Republicans win non-hispanic whites 100%, Democrats win non-whites 100%. Or on other words the Red counties are those with a majority of non-hispanic whites.
Guess what this county map shows.
Republicans win non-hispanic whites 100%, Democrats win non-whites 100%. Or on other words the Red counties are those with a majority of non-hispanic whites.
Guess what this county map shows.
Republicans win non-hispanic whites 100%, Democrats win non-whites 100%. Or on other words the Red counties are those with a majority of non-hispanic whites.
Modern districts in 1789? Wut?1788-1790
Totals:
Pro-Administration: 64
Anti-Administration: 43
PRO-ADMINISTRATION MAJORITY BY 10
That's the entire premise. Also, it's like the House of Commons.Modern districts in 1789? Wut?
Republicans win non-hispanic whites 100%, Democrats win non-whites 100%. Or on other words the Red counties are those with a majority of non-hispanic whites.
Here's the national map, if it helps.
WV?1788-1790
Totals:
Pro-Administration: 64
Anti-Administration: 43
PRO-ADMINISTRATION MAJORITY BY 10
20 pt swing to democrats in the south, 20 pts to republicans in the north?Here's the national map, if it helps.
20 pt swing to democrats in the south, 20 pts to republicans in the north?
I wonder, is this also based upon the counties and states where Rutherford wins, and the different regions he carries? An explanation would be nice.
I see. But, jokes aside, I think it is also an accurate description of the maps which I have posted. The fact that Rutherford does so exceptionally well in the Northeast, and also manages to appeal to white working-class and rural voters in the Midwest and Appalachia at the same time. What kind of political views would Rutherford have to hold to be able to accomplish both at the same time?No, it’s based on the fact William Rutherford maps were the next trope after Baker v Manchin maps. I think the joke went over your head.
Maybe people of French-Canadian ancestry aren't considered white????That doesn't explain Vermont, though...
In my scenario, I basically have it that Rutherford is a former governor and senator from Minnesota, probably of the centrist or populist type.What’s the origin of Rutherford?
Modern borders. So, West Virginia won't come into play until the 1860s.
Do you have state margins for this?Basically, this started out as a project evaluating how much Trump's approval has shifted within the country to a 2020 prediction (still based upon approval numbers and a few other things).
This will be fun to revisit in 3 years to see how utterly wrong I will be:
Thanks to @Chicxulub for using GIMP to help me fill in much of this