanism was explicitly called by Abdulmejid I of the Empire as an approach based on reason, logic and common sense, and so in a roundabout way, the Liberal Union was promoting reason and logic as their main populist message as well. Economically the party was heavily influenced by the Liberal Party of the UK, and promised that something akin to the UK Liberal Reforms of 1906-1915, which had created the British welfare state would also take place within the Ottoman Empire. They also derided the fact that the Ottoman Empire did not have minimum wage policies, and did not have family allowance securities, and promised that increased spending in the welfare of the population would take place. A very ambitious scholarship scheme, based on a new school curriculum was also devised and spread throughout the public by the Liberal Union.


    1627810561942.png

    Mustafa Kemal Pasha

    The CUP was facing problems however, based on the fact that the country was going through political fatigue. Despite the fact that the CUP led government had done wonders for the country in the past eight years, having the same governments for nearly a decade led to severe political tiredness and fatigue in the country aimed at the CUP. This was a problem for the party that was nearly insurmountable. Ahmet Riza himself was not well, and interned in hospital for several days which severely stunted the campaigning policy of the party as well. The problem in the country was that Riza himself was extremely well respected, and had high approval ratings, however the same could not be said for the party, as political tiredness took hold of the country. As a result, the party hurriedly based their campaign on the promise of continuing the vast economic reforms of the country. This was partially successful and the party also appealed to the conservative side of the female voting populace, and allowed themselves to be ingratiated within their electoral clique as well. Similarly, led by Husni the Ottoman Socialist Party was scouring the country looking for votes. The increasing industrialization of the Ottoman Empire meant that there was a growing class of workers and socialists in the country, and the party sought to advantage of this fact. Husni promised several economic reforms, such as nationalization of several industrial estates and the creation of a central state supervised planning center for the national economy as well. He also promised for social reforms, and appealing to the Christian minorities of the country, he also promised to reduce the power of the still powerful Ulema in the country. He was attacked by islamists throughout the election due to this campaign policy in particular.

    The Ottoman Democratic Party led by their new Greek leader, Kozmidi Effendi, had slowly turned from liberalism to centrism. Kozmidi had correctly assumed that the relation of liberalism of the Democratic Party and the Liberal Union leeched votes from the Democratic Party to the Liberal Union, which was highly effective in lowering the parliamentary representation of the country. Kozmidi as a result, decided that he would opt for a more centrist outlook for the party. Kozmidi argued in the public that the party was basing itself as a fiscally conservative and socially liberal party. Kozmidi based his policy outlook on trying to make sure that deficit funding in the Ottoman Empire was unnecessary and unlikely to take hold. He also promised to cut income taxes and to increase commercial funding as well, and made a compelling case, and the Ottoman Democratic Party managed to regain Albania as a powerbase after their loss in 1918. Similarly, the Social Democratic Party under the new leadership of Hamdi Bey also found themselves rising in popularity Ottoman Arabia with their more pro-religion outlook. Ottoman Arabia had been undergoing slow but gradual industrialization and had increased their working class as well. However, unlike the socialists who adopted an ambiguous religious policy, the Social Democrats engaged in pre-religion policies as well. Their policy of state regulation, was also in line with traditional Arabic economic policies, and as a result Iraq, in particular, the Baghdad Region, became a Social Democratic stronghold. Hamdi Bey, being Arabic himself, also focused largely on trying to bring the Arabs under his political sphere during the entire elections.

    With the collapse of the Armenian Regionalist Party in 1921 after Armen Garo died, and the factions of the party splintered off, a new contender rose to take the charge as well. Led by powerful and influential Husrev Bey, the Ottoman Progressive Party had arrived on the scene. The Progressive Party’s motto was ‘Corporatism, Technocracy, Progress’ and their policies directly reflected this. In their manifesto and campaign which was named ‘For a Progressive Empire’, the party was fiercely pro-corporate, pro-technocracy, and pro-progressivism. The party based their economic policy on the growing service and corporate sector and tried to appeal the service workers of the empire, which worked extremely well, as several corporatists defected from several other parties to their party. They also espoused traditional progressivism which leeched votes from the Socialists into the Progressives as well. However more intriguingly, the new ideology which was coined as Technocracy by Calfornian Engineer William Henry Smyth, was an ideology that the party supported. Within this context, their supported the means to gain industrial democracy and to gain government that was ruled by technical decision making, which the party believed would be the best rule to follow governmental decisions by. Several high ranking engineers, economists, and bureaucrats joining the party ensured that unlike other new parties, it would start strong even in the first general election they contested. The Ottoman Nationalist Party led by Enver Pasha and the Poale Zion Party started to flounder during the elections however, and with the CUP taking the conservative vote, and ethno-centrist politics collapsing in the Ottoman Empire, as the empire’s political sphere matured, both party’s found their support cratering throughout the empire. Enver Pasha’s radical Turkish nationalist and pan-Turanist ideologies certainly did not help matters either, and members of minorities such as the Kurds, Arabs, Lebanites, Greeks, Armenians etc outright refused to listen to his turanist ideas in what they reminded him, was a multi-ethnic empire of equals.


    1.png

    When the ballots were counted on the 15th of March, 1922, the Liberal Union had won the largest share of seats in both the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, (though their share of seats in the Senate decreased), and as a result, the Liberal Union formed a new minority government. The Ottoman Democratic Party promised to provide confidence and supply to the new government as well, and after a contingent election, the Liberal leader, Mustafa Kemal Pasha was elected to be the new Grand Vizier. After the elections were over, Sultan Abdulmejid II would invite Mustafa Kemal to his palace, where he would formally be granted the title of Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire. Immediately after this, the new Grand Vizier would look to make a functioning new cabinet for the empire. He appointed Mustafa Fehvzi Pasha as the new Minister of the Army and Airforce, whilst Mehmet Ihsan Bey was appointed as the Minister of the Navy. The Ottoman Greek politician, Emmanuil Emmanuilidis was chosen by Mustafa Kemal as the Minister of Interior by the new Grand Vizier. Emmanuilidis was extremely talented as an administrator, and his skills was required by the new ministry as far as Mustafa Kemal was concerned. A far more controversial cabinet placement was the appointment of Faisal Al-Hashemi, the son of Hussein bin Ali, the Grand Sharif of Mecca as the Minister of Foreign Affairs. However, as Faisal was elected as a deputy for Jeddah he was theoretically allowed to hold a cabinet position and his candidacy passed. Faris Al-Huri was chosen as the Minister of Justice, being a jurist and lawyer previously, and Dikran Barsamian was chosen as the Minister of Agriculture. An Armenian botanist and agrarian scientist, Mustafa Kemal was sitting in line with his populist and statist ideology and had chosen Barsamian on the basis of his reformist and proto-technocratic ideology. Historian Pavlos Karolidis was chosen as the Minister of Education and Selim Ali Selam Bey, the former mayor of Beirut, was chosen as the Minister of the Economy. Finally Mustafa Fefvzi Sarhan Bey was chosen as the Minister of Pious Affairs, and Minas Cheraz was chosen as the Minister of Health whilst Lufti Fikri Bey was chosen as the Minister of Social Security and Labour.

    NameCabinet PositionPartyEthnicity
    Mustafa Kemal PashaPrime MinisterLiberal Union (LU)Turkish
    Mustafa Fefvzi PashaMinister of the Army and AirforceIndependentTurkish
    Mehmet Ihsan BeyMinister of the NavyIndependentTurkish
    Emmanuil EmmanuilidisMinister of the InteriorLUGreek
    Faisal Al-HashemiMinister of Foreign AffairsIndependentArab
    Faris Al-HuriMinister of JusticeLUArab
    Dikran BarsamianMinister of AgricultureLUArmenian
    Pavlas KarolidisMinister of EducationLUGreek
    Selim Al Selam BeyMinister of Economic, Financial, Trade, Commercial and Industrial AffairsPro-LU IndependentArab
    Mustafa Fefzvi Sarhan BeyMinister of Pious AffairsLUTurko-Arab
    Minas CherazMinister of HealthLUArmenian
    Lufti Fikri BeyMinister of Social Security and LabourLUTurko-Arab


    As the new cabinet and government came to power, Mustafa Kemal Pasha would begin compiling bills to fulfill his promise of a liberal welfare state in the Ottoman Empire. It would be the first real start of the Ottoman Welfare State.” Ottoman Electoral History 1920 – 1930 © 1997

    ***

    “From 1861 to 1890, the Qing Dynasty had tried to modernize themselves, and certainly they had put up a good fight in the Sino-French War of 1884, and had scared Europe in its entirety with their modernization efforts in that war. However despite performing admirably during the First Sino-Japanese War [1], the Chinese had been destroyed in the war, and the Boxer Rebellion and the subsequent Great Power intervention had ended all hopes of trying to modernize the Qing Dynasty. That had directly led to the Xinhai Revolution and the fall of the Qing Dynasty. Nevertheless with the rise of the Chinese Empire under the Chinese Dynasty (中國王朝), Yuan Keding’s Dynastic House, the country was trying to move forward and modernize once again.


    1627810664245.png

    Yuan Keding, the Hongxian Emperor

    Yuan Keding, or the Hongxian Emperor was eager to modernize China, and the victory he had received over the republican and pro-Qing loyalists had given him courage to chug along with new reforms in the Chinese Empire. In this endeavor he was aided by Prime Minister Tang Shaoyi. Tang was a highly educated man, having attended elementary school in Springfield, Massachusetts, high school in Hartford, Connecticut, and then earning certificates by getting his undergraduate degree in the Queen’s College of Hong Kong and his graduate degree in the Columbia University in New York. He was highly educated, and widely respected in common Chinese society. However other elements in Chinese society were starting to act against the Imperial government.

    1627810691135.png

    Guo Songling

    Governors in China were basically warlords, and acting at the behest of the central government if they so pleased. They controlled the regional armies, and the regional economies, and their interference was one of the reasons why the first imperial elections had such a low turnout. To bring them into line, the Hongxian Emperor bribed several prominent warlords, and using their support, he nationalized and centralized the Chinese Imperial Army. This however, proved to be the tipping point for arch-reactionaries and warlords who did not like the centralizing authority of the Hongxian Emperor. Led by the Governor-General of Manchuria, Guo Songling, several dissatisfied warlords of China met in Harbin to discuss strategy to make sure they could preserve their own local power within the Chinese realm. The Harbin Conference of January 8, 1922, consisted of:-

    Guo Songling: Governor of Manchuria
    Duan Qirui: Governor of Anhui
    Yan Xishan: Governor of Shanxi
    Tang Jiyao: Governor of Yunnan
    Lu Rongting: Governor of Guandong
    Liu Xiang: Governor of Sichuan
    Demchugdongrub (Prince De): Governor of Inner Mongolia

    The seven members of the conference decided that the Imperial Government was overstepping the bounds of its authority and had broken the ‘gentleman’s agreement’ between the Warlords and the central government which had held the Empire together for so long. They decided that they would band together, and before the deadline of March 31, 1922 to centralize control of the army, would wage war against the central government, depose the Emperor, and restore a republican rule which was ruled by oligarchs and warlords for the interests of oligarchs and warlords. Prince De received affirmation of the autonomy of Inner Mongolia in the case of restored republican rule. After this was agreed upon, the warlords returned to their respective provinces, and began to prepare for the war they knew was about to come. On the 25th of February, 1922, the Governor of Manchuria, Guo Songling declared the Imperial government illegitimate and then soon one by one, Anhui, Shanxi, Sichuan, Guandong, Yunnan and Inner Mongolia followed soon after and they all raised their armies against the Imperial government. This was the start of the Chinese Civil War.

    2.PNG

    Factions of the Chinese Civil War
    Green is the Imperial Government of the Empire of China, Red is the Warlord Alliance and Purple is the Provisional Republic of China

    Further problems arose for the Imperial government as they tried to formulate a proper response when Sun-Yat Sen’s successor in Shanghai, Zhang Renjie also rose up in support of a republican regime, forming a third side to the civil war, where he declared the Provisional Republic of China. Jiangsu and Zhejiang aligned themselves with the Provisional Republic as well further strengthening this third side. Ironically for the Imperial government, conquered territories in Xinjiang and Tibet remained loyal to the central government and sided with them whilst the rest of the country sided with the Imperial government as well. This situation meant that the country was now truly embroiled in civil war. Millions were being raised as the Empire and its opposition began to form against one another.

    It was to this end that the Hongxian Emperor and Prime Minister Tang knew that diplomacy would play an important role in the conflict to come. For years the government had been needling the British, American, French and Japanese governments that a formal treaty that protected the territorial sovereignty of China was needed. The civil war provided the Chinese government with the opportunity to do as such. Finally recognizing the threat to Asian stability that a full Chinese civil war showed, the governments of the respective countries finally agreed to a treaty. The 5 Power Treaty as it was called was signed in Honolulu, Hawaii, the USA, between the government of the Chinese Empire, United Kingdom, United States, French Republic and Japanese Empire. The 5 Power Treaty stipulated that:-


    • Article [1] stipulated that the Empire of China was the legal government of China
    • Article [2-4] stipulated that the sovereignty, independence and territorial and administrative integrity of China was to be respected by all signing and collaborating powers.
    • Article [5] stipulated that all powers would remain neutral in the civil war raging in China.
    • Article [6-8] stipulated that China would agree to the diplomatic, economic and societal of all foreign powers in China.
    • Article [8-10] highlighted a few trading agreements between China and the signing powers.
    1627810795762.png

    Signing of the 5 Power Treaty

    The treaty was signed on the 31st of March, 1922, and the country having resolved a diplomatic facet of war, turned their attention to actually bringing the petty warlords back to heel. Furthermore, the Imperial Chinese government wished to make sure that it had a steady supply of war materials to fund their side of the Chinese Civil War. For 3 years, Imperial China had been increasing their diplomatic maneuvers with the Ottoman Empire, having recognized first the potential of the healing Empire of Osman. As countries targeted by Western Imperialism, the two countries had friendly relations with one another. On the 27th of March, 1922, the Ottoman Ambassador to the Chinese Emperor, Ahmed Hulusi Fuad Pasha was summoned to the Hongxian Emperor. Fuad Pasha was asked to relay a message to the Ottoman government asking for a trading and armament agreement between Beijing and Constantinople. This was relayed to Constantinople by Fuad Pasha via the Chinese Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, Peng Chun Chang, who presented the telegraphed message to the new Grand Vizier, Mustafa Kemal Pasha on the 4th of April, 1922. Negotiations between the two empires for a deal would soon start thereafter.” The Chinese Civil War © 2019

    ***

    “The end of the Mexican Revolution heralded a new era for the Mexicans, and the country and the world knew it. It was time for the country to sit back and recuperate, as it were. Carranza was eager to make sure that a stable succession of power took place in the 1922 Federal General Elections. During the elections, Carranza endorsed the candidacy of Ignacio Bonillas for the ruling party, the Liberal Constitutional Party. The Liberal Constitutional Party was a Center-Left political party that was in favor of the labour and populist movement of Mexico. Ignacio in particular was a moderate candidate and a person, who was extremely capable and competent. Carranza was of the opinion that Ignacio ascending to the position of President would be extremely beneficial to the Mexican Republic. This candidacy was challenged by Pablo Gonzalez Garza and Alvaro Obregon, both of whom had military backgrounds. Carranza feared that in the case of Ignacio’s victory, both generals would try to conduct a coup to let themselves come to power. Thankfully this opinion and worry seems to have been for naught.


    3.png

    During the 1922 Mexican Federal and General Elections, the Liberal Constitutional Party won 53.2% of the votes, and Ignacio Bonillas managed to ascend to the presidency quite easily, with neither Garza nor Obregon trying to conduct a coup against Ignacio, despite their displeasure at losing the elections. Ignacio’s presidency came at a good time. The American-Mexican border was rife with cross-border attacks between mercenaries and the remnants of the northern Mexican warlords. Tensions between the American and Mexican government were high due to the cross border raids and battles. The last attack had been in El Paso, Texas in early 1922, and Ignacio thoroughly denounced the attack, and asked President Hughes for a summit and diplomatic conference to make sure that the porous Mexican-American border was once again safe and secure once again. President Hughes would agree to a meeting, and the two would meet with one another in El Paso, to discuss trading agreements and securing the border with one another.

    However Ignacio, being a former Ambassador to the US from Mexico, knew more than anyone else how heavy handed American Economic Imperialism could be, having seen its effects in Haiti and Saint Domingo, and as a result, he retained his distance from the American government, though he remained outwardly friendly with them. Nearly half of all foreign trade conducted by the Mexican government was controlled by the American government, and as a result, the Depression of 1914 to 1916 had utterly wrecked the economic stability of Mexico and its effects were still being felt much to the horror of the government. Therefore the government of Mexico was trying to counteract against the American domination of the Mexican economy. The Mexicans sent out peace feelers for economic rights, trade and commerce to other great and regional powers such as Britain, France, Spain, Brazil and more importantly as well, the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire’s aid to the Mexican Constitutionalists had been extremely lucrative during the Mexican Revolution and the role of Djevat Pasha, who had trained the Mexican Army was not forgotten in Mexico City either. As such, the Mexican government was eager to create and foster new relations with the Ottoman Empire. Official diplomats were exchanged for the first time and consulates were opened as well. The Mexicans were interested in the hard cash that the Ottomans could invest into the Mexican economy and the Ottomans were interested in the oil industry of Mexico, which produced the second highest amount of oil at the time.


    1627810873539.png

    Mexican Oil Fields

    As the Mexican government started to nationalize oil companies after the 1917 constitution was amended and ratified, this provided the Ottoman Empire with the perfect opportunity to start and create investment schemes in the Mexican oil industry. Only America and Britain really had any real stakes in the Mexican oil industry and the Ottoman government intended to change this matter. The Ottoman-Mexican Trading and Commercial Agreement of 1922 opened the floodgates in Mexico for Ottoman investment, whilst the Ottoman government received Mexican oil at favored and discounted prices as well. The Ottoman government also influenced politics heavily and backed the Liberal Constitutionalist Party, and granted several sovereign aid to the party through the means of private donors. This increased goodwill and cooperation between Mexico City and Constantinople led to increased interest in the small Muslim community in Mexico. Only ~1500 people strong, the muslims of Mexico were almost all merchants and diplomats from the Ottoman Empire, French North Africa, British Africa, British India and British Malaya. The first real mosque in Mexico City, Juan Escutia Mosque in Mexico City was built on the initiation of Ottoman money during this time, as Mexican-ottoman relations grew warmer everyday.

    1627810939511.png

    The Mexican government under Ignacio supported the Central American project

    Furthermore, Ignacio also supported the Central American project which was chugging along every day as the presidents of various central American countries met each other every month or so to try and speed along the process of uniting the countries. This new system of correspondence and friendliness with all would go on to define Mexican policy for a long time.” Mexico in the Aftermath of the Revolution © 1992

    ***

    [1] – Hint hint.
     
    Chapter 49: The Anglo-Ottoman Alliance
  • Osman Reborn

    Chapter 49: The Anglo-Ottoman Alliance

    ***

    “To an extent, the Ottoman welfare state had its basis in the Tanzimat Reforms of Abdulmejid I, Mahmud II and Abdulaziz. They all extended education, increased health services and security throughout the empire in their bid to increase the development of the empire. This process was killed however during the reign of Abdul Hamid II, and found itself accelerated when in 1909 Abdulhamid II was deposed from the throne forever. The rise of constitutionalism in the empire was a good thing, for it allowed increased investments into the welfare sector to take place, however in some levels it was inadequate, as the Ottoman empire still lagged behind Europe in several criteria of welfare, such as infant mortality, total educational worth, etc, and the new liberal government of the Ottoman Empire had come to power promising to change this. The new Grand Vizier, Mustafa Kemal Pasha was ardent in his belief that the foundations for a new welfare state would take place under his guidance and the guidance of his cabinet.

    After the elections in early 1922, which propelled Mustafa Kemal Pasha to the Grand Viziership, Mustafa Kemal Pasha had directed all his energy and the energy of most of his cabinet to new economic reforms which would build the slate for a welfare country in the Ottoman Empire. The Reform Package of June, 1922 as it was called then had four major acts packed in them. They were: -


    • The People’s Tax
    • The Children Acts
    • The Old Age Acts
    • The Workers Acts
    The People’s Tax was a taxation that was aimed at produce that were necessary but harming the health condition of the empire. Ever since the semi-secularization of the Ottoman Empire, drinking and the creation of pubs had expanded and exploded by almost fivefold, which was a problem, because as the alcohol industry expanded by fivefold, alcohol related accidents, and deaths also increased by fivefold. Pharmaceutical drugs were also being smuggled into the public sphere for activities which were most decidedly not related to pharmaceutical activities either, and this had irritated the health industry of the Ottoman Empire for quite some time, as alcohol and drug related deaths had increased in the empire by almost 4 times since 1908. The new Minister of Health, Minas Cheraz, who had been exiled by Abdul Hamid II and asked to return by Abdulmejid II was a prominent activist in favor of reform against alcohol and drugs. Many in the empire had believed that the legislation being discussed was aimed at against the Christian and Jewish minorities of the Empire, as the Muslims of the empire consumed much less alcohol than their Christian and Jewish counterparts, however Cheraz, an Armenian Coptic Christian himself, took the front stage as he campaigned against what he called, a grave problem for the empire. He proposed the People’s Tax, which put heavy fines and taxes on alcohol and drugs throughout the empire, making their economic viability in the empire much less sustainable. With the Liberal Union having a popular mandate in the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate, this act, which was met with stiff resistance from many in the CUP and surprisingly the Socialists, passed when the Social Democrats and Progressives voted in favor of the act. Stiff alcoholic and drug regulations were imposed, and times for pubs were reduced as well.

    1627975885008.png

    Minas Cheraz, the Ottoman Health Minister

    The Children Acts passed through 3 major reforms into the Ottoman Empire. With the growing surplus in Ottoman agricultural yields, the Free Meal Act passed through the Chamber of Deputies and demanded that all governmental schools, which constituted 80% of all schools in the Ottoman Empire, provide free meals to their students. During the Balkan War, undernourishment and illness among the civilian volunteers from the student class had been noted whilst making this act as well. Furthermore, minimum standards for food were included to make sure that the students of the empire were not receiving undernourishment from their schools. The Empire also passed several regulations, such as the creation of the National School Board to make sure that regulations and legislations were being properly implemented. The National School Board was granted autonomous control over the national curriculum. The second and by far most important part of the Children Acts was the Child Labour Acts. It reiterated that child labour was illegal in the Ottoman Empire, yet there was an excess of 2.5 million children in the empire who were working in the fields, and some even in factories to provide for their families. Children Grants for children from low income families were made, commercial ventures and companies found to be employing child laborers were to be put on probation whilst the employers themselves were liable to be sent to prison. Finally, on the initiation of Lufti Fikri Bey, the Minister of Social Security and Labour, Children under the age of 18 who were committing crimes were not liable to go to prison, but instead had them serve community service acts. There was an exception for rape and murder, wherein children under the age of 18 committing rape and murder were still liable to go to jail, however all other criminal activities fell under the scope of community service.

    The Old Age acts introduced legislation in favor of monthly pensions for all elderly above the age of 70 with 40% of the average salary given in this pension system. Pensions were to be collected in the local postal office where the government would compile all peoples eligible for pensions. However, the requirements to be eligible to the pension was quite stiff, with the people trying to get pension having had to have stayed in the empire for 20 years or more, was a citizen of the country for the past 5 years at least and had not been in prison for the past 10 years. Despite this stiff eligibility criterion however, in 1922, 345,691 people in the Ottoman Empire became eligible to have pensions in the empire. This was a good decision on part of the government, as young peoples in the Empire who were trying to juggle their own work, and looking after their elderly parents or relatives found their monetary resources being saved on the initiation of the government itself, and would benefit the economy even more.


    1627975950212.png

    An Ottoman Textile Factory

    Finally the Workers Acts of 1922 introduced the minimum wage at 10 Lira per hour of official work. That amounted to $0.20 dollars per hour of work in the US at the time, and whilst it was slightly below average the European average, it was a good start for the Ottoman Empire as well. The Workers Acts also provided for the basic right that every worker in an industrial estate had the right to first aid treatment, rescue work, fire precautions at work, and holidays when needed. The Ministry of Social Security and Labour was made in charge of implementing and enforcing this act through and through. These reforms which were passed on the 3rd of June, 1922 were long in the coming, and would be extremely significant in the future Ottoman economy and society. They were needed on the basis of pure humanitarianism and on the basis of the ideology that the state had to take a key role in the welfare of its citizens. Whilst more reforms would be needed to make sure that the Ottoman Empire caught up to European standards, the Reforms of June, 1922 would lay the foundations for the future societal policy of the Ottoman Empire.” The Ottoman Welfare State: a History © 2016. [1]

    ***

    “When the 1908 Revolution came to be in the Ottoman Empire, it was a golden opportunity for the British Empire. It had not only removed an anti-British regime, but the new regime also sought encouragement from the British as a fellow constitutional monarchy. British policymakers grasped that the changes at Constantinople could present the United Kingdom with new found opportunities and Lord Fitzmaurice exulted that ‘the ball is at our feet. This is a golden opportunity to increase our influence in the Porte’. A political outreach was sent and when the Ottoman Parliament convened in 1908 for the first time in 31 years, the British parliament sent a heartfelt congratulatory note stating, ‘From the oldest sovereign parliament to the youngest on the auspicious occasion of its opening, the British government would like to extend a note of congratulations for all ambitious Ottomans who have re-instituted constitutionalism in the Empire of Osman.’ [2] Nevertheless, despite this turnaround of relations, Foreign Minister Grey in 1908, was more alive to the risks to British rule in India and Egypt posed by a strong constitutional Islamic regime in the Ottoman Empire.


    1627976003772.png

    The British Military Mission in the Ottoman Empire during the Balkan War.

    More widely, just as the British were aligning with the Russians, Grey found it difficult to align the British Empire with the Ottoman Empire, who was a traditional enemy of the Russian Empire. However, despite Ottoman neutrality with Britain following a cooling of relations in 1909, Grey and Asquith continued to encourage fellow Britons to join the Ottoman Bureaucracy to make sure that their reforms were successful. This put Britain in an uneasy quandary. In one extraordinary case, a young British officer named Wyndham Deedes accepted a commission into the Ottoman government, whilst also retaining his commission in the King’s Army. Taking the name of Wyndham Pasha whilst in Ottoman service, Deedes found himself leading Ottoman troops against the Italians in Benghazi during the Italo-Ottoman War, and again during the Balkan War as a battalion commander, despite the fact that he was a member of the British Army and Britain maintained their neutrality in both wars. Deedes was not alone in his predicament. British officers on both sides fought with one another in the Balkan War when the British Military Mission in Serbia and Bulgaria aided the Serbians and Bulgarians whilst the British Military Mission in the Ottoman Empire aided the Ottomans. Confusingly British arms industries began supplying both sides, which had raised tensions between London and Constantinople by a great deal before the war had ended.

    Despite winning the Italo-Ottoman War, the British government had pre-Balkan War, written the Ottoman Empire off as a neutral country that sometimes leaned towards the Ottoman Empire when Russia pushed it too much. The strategic outlook of writing the Ottomans off as a military non-entity was welcomed, as it would mean that the British would be able to focus resources on events much closer to home. However, the British were largely ignorant of the large scale modernization that the Ottoman army had undergone under Ali Kemal, and Mahmud Shevket Pasha, both of whom arguably laid down the foundation for the modern Ottoman Army. In 1915 the Ottomans stunned the world with their hard won victory in the Balkans, forcing all of the great powers to take a small diplomatic break from the Great War to threaten the Ottomans that too much Ottoman encroachment in the Balkans would not be welcomed. Nonetheless, the war had shown to the British that writing the Ottomans off as a military non-entity was dangerous and should not have been pursued.


    1627976039943.png

    Lord Kitchener

    With the military reforms of the Ottoman Empire, the prospect of a dangerous German-Austrian-Ottoman Alliance rose in the British government as a specter. IF the Ottomans wanted, they could invade Kuwait, the Abadan Oil Fields, and take Egypt before the British could formulate a proper response. Lord Kitchener, the Secretary of War in 1916 wrote down in his report that:-

    The Ottoman Empire has 12 divisions stationed in Hejaz and Transjordan, alongside 3 in Libya. This is more than enough to take Egypt in a short notice. If our communications are cut, it is obvious that the Empire will fall to pieces, and because of an Ottoman intervention, we will face ruin in this war.”

    It was by all rights a damning report citing all of the deficiencies of a defense of Egypt and the British Middle Eastern holdings. Russia could not be called to aid the British through the Caucasus on short notice, and the British fretted about the prospect of war with the Ottomans after 1915 a great deal. In 1918 when the Conservatives and Liberal Unionists came back to power, new Secretary of War, Edward Stanley, the 17th Earl of Derby was determined in his objective that for a secure Egypt, an Anglo-Ottoman Alliance would need to be pursued and remade. At first, most in the British government was not willing to enter an alliance with the Ottoman Empire. Austen Chamberlain, the Prime Minister worried that it would provide a made image to Russia, who was still nominally at least, a British ally. However, since 1918, relations with the Russian Empire became tense. The Russians were the strongest in mainland Europe, and everyone knew that. France was too far away to be an effective ally against Russia, Germany was broken and the Austrians wanted to stay neutral. The only remaining viable candidate was the Ottoman Empire. As a result, Chamberlain had been forced to make a pro-Ottoman policy in his foreign policy outlook and constantly aided Ottoman positions, especially during the Arabistan Crisis and the Declaration of Egyptian Independence.

    1627976085805.png

    Edward Stanley, the 17th Earl of Derby was the major proponent of a reborn Anglo-Ottoman Alliance

    Furthermore the election of the Ottoman Liberals during the 1922 Ottoman General Elections meant that a serious opportunity for an alliance had finally arrived. The Committee of Union and Progress under Ahmet Riza had opened talks regarding an alliance in 1920, however had dragged their feet over the issue, unwilling to make any permanent promise to London, whom they viewed with slight distrust, over the fact that the British had encroached into Ottoman territory as often as the Russians, Austrians and the French. The British government had been exasperated by this attitude of the Ottoman government and hoped that the new Ottoman government would prove amenable to an alliance. Mustafa Kemal Pasha knew the benefits of an alliance with London. He hadn’t forgotten the slights that the British had committed against the Empire, most especially the unilateral transfer of Cyprus to Greece, however knew that unless he wanted the growing enmity with Russia to make the Ottomans diplomatically isolated, he would have to swallow his pride and allow an alliance. On March 31st, 1922, the new foreign secretary of the Ottoman Empire, Faisal Al-Hashemi requested a formal convention with the British government to be held in either Egypt or in Malta. The Convention of Alexandria was decided to be held on the 25th of April, 1922 allowing the two respective countries to have three weeks to decide their formal alliance policies.

    1627976184319.png

    Faisal Al-Hashemi, the Ottoman Foreign Minister, led the Ottoman delegation

    Lord Curzon, the British Secretary of Foreign Affairs was the leading delegation in Alexandria and Faisal Al-Hashemi, the new Ottoman Minister of Foreign Affairs was the leading Ottoman delegation. After the usual pompous celebrations of a convention had been committed to and the Egyptian delegation gave a toast to the new Egyptian King, Abbas II, and the negotiations commenced. For five days, the Ottomans and the British danced a delicate game with one another, trying to receive more concessions from the other, and the Ottomans made it clear that they would not accept an unequal alliance. On the 30th of April, the Treaty of Alexandra affirmed the reborn Anglo-Ottoman Alliance. The treaty consisted of five articles:

    Article 1
    The contracting parties, recognizing the territorial sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire under the rule His Imperial Majesty, Abdulmejid, Second of His Name, and the United Kingdom, ruled by His Majesty, George, Fifth of His Name, will enter into a general alliance with one another, hoping to protect both country’s special interests with one another.
    Article 2
    Both countries shall come to support one another, if one of them is at war with any other Great Power.
    Article 3
    The Powers signing this alliance will promise to not enter into any separate agreement with any other power that would prejudice this treaty of alliance.
    Article 4
    The signatories of this alliance will communicate frankly and freely and fully with another so that the interests of this treaty are never in jeopardy.
    Article 5
    The alliance will remain in force for a period of ten years, with renewal available at the discretion of signing governments.

    It was obvious that the two powers were now in official league with one another against the interests of Russia, and to an extent, Italy and Austria. This diplomatic agreement, which would come to be known as the Rebirth of Anglo-Ottoman Dialogue would have massive consequences on the diplomatic future of the European continent.” The Anglo-Ottoman Alliance: Prelude to the Second Great War © 1994

    1627976217901.png

    The Convention of Alexandria

    ***

    “After the Arabistan Crisis, Soleiman Eskandari had inherited the premiership of the Qajar Dynasty in Iran. Iran was of course in deep turmoil after the Arabistan Crisis and ethnic riots between ethnic Arabs and ethnic Persians began to break out throughout the Iranian Countryside as the government dithered on what to do. Eskandari was a moderate and he had successfully negotiated the end of the crisis. He had led some tentative reforms and steps forward for the Persian country, however his reforms were lacking. This brought a conundrum to the Iranian plateau. Zia ol Din had been ousted because his reforms had been going on too fast, however Eskandari’s reforms were now going on too slowly. The country needed to balance traditionalism and modernism, and both sides knew that unless cross platform alliances and pacts were made modernization of Iran would remain a dream. It did not aid Eskandari that he was a poor speaker, and charismatically he was lacking.

    This led to political polarization in Iran as the people dithered on what they should do and what they should not be doing. Amidst all of this, a third faction rose to the challenge and stood to benefit from the infighting between the Reformists and Traditionalists in Iran. This was of course, the Revival Party. Led by Mohammad Tadayyon, the party called for a balance in religion in politics, the creation of a strong defensive military, the implementation of an efficient administrative system, the industrialization of the economy, the replacement of the domestic capital with foreign capital, the end of the nomadic system, the development of tax and educational systems, and promoting Iranian alongside local languages to make the country bilingual. Tadayyon had since 1920 been the education minister and his popularity was sky rocketing throughout the Iranian countryside. He had increased the people’s education budget, he had founded the bisexual Teachers College in Tehran, Qom, and Bandar Abbas. The Public Bill For Education passed in 1921 on his initiative had established adult training centers in cities alongside the creation of mobile schools for the nomadic tribes of Khorasan and Balochistan which increased the productivity of the Iranian economy by a great deal. Sports was made mandatory for all students under his tutelage, something that he wanted as a precaution against anti-health measures in the country and a Higher Education Council was established by the man as an education board as well.


    1627976310549.png

    Tehran in the 1920s.

    Whilst the entirety of the remainder of the Iranian cabinet and the government was stuck in their own problems, Tadayyon had managed to reform and overhaul the education system completely and his popularity rose as a result. Considering his own party’s success in preaching away from traditional lines of reformism and traditionalism, Tadayyon and the Revival Party made several inroads into Iranian society during this time period. However, despite this, the ruling Democratic Social Party and the opposition National Party remained blind to the threat that was right under their noses. When April 1922 came and the resulting elections were held, surprisingly the two parties, the Revival Party won a majority of the votes and won the majority of the seats within the National Consultative Assembly, much to the delight of Shah Abdul-Hussein Farman Farma Qajar, who was a keen follower of the Revival Party’s campaign. The Revival Party’s policy of cross-reformist and cross-traditionalist ideals, and the promise they made about balancing them together was a message that appealed to many Iranians, including the Shah. The Shah decreed that as his last act, he invited Tadayyon to become the new Prime Minister of Iran, which Tadayyon accepted after the elections showed that his party had won a majority. The Shah, who was old, and thinking about abdicating ever since 1916 finally did as such, and abdicated the throne to his second eldest son, Prince Abbas Mirza Farman Farma Qajar. His eldest son had died during the Qajar Civil War, and the new Shah, who was well known throughout Iran as a cultivator of culture, was widely popular as well. The elections and the passage of the throne peacefully did bring some peace and fraternity back to Iran, much to the pleasure of the new government formed by Tadayyon.

    1.png

    Tadayyon’s first act in June 23, 1922 was decisive. His first act was the Land Reform of Iran. Before this, 50% of agricultural lands in Iran belonged to landlords, and 20% belonged to the normal people, 10% belonged to the Qajar Dynasty itself, and the remaining 20% was held in trust between the people and the Shah. This state of affairs couldn’t last and the new Prime Minister of Iran knew this. The government began to buy land and sold them at astonishing rates to peasants and farmers and farmer associations to make farming and agriculture a far more efficient task in Iran. Uncultivated lands were taken by the government and held in trust for future developments and Landlords, on the orders of their new Prime Minister and new moderate Shah were forced to either distribute their rental income or sell their land to farmers under lease agreements. Thus, this made the maximum ownership of land under one owner very limited and absolutely minimum. Public properties that were endowed by the government were leased to the people as well. Furthermore, a Land Reform Council was formed by the order of Tadayyon to oversee the proper implementation of the Iranian Land Reform Package. In order to gain the money to do this, the new Prime Minister sought the aid of British, Russian and Ottoman foreign capital, playing the three sides off one another, as the Iranians reaped the benefits of the economic race between St. Petersburg, London and Constantinople in Iran. Thus began the Reformist Era in Iran.” Tadayyon of Iran: Father and Modernizer © 2018

    ***

    “After the declaration of Egyptian independence, a moderate constitution that guaranteed various freedoms was established and promulgated. King Abbas II gave a royal writ asking for the first elections in Egyptian history to take place after said royal writ was given to the political realm of the country. Nationalist leader Saad Zaghloul who had been exiled to Aden in 1917 for his increasing nationalist tendencies against the British government was allowed to return to take part in the electoral campaign. Abbas II allowed the new Electoral Commission, chaired by British and Ottoman leaders to determine the perfect date for an election, and it was decided that on May 27, 1922 the first elections in Egyptian history would take place. Zaghloul led the Wafd Party through their political campaign. The Wafd was a pro-British Egyptian Nationalist Party that believed in fiscal conservatism to make sure that the economy was cultivated properly. Zaghloul promised land reform, renegotiating some aspects of the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty that was not in favor with the common population and promised that he would see to the proper development of Egypt. Despite his history, he co-opted the British and presented himself to the British as a moderate and likeable candidate, and managed to win several funds for his campaign from British staffers and British financial backers as well.

    In contrast, the Watani Party, the strongest opposition to Wafd, was singularly focused only on one thing. British occupation of the country and the splitting of Sudan from Egypt to become Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. Led by Mohammad Farid, the party was virulent in their attacks against the British government, and the party agitated for a revolution against the British. The party was also traditionalist and rooted in common historic Egyptian traditions and rooted in Islamic theology. This was a bad move for the party, as it nearly ensured that the minority, but still powerful Christian vote went to the Wafd party instead of the Watani. The Jews of Sinai on the other hand had also formed a political party to make sure that their political representation in Egypt was respected. It was a testament to the steady Jewish migration to the Sinai Peninsula that there were around ~115,000 Jews in Egypt, allowing a proper Jewish political party, the Jewish Protection Agency was formed by moderate Zionist Chaim Weizmann.


    2.png
    The elections ended in a landslide victory for the Wafd Party, with the party gaining 181 out of the 264 seats available in the new Egyptian Chamber of Deputies. Zaghloul was invited to become the new Prime Minister of Egypt, and the country entered its new constitutional era. However, despite the landslide victory, the Watani party did perform much better than what was expected of them, and this worried the British government by a great deal. Zaghloul placated the British government by quietly dropping his demand for some revisions in the treaty and allowed some concessions from the Egyptian government to take place, though he stood his ground on major issues. Weizmann was also worried by the rise of radical Zionists in Zionist Sinai and asked several members of the Sinai Jewish community for moderation, however the Jewish Protection Agency was quickly becoming entangled between three factions, the Reformists, the Radicals and the Moderates. Weizmann belonged to the moderates, and the reformists were a minority. Together they outnumbered the Radicals by a small majority and Weizmann was foolish enough to ask the aid of the Egyptian government to try and root out the radical Zionists of his party, whom Weizmann believed would destroy the fragile peace of the Jews in Egypt.

    Ze’ev Jabotinsky, a dangerous radical Jew, known for political violence, and rising star of the radical faction took advantage of this call for aid, and denounced Weizmann as a traitor. The Sinai Crisis had managed to radicalize many Zionists and the radicals flocked to Jabotinsky’s banner who conducted a rapid political coup within the party against Weizmann. Weizmann was found killed in the party headquarters in New Tiberias, and after a rigged leadership election, Jabotinsky rose to the position as Party Leader easily. Jabotinsky knew that he had to co-opt the Egyptians and British for the time being, and he was a cunning man. He adopted a wait and strike policy and quietly stood at the sidelines saying nothing, allaying British and Egyptian fears. Unfortunately, many lives would have been saved if the man had been ousted by the Egyptians and the British in 1922. That action would have saved countless Jewish, Arab, Egyptian, British and Ottoman lives during the Second Great War. The ball for the Second Sinai Crisis was already rolling…….” The Middle East in the Second Great War: A Political Prelude. © 2020

    ***

    Footnotes:-

    [1] – Reforms are based on the British Liberal Welfare Reforms.

    [2] – Otl quote.
     
    Relations of the Ottoman Empire
  • a. Great Powers
    1. UK - Allies
    2. France - Neutral
    3. Italy - Former Enmity growing into neutrality
    4. Austria/Danubia - Friendly
    5. Germany - Neutral
    6. Russia - Growing Hostile
    7. Japan - Growing Economic Trade
    8. USA - Slightly Cold
    b. Secondary Powers
    1. Romania - Friendly
    2. Greece - Friendly, growing closer
    3. Spain - Neutral
    4. Netherlands - Growing Economic Ties
    5. Sweden - Growing Economic Ties
    6. China - Growing Friendly Relations
    7. Brazil - Cold
    c. The Neighbors
    1. Bulgaria - Neutral, leaning friendly
    2. Serbia - Neutral, leaning hostile
    3. Iran - Pro-Ottoman Neutrality
    4. Republic of Inner Arabia - Economic Friendliness, diplomatic neutrality
    5. Egypt - Pro-Ottoman Neutrality
     
    Chapter 50: The Arms of Nations
  • Osman Reborn

    Chapter 50: The Arms of Nations

    ***

    “The re-emergence of the Anglo-Ottoman Alliance after the Convention of Alexandria was an important watershed moment for the Ottoman Empire and the United Kingdom in the early 20th Century. The United Kingdom was rather getting worried about the increasing economic and military power of the Russian Empire, despite its internal problems, and the Ottomans, having sought a great power ally for over a decade by that point, were thankful that they did receive said ally. The Ottomans being welcomed back as a military great power, albeit one of the weaker ones, meant that a military overview on part of all the great powers surrounding the Empire took place. Russia had its entire Caucasian Military districts conduct military exercises to check their reliability and supply lines into the region were being closely reviewed in case of an infrastructural anomaly. Danubia checked their own defenses in Bosnia, having not forgotten the irredentist desires of some far-right members in the Ottoman Chamber of Deputies and Senate. The Italians, who were still recovering from their civil war and the Great War, put their Adriatic fleet into naval readiness to check their availability in a fast war. The Iranians viewed the alliance with suspicion and started to compile military resources as well. Arabia, cornered on all sides by the British and Ottomans, began their process of militarization as well, which would culminate in the Second Great War.

    The Ottoman Empire for its credit did begin to initiate major military reforms once again under the leadership of Mustafa Fevzi Pasha, the Minister of the Army and Airforce. This was something that was long in the coming. In order to streamline monetary resources, a lot of the money allocated for the military budget had been diverted in 1920 and the Military was never happy with that idea, and they had protested a lot. They feared that without continuous reforms, the Ottoman army would fall behind the other European counterparts. On July 4, the first step towards a more modern Ottoman Army came to be when the Imperial Tank Regiment was formed under the authority of both Abdulmejid II and the Mustafa Kemal Pasha. The Ottomans had an indigenous tank platform, the Anadolu Mk. I tank, which was as good as any other tank in the international market, though it was produced in lower numbers than any French, Danubian, Russian or British tank. After the creation of the Imperial Tank Regiment, however, that was no longer the case. The Ottomans in 1922 had a total of 98 tanks, and they intended to increase that number up to around 250 by 1925, with the creation of two major brigades for the Tank Regiments. This would be the slow start of the Ottoman Empire’s armored forces.


    1628423308597.png

    The Anadolu Mk. I Tank.

    But whilst more investment into the army was a good decision, having personally seen the effect that airpower had in warfare during the Balkan War, Mustafa Kemal Pasha was more interested in what was going on in the airforce. The Imperial Ottoman Airforce as it was being unofficially called back then, had around 156 fighters, and 93 bombers in service, alongside around 600 pilots and some more servicemen that were required for maintenance. The Ottomans were primarily using the Aslan Bir as their main fighter and the Volant I as their main bombers [1]. The Ottomans had a vested interested in airpower due to the fact that the Ottoman’s military tactics that were being developed in the 1920s heavily centered around the avenue of using airpower to increase the firepower of the army to defeat opponents. Without aerial superiority, many tacticians reasoned, complete victory in modern warfare was practically not possible. The Ottomans as such were eager to become the major proponents of airpower during the interwar era, and funded the most research into airpower per capita than any other great power during the same time. A major consolidation of the aerial services of the Empire took place when the Ottoman Air Force was officially established as a separate distinct entity away from the army and a separate ministry was formed for the Air force and aerial services. The new Minister of the Air Force was named to be Ahmet Ali Celikten, who was a veteran pilot of the Italo-Ottoman War and the Balkan War, and as such, was particularly experienced in aerial matters. Merely a month after his appointment as Minister of the Airforce, on the 8th of September, 1922, Celikten introduced the New Aerial Plan (NAP) that was to be the founding basis of the Ottoman Empire’s aerial strategy until 1930.

    The culmination of the NAP was the consolidation of governmental owned aerial industrial estates into the Grifon Imperial Aerospace Industries (GIAI) by the Ottomans, using British shares to fund the consolidation of the estates. Several of these industrial estates that were consolidated all had differing blueprints and differing ideas about how future ottomans aerial designs would need to be constructed. The Ottomans fostered this division, hoping to make competition grow into innovation. This was certainly the case when after more than two weeks of fierce debates over which new models would need to be designed and manufactured, the Grifon Siren, Grifon Tsoviodz and Grifon Vronti won out.

    The Grifon Siren was a single engine reconnaissance aircraft that was designed by Smyrna Aerial Studios, before it was consolidated. The airplane itself required a crew of 3 men, and had a length of 36 feet and a wingspan of 45 feet whilst also being 12 feet in height. With a single powerplant of Smyrna III Water cooled engines, it had a power of 450 horsepower. Its maximum speed was around 196 kilometers per hour, and it had a service ceiling of 3,950 meters. To defend itself, it serviced two .303 inch guns. [2] The sole purpose of the plane was to become the prime reconnaissance plane for the Air force, especially at sea to make up for the smaller number of ships in the Ottoman Navy. The Ottoman Government in late September had 40 of these planes ordered from Grifon. The Grifon Tsoviodz on the other hand, was directly made to complement the Ottoman Navy, as it was designed as a torpedo bomber. Jointly made by Ottoman and British engineers, it consisted best of the two empire’s engineering capabilities for the time. In the UK, the name of the plane was the Grifon Swift, but in the Ottoman Empire, it was called the Grifon Tsoviodz after the Armenian phrase for ‘sea serpent’. The Grifon Tsoviodz needed only 1 man as its crew, whilst it was 35 ft 4 ½ inches in length, 45 ft 5 ¾ inches in wingspan, and 12 ft 11 inches in height. Having the powerplant of the powerful Napier Lion V Engine, it had a much larger range of around 700 kilometers. It had a maximum speed of 172 kilometers per hour, and a service ceiling of 3,900 meters. It had installed within it, 1 fixed forward firing Vickers machine gun, and 1 lewis gun in the rear cockpit, whilst it could carry 2 x 236 kg bombs under each wing. [3] For the time, it was the very icon of a modern torpedo bomber. The Ottoman Naval Ministry, the moment it read through the details of the plane, demanded that a large procurement of the planes take place. The Ottoman government forced the ministry of naval affairs to back down on their rather extravagant order of 300 planes, and managed to scale it down to 75, which was both realistic and in line with the aerial budget.


    1628423475602.png

    The Suleiman Class Battlecruisers

    In the naval portion of the ottoman building schema, the Kaysar Class Battleships were utter failures. The Ottomans hadn’t lacked ambition, trying to build 37,000 tonnes warships, however the sheer price of the project, and the fact that only the dockyards in Constantinople or Smyrna would have the capacity to handle such large warships ended the program unfortunately for its enthusiastic followers. The Suleiman Class Battlecruisers entering service into the navy after retiring Barbaros Heyreddin and Turgut Reis as training ships, however, overshadowed the disappointment, and the first capital ships built in the Ottoman Empire after 1881 was proudly displayed to the public on Salonika and Constantinople. With the threat of British and Greek naval attacks on the Ottoman Empire decisively over, the Ottomans however needed a naval policy change. The other contenders against the Empire was Italy, who despite being financially wrecked, still held a massive navy for its economy, and the Russians, who had a powerful fleet in the Black Sea that outstripped the Ottoman Black Sea Fleet by massive proportions. The new naval directive that was issued in September, 1922 made the expansion of the Adriatic Fleet and the Black Sea Fleet emphasized within the Ottoman naval establishment, and emphasis on capital ships, whilst not dropped, was slightly sidelined in favor of smaller ships such as destroyers and torpedo boats. Similarly, the pending transfer of the nearly completed 3 Danae Class Light Cruisers from Britain to the Ottoman Navy were slated to be distributed between the Black Sea Fleet and the Adriatic. This policy would lay down the foundations of Ottoman naval policy for the Second Great War.” Ottoman Military Development in the Interwar Era © 2010.

    ***

    “Constantinople was and is the heart of the Ottoman Empire. However, despite it being a sprawling metropolitan city that was on par with any European capital in terms of population and concentration of wealth, the Ottomans never really had a proper metropolitan railway system in any of their urban areas. It was the initiation of Demetrios Aetos, the new head of the Ottoman Railway Company in early 1922, that the Ottomans started to look into metropolitan railway systems to increase their economic and transportation efficiency within the country. Aetos correctly assumed that the loading off and on of goods on the Asian side of the city and the European side of the city was creating economic inefficiencies that needed to be addressed with the creation of an underground railroad system. Construction of underwater tunnels wasn’t something that was entirely too dangerous during this time period either, despite common stereotypes, and tunnels under 4 to 5 kilometers in length underwater were perfectly sustainable and lacked major dangers. Aetos proposed the construction of a Constantinople Underground Railway with three underwater tunnels running from Asian Constantinople into European Constantinople at Asiyan (878 meters), Beylerbeyi Sarayi (1.11 km), and Harem to Kumkapi (2.6 kilometers). The last tunnel would be the hardest to complete, and was predicted correctly to be the longest as well. This project took direct inspiration from the Holland Tunnel that was being constructed in the United States of America, and Severn Tunnel in the United Kingdom.


    1628423590530.png

    Ottoman Railway Company Share certificate

    Aetos submitted his proposal to the government on the 11th of July, 1922, with an entire map planned out. The man’s proposal was given serious thought, as the Ottoman Minister for the Interior, Emmanuil Emmanuilidis could certainly see the benefits of a metropolitan railway system, both economically and societally. On the 18th of July, the proposal was passed by the Interior Ministry and passed to the cabinet. The cabinet had been initially against the plan, deeming the price they had to pay for such a project, entirely too large. Mustafa Kemal Pasha, whilst supportive of the plan, also advised that the construction of the railway only take place in the future, due to the fact that the budget would be squeezed entirely if the railway project received approval from the cabinet. Other members of the cabinet, did point out that the project would save millions of Lira that were being lost in cross-strait ferrying and time lost if the project went ahead. Unwilling to divide the cabinet over the issue, Kemal took the matter to the Chamber of Deputies. The Liberal Union as a whole supported the project in the Chamber of Deputies, whilst the Committee of Union and Progress, led by Matthaois Kofidis after Riza resigned after the general elections, opposed the plan, pointing towards the costs and dangers of the program. The Ottoman Democratic and Progressive Parties on the other hand supported the plan. So did the Socialists for that matter, as it was a modernizing move for the economy and for them, a step in the right direction.

    1628423708684.png

    The Chamber of Deputies discussing the railway issue

    In the end, the chamber of deputies passed the plan on the 28th of August, 1922 and allowed Aetos and his company to gain a monopoly over the construction of the Constantinople Underground Railway (CUR). The construction for the project began some days later, and Aetos and the government began surveying the construction keenly. The Ottomans made the Underground Rail Commission to direct the construction of the underground railway and to make sure that it would allow the government to directly supervise the construction efforts. It was decided at a conference of the Ottoman Railway Company and CUR that the railways would be electric underground railways based on deep level tubes, such as the ones found in the United Kingdom and the United States at the time. The time period for the construction was deemed until 1928 by which point, the underground would be fully constructed. Future expansion was an option that both the Ottoman Railway Company and the government kept on vague grounds, so as to not make the monetary question arise again.

    1628423820929.png

    Construction of the Constantinople Underground Railroad

    With the construction of an underground railway system, the government began to look into other metropolitan cities in the empire as well, which would be aided by the construction of a metro-rail system. The only other city that was likely to get one in the near future however was Smyrna/Izmir, which was just as populated as Constantinople during the time. Other prospective cities included places like Angora (Ankara), Sinope, Baghdad, Damascus, Jerusalem, Salonika, Tirana, and Prishtina. However, these cities were not on the top priority for transportation efficiency and the government, as such only opened dialogue with the local authorities of Smyrna for conducting geographic surveys within the city.” A History of Rail Transport in the Ottoman Empire © 2018

    ***

    “The Ottoman Imperial Family after the restoration of the Constitution is a fascinating subject to look at. Hailed as the founders and the spiritual representation of the empire, after Mehmed V, the Ottoman Sultans and Caliphs have embodied Islamic Constitutional Monarchies. The death of Mehmed V was a tragic affair, and the assassination of his successor, Mehmed VI was perhaps, an even greater tragedy. By contrast, Mehmed VI’s successor, Abdulmejid II was more interested in cultural affairs than supervising every aspect of the government, like his two predecessors had done. A religious pragmatist, and a culturally devout Islamic theologian, the man was well-liked by most in the Ottoman Empire.


    1628424598475.png

    A painting by Abdulmejid II

    His paintings which were exquisite in their own right, and praised sincerely by most painters throughout the Islamic world, had an unintended but beneficial side effect too. When in 1921, the Sultan gifted several paintings of his own to the Constantinople Museum of the Arts, and funded a painting competition for young arts students, he started a trend. Painting competitions erupted throughout the Ottoman Empire, trying to gain the attraction of the Imperial Family. Sultan Abdulmejid II, always an admirer of good paintings and hard work, encouraged this, and used his personal funds to back several competitions in art universities and colleges. This led to what is called the ‘Imperial Renaissance’ in the Ottoman Empire. For Abdulmejid II set off a chain reaction within the Empire. Paintings turned towards poetry. Epic length verses about the greatness of the Ottoman Empire, the victory in the Balkan War, and the development of the empire were all popular topics for new poems during this time. Poetry, like in almost any Islamic country, inevitably led towards calligraphy. Increased importance was given to the Tughra style calligraphy, and the development of the Thuluth style Islamic calligraphy grew in the empire as well. Unlike previous Ottoman cultural periods however, the Christian minorities of the empire were involved right at the heart of the Imperial Renaissance. Paintings from extremely pro-Ottoman Christian painters had few paintings depicting the Sultans as warriors of God depicted (most were cut down as blasphemy by the Ottoman Government, though ambiguous ones were allowed to stay), and more especially, paintings depicting the charity works of progressive sultans like Osman II, Suleiman I, Abdulmejid II, Mehmed V, Abdulmejid I in the best light possible began circulating in the Christian half of the empire during the Imperial Renaissance. Ottomanism itself was directly strengthened by this cultural movement, as literary proses praising the growing strength of the Ottoman Empire began to spring up in Ottoman poetry from all ethnic groups during this time. More iconic was the adoption of the Tughra within Christian calligraphy circles as well.

    The Tughra had been for quite some time, a style of calligraphy that was allowed for Islamic calligraphers in the Ottoman Empire. But with equality of religion guaranteed by the constitution, many Christian and jewish calligraphers in the empire were starting to adopt the Tughra technique and it was spreading throughout the Empire like wildfire. There is a good reason why the Tughra is seen as one of the Ottoman Empire’s national symbols even today.

    The Sultanas of the Ottoman Empire, Sehsuvar Hanim and Mehisti Hanim were especially encouraging of the Imperial Renaissance movement. The two were popular for their commitment to Abdulmejid II, and as the Sultan was going to be the last Sultan with multiple wives in the Ottoman Empire, the two used their special status to grant extra funds, extra charities to the Imperial Renaissance movement. Mehisti Hanim, who was proficient with the cello went to public theatres throughout the empire to display her talent with the instrument, and Sehsuvar was extremely talented with the violin, and she too went to different theatres of the empire, displaying her talent for the country and empire to see.


    1628424653939.png

    a 9 year old Durrusehvar Sultan

    Abdulmejid II’s legitimate daughter, and by all rights, the heir to the Abdulmejid II portion of the Osmanoglu line, Durrusehvar Sultan, was also growing up at a constant pace. At 9 years old, she was already smart, and she was learning the various languages of the empire through her court tutors. She studied various subjects that was prescribed in the national curriculum as well. Her bubbly yet polite attitude was used by the Ottoman Foreign Ministry when courting foreign investors and foreign diplomats. They loaned her from her parents, and under the watchful eye of an Imperial caretaker, the young girl would be taken by foreign ministry and would be told to entertain the diplomats and investors. Her exposure to political and diplomatic life at such a young age certainly aided her when she ascended to the throne as Sultana in 1947.

    The Heir to the Ottoman Throne, Osman Fuad, was also living a life of luxury after the death of Ahmed Nihad in 1917, to his displeasure. As a spare heir, he was allowed before to fight in the Italo-Ottoman War, and the Balkan War, however after he was confirmed as heir, the Ottoman Government refused to allow himself to join any dangerous activities within the empire that might have even the tiniest risk of danger. Osman Fuad was so despaired by the golden cage he was imprisoned in, that he appealed to his close old friend, Mustafa Kemal Pasha after he became Grand Vizier to take him out. Ironically, all Kemal had to do was ask Abdulmejid II to take him out and the heir was out of his confinement in Topkapi Palace, and though he was not allowed to join any dangerous activities, he was allowed to move throughout the empire. His marriage in July 7, 1922 to Akabe Aslanyan Hanim, an ethnic Armenian who belonged to an Islamic Armenian family of old was controversial to Turkish nationalists within the empire, however his marriage was welcomed by the vast majority of the empire. It was a symbol of ethnic tolerance and ethnic peace in the Empire too. And though Akabe proved to be infertile in the end, depriving Osman Fuad of a direct heir when he became Osman IV, the marriage was a harmonious marriage, filled with respect for one another.” The Ottoman Imperial Family: A History © 2020

    ***

    “After eight years of negotiation, Dutch Minister for the Colonies, Simon de Graaff finally accepted the Dutch East Indies and their calls for at least, slow democratization. The East Indies and their nationalist leaders had been trying to get at least a colonial legislature ever since 1913 after the final conflicts of the Aceh War had come to an end. However, the Dutch had quickly recognized that the special autonomy given to Aceh had stirred up regionalists sentiments in the colonies, and the Dutch tried to take advantage of this and exploit this upswing in regionalist feelings. To an extent, they were successful in preventing a unified demand, as regionalists managed to gain momentum in Aceh, South Moluccas, and Dutch Papua, however the rest of the colonies consisting of Java, Borneo and Sumatra continued to agitate for reforms within their colonial setup.


    1628424696183.png

    Prime Minister Charles Ruijs de Beerenbrouck of the Netherlands

    Reform in the colonies however was something that was long in the coming. The plantation class owners in the east indies were extremely powerful in their influence, and virtually everyone, even the Dutch government in Amsterdam wanted to do nothing with the plantation owners, as they always made up fusses whenever new laws were passed. The exploitation of the East Indies economically made the economic exploitation of India, Africa on a per capita basis seem tame, and whilst a shared identity was still not really there, the East Indies were all united in their belief that if the Netherlands wanted the East Indies to not revolt, then reforms was absolutely necessary. The reform package was led in the Dutch domestic sphere by Prime Minister Charles Ruijs de Beerenbrouck. Beerenbrouck was a unique case. Before 1918 Catholics were barred from being Prime Minister in the Netherlands, and other political offices were closed to them as well. As such, Beerenbrouck definitely knew how people felt when they were left out of the governing political apparatus and was sympathetic to some of the goals of the East Indies and their inhabitants.

    The reform commission for the Dutch East Indies had their first meeting on the 23rd of October, 1919 and the Dutch Prime Minister gave the commission a time period of two years to come up with a reform package which would be mutually beneficial to both sides. On the 25th of November, 1921, the commission handed their report to the government. The report advocated for the creation of a 120 seat legislature, with 30% of the population, who had access to literacy being allowed to vote. The legislature would have 83 seats allowed to be contested in the election, and the rest of the seats would have their incumbents appointed by the Dutch government and the European minority in the Dutch East Indies. This legislature, which was to be named Volksraad in the future, would have power over the right to vote on taxes, expenditures, local development, trade regulation, salary regulation, and would be allowed to vote for contingent elections for the deputy governor of the Dutch East Indies. It kept other matters of the state, such as the overall economy, foreign affairs, education, religion, military all firmly in the hand of the Dutch government, reinforcing their control of the colonies, whilst also placating the nationalists with a lot of their goals being met.


    1628424730143.png

    The Volksraad

    The plan was then presented to the East Indies on the 12th of February, 1922, and the East Indies’s Nationalist deputies agreed to the reform plan easily. The Dutch East Indies Colonial Reform passed through the Dutch parliament on the 27th of May, 1922, solidifying the reform, and elections for the first volksraad was called up for August 27, 1922.

    As pro-independence parties and socialist parties were banned by the government, a centrist pro-autonomist and pro-regionalist party (it was more like a loose alliance) formed around Ki Hajar Dewantara and his National Party of the East Indies. It was explicitly unionist in nature, and rejected the idea that each ethnic group of the East Indies could have their ethnic independence. Instead it argued for Pan-East Indian politics. It also had a hint of classical liberalism and social democracy in its economic outlook. Meanwhile, the Sultan of Aceh, Daud Syah II took up the political scene, and organized an Acehnese regionalist party as well called the Aceh Alliance. It was directly funded with Aceh Royalty and Aceh Aristocracy’s money, which made the party dominant and virtually unchallenged in Aceh. Previous Dutch efforts to conduct a divide and conquer strategy did pay off, and the Papua Representation Committee and the Maluku Movement all explicitly rejected a Pan East Indian identity. The Minorities Representation Association led by Tjokorda Gde Raka Soekawati was however pro Pan-East Indies despite the fact that it was formed to protect the rights of the religious minorities, such as the Hindus, Buddhists and Christians though most of their voting populace remained ambiguous on the issue.


    volksraad election.png

    During the elections, the National Party of the East Indies won the majority of the votes, and won a 1-seat majority in the Volksraad. As such, Ki Hajar Dewantara was elected to become the first President of the East Indies Volksraad. This would be the first step towards the creation of the Realm of Nusantara.” The Peaceful Reformation of the Dutch Empire; a Historical Case to be pursued? © 2016

    ***

    Footnotes:-

    [1] – Check post #1547 for airplane information

    [2] – Based on otl Blackburn Blackburn.

    [3] – Based on Blackburn dart otl.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 51: Societal Changes
  • Osman Reborn

    Chapter 51: Societal Changes

    ***

    “The Chinese Civil War became much more serious after the Warlords of China began to concentrate their forces against the Imperial Chinese Army. The Battle of Dingxi led by Prince De in Ningxia made sure that the Chinese Mongols managed to create a pincer movement against the Imperial troops in Central China, thus bypassing much of their defenses. Similarly, the Warlords in Sichuan were also starting to invade the northern tracts of lands to group up with Prince De, with the intention of splitting Imperial China into two.

    This move from Prince De was however thwarted when Deng Yanda, a young colonel of the Imperial Chinese Army managed to rally the Central Chinese armies and managed to defeat Prince De at the Battle of Tianshui, thus allowing the creation of the Tianshui corridor, which would allow Imperial China to remain connected via land to its western provinces.


    1628770798833.png

    Deng Yanda, the hero of the Tianshui Corridor

    The Warlords enjoyed greater success in the south, where Republican and anti-monarchical sentiment was most powerful. The warlords managed to invade these territories pretty quickly and were sweeping through the lands. In the north however, the Warlords were not having as much of a good time in the Chinese Civil War. The most modern and most experienced armies of the Imperial Chinese Army were based in Zhili to defend Beijing from attacks from Manchuria, Inner Mongolia and Shanxi. The Warlords had only managed to bloody themselves with no gain as these veteran units of the Chinese army managed to stop any sort of warlord advance on Beijing in several hotly contested battles in the Zhili Campaign.

    In Anhui, the military situation was much worse for the Warlords. Without a land connecting with the rest of the Warlords, the Anhui Clique was being pressured by the Imperial Chinese and Provisional Republic, as both sides squeezed into Anhui, with the Anhui Clique being unable to contest both of the powers attacking them. By the end of the year 1922, around half of Anhui was occupied. Of course, the fact that Imperial China and the Provisional Republic were not allied and were enemies made things all the more complicated in Anhui, as the troops devolved into three way battles that left hundreds of thousands killed and wounded, only for the battles to remain inconclusive.

    Politically, the 13th Dalai Lama, who was also the Governor of Tibet for the Imperial Chinese Government, had warned Beijing that he would not be able to defend Tibet from any incursion from Sichuan if the vital land connection was lost. The Dalai Lama could raise a lot of troops, but said troops would be useless if the equipment being sent over from Beijing through the railway system did not arrive. Losing the land connection would have had disastrous consequences domestically in Tibet as well. Several monks and higher officials in Tibet were already questioning why they couldn’t just become an independent nation and were plotting against the Dalai Lama. The Dalai Lama for his part had come to accept Chinese rule, on the condition that a special autonomy for the region was guaranteed. The position of Governor of Tibet being synonymous with the Dalai Lama was just one of these regional powers given to Tibet. The Lama knew that if the Tianshui corridor was lost, then the internal conspirators within Lhasa and Shigatse would erupt into a general rebellion against the Chinese government. For the Lama, this was bad news, as he also knew that the warlords would sweep in and conquer Tibet, removing all of its autonomous powers. As such, after reinforcing the frontlines in the Tibetan Plateau, all of the remainder troops that the Lama could muster were sent to Tianshui to aid the defense of the corridor. He also used the Tibetan diaspora in Nepal and Bhutan to seek foreign aid for the Imperial Chinese. Nepalese Tibetans and Bhutanese Tibetans came to Tibet as volunteers and aided the Tibetan manpower situation as well.


    1628770836739.png

    Tibetan troops being mobilized for the Chinese Civil War.

    However other than internal problems, China had more grievous problems to face. That of Russia and Japan. Russia had not signed the Five Power Treaty and for good reason. The Russians saw the Chinese Civil War as a means of trying to increase their lost power in the Far East. The Russian Ambassador to the Chinese, Nikolai Kudashev was ordered by Tsar Nicholas II to use all delaying means that was considered necessary to delay any sort of diplomatic arrangement between Beijing and St. Petersburg. The Russians in particular were worried about the Chinese Eastern Railway, which was still under the jurisdiction of the Russian government. The Railway ran right inside of Manchuria’s territory and would become involved in the fighting. In fact, the few bombers that Imperial China was in ownership of, had already started to bomb some strategic sites in Manchuria, including a few stations of the Chinese Imperial Railway.

    On the 15th of October, 1922, the Russian government rejected an offer from the Hongxian Emperor asking for a diplomatic treaty that would allow the Chinese to fight the civil war without foreign distractions such as Russia. The continued aerial attacks on the Chinese Eastern Railway had alienated the Russians and the Russian government was also quite unhappy with the reported friendly relations between the Ottoman Empire and the Chinese Empire. Considering the Ottoman Empire was a British ally, the Chinese Empire was a de-facto British ally as well, something that was in direct challenge to Russia’s geopolitical interests. This resulted in Russia starting to intrigue with the Warlord of Manchuria, Guo Songling. Guo was all the happier to accept Russian aid, and after giving promises to increase the railway lease, and the to allow a Russian base after the war in one of Manchuria’s ports, the Manchurian warlord was soon swamped with Russian aid in the form of weapons, ammunitions, and food. When the Chinese government found out that there were Russian weapons found in the hands of Manchurian rebels, the government cut off all diplomatic relations in a fit of anger.

    Japan on the other hand, had signed the Five Power Treaty. This was almost immediately undermined by the fact that the once lucrative South Manchuria Railway, which had an excess of 140 million dollars in investment from Japan, had fallen by 70% after the Chinese Civil War broke out. The Japanese government was not happy with this massive loss of economic commodities in Manchuria, and on the 29th of October, 1922, demanded that the Chinese government do something to protect Japanese commercial interests in Manchuria. The Chinese government wanted to give false hopes, however the Hongxian Emperor was blunt, and told Japan that as Manchuria was in rebel hands, the protection of the South Manchuria Railway could not be guaranteed. He did offer to compensate Japan, however the sheer amount of money that was being lost for Japan was nearly impossible for the Chinese to compensate in their financial situation.

    The Japanese Foreign Minister, Kato Takaaki was not in favor of an intervention in China, stating that it would alienate Britain and the United States of America, both of whom had huge stakes in the region. However, led by Minister of the Interior, Kanetake Oura, who was also a military official, the cabinet voted upon intervention in mainland china in the Chinese Civil War. The decision was met with incredulity in China, and a diplomatic note asking for clarification of the ‘intervention’ was asked.


    a.PNG

    Frontlines of the Chinese Civil War by the end of 1922
    Red - Warlords Alliance
    Green - Imperial China
    Purple - Provisional Republic of China

    No such clarification was forthcoming for the Chinese. Military preparations for an intervention had already commenced, but thankfully for China, it was the death of Prime Minister Okuma Shigenobu and his replacement by Foreign Minister Kato Takaaki that ended any ideas of a full scale Japanese intervention. Kato repealed the order, however in order to placate the Military and the Ministry of Finance, Japanese troops were dispatched to key tactical railway stations of the South Manchurian Railway, whilst he reiterated to China that the Japanese Empire would remain neutral whilst armed. The seeds for the Second Sino-Japanese War were already sown.” The Chinese Civil War: Domestic and Foreign Politics in Perspective © 2005



    “One of the key foundations of Mustafa Kemal Pasha and the Liberal Party’s victory in the 1922 General Elections was their promise that they would reform the Ottoman Empire into a general welfare state. And the July Reforms that had been implemented were supposed to be the starter of the economic and social reform plan. However, after said bills had passed through the Ottoman Chamber of Deputies, the Ottoman Government was stuck with the costs and problems of implementation. This meant that the government for the time being had to stall any other reformist ideas that they wished to implement politically, whilst allowing the executive to enforce the new reforms. The Ottoman government could not afford to commit the same mistakes that the Qing Dynasty had committed; rushing into reforms that exploded right in their faces. The ruling political apparatus in the Ottoman Empire, whether they be from the center, right, or left, all recognized this fact, and were all cautious about implementing reforms all over the place.

    As the other bills came into implementation, the earlier concerns about too many reforms were taken into account, and softer, yet still significant reforms were undertaken by the Ottoman Empire. After the July Reforms, the Ottoman Empire decided that it would be much better served if they turned their attention to justice and educational reforms, which were softer, and subtler subjects for reform.


    Prison and Justice Reform in the Ottoman Empire under Mustafa Kemal and the Liberal Government of 1922

    True prison reform in the Ottoman Empire was first promulgated by Sultan Abdulmejid II in 1850, when the Imperial Ottoman Penal Code was established as a part of the Ottoman Tanzimat Reforms. Before the Penal Code was adopted, the state of Ottoman prisons was dire. People starved to death inside of the prisons, and the lucky ones that survived clung on to life with desperation only seen in the most anguished of men. Practical reasons aside, the Ottomans also engaged in justice and prison reforms for ideological purposes, as in the late 19th century, a notion that prisons and punishments demonstrated the level of civilization of a country was adopted worldwide.

    1628770973336.png

    Charles George Gordon, 'Major Gordon' in Ottoman garbs

    In 1858, the first Ottoman prison reform took place under the command of Abdulmejid II and Major Gordon, a British military officer who specialized in the treatment and care of prisoners of war. Gordon had been acquainted with the Ottoman Government due to the Crimean War, and was happy to give his services to the empire, though he complained profusely to his British colleagues about ‘the hellish Turkoman’ prisons. Though Gordon unsuccessfully tried to imitate the British and American system to labor prisons in the Ottoman Empire, he successfully managed to reform the Ottoman criminal system by introducing the four-part classification of criminal behavior into the Ottoman Empire – Accused (Zanli), Misdemeanor (Kabahat Sahiplerine), Petty Offence (Erbab-I cunhaya), and Serious Offense (Murtekib-I cinayet).

    Despite these criminal and judicial reforms, the Ottoman Empire during the Tanzimat and Hamidian Era continued to enjoy western level of prisons only in Constantinople. Criminals who were caught by the government often begged to be incarcerated into the Istanbul prisons, which were more like luxurious house arrests compared to the dreadful conditions of other Ottoman prisons throughout the Empire.


    1628771015169.png

    The cover of the Imperial Ottoman Penal Code

    For all that Abdulhamid II was a cruel despot, one of the more major reforms that he had conducted was the 1880 Prison Regulation. The 1880 law forbid prison guards from torturing the prisoners, and had demanded that each district have at least one jail with the standards meeting the nationwide consensus. This system was implemented by 1889, and though other than Constantinople, prisons were still lacking in quality throughout the empire, the situation became much better after the implementation of the 1880 Code. The 1908-09 Revolution had put further prison and criminal reforms that Abdulhamid II had planned to come to a halt, and subsequent governments under the Second Constitutional Era had neglected justice and criminal reforms, leading to the degradation of the quality of Ottoman prisons and the quality of Ottoman justice. [1]

    The new liberal government intended to change that salutary neglect. The Imperial Ottoman Penal Code was updated on the 3rd of October, 1922 to include new offenses and standardized punishments as well. Far more importantly however, the Prison Office within the Ministry of the Interior was made more centralized, with the authority given to the local vilayets stripped, and handed to the Ministry to make it more centralized, and thus easier for the government to implement justice and criminal reforms.

    In step with the continuing Ottoman educational reforms (will be expanded down below), the Ottoman Empire introduced the Prisoner’s Curriculum on the 18th of December, 1922, which provided vocational education for technical subjects to prisoners who wanted to take these courses for prisoner rehabilitation. This was then combined together with a semi-labor regime to aid the rehabilitation program that the Ottomans had built. The Ministry of the Interior also announced that it would conduct random checks of several prisons throughout the empire on a random basis to check whether or not prisons met the standards made by the government. This policy of random checks saw around ~80 prison directors fired from their positions throughout the empire, as several rural prisons showed that they did not meet imperial governmental standards. This forced the local vilayet’s and their governors to take the prison reform seriously, and the local governments began to funnel their budgets into prison reform as much as they could.


    1628771087175.png

    Ottoman forts such as this one in Hejaz which did not meet governmental standards were shut down

    After prison reforms were met, the Ottoman government abolished the two court system of the Ottoman empire entirely. Having separate courts for muslims and non-muslims had been decried a lot of times previously as religiously discriminating and the new government agreed. Religious Courts for Muslims and Christians were allowed to stay and were allowed to have jurisdiction over religious affairs and religious cases in the empire. The new three tiered court system, based on the global example (District Court –State Court-Supreme Court) was adopted for the empire (Sanjak Court – Vilayet Court – Supreme Court). Furthermore, the system of the Serasker, the rough equivalent of police in the Ottoman Empire established by Sultan Mahmud II in 1839 was abolished, and on December 28, 1922, the Imperial Ottoman Gendarmerie was officially established as the police force of the empire and the Imperial Ottoman Firefighter Corps was also established. Previously, the Serasker had taken both duties, which had negated their effectiveness.

    Ottoman Education Reform under Mustafa Kemal and the Liberal Government of 1922.

    The controversial 1922 Education Act made radical changes to the education system of the Ottoman Empire under the command of the new liberal government. The Ottoman Empire till this day is a semi-religious country, where religion plays a very important role in the day to day governance of the empire. As such, creating a secular, yet religious education for the country was a task that required all of the empire’s intellectuals to create.

    The Act removed the legal authority of the Ulema, Orthodox and Coptic Churches from the instituted educational system of the empire, in an attempt to create a secular system of education, yet education of the student’s local religion was taken into deep account, and was made compulsory. This policy outraged the conservative elements of society, muslim and non-muslim alike, and many argued that this portion of the act had to be repealed. However, the government was adamant and stood their ground. The authority of the Ulema, and Churches had made schools subject to high local tax rates, and the school boards had become endemic with corruption. That had stunted the growth of educational expansion throughout the empire. Removing the control meant that the high tax rates could be lowered, which would facilitate extra expansion for education in the empire.

    The act also made secondary education, which had been optional for students until then, compulsory. The Empire’s literacy rate was still quite low on average compared to the rest of Europe, and the country intended to increase said rates by making education compulsory. Secondary education was made compulsory, at least on a part-time basis. This meant that students aged 14-18 received much better education than before. [2]

    Semi-free education was passed through this act as well. Imitating the Islamic Golden Age, in which free education was allowed by madrasas, the Ottoman Empire created the Imperial Education Trust Fund. Families whose children needed the money to fund their education could submit requests in the Ministry of Education. The Ministry of Education would then review the income of the family and the costs of the schools they were trying to enroll in. On that basis the Trust Fund granted a monthly stipend for families to fund their children’s education. This trust fund was largely stimulated and operated by the Education Ministry collecting leftover funds, loans and charities from various religious organizations. The Trust Fund is still in effect to this day.


    1628771138606.png

    Students in the Ottoman Empire

    The act also initiated the 1922 Ottoman Scholarship program. Students receiving above 85% in the Primary School Exams when they were 13, received at least a 75% scholarship to study in secondary schools. The higher the percentile, the higher the scholarship. This incentivized education for many students who were unwilling to progress into secondary education due to a lack of proper funding. And as such, this was a great success of the 1922 Educational Act.

    After the act was passed in October, the government also ordered the Ministry of Education to convene a commission that would be able to compile information on foreign curriculum and compare them with the Ottoman one. The Ottomans wanted the best curriculum that they could formulate to be presented to their students. The countries that were listed to come into supervision for their curriculums were the UK, France, Germany, Austria/Danubia, America and Russia.” The Ottoman Welfare State © 2015




    “Discontent was spreading in Greece. Venizelos had been a wildly popular Prime Minister, and his successes were far from small. He had regained the lost territory of 1897, the Cretan Question had been solved, he had managed to unite Cyprus with Greece (Though the island was still technically under Ottoman suzerainty), and the economy of the nation was growing. Perhaps the most discontent of the Greek people were the nationalists. The Enosis of Cyprus meant that nationalists were all the more eager to try and fulfill the irredentist Greek claims of the Megali Idea. The Ottomans, obviously weren’t in favor of such plans. Venizelos, who had cultivated extremely lucrative relations between Athens and Constantinople, was also rather hesitant about endorsing any idea of war with the Ottoman Empire. He was also adamant in his belief that Greek Territories in the Ottoman Empire should not hinder better relations between the two powers.

    1628771214362.png

    Cypriots celebrating Enosis

    Other political and ideological reasons were also hindering the ruling Liberal Party. Despite the moderation of Venizelos himself, and the mild popularity that the young king George II enjoyed in Greece, many supporters of the Liberal Party were in favor of a republic and the abolition of the monarchy, though not a majority. This alienated the traditional conservatives of Greece. The man had also reigned as Prime Minister for 12 years, and political fatigue was starting to show in the Greek Kingdom. Furthermore, the political question of Cyprus remained. Cyprus was still only a protectorate of Greece, which had been transferred by Britain to the authority of Athens, and technically the island was still under the suzerainty of Abdulmejid II. Greek nationalists wanted the island to take part in the elections directly. However, after the early 1922 Greek Electoral Reform, which re-arranged some seats, and abolished some of the more unnecessary seats in the government and expanded the Hellenic Parliament for more political integration, the island did not receive political representation in the Hellenic Government, and instead the Cyprus Act of 1920 allowed the island to have their own local legislature on the authority of the Hellenic Parliament. Nationalists wanted a re-negotiation of the transfer and to integrate Cyprus directly into Greece, however Venizelos, who did not wish to anger the Ottomans, who had already been distrustful of the transfer of protectorate authority.

    Venizelos, was as they say, kicking the problem of the Cypriot integration down the road. In light of this situation, anti-Venizelist parties were starting to grow. Demetrios Gounaris was the most ardent supporter of anti-Venizelism and was a mildly popular politician in Greece at the time. His political party, the Patriotic Party also had a powerful base of operations in the Peloponnese. But the main opposition to Venizelism came from Alexandros Papanastasiou and his newly formed Agricultural Labor Party. The establishment of this party was of great political importance, as the nascent agrarian movement in Greece found a political party willing to support and represent them.


    1628771256680.png

    Alexandros Papanastasiou

    All of these opposition parties had, despite their secure bases of power, failed to defeat Venizelos and the Liberal Party during the 1918 Greek Legislative Elections. This was because the disunity of the anti-Venizelist tickets made it extremely easy for the Liberal Party to exploit, and the 1918 Elections saw a landslide victory for the Liberals, winning a vast majority of the seats present in the Hellenic Parliament.

    The parties had learned from their mistakes. As the 1922 Legislative Elections beckoned forward, these parties, all united by their opposition to the incumbent prime minister and his political party, formed an electoral alliance called the United Opposition. They were of varying political groups, social democrats, conservatives, centrists, socialists, agrarians etc, but they were united by their opposition to venizelism. Papanastasiou, despite Gounaris’s personal distrust of the man, became the face of the United Opposition politically.

    When the electoral campaign for the 1922 elections started, they quickly became fierce in nature. The Liberals emphasized their position, riding the populist tide by pointing out their territorial expansion in Cyprus, Crete, and the Tymfala Corridor and Preveza. Economically, the Liberals had better success, as under the Venizelist government, the economy of Greece had boomed. The economic arrangement that the Balkan kingdom enjoyed with both the United Kingdom and the Ottoman Empire had allowed the country to fill its coffers, and service industries in the kingdom had grown due to extra ottoman investment as well.

    The united opposition ran on a populist platform, and tried to exploit the political fatigue in the country. They appealed to conservatives about the republicans within the Liberal Party, and they appealed to the socialists and communists by pointing towards Venizelos’s moderation towards the monarchy. Greek republicans, most of whom were in the Liberal camp, found themselves under fire from the conservative and monarchist sections of society when the marriage of George II to Elizabeth of Romania took place with great pomp in Athens, attracting many thousands.

    Despite this concerted effort by the opposition, the Liberal Party managed to win a majority in the newly expanded Hellenic Parliament, winning 203 out of 362 seats. This was a much smaller majority than the one that they had commanded in 1918, and the Opposition parties did increase their portion of the parliament.


    1922 greek elections.png

    After his victory, Venizelos recognized the political danger in front of him, as the elections were much closer than what he had assumed it had been. His new cabinet announced a week after the elections that the government would be corresponding with the government in Constantinople about the Cypriot Question and to end its ambiguity once and for all, allowing it to be directly integrated in the Greek state. On the 16th of December, 1922, George Roussos, the new Minister of Foreign Affairs of Greece, traveled to Constantinople and met with Grand Vizier Mustafa Kemal Pasha and Abdulmejid II asking for dialogue on the Cypriot Question. Whilst Abdulmejid II was in favor of allowing Cyprus to go, considering the Greek protectorate as fait accompli, Mustafa Kemal Pasha was more hesitant, and told the Greek Foreign Minister that a series of round table talks between Athens and Constantinople would be required to solve the issue, as Muslim Cypriots still commanded a significant portion of the Cypriot populace.

    Roussos had no other choice but to accept that decision from the Ottoman Government and asked Constantinople to inform him and Greece of any date that would be convenient for both sides. After this formal arrangement was finished, George II and his newlywed wife, Elizabeth of Romania arrived in the Ottoman Empire in a small state visit designed by Constantinople and Athens to increase bilateral relations. The royal couple was greeted by the Ottoman Imperial Family and welcomed to the empire by the cabinet. The two would go on for a small tour of the Empire through Constantinople, Smyrna, Angora, Beirut, and Jerusalem before returning to Greece.” A Political History of Greco-Ottoman Relations © 2018

    ***

    [1] – Information from Prison Reform in the Late Ottoman Empire: The State’s Perspectives by Kent. F. Schull.
    [2] - based on the 1918 Education Act UK.
     
    Chapter 52: German troubles
  • Osman Reborn

    Chapter 52: German troubles

    ***

    “After six years-worth of economic crisis, the German economy finally reached its inevitable end – collapse. On the 2nd of January, 1923, after years of failing to stabilize the German economy, French and Russian disinterest in stabilizing the central European economy, the German economy collapsed completely. A loaf of bread cost more than trillions of Marks, and the German Mark was completely useless as a currency. Already, the local regions began to stop using their Marks, and issued local currencies, weighted for in local resources. The situation was exceedingly horrible for the normal German person, as they had to resort to a barter system much of the time to get what they needed. The economic crisis also led to the full collapse of the German government. Rosa Luxemburg resigned as Chancellor of Germany and the government went into crisis as the entire cabinet also resigned from the government, after their repeated failures to improve the situation. The governmental crisis was perhaps, only saved by the fact that President Gustav Noske refused to resign, and activated article 9 of the German constitution, allowing him to take emergency powers within the German government.


    1629095327013.png

    President Gustav Noske of Germany

    Despite this economic and political crisis at hand however, the German government was still being forced to pay their war reparations to France and Russia. The worthless German economy made it impossible for Germany to exchange their currency into foreign tender to pay the reparations. The German government, as such, failed to pay the reparations it owed to Russia and France on the 1st of January, 1923. This sparked the Reparations Controversy, as many German politicians wanted to use the economic crisis to end the reparations entirely. Prime Minister Rene Viviani of France was adamant that Germany would have to pay war reparations, or the continued French economic investment in Wurttemburg and the Rhineland would be forfeit. Considering that these French investments were the only substance providing stability to the local economies of the region, losing said investment would have disastrous consequences for the Germans. These French investments also saw food kitchens being made for the economically destitute people in Germany (who were made destitute because of the Great Dive), allowing them to receive proper food and nutrition that was unavailable to them from Berlin. Many in the French government wanted to use the opportunity to occupy the Rhineland, and take all of the industrial produce of the region to make up for the reparations. Whilst Viviani was ardently in support of continuing the reparations, he was, however not in favor of a military solution. He knew very well that the British would not support a military situation and that they supported the German position that the reparations were too high. Whilst Russia would be on board for an occupation, if only to receive the money that it was using to pay for their massive infrastructural uplift schemes. In the French Chamber of Deputies, this position taken by the ruling government came into heavy question, as all of the rightwing parties united in their opposition against Viviani’s decision not to use military force against the German crisis.

    Russia on the other hand, had no qualms about an occupation. The German reparations to Russia was almost as large as their reparations to France. The huge amount of rubles flowing into Russia from Germany was being used by the Russians to build more infrastructure, canals, and commercial services within the Empire. Without said rubles, then their economic and monetary viability would come into question. Despite the misgivings of Russian Prime Minister Sergey Muromstyev, Tsar Nicholas II, no longer constrained by the fact that he didn’t have a cousin ruling Germany, ordered the Russian Army to occupy East Prussia all the way upto the Oder River. On the 16th of January, 1923, the Russians entered Eastern Prussia, with absolutely no military resistance, as Noske had reluctantly ordered the 200,000-man strong German army to let the Russians enter without a fight. Noske didn’t really want to fight the Russians, knowing very well that if the Russians wanted they could occupy all of the country. It was however, a heavy hit to his prestige as President of Germany. Rudolf Heinze, for example, decried this action, and publically called upon countries like Britain and the neutral powers like Sweden, Ottomans and Austrians to intervene in the current controversy. The British were unhappy with the occupation for one good reason – the Russians had done it. This blatant occupation could only have taken place if the Russians were sure that they would not face proper repercussions from anyone. They also did it, in the view of the British, to project power, showing the world that Russian troops were in the heart of Germany, and as such, Central Europe. The British, and upon British pressuring, the Ottomans protested against the occupation diplomatically asking the Russians to withdraw.


    belgian occupation zone.PNG

    The Belgian occupation of the German Rhine 1923-24.

    Belgium’s response to the crisis, however, soured any sort of action that London could take. Prime Minister George Theunis was a moderate right-wing politician in Belgium, however, the crisis that was enveloping Central Europe meant that Belgium had the opportunity to gain more economic leverage than what was thought possible. Goaded on by Minister of Finance, Aloys Van de Vyvere, and Minister of Defense, Albert Deveze, one week after the Russians occupied German East Prussia, 80,000 Belgian troops entered the German Rhineland, and occupied the region from Aachen to Trier, joining Russia in an economic occupation of the Germans. This was the final nail in the coffin, and Noske declared that after a new government was formed, he would resign, over failures of foreign policy. Rudolf Heinze, being the only man daring enough for the job in this desperate situation in Germany, accepted the offer to become Chancellor, and he formed a new government with his right-wing parties and alliances becoming the ruling government. Noske then resigned on the 7th of February and was replaced by Ernst Scholz as the President of the German Republic.

    1629095507278.png

    Polish troops of the Russian Army during the Occupation of Germany 1923-24

    Heinze, for all his bluster, knew that he could do little to try and even stop the Russians and Belgians. He could, in theory, push the Belgians out of Germany, however that would invoke the wrath of London, who had taken a wait-and-see approach after the Belgians intervened. As such, he encouraged civil disobedience and passive resistance against the occupation and immediately started to look for economic solutions to the crisis, convening a national commission made up of Austrians, Germans, Bavarians, Danes, and British to find a proper solution. Heinze would go onto stabilizing the economy by the end of the year, however, the damage was done. The specter of Guildism now loomed over Germany.” The Rise of the Third German State © 1987



    “The 1921 Census of Cyprus counted that 26% of the population were Turkish Cypriots whilst the remainder were in the vast majority Greeks, with small communities of Armenians, Maronites and Arabs sprinkled in between. The Turks as a result, made up the second largest ethnic group within Cyprus. The transfer of the Cypriot Protectorate from Britain to Greece re-affirmed their rights, and their religious situation, and allowed a small free movement area between Cyprus and the Ottoman Empire be established, allowing for Turkish Cypriots to return to the mainland if they wanted. The Cypriot Question, however, had become a boiling issue in Greek politics, and after the 1922 Greek Legislative Elections, the Greek government officially asked for negotiations with Constantinople regarding the issue. On February 6, 1923, the Greek delegation arrived in Constantinople to begin negotiations with the Ottoman Empire.

    1629095579849.png

    The Ottoman Delegations during the Constantinople Accords 1923.

    Legally, the King of Greece, the Greek Head of State, was not the head of state of Cyprus, and the Ottoman Sultan remained the head of state of Cyprus. Abdulmejid II was of the opinion that if the rights of the Turkish Cypriots and Muslim community of the island had their rights guaranteed by the Greeks, then the island’s protectorate could easily be abolished. However, the Ottoman government knew that the issue was much more nuanced than simply guaranteeing the rights of the islanders and handing them over to the Greeks. Many Greek and Ottoman politicians were of the opinion that the Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots were incompatible with one another. The Greek Cypriots controlled the vast majority of the wealth of the island, and the Turkish Cypriots, the vast majority of whom were farmers, controlled the vast majority of the land as their owners. This contrast led to two opposing groups within Cyprus, the Greek and Turks to favor Enosis and Taksim respectively. Enosis was of course the ideology of uniting with Greece, whilst Taksim was an ideology of the Turkish Cypriots, asking for union with the Ottoman Empire, or partitioning the island between the Ottomans and Greeks based on ethnic lines. To their credit, neither Mustafa Kemal Pasha nor Venizelos believed that a partition or annexation that alienated the other ethnicities was a viable option to take. That said, there were pro-Ottoman Greeks in Cyprus, though they were overshadowed by the majority, who wanted union with Greece. The Ottomans had always been generally friendly to the Cypriots, re-establishing the dominance of the Greek Orthodox Church in Cyprus that had been robbed by the Venetians and by abolishing serfdom, whilst also slowly expelling the Latin elite from the island. These pro-Ottoman Greek Cypriots were however cherry picking historical facts. The Ottomans were both friendly and aggressive regarding Cyprus historically, with periodic prosperous and poor periods, both happening under the rule of the Ottomans.

    The Ottoman government wished to make sure that the events in Crete were not repeated. Though the Cretan Turks were allowed full rights on paper, they were still extremely discriminated, and from 11% of the population, they had been reduced to a mere 5% of the population, with most immigrating to the Ottoman Empire and Egypt. The Ottoman government blamed that Greece, who had given her word to previous Grand Vizier, Ibrahim Hakki Pasha, had not abided by their part of the bargain. The Greek government, for their part, had in fact tried to enforce equality as agreed by the Treaty of Salonika, however whilst governments had a great degree of control, they could not control the minds of people. As nationalistic euphoria swept Crete after they reunited with Greece, ethnic minorities such as the Cretan Turks became natural targets for nationalistic chauvinism. Mustafa Kemal wanted assurances that such events would not take place in Cyprus. The Greek government, of course, could not give guarantees that such events would not take place, considering they could not control the people. Whilst Mustafa Kemal himself pushed a hardline stance during the negotiations, Ottoman Foreign Minister, Faisal Al-Hashemi, was much more moderate. He demanded that proper actions take place against instigators of such actions, and demanded that even with the Greeks annexing Cyprus, the Ottomans would have a say in Cypriot politics.


    1629095629470.png

    Ottoman Foreign Minister, Faisal Al-Hashemi

    The last demand was of course, unacceptable to the Greeks, though they decided to be moderate, and the Greeks presented the Consulate Plan, wherein, the Ottoman government would be able to construct consulates in Cyprus, in the same manner as how the Greeks had consulates within almost every Greek majority Ottoman city. This plan was a grudgingly acceptable one for the Ottomans, as it meant that the Ottomans would still have a proper diplomatic presence on the island. After this was accepted by the Ottomans, very reluctantly, the Ottomans put forward their own negotiation agenda. Devolution of power. Devolution of power was something that the Ottomans intended to push through within the Cypriot sphere, so as to allow the Cypriot Turks to retain their political status within the island. Devolution is a system of providing sizeable federal like autonomous powers for provinces and districts of a de-jure unitary state like the Kingdom of Greece. Legislation created by the parliaments or sub-legislatures of the devolved states could be repealed or amended by the national legislature without constitutional dispute.

    Many Greeks were opposed to this, despite Venizelos’s personal support for the idea. Venizelos personally believed that a local assembly or parliament for Cyprus would do wonders to heal the political divide between the several ethnicities of the island, and preserve stability in the region. However, on the 8th of February, after several renegotiations between the Ottoman and Greek delegations, most of the Greek diplomats accepted the issue of devolution most reluctantly. Finally, the final issue regarding Cyprus was that of economics. The Greek protectorate had preserved the British tariff rates and custom duties, however being directly integrated within the Greek state meant that Cyprus would be subject to Greek rates, which would make Ottoman investments in Cyprus slightly unsustainable, as the entirety of Ottoman investments in the region was based and structured on the previous tariff and custom rates. The Ottomans wanted the tariff and custom duties in Cyprus to remain the same, and to come under the authority of the devolved legislature. The Greeks, who knew they stood to lose economically if the Ottomans withdrew their investments from Cyprus, agreed to this issue handily. With all of these problems and nuances resolved on the 9th of February, 1923, the Accords of Constantinople 1923 was signed with the following points:-


    • Article 1 ended the protectorate of Cyprus formally and annexed it into the Kingdom of Greece.
    • Article 2 – 4 guaranteed the rights of the Turkish and Muslim Cypriot population, and their right of political, religious, and ethnic freedom.
    • Article 5 - 8 established the Parliament of Cyprus which was to be a unicameral devolved parliament of Cyprus, consisting of 120 seats, with 30 seats reserved for Turkish Cypriots, 10 seats reserved for other minorities of the island. The articles also specified the legislative powers, and limitations of the parliament.
    • Article 9 guaranteed that 25% of the seats in the Hellenic Parliament that would be given to Cyprus would be reserved for Turkish Cypriots.
    • Article 10 – 12 dealt with the economic issues of the transfer, and guaranteed that the same tariff and custom duties would remain in place within Cyprus for a time period of 10 years.
    • Article 13 – 15 guaranteed the right of the Ottoman government to open consulates in Cyprus to maintain their diplomatic presence on the island.
    After the Accords were signed, the Ottoman Parliament, even the CUP, voted to ratify the Accords, being mostly satisfied with the several concessions wrangled from the Greeks. The Greek parliament, happy to see the issue of the Cypriots over, also ratified the Accords. Sultan Abdulmejid II formally and publically renounced his role as Suzerain of Cyprus on the 18th of February, 1923, and the Ottoman Flag which flew side by side the Greek flag in Nicosia was brought down after the Ottoman National Anthem was sung in Nicosia one last time in a ceremony of the transfer of power. As the new Cypriot legislature was formed, plans for the first elections in Cypriot history began to form. The first Cypriot General Elections would take place in the ending months of 1923, as the Cypriot Issue was tentatively considered over.

    1629095718186.png

    Insignia of the Devolved Cypriot Parliament.

    Though many of the compromises reached were not liked by either the Greeks or the Ottomans, it spoke highly of the decade of good relations between Constantinople and Athens. Nationalists in both countries decried the concessions given to the other, however Greece and the Ottoman Empire were now firmly behind their antagonistic past. Though some tensions remained, the two countries after the Accords of Constantinople, for all intents and purposes de-facto allies, even though that state of affairs would only become de-jure during the Second Great War.” The Greco-Ottoman Rapprochement: Historic Antagonism vs Modern Alliance; A Case Study © 2017


    “The 1920 Treaty of Seeb for all intents and purposes separated the Sultanate of Oman/Muscat from the Imamate of Oman completely, with British backing. However, in 1923, the economic situation changed the perception of the British regarding the Omani issue. The British had since 1921, allowed the Ottomans to enter Oman, who were looking for oil and natural gas in the region. In 1922, the Omani Sultan, Taimur bin Feisal allowed the Anglo-Ottoman Arabian Oil Company to have a monopoly over the Omani natural gas and oil prospects. The Ottomans and the British concluded that whilst prospective oil fields within Oman were highly likely, they would be too deep to drill them out for a good period of time. Oman’s natural gas, however was a different story. The border between the Imamate and the Sultanate consisted of various gas reserves that could be exploited immediately if the tribal conflict in the region was resolved.

    Taimur saw an opportunity to unite the nation, and he took it. Preying upon the Ottoman and British disappointment that the gas fields were at the disputed and heavily contested border, he presented himself as an alternative and asked for aid in his endeavor to unite the nation. If, the British and Ottomans aided him, he told London and Constantinople, then the gas fields were all theirs, with of course, a percentage of the profit going to his coffers. The British and Ottomans pounced on this opportunity. The British provided the Sultan with the weapons, and the Ottomans provided the Sultan with proper generals and military officers. On March 23, 1923, with these advantages piled up for him, he invaded the Imamate of Oman.


    1629095761403.png

    Sultan Taimur bin Feisal

    For their part, the Imamate of Oman was not blind to the danger it was soon finding itself in. The Imam, Muhammad ibn Abdullah Al Khalili knew the moment that gas fields were found in the border region that the Muscat Sultanate would prey upon it. He began to lobby internationally for weapons and training. He found covert aid in the form of the Republic of Inner Arabia and the Russian Empire. Moreso the former than the latter. The Russian Government itself didn’t sanction a proper intervention in the region, but their growing economic apparatus in the region meant that despite their neutrality on the issue, Russian weapons did find their way through into Imam hands. The Inner Arabians supported the Imamate heavily though. They sent supplies, weapons and even some volunteer battalions were transferred from Ha’il all the way into the Imamate after crossing hundreds of kilometers of treacherous deserts. Around 600 Arabian veterans were sent by the republic to aid the Imamate. Al-Khalili knew that even with the aid he was receiving, his forces would not be able to defeat the Muscat forces, supplied and supported as they were by the British and Ottoman government. He decided to swap strategy as result. When the Muscat forces crossed the border, his troops withdrew, and using the Al-Hajar Mountain Range to his advantage, began a massive guerilla campaign against the invading Muscat forces.

    The Wars of Omani Unification thus began, over a gas dispute.” Unification of Oman: 1921 – 1943 © 2000



    “As the five ear tenure of the 1918 parliament was coming to an end, all of the major political parties in the United Kingdom began their political campaigns in the country, hoping to gain the mandate of the House of Commons. The most glaring issue in the election was regarding the Russo-Belgian occupation of the German territories. The Labour Party and the Liberal Party were extremely agitated by the move, even more so than the ruling conservative minority government. Furthermore, Chamberlain, whilst a great diplomat, and a great administrator, Chamberlain’s government had glossed over domestic issues for meddling in the international arena. Furthermore, domestic pressure was starting to build up in the country regarding the issue of One Person, One Vote. Whilst the Representation of the People Act 1917 gave more than 8.4 million women the right to vote in the United Kingdom, becoming the final reform act regarding suffrage, it had failed to address the fact that 7% of the population still had plural voting rights, and the fact that many middle class men were allowed an extra vote due to the university constituencies. The growing political movement in the United Kingdom opposed this system of plural voting, wherein 10% to 15% of the population were allowed to vote more than once.

    1629095969437.png

    a one man one vote badge from the 1923 General Elections

    Whilst the British economy was also doing pretty well, it was stagnating, as Chamberlain gave heavier emphasis on foreign policy and imperial policy rather than domestic economic policies. This allowed both the Liberals and Labour Parties to capitalize on this fact. The Liberals used Reginald McKenna, their leader’s economic prowess during the Great War to further their own propaganda during the general elections, and the Labour Party used several Democratic Socialist slogans to garner attention within the British Isles. Economically, the Conservatives were crippled during the campaign from the start. They had been funneling several foreign programs, such as the board and commission that oversaw the Anglo-Ottoman Alliance from their own pockets, and as such, the Labour and Liberal Parties were able to fund their political electoral campaign in a much better manner than the Conservatives and Liberal Unionists. Regarding policy as well, both the Liberals and Labour Parties attacked the Conservatives and Liberal Unionists for their inability to stop the Occupation of Germany. Many members believed that giving Belgium too much leeway would only backfire onto the British, and their agreement with the Russians, which all three of the main parties agreed was a major threat to British supremacy, was only going to embolden the Russians into provocation against the United Kingdom further. Thankfully for the Liberal Party, McKenna also knew that he could peddle the federalist angle that he had used in 1918. Federalism as an ideology was popular in Ireland, but extremely unpopular in Ulster, Wales, England and Scotland. He instead, promised further powers for local councils and boroughs to increase their administrative and economic efficiency.

    Labour also made significant gains with the increasing industrialization of the country. Britain had started to increase their funding of industrial programs within Ireland, and even in northern Wales, and as a result, the increasing working class meant that the Labour Party stood to gain the most from the increasing industrial policies of the government during elections. Labour also managed to increase their presence in Ireland, as a result of the IPP becoming more inward looking. As the Irish Parliament Party held a very powerful majority over the Irish Commons, the party was more focused on local elections, and as a result, money left for campaigning for a general election was pitifully small. Furthermore, the party’s representative in the Westminster Government, Devlin had retired from official national level politics and had become involved in the Irish Home Rule Government. His successor, John Dillon was widely respected, but he didn’t hold the same charisma or electoral campaigning ability that his predecessor had. This meant that the Irish were looking increasingly more at the main 3 parties instead. As the Conservative Party had changed their position on Irish Home Rule, Irish folk, many of whom were conservative in their outlook, started to vote for the Conservatives again. Irish Liberals, mainly from the North and Central belt began to cast their votes in favor of McKenna and his liberal trading policy, which would benefit the commerce heavy regions of Central Ireland. Finally, the heavily industrialized Dublin, and Cork areas began to cast their votes in favor of Labour. The IPP continued to hold a monopoly over the majority of Irish votes, but it was clear to everyone that said monopoly was slowly coming to a close.


    1629095848858.png

    Edwin Scrymgeour, the powerful Scottish backer of the British Constitutionalists

    The National Labour Party, which was meant to be a haven for leftists who had rightist tendencies and rightists who had leftist tendencies also splintered apart in 1920 after their leader George Barnes died of tuberculosis. The party fractured only rightist and leftist lines almost immediately after the death. Barnes had been the only one holding the party together, and with him gone, unity in the party was functionally at rock bottom. From the National Labour Party, two parties emerged. The British Constitutionalist Party and the Social Democratic Party led by Donald Howard and Christopher Addison respectively. The British Constitutionalist Party was fundamentally a center-right political party that found its basis on Christian Democracy and Prohibitionist tendencies. A moderately conservative party, it was founded on the economic principle of a social market economy. The party generally center and center-left economically, whilst also being an ardent unionist party within Scotland and Ireland. It founded itself as a moderately, but not overly so, skeptical party of birth control, and homosexuality. However, whilst the party was moderately socially conservative, only the main Conservative Party of the UK, the party also held a reconciliatory position regarding immigration, especially from the British Empire’s colonies. The party allied itself with two minor parties, the National Prohibition Party and the Scottish Prohibition Party and garnered the aid of Edwin Scrymgeour, a prominent Scottish prohibitionist politician. The party also gained the support of Axel Gustafson, a Swedish-American that was very involved in British politics at the time. The Social Democratic Party on the other hand, stood on the principle of being the fundamental social democratic party of the UK. They dismissed the claims that Labour was the Social Democratic Party, instead labelling it as Democratic Socialist. The ideological differences between Democratic Socialist and Social Democratic are subject to debate, but they did differ a lot in economic policy. The Social Democratic Party made an increase the social welfare of the country a key target. The Social Democratic party also attracted some socially conservative, economically left voters when they became one of the very first Social Democratic Parties in Europe to shed their association with Marxism. They publically endorsed the British Monarchy, calling George V the father of the nation, and endorsed the traditional British values as well. They generally endorsed social policy reform as their compromise between capitalism and socialism.

    British General Elections wikibox 1923.png

    When the election results finally came, the Liberals had won the most seats in Parliament, winning 259 seats, though still shy of a majority. The Conservatives lost 32 seats, whilst Labour made the most gains in parliament, winning 131 seats, making gains in Scotland, Wales and Ireland after their traditional English strongholds. The IPP decreased their mandate, losing 2 seats to Labour and 1 seat to the Liberals. The British Constitutionalist Party and the Social Democratic Party did surprisingly well for new parties that were formed after a split in a former party, winning 21 and 13 seats respectively. The Conservatives wanted to exploit the hung parliament, however this time Adamson and McKenna came to an agreement quickly, and formed a new coalition government. The new coalition government consisted of:-
    Prime Minister and Leader of the House of Commons: Reginald McKenna (Lib)
    Chancellor of the Exchequer: William Adamson (Lab)
    Lord Chancellor and Leader of the House of Lords: Lord Haldane (Lib)
    Foreign Secretary: Sir Edward Grey (Lib)
    Secretary of State for the Colonies: The Marques of Crewe (Lib)
    Lord Privy Seal and Deputy Leader of the House of Commons: Ramsay MacDonald (Lab)
    Home Secretary: Herbert Samuel (Lib)
    Secretary of State for War: Stephen Walsh (Lab)
    Secretary of State for India: Graham White (Lib)
    Secretary for Scotland: Harold Tennant (Lib)
    Chief Secretary for Ireland: Thomas Johnson (Lab)
    Secretary for Air: The Earl of Crawford (Lib)
    First Lord of the Admiralty: Winston Churchill (Lib)
    Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster: Thomas McKinnon Wood (Lib)
    President of the Board of Trade: Walter Runciman (Lib)
    Minister of Agriculture: Arthur Henderson (Lab)
    President of the Board of Education: Charles Philipps Trevelyan (Lab)
    Postmaster General: Joseph Pease (Lib)
    First Commissioner of the Works: Lewis Harcourt (Lib)
    Minister of Labour: Margaert Bondfield (Lab)
    Minister of Health: John Wheatley (Lab)

    The new cabinet was most peculiarly formed with one woman within it, heralding the first female cabinet member in the United Kingdom. As the 1923 General Elections ended, the UK didn’t know it yet, but it was entering a new political era.” The Era of Progressive Conservatism © 1994

    ***
     
    Chapter 53: The Johnson Incident
  • Osman Reborn

    Chapter 53: The Johnson Incident



    “The moment Cyprus was directly integrated into the Kingdom of Greece with a devolved parliament, Prime Minister Venizelos of Greece began to prepare the island for its first devolved elections. On the 4th of April, 1923, he created the ministerial position of Chief Minister for Cypriot Affairs, which would act as the head of the devolved Cypriot government. This was again met with some resistance from the United Opposition, who favored a more direct and unitary tie with the Cypriots, however, with the Liberal majority in the Hellenic Parliament, the ministerial position was established with governmental support. The next day, Venizelos announced that on the 28th of June, 1923, the first devolved elections of Cyprus would take place. This inevitably led to political alliances within the island cropping up.

    1630500270088.png

    A statue of Christodoulos Sozos

    The most prominent and by far the most powerful and influential politician in Cyprus at the time was Christodoulos Sozos. Sozos had been born to a Cretan freedom fighter, who had fought in the Cretan Revolt of 1866 – 69. He studied law in Athens and worked as a lawyer before moving back to the Ottoman Empire and starting his political career in the Cypriot legislature in 1901. He was in favor of union with Greece, however he recognized that the rights of the large Turkish, and visible Arab, Maronite and Armenian minorities also needed to be respected, and in 1903, he proclaimed that union with Greece needed to happen with the rights and autonomy of the island respected. At the time, this declaration had brought with it significant criticism, however time proved Sozos correct, as the 1923 Accords affirmed Cypriot autonomy, even as a part of Greece. Sozos’s influence in Cyprus only grew during the Balkan War of 1915, when he volunteered as a part of the Cypriot Volunteers, a group of two regiments who volunteered to fight on part of the Ottoman Empire. Sozos and the Ottomans had no little love lost between them, however Sozos quickly recognized that gaining the support of a resurgent Ottoman Empire was within his best interests. Commanding the second regiment, he distinguished himself in the Bulgarian Theatre, and was instrumental in the small yet significant Battle of Pirdop against the Bulgarian Redshirts. Sozos, having affirmed his nominal loyalty to the Sultan, receiving state pensions from Constantinople, which he used to further his political ambitions in Cyprus. During the negotiations between Greece and the Ottoman Empire, Sozos had fervently supported the accords and its solution.

    With this powerful political history behind him, on the 9th of April, 1923, he called for a meeting of his political allies in Limassol. While the vast majority of his allies were Greek Cypriots, he had a good number of Turkish, Arab and Armenian supporters as well. Within this meeting, he proclaimed the foundation and establishment of the Cypriot Democratic Party. The CDP, which is the precursor to the modern Cypriot Rally Party, was a fundamentally center-left political party, and followed most center-left foundations. The party most especially presented itself as a cross-ethnic party that declared that it would work in the interests of all Cypriots, regardless of ethnicity. They also regarded the autonomy of the island as something that was essential and needed to be guarded. Though despite this cross-ethnic rhetoric, the majority of the party’s supporters would remain to be Greek Cypriots, though Armenians largely voted in favor of the party as well.

    The largest opposition to this massive political party was Mehmet Aziz’s Turkish Cypriot Democratic Union (TCDU). Mehmet Aziz was a young man of only 31 in 1923, and he was mostly known throughout Cyprus for his medical and health activities, which had uplifted the health situation of the island under British rule. He was charismatic, knew how to speak Turkish, Greek, English and French and was a polymath by all measures of the word. The TCDU was established for the sole purpose of safeguarding the autonomy of the Turkish Cypriots on the island. Other than that, it largely followed a center-right ideological foundation, and despite their differences, Aziz affirmed that it was pro-Sozos in its outlook regarding Cypriot autonomy, stating that Cypriot autonomy was going to be the very enshrining factor of Cypriot politics. Aziz likewise stated that in time, the party would have to evolve into cross-ethnic lines, but for the moment affirmed the Turkish nature of the political party. While a group of Islamic politicians on the island largely agreed with Aziz and his outlook, they disagreed with him regarding the entire situation of Cyprus, and they broke with the party early on, forming the Islamic Nationalist Party. The INP was founded on the basis that the union with Greece was illegitimate and that either a return to Ottoman/British rule or total independence would be preferred. Their outlook, led by the moderation islamist Aras Pasha, son of former Ottoman Grand Vizier Kamil Pasha (who was of Cypriot origins), was based on Islamic democracy, and remained firm in their belief that islam and democracy could co-exist with one another.

    Another party that was somewhat similar to the INP was the National Front, founded by Nikaloas Katalanos, Sozos’s most fervent rival. Katalanos was supportive of Enosis with Greece, however denounced the autonomy of the island, and demanded that the island’s autonomy be abolished, without devolution having taken place. The National Front, like its name implied, was also a proponent and follower of Hellenic Nationalism. The party though led through by democratic principles, managed to alienate basically every single ethnic minority in the island with their greek nationalist rhetoric and found little to no support from the other minorities. The only main political party that was represented in the Hellenic Parliament that managed to come onto Cypriot ballots was the Liberal Party. The Liberal Party opened their own branch on the island, and Greek military leader and war hero Stylianos Gonatas, who had some distant links with Cypriot Greeks through his mother, became its leader within the island. Other than being a regional party, and supporting the autonomy of the island, the party was basically the same as that of its larger sister party in Athens.


    1630500330797.png

    Greco-Turkish victims of Ethnic riots during the elections

    Despite the best efforts of both the populace and the Greek government in trying to maintain the peace on the island, the election campaign was however wrought with ethnic tensions and ethnic lynches taking place. The Turkish minority, mostly aided by the Arabs, believed that the Greek Cypriots wanted to rob the newly found autonomy of the island, whilst the Greek Cypriots believed that it was the ‘added baggage’ of the Turkish Cypriots that prevented them from ‘true’ union with Greece. Most civilians kept these feelings to themselves, however for the radical populace, they had no qualms about showing their dissatisfaction, often in violent ways. Greek sectors of Turkish majority towns were attacked, and the same was the case for Turkish sectors of Greek majority towns. The Greek Government and the Greek Police managed to mostly bring the situation under control, however there were still incidents in which the violence reached tipping points.

    The most famous example would be the assassination of independent MP Emre Avagyan, a Turko-Armenian Cypriot who managed to win a seat from Nicosia. After the election results were published, the supporters of his rival during the election within the constituency had the man assassinated in broad daylight when the man was eating in a small French owned café in Nicosia. The result was public outrage in the Turkish community of the island, and within the Ottoman Empire as well, where the ottoman press had a field day regarding the assassination. The assassins were duly captured and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Greeks fortunately, which staved off any Ottoman intervention regarding the elections.


    1923 Cypriot Elections.png

    As for the elections themselves, Sozos’s party managed to win 64 of the 120 contestable seats, and he was as such elected the first Chief Minister of Cypriot Affairs and he quickly formed a devolved cabinet for Cyprus. The Greek Government recognized the legitimacy of the elections confirmed his position as Chief Minister. This bloody yet democratic process of elections would set the precedent for 25 years’ worth of bloody and deadly politics within Cyprus, and heralded the beginning of the Cypriot Political Troubles.” – Pg 89 – 93 of The Cypriot Troubles: The Political War of Ethnicities



    “As the Ottoman Economy grew at significant strides, trying to overcome their previous economic capitulations to European powers, a much-overshadowed part of Ottoman Economic History would be the influence of the Ottoman Economy beyond Ottoman borders. In particular, the growing economies of Latin America intrigued the Ottoman Nation as it entered the third decade of the 20th century.

    Ottoman interest in Latin America began in the Spanish War of Succession, when the Ottomans finally managed to wrangle Spanish rights to trade in their empire’s ports. Blockaded as the Spanish were in the war, they had been forced to turn the Ottomans as an alternative for trade. For religious reasons, Ottoman trade in Latin America within Spain’s empire was still limited, but despite that, it had started nonetheless. Amazonian wood was a luxurious item in the Ottoman Empire, and the Ottomans in return for high quality wood and wool from Spanish colonies, have them ample supplies of tobacco and diamonds. This system collapsed in the early 1800s, when the Spanish Empire collapsed in Latin America, however said collapse was beneficial to the ottomans, as the religious limits and quotas on Ottoman trade put in place by Madrid was lifted by most of the successor states. However due to the century of decline in the 1800s, the Ottomans did not manage to fully exploit this newfound advantage that they could have used to further their own economic advances. But that situation was changing by the 1920s, and the Ottomans were a recovering power. They dared not challenge any of the highest great powers such as Russia, Britain, or France, but they were a resurgent great power, and they had their eyes on Latin American economies as a result.

    Latin America, however would prove to be a profitable, yet tough nut for the Ottoman Political Economic influence in the region. Though the Ottomans made good advances into Latin American economies, it was clear that Britain and the United States of America dominated the political economies of Latin America. Britain through their Informal Empire, and America through its Monroe Doctrine had virtually monopolized Latin American markets without room for any outside competitor. This was good for London and Washington, but bad for Constantinople, as they had little to no room to maneuver in that setting. This state of affairs however changed when the Anglo-Ottoman Alliance was signed, as now, the Ottomans had a clear entry point into the Latin American political economies. Despite the unsavory behavior of the Brazilian dictatorship led by Hermes de Fonseca, the Brazilians proved to be reconciliatory with the Ottomans economically and with rubber prices returning to normal standards in Brazil, the Ottomans opened their market to the Brazilians once again. Brazil, which had been slowly shunned for their over exuberant oligarchy by both Washington and London found a new investor in the Ottoman Empire. [1]

    This was beneficial to Constantinople, and with a fresh investment friendly nation supporting them, Ottoman business’s in Latin America began to disperse into the continent to find new opportunities of investment and economic development. Like the British, the Ottomans found themselves most used in Latin America as the profitable international banker. Starting from 1921, the Ottoman government began to project itself as an up and coming economic power that could be trusted more so than the old imperialistic powers of the USA and Europe. While of course most latin American businesses were wary of this claim, considering the Ottomans put their interest rate much lower than said other powers, the Ottomans began to become one of the most sought after loaners for the Latin American Economies. The first country to take an Ottoman loan was none other than Mexico, who had been aided by the Ottomans during the last stages of the Mexican Revolution. Following Mexico, Argentina, Chile, Peru all soon began to loan heavily from the Ottoman government and economy, giving the Ottomans a mildly influential say in all of these country’s political apparatus. And while Ottoman immigration into South America had been extremely limited compared to Europe, a small yet noticeable community of Ottoman immigrants was present in countries such as Argentina and Chile [2] which furthered Ottoman interests in said countries.


    1630500440566.png

    Cars parked next to an Ottoman Bank in Buenos Aires, Argentina c. 1922

    Ottoman investments in Latin America by the end of 1923 was lackluster in comparison to the British Empire, which controlled 138 railway companies, 61 shipping and port companies, 41 nitrate companies, 29 petroleum companies, 93 farming companies, 35 commercial banks, 53 manufacturing companies by the start of 1924 [3]. However, whilst the Ottomans liked to compare themselves with British in Latin America, they were not a second, America was the only comparable investor in Latin America with Great Britain. Following the Americans were the French and subsequently the Russians. It was the Ottomans who held the fifth position, and though their economical position in Latin America would grow extremely strong in the following decades, in 1923, they were a distant fifth and only starting to get off the ground. It was in this manner, that the so-called Ottoman Sphere in Latin America began to grow and develop in the 1920s.” – Pg 189-192 of Ottoman Latin America: A Social, Economic, Political History.



    “Though Rene Viviani is today thought off as one of France’s best Prime Ministers and called the Father of Modern French Society, in 1923, his political position, which had been powerful for nine years, was crumbling and crumbling fast. His indecision regarding the German default on the reparations and the subsequent Russo-Belgian occupation of parts of Germany had given the opposition, filled with rightist’s ample ammunition against him. Even his own political party – the Radical Party (PRRRS) was outraged at the lackluster showing by the French Prime Minister in the German Crisis. Of course, Viviani had his own reasons for being more focused on other events; such as labor issues in Bordeaux, and strengthening the French economy (in particular his New Economic Directive of 1922 would be hailed as an economic masterpiece), however despite his successes in the economy and the social issues of France, they were all ignored in favor of his foreign policy failure against the German Crisis. Viviani was resolute in his belief that the Germans would pay their reparations, however he was unwilling to send the army in unlike both Belgium and Russia.

    1630500522477.png

    Rene Viviani, the French Prime Minister

    Viviani did not wish for another continental war, and though Germany was weak and a shadow of its former Imperial self, it could still put up a bloody fight if they needed. Viviani had no intention of allowing another 800,000 Frenchmen die and he did not wish for a general worldwide crisis over the issue to develop. As a result, he obstinately refused to use military action to receive German reparations. On the 5th of April, 1923 he successfully negotiated with the new German President, Ernst Scholz, regarding the reparations. The reparations were reduced by 3% (small in hindsight, but a massive breather of the Germans in 1923), and managed to lower interest rates in the reparations, allowing the Germans to pay the reparations in a much better and efficient manner. This was an economic achievement and had Viviani been able to capitalize on this diplomatic and economic victory it was likely that he would have remained in power. However, a personal loss, the death of his son-in-law in a train accident in Picardy the same day hit him hard. His daughter had died in 1914, and he had been close with his son-in-law. And now he was the only family left for his grandson and granddaughter. Taking advantage of this emotional attack against him, Viviani’s enemies began to coalesce against him as well.

    Viviani was a centrist socialist, and the left within the PRRRS itself was angered by Viviani’s positions, and began to conspire against him by allying themselves with the Miscellaneous Right and the other leftist political parties. In particular, Ludovic-Oscar Frossard, the leader of SFIO rose to the occasion and used his considerable influence in denouncing and attacking Viviani politically in the French Chamber of Deputies. Xavier de Magallon, the leader of the new moderate Action Francaise was even more voracious in his political attacks against the French Prime Minister and on the 23rd of April, 1923, he finally managed to open a vote of no confidence against the French Premier. The vote was a foregone conclusion. With 53 deputies abstaining in their vote, Viviani was ousted 349 – 201 during the vote of no confidence. However, as his party held an overall majority in the Chamber of Deputies after the 1921 Legislative Elections, he managed to make sure that a new election did not happen, as he rightly believed that a new election would not be conductive to the political stability of the nation.


    1630500568184.png

    Xavier de Magallon, the man who ousted Viviani from power.

    Unfortunately, Viviani, the moment he found out who his successor would be, could not manage to stop the transfer of power. In the contingent election that followed within the PRRRS, Viviani’s faction crumbled, and Francois Albert’s faction within the party came out victorious as a result. Albert was by all rights, a perfect minister of labor, and he had been instrumental in the labor reforms that France had been undergoing ever since 1921. However, his social, foreign and economic positions were dangerous for the stability of the Third French Republic. He was an affirmed anti-clerical, and he had resigned as Senator in 1920, when France had re-established its embassy in the Vatican. This was a dangerous position to hold within a country where the Vatican was extremely popular and extremely tired of anti-clericalism. And while Albert was unwilling to intervene militarily in Germany like Viviani, he was more than willing to use the military to spook and intimidate the Germans. Furthermore, he was also slightly pro-Italian, which irritated the populace that lived alongside the Franco-Italian border, and his nationalization schemes weren’t popular with the rightist segment of society at all. The stage for political discourse and political instability was ripe.

    1630500604779.png

    Francois Albert, Viviani's successor

    On April 29, 1923, Albert ascended to the premiership of France, and began to recreate the government as per he and his allies’ goals. He was extremely gifted in the art of administration and labor issues, but he quickly showed a stubbornness that was a dangerous precedent in politics. He brought forward a bill that would basically cut off ties between the Papacy and France once again on the 10th of May, however this was met with fierce resistance from the French populace, with hundreds and thousands, especially in Brittany and Southern France coming out to protest against the bill. With the support of Christian Republicans and the Right, the bill was shot down. However, the damage was done. The Christian Communists of Italy were far from amused, and considering that the Vice-Premier of Italy, Giacomo Matteotti was a Christian Communist, relation between Rome and Paris was harmed. Britain was also far warier of a Prime Minister that willing to intimidate the Germans, and issued soft and subtle diplomatic warnings to Paris. The Premiership of Francois Albert would signal the beginning of the Era of Impermanence in French history.” – Pg 34 – 38 of French Impermanence: Its Origins and Beginnings



    “On the 2nd of June, 1923, the Ottoman government announced that itss gendarmerie had raided a depot in Salonika Harbor, where 38 American smugglers were captured with illegal prostitutes, and exotic luxuries that were illegal smuggled by the group. Amidst this group of American smugglers was none other than the infamous Enoch Lewis ‘Nucky’ Johnson. Johnson was a New Jersey citizen, and he was infamous within Atlantic City, New Jersey. His rise to power started in 1909 when he became the Atlantic County Republican Executive Secretary. He was quick to start corrupt deals and was routinely viewed with cases such as nepotism and corruption being charged at him. In 1911, he was nearly imprisoned, however, Johnson managed to slip between the authority’s fingers by using his political connections. However, at the same time, the small ring of corrupt bureaucrats that Johnson was a part of was leaderless when Louis Kuehnle was arrested, and Johnson took advantage of the absent leadership to become the ring’s leader. Johnson quickly took advantage of the touristic value of Atlantic City, supplying customers with Prostitutes, gambling, drink, and luxurious debauchery. During the same time, he continued to remain a powerful member of New Jersey’s Republican Party, and during the 1916 and 1920 Presidential Elections, he was instrumental in the local campaigns. As a result, he cultivated several political ties that granted him and his ring near immunity from the police and authorities.

    1630500646220.png

    Enoch Johnson in 1940

    Johnson reached his zenith when in 1918, under the Republican government, a policy of soft prohibition was adopted by the government. Though the soft nature of the prohibition system stunted any larger exploitations, Johnson was still able to use his considerable criminal experience to bootleg, smuggle, and distribute illegal alcohol to customers in addition to the normal goods he provided his customers. Johnson was also instrumental in making Atlantic City a virtual gambler’s dream, with Johnson owned gambling houses and casinos in every crook and cranny of the city. In early 1923 however Johnson received an opportunity that had the capability of filling his pockets with even more money. Middle Eastern goods had long been seen as ‘exotic’ in the United States of America, and as such, the elite of America sought after them repeatedly. With the aid of an Albanian immigrant within his ring, Johnson came into contact with a ring of Ottoman smugglers in Salonika. These smugglers promised Johnson with extra prostitutes from the middle east, and smuggled goods such as Ottoman Diamonds and Ottoman Tobacco for extremely lowered costs than normal. This was a golden opportunity for Johnson. [4]

    Accepting another offer to negotiate directly with the Ottoman smugglers, led by an infamous Arab smuggler Mehmed Al-Badawi in Salonika, Johnson left Atlantic City for what he deemed to be a temporary journey to the Ottoman Empire. When he arrived in Salonika with a small group of his trusted subordinates, he began to send more and more smuggled goods from the Ottoman Empire back to Atlantic City. For a month, the man managed to dodge suspicious Ottoman police and gendarmerie officers, however he was finally caught in the early days of June when a governmental spy within the Al-Badawi ring managed to bring the gendarmerie to Johnson’s depot. The Ottoman gendarmerie hauled Johnson and his subordinates into a waiting cell within Salonika Gendarmerie Headquarters and this sparked off what became known as the Johnson Incident.


    1630500691540.png

    Senator Walter Edge

    Johnson had two powerful political allies, Senator Walter Edge from New Jersey and Frank Hague, the Mayor of Jersey City. Both of these political figures had powerful economic ties with the smuggling rings that Johnson operated, and as a result, both of them raised massive complaints regarding the issue within the American government. While suspicion regarding Johnson’s legality of business remained, without a proper criminal record against him, for the American government this was an innocent American staying in Ottoman prisons. Previous actions such as the Johnson Incident had taken place before, which had strained Ottoman-American relations, however none of those previous smugglers had such powerful allies like the ones Johnson had. This precipitated a small diplomatic crisis when the American government sent a dispatch to the Ottoman Embassy asking that Johnson be deported back to the United States. The Ottoman Ambassador in the USA, Mohammad Ali Bey Al-Abed was told by Constantinople to tell the American government that as Johnson was caught on Ottoman soil, smuggling Ottoman goods and humans (in particular human trafficking was punishable by death in the Ottoman Empire), the Ottomans would not be returning the man and that he would face the full extent of Ottoman Law.

    This was not an option for the American government. Though the American government had little love for Johnson, they could not be seen condemning an ‘innocent’ American into foreign imprisonment. The Democrats and Progressives would impeach Hughes if such an event came to pass. The American government offered to create a joint Ottoman-American tribunal against the ring and judge them through a combination of American and Ottoman Law. Whilst to most of the European world this was a sensible compromise, for the Ottoman Empire, it was an affront. Ottoman Law had ruled supreme in the Empire for 600 years without question and without foreign intervention, and trying to intervene in the Ottoman Law was unconsciously on part of America, an insult to Sultan Osman I, who had formulated Ottoman Law. And an insult of Sultan Osman I meant that his direct descendant, Sultan Abdulmejid II was indirectly insulted. That simply deepened the diplomatic spat between Washington and Constantinople as the Ottoman government rejected the idea resolutely. On the 24th of June, Johnson was tried in Ottoman court in Adrianople and was found guilty of human trafficking, illegal smuggling, and illegal procuration of goods. The Ottomans not willing to escalate the matter, did not sentence Johnson to death (which was customary for human trafficking), and instead sentenced the man to life imprisonment. A small concession was allowed when the Ottoman court decreed that visiting family members would have their expenses covered by the ottoman government.


    1630500759281.png

    A Sketch of Johnson's Trial.

    This still outraged the American public however. Though the government had a good idea of Johnson’s illegal activities and had only protested as a formality, to the public Johnson was a beloved businessman and public figure. Attacks against the Ottoman Empire through speeches took place, and anti-Ottoman Senators and Congressmen in the US Congress began to level heavy criticisms to the Ottoman Empire. In retaliation the Ottoman Government suspended the Ottoman-American Company’s public branch in the USA. This was a heavy attack, as the Ottoman-American Company had been running since 1819 and the temporary suspension of the public branch was a visible attack. Some bellicose and belligerent congressmen even began entertaining far-right anti-islamic positions on the Ottoman Empire fueled by Christian fundamentalism. This was somewhat curtailed by the fact that every American politician knew that the Ottomans were allied with the British Empire, and though London had adopted a neutral stance (until a war broke out), no American, knowing of the economic influence of Britain in America, had any intention of actually creating conflict with the Ottomans. After a few weeks, the Johnson Incident died down in the public mind and the American government allowed itself to forget the issue as well. However, the Johnson Incident would simply a small incident in a history of bad relations between Washington and Constantinople.

    As for Johnson, the man was released in 1949 by the Ottoman government and deported back to the USA after the Second Great War. Johnson who would never gain the same amount of monetary resources that he had before his imprisonment died in 1965 in relative poverty, his gang of criminals and smugglers having died a quiet and strangling death without their capable leader.” – Pg 176 – 180 of American Gangsters in Europe: The Unseen Crime Syndicate of America




    Footnotes:-

    [1] – The Ottomans remember, are an empire. To further their own interests, they will not blink in supporting dictatorships.

    [2] – True fact

    [3] – OTL numbers slightly heightened due to better british economy ittl

    [4] – Johnson was given such an offer from Albania otl as well, but he didn’t accept due to the unstable nature of interwar Albania. With a stable Ottoman Empire, that situation changes a lot ittl.


    A/N: All images other than wikibox are from public google images source. All rights reserved.
    ***
     
    notice
  • Alright, sorry guys, but i have to go back to Nepal right now, due to festival season arriving. As a result, until September 26, i will not be uploading a chapter. Sorry for the inconvenience guys!
     
    The Overlooked Minorities of the Ottoman Empire c. 1923
  • The Overlooked Minorities of the Ottoman Empire c. 1923
    The Ottoman Empire at the beginning of 1923 was (still is) a multi-ethnic nation, filled to the brim with many ethnic groups, of varying languages, and varying religious identities as well as a lot of linguistic variations. While the main ethnicities of the Empire - Turkish, Arab, Greek, Armenian, Slavs, Albanians, Pontic Greeks, Assyrians - get all the attention, this small study will shed light on the situation of these small and peculiar minorities of the Ottoman Empire.

    1. The Old Italians

    Numbering only 7,861 according to the 1922 Ottoman Census, the Old Italians are Ottoman citizens who trace their heritage not to the Kingdom of Italy, but to the Venetian Republic, Bourbon Kingdom of Sicily, and the Republic of Genoa. These maritime and trading powers at their height controlled the Mediterannean as its naval masters. And as a result, many traders settled throughout the Middle East to further their mercantile and trading apparatus. The Old Italians are the descendants of these traders and merchants who settled within the borders of the Ottoman Empire. Most of these people still follow the Catholic Church and profess Catholic Christian ideals. Unfortunately, the centuries have diluted the linguistic varieties that these people may have once had, and only small isolated communities of Old Italians in Saruhan speak the old Italian tongues (mainly Genoese and Venetian) anymore. Most of the population today speaks Turkish and Arab as their first languages, for their ancestors shed their linguistic identity generations ago. Yet despite that sad fact, the 1922 Ottoman Language Committee created on the initiation of Sultan Abdulmejid II is trying to compile the old Italian dialects and standardize them, to preserve the language at all costs. Despite the dire situation of their language, their culture however, remained exquisitely alive, with Old Italian Quarters in Saruhan, Tripoli, and Benghazi feeling more like the artistic rendition of the Venetian and Genoese Glory days rather than 20th century Ottoman Empire. A small community, but they will continue to endure.

    1631426681076.png

    A painting from the 1400s depicting the Italian Quarter in Smyrna

    2. Dom People

    1631426753561.png

    Dom women in the 1890s

    The distant cousins of the Roma People, the Doma people, like the Roma left the Indian Subcontinent and migrated to the Middle East. Unlike the Roma who spread into Europe, the Dom stayed in the Middle East. Unlike the Roma again, sadly the Dom has not been nearly as successful in maintaining their culture. Years of soft assimilation led to most Dom people identifying as either Arab or Kurdish in national censuses. Nonetheless, with a population of around 20,000 people, this small community, mostly concentrated around Eastern Anatolia and Northern Mesopotamia, is very unique compared to other minorities of the Empire. Domari, the language that these people pre-dominantly speak, is not a standardized language, and most villages have different writing systems, making writing impossible to interpret between two Dom of different villages. As a result of this long differing history, the Dom people have a unique oral tradition, passing down their tradition, culture (most famous is their singing and dancing techniques) through the oral method alone. The Dom people, though small in numbers, were the most fervent supporters of the 1908 Revolution in the Ottoman Empire, despite the rural and arch-reactionary nature of rural eastern Anatolia. As a result, Dom people have found success in recent years. Nary a dancing theatre in Constantinople is complete without a Dom master dancer, and the Dom culture, long oppressed under Abdulhamid II, neglected under Abdulaziz and Abdulmejid I, is undergoing a masterful renaissance within the Ottoman Empire.

    3. The Turkmen

    1631427003350.png

    Flag of the Turkmen of the Empire

    Though Turkic in ethnic origins, calling a Turkmen a Turkish person is considered a grave insult, so do be careful! Though the Turkmen are listed as either Turkish, Kurdish, or Arab in Censuses throughout the Empire, make no mistake, these peoples are very unique in their heritage and culture. In a way, these people are the heirs of the Seljuk Turks, having first settled in the Mesopotamian Basin under the rule of Abu Ja'far ibn Ahmad al-Qadir and Tugrul Bey in the 1060s. Though a Turk, Azeri or any Turkic person would be able to understand the Turkmen's language (with varying levels of difficulty), the Turkmen Language is unique in the fact that it is a perfect mixture of Iranic and Arabic dialects mashed into a Western Oghuz Turkic dialect. Their culture also puts heavy emphasis on horse riding, and fathers take their sons to learn the art of horse riding from the moment their children are capable of riding a horse. As a result, the Turkmen provide the cream of the Ottoman Cavalry and have done so for centuries on the end. And though the era of cavalry is coming to a rapid end due to modern warfare, the Turkmen's horse riding culture continues to endure, as they now work in connecting isolated villages in the desert with the metropolitan part of the Empire, providing an invaluable aid to the development process of the Empire. With Mosul as their main home, they remain a powerful, but often overlooked minority within the Ottoman Empire.

    4. The Ajam Iranians

    1631427212574.png

    The banner of the Ikhanate was adopted by the Ajamics in 1876 as their ethnic flag

    Numbering between 100,000 to 400,000 people depending on which census or which data you refer to, the Ajamics are the Persians of Mesopotamia. Once the rulers of Mesopotamia in ancient Antiquity, led under the glorious Achaemenid, Parthian, and Sassanid Empires, ever since the Arab conquest, the Persians increasingly became a minority. Thoroughly Islamicized by the time the Ottomans conquered Mesopotamia in 1638, this ethnic group retained its cultural, traditional, and linguistic diversity and uniqueness. More uniquely, the language spoken by the Ajam Iranians is a direct continuum of Early Modern Persian (dating back to the 7th century) and more interestingly, has more loanwords, and more conjugation from Middle Persian (the language of the Sassanids) than the standardized Persian spoken in Iran. This has led to some tensions between Iranian Nationalist and Ajamic Cultural Groups, as both consider themselves the (Islamic) heir of the Sassanid Empire. Linguistically, it is undoubtedly true that the Ajamics share more in common with the Sassanids, though the Iranians are also undoubtedly the direct national state continuation of the Sassanids. The Ajamics in Ottoman history has shared a unique history. A Georgian observer in the 1640s observed during one of the Ottoman campaigns in the Caucasus that the Ottoman Engineers were almost entirely filled to the brim with 'Mesopotamian Persians', which is the old denotation of the Ajamics. Their unique language, suppressed by local Arabic bands and militias remained unstandardized, but under the 1923 Language Law, a new standardization scheme is underway under the auspices of the Ottoman Empire.

    5. The Cappadocian Greeks

    1631427789330.png

    A Cappadocian Wedding in 1902, Kayseri

    The Cappadocian Greeks trace their history several millennia back, and like the Pontic Greeks share a unique heritage of their own that differentiates them from normal Ottoman Greeks. Numbering somewhere around ~200,000, the Cappadocian Greeks are the heirs of Alexander the Great within Southern Anatolia. The language that Cappadocians speak, whilst somewhat intelligible with Modern Greek, is considered to be a direct continuation of Byzantine Greek with Turkish characteristics involved. Unlike most of the other Greek language systems, the Cappadocian sound system includes the Turkish vowels ı, ö, ü, and the Turkish consonants b, d, g, š, ž, , (although some of these are also found in Greek words as a result of palatalization). [1] Though linguistic isolation from the rest of the Greek linguistic sphere has led to several other dialects of Cappadocian arising. In 1913, under the direction of Grand Vizier Ali Kemal, Cappadocian Greek was compiled, and standardized, with the aid of Greek linguistic experts from the Kingdom of Greece, and ever since 1915, the standardized version of Cappadocian Greek is taught in Cappadocian schools. Culturally, their greatest heritage is that the Cappadocians have kept ancient Anatolian cuisine culture alive, as the ancient Anatolian dishes, usually consisting of mixtures of Spanakopita, Madimak and Pastirma mashed together, was preserved by the Cappacodians. Perhaps the most famous Cappadocian Greek in the Ottoman Empire c. 1923 would be none other than Leonidas Kestekides. Becoming world-famous in 1910 during the 1910 Belgian Fair for his unique recipes of Chocolate, he returned to the Ottoman Empire in 1913 after an invitation from Konstaniyye Confectionaries became too good for him to pass up. In 1915, during the Balkan War, Kestekides set up the Leonidas Confectionaries, which produced chocolate and other confectionaries to be distributed to the troops at the front to keep their morale high. As a result, among the other parts of the Empire, sweet chocolate has become a stereotype for Cappadocian Greeks within the Ottoman Empire.



    6. The Crimean Tatars

    1631428805558.png

    The Famous Insignia of the Giray dynasty, which became the symbol of Crimean Tatars

    Formed out of the ethnogenesis of Scythians, Alans, Sarmatians, Central Asians, Kipchaks, Cumans, Khazars, Goths, Pechenegs, and Old Bulgars, the Crimean Tatars were once the rulers of Crimea, Kuban, and the Sea of Azov. The Giray Dynasty also led the Crimean Tatars to their greatest cultural, military, and linguistic height. However ever since Crimea was annexed in the late 1700s by Russia under the rule of Catherine of the Great, the Tatars are an ever-diminishing minority within their ancestral homeland. More importantly, when in 1783 Crimea was annexed, the nobility of the Tatars fled to the Ottoman Empire, followed by their old feudal levies and families, creating a visible minority within the Ottoman Empire. This migration of nobles was followed by a steady flow of Crimean Tatar Nationalists fleeing Russification into the Ottoman Empire. While around ~2.5 million people in the empire share Crimean Tatar ancestry, only ~60,000 actually identify as Tatar according to the 1922 Census, however. Nevertheless, unlike the other diminished minorities of the empire, Crimean Tatars remained extremely politically active in the Empire. The Deputy Speaker of the Ottoman Senate, Ahmed Tevfik Pasha is a Crimean Tatar by birth, having been born to a Crimean Tatar father who was descended from the Girays. 4 Deputies in the Chamber of Deputies profess Crimean Tatar origins, and the Ottoman Empire, against Russification of Crimea, remains as a bastion of the Crimean language. Exiled Crimean Tatar Nationalists mostly flee to the Ottoman Empire bolstering the Crimean Tatar Community within the Empire.

    7. The Circassians

    1631431002020.png

    The Circassian Banner

    The Circassian Genocide was perhaps one of the largest genocides committed by the Russian Empire. After the Genocide, only ~100,000 Circassians were left in Russia, when just before the genocide, their numbers totaled 1.6 million. Many were killed, many children were forcefully taken from their parents and raised as Slavs, never knowing their Circassian heritage. Many more fled Russia. Most of the Circassians fled to the Ottoman Empire. With more than a million people in the empire sharing Circassian Ancestry, and with ~120,000 - ~500,000 identifying as Circassian, the Ottoman Empire is literally speaking, the last haven of the Circassians. The Adyghe populace of Circassians assimilated easily into the Empire, though they retained their identities. Circassians were elevated to high positions in the Ottoman Empire. One of the Empire's most successful Grand Viziers under Tanzimat, Koca Husrev Mehmed Pasha was a Circassian by birth, and many instrumental leaders in the Empire, such as Ahmed Niyazi Bey (leader of the 1908) revolution have Circassian origins. The Circassian language, much-maligned in Russia, is openly taught within special Ottoman schools for the Circassian populace of the Empire, and the 1922 Ethnic and Linguistic Laws that was implemented by the LU after their victory in the 1922 Ottoman General Elections, has led to a cultural renaissance of Circassians within the Ottoman Empire.

    1631432791177.png

    Migration of Circassians into the Ottoman Empire


    8. The Megleno-Romanians

    1631432278504.png

    Megleno-Romanian Regions in the Ottoman Balkans in Green

    Descended from an ethnic mixture of the now-extinct Pechenegs and Greeks, the Megleno-Romanians are a unique people. Boasting a population of around 40,000 to 50,000 people, the Vlachs, as the Megleno-Romanians have come to be known as, are a small yet consequential minority in the Ottoman Empire. Their language, though similar to Romanian, shows a complete lack of Slavic influence, and shows a majority Greek and Turkish influence in their Romance language. Though in the 1400s, the Vlachs became enemies of the Empire, by the 1600s they became loyal subjects, and the Empire rewarded the Vlachs with a special autonomous system called the 'Captain' System through which every Vlach village was granted a Captain chosen by the elders of the village. The Captain would thus act like a Mayor looking after the village. This system worked fine for the Vlachs but in 1877, this autonomy was abolished, and instead, the Vlachs were recognized as a formal minority of the Empire. The Vlachs are also disproportionately working in the military, becoming famed administrators within the Ottoman Army. Around 46% of all young Vlach abled-bodied men work in the military according to the 1922 census, which shows their powerful sense of military tradition. Despite their ethnic identity and awareness, however, Vlachs like to live in isolation, living in small isolated villages scattered throughout Ottoman Thessaly, Macedonia, and Albania. Most Vlachs send their children to learn in Salonika, Tirana, Skopje, or Yanya, where education in Vlach is provided for this unique minority of the empire.

    Footnotes:
    [1] -Taken
    From Wiki
     
    Looking into the Future [3]
  • 1944, Athens, Kingdom of Greece

    Alexandros Papagos muttered curses underneath his breath as he looked at the map of the trenches outside of the city of Athens again. The Germans and Hungarians were pushing deep into the final lines and if the last lines fell, then despite the turn of war, Athens would fall, which would be devastating to the cause of war for the Allied Powers. He stumbled down onto his chair rubbing his eyes, not knowing what to tell the King and Prime Minister in his daily report. He picked up the pen and a sheet of paper before sighing and stowing them away again. He was about to stand up and take a glass of much-needed wine when a message courier stumbled into the office.

    Papagos simply raised an eyebrow in question. Instances such as these had happened too many times during the siege for him to be angry about it anymore.

    "General." The courier gasped. "The Ottomans.......The Ottoman 5th Army has arrived in Avlona sir. They have defeated, with British air support, a German counterattack. The Germans are now surrounded on the Attican Peninsula."

    The dread of defeat was immediately replaced by the vigor of victory. Papagos stood up immediately and dismissed the courier and started his report quickly. Who knew that 500 years after the Ottomans came to Athens to conquer it, they were once again coming to Athens.......only this time to liberate it.

    1943, South China Sea

    Chen Shaokuan, Captain of the
    Qianlong Cruiser didn't know what to expect. The British had warned him that after years of deflecting the issue, the government in Constantinople had finally agreed to send a small detachment of ships from the Red Sea Fleet and Persian Gulf Fleet to aid the Sino-British Naval force against the impending Japanese Naval attack. Commanding the 3rd Cruiser Squadron, Chen was anxious to finally destroy Japanese Naval Superiority in the South China Sea, and to finally isolate the Japanese troops in Indochina as a result. The War in Manchuria was going badly and the Chinese government needed this reprieve now more than ever.

    As the morning mist dissipated, he could see the Ottoman squadrons - two squadrons had been sent apparently - arrive next to his own squadron. Whilst most of the ships were medium and small in scale, destroyers and light cruisers, an imposing battlecruiser, the only battleship the Ottomans had sent apparently, led the Ottoman Squadrons, and flew the banner of the Ottoman Kapudan Pasha, signifying its role as flagship. Chen had heard about this particular battlecruiser. Built by Franco-British contractors in Constantinople in 1935, and only commissioned in late 1940. The
    Hayreddin Barbarossa. This ship and its class were apparently the answer of the Ottomans against the Italian Augustus Class. It's large guns and armor gleamed in the morning sun as the Sino-Ottoman squadrons neared each other.

    Chen finally stood up and straightened to enter the allied ship for battle planning. The small amount of ships sent by Constantinople - damn the politicians and bureaucrats for that! - meant that the Ottoman ships would not be able to play a large role in the Battle that was to come; but they would still be crucial, Chen knew that for sure.

    January, 1944, Occupied Albania

    For Ahmet Muhtar Zogoli, time flew by in the small camp of his militia like an immediate blink. The daily routine was the same. Wake up, eat breakfast, go and disrupt Concordat supply lines, and then retreat, come back to camp, eat dinner, and sleep. It had been three years already, Zogoli mused. But for now, he had another important mission to conduct; that of weapon's procurement.

    The government in Constantinople had enforced strict gun regulations after the troubles in Yemen in the late 1920s and early 1930s, and as a result, finding actual guns in the Ottoman Empire not commissioned by the government, occupied or not, was a tiresome job. But for now, the Ottomans, supported by British and French airpower were ferrying much-needed weapons to guerilla leaders like him through transport ships. He gripped the pistol in his right hand whilst following the map in his left hand. One eye of his focused on the map and another on his surroundings. After a few minutes of tense walking, he saw a few crates scattered in a small clearing inside the dense Albanian forests of Peshk. He allowed himself to grin slightly and whistled. A few seconds later, his men appeared behind him, and soon the crates were being transported to his camp.

    As Zogoli turned to leave, his mission completed, he saw the air trail of planes in the sky. In the distance, a blurry form of Ottoman and British transport ships flew away. Zogoli smiled and saluted the disappearing planes before disappearing into the woods as well.
     
    Top