"Io Mihailŭ, Împĕratul Românilor" - A Michael the Brave Romania Wank

Secret... I expect more people trying to guess it.
Hint: There are 20 ethnic minorities in Romania :p (excluding any recent immigrants). And I do not think there are any ethnic Hungarian which are Romanian nationalists. :rolleyes:

Hmmm... Is 'Zagan' an alternate spelling of 'țigan', perhaps? Rom-anian?
 

Zagan

Donor
Hmmm... Is 'Zagan' an alternate spelling of 'țigan', perhaps? Rom-anian?

LOL, Zagan is a name which sounds very Romanian and somehow archaic. Someone called like this would probably be a descendant of a very old and respectable Romanian family.
My actual name does not sound Romanian at all, because it is not.

By the way, are you actually from Ísland? Because you seem to be in the USA.

Oh, and I almost forgot, Thanks for the comments!
 
Last edited:
I.19. The Tatar War

Zagan

Donor
The unexpected conquest of the Tatar Khanate removed an important foe
and let Romania and Poland-Lithuania focus elsewhere
having their eastern and respectively southern borders finally secure.


The Tatar War



The Money

Romania was an immensely rich country. It had large amounts of gold, silver, iron, coal, oil and other mineral resources, lots of extremely fertile arable land, plenty of forests, lakes and rivers, unhindered access to the Sea, control of half of the course of the Danube etc.

However, it did not have cash, yet.
Most of the money received from Austria have been transferred to the Ottoman Empire as payment for:
- Unpaid tribute for Wallachia (1595-1600);
- Unpaid tribute for Transylvania (1599-1600);
- Unpaid tribute for Moldavia (1600);
- Unpaid tribute for the United Romanian Lands (1601);
- Annual tribute for Romania (1602);
- Annual tribute for Slovakia (1602), paid by Romania as well per the bilateral agreement with Slovakia;
- Payment for western Banat, western Partium, the three Danube Kazas, Bessarabia and Edisan;
- Annual tribute (1603).

More money has been spent on weapons, soldiers' wages, mines, roads, ships, fortresses and castles, The Palace of the Senat, Mihai's Palace, The Patriarchal Palace, The Patriarchal Cathedral etc.

By the end of 1602, the state coffers were almost empty again.
Mihai did not want to lose the support of his people by increasing the already heavy taxation. The foreign nobles were long gone, the Germans, Szeklers and Hungarians were protected nations, the peasants had no money, the benevolence of the boyars and clergy was...
Who else had money? Obviously the Jews.


10 November 1602, The Expulsion of the Jews

As always, the Jews were ideal scape-goats.
Mihai asked them for loans. When they started talking about interest, Mihai said abruptly that charging interest was against the teachings of the Church and as they were living in a Christian country they had to obey its laws.
When they declined to lend money without charging any interest, Mihai proclaimed them enemies of the State, confiscated their fortunes and had all of them expelled from Romania pennyless.
More than 3000 Jews left Romania for Poland during the following weeks.

Romania finally agreed in 1999 to transfer that amount of gold to the Kingdom of Israel during the normalization of the Romanian-Israeli relations. (no more spoilers)


The Opposing Forces

The Black Sea Alliance military strength amounted up to a staggering 200,000 men:
- Romanian Army (80,000)
- Szeklers (2,000)
- Polish-Lithuanian Army (60,000)
- Mercenaries hired by Poland-Lithuania (18,000)
- Polish irregulars / Zaporozhian Cossacks (14,000)
- Prussian Army (4,000)
- Livonian Army (1,500)
- Russian Army (7,000)
- Russian irregulars / Don Cossacks (11,000)
- Slovak Army (2,500)

The Tatars were able to get around 90,000 men but the geography and demographics (or bettter said lack thereof) of the war theatre were greatly in their favour.
At least 3,000 Nogay and Circassian volunteers fought on the Tatar side.
The Turks were officially neutral but made a lot of money by selling weapons to the Tatars, hindered the maneuvers of the Romanian ships in the Sea of Azov and collected heavy fees in the Strait of Kerch.


The Strategy

First of all, the conquest of the northern Black Sea coast was given absolute priority in Poland-Lithuania. The importance of getting access to the Black Sea, securing its southern territories and destroying once and for all the Tatar scourge was an opportunity which might not appear a second time in history.

The greatest problem was recognized to be that of logistics and especially of feeding all those soldiers advancing into a deserted, unforgivable steppe.
Since Russia had just experienced an awful famine in the previous years, Poland agreed to feed the Russian and Cossack armies free of charge. The campaign was really that important!

The food and the other supplies were mainly distributed by ship where possible (down the Southern Bug and the Dnieper from Poland, down the Don from Russia and along the Black Sea and the Azov Sea coasts from Romania).
An enormous number of auxiliars, almost 100,000 were hired in Poland to support the advancing armies and carry gigantic quantities of supplies in countless wagons and carts.
The advance would be of course painfully slow but time and money were not considered an issue.


23 February - 30 March 1603, Invasion of the Crimean Khanate

Almost 300,000 soldiers and auxiliars entered virtually unopposed the almost uninhabited border regions of the Crimean Khanate and started a slow but inexorable advance towards its core.


The Romanian Theatre

The Romanians, Slovaks and Szeklers crossed the Southern Bug near its mouth and advanced towards the mouth of the Dnieper, being occasionally harrassed by small Tatar units. The supply issue was mostly nonexistent since the three Romanian vessels enjoyed complete naval superiority, the Tatars having almost no ships of their own.

The Romanians occupied the coast between the Southern Bug and the Dnieper in about a week, without engaging in any major battle.
The plan was to cross the Dnieper and advance on the coast towards Perekop but the Tatar forces around the Inguleț (Inhulets) River could pose a serious danger by falling on the Romanians' back.

Mihai decided to postpone the crossing of the Dnieper and occupy its right bank first, between its mouth and the Inguleț River.
At the battle of Inguleț, the Tatars were thoroughly defeated but the Romanians lost more than 2000 men.
Mihai sent 5000 men on the other side of the Inguleț to follow the retreating Tatars all the way to the Polish border, while the bulk of his army crossed the Dnieper and followed its course back to its mouth.

In the meantime, a smaller Romanian force from Oceacov crossed the Dnieper Estuary and met with Mihai's army near the mouth of the Dnieper.
From there, they headed Southwards and then Eastwards following the coast all the way to the Perekop Isthmus and namesake fortress.
The Romanians were only stopped by a large Tatar army a few miles West of Perekop.


The Polish Theatre

The Poles, Lithuanians, their Prussians and Livonians vassals and the mercenaries headed Southwards, down the mighty Dnieper. Their advance was slow but continuous and they fought no major battles before arriving at the last bend of the Dnieper, being mostly supplied by boats or ships sailing on the Dnieper.

After the Dnieper curved West towards the Sea, the Allied armies left the comfort provided by it and headed straight South through the lifeless steppe, on the shortest route to Perekop.
The advance was slower but uneventful with the exception of a major battle won decisively by the Poles.


The Russian Theatre

The small Russian army advanced on the right bank of the River Don towards the Sea of Azov. They encountered almost no organized resistance but had serious difficulties with their supply lines. The Russians could not use the Don as planned because the Nogay Tatars on its left bank attacked anything sailing on the river.

The Cossacks from both Poland and Russia invaded directly through the steppe harrassing the Tatars and providing additional support to the main armies when needed.

By the time the Russians reached the Sea of Azov, the other allies were already converging on Perekop.
The Russians were relieved to find a Romanian ship full of much needed supplies and, after a small break, their slow and difficult journey Westwards began on the coast of the Azov Sea.


31 March 1603, Salt Field West of Perekop

The Romanians were badly defeated in the Battle of the Salt Field, a mere 20 miles West of Perekop.
By the end of the day, the Romanians lost more than 8000 men and were retreating in disarray. Luckily, the Tatars were not able to pursue because of the approaching Polish-Lithuanian army.

The Romanians recovered after their losses and began to mop up any remaining pockets of Tatar resistance while the Poles lay siege on Perekop.


1 April - 14 July 1603, Siege of Perekop and Azov Sea Campaign

The Polish-Lithuanian army split in two after reaching Perekop. One half lay siege on the Perekop fortress and awaited its fall which would allow them to finally enter Crimea. The other half speeded along the Azov Sea coast to meet the Russians as far East as possible.
The weak and disorganized Tatars at the North of the Azov Sea found themselves caught between the Poles in the West, the Russians in the East, the Cossacks in the North and the Romanian ships guarding the Sea in the South.


15 July 1603, Sea of Azov Coast

The Polish-Lithuanian army and the Russian army met on the Azov Littoral.
The last remaining Tatar forces from the mainland capitulated in the following weeks.
By August all of the Crimean Khanate territory outside the Crimean Peninsula was in the possession of the Black Sea Allies.


24 July 1603, Perekop

The defenders from Perekop attempted to flee the besieged city but were crushed in a clear one-sided battle.
The following day, Perekop fell and the way to the Crimean heartland was open.


29 July 1603, Crimea

The Ottoman forces from Caffa entered the Crimean Khanate from the South and proceeded North towards the incoming Polish-Lithuanian army.
The Ottoman ambassadors in Slovakia, Romania and Poland-Lithuania threatened with war if the Allies did not stop their advance in Crimea.

Romania and Slovakia replied that they had no armies in Crimea and since the military campaign was already over for them, they should be considered non-beligerants.
Poland-Lithuania decided to prosecute the war alone and conquer all the Crimean Peninsula.


1-27 August 1603, Crimea

The Ottomans controlled the Southern part of Crimea while the Poles managed to occupy its Northern part. They clashed in the centre of the Peninsula.
The Ottomans slowly prevailed, pushing the Poles all the way to Perekop.
The Polish-Lithuanian army retreated in good order and reinforced the Perekop Isthmus and fortress.

The Ottomans had occupied the whole Crimean Peninsula but had neither the means nor the desire to invade the steppe.
They wanted however to capture Perekop and attempted to occupy it but failed. And because Perekop could be indefinitely supplied from the North, the Ottomans had no chance of besieging it either.

In these conditions the fighting slowly ceased and peace negotiations began.
 
Last edited:
By the way, are you actually from Ísland? Because you seem to be in the USA.

I'm a quarter Icelandic, Dad's mom's parents emigrated before 1900.
Geirr came to the US, knowing only that his sweetheart was 'in America', not speaking English, and with almost no money. He found her and married her. (That sounds ASB, but the Icelandic community was small enough that every new member would have been noted by SOMEONE.)
 
Map #5. The Tatar War

Zagan

Donor

The Tatar War


Tatar War.png

Legend:
1.
Ottoman Empire
2. Tsardom of Russia

Note: Romania, Slovakia, the Nogays, the Circassians and the Khanate of Crimea are Ottoman vassals.
 
Last edited:
So what exactly is Michael's formal title?He called himself the Voivode of Romania earlier,but nowadays in your timeline,Voivode is a title given to quite a number of commanders.He's not pulling the Colonel Gaddafi thing where a colonel rules over the state right?
 

Zagan

Donor
So what exactly is Michael's formal title?He called himself the Voivode of Romania earlier,but nowadays in your timeline,Voivode is a title given to quite a number of commanders.He's not pulling the Colonel Gaddafi thing where a colonel rules over the state right?

Io Mihailŭ, Mare Voevod și Domn al României
Io Michael, Great Voivode and Lord of Romania


Io = Traditional voivodal particle, possibly from Ioan, Emperor of the Bulgaro-Vlach Empire, now with the approximate meaning of By the very grace of God.

Great Voivode = Head of the Army, Dux Bellorum / Bellidux and Supreme Judge.
Voivode = Lesser military leader.

Lord = Domnitor, Dominus, Head of State (and Government)

These are all common meanings both TTL and OTL, both before and after Mihai Viteazul.
 
Last edited:
Map #6. Partition of the Crimean Khanate

Zagan

Donor
Disclaimer: Although the Perekop Treaty chapter is not yet completely finished (it will be today), the maps are ready, so here they are:


Partition of the Crimean Khanate

Balkans 1604 Peace.png

Legend:

1. Ottoman vassals (Slovakia, Romania, Nogay Tatars, Circassians)
2. Territory annexed by Russia (up to the Azov Sea and River Kalmius)
3. Territory annexed by Poland-Lithuania (between the Dnieper and the Kalmius, up to the Black ans Azov Seas)
4. Territory initially promised to Romania (between the Southern Bug and the Dnieper), eventually annexed by Poland-Lithuania as well (Romania got 7 and 8 as compensation)
5. Rump Crimean Khanate (the Crimean Peninsula), directly annexed by the Ottoman Empire an year later, per the Tatar's request.
6. Perekop Isthmus (buffer between Poland-Lithuania and the Ottoman Empire), annexed by Slovakia as an external territory (like a colony)
7. Pokuttya, Polish territory ceded to Romania (as compensation for 4)
8. Small area of southern Podolia, Polish territory ceded to Romania (as compensation for 4)
9. Ottoman Azov
10. Ottoman Caffa, subsequently integrated into Ottoman Crimea


The Aftermath

Balkans 1605.png

Note: I think that Poland-Lithuania was by far the biggest winner here. Poland is stronk!


Detail of Slovak Perekop

Slovak Perekop.png
.
 
Last edited:
I.20. Treaty of Perekop

Zagan

Donor
After 4 centuries, the people from the Black Sea Steppe were safe from predation.
The darkest period in the history of Eastern Europe was finally over.


Treaty of Perekop



September 1603

Poland-Lithuania, although beaten in Crimea by the combined forces of the Tatars and the Ottomans, was in an exceptionally good position.
With less than 10,000 casualties (about 10%), it managed to push its Southern border all the way to the Black Sea. To put this in a perspective, the Commonwealth lost about 20,000 men each year, taken as slaves by the Tatars during their raids. So it was definitely worth it.
The end of the Tatar raids was probably more valuable than the land conquered and the secured access to the Black Sea. Millions of people celebrated for days, overwhelmed with joy because of the sudden and unexpected change in their lives. It was no insignificant issue, as from now on they would not live in fear anymore.
The victory was indeed so great that it was almost hard to comprehend.

Russia and the Don Cossacks lost more than 12,000 men (about 70%), but managed to conquer a large swath of steppe and, more importantly, to get a small outlet at the Azov Sea. They also annihilated another menacing Tatar Khanate. As Astrakhan had been already conquered, the only Tatars bordering Russia were the Nogays, on the other bank of the Don. The Russians planned to deal with them in the future as well.
The fact that they did not manage to get the border at the middle point of the Azov Sea as initially promissed aroused an enduring grudge against the Poles.

Romania lost about 16,000 men (about 20%) and was the only one of the allies to decisively lose a battle against the Tatars. The morale of the troops was low and the area conquered deserted and almost of no use.
The fact that the Ottomans threatened war if Romania annexed any more Ottoman (i.e. Tatar) territory only made things worse. The battered Romanian army started to retreat towards Edisan, the Poles taking their place on both banks of the Dnieper.
The only success was the end of the rather infrequent Tatar raids in Edisan and Bessarabia. The feeling of too much loss for too little gain prevailed.

Slovakia lost more than 2000 men (about 90%) having their small expeditionary force almost obliterated. In fact, their performance against the Tatars was abbysmal but on the other hand it was clearly not their war, since Slovakia was not threatened by the Tatars in any way.
They went to war only in order to honour their Alliance, not to gain anything.

The Ottoman Empire never actually controlled the Crimean Khanate and certainly not the Steppe so, at least in theory, they did not lose anything.
In fact, the loss was considerable since no more cheap slaves would ever again show up in the markets of Caffa. Instead of economically benefiting from the Tatars, the Ottomans ended up subsidizing them.
The fact that the Ottoman Empire did not actively support the Tatars from the beginning and accepted the loss of the Steppe was the second critical mistake made by Sultan Mehmed III, who will be called Mehmed III the Stupid by the later generations. The first critical mistake was obviously the Treaty of Pressburg, which allowed a Romania so big and powerful that any Ottoman suzerainty would only be nominal at most.

The Crimean Khanate lost more than 80% of its territory, only 20% of its population and all means of a continued independent economical life, since more than half of its economy was based on their raids, now rendered impossible. The Crimean Peninsula had not enough arable land for subsistence agriculture and the Tatars were not peasants after all and did not enjoy honest work at that time.
Even the continued statehood of their rump country was unsure since all of Crimea was under Ottoman occupation.


15 September 1603, Perekop, Khanate of Crimea

The negotiations were finished quickly. Two things were certain:
1. The Ottomans could not hope to conquer the Steppe.
2. The Poles could not hope to conquer the Peninsula.

The only real contentious issue was the Isthmus of Perekop and its namesake fortress still held by the Polish-Lithuanian army.
The Ottomans would not sign any peace treaty that would leave Perekop in Polish hands and the Poles would not accept to cede it to the Ottomans.

To break the deadlock it was proposed to give the fortress to a third party.
The Ottomans did not want Romania to get it and the Poles did not want the Russians there so in the end it became a Slovak exclave, a kind of an oversees colony, a mere buffer between the Ottoman Empire and the Commonwealth.
Thus, the Ottomans saved face because the Slovaks were still technically an Ottoman vassal and the Poles were happy to have their short southern land border covered by Slovakia which was almost a Polish Puppet being ruled by a Polish Prince and having its economy closely interwoven with the greater Polish economy.

Treaty of Perekop

I. The state of war between the signatories is over. They promise to attempt to live in peace with one another in the future.

II. The Crimean Khanate cedes the Steppe East of the Kalmius River to the Russian Tsardom.

III. The Crimean Khanate cedes the rest of the Steppe North of Perekop to the Commonwealth of Poland-Lithuania.

IV. The Crimean Khanate cedes the fortress of Perekop and the adjacent land on the Perekop Isthmus to the Ottoman vassal of Slovakia. The annexed map is authorative. Slovakia shall not keep more than 1000 soldiers in Perekop at any time.

V. Romania, Poland-Lithuania and Russia shall survey and set up their borders by common accord.

VI. All prisoners shall be returned safe to their countries. All Tatars who choose to leave the Steppe in order to live in Muslim Land shall be allowed to leave with all their movable belongings. All Tatars who choose to stay in the Christian States shall be allowed to practice their Muslim faith unobstructed.

VII. Freedom of navigation on the Black Sea and Azov Sea is guaranteed. All Ottoman, Tatar, Russian, Polish-Lithuanian, Romanian and Slovaks ships both civilian and military are allowed to sail unobstructed on the whole surface of the Black and Azov Seas in time of peace. All Christian ships shall pay a toll if they desire to pass through the Turkish Straits into the Mediterranian Sea.

VIII. Freedom of navigation on the Danube and the Tissa is guaranteed. All Ottoman, Romanian and Slovak ships may sail up or down the Danube and Tissa without paying any tolls. Any foreign ships will have to pay tolls when entering the Ottoman, Romanian or Slovak segments of these rivers.

IX. No reparations will be paid by any signatory. All financial claimes are forfeited.

Signed by the plenipotentiaries of:
Ottoman Empire
Crimean Khanate
Commonwealth of Poland-Lithuania
Duchy of Prussia
Duchy of Livonia
Tsardom of Russia
Principality of Romania
Principality of Slovakia



29 September 1603, Colomeea, Pocuția, Poland-Lithuania (Kolomea / Kolomiya, Pokuttya)

Treaty of Colomeea

I. Poland-Lithuania is and will be forever thankful to the unparalleled theoretical and practical help generously provided by Romania in the war against the Tatars. Poland-Lithuania and Romania will be forever best friends and close allies and no other country or interest will ever stay between their sacred friendship and alliance.

II. In exchange for the Tatar Steppe between the rivers Bug and Dnieper promissed to Romania before the war and which is now recognized as Polish-Lithuanian land, the Commonwealth of Poland-Lithuania cedes in perpetuity and without any ill thoughts to Romania the land of Pokuttya and a small piece of land by the River Dniester belonging to the land of Pololia. Romania will administer these lands in any way it sees fit. May the new border between our Realms be eternal.

III. All Jews from the ceded territories will emigrate to Poland-Lithuania as they are not allowed to reside in Romania. All Poles and Ruthenes living in the ceded territories may emigrate if they so desire. All emigrants may take with them anything they can and desire. Poland-Lithuania will take care of their well-being and compensate them for their loss of land with lands in the Polish-Lithuanian new Southern territories.

Signed by:
King Sigismund III (titles), representing the Commonwealth of Poland-Lithuania, having the assent of the Sejm
Great Voivode and Lord Mihailu of Romania, representing Romania


I am not sure if they actually believed that the Polish-Romanian border would really stay unchanged through the centuries, defying time. But it did.
 
Last edited:
Map #7. Romania after the Tatar War and the Treaty of Colomeea

Zagan

Donor
Romania after the Tatar War and the Treaty of Colomeea


Romania 1604.png

Note: This will be the last map of this series, since after the next territorial expansion, Romania would surely not fit on this map anymore.
From now on, only the other series of maps (those showing South-Eastern Europe) will be used.

Romania will not expand further for quite a long time and the updates / chapters will cover longer periods of TTL time (no war, no fun, less to write about...)
 
Last edited:
Io Mihailŭ, Mare Voevod și Domn al României
Io Michael, Great Voivode and Lord of Romania

Io = Traditional voivodal particle, possibly from Ioan, Emperor of the Bulgaro-Vlach Empire, now with the approximate meaning of By the very grace of God.

Great Voivode = Head of the Army, Dux Bellorum / Bellidux and Supreme Judge.
Voivode = Lesser military leader.

Lord = Domnitor, Dominus, Head of State (and Government)

These are all common meanings both TTL and OTL, both before and after Mihai Viteazul.
Is there a reason as to why Michael calls himself a Lord as opposed to a king?Once again,it's like the Colonel Gaddafi situation where the head of state calls himself a Colonel.
 

Zagan

Donor
Is there a reason as to why Michael calls himself a Lord as opposed to a king?Once again,it's like the Colonel Gaddafi situation where the head of state calls himself a Colonel.

Yes it is.
An Ottoman vassal (which Romania still is, at least in theory) is not allowed to call himself a king.
So, at least for the time being, that is out of the question. Romania is a Principality, not a Kingdom and will remain so until full independence from the Ottoman Empire would be secured.
 
Last edited:
Yes it is.
An Ottoman vassal (which Romania still is, at least in theory) is not allowed to call himself a king.
So, at least for the time being, that is out of the question. Romania is a Principality, not a Kingdom and will remain so until full independence from the Ottoman Empire would be secured.
A good number of Ottoman vassals called themselves Kings.For example, Hungary under the Zapolyas was a kingdom under the vassalage of the Ottomans.The title Khan was also technically equivalent to the title of king and it was used by the rulers of Crimea.The Ottomans also tolerated the Emperor of the ERE retaining his title of Emperor when they turned the ERE into a vassal.
 

Zagan

Donor
A good number of Ottoman vassals called themselves Kings.For example, Hungary under the Zapolyas was a kingdom under the vassalage of the Ottomans.The title Khan was also technically equivalent to the title of king and it was used by the rulers of Crimea.The Ottomans also tolerated the Emperor of the ERE retaining his title of Emperor when they turned the ERE into a vassal.

Sure. But in all those cases they already had that title.
They would simply not allow that a previous Principality be turned into a Kingdom. This was anyway a line in the sand at the TTL Pressburg Peace Conference.
Anyway, Mihai has plans to crown himself Emperor, not King. He is just buying his time now.
 
Last edited:
Sorry to intervene, but the title of Domn/Domnitor is translated in English as Lord but it's far more than just a Lord in a feudal meaning. Another corespondent is Prince. (in English, God is also called Lord).

In Romanian, "Domn" had many meanings and was as powerful as king (or even more) in collective mental, while the notion of King was quite alien, a western stuff.

Higher title than Domn was only the Emperor.

However, I thing that the chosen term of Voivode for military ranks is not quite the most fortunate. It is a slavic term that has that meaning but only among the Slavic nations, not for Romanians. By 1600 the term of Great Voivode was not merry used, remaining only the Voivode. Initialy, it was Great Voivode to differentiate himself from the others Voivodes, which were not only military commanders, but also "Domn" for a smaller principality.

I hope it helps...
 
Sure. But in all those cases they already had that title.
They would simply not allow that a previous Principality be turned into a Kingdom. This was anyway a line in the sand at the TTL Pressburg Peace Conference.
Anyway, Mihai has plans to crown himself Emperor, not King. He is just buying his time now.

So he is one of those over the top pretentious eastern European rulers who loves to claim a grandiose title that's clearly mismatched with the size and stature of his country?
 

Zagan

Donor
Sorry to intervene, but the title of Domn/Domnitor is translated in English as Lord but it's far more than just a Lord in a feudal meaning. Another corespondent is Prince. (in English, God is also called Lord).

In Romanian, "Domn" had many meanings and was as powerful as king (or even more) in collective mental, while the notion of King was quite alien, a western stuff.

Higher title than Domn was only the Emperor.

However, I thing that the chosen term of Voivode for military ranks is not quite the most fortunate. It is a slavic term that has that meaning but only among the Slavic nations, not for Romanians. By 1600 the term of Great Voivode was not merry used, remaining only the Voivode. Initialy, it was Great Voivode to differentiate himself from the others Voivodes, which were not only military commanders, but also "Domn" for a smaller principality.

I hope it helps...

Thank you. You are correct.
This is a period of experiments with all kind of things, including titles.
Many will change quickly, some even several times. Nothing is set in stone.

So he is one of those over the top pretentious eastern European rulers who loves to claim a grandiose title that's clearly mismatched with the size and stature of his country?

By the time Mihai is Emperor, his country would be the second-largest in Europe, only Poland-Lithuania being somewhat bigger. (you know, this is after all a wank)
 
Last edited:
Sorry to intervene, but the title of Domn/Domnitor is translated in English as Lord but it's far more than just a Lord in a feudal meaning. Another corespondent is Prince. (in English, God is also called Lord).

In Romanian, "Domn" had many meanings and was as powerful as king (or even more) in collective mental, while the notion of King was quite alien, a western stuff.

Higher title than Domn was only the Emperor.

However, I thing that the chosen term of Voivode for military ranks is not quite the most fortunate. It is a slavic term that has that meaning but only among the Slavic nations, not for Romanians. By 1600 the term of Great Voivode was not merry used, remaining only the Voivode. Initialy, it was Great Voivode to differentiate himself from the others Voivodes, which were not only military commanders, but also "Domn" for a smaller principality.

I hope it helps...
I'm mainly talking about his title for western consumption,namely in latin.Formal titles in Europe are mainly in Latin.

Thank you. You are correct.
This is a period of experiments with all kind of things, including titles.
Many will change quickly, some even several times. Nothing is set in stone.



By the time Mihai is Emperor, his country would be the second-largest in Europe, only Poland-Lithuania being somewhat bigger. (you know, this is after all a wank)

Wouldn't that have made him quite a pariah?If the Commonwealth didn't declare themselves to be an empire and they are bigger,Romania could be seen as an upstart and pretty pretentious.I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of neighbouring countries will reject calling Michael an Emperor and insist upon calling him a king,causing unnecessary diplomatic disputes as well as a loss of prestige from being mocked.
 
Last edited:
Top