Status
Not open for further replies.
Hispania, Hispania!
  • "...the practical distinction between serranista and primista had largely died with the two men behind the Glorious Revolution and instead had come to simply infer a vague description of fluid factions within the dominant National Liberals, with the former generally suggesting the more moderate, conservative wing of the liberal movement and the latter its more progressive inclination, but both claiming to speak for the intellectual bourgeoisie and that class's ideological obligations to the working class. According to who one asked, Canalejas was either the most democratic and reformist of serranistas or a reactionary hiding in the clothes of primismo; as was the case in the sclerotic big tent of the Prime Minister's party, he was of course a bit of both and more, something to everyone, ideologically flexible but committed to suffrage, the peaceful and longstanding political settlement with the Church and democratic constitutional monarchy.

    The progressist inclination of primismo had never gone away fully, however, even with the rise of Serrano in the wake of the wars of the early 1870s and the Count of Reus' own death in 1887 or the political failure of his chief protege, Cristero Martos. Interior Minister Segismundo Moret had been a key cabinet officer in every government since the Revolution save that of Montero Rios, which had influenced his inclusion in government by Canalejas, and was most famous for being the key figure behind the abolition of slavery and the incorporation of the insular Caribbean as autonomous provinces of Spain rather than colonies. As such, he was a figure of profound standing within the National Liberal Party and had genuine progressive and anti-imperialist credentials, and had been one of the few men in his party to support Philippine reforms during the controversy over the matter after the Weyler Memorandum. This was Moret's hour.

    Canalejas, per dispatches from Foreign Minister [Miguel] Villanueva, had stayed on top of developments in Amsterdam even as the Spanish streets came alive in outrage. Anarchist, syndicalist, socialist, nationalist, Carlist, separatist - if there was an oppositionist group to the broad but thin centre of Spanish politics, it was out protesting, rioting or threatening to bring down the regime. Canalejas promulgated a draft plan of constitutional reform to be submitted to the Cortes after the negotiations with the Great Powers was finished and in the meantime unleashed the Guardia Civil and Army, only to find that many gendarmes and soldiers refused to put down the riots this time. Barcelona was effectively lawless, and Valencia, Havana and Cordoba were not far behind. The risk of a putsch as humiliated Spanish soldiers and sailors returned home haggard and well-aware that their government was treating with a Japan that had gleefully beheaded their countrymen for sport [1], and angrily demanded that the government stand firm. "Es necesito que nos muerte por algo!" went the chant - It is necessary that we died for something!

    Canalejas had little choice - he elected to stand firm and telegraphed Villanueva his "reservations" regarding several provisions of the draft treaty, thus prolonging the negotiations and hopefully earning time with the Spanish street. Moret and his cadre of ascendant primista insurgents had seen enough: with internecine warfare within the National Liberals just as bad as the ugly violence now occurring even in Madrid, it was time to act. He presented Canalejas with a letter informing him that as many as ninety members of the party, nearly half the majority in the Cortes, would immediately exit the National Liberal organization and form a coalition government with the Radicals and the regionalists and independent socialists if he did not immediately either accept the provisions of the Amsterdam Treaty as is and at last end the war, or resign as Prime Minister if his honor dictated he could not and allow Moret to take over instead. Canalejas was stunned and insulted, and immediately went to see the King. Leopoldo, tired and exhausted and unwilling to sack an entire Cabinet again, encouraged Canalejas to do whatever he felt "just." The Prince of Asturias - no longer the handsome young cavalry officer who Spanish ladies swooned over but now a middle-aged, pudgy and reactionary Germanophile - had a different suggestion, which was for Canalejas to sack Moret and his instigators from Cabinet, call his bluff on the assumption that "not even half of ninety" would cross the floor and instead rule in a coalition with Maura's Conservatives and Nocedal's Integrists until the matter could be settled at the next election.

    Canalejas may have been a moderate, perhaps even a conservative in a temperamental sense, but he was stunned at the suggestion and by the heir's wading into politics beyond what his father had down a decade prior during the Salmeron Affair. Such a coalition was perfectly permissible under the statutes of Spanish law but Canalejas was old enough and liberal enough to remember the final Carlist conflict and its impact on politics, and he'd be damned if he let Nocedal within even earshot of power as some kind of ad hoc confidence and supply arrangement. Honor demanded neither signing his name to the document that would complete the collapse of the Spanish Empire or allowing the wolves into the flock, but if Moret wanted to knife him, he would have to follow through and knife him and then own whatever consequences came next. Canalejas announced to the Cortes to a mix of cheers and boos that his government could not accept the treaty as "per the voices of the people of Spain" and that negotiations would continue. Moret, it turned out, was not bluffing; he requested a vote of no-confidence as he and half the Cabinet resigned, and Canalejas was defeated on that vote, and Moret would be called reluctantly by Leopoldo to the palace to form a government, for no more crises could be afforded.

    Moret kept Villanueva in his role so as to not interrupt the negotiations but commanded him to accept the French compromise, and the Treaty of Amsterdam passed the Cortes of Spain by a margin of two votes; its failure would have triggered an even greater crisis than that of its passage. Moret now entirely owned what a large segment of the Spanish public viewed as a betrayal and a substantial majority saw as a national humiliation, and his takedown of Canalejas after only four months only further destabilized the previously placid Spanish politics and deepened his unpopularity with National Liberal supporters even though he had retained the confidence of half the party's caucus..." [2]

    - Hispania, Hispania!

    [1] Exaggeration and the Spanish walked into it with their butchery in the islands but this is the live perspective on the Spanish street
    [2] So for those keeping track at home, the serranistas have basically collapsed thanks to getting into the war with Japan and now the primistas have made it worse by accepting the shit deal for Spain that the Treaty of Amsterdam represents, even though practically there was no way for them to keep the Philippines at all. Of course, geopolitical nuance is often lost on angry rioters!
     
    The Bear Looks East
  • "...much as Mukden, Yingkow and Harbin began to look and sound like Russian cities with the massive flow of capital and personnel to Manchuria with the near-completed railroad, Russification was a delicate matter with clear limitations on its efficacy as the example of Finland in June of 1904 demonstrated. The Finnish constitution had been gradually curtailed under the 1890s and its legal code, educational and political systems increasingly brought into alignment with those of Russia, erasing a number of distinctions between the Grand Duchy and the Motherland. This had, unsurprisingly, not gone over well with Finns who had been amicably oriented towards St. Petersburg otherwise and indeed one of the least restive corners of the Empire thanks to the generous terms of the personal union. By 1904, Helsinki had become a tinderbox as liberal Finns turned to nationalism and the working class to socialism, both trends embodied in the Young Finns movement and the mass riots in the 1904 Finnish Revolution - which, of course, failed under the boots of Russian soldiers - triggered by the assassination of deeply unpopular and autocratic Governor-General Nikolay Bobrikov while leaving the Finnish Senate..."

    - The Bear Looks East
     
    The African Game: The European Contest for the Dark Continent
  • "...for all their rivalries perhaps the Germans looked to the Belgians as inspiration; using similarly bloodthirsty tactics as they had deployed in China during the Boxer War and would soon rediscover the utility of as they crushed the Moro rebels of their new East Indian colony, the Germans beginning in the summer of 1904 engaged in the practice of shooting Herero (what they called "hottentots") males in Southwest Africa upon sight and driving the women and children into the desert to put down a rebellion and make clear the order of things in one of their sole African territories. Overshadowed by the savagery of the Congo, the Herero Genocide killed nearly 90% of the indigenous population in a horrific campaign of ethnic cleansing never formally sanctioned by Berlin but widely tolerated and never properly condemned..."

    - The African Game: The European Contest for the Dark Continent
     
    The Hamidian Era: The Ottoman Empire 1876-1914
  • "...the last decade of Abdulhamid's life was marked by an increase in repression and paranoia; his competing spy agencies and networks took turns escalating their activities against legal liberal, secular and soft-nationalist political parties and the Senate became full of his cronies rather than statesmen or elder clergy as had been intended. The most infamous episode, in late 1904, was his decision to sack a third of the Navy's officers and ban all naval reviews in Constantinople, out of a terrible fear that the Ottoman Navy was plotting to overthrow the Sultanate, or at least install one of his relatives, and that fleet days were the excuse to do so. The quality of Naval officers declined dramatically afterwards, in tandem with their budget for newer and more modern ships..."

    - The Hamidian Era: The Ottoman Empire 1876-1914
     
    Beyond Bondage
  • "...it was not just plantations in the Confederacy that Harry C. Smith began to identify the American owners of in his Cincinnati Gazette, but also investors in textile and sugar mills, tobacco factories, fruit packing warehouses, anything that slavery could potentially touch. Big names of course predictably appeared - Morgan, Baker, Vanderbilt, Carnegie, Mellon - but the "name to shame" push by the Boycotters was broader than that. Over the past forty years, the United States had viewed the Confederacy often as a minor geopolitical rival in the Caribbean but primarily a potential trade partner and market for finished goods; relations were occasionally strained but had never been genuinely hostile, at least not from north of the Ohio. Even supporters of abolition and political benefactors of Smith such as Joseph Foraker had effectively made peace with slavery's containment in the Confederacy even as they advocated what WEB DuBois dismissed as "liberty in theory, so long as nothing need be done about it."

    That was why high society types were targeted in the campaign, too. The late President Hay's daughter, Helen Hay Whitney, was a particular object of scorn by Boycotters for her husband's plantation in North Carolina (which he was adamant held no men or women in bondage, but the implication and embarrassment was enough). The Whitney affair made plain what the Boycotters eventual aim was - to destroy slave power by cutting the economic ties from the United States that sustained the extractive economy built on the backs of chattel first and then expand to across the Atlantic, where a similar grassroots movement was starting to bubble up in Britain, to so starve the Confederacy of capital that it would eventually have to choose pariah status and economic collapse or do away with slavery through means constitutional or otherwise once and for all..."

    - Beyond Bondage
     
    The Arson of Austria: Understanding Central Europe's Conflagration
  • "...the coalition of anti-Imperialists that won the Hungarian elections of 1904 did so under a severely restricted franchise - barely a quarter of Hungarian men were eligible to vote under one of Europe's most restrictive property qualifications - and still rejected the pro-Viennese government of Tisza Istvan in a landslide. The oppositionists who came to power were an eclectic bunch, with the largest grouping outright separatist nationalists but now having to find a way to govern the Transleithnian half of the Empire with right-wing clericalists of the Christian Social Party, liberal dissidents under the Constitution Party, and a number of other minor factions. It was not a government that promised stability and focus.

    Nevertheless, the mood in Vienna at the Schonbrunn was one of outright panic. Franz Ferdinand in particular advocated for "direct rule" - that unless the autocratic and aristocratic Liberal Party was restored immediately, the Emperor should rule by fiat in Hungary. Franz Josef was baffled at the suggestion but refused to let the Kossuthites have the reins of power, and instead identified pro-Compromise but anti-Tisza liberals as the most logical choice, calling Szell Kalman, a former Prime Minister who had mollified Hungarian passions in the aftermath of the double murder of Rudolf and Stephanie, to head a compromise Cabinet [1].

    Szell's priority was building a Cabinet that could function with the very different views on government, policy and even the position of Hungary within the Dual Monarchy, but he had previously secured an Ausgleich renewal through 1907 and in the eyes of the establishment, could do so again. Nevertheless, the results of 1904 suggested that Hungary was much, much more complicated on the ground than thought..."

    - The Arson of Austria: Understanding Central Europe's Conflagration

    [1] Franz Josef was not this deliberate in OTL and appointed a military loyalist over the heads of the Hungarian Parliament. Here he's a bit more clever, though the Constitutionalists are still not the dominant Coalition partner. Szell is the choice rather than Werkele Sandor, but the effect is the same - anti-Tisza, ex-Liberal PM brought back as a compromise choice

    (I want to thank @Fehérvári for letting me pick his brain for info regarding Hungary specifically and the Habsburg monarchy generally during this time period and for turning me onto the 1905-10 Hungarian political crisis/debacle)
     
    The Radical Republic
  • "...Leandro Alem's return to the Presidency for a second time came concomitantly with a law foreclosing any successor from doing so; shortly after his inauguration in September of 1904 the Civic Union-dominated Congress passed a constitutional provision that limited all future Presidents to a single lifetime term, still of six years, much like the Confederate States of America and Chile (five rather than six). The new law was ostensibly passed out of concern of Julio Roca or another conservative National Autonomist coming to power and establishing a personalist dictatorship, but the fact that Alem was returning for another six years as the dominant force in the UC was surely a factor.

    But Alem had supported the law, and under his second Presidency, one held under considerably more political stability than his first, many of the accomplishments for which he is most celebrated were achieved. The radical republic's universal manhood suffrage, liberal electoral system and progressive constitution had made it a model and leading light to the United States and Britain in South America, a position she eagerly took advantage of and Alem basked in the prestige he had internationally as one of the world's liberal champions. It was thanks to this place of admiration that his foreign minister, Luis Drago, was able to articulate a doctrine that no sovereign nation should be invaded or occupied to pay a sovereign debt to private banks, and seeing the United States tacitly condone the stance; this already on its own marked a major shift from the geopolitics of the 19th century.

    Argentina also had perhaps the world's highest levels of immigration during the second half of the 1900s decade, particularly from Spain, Italy and Greece, due both to the booming agricultural and industrial sectors but also in part to Alem's completion of Irigoyen's [1] promulgation of the Americas' first Code of Labor - a compendium of laws [2] codifying various labor rights. The first six Instruments of the Code were expanded upon with four more, these guaranteeing the right to strike, mandating minimum pay laws (the first of their kind in the world for a national polity), creating a government commission to regulate and certify union elections, and formalizing the structure of work councils by establishing the right of union members to serve in management and for employers to appoint at least a quarter of the members of a union's governing council. They were the most robust worker protections anywhere on Earth, and had been passed not by socialists but by middle class reformers and liberals, suggesting a path for a future in which organized labor and liberalism could coexist as equal partners to combat oligarchy.

    Alem's program of bold but unconfrontational reformism continued with his expansion of military academies for the positivist and thoroughly democratized Army and Navy, both of which had by the mid-1900s accepted total depolarization and civilian control [3] and enjoyed prestige and popularity with the populace, but the real core of Argentina's economic export boom was his banking reform, in which laws were passed allowing cheap, long-term loans not only for industry - financed by Banco Britanico or Banco Londres, both British institutions - but indigenous banks such as Banco Nacion or Banco Hipotecario, which began financing 20-year mortgages at low interest rates. This banking-led boom, a mere decade and a half after the disastrous Barings panic, led to a surge in home and land ownership by "smallholders" and created a wealthy middle class in Buenos Aires and elsewhere in the commercial cities of the Rio de la Plata and Pampas.

    Of course, the unprecedented windfall of prosperity that made Argentina the fastest growing economy in the world was not equal. Alem, in 1906, would describe the Argentine nation as "increasingly bifurcated," as the modern and prosperous Platine and Pampas regions had standards of living comparable to the United States and much of Western Europe, while regions on the extremity such as the northwest and south were still poor backwaters with tremendously rough livelihoods..."

    - The Radical Republic

    [1] Bernardo, not Hipolito (who's last name was spelt Yrigoyen)
    [2] This may not come across super cleanly in the text, but stylistically I'm trying to write this as if it was translated from Spanish to English
    [3] This may sound overly utopian for South America but per many of @minifidel posts regarding Argentina at this time, it actually was the case
     
    1904 United States elections
  • 1904 United States elections

    1904 United States Presidential election

    William R. Hearst of New York/Thomas L. Johnson of Ohio (Democratic) - 55.6% Popular Vote, 355 EVs

    New York - 56
    Illinois - 36
    Ohio - 32
    Missouri - 24
    Indiana - 20
    Michigan - 20
    Iowa - 18
    California - 18
    Wisconsin - 17
    New Jersey - 17
    Minnesota - 15
    Kansas -13
    Maryland - 11
    Nebraska -10
    West Virginia - 9
    Dakota - 7
    Colorado - 6
    Washington - 6
    Oregon - 5
    Montana - 4
    New Mexico - 4
    Delaware - 4
    Nevada - 3

    Charles Fairbanks of Indiana/Benjamin Odell of New York (Liberal) - 38.1% Popular Vote, 101 EVs

    Pennsylvania - 47
    Massachusetts - 22
    Connecticut - 9
    Maine - 8
    Rhode Island - 5
    New Hampshire - 5
    Vermont - 5

    Eugene Debs of Indiana/Benjamin Hanford of New York (Socialist) - 3.8% Popular Vote, 0 EVs

    1904 United States Senate elections

    Though Democrats build off of the landslide of 1902 and the commensurate pasting of Charles Fairbanks in 1904, the successes of previous cycles have in many ways already manifested and their gains in the Senate are somewhat limited, merely maxing out their near-term potential and even losing Delaware over yet another case of bribery and chicanery in that state's legislature that sees George Gray, once thought of as a future President, ousted for corrupt industrialist J. Edward Addicks. The story of the autumn, though, is the generational and ideological shift in the caucus that sees it become even younger and more progressive, as old-school conservatives like Cockrell and Sprigg are defeated or step aside for rising stars and sticks in the mud like Bliss are bounced for Hearst's favorite fixer, Edward Murphy, with the promise of a lucrative Cabinet job [1]. The most important thing? The Democratic Senate in the 59th Congress will have 41 out of 60 seats, giving them a true, veto-proof supermajority. Among the Liberal turnover, Danzell's progressivism is punished with the elevation of outgoing AG Knox to the Senate as one of the few major events of note.

    CA: Stephen Mallory White (Democrat) Died in Office 1903; Theodore Arlington Bell (Democrat) ELECTED
    CT: Joseph Roswell Hawley (Liberal) Retired; Morgan Bulkeley (Liberal) ELECTED
    DE: Georgy Gray (Democrat) Retired; J. Edward Addicks (Liberal) ELECTED (L+1)
    IN: Charles Fairbanks (Liberal) Retired; Benjamin Shively (Democrat) ELECTED (D+1)
    ME: Eugene Hale (Liberal) Re-Elected
    MD: William Pinkney Whyte (Democrat) Re-Elected
    MA: Henry Cabot Lodge (Liberal) Re-Elected [2]
    MI: Woodbridge Nathan Ferris (Democrat) Re-Elected [3]
    MN: Charles A. Towne (Democrat) Re-Elected
    MO: Francis Cockrell (Democrat) DEFEATED for Renomination; James A. Reed (Democrat) ELECTED
    NE: William V. Allen (Democrat) Retired; Richard Lee Metcalfe (Democrat) ELECTED
    NV: William Morris Stewart (Democrat) Re-Elected
    NJ: William McAdoo (Democratic) Re-Elected
    NM: Antonio Joseph (Democrat) Re-Elected
    NY: Archibald Bliss (Democrat) Retired; Edward Murphy (Democrat) ELECTED
    OH: Asa Bushnell (Liberal) Died in Office; John Lentz (Democrat) Appointed and Elected to Full Term (D+2)
    PA: John Danzell (Liberal) DEFEATED for Re-Nomination; Philander Knox (Liberal) ELECTED
    RI: William Sprague (Liberal) Re-Elected
    VT: Redfield Proctor (Liberal) Re-Elected
    WV: Joseph Sprigg (Democrat) Retired; Thomas S. Riley (Democrat) ELECTED
    WI: Joseph W. Babcock (Liberal) DEFEATED; James William Murphy (Democrat) ELECTED (D+3)

    1904 United States House elections

    Democrats build on their landslide from two years earlier and despite the economic depression find that they are getting close to maxing out their gains; nonetheless, House Democrats under the Sulzer speakership also earn a supermajority by defeating 25 Liberals (including Minority Whip James Tawney of southeastern Minnesota) and nearly ousting another dozen where they lost by narrow margins (including just barely losing to Minority Leader Sereno Payne in upstate New York, in what could have been two consecutive cycles of defeating the Liberal House leader). Socialists manage to defeat a single New York Democrat to double their House representation from 1 to 2 but remain largely irrelevant both nationally and in the House. Ending up with 284 Representatives, the Democrats have the largest House caucus in the history of the Republic and the first House supermajority in decades.

    59th United States Congress

    Senate: 41D-19L

    President of the Senate: Tom Johnson (D-OH)
    Senate President pro tempore:
    Chairman of Senate Liberal Conference: William Frye (L-ME)
    Chairman of Senate Democratic Conference: William McAdoo (D-NJ)

    California
    1. Theodore Arlington Bell (D) (1903)
    3. James D. Phelan (D) (1903)

    Colorado

    2. Thomas M. Patterson (D) (1901)
    3. James Bradley Orman (D) (1903)

    Connecticut
    1. Morgan Bulkeley (L) (1905)
    3. Orville Platt (L) (1879)

    Dakota

    2. Fountain Thompson (D) (1901)
    3. Richard Pettigrew (D) (1903)

    Delaware
    1. J. Edward Addicks (L) (1905)
    2. Richard R. Kenny (D) (1901)

    Illinois
    2. Shelby Moore Cullom (L) (1881)
    3. Andrew J. Hunter (D) (1903)

    Indiana
    1. Benjamin Shively (D) (1905)
    3. John W. Kern (D) (1903)

    Iowa
    2. Horace Boies (D) (1895)
    3. James B. Weaver (D) (1891)

    Kansas
    2. William A. Peffer (D) (1895)
    3. William Harris (D) (1897)

    Maine
    1. Eugene Hale (L) (1881)
    2. William P. Frye (L) (1881)

    Maryland
    1. William Pinkney Whyte (D) (1869)
    3. Isidor Rayner (D) (1903)

    Massachusetts
    1. Henry Cabot Lodge (L) (1893)
    2. William Moody (L) (1901)

    Michigan
    1. Woodbridge Nathan Ferris (D) (1902)
    2. Julius Caesar Burrows (L) (1895)

    Minnesota
    1. Charles A. Towne (D) (1893)
    2. Knute Nelson (D) (1901)

    Missouri
    1. James A. Reed (D) (1905)
    3. James T. Lloyd (D) (1903-)

    Montana

    2. Paris Gibson (D) (1901)
    3. Joseph Toole (D) (1892)

    Nebraska
    1. Richard Lee Metcalfe (D) (1905)
    2. William J. Bryan (D) (1895)

    Nevada
    1. William Morris Stewart (D) (1895)
    3. Francis Newlands (D) (1903)

    New Hampshire
    2. William Chandler (L) (1889)
    3. Henry Blair (L) (1873)

    New Jersey
    1. William McAdoo (D) (1887)
    2. James Smith Jr. (D) (1895)

    New Mexico

    1. Antonio Joseph (D) (1887)
    2. Octaviano Larrazola (D) (1901)

    New York
    1. Edward Murphy Jr. (D) (1905)
    3. George McClellan Jr. (D) (1903)

    Ohio
    1. John Lentz (D) (1904)
    3. James R. Garfield (L) (1903)

    Oregon
    2. John M. Gearin (D) (1901)
    3. George Earle Chamberlain (D) (1903)

    Pennsylvania
    1. Philander Knox (L) (1905)
    3. Boies Penrose (L) (1897)

    Rhode Island
    1. William Sprague (L) (1863)
    2. George Wetmore (L) (1895)

    Vermont
    1. Redfield Procter (L) (1881)
    3. William P. Dillingham (L) (1897)

    Washington

    2. George Turner (D) (1889)
    3. Eugene Semple (D) (1888)

    West Virginia
    1. Thomas S. Riley (D) (1905)
    2. John J. Davis (D) (1893)

    Wisconsin
    1. James William Murphy (D) (1905)
    3. Robert La Follette (L) (1903)

    House: 284D-109L-2S 395 seats

    House Liberal Caucus Chair: Sereno Payne (L-NY)
    House Minority Leader: Frederick Gillett (L-MA)
    House Minority Whip: James Mann (L-IL)

    Speaker of the House: William Sulzer (D-NY)
    House Democratic Caucus Chair: Dennis Donovan (D-OH)
    House Majority Leader: Champ Clark (D-MO)
    House Majority Whip: Marion De Vries (D-CA)

    [1] Again - inspired by Mark Hanna
    [2] Unfortunately, because fuck this guy
    [3] As always, "coolest name" wins the day when I'm picking future Senators. Theodore Arlington Bell thus narrowly beat out California Governor Franklin Lane Knight
     
    Citizen Hearst
  • "...the returns revealed a Liberal Party that had no answers for most of the country and was now under siege even in its New England redoubt, with Democrats winning gubernatorial elections in Massachusetts and Connecticut, too. In both Houses of Congress, Democrats had nearly seven out of ten seats, they were tied for or outright controlled at least one house of every state legislature outside of New England, and the mayors of the twenty largest cities in the country all hailed from the party. Hearst would, in other words, be entering office with supermajorities not just in Congress but most of the states; the last time Democrats had even come close to this kind of power was in the midst of the Republican-Liberal split of the 1870s. 1904 was one of the great realigning elections of American history, with Democrats poised to utterly reshape the country's political system and with the swell of progressive reformist energy at their back made the United States one of the few countries in the world during the first decades of the 20th century to not turn from liberalism back to reactionary conservatism but rather supercharge the modernizing ethos to be what Hearst hoped would be an inspiration for the world..."

    - Citizen Hearst
     
    wikipedia.en - Joseph B. Foraker
  • Joseph Benson Foraker (July 5, 1846 - May 10, 1917) was an American attorney and statesman who served as the 26th President of the United States, the 22nd Vice President of the United States and as the Governor of Ohio. Foraker was elected on two Liberal presidential tickets as the running mate of John Hay, whom he succeeded as President on November 1, 1898 upon the latter's assassination in Omaha, Nebraska. Foraker was the fifth man to succeed to the presidency under the extraordinary circumstances of the death of an incumbent and the third in eleven years, and was the first man to succeed to the Presidency upon the death of his predecessor and then win a term of his own right.

    Foraker developed a reputation in his three terms as Ohio Governor as a bold reformer of both public administration and local government and emerged as the leader of the Liberal Party's reform wing and a potential Presidential contender in both 1888 and 1892. In the latter year, he fell short again of the nomination but was surprisingly picked as the running mate for Hay, to whom he became a key confidant and emerged as the most influential Vice President in history up until that point, spearheading the administration's relationship with Congress and making key personnel decisions in the civil service in a time when his office had traditionally been fairly weak. Foraker was inaugurated on November 1, 1898 in Washington DC upon receiving news of Hay's death, four days after the President had been shot at the Omaha Exposition by anarchist Gaetano Bresci.

    As President, Foraker oversaw a tumultuous time period in American history as labor activism and the Progressive Movement emerged and politics largely passed him by, leaving him with the reputation of a "stand-pat" conservative by the end of his Presidency. The first Liberal to face a fully Democratic Congress, his primary domestic accomplishments were the passage of the Bushnell Act to regulate railroads, formally desegregating the military, placing vast federal lands into conservation and the appointment of three Supreme Court Justices (Goff, Holmes and Morrow) who would in time uphold a great deal of Progressive and economically interventionist legislation and set the standard moving forward of judicial restraint in approaching the review of most acts of Congress. In foreign affairs, Foraker presided over the American response to the Boxer War in China, establishing the American Expeditionary Force, and signed the Naval Act of 1904 that was the most dramatic expansion of the United States Navy since the early 1880s; he also completed the longstanding project of securing the Nicaragua Canal often associated with his predecessor, seeing Congress pass the Canal Treaty in early 1901. During his early tenure the economy rebounded from the brief 1898 recession but by the early part of his first term had begun to stagnate despite an unprecedented bubble in equity prices and amalgamations of trusts and monopolies unchecked by the Justice Department; ten months before the end of his Presidency, the stock market collapsed in the Panic of 1904, one of the worst financial panics in American history, and he left office deeply unpopular.

    Historians often rank Foraker in the bottom tier of American Presidents, and his Presidency is largely viewed as the conclusion of the Gilded Age and beginning of the Progressive Era. While he is praised for desegregating the military and steadfastly defending the civil rights of Americans, his pro-business outlook and reluctance to go after trusts are generally laid at his feet as being partly responsible for economic calamity.

    1642713834035.png
     
    Destiny Beckons: Rise of the German Reich
  • "...continental worries about Germany's economic emergence can be distilled instructively in cases such as that of the Dreibund, or the formal alliance of BASF, Bayer and Agfa joining forces to create the worst's largest chemical concern under the new name "IG Farben" [1]. Already the first, second and fourth biggest firms in that industry in Germany, the new company sent shockwaves of worry through Europe and even the United States, where its formation in December of 1904 led to debate about whether tariffs would need to be raised to protect against German domination of the robust domestic chemical market. Amalgamation was of course nothing new; American politics at the time was dominated by fear of massive trusts and in Britain the United Alkali Company had been forged out of the merger of nearly fifty smaller firms joining forces. Still, IG seemed a different animal, considering Germany's increasingly premier position in the chemicals and dyes industry and even its domestic competitors feared its power, with Hoechst and Casella joining forces less than six months later and snapping up controlling stakes in smaller, Frankfurt-area companies to create a necessary duopoly purely for survival..."

    - Destiny Beckons: Rise of the German Reich

    [1] This is OTL's original "Little IG"
     
    The German on the Spanish Throne: The Reign of Leopold I
  • "...the death of Prince Friedrich of Hohenzollern in Munich greatly saddened Leopold, already sensing that he was in the final months or perhaps even weeks of his life, dismayed that his younger brother had predeceased him. Friedrich and his wife, Louise, had not had issue and so the successor would be Infante Carlos Antonio, who of course would return to the family estate at Sigmaringen to take his original, German name of Karl Anton upon arrival, but refused to leave Madrid for his new (minor) title until his father had either passed or recovered. This choice only made the palace gloomier; Leopold complained to his eldest son, "It feels like I am but a wounded beast watching the vultures circle, waiting for me to die. God, just take me already!"..."

    - The German on the Spanish Throne: The Reign of Leopold I
     
    Rizal
  • "...clinical work was at an end, for all his comforts in Havana, though the rising contempt for Asians in the city in the wake of the war, Filipinos in particular, made the choice easier than it may have been otherwise. Rizal imagined that, having already been away in Madrid for his education, returning to the Philippines after nearly a decade would be similar, but it was not just he who had changed in the intervening time, and the islands of his youth were more a foreign country to him upon his arrival (after a long journey and forty-day sojourn in Hong Kong) than they would otherwise have seemed after eight years.

    The Philippine Revolution that had erupted in part due to his exile in the summer of 1896 and then morphed seven years later into the Spanish-Japanese War had effectively destroyed the island physically, economically but most of all psychologically and socially. Estimates on the total death count were difficult to accumulate at the time and even in the modern Philippines are a source of tremendous controversy and a politically sensitive subject. A rough but likely undercounted census was conducted in 1898 at the height of the rebellion that suggested a population of nearly eight million; six years later, when the Republic did the same, the number was a bit under seven. With the important caveat that the islands were not fully under Manila's control in the immediate wake of the Treaty of Amsterdam and the 1904 census was even more certainly undercounted, this still suggests a population decline of at least a tenth of the Philippines' population, likely much more, despite births and new families in the intervening years. Modern estimates suggest anywhere between nine hundred thousand to a million and a half Filipinos were killed either intentionally or by starvation and disease during the revolution. Spain, of course, has disputed these figures for decades and has never acknowledged even the most conservative numbers that died in reconcentrados alone.

    Those that survived lived in a dangerous, half-lawless society that oscillated between attempted domination by nearby European colonial powers, warlordism and revolutionary zeal [1]. Bonifacio and his inner circle of Katipunan rebels had drafted and implemented a centralist constitution at Tarlac as the Japanese marched upon Manila that vested most of the new state's authority in the National Assembly and in particular its hybrid executive-legislative upper house, the Supreme Council, which was appointed by the National Assembly and which itself appointed one of its fifteen members to serve as its President, or Supremo. That role fell naturally to Bonifacio, the hero of the Revolution, and the Assembly was effectively not so much an organ of the state as of the Katipunan, a distinction perhaps without a difference.

    This Supreme Council rapidly had fallen into disarray by the time Rizal arrived, however, with arguments over whether the government should conduct business in Tagalog (spoken primarily only by the people of central Luzon) or in Spanish as a lingua franca and even what the name of the country should be. This brand of angry revolutionary iconoclasm had spread across the islands as the rebel armies were disbanded and hundreds of thousands of hungry, radicalized and hardened young men returned to their villages. As the Spanish fled, Bonifacio seized the haciendas and the missions of the hated friars and began the rough attempt to disperse all that land amongst the people, a task so difficult the Council eventually overruled his initial plan and left the allotment of land to local authorities (read: bandits and warlords). Though Catholicism was constitutionally enshrined as the state religion, all monastic and religious orders - including the Jesuits - were banned and their members to be expelled on penalty of death, with their assets to be seized and transferred to the Archdiocese of Manila instead. What few of the hated friars had not evacuated the Philippines already, many out of stubbornness, were hunted down and murdered, often after public torture and humiliation. Village fiefdoms exerted extrajudicial authority and by late 1905 it appeared to Rizal that Manila had about as much control of the countryside as the Spaniards had had at the height of the rebellion..." [2]

    - Rizal

    [1] This is that "Year One" culture war stuff @President Earl Warren and I were discussing the other day...
    [2] If you're thinking "Hey now this sounds just like the post-colonial Spanish American colonies that got taken over by caudillismo then yes, 100%, that's exactly what it's supposed to sound like
     
    A New King for a New Britain: The Life and Long Reign of George V
  • "...the need for more space eventually landed on a suggestion pushed aggressively by Chamberlain, the gargantuan Monumental Hall with a soaring tower [1] that would rise a hundred and forty meters above Westminster, dwarfing everything in the proximity but stealing the thunder of St. Paul's back for the Westminster Cathedral. George was personally initially quite skeptical but private foundations wound up meeting much of the remarkable cost and the grand structure, which would be fully completed in 1920, wound up being one of his great legacies, though for years it was the butt of jokes regarding the larger-than-life Prime Minister who had been its greatest partisan - that the monuments it needed to be so large to fit were Chamberlain's ego, or phallic remarks, such as "Old Joe wanting to leave the Palace of Westminster in the shadow of his cock even after he was dead...""

    - A New King for a New Britain: The Life and Long Reign of George V [2]

    [1] This monstrosity, also known as the Seddon Proposal. Here it's slightly shorter than the OTL proposal which of course never happened (it was ruinously expensive and completely out of character with that part of London) but with a powerful egomaniac like Chamberlain pushing it, I could see it happening. Also, alt-architecture is kinda fun :p
    [2] Considering the remarkable similarity in title to the textbook about Tsar Michael II of Russia, chalk this one up to either A) the same publisher or B) me being very lazy
     
    The Arson of Austria: Understanding Central Europe's Conflagration
  • "...shortly before Christmas, and her illness only steadily grew worse. Finally, on January 22, 1905, Sisi passed away at the Schonbrunn, Franz Josef's hand in hers as he sat at the bedside, an unusually intimate and ordinary end to their otherwise unconventional and tumultuous marriage. His strange love for her did not extend far enough that he could honor the dying request in her testament and even on her lips as she passed, though: "I want a funeral in Budapest."

    Sisi had always preferred the Hungarian half of the realm and been its greatest partisan at Court. The culture, the people, the city where her equally Magyarphile son had been murdered, that was the part of the Dual Monarchy where she had felt at home. The old Emperor pondered her request for two days in agony; what was the downside in holding the funeral mass in St. Stephen's, anyways?

    Franz Ferdinand was firm in his advice not to, however, and for once Franz Josef took his nephew's advice. A funeral for the Empress at one of Catholicism's two seats in Hungary less than a year after the anti-Viennese parties had captured the state organs of Transleithnia would only serve as a propaganda platform for parties opposed to the current Habsburg settlement. No, though the Crown of St. Stephen was one of two the Emperor wore, there were Hungarian events that warranted such imperial pomp in Budapest but Vienna was the ancestral home of the House of Habsburg and Elisabeth should be buried there accordingly. The Emperor conceded after considerably pressure by other centralists in Court, and the Empress's funeral was scheduled for early February, one of the most lavish in the history of the Empire.

    To say the least, this stance was not popular in Budapest, where Sisi had been adored by the public and her son had been genuinely mourned after his shock assassination six and a half years earlier. Even Liberal politicians, generally deferential to Vienna, complained that "Hungary will be unable to properly bid adieu to this admired Empress on our own soil." Erzsi was particularly apoplectic; though not particularly close to her eccentric grandmother the one thing they had shared was their love of Hungary and in the Empress's will she had received much of her personal property (that which wasn't bequeathed to various religious orders). The snub was the last straw for her in her alienation from Court and her eventual renunciation of her place in the Habsburg family and indeed in high nobility in Europe; her commitment from here on out was to herself and to her beloved Hungary..."

    - The Arson of Austria: Understanding Central Europe's Conflagration

    (THanks to @suburbanbeatnik for some of the Erzsi ideas!)
     
    Last edited:
    Shadow Wars: A History of Espionage and Counterintelligence
  • "...borders in the Balkans were strange things, though; there, truly, they were merely lines on a map, and even the hodgepodge of linguistic communities for which the complex region is famous was more fluid than meets the eye. There were many who were not merely a Greek or Albanian, nor merely a Turk or Bulgarian, but a bit of both, with a partial command of both languages, with no firm identity beyond residency in their village. The mountainous southeast of Europe's fluidity was economic, too; Serbs regularly migrated south into Nish and Sofya to work throughout the summer before returning home, traveling merchants roamed the valleys like they had since medieval times, and banditry knew no borders, nor did the mercenaries and posses assembled - like something out of the American Old West - to catch them.

    This status quo was not uneasy but rather quite simple to those who lived within it, a normal they took for granted, and fertile soil for powers around to easily pay spies and intrigue across borders..."

    - Shadow Wars: A History of Espionage and Counterintelligence
     
    Pitchforks, Peasants and Palmetto Politics: The Rise and Fall of Benjamin Tillman
  • "...even less important than its Union counterpart (with fewer states the Confederate Senate was of course much smaller and thus even more driven by its individual personalities and state interests) but the practice had long been that Vice Presidents, as a "reward" for their serving six years in a powerless, meaningless job, were often granted some sinecure after the inauguration of their successor. In the case of Longstreet's ticket mate Augustus Garland it had been a seat on the Supreme Court; for Joseph Blackburn, it had been consistent appointments to the Cabinet, as Secretary of the Treasury and now Secretary of State; and for William Bate, it was to return to the Senate seat he had held for over two decades after a single-term interregnum by Henry Snodgrass, who was purely a seat warmer for Bate's return in early 1904. [1]

    Of course, Bate had been quite elderly already upon his elevation to the Vice Presidency and his return to the Senate had come with eyebrows raised and questions about his potential longevity, especially as he quietly slid into an additional sinecure in the position of Senate President Pro Tem that had been held most of his previous tenure by the imperious [Wade] Hampton. No Senator since Hampton's retirement had held the office for even an entire Congress, either through death or maneuvering in "the world's most eloquent viper pit," and Bate was no different, dying on March 9, 1905 on his way back from serving in the Confederate delegation to the inauguration festivities of William Hearst in Washington.

    Bate's death took nobody in Richmond by surprise, certainly not Pitchfork Ben. Since it became clear two years earlier that too many within the populist wing of the Democratic Party had their knives out for the movement's putative leader and would partner with the Bourbons to destroy him, Tillman had begun identifying a different and perhaps cleaner way to exercise power - to become the next Hampton, who had for twelve years held considerably more power than any President by virtue of maintaining an iron grip over the Senate and concomitantly the machinery of the party itself.

    Tillman was greatly assisted in his quest for the ring by the debacle in Tennessee that followed Bate's death. Snodgrass [2] was not reappointed, instead denied a return to the Senate by a plot by the incumbent Tillmanite governor James Frazier to take the seat for himself in a deal cut with the Speaker of the Tennessee House (who would succeed him), John Cox, to appoint him immediately upon resignation. The "Tennessee Two-Step" replaced a moderate Bourbon in Bate (whom Frazier and Cox had had to be cajoled [3] with considerable deference on patronage to reappoint in the first place) with a reformist Pitchforker and, critically, gave the Tillmanites what they had lacked for years - a working majority in the Confederate States Senate. Even Vardaman fell in line to prevent the Bourbon faction from continuing to hold power and with that, Tillman had recovered from his political nadir to become quite possibly the most powerful man in the Confederacy. Almost as soon as he was in office, he began to box out Vice President Tyler (who had previously tried to bully the Senate as its typical presiding officer) and trained his attention on fomenting discontent towards two major Cabinet officers of the "Kentucky cabal" - Treasury Secretary John Carlisle and Secretary of State Blackburn, both former Senators and the new leaders of the Bourbon faction within the Jones administration - to divide the Cabinet into competing camps and make his mark on Richmond from the Senate. Patronage, appointments, legislation - everything now flowed through Pitchfork Ben.

    The Tillmanite consolidation, far from having ended with Jones' compromise nomination, had only just begun..."

    [1] The textbook doesn't need to cover this, but Roger Q. Mills doesn't get a soft landing by the old boys club thanks to his antics in Texas and everyone hating him
    [2] What a great, stereotypically Southern name
    [3] This being the South lets call this a polite aphorism for "bribed"
     
    Day of the Rising Sun
  • "...the Japanese public's reaction to the Triple Intervention and the follow-on Treaty of Amsterdam was one of outrage, and the political class was no less riven by discord. Riots became common, as did increasingly heated calls to violence; radicalization emerged as the norm of general discourse for the growing middle class left stunned by what they viewed, not incorrectly, as three European powers colluding to jump into the war when it was lost for Spain, rather than at the beginning when such a thing would have been honorable, purely to kneecap Japanese ambitions and deny them the prestige colonies they themselves not only enjoyed but felt entitled to in the Far East.

    Within the higher echelons of Japanese society and government, there was no diversity in thought regarding the West - uniformly opposed - but there were open debates about how the new swell in anti-foreign opinion that reminded some of the Boxers in China was best navigated. Yamagata was still a fierce hawk, endorsing a long-range plan to continue building up the Japanese Navy (despite the war with Spain coming close to bankrupting the Empire) so that eventually it could drive its enemies from Asia entirely. Ito had a more circumspect idea, that being to leverage Japan's credentials in Korea and China (Japan had, after all, defeated a European power head to head) and pursue better relations with powers untainted by Amsterdam (such as Russia and the United States) to build a bloc that could box out her chief enemies, particularly France and Britain. Ito's view also relied on Japan being the most prestigious outside power in the Philippines, where Bonifacio's government regarded itself as in its debt. With the long view, Japan would emerge the chief power of the East, that much was settled - the only question now was how..."

    - Day of the Rising Sun
     
    Citizen Hearst
  • "...meeting at the Knickerbocker between Murphy and Hearst where the wily state party chairman was to be rewarded for his securing of the nomination and, thus, the Presidency. Murphy was given the choice of a Senate seat or serving as Secretary of State, with the understanding being that the choice would affect which of those two offices fell instead to incumbent Senator Archibald Bliss, a longstanding New York Democratic statesman whom Murphy categorized as "unreliable" on a whole host of issues that would be important in the Congress ahead. Murphy thus elected to request the Senate seat for himself in order to serve as Hearst's man in the upper house and thus Bliss was offered the end-of-career appointment as America's chief diplomat, a job in time it would become clear he could manage in an age of peace but was unsuited for as the storm clouds of crisis loomed on the horizon.

    The machinations to build the rest of his Cabinet out were not nearly so complicated. Hearst had already eyed George Gray even before the elections as his choice for Attorney General, and the legislative skullduggery that led to Gray's loss of his Delaware Senate seat made the legal eminence available for a new job quite unexpectedly. As Treasury Secretary he settled on Cincinnati businessman and newspaperman John McLean, who had reluctantly served as Richard Bland's ticket mate in 1896 but had been one of the chief financiers of the Ohio Democratic Party and had in the months after the 1904 elections bought the Washington Post as well, giving him an excuse to be in Washington full time as he managed his new acquisition. McLean was a choice met with some skepticism by progressives, including Johnson, but was accepted as he was seen as a capable administrator, having a keen understanding of finance and would have outside interests to concern himself with and thus be unlikely to interfere in the major overhauls of banking and securities that Hearst viewed as his primary mandate from the voters [1]. As Secretary of War, he appointed prominent New Jersey attorney (and key protege of Senate Majority Leader McAdoo) Lindley Garrison; to the Naval Department went John D. Smith of Maryland, also a former failed running mate, and to the Department of Agriculture a sop to the radicals with Charles Bryan, brother of William. Hearst was quite pleased with his Cabinet, and with the major offices selected, had little concern about their approval by the Senate upon his inauguration on March 4, 1905.

    His inauguration was financed primarily on his own dime; it was easily the most lavish in decades, and had a different tenor to it. Save a four-year interregnum, Liberals had dominated the Presidency for a quarter-century, and Hearst entering office with supermajorities in Congress and his party in control of most of the states was a decisive break from that status quo most Americans were used to. The inauguration thus had a revolutionary, modern feel to it; Hearst and Johnson, like most younger people of the day, wore no facial hair, and Hearst's speech was famed for its fiery zeal. In it, he drew comparisons to the age of his idol Jackson, decrying "an oligarchy of moneyed interests and corrupted state power, governing the nation not through the will of the popular vote but the vagaries of minute legalism and the prejudices of the wealthy." In the inaugural address's most famous riposte, he declared, "Our Republic will prosper at home and among all nations of the world only when its foundation is one of common cause," and then somberly continued, "an age in which liberty and justice are known only by the few means that tyranny and injustice are thus reserved for the masses."

    It was pure Hearst - populist, idealist and demagogic, yet also upbeat, eloquent and sharply incisive. Many in the crowd were stunned at its tone, but many more were ebullient that at last Washington seemed to have a new cadre of leadership that had replaced its conservative and stagnant political class. The Hearst Era had come..."

    - Citizen Hearst

    [1] A lot of Democrats are going to have other ideas, of course, but this is where Hearst's attention lies and the reasoning will be expounded on in further updates
     
    Last edited:
    Scandinavia: The Birth of Union
  • "...Hagerup's government hung by a thread; Oscar II was adamant, however, that all efforts to preserve the narrow pro-Union majority in Norway be exhausted and thus refused Hagerup's private resignation in March of 1905, instead taking the more drastic measure of appointing Johan Ramstedt the Prime Minister of Sweden when Bostrom offered to be the sacrificial lamb who would resign to see the New Laws through the Storting. The King next dispatched the Crown Prince Gustaf [1] to Christiania, appointing him Regent, meant to demonstrate the seriousness with which Sweden took the unfolding crisis over the passage of the new organic acts, hoping that the Norwegian nationalists would see it the same way and the compromise would finally be passed in their original form.

    They did not. The Crown Prince was met with boos from the galleries as he implored the members of the parliament to pass the laws "and cement the equal footing our brother states stand upon." It was not enough; months of propaganda against the New Laws and infighting within Hagerup's coalition had left the Norwegian popular opinion polarized and frustrated, especially in the poor economic conditions of 1905. Only the conservative aristocracy of Norway and the upper echelons of its army and navy were uniform in their support of the Union; Hagerup was seen as their tool, and the tool of Swedish autocracy. Hagerup thus introduced the New Laws to the Storting as the Union Act of 1905, but committed a grave political sin in doing so - his split Cabinet had promulgated a bill that they did not know for certain could pass. Even worse, Hagerup presumed a win-win in doing so. If the New Laws he had helped draft with little Parliamentary input passed, the crisis of the Union would end instantly. If not, he had his evidence to go to the less hardline Ramstedt and the King and begin the process of amending the new organic laws of both states and could do so in a process that had more support of his full Cabinet.

    Hagerup's assumption that that was how the potential aftermath of a defeat would play out was grossly misjudged. He had entirely failed to account for what a triumph the defeat of the reforms would be for the absolutists, and he had also neglected to inform Crown Prince Gustaf of his gambit and instead fed Stockholm and the regency a host of tall tales about how the passage was imminent and he had only to sway the Cabinet. Nearly half of his Cabinet voted against the Union Act and much of his own party, and the opposition in lockstep, voted it down, an ignonimous defeat. Hagerup announced his resignation from the floor of the Storting before voting was already done and pro-independence, republican democrat Christian Michelsen earned the confidence of the Storting to form an emergency cabinet.

    Though Oscar and his advisors had braced for a defeat, the margin stunned them and put paid to Hagerup's pretty lies, and only further turned the Swedish establishment against parliamentary democracy if "mob rule" would precipitate such international crises at the whim of an "uninformed majority." The Swedish Army was quietly asked to begin preparations to mobilize as Christiana descended into chaos, and then the second thunderbolt struck the Norwegian capital - this time, it was the Swedes who had misjudged, in entrusting the reactionary Crown Prince [2] with the unilateral power of the Regency. In previous crises - 1884, 1895, 1898 - Oscar had always had time to deliberate with his ministers (more often than not Bostrom) and consult his iron-willed wife, the Queen Sophia, on what to do next. Gustaf very much sought to be his own man, however, and had more than once considered his father's deference to his mother's input as less a patient man seeking out the more measured thoughts of a woman he trusted but rather a wife who overly dominated her cowed husband. The Crown Prince instead requested the Norwegian Cabinet behind Michelsen resign (in his cloistered view, resign in disgrace) due to the "unprecedented" nature of the "crisis at hand" of the Union Act being rejected and Michelsen, who had hoped for such an overreaction, tried not to contain his delight as he agreed and advised the King to dissolve the Storting in order to call early elections, which would be viewed at home and abroad as a referendum on not only the New Laws but Norway's continuation in the Union itself..." [3]

    - Scandinavia: The Birth of Union

    [1] OTL's Gustaf V
    [2] Very pro-German and the one who encouraged his father not to yield IOTL; Queen Sophia's advice won out, as usual.
    [3] Granted, rejecting a constitutional reform of the Union by a healthy majority is precisely the thing that dissolving a Parliament for early elections is for but there's a big distinction, etiquette-wise and politically, between Michelsen calling for said elections first and the conservative Swedish Regent dissolving Parliament after it rejects his preferred constitutional settlement, even if in practice what he did is appropriate
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top