Oh YES!Or, if we're going that route, why not have some television ads for Expedition Everest, where Frank Wells dresses up as a yeti to scare the average parkgoer.
Oh YES!Or, if we're going that route, why not have some television ads for Expedition Everest, where Frank Wells dresses up as a yeti to scare the average parkgoer.
Not to be pedantic, but my accident was caused by a computer error and not any engineering errors. Kinda like what happened OTL, but more severe so that the animatronic actually comes loose.Now that would be a bit more appropriate for an ironic death instead of having the Imagineers become literal brain-dead morons for comedic purposes.
Or, if we're going that route, why not have some television ads for Expedition Everest, where Frank Wells dresses up as a yeti to scare the average parkgoer.
If Mr. Wells doesn't want to stand on the edge of a 30 ft. drop all day just to scare guests he could at least make some short mockumentaries about his trip to the Himalayas and how he might had someone or something follow him back to promote the ride.Maybe Wells could pretended that some strange creature bit him when he was on Everest and he could pretend to show “yeti symptoms” before putting on a yeti costume on the expedition Everest ride.
How about we use Expedition Everest to refurbish the Matterhorn attraction entirely?However since DAK isn't even planned yet, I assume that we won't see the ride come to fruition. Especially since Disney mainly built the it to attract people to DAK which was struggling to find its audience.
How would the Everest theme fit with either Fantasyland or Tomorrowland?How about we use Expedition Everest to refurbish the Matterhorn attraction entirely?
Oh, I was assuming that the Matterhorn was in Adventureland.How would the Everest theme fit with either Fantasyland or Tomorrowland?
How about we use Expedition Everest to refurbish the Matterhorn attraction entirely?
I don't think Expedition Everest would fit into Disneyland.How would the Everest theme fit with either Fantasyland or Tomorrowland?
I think DAK is inevitable since Jim Henson and Roy Disney might be interested in promoting animal conservation after DisneySea's success (not to mention Busch Gardens Tampa). People keep treating it like it's going to happen (including myself) so I guess it's going to happen sooner or later in the 2000s.However since DAK isn't even planned yet, I assume that we won't see the ride come to fruition. Especially since Disney mainly built the it to attract people to DAK which was struggling to find its audience.
Wow, we're really milking this Frank Wells reference LOL. As we should.If Mr. Wells doesn't want to stand on the edge of a 30 ft. drop all day just to scare guests he could at least make some short mockumentaries about his trip to the Himalayas and how he might had someone or something follow him back to promote the ride.
Oh, I was assuming that the Matterhorn was in Adventureland.
It's technically a Fantasyland ride, but IIRC the Matterhorn was originally a Tomorrowland ride.And just rethemeing the existing Matterhorn would be lame compared to OTL and probably very unpopular with guest. Like I imagine Mr. Toad level of fan backlash.
Wouldn't work. A Spike Lee adaptation needs to have at least one white lion yelling "YOU DON'T BELONG IN THE PRIDELANDS!!!" at the top of his lungs.Imagine… The Lion King, A Spike Lee Joint.
🥴🥴Wouldn't work. A Spike Lee adaptation needs to have at least one white lion yelling "YOU DON'T BELONG IN THE PRIDELANDS!!!" at the top of his lungs.
Isn't that basically how exiling was portrayed in the first direct-to-video sequel that adapted Romeo and Juliet instead of Hamlet?Wouldn't work. A Spike Lee adaptation needs to have at least one white lion yelling "YOU DON'T BELONG IN THE PRIDELANDS!!!" at the top of his lungs.
... I don't recall Simba using the N-word in that one.Isn't that basically how exiling was portrayed in the first direct-to-video sequel that adapted Romeo and Juliet instead of Hamlet?
Not like that, but more like the basic idea of "privileged lion forcing unprivileged lion to live in the slums".... I don't recall Simba using the N-word in that one.
In fairness, Kovu was believed to be guilty of treason and attempted regicide at the time.Not like that, but more like the basic idea of "privileged lion forcing unprivileged lion to live in the slums".
Yeah, but it was pretty close to ghetto banishment in this specific view.In fairness, Kovu was believed to be guilty of treason and attempted regicide at the time.
Not Simba's fault Scar had loyalists who wouldnt get with the new king. Territory is territory.Not like that, but more like the basic idea of "privileged lion forcing unprivileged lion to live in the slums".
Goes all the way back to TLK1 - people have even written papers about it.