*clears throat in a dignified manner*As it seems like Poland will be a liberal democracy after all, yes, please do so.
YAY!
*clears throat in a dignified manner*As it seems like Poland will be a liberal democracy after all, yes, please do so.
No, a Socialist Japan is unlikely.
Perhaps a moderate socdem state? To do this, we could perhaps have the Emperor less under the influence of the far-right.What should we do in order to get Japan red? and what form of "going red" is likely in Japan?
Perhaps a moderate socdem state? To do this, we could perhaps have the Emperor less under the influence of the far-right.
Well, the list of German chancellors and parties etc. has been accepted as far as I know. Why do you think it is not canon yet, @KaiserEmu ? It did get threadmarked.
I didn’t make it canon- just wanted to show the different ideas that we have. The threadmark is to bring importance to the ideas.
As far as I can see, nobody has yet objected to the poll results. Of course one could have too many polls, that is correct, but I don't think more discussion is needed on Australia. We have incorporated most people into the decision, haven't we?
That was part of the polls, too. So not just an "assumed truth". A poll did come out with the result that the borders were liked by most voters.
Honestly, how strong do you want a consensus to be? Everyone in agreement?
And we will provide reasons. Of course we will provide reasons for a Red Japanosphere!
And never have I suggested that every single idea has to beused either?
No? We cooperate on this basis already, even if there was no formal decision. We could hold a poll of course, but otherwise?
Potential allies of Japan in the time period we were aiming for the revolution have either fallen to Romanism/Proactivism (Britain) or are likely isolationist (USA). I don't want to limit canon or anything, or limit the scope of this world, but I do think your standards on consensus as well as on how something can become canon are too high. We do think about more than the country, the region, when establishing something.
Perhaps a moderate socdem state? To do this, we could perhaps have the Emperor less under the influence of the far-right.
Although it does raise the question, which borders were being voted on? There have been a few different border proposals floating around.
The other option would be to have the Emperor more under the influence of the far-right, and more overtly supporting a war of aggression, which fails, and the Emperor is dethroned and a republic established, which becomes a moderate socdem state.
while Baltoslavia is torn apart for being implausible, when really it's just a combination of two almost-OTL proposals.
I'm just saying that from my point of view, a consensus hasn't yet been reached on this specific issue.
I like this idea.hat is the main point where we disagree. What do the others think? @Ferd42 , @mikroraptor , @Hindustani Person , @ETGalaxy , @YaaItsRewindTime , @Gabzcervo et al. - do yo uthink there is an established consensus about the division of Australia into a Libertarian-Democratic West Australia and a communist/syndicalist/far-left East Australia?
Both work.What about Japan being more aggressive in World War I, and then, in the interwar period, the Emperor is dethroned in a revolution which initially is democratic, but radicalises into a red one? Or the initial democracy, of a Weimar Republic type, is unstable and then Japan becomes communist?
Both work.
I believe that is correct. I am not wedded to the concept of a divided Australia, and I am fine with it being either divided or United.We voted on the borders on my last map as far as I know.
This makes a lot of sense, actually.What about Japan being more aggressive in World War I, and then, in the interwar period, the Emperor is dethroned in a revolution which initially is democratic, but radicalises into a red one? Or the initial democracy, of a Weimar Republic type, is unstable and then Japan becomes communist?
The reason I don't think Baltoslavia makes sense is the same reason that the Intermarium doesn't make sense to me in this scenario. It's antithetical to Germany and Russia's Imperial ambitions in the east.That was indeed something which I didn't understand, why Baltoslavia - the idea championed by @Augenis , a native Lithuanian - was rated as implausible.
People seem to like the idea, but I don't really have an opinion one way or the other on Australia.That is the main point where we disagree. What do the others think? @Ferd42 , @mikroraptor , @Hindustani Person , @ETGalaxy , @YaaItsRewindTime , @Gabzcervo et al. - do yo uthink there is an established consensus about the division of Australia into a Libertarian-Democratic West Australia and a communist/syndicalist/far-left East Australia?
The reason I don't think Baltoslavia makes sense is the same reason that the Intermarium doesn't make sense to me in this scenario. It's antithetical to Germany and Russia's Imperial ambitions in the east.
.to the outskirts of Moscow
As a potential solution, I propose that instead of a runoff poll, @Hindustani Person use the benevolent dictatorship powers they have by making a ruling on the vote if it is within a three-vote margin
Good question. Also, I have some ideas for China, which might conflict with the map. But China will probably still be balkanized, though maybe not as muchWhy is Russia split in three? Also, why is China balkanized?