Maybe only people who say that Yunnan is a bastion of human rights and democracy are the ones who make it out alive...Since when is Yunnan a bastion of human rights and democracy? What happened?
Maybe only people who say that Yunnan is a bastion of human rights and democracy are the ones who make it out alive...Since when is Yunnan a bastion of human rights and democracy? What happened?
This is my idea for TTLs Democracy Index ranking, in the form of a map:
What do you think about it?
And here is the Index of Press and Net Freedom.
it’s bad teamwork that goes against the collaborative nature of this project.
This might seem like a dumb question, @Red Arturoist, but what does EFDG stand for? It probably is what I was referring to, but I am not entirely sure
I was thinking, would it make sense for people to "claim" a country, and do most of the worldbuilding for that country? Like I have done for Montana and Ireland, @Red Arturoist is doing for Germany, and @Ferd42 is doing for Britain. If you guys approve, I could quickly whip up a claim map. I would also include some provisions for splitting the work on a country, or only working on a specific time period. What do you think?
I would heed objections etc., but as I get few objections (e.g. I will probably change the freedom index of Britain as @Ferd42 noted), it does not seem that people who collaborate here don't like my work. I am also planning to develop some lore on Germany and parts of Europe. @Ferd42 is developing things in Britain, @mikroraptor in Ireland and China (and other regions), @Hindustani Person in India. So we are developing this TL.
I was thinking, would it make sense for people to "claim" a country, and do most of the worldbuilding for that country? Like I have done for Montana and Ireland, @Red Arturoist is doing for Germany, and @Ferd42 is doing for Britain. If you guys approve, I could quickly whip up a claim map. I would also include some provisions for splitting the work on a country, or only working on a specific time period. What do you think?
You have a good point here. We can use the claim map later onI'm not commenting on specific instances, I'm saying that the development of the TL has to be chronological, otherwise it simply doesn't make sense. I am aware that the TL is being developed – that’s good. The problem is it’s not being developed enough; while everyone else is developing detailed lore for specific regions, making a map of the modern world is unnecessary. disregards both the reality of the progression of history and also the effort that other people are making by developing detailed lore. My thing is that you can’t just determine the entire course of world history, and then make small adjustments every time someone questions something.
I’m honestly not convinced by this idea. I feel that if we divide the world into small parts which are developed independently, each part will be developed in isolation without necessarily taking into account events elsewhere in the world that will bear an impact on events in each region. I don’t mind once we have developed an overall view of world history, people develop certain countries or regions in more detail – in fact that would be good – but we must have an idea of the course of global history first and foremost. I feel it’s important that a moderately detailed history of the world be developed by everyone before people split off.
I leave Baltoslavia to youI very much approve of this, and I would claim most of Eurpe except for Britain (@Ferd42 's area), Ireland (your area, @mikroraptor ) and the Baltoslavic Union (I would love to leave it to @Augenis ).
EDIT: I of course will respect your work on Poland, too, and I (currently at least) lack detailed ideas for Romania and Bulgaria. I'll also allow collaboration (e.g. with @BlackCrown on Spain), but I do have ideas for much of Europe.
And to be honest, on most of Africa, too.
You have a good point here. We can use the claim map later on
I’m honestly not convinced by this idea. I feel that if we divide the world into small parts which are developed independently, each part will be developed in isolation without necessarily taking into account events elsewhere in the world that will bear an impact on events in each region. I don’t mind once we have developed an overall view of world history, people develop certain countries or regions in more detail – in fact that would be good – but we must have an idea of the course of global history first and foremost. I feel it’s important that a moderately detailed history of the world be developed by everyone before people split off.
My thing is that you can’t just determine the entire course of world history, and then make small adjustments every time someone questions something.
I fully agreeI’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: the history of the world must be decided before we work on the modern day. Historical events are what determine the nature of the modern world, and so creating detailed maps of the modern world is not only disregarding the influence of historical events on society, but it’s also effectively dictating the past. Given there is only really solid lore up until the 1930s, deciding the makeup of the world 90 years on is premature at best, and forces everyone to work within the constraints you’ve established. Thus making maps like this (which, by showing something so specific like press freedom, effectively dictates the regime types of every nation in the world) is not only bad worldbuilding, it’s bad teamwork that goes against the collaborative nature of this project. I would once again urge everyone - not just you - to focus on developing the history of this world in a logical - and chronological - manner.
Have we agreed on Japan yet? I myself am with @KaiserEmu here, but I find that a poll would be most useful.View attachment 488239
China in 1937
Have we agreed on Japan yet? I myself am with @KaiserEmu here, but I find that a poll would be most useful.
My idea for Japan was: the "Democratic Republic of Japan" seen on my maps has little effective control over its territory, being essentially an anarchy. During and after ww2, Rodzhaevsky backs the Japanese Empire in exile, causing it to return to power, and invade China, as a Russian ally. Sino-American forces eventually defeated Japan, and it is reformed by China.Have we agreed on Japan yet? I myself am with @KaiserEmu here, but I find that a poll would be most useful.
I am fine with this, with the exception that I would like to work a little more on the rise of the Romanist ideology@mikroraptor , could you leave Italy and Greece and the Albanian areas to me?