How's the Start?


  • Total voters
    450
Hello,

If the Empire is to address the welfare of its citizens according to its new liberal government, would there be a need to examine the current taxation and spending laws? Regarding national education reform, would the corruption problem be best addressed with a government body that can investigate and prosecute such cases? Finally, with prison system reform, would the long term goals include acting against cruel and unusual punishment, giving prisoners the chance to re-enter society through rehabilitation, and prisoner work programs?

What ever the case, the government needs to ask itself similar questions and provide creative but realistic solutions owing to available revenues, public attitudes and input, and other public sectors competing for funds and legislation.
 
If the Empire is to address the welfare of its citizens according to its new liberal government, would there be a need to examine the current taxation and spending laws?
yes, partially at least for transparency
Regarding national education reform, would the corruption problem be best addressed with a government body that can investigate and prosecute such cases?
Yes that would be best, and will be in the making soon enough.
Finally, with prison system reform, would the long term goals include acting against cruel and unusual punishment, giving prisoners the chance to re-enter society through rehabilitation, and prisoner work programs?
For non-serious offenders, yes that is the end goal.
What ever the case, the government needs to ask itself similar questions and provide creative but realistic solutions owing to available revenues, public attitudes and input, and other public sectors competing for funds and legislation.
Indeed it will
 
any predictions?

Well, Russians did something stupid. Chinese quagmire is and will remain a quagmire, and stepping into that will not do anyone favors.

Japanese barely avoided doing something stupid, but it seems they are barreling straight towards doing something stupid. The usual suspects might not have as much power as they did OTL, but since they are dumb, violent fucks, that is never a guarantee. Still, what I said wrt Russia applies - you are not taking down a country ten times your size, sunshine. Civil war or no civil war.

Greeks seem to be inclined towards doing something stupid. Especially considering that this is not the OTL Empire, Megali Idea is pretty much "Bad Idea". Nationalists are mind-numbingly stupid at best of times, and scratching at something like Megali Idea is probably the dumbest thing Greece can do at this point. This is no longer the Sick Man of Europe.
 
Well, Russians did something stupid. Chinese quagmire is and will remain a quagmire, and stepping into that will not do anyone favors.
indeed
Japanese barely avoided doing something stupid, but it seems they are barreling straight towards doing something stupid. The usual suspects might not have as much power as they did OTL, but since they are dumb, violent fucks, that is never a guarantee. Still, what I said wrt Russia applies - you are not taking down a country ten times your size, sunshine. Civil war or no civil war.
Well, the Japanese are going to be veering towards conflict so yeah
Greeks seem to be inclined towards doing something stupid. Especially considering that this is not the OTL Empire, Megali Idea is pretty much "Bad Idea". Nationalists are mind-numbingly stupid at best of times, and scratching at something like Megali Idea is probably the dumbest thing Greece can do at this point. This is no longer the Sick Man of Europe.
The UO doesn't really want a megali idea. They're just using the nationalism to gain more votes really
 
Greek republicanism was directly connected to the national schism. No schism as in here no republicanism. Papanastasiou running to the left of Venizelos is likely but when all is said and done he'd always side with Venizelos over the likes of Gounaris.

The three potential bigwigs of the opposition would be Gounaris, Stratos and Dragoumis. Stratos may or may not have crossed to the opposition without the Salamis affair, Dragoumis will even if pursuing a foreign policy mostly similar to Venizelos TTL.

Cyprus... certainly got representation in parliament at the time it united with Greece even if some legal fiction had to be created to bring the Cypriot MPs into parliament. "No sir he is not the MP for Famagusta. He's the MP for Salamis second electoral district. Yes of course 50,000 Salamis natives are living in Famagusta. Big community since the time of Teukros don't you know ?"
 
Greek republicanism was directly connected to the national schism. No schism as in here no republicanism. Papanastasiou running to the left of Venizelos is likely but when all is said and done he'd always side with Venizelos over the likes of Gounaris.
from what i have read on the liberal party, republicanism, whilst not popular or present in a large amount, was definitely visible and present before the National Schism, at least within the Liberals
The three potential bigwigs of the opposition would be Gounaris, Stratos and Dragoumis. Stratos may or may not have crossed to the opposition without the Salamis affair, Dragoumis will even if pursuing a foreign policy mostly similar to Venizelos TTL.
Pretty much yes. Gaonaris is the strongest anti-Venezelist here, and probably the most politically powerful.
Cyprus... certainly got representation in parliament at the time it united with Greece even if some legal fiction had to be created to bring the Cypriot MPs into parliament. "No sir he is not the MP for Famagusta. He's the MP for Salamis second electoral district. Yes of course 50,000 Salamis natives are living in Famagusta. Big community since the time of Teukros don't you know ?"
That's the major issue here. Cyprus is a protectorate in control of Greece, not directly a part of Greece. The protectorate needs to end for the island to be directly integrated into the Kingdom, which is why the new round table talks are now opening.
Though like you said, many Cypriots will be elected to the parliament through less than stellar measures.
 
Any chance the ottomans will retain any level of influence in Cyprus goin forward? Maybe ensure protections to the Turkic or Muslim Cypriots currently living on the island and call it a day?
 
What is the status of capital punishment in the Ottoman Empire at the moment, and what method(s) of execution does the state employ? If I were to guess, hanging is used for civil crimes, and firing squad for military offences.
 
Chapter 52: German troubles
Osman Reborn

Chapter 52: German troubles

***

“After six years-worth of economic crisis, the German economy finally reached its inevitable end – collapse. On the 2nd of January, 1923, after years of failing to stabilize the German economy, French and Russian disinterest in stabilizing the central European economy, the German economy collapsed completely. A loaf of bread cost more than trillions of Marks, and the German Mark was completely useless as a currency. Already, the local regions began to stop using their Marks, and issued local currencies, weighted for in local resources. The situation was exceedingly horrible for the normal German person, as they had to resort to a barter system much of the time to get what they needed. The economic crisis also led to the full collapse of the German government. Rosa Luxemburg resigned as Chancellor of Germany and the government went into crisis as the entire cabinet also resigned from the government, after their repeated failures to improve the situation. The governmental crisis was perhaps, only saved by the fact that President Gustav Noske refused to resign, and activated article 9 of the German constitution, allowing him to take emergency powers within the German government.


1629095327013.png

President Gustav Noske of Germany

Despite this economic and political crisis at hand however, the German government was still being forced to pay their war reparations to France and Russia. The worthless German economy made it impossible for Germany to exchange their currency into foreign tender to pay the reparations. The German government, as such, failed to pay the reparations it owed to Russia and France on the 1st of January, 1923. This sparked the Reparations Controversy, as many German politicians wanted to use the economic crisis to end the reparations entirely. Prime Minister Rene Viviani of France was adamant that Germany would have to pay war reparations, or the continued French economic investment in Wurttemburg and the Rhineland would be forfeit. Considering that these French investments were the only substance providing stability to the local economies of the region, losing said investment would have disastrous consequences for the Germans. These French investments also saw food kitchens being made for the economically destitute people in Germany (who were made destitute because of the Great Dive), allowing them to receive proper food and nutrition that was unavailable to them from Berlin. Many in the French government wanted to use the opportunity to occupy the Rhineland, and take all of the industrial produce of the region to make up for the reparations. Whilst Viviani was ardently in support of continuing the reparations, he was, however not in favor of a military solution. He knew very well that the British would not support a military situation and that they supported the German position that the reparations were too high. Whilst Russia would be on board for an occupation, if only to receive the money that it was using to pay for their massive infrastructural uplift schemes. In the French Chamber of Deputies, this position taken by the ruling government came into heavy question, as all of the rightwing parties united in their opposition against Viviani’s decision not to use military force against the German crisis.

Russia on the other hand, had no qualms about an occupation. The German reparations to Russia was almost as large as their reparations to France. The huge amount of rubles flowing into Russia from Germany was being used by the Russians to build more infrastructure, canals, and commercial services within the Empire. Without said rubles, then their economic and monetary viability would come into question. Despite the misgivings of Russian Prime Minister Sergey Muromstyev, Tsar Nicholas II, no longer constrained by the fact that he didn’t have a cousin ruling Germany, ordered the Russian Army to occupy East Prussia all the way upto the Oder River. On the 16th of January, 1923, the Russians entered Eastern Prussia, with absolutely no military resistance, as Noske had reluctantly ordered the 200,000-man strong German army to let the Russians enter without a fight. Noske didn’t really want to fight the Russians, knowing very well that if the Russians wanted they could occupy all of the country. It was however, a heavy hit to his prestige as President of Germany. Rudolf Heinze, for example, decried this action, and publically called upon countries like Britain and the neutral powers like Sweden, Ottomans and Austrians to intervene in the current controversy. The British were unhappy with the occupation for one good reason – the Russians had done it. This blatant occupation could only have taken place if the Russians were sure that they would not face proper repercussions from anyone. They also did it, in the view of the British, to project power, showing the world that Russian troops were in the heart of Germany, and as such, Central Europe. The British, and upon British pressuring, the Ottomans protested against the occupation diplomatically asking the Russians to withdraw.


belgian occupation zone.PNG

The Belgian occupation of the German Rhine 1923-24.

Belgium’s response to the crisis, however, soured any sort of action that London could take. Prime Minister George Theunis was a moderate right-wing politician in Belgium, however, the crisis that was enveloping Central Europe meant that Belgium had the opportunity to gain more economic leverage than what was thought possible. Goaded on by Minister of Finance, Aloys Van de Vyvere, and Minister of Defense, Albert Deveze, one week after the Russians occupied German East Prussia, 80,000 Belgian troops entered the German Rhineland, and occupied the region from Aachen to Trier, joining Russia in an economic occupation of the Germans. This was the final nail in the coffin, and Noske declared that after a new government was formed, he would resign, over failures of foreign policy. Rudolf Heinze, being the only man daring enough for the job in this desperate situation in Germany, accepted the offer to become Chancellor, and he formed a new government with his right-wing parties and alliances becoming the ruling government. Noske then resigned on the 7th of February and was replaced by Ernst Scholz as the President of the German Republic.

1629095507278.png

Polish troops of the Russian Army during the Occupation of Germany 1923-24

Heinze, for all his bluster, knew that he could do little to try and even stop the Russians and Belgians. He could, in theory, push the Belgians out of Germany, however that would invoke the wrath of London, who had taken a wait-and-see approach after the Belgians intervened. As such, he encouraged civil disobedience and passive resistance against the occupation and immediately started to look for economic solutions to the crisis, convening a national commission made up of Austrians, Germans, Bavarians, Danes, and British to find a proper solution. Heinze would go onto stabilizing the economy by the end of the year, however, the damage was done. The specter of Guildism now loomed over Germany.” The Rise of the Third German State © 1987



“The 1921 Census of Cyprus counted that 26% of the population were Turkish Cypriots whilst the remainder were in the vast majority Greeks, with small communities of Armenians, Maronites and Arabs sprinkled in between. The Turks as a result, made up the second largest ethnic group within Cyprus. The transfer of the Cypriot Protectorate from Britain to Greece re-affirmed their rights, and their religious situation, and allowed a small free movement area between Cyprus and the Ottoman Empire be established, allowing for Turkish Cypriots to return to the mainland if they wanted. The Cypriot Question, however, had become a boiling issue in Greek politics, and after the 1922 Greek Legislative Elections, the Greek government officially asked for negotiations with Constantinople regarding the issue. On February 6, 1923, the Greek delegation arrived in Constantinople to begin negotiations with the Ottoman Empire.

1629095579849.png

The Ottoman Delegations during the Constantinople Accords 1923.

Legally, the King of Greece, the Greek Head of State, was not the head of state of Cyprus, and the Ottoman Sultan remained the head of state of Cyprus. Abdulmejid II was of the opinion that if the rights of the Turkish Cypriots and Muslim community of the island had their rights guaranteed by the Greeks, then the island’s protectorate could easily be abolished. However, the Ottoman government knew that the issue was much more nuanced than simply guaranteeing the rights of the islanders and handing them over to the Greeks. Many Greek and Ottoman politicians were of the opinion that the Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots were incompatible with one another. The Greek Cypriots controlled the vast majority of the wealth of the island, and the Turkish Cypriots, the vast majority of whom were farmers, controlled the vast majority of the land as their owners. This contrast led to two opposing groups within Cyprus, the Greek and Turks to favor Enosis and Taksim respectively. Enosis was of course the ideology of uniting with Greece, whilst Taksim was an ideology of the Turkish Cypriots, asking for union with the Ottoman Empire, or partitioning the island between the Ottomans and Greeks based on ethnic lines. To their credit, neither Mustafa Kemal Pasha nor Venizelos believed that a partition or annexation that alienated the other ethnicities was a viable option to take. That said, there were pro-Ottoman Greeks in Cyprus, though they were overshadowed by the majority, who wanted union with Greece. The Ottomans had always been generally friendly to the Cypriots, re-establishing the dominance of the Greek Orthodox Church in Cyprus that had been robbed by the Venetians and by abolishing serfdom, whilst also slowly expelling the Latin elite from the island. These pro-Ottoman Greek Cypriots were however cherry picking historical facts. The Ottomans were both friendly and aggressive regarding Cyprus historically, with periodic prosperous and poor periods, both happening under the rule of the Ottomans.

The Ottoman government wished to make sure that the events in Crete were not repeated. Though the Cretan Turks were allowed full rights on paper, they were still extremely discriminated, and from 11% of the population, they had been reduced to a mere 5% of the population, with most immigrating to the Ottoman Empire and Egypt. The Ottoman government blamed that Greece, who had given her word to previous Grand Vizier, Ibrahim Hakki Pasha, had not abided by their part of the bargain. The Greek government, for their part, had in fact tried to enforce equality as agreed by the Treaty of Salonika, however whilst governments had a great degree of control, they could not control the minds of people. As nationalistic euphoria swept Crete after they reunited with Greece, ethnic minorities such as the Cretan Turks became natural targets for nationalistic chauvinism. Mustafa Kemal wanted assurances that such events would not take place in Cyprus. The Greek government, of course, could not give guarantees that such events would not take place, considering they could not control the people. Whilst Mustafa Kemal himself pushed a hardline stance during the negotiations, Ottoman Foreign Minister, Faisal Al-Hashemi, was much more moderate. He demanded that proper actions take place against instigators of such actions, and demanded that even with the Greeks annexing Cyprus, the Ottomans would have a say in Cypriot politics.


1629095629470.png

Ottoman Foreign Minister, Faisal Al-Hashemi

The last demand was of course, unacceptable to the Greeks, though they decided to be moderate, and the Greeks presented the Consulate Plan, wherein, the Ottoman government would be able to construct consulates in Cyprus, in the same manner as how the Greeks had consulates within almost every Greek majority Ottoman city. This plan was a grudgingly acceptable one for the Ottomans, as it meant that the Ottomans would still have a proper diplomatic presence on the island. After this was accepted by the Ottomans, very reluctantly, the Ottomans put forward their own negotiation agenda. Devolution of power. Devolution of power was something that the Ottomans intended to push through within the Cypriot sphere, so as to allow the Cypriot Turks to retain their political status within the island. Devolution is a system of providing sizeable federal like autonomous powers for provinces and districts of a de-jure unitary state like the Kingdom of Greece. Legislation created by the parliaments or sub-legislatures of the devolved states could be repealed or amended by the national legislature without constitutional dispute.

Many Greeks were opposed to this, despite Venizelos’s personal support for the idea. Venizelos personally believed that a local assembly or parliament for Cyprus would do wonders to heal the political divide between the several ethnicities of the island, and preserve stability in the region. However, on the 8th of February, after several renegotiations between the Ottoman and Greek delegations, most of the Greek diplomats accepted the issue of devolution most reluctantly. Finally, the final issue regarding Cyprus was that of economics. The Greek protectorate had preserved the British tariff rates and custom duties, however being directly integrated within the Greek state meant that Cyprus would be subject to Greek rates, which would make Ottoman investments in Cyprus slightly unsustainable, as the entirety of Ottoman investments in the region was based and structured on the previous tariff and custom rates. The Ottomans wanted the tariff and custom duties in Cyprus to remain the same, and to come under the authority of the devolved legislature. The Greeks, who knew they stood to lose economically if the Ottomans withdrew their investments from Cyprus, agreed to this issue handily. With all of these problems and nuances resolved on the 9th of February, 1923, the Accords of Constantinople 1923 was signed with the following points:-


  • Article 1 ended the protectorate of Cyprus formally and annexed it into the Kingdom of Greece.
  • Article 2 – 4 guaranteed the rights of the Turkish and Muslim Cypriot population, and their right of political, religious, and ethnic freedom.
  • Article 5 - 8 established the Parliament of Cyprus which was to be a unicameral devolved parliament of Cyprus, consisting of 120 seats, with 30 seats reserved for Turkish Cypriots, 10 seats reserved for other minorities of the island. The articles also specified the legislative powers, and limitations of the parliament.
  • Article 9 guaranteed that 25% of the seats in the Hellenic Parliament that would be given to Cyprus would be reserved for Turkish Cypriots.
  • Article 10 – 12 dealt with the economic issues of the transfer, and guaranteed that the same tariff and custom duties would remain in place within Cyprus for a time period of 10 years.
  • Article 13 – 15 guaranteed the right of the Ottoman government to open consulates in Cyprus to maintain their diplomatic presence on the island.
After the Accords were signed, the Ottoman Parliament, even the CUP, voted to ratify the Accords, being mostly satisfied with the several concessions wrangled from the Greeks. The Greek parliament, happy to see the issue of the Cypriots over, also ratified the Accords. Sultan Abdulmejid II formally and publically renounced his role as Suzerain of Cyprus on the 18th of February, 1923, and the Ottoman Flag which flew side by side the Greek flag in Nicosia was brought down after the Ottoman National Anthem was sung in Nicosia one last time in a ceremony of the transfer of power. As the new Cypriot legislature was formed, plans for the first elections in Cypriot history began to form. The first Cypriot General Elections would take place in the ending months of 1923, as the Cypriot Issue was tentatively considered over.

1629095718186.png

Insignia of the Devolved Cypriot Parliament.

Though many of the compromises reached were not liked by either the Greeks or the Ottomans, it spoke highly of the decade of good relations between Constantinople and Athens. Nationalists in both countries decried the concessions given to the other, however Greece and the Ottoman Empire were now firmly behind their antagonistic past. Though some tensions remained, the two countries after the Accords of Constantinople, for all intents and purposes de-facto allies, even though that state of affairs would only become de-jure during the Second Great War.” The Greco-Ottoman Rapprochement: Historic Antagonism vs Modern Alliance; A Case Study © 2017


“The 1920 Treaty of Seeb for all intents and purposes separated the Sultanate of Oman/Muscat from the Imamate of Oman completely, with British backing. However, in 1923, the economic situation changed the perception of the British regarding the Omani issue. The British had since 1921, allowed the Ottomans to enter Oman, who were looking for oil and natural gas in the region. In 1922, the Omani Sultan, Taimur bin Feisal allowed the Anglo-Ottoman Arabian Oil Company to have a monopoly over the Omani natural gas and oil prospects. The Ottomans and the British concluded that whilst prospective oil fields within Oman were highly likely, they would be too deep to drill them out for a good period of time. Oman’s natural gas, however was a different story. The border between the Imamate and the Sultanate consisted of various gas reserves that could be exploited immediately if the tribal conflict in the region was resolved.

Taimur saw an opportunity to unite the nation, and he took it. Preying upon the Ottoman and British disappointment that the gas fields were at the disputed and heavily contested border, he presented himself as an alternative and asked for aid in his endeavor to unite the nation. If, the British and Ottomans aided him, he told London and Constantinople, then the gas fields were all theirs, with of course, a percentage of the profit going to his coffers. The British and Ottomans pounced on this opportunity. The British provided the Sultan with the weapons, and the Ottomans provided the Sultan with proper generals and military officers. On March 23, 1923, with these advantages piled up for him, he invaded the Imamate of Oman.


1629095761403.png

Sultan Taimur bin Feisal

For their part, the Imamate of Oman was not blind to the danger it was soon finding itself in. The Imam, Muhammad ibn Abdullah Al Khalili knew the moment that gas fields were found in the border region that the Muscat Sultanate would prey upon it. He began to lobby internationally for weapons and training. He found covert aid in the form of the Republic of Inner Arabia and the Russian Empire. Moreso the former than the latter. The Russian Government itself didn’t sanction a proper intervention in the region, but their growing economic apparatus in the region meant that despite their neutrality on the issue, Russian weapons did find their way through into Imam hands. The Inner Arabians supported the Imamate heavily though. They sent supplies, weapons and even some volunteer battalions were transferred from Ha’il all the way into the Imamate after crossing hundreds of kilometers of treacherous deserts. Around 600 Arabian veterans were sent by the republic to aid the Imamate. Al-Khalili knew that even with the aid he was receiving, his forces would not be able to defeat the Muscat forces, supplied and supported as they were by the British and Ottoman government. He decided to swap strategy as result. When the Muscat forces crossed the border, his troops withdrew, and using the Al-Hajar Mountain Range to his advantage, began a massive guerilla campaign against the invading Muscat forces.

The Wars of Omani Unification thus began, over a gas dispute.” Unification of Oman: 1921 – 1943 © 2000



“As the five ear tenure of the 1918 parliament was coming to an end, all of the major political parties in the United Kingdom began their political campaigns in the country, hoping to gain the mandate of the House of Commons. The most glaring issue in the election was regarding the Russo-Belgian occupation of the German territories. The Labour Party and the Liberal Party were extremely agitated by the move, even more so than the ruling conservative minority government. Furthermore, Chamberlain, whilst a great diplomat, and a great administrator, Chamberlain’s government had glossed over domestic issues for meddling in the international arena. Furthermore, domestic pressure was starting to build up in the country regarding the issue of One Person, One Vote. Whilst the Representation of the People Act 1917 gave more than 8.4 million women the right to vote in the United Kingdom, becoming the final reform act regarding suffrage, it had failed to address the fact that 7% of the population still had plural voting rights, and the fact that many middle class men were allowed an extra vote due to the university constituencies. The growing political movement in the United Kingdom opposed this system of plural voting, wherein 10% to 15% of the population were allowed to vote more than once.

1629095969437.png

a one man one vote badge from the 1923 General Elections

Whilst the British economy was also doing pretty well, it was stagnating, as Chamberlain gave heavier emphasis on foreign policy and imperial policy rather than domestic economic policies. This allowed both the Liberals and Labour Parties to capitalize on this fact. The Liberals used Reginald McKenna, their leader’s economic prowess during the Great War to further their own propaganda during the general elections, and the Labour Party used several Democratic Socialist slogans to garner attention within the British Isles. Economically, the Conservatives were crippled during the campaign from the start. They had been funneling several foreign programs, such as the board and commission that oversaw the Anglo-Ottoman Alliance from their own pockets, and as such, the Labour and Liberal Parties were able to fund their political electoral campaign in a much better manner than the Conservatives and Liberal Unionists. Regarding policy as well, both the Liberals and Labour Parties attacked the Conservatives and Liberal Unionists for their inability to stop the Occupation of Germany. Many members believed that giving Belgium too much leeway would only backfire onto the British, and their agreement with the Russians, which all three of the main parties agreed was a major threat to British supremacy, was only going to embolden the Russians into provocation against the United Kingdom further. Thankfully for the Liberal Party, McKenna also knew that he could peddle the federalist angle that he had used in 1918. Federalism as an ideology was popular in Ireland, but extremely unpopular in Ulster, Wales, England and Scotland. He instead, promised further powers for local councils and boroughs to increase their administrative and economic efficiency.

Labour also made significant gains with the increasing industrialization of the country. Britain had started to increase their funding of industrial programs within Ireland, and even in northern Wales, and as a result, the increasing working class meant that the Labour Party stood to gain the most from the increasing industrial policies of the government during elections. Labour also managed to increase their presence in Ireland, as a result of the IPP becoming more inward looking. As the Irish Parliament Party held a very powerful majority over the Irish Commons, the party was more focused on local elections, and as a result, money left for campaigning for a general election was pitifully small. Furthermore, the party’s representative in the Westminster Government, Devlin had retired from official national level politics and had become involved in the Irish Home Rule Government. His successor, John Dillon was widely respected, but he didn’t hold the same charisma or electoral campaigning ability that his predecessor had. This meant that the Irish were looking increasingly more at the main 3 parties instead. As the Conservative Party had changed their position on Irish Home Rule, Irish folk, many of whom were conservative in their outlook, started to vote for the Conservatives again. Irish Liberals, mainly from the North and Central belt began to cast their votes in favor of McKenna and his liberal trading policy, which would benefit the commerce heavy regions of Central Ireland. Finally, the heavily industrialized Dublin, and Cork areas began to cast their votes in favor of Labour. The IPP continued to hold a monopoly over the majority of Irish votes, but it was clear to everyone that said monopoly was slowly coming to a close.


1629095848858.png

Edwin Scrymgeour, the powerful Scottish backer of the British Constitutionalists

The National Labour Party, which was meant to be a haven for leftists who had rightist tendencies and rightists who had leftist tendencies also splintered apart in 1920 after their leader George Barnes died of tuberculosis. The party fractured only rightist and leftist lines almost immediately after the death. Barnes had been the only one holding the party together, and with him gone, unity in the party was functionally at rock bottom. From the National Labour Party, two parties emerged. The British Constitutionalist Party and the Social Democratic Party led by Donald Howard and Christopher Addison respectively. The British Constitutionalist Party was fundamentally a center-right political party that found its basis on Christian Democracy and Prohibitionist tendencies. A moderately conservative party, it was founded on the economic principle of a social market economy. The party generally center and center-left economically, whilst also being an ardent unionist party within Scotland and Ireland. It founded itself as a moderately, but not overly so, skeptical party of birth control, and homosexuality. However, whilst the party was moderately socially conservative, only the main Conservative Party of the UK, the party also held a reconciliatory position regarding immigration, especially from the British Empire’s colonies. The party allied itself with two minor parties, the National Prohibition Party and the Scottish Prohibition Party and garnered the aid of Edwin Scrymgeour, a prominent Scottish prohibitionist politician. The party also gained the support of Axel Gustafson, a Swedish-American that was very involved in British politics at the time. The Social Democratic Party on the other hand, stood on the principle of being the fundamental social democratic party of the UK. They dismissed the claims that Labour was the Social Democratic Party, instead labelling it as Democratic Socialist. The ideological differences between Democratic Socialist and Social Democratic are subject to debate, but they did differ a lot in economic policy. The Social Democratic Party made an increase the social welfare of the country a key target. The Social Democratic party also attracted some socially conservative, economically left voters when they became one of the very first Social Democratic Parties in Europe to shed their association with Marxism. They publically endorsed the British Monarchy, calling George V the father of the nation, and endorsed the traditional British values as well. They generally endorsed social policy reform as their compromise between capitalism and socialism.

British General Elections wikibox 1923.png

When the election results finally came, the Liberals had won the most seats in Parliament, winning 259 seats, though still shy of a majority. The Conservatives lost 32 seats, whilst Labour made the most gains in parliament, winning 131 seats, making gains in Scotland, Wales and Ireland after their traditional English strongholds. The IPP decreased their mandate, losing 2 seats to Labour and 1 seat to the Liberals. The British Constitutionalist Party and the Social Democratic Party did surprisingly well for new parties that were formed after a split in a former party, winning 21 and 13 seats respectively. The Conservatives wanted to exploit the hung parliament, however this time Adamson and McKenna came to an agreement quickly, and formed a new coalition government. The new coalition government consisted of:-
Prime Minister and Leader of the House of Commons: Reginald McKenna (Lib)
Chancellor of the Exchequer: William Adamson (Lab)
Lord Chancellor and Leader of the House of Lords: Lord Haldane (Lib)
Foreign Secretary: Sir Edward Grey (Lib)
Secretary of State for the Colonies: The Marques of Crewe (Lib)
Lord Privy Seal and Deputy Leader of the House of Commons: Ramsay MacDonald (Lab)
Home Secretary: Herbert Samuel (Lib)
Secretary of State for War: Stephen Walsh (Lab)
Secretary of State for India: Graham White (Lib)
Secretary for Scotland: Harold Tennant (Lib)
Chief Secretary for Ireland: Thomas Johnson (Lab)
Secretary for Air: The Earl of Crawford (Lib)
First Lord of the Admiralty: Winston Churchill (Lib)
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster: Thomas McKinnon Wood (Lib)
President of the Board of Trade: Walter Runciman (Lib)
Minister of Agriculture: Arthur Henderson (Lab)
President of the Board of Education: Charles Philipps Trevelyan (Lab)
Postmaster General: Joseph Pease (Lib)
First Commissioner of the Works: Lewis Harcourt (Lib)
Minister of Labour: Margaert Bondfield (Lab)
Minister of Health: John Wheatley (Lab)

The new cabinet was most peculiarly formed with one woman within it, heralding the first female cabinet member in the United Kingdom. As the 1923 General Elections ended, the UK didn’t know it yet, but it was entering a new political era.” The Era of Progressive Conservatism © 1994

***
 
Well if the Russian is not careful, every one of their neighbour is potential enemy.

They already have antagonistic relationship with Britain & Ottoman empire, meddle in Chinese affair, Germany also will not forgive the occupation anytime soon, and Romania also love to get hands on Bessarabia if given chances.

Not to mention internal discontent....
 
Well if the Russian is not careful, every one of their neighbour is potential enemy.

They already have antagonistic relationship with Britain & Ottoman empire, meddle in Chinese affair, Germany also will not forgive the occupation anytime soon, and Romania also love to get hands on Bessarabia if given chances.

Not to mention internal discontent....

Russia is also on bad terms with Japan, opening an eastern front.
 
I'm not surprised about Russia occupying Germany but like the previous comment said, they are making more enemies then allies and I honestly want to know a bit more how Japan and the US are doing
 
Top