Malta ITTL.
There are as a result of the numerous changes that have arisen ITTL, between Malta IOTL and Malta ITTL. Unlike IOTL were the Siege lasted for close to two years, and Malta was one of the most heavily bombed areas on earth, during World War II. ITTL the siege has only been for just over one year, and the bombing hasn’t been as intense. The British haven’t had in desperation had to try to run heavily escorted convoys from Gibraltar, at great cost, to try to keep Malta supplied. Malta based submarines haven’t had to submerge to the bottom of the harbour and sit out the daylight hours to avoid being sunk at their moorings, thus depriving their crews of the opportunity to rest in comfort between patrols. While the garrison and population of the Islands have suffered significant hardships, and the Islands major damage to their infrastructure. This will be no where near as bad as it was IOTL.Where it wasn’t for a number of reasons, still until the nineteen sixties still trying to repair damage from the siege.
The siege of Malta now being effectively over, the authorities will now be able to implement a number of much needed measures. The garrison who have suffered along side the population, should soon be relieved and replaced with new units, and given the opportunity to completely reequip and refresh. Officers and men who are due for promotion, training or transfer, sent away and replaced with new recruits. The RAF, should be able to introduce a more British system for primary the fighter squadrons, with the squadrons being rotated regularly between service on the Island and rebuilding in North Africa. Thus avoiding both overstraining the pilots by subjecting them to continuous service, and feeding replacements in peace mill. The RN should be able to base lighter units, up to destroyers in Malta and begin to make use of the extensive dockyards, and the numerous skilled workers available. This along with the ability to base light bombers on the Island, will enable the British to take a more aggressive approach towards both Sicily and Southern Italy. One that will in time ether cause the Italian establishment to remove Benito from power, and seek an accommodation with Britain. Or be a part of the preparations for an invasion of Sicily, before the eventual invasion of the Mainland of Italy.
The much shorter length of the siege, along with the reduction in damage and casualties on Malta, might have an effect on Post War relations, between Malta and the United Kingdom. There is a good chance that, with the UK having suffered less damage ITTL than it did in ours, along with the fact that by retaining Burma and Malaya. The UK will be in a position to enjoy the income from these two highly profitable colonies, which it lost IOTL, throughout the war and temporarily post war. Along with the much lower costs of the war in total, shorter campaigns in Africa and the Middle East, lower losses in the Atlantic, thanks to the shorter Mediterranean campaign. All of this should mean that the UK, is in a position provide some financial support and relief Post War. Which it didn’t do IOTL, for a number of reasons, which caused much resentment among the Maltese people, who saw the massive investment in Britain by the Post War Labour. And this resentment was only increased by the fact that Malta as a British Colony, wasn’t entitled for relief under the rules, from the Marshal Plan. There is no question that Malta was very hard done by in the aftermath of WWII, and hopefully Britains better position financially ITTL, will allow Malta to receive some of the help in its recovery and rebuilding efforts that it deserves.
RR.