PART XIX - NEW DEAL, NEW AUTHORITIES, NEW CITIES
  • CHAPTER II - THE LAND OF THE FREE

    PART I - THE RISE OF THE NEW DEAL


    Excerpt from

    The New Deal Ascendant
    by George Faraday


    Fresh from his victory in the passing of the Judicial Procedures Reform Act (JPRA), President Roosevelt went big on more New Deal laws to bring the American economy out of the Great Depression. Especially after Felix Frankfurter's appointment to the Supreme Court (Frankfurter was the largest comservative influence in Roosevelt's economic planning), Keynesians controlled the President's ears, and successfully lobbied for more spending from 1937 and beyond.

    bMiXoecm.png

    Progressive Fiorello LaGuardia headed the Reconstruction and Recovery Authority's programs from 1937 to the end of World War II.


    A NEW DEAL FOR NEW CITIES

    With these developments, the Recovery Authority Act (RAA) of 1937 was passed on September 24, 1937 after being voted 87-9 in the Senate and 365-70 in the House in the previous nights. It created the Reconstruction and Recovery Authority (RRA), which was first headed by Fiorello LaGauardia, a former Republican-turned Progressive [1], which built public works, infrastructure, dams and other establishments in the South, the Mountain West, Oregon/Washington, California, the Northeast, and other hard-hit areas of the Depression as highly-expanded versions of the Tennessee Valley Authority, which was itself expanded in the RRA. The act also called for the "cleanup" of existing cities and their urban renewal.

    Perhaps the most ambitious provision of the Recovery Authority Act was the Reconstruction and Recovery Authority's job to expand the powers of the Resettlement Administration [2] and create new cities in all 48 states of the Union. The cities' construction would provide much needed jobs for millions of Americans, and give further jobs in other economic sectors once these cities are constructed, providing urban opportunities and recovery in each state for the hard-hit people of the Depression. Thus, the cities were called the "new cities of hope" by many.

    Most of these cities were located in the Midwest and Northeast to enable industry to recover and expand in these areas and avoid overcrowding in other existing cities in these states and migrants who were flocking to the these ares. Many cities were also located in the West Coast to cater to the needy in those areas, and owing the region's moderate climate, these cities proved to be conducive to good business environments. In the South and most of the Mountain West, there was only one city per state, as there were existing cities that were utilized by the RRA for industrial expansion. Finally, some cities were located near to but not in the Dust Bowl [3], to welcome people fleeing from the worsening environment in that area.

    1f3MZCGm.png

    Central City, Missouri, the first new city constructed during the Roosevelt administration
    The first new city to be constructed was Central City, Missouri, which was founded on December 26, 1937. Built to welcome refugees from the Dust Bowl, it catered to farmers, industrialists, blue collar workers, Blacks, and other minorities who wanted to rise out of poverty, and found their long-awaited opportunities in the city. Much migration happened from rural areas to the city, which had ample residential and livelihood areas for the new migrants. A good business environment fostered entrepreneurship in the city, and investors flocked to it, turning the city into a beacon of prosperity in the Midwest in years and making it independent of the federal government. It is the largest planned city with around 2.7 million residents.
    Other large cities constructed during the time, such as Gotham (the name caming from the jumbling of the letters of the surname "Morgenthau", from Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau) and Blüdhaven in New Jersey (named after the late Hans Blüdhaven, a worker who died saving kids from a mishap during the city's construction), Keystone City and Smallville in Kansas, Varsity City, Pennsylvania, Star City, California, Calvin City, Indiana, and other cities were constructed from 1938 to 1941, and the same environment that led to the Central City's success were replicated in such cities.


    uTc1clQl.png

    Civil rights advocates protest in National City, California in favor of Voting Rights, June 1, 1960

    The cultural effects of the new cities were staggering. Farmers, white collar and blue collar workers, industrialists, entrepreneurs, artists, Blacks and other minorities flocked into to those cities, leading to extremely diverse cultural melting pots in such areas, and activism in such areas flourished. Even the later suburbs in those cities heavily voted Democratic, unlike in other suburbs across the country, which vote Republican. Also, the start of the Silver Age of Comics precipitated the rise of mascotry in such cities, and the rise of mascots in other leading cities in the United States.

    b9HcEE4.png

    Widespread city mascotry orignated in the new cities and spread to other existing cities in the United States, as shown in this 2016 poster in the Metropolis Heritage Museum showing Superman as Metropolis' mascot.
    Finally, since these new cities were created during President Roosevelt's time, these places became extremely solid Democratic strongholds, regularly voting for Democratic candidates in a 9-to-1 ratio. Thus, in states where they were created, these new cities either tilted some states further in favor of Democrats, such us in Delaware, Massachusetts and New York, turned would be-red states into purple ones, such as Indiana, or make the Democrats' vote margins close in some states that remain Republican, such us in Utah and Wyoming. If there was any New Deal initiative that successfully tilted the national environment in favor of the Democrats, it was the construction of these new cities.

    ----------------------------------

    Author's note: to see the map of the new cities, check it here.


    ----------------------------------

    [1]. The greater decline of the Republicans ITTL and the greater shift to Keynesianism/social democracy leads him to stay with the Progressive Party ITTL.

    [2]. The Resettlement Administration created new, small communities to aid the needy during the Depression. ITTL, such efforts get expanded and thus, new and large cities are born ITTL.

    [3]. The Dust Bowl was an area in Northern Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado and New Mexico that were devastated by drought, great sandstorms, and erosion in the 1930s. OTL and TTL, those areas get environmental and conservation programs help from the US Government.

    ----------------------------------

    This update was originally TNF's ideas, but I borrowed to explore many alternate possibilities in my TL.

    Many names from the above cities do come from DC, but, according to this thread I started months ago on legal issues surrounding usage of such cities (and their DC Comics details) in my TL, I can use such details provided I don't make money off of "Onward March of Freedom", and I don't really intend on making money off of this work because it's just a hobby. :)
     
    Last edited:
    PART XX - MEDICARE FOR ALL
  • CHAPTER II - THE LAND OF THE FREE

    PART I - THE RISE OF THE NEW DEAL


    Excerpt from

    The New Deal Ascendant
    by George Faraday

    After the new cities had been constructed and the additional initiatives and economic stimuli provided by the Reconstruction and Recovery Authority had proven the strength of Keynesianism, and the economy continued to grow past 1937 and 1938. Thus, the economy finally surpassed 1929 levels and by 1940, it fully recovered by 1940, and thus ended the worst economic downturn in American history [1]. Thus, the voters rewarded the Democrats, who retained all their Senate seats and losing just a handful in the House of Representatives. Also, many New Deal Democrats successfully launched primary challenges to many anti-New Deal Democrats in the South during that election cycle, especially in the Mountain West and South. The 76th Congress had a more than two-thirds supermajority of hardcore New Deal Democrats, who gladly passed more New Deal measures. Now, after the midterms, Roosevelt had one major legislative agenda in mind: universal health care.

    HEALTH IS A HUMAN RIGHT - THE HEALTH CARE DEBATE OF 1939

    In reality, 1939 was not the first time President Franklin Roosevelt tried to push for universal health care. During the battle to pass Social Security in 1935, Roosevelt tried to extend Social Security coverage to all Americans' medical expenses, but pull the proposal out at the last minute due to American Medical Association (AMA) objections.

    The second health care battle commenced on February 18, 1939, when the American Health Services Act (AHSA) was introduced by two-term Representative Hubert Humphrey (D-MN). The proposal called for a single national insurance system to cover all Americans' medical expenses, including prescription drugs and other medically necessary treatments, and pay health care providers decent money, with some regulations. It also called for adequate funding for all health care centers. This proposal was actually watered from Humphrey's ideal version of a full government-run health care similar to what would be established in the United Kingdom in 1946, but Humphrey retracted that idea, since he thought that many Americans considered such a plan as socialistic, and antagonism from the AMA had to be lessened and the organization put to sleep to be able to coax more swing-vote Southern and Mountain West Democrats to vote for the bill.

    Also, Southern Democrats, who were still keen on maintaining hospital segregation at the time, opposed government-run health care, as it would allow African Americans to be treated in White-only hospitals. The watered-down version of the bill that provided for national health insurance placated Southern Democrats, because although African Americans get full medical insurance, they would still be treated in Black-only hospitals [2].

    nGVkA8zm.png

    President Franklin Roosevelt signs the AHSA into law, December 31, 1939

    The debates lasted for months. More moderate Democrats successfully worked a proposal to establish the Welfare Fraud Administration in the bill, a national apparatus to deal with welfare fraud and prevent able-bodied people from becoming lazy, and ensure a federal jobs guarantee with reeducation like the Works Progress Administration (though in high-paying jobs), whilst all Americans get universal health care and others who needed welfare got what they need. Provisions to exclude the mentally and physically disabled, full-time housewives/housebands, and those who are studying from the work requirement were also included. This ensured supermajoritarian support for the bill. The House of Representatives finally passed the AHSA 332-103 on December 2, and the Senate 76-20 on December 9. It was finally signed by President Roosevelt on New Year's Eve 1939, as a New Year's gift for Americans. America finally had universal health care, and although hospital segregation was still in place, it would eventually be tackled in the future. The new system was called "Medicare" a portmanteau of "medical" and "care". It would become the fourth rail of politics, with no future politician daring to touch the health care system.


    -------------------------------------------

    [1]. I believe so, yes. The economy would have fully recovery by 1940 ITTL because the New Deal economic expansion won't be stopped from 1937 ITTL.

    [2]. Extremely despicable, but yes. This was the system in the United States at the time. Hospital segregation was the system back then.

    Happy New Year viewers! This is the last update for 2017. See you in 2018!
     
    Last edited:
    PART XXI - FINAL NEW DEAL REFORMS AND AMERICAN WAR PREPARATIONS
  • CHAPTER II - THE LAND OF THE FREE

    PART I - THE RISE OF THE NEW DEAL


    Excerpt from

    The New Deal Ascendant
    by George Faraday
    President Roosevelt's second term was about to come to a close. With war looming in Europe, President Roosevelt had to act on domestic policy fast before foreign policy dominated his tenure.


    A NEW DEAL FOR SAVINGS

    On January 11, 1940, the Savings Reform Act (SRA) was introduced in the House. It aimed to form supplemental savings accounts (SSAs) for Social Security enrollees, finance by a fourth of the payroll tax. This was promoted by Brain Truster Thomas Corcocan to encourage Americans to save money for reasons other than retirement. The United States Postal Savings System (PPS) would handle the SSAs, so as not to ruin small banks. The SRA passed 323-112 in the House of Representatives and 77-19 in the Senate. Many conservatives, not liberals, voted for the SRA to encourage savings through the SSAs, and it was signed into law by President Roosevelt on March 1, 1940.


    3ABRaX8m.png

    President Franklin Roosevelt signs the SRA into law, March 1, 1940

    Three massive changes happened due to the SRA. Firstly, it ensured that all working Americans and their beneficiaries have bank accounts for unforeseen economic shocks. Secondly,it promoted a culture of saving in the United States. No longer were Americans attuned to spendthrift lifestyles, but fiscal prudence became enshrined with the SSAs. Finally, it provided much-needed money for the United States as the PPS became a main government-run bank of the United States, making it easier for Americans to invest in federal funds, bonds and T-bills. The United States would thus not be in danger of bankruptcy, as money became a cycle from government to the people, and vice versa.



    A NEW DEAL FOR INFRASTRUCTURE

    jieY01Xt.png
    JgyvYsNt.png
    LbOogVWt.png

    From left to right: Construction of a Merrit-Parkway bridge in Connecticut; the construction of new public buildings;
    and the Interstate Railway System in 1945

    The second reform was infrastructure. The United States' infrastructure crumbled as the Great Depression started, and only by the late 1930s did the situation improve. To accelerate that development, President Franklin Roosevelt proposed the Rebuild America Act (RAA) on April 2, 1940. It entailed 30 billion dollars in infrastructure spending, additional funds for highway construction, and 10 billion dollars for an infrastructure bank, which would have more funds per year. Many large cities and the newly-built planned cities would have revamped and electrified subway and tram systems for both passenger and freight rail. It also gave funds to the creation of many modern airports in such cities, especially in big cities such as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Detroit, Los Angeles, Cleveland, and other major US cities.

    It also improved waterways, harbors and shipping channels. Telecommunications, Water, electricity and gas lines would also be fixed and modernized, as well as dams and other power plants. In areas where it is possible, undergrounding of electric power lines would be conducted. Fossil fuel-powered plants would be rapidly constructed to facilitate the increased electricity needs of the above infrastructure projects. It also planned to fix infrastructure and expand cleaning efforts in inner cities.
    The act also established the Interstate Railway System (NIRS). It connected all major and planned cities across the United States, investing ten billion dollars in such a great endeavor. The lines would later

    The RAA passed the Senate 88-8 on May 25, 1940, and the House of Representatives 384-41 on June 11, 1940. The infrastructure sector would expand to around 13% of national GDP by 1945, especially with the advent of World War II, to facilitate easy movement of military goods and soldiers across the United States.



    A NEW DEAL FOR SCIENCE

    EnTTHKLm.png

    Poster promoting scientific research for national defense in late 1940

    The third reform was scientific research. Roosevelt placed emphasis on scientific development coordinated with the government and private partners to advance the United States' technological advancement and economic growth. The Scientific Investment Act (SIA) was introduced on July 11, 1940, giving eight billion dollars to scientific research and research projects in the United States. It also strengthened patent rights in the United States and provision for high compensation for early publication of patented goods, such as medicine for the country's universal Medicare system. It unanimously passed in the Senate and House, owing to the greater need of technological advancement for the military and civil economy to prepare the United States for the increased threat of World War II in Europe by that time.

    One of the projects that got significant attention was the secret Manhattan Project at the time, which aimed to build an atomic weapon for the United States. Led by James Marshall and worked by scientists such as the famed scientist Albert Einstein, the program was accelerated throughout the early 1940s. Whether it would be completed in time before any other enemy power does so remained in question at the time.


    A NEW DEAL AGAINST THE MARIJUANA TAX

    As American society became more socially conservative during the 1930s, pushback against marijuana slowly gained traction in Congress during the time. The Marihuana (sic) Tax Act of 1937 tried to introduce a tax on all marijuana consumption and selling. Liberals in Congress managed to defeat the bill, as well as the American Medical Association's opposition to its tax on medical marijuana. Numerous attempts were attempted through 1938 until 1940, but all those efforts were killed [1].

    THE ARSENAL OF DEMOCRACY: AMERICA'S MILITARY BUILDUP IN WORLD WAR II

    With the threat of economic collapse gone by 1940, the main issue was the start of World War II in Europe. President Franklin Roosevelt was pushed by the American public and his recently-reconciled wife (the President vowing to avoid any extramarital affairs) and activist Eleanor to run for a third term, and did so in 1940. He picked Henry Wallace as his running mate, and won the general election against Wendell Willkie on a platform of defense and stability as war ravaged Europe. Democrats also retained their numbers in Congress, with a few seats getting shaved off in the House of Representatives. With a unified government heading into 1941, President Roosevelt was ready to tackle the issue of war and lead the United States to dance through the fire and defeat any possible enemy of the United States.

    0Gud5Vp.png

    The first war issue was the Battle of France, which spooked the United States into possible Nazi domination of Europe. Hence, on January 1, 1941, Congress passed the Lend-Lease Act to aid their Western European partners battle Nazi Germany. Under Lend-Lease, massive shipment of goods were allocated to British and French forces from March 1941 onwards, hoping to hold their forces down against their Nazi enemies. This was the first direct act the Roosevelt administration took on addressing the Second World War, and only time would tell if they would be fully dragged into it.

    Yjs1aMom.png

    British students eating American bacon and eggs in March 1941
    -------------------------------------------

    [1]. The Marihuana Tax Act (MTA) of 1937 led to the criminalization of marijuana in the United States and the subsequent disastrous War on Drugs in the 1970s. The defeat of the MTA signifies massive butterflies to American drug policy in the future.

    -------------------------------------------

    And that's the end of Chapter II. Chapter III will tackle Europe in the 1930s. Stay tuned in the future!
     
    Last edited:
    PART XXII - WORLD WAR II, WESTERN FRONT, PART I
  • CHAPTER III - WORLD WAR II

    PART I - THE WESTERN FRONT BEGINNINGS


    Excerpt from

    The Storm's Resurgence: World War II in Europe
    by George Faraday


    While the Great Depression started in the United States, its ripple effects spread to the Old Continent as well. The relative prosperity of the 1920s gave way to the chaos of the 1930s, eventually leading to the Second World War.


    BLOODY INSURGENCE: NAZI GERMANY IN WORLD WAR II

    At the onset of the Great Depression, the Nazi Party was just a rump part garnering 2.6% of the popular vote in the 1928 parliamentary elections in the country. Then, a coalition of Social Democratic, Catholic Center, German Democratic, and German People's parties ruled the country. This coalition ruled the country through the Depression, which hit the country hard with more than a quarter of its workforce unemployed by 1933, and the coalition was considered weak and ineffective at handling the country's economic crisis. This provided fertile ground for Adolf Hitler and the Nazis' rise to power. Through some deadly miscalculations by establishment politicians, cunning tricks and political trickery and arm-twisting, Hitler became chancellor on January 30, 1933, and soon after, he outmaneuvered other conservative politicians and installed himself as dictator of Germany.

    Throughout the decade, he blamed Germany's woes and communism as a plot by Jews to destroy the country. The people followed his misinformation, and swayed public opinion against them. Soon, Jews were being rounded up in Germany to be locked up in concentration camps, later becoming extermination camps as the war started. He espoused belief in "lebensraum" (living space) for Germans in Eastern Europe, targeting both Poland, the Soviet Union, and other eastern European ethnic groups, which were labelled as "untermensch" (subhumans) groups not worthy to be kept alive, and that the lands of these groups were "deserving" for "Aryans", i.e., Germans, only.

    AI1Ez2km.png

    The German invasion of Poland in Warsaw
    Soon, the Nazis consolidated power and, taking advantage of Britain's appeasement policy to quickly expand its economy, take over Austria, and set the country's military to war footing by 1939. On September 1 that year, Nazi Germany invaded Poland. France and Britain declared war on them in Poland's defense, but they were successful in conquering it in weeks, which was sealed with the Soviet Union's invasion from the east, which signed a nonaggression pact with the Nazis to divide Poland. Soon afterwards, they turned their attention towards France in May 1940.

    THE HEXAGON HAS NOT PERISHED: FRANCE IN WORLD WAR II

    D9TR4hDm.jpg

    The Battle of France, 1940

    On May 10, 1940, the Nazis invaded the Low Countries [1] and France. Employing their "blitzkrieg" (lightning war) tactics to crush France quickly in hopes of preventing World War I-style trench warfare, the Nazis caught its enemies by surprise as it instead made an advanced armored push into the Ardennes instead of rehashing updated World War I plans of an invasion through much of Belgium's northwest. The French lines seemed on verge of collapse and seemed hopeless, until a breakthrough on May 14.

    eBSbSm4m.jpg

    The Nazis tried to rout France via an offensive into the Ardennes, but met heavy resistance and experienced a counterattack from French forces soon afterward.

    On the afternoon of May 14, the French discovered that two of the three Panzer divisions formed up in a line facing westward in Sedan had only a single infantry regiment protecting their left, southern flank. At that moment, the French 3rd Armored and 3rd Mechanized Divisions were forming up directly to the south of them in preparation for a counterattack. The French High Command [2] green-lighted the attack, and soon, the German lines were crushed and the Panzer divisions were under threat of intense bombardment (as French fighters and anti-aircraft equipment were moved to the area to support the counterattack), and inadequate infantry support for the German flank, and they had to retreat. This gave the French time to remove some of their best light armored divisions to be withdrawn from Belgium and allowed the Third Armored Division to recuperate and fight for another day (given that it was nigh unprepared for a fight at the time) [3].

    Meanwhile, in the Low Countries, the air battles were fierce, as French D.520s and German Me 109s constantly engaging in dogfights above them and their anti-aircraft guns at full force trying to shoot down each other's foes. While this front had fierce fights, it was evenly matched, as both sides had equal amounts of downed aircraft [3], as the French was able to invest more resources into improving their Air Force as war in Europe neared [4].

    In other areas, such as in Belgium and in other areas of Northeastern France, more reserves came back to France damaged but still able to fight for another day in what was called the "March of Survival" [5]. The remaining forces that were in place fought to hold the German offensive back, and the offensive soon slowed down by the end of May. The Germans still tried to advance further to the coast in a bid to cut off French forces in Belgium, but by then, they were bogged down and the extra armored division reserves that were evacuated were fixed, refitted with brand new equipment, and were able to hold off the Germans. The French forces, under their new commander Maxime Weygand, managed to mount successful counterattacks to the Nazis until the second British Expeditionary Force (BEF) arrived on Mid-June to bolster Allied forces in Northeastern France.

    The French-British forces tried to pounce German lines again in Sedan, Belgium, and the Netherlands in late June and the Germans did the same, but, neither was able to push forward. In a repeat of the First World War, the Allied and German front lines stagnated once more. But what stood out by the end of 1940 was that France, again, did not fall to the German invasion, and was able to continuing fighting.

    ----------------------------------

    [1]. Belgium, Netherlands, and Luxembourg.

    [2]. The French leave the gold standard earlier and they are able to invest more resources into improving their communication lines and other logistically-important equipment.

    [3]. This counterattack was cancelled IOTL.

    [4]. Same reason as #2.

    [5]. This replaces the Dunkirk evacuation as a symbol of Allied resistance.
     
    Last edited:
    PART XXIII - WORLD WAR II, WESTERN FRONT, PART II
  • CHAPTER III - WORLD WAR II

    PART II - THE WESTERN FRONT, PART II




    Excerpt from

    Destroying Swastikas
    By Nicholas Steinfield


    By the end of 1940, the front lines in the Western Front were more or less static, and would remain so for the next few years. As a result, by 1941, in a manner similar (but different in tactics and equipment used) to the trench wars of World War I, four bloody meatgrinders emerged, namely at Sedan, Ostend, Lille and Maubuege.


    rMDXlngywxK87dDGabVtz3-utI7wbARO1-WiaL1W-YzxLsD7HZMR4CN6YEP7A6CP4W69tLWiOspGRAzQW_QO_FEpSuREisOc-9Ql9LWK8dn0rBbqmWW_98vJhl2PN613FjpWuUyB

    French tanks in the Second Battle of Sedan, May 11, 1941


    After the relative calm during winter and the rainy spring as the Allies and Nazi Germany recouped their losses, fighting began first at Sedan on May 10, 1941, a year after Nazi Germany first tried to invade France through the city via the Ardennes. Hitler ordered 400,000 troops, 1,500 tanks, 80,000 vehicles, 2300 aircraft, 450 artillery pieces, and 200 rubber boats to enable the Germans to crush the French and British Armies as an effective force and achieve the goal of destroying much of the Allied Armed Forces in Northern France, which was unrealized in the first Battle of Sedan when the Nazis first invaded. The Germans secured some bridgeheads at Sedan going as far as pushing the French out of the city altogether, but again, Allied counter-offensives were able to push the Germans back by October 1941. Frontlines at Sedan would switch back and forth between the Allies and the Nazis for months. By then, two million people were dead in the worst and longest battle during the Second War.


    TWOQjPJJx11gK9hLu6yIOmfA7yfjU12ENYkLsLZd_LWGMPko6F8-8t1bBDySuQZaG5Non5lLakLgghJhkCX3R8cy3iCe7ASVyGnxziJuwHXMfvZdIu7scVQXrCM4RI8N_aYbPqjO

    French Tanks lining up at the Battle of Abbeville, September 29, 1941

    Meanwhile, Lille was also of prime importance to the Nazis, because if they took the city, they could surround a huge chunk the British and French forces in Dunkirk, Calais and Ostend, send them into disarray, and cut off Allied supplies in the area in their quest to reach Paris. The Germans were able to overrun the city on September 7, 1941 and get some 30,000 Allied prisoners-of-war. Soon after, they continued a steady but arduous march towards Abbeville to encircle Allied forces to the North, but an Allied counterattack, aided by rainy weather that softened the Germans’ mobile advantage, prevented the enemy from quickly reaching the English Channel at Abbeville and Amiens and thus prevented the coastal roads from being overrun and cut by the Germans, enabling Calais, Dunkirk, and Ostend to be continuously supplied. This campaign proved costly to both sides, as around 300,000 casualties were recorded throughout the operations. Afterwards, the British sent its third Expeditionary Force to help the French battle the Nazis. Many of these forces enabled the French to hold the line at Abbeville, Amiens and Ostend, whilst providing reserve strength for the French to defend Paris from any invasion. They also helped the French defeat many German battleships across the North Sea, culminating with the sinking of the Bismarck on May 27, 1941. This enabled France to devote more people to the wartime economy. Eventually, this led to the conscription of women and hiring of women to the workforce in droves, being a helpful springboard for the French feminist movement.



    eAT5zpE635oovZgs_oju7saVvizl86qhcqrIYjix_j3M7f7NLxayXhMVskjO93DULXSVljYEwhcI96Wyrmd1eF4E9dEBClWvJWaeq5HuFOrI22_-RNretwzlGVQ__27jjfH2Vwj0

    Luftwaffe fighter aircraft dropping bombs on Ostend, August 14, 1941


    Another bloodbath occurred in Ostend. The Belgian government fled to Ostend when Brussels was captured by the Nazis in the first few days of the Battle of France. From the start, the city was besieged by the Nazis, aiming to bloody the Allies there, stretch their forces as the Germans tried to cut them off at Abbeville, give them a springboard to take Dunkirk, Calais (which were two important port cities for the Allies as they were nearest to the British coast) and then to invade Northern France and get nearer to Paris in a repeat of the First World War, and perhaps capture the Belgian Royal Family and the Belgian government, who had defiantly refused to evacuate the besieged city to boost the morale of the Belgian people and the Allies. On August 14, 1941, the Nazis were able to enter the outskirts of the city, but a successful counteroffensive by the Allies pushed them back and even took back the city of Bruges and entered a slice of Dutch land, giving Ostend a cushion to protect itself. However, the city of Ghent was let go for the meantime to avoid overextending Allied lines. The Allies fortified themselves, and so did the Germans, and no side was able to push back against the other for the next few years. However, around 200,000 people were killed in the process and many military equipment were destroyed.


    mOVEn6umDMAhyTkJUYTDsgK6VgpI0XH1sMnpvc8tWI1eW1i4-fysydV2K26Na-5JY-GfhuMz1170jlajeNAbTJLJZDx5FLUvzqOaBtYImukvHX4pOJkYzZxtM0-N2FujrJYe6b3b

    Nazi soldiers cross the River Somme with French POWs, September 12, 1941


    Since the battles in Sedan, Ostend, and Lille occurred simultaneously, the Nazis also tried to push through Maubeuge in an effort to stretch Allied allies push deeper into France on August 19, 1941. With French and British forces concentrated near the English Channel and Sedan, the Germans were able to break through and take the city of Saint-Quentin and were only a few miles for Compiegne and Soissons, where French and British reserves, which were fully repaired and equipped after they were able to return to French land after the May 14, 1940 miracle counterattack against the Nazis at Sedan, awaited. At Compiegne and Soissons, more troops and equipment than the Lille and Ostend battles were used, with 500,000 troops, 1,200 tanks, and 1,000 aircraft used to fight the last few miles on the road to Paris. The Nazis were able to take both Compiegne and Soissons in a big hit at Allied morale and a great waste of Allied soldiers and equipment and were able to advance to within 50 kilometers from the French capital. Fortunately, they were able to prevent the Germans from gaining even further ground, as the Nazis stopped more movements in the center since if they pushed too far towards Paris, they could be outflanked and encircled by the Allies.


    2hlhyk16oHQQ7CR8aiqE1BQiVyRKl9FJYp-nxgt6Akw0N5ETx1Sazsq-_Gq2Y2DyXtHVZcJEWOLrrjGj0dHZgNhB7Kwup_RTT_vRDmtEkYEcmZFz4cbIry3L3ynNoOpIAlpBmjDE

    Lend-Lease ships leaving Boston, Massachusetts for France, August 29, 1941


    Meanwhile, as soon as World War II started in Europe, the Battle of the Atlantic began. The Allies, led by Britain and France, commenced a naval blockade of Nazi Germany, which retaliated in return. Nazi U-Boats attacked British and French ships in the North Sea and the Atlantic in an attempt to starve the two nations of resources, while Allied warships and submarines effectively halted trade to the Nazis. As a result, the Nazis turned to the Soviet Union, which they signed a nonaggression pact with, for natural resources, and the Soviets in turn asked for technology and industrial goods, helping keep the German war machine fed.

    However, since France was able to hold its ground against Nazi Germany, most engagements between Allied and Nazi navies were concentrated in the North Sea and the English Channel. A few ships in the Atlantic were sunk by U-Boats, but there were relatively few skirmishes compared to the waters east of His Majesty’s country. This meant that Britain and France received more war resources than their enemy, especially with the United States establishing the Lend-Lease program for the Allies (the closest they ever got to waging war with Germany in 1941 without actually declaring so). As a result, Britain and France became stronger against Germany with the resources they got from the United States and the world [1].

    Also, the Allies battled Nazi Germany in Scandinavia. While Denmark was too late to be saved, Norway was a different story. With France not falling and with Royal and French Navies in a strong position, German losses on their way to establish a bridgehead in Norway was defeated, and the invasion of Norway failed as a result. This would be important for the Allies, as Norway provides them a base for fighters and bombers to bombard Germany's military bases and weaken it.

    By the end of 1941, the war was far from over. The Allies and Nazis consolidated their positions during that winter. The Germans were able to grind through some Allied ground at a great cost. Nevertheless, their war efforts were able to commence as they were financed by the Soviet Union. Finally, the Allies were able to halt many major Nazi offensives, and were able to prevent a general collapse of the frontlines as they did so in May 1940. However, the Allied Armed Forces still had many things to learn about strategy, tactics, mobile warfare, technology, air supremacy, and other matters. This hampered their ability to win the war in the Western Front early. But nevertheless, the Allies persisted and were able to prevent fall France once again in 1941 and prevent Norway from being occupied by Nazi Germany.

    Introductory excerpt from

    War Diaries
    By Anne Frank

    KjYT45O56JGVTERhHym_lYK5S4WHr344sYwKV2yq3D39ODXcVlGT5h3ZxgN91Wm45zNbq4jz-W5QA1mzEmmh1NC9w3aCTT08vg2MgKHeUbIrc8MUXK6Ss3Zi3z9wD9D7XmCQwLsq

    As the Nazis invaded the Netherlands, my father and mother hid us inside the Secret Annex for the next three years. My late old friends Miep Gies and Bep Voskuijl were kind to keep us there until the war ended, giving us the necessary food, water and supplies that kept us alive for that long. Afterwards, I continued with my diary, which I started on in 1938. We stayed in silence in the secret quarters in peace, waiting for the days of the war to end and eagerly hoping that the Allies to the south of us in France and Belgium would reach Amsterdam quickly, because we knew we were running on borrowed time inside the Secret Annex as the SS was frantically searching for Dutch Jews to be rounded up and killed. And, by God’s grace, we were liberated and were able to go to emigrate to the United Kingdom where we eventually became evangelical Christians, and I entered science and politics. We were then as a family were able to visit the extermination camps in Germany, Poland and Czechoslovakia.

    There, I was informed of the true horror my fellow Jews went through and how they died at the merciless hands of the Nazis. The gas chambers, the firing squads, they all made me cry for hours when I was there. By the time the war ended, 49% of all Jews in Europe had died, and the survivors were weakened, maimed and were unsure of what to do with their lives. These all happened as my family and I slept and ate with comfort in the Secret Annex, and this fact left me feeling some survivor’s guilt for the next five years after the war ended, knowing that I was in comfort while many of my brethren died in agony in the extermination camps. Eventually, the guilt was gone, and I felt a sense of anger at the Nazis and Germans, and perhaps the world itself, even God, for allowing this senseless tragedy of the Holocaust to happen. But with God, I realized everything happens for a reason in Him. I eventually forgave the Nazis and Germans and anyone who I thought was complicit with the murders of millions of Jews.

    But of course, forgiveness didn’t mean I would have let former Nazis on the loose or allowed Neo-Nazi revisionists to poison people’s minds. Of course I had those former Nazis arrested and campaigned against Nazis (but I did not really have the government suppress the Neo-Nazis' speech; as much as I hated what they say, the definition of “hate” is arbitrary per person, so the government cannot really determine what is hate and what is not), and instead of shaming them or ostracizing them as if they’re unredeemable, but rather, my approach to them is to get to the bottom of their problems in life and offer God’s Word of salvation to their lives, as only Jesus can change their lives. I have to say, it would have been extremely difficult for me to this approach had I been in the extermination camps myself and my family had been killed. But, even then, I believe we can always overcome hatred and help sinners and misfits become the best of themselves in God.

    Excerpt from

    Unholy Alliance: Italy and the Allies in The Second World War
    By Heinz Smathers


    BqDMxtBoQ1lHzpqOdwVSMliM0zqpF8TV0GVLF9H4i7PS0dhWIxkccI85vovNspDqnbxS5XyWGlIFYIv3ZnfSh8_QEwvS_NPr9iz6K6CpMg1xpWfyY8MORyDoLaPVuohFDurVI1JU

    Benito Mussolini, Italy’s fascist dictator from 1922

    In 1934, Italian leader Mussolini had set his sights on Abyssinia because he wanted to avenge Italy’s humiliating defeat of 1896. Besides that, he wanted to give Italy its coveted place under the sun, which, he figured, would be achieved by creating an Italian colony that dominated the Horn of Africa. The Italo-Ethiopian Treaty of 1928 stated that the border between Italian Somaliland and Ethiopia was twenty-one leagues or roughly 118 kilometers parallel to the Benadir coast. In 1930, Italy built a fort at the Welwel oasis in the Ogaden and garrisoned it with Somali Ascaris, which were irregular frontier troops commanded by Italian officers. The fort at Welwel was well beyond the twenty-one league limit and the Italians were encroaching on Abyssinian territory. In November 1934, Ethiopian territorial troops, escorting the Anglo-Ethiopian boundary commission, protested against Italy’s incursion. The British members of the commission soon withdrew to avoid embarrassing Italy. Italian and Ethiopian troops remained encamped in close proximity.

    In December 1934 a border incident took place at Welwel that killed 150 Ethiopians and two Italians. The League of Nations exonerated both parties and neither France nor Britain took strong steps against Italy, keen to keep it as an ally against a resurgent Germany. Italy was able to launch its invasion without interference primarily due to the United Kingdom and France placing a high priority on retaining Italy as an ally in case hostilities broke out with Germany. To this end, on January 7th 1935, France signed an agreement with Italy, giving them essentially a free hand in Africa to secure Italian cooperation.


    0Yn5D9E16LysS4z35oSDWysTtue42OIXpNQOEk3NzKUT0F90c0YGcZILBZolR1mJ1ceAn5-hVcZAIH4Y5aTRTzPpfeIa0Xg7yANHj9Xvx3fIhtAbm8jX7L9UWI-WArlTh7898nEL

    Italian, British and Italian leaders sign the Stresa Front, April 14, 1935


    In April, Italy was further emboldened by being a member of the Stresa Front. The Stresa Front was an agreement made in Stresa, a town on the banks of Lake Maggiore in Italy, between French Prime Minister Pierre Laval, British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald, and Italian dictator Benito Mussolini on April 14, 1935. Formally called the “Final Declaration of the Stresa Conference”, its aim was to reaffirm the Locarno Treaties and to declare that the independence of Austria “would continue to inspire their common policy”. The signatories also agreed to resist any future attempt by the Germans to change the Treaty of Versailles. In June, non-interference was further assured by a political rift that had developed between the United Kingdom and France following the Anglo-German Naval Agreement. On October 9, 1935, Italy invaded Ethiopia. Given the nigh complete absence of international support, a palace coup deposed Haile Selassie, who wanted to fight on until the end. His 19 year-old son Amha Selassie became the new puppet Emperor and was forced to sign over Tigray and Ogaden. The rest of the country became a de facto Italian protectorate as Amha Selassie was forced to sign commercial treaties that gave Italian companies access to Ethiopia’s mineral wealth, while a Consul-General took up residence in Addis Ababa as an “advisor to his Imperial majesty’s government” and as a “protector of Italian minority rights in Ethiopia”. The irony was that the Italian community in Ethiopia would never number more than 2% of the population, while at the same time dominating much of the economy of a nominally sovereign, independent country. However, nationalists would later negotiate a fair trade deal along the lines of the Philippine-American trade deal in 1946, or as trade experts say “the ‘golden standard’ of free trade”, as all free trade agreements were negotiated along the Fil-Am agreement.

    fD2Uc2dN5bwPf6Np6KmByajjdpEs3M7WZwNBoFuH-3TONbWDWTsygLmfffdDPyF_i1gms17I4MZdiG32_GioEYFCr-WxLs7tEEn53xIqvswDHsSvDDZL-LNtT1sLRLHlSbRhOrM2

    Nazi German soldiers enter the Rhineland, July 3, 1936

    The first issue that demonstrated how loose relations between the signatories of the so-called Stresa Front actually were, was the remilitarization of the Rhineland in July 1936. In reality only 3,000 German Wehrmacht soldiers entered the Rhineland, but French intelligence had come up with the number of 295,000 by counting SS, SA and Landespolizei (State Police) units as well. General Maurice Gamelin told the government a full scale mobilization would be needed, which would be unpopular while also costing 30 million francs a day. 1936 was an election year and the government didn’t want to alienate their constituents by means of a war against Germany, which seemed to be merely asserting its sovereignty. Moreover, it did not want to aggravate its economic woes: the country was gripped with financial crisis as there were insufficient reserves to maintain the value of the franc as pegged to the gold standard in regard to the US dollar and the British pound sterling. Huge loans would be needed to stabilize the situation, while a war needed to be avoided to destabilize it and cause a disastrous downfall.

    Serious overestimation of German military prowess, electoral concerns and a weak economy ensured a tame French response. The British response was lukewarm, to say at the least, as exemplified by Lord Lothian’s famous statement that the Germans were merely walking into their own backyard. Mussolini was irritated that Germany wasn’t being kept to the Treaty of Versailles and he expressed his annoyance about the worthlessness of agreements with the Western democratic powers to British ambassador Eric Drummond. Drummond could only apologize sheepishly, feeling ashamed for his country’s lackluster attitude and subsequently watched Italy drift away from the Anglo-French Entente. As a result, Italy supported the Nationalist forces in the Spanish Civil War with 50,000 troops, the so-called Corpo Truppe Volontarie (CTV) or Corps of Volunteer Troops (these veterans would prove effective in the Second World War). Britain and France assumed a slightly more favorable tone toward Franco, but it did little to fix their relations with Italy.

    In the meantime, Hitler was emboldened. The notion of uniting all German-speaking peoples into one nation state had been around since the 19th century, but at the time the “Kleindeutsch” (small German) solution won out, excluding Austria from Germany. Both the Weimar Republic and Austria included the political goal of unification into their respective constitutions, with massive support from democratic parties. In the early 1930s, popular support in Austria for a union with Germany remained overwhelming, and the Austrian government looked to a possible customs union with the German Republic in 1931. There were economic interests as well: it supplied Germany with magnesium and the products of the iron, textile and machine industries; it also had gold and foreign currency reserves; lastly, it had many unemployed skilled workers, hundreds of idle factories and large potential hydroelectric resources. Austria, however, devolved into an authoritarian, clerico-fascist, corporatist regime that looked to Italy for support, which they got when in 1934 Austrian Nazis attempted a coup d’état that led to the death of Austrian Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss. Italian sabre rattling was enough to make Hitler back down in 1934, which was no surprise since he didn’t have an army at the time. However, Nazi terrorist attacks continued until 1938 and killed roughly 450 people, despite the fact that Austrian Nazi leaders remained imprisoned and that the Nazis were harshly suppressed, leaving the movement disorganized and feeble.

    Mussolini supported Dollfuss’s successor Kurt Schuschnigg. But by 1936 the damage to Austria’s economy caused by the German boycott was too great and Schuschnigg informed Mussolini that he had to come to an agreement with Germany. Schuschnigg first agreed to release Nazi prisoners and later met Hitler in February 1938, acquiescing to his demands for Nazi appointees to the Austrian government. In March 1938, in an attempt to preserve Austria’s independence, Schuschnigg announced a referendum, but the plan backfired when it became clear that Hitler would not simply stand by as Austria reaffirmed its independence by public vote. Schuschnigg pleaded his case with Mussolini in a series of telegrams between Vienna and Rome, but the latter informed the Austrians that he would not fight Germany without the support of France and/or the United Kingdom. As a result, the Austrian Chancellor caved before threats of violence and Hitler, triumphantly and without opposition, marched into his birth country with his triumphal tour climaxing in Vienna.

    However, the so-called Anschluss would also have serious international ramifications. Mussolini, who was wary of Nazi Germany, wanted some kind of buffer area. Therefore, within three hours of the Wehrmacht marching into Austria, the Regio Esercito moved to occupy strategic locations just across the border. They enacted the contingency plan that had been created on Mussolini’s specific orders the moment that Hitler started to make noise about Austria in February 1938. Rome legitimized these snippets of Austrian territory under Italian occupation as the remainder of the Federal State of Austria, which had been illegally occupied by Germany. Kurt Schuschnigg was allowed to set up a government-in-exile in Italy and an “Austrian Division” was created in the Italian army composed of Austrian soldiers that had withdrawn into northern Italy. Hitler was predictably infuriated, but fighting Italy was quite a bit different than invading a country which had an army of only 30,000 men, which was completely passive to boot. The German ambassador was summoned to meet a similarly furious Duce, who blatantly bluffed that any move to stop him would result in war. A delusional Hitler still hoped to sweeten the deal and mend relations by officially denouncing any claims on South Tyrol. Mussolini shrugged, declined requests to have an audience with Hitler in Rome, and he refused to see German Foreign Minister Von Ribbentrop when he was in Rome to also visit the Vatican.

    More importantly, Mussolini was irritated about the attitude of his supposed Anglo-French allies, who demonstrated their complacency by aggrandizing a German territorial demand that contravened the stipulations of Versailles, further emboldening Hitler. Furthermore, the attitude of London and Paris toward the Austrian government-in-exile was conflicting: they didn’t recognize the Anschluss, but neither did they recognize Schuschnigg as the legitimate leader of Austria. Mussolini had an idea of what the Wehrmacht was capable of and he wasn’t confident enough to wage war against Germany by his lonesome. Therefore he expressed his bitter disappointment to the ambassadors of Britain and France concerning their countries’ attitude in this crisis. Chamberlain’s appeasement policy was condemned in the press organs of the fascist regime, including an article written by Mussolini’s sharp pen in the party newspaper “Il Popolo d’Italia” under a pseudonym that concluded that: “this Anglo-French policy of appeasement will only allow Nazi Germany to become stronger as well as bolder as its leaders see complacency, weakness, fear and dividedness among its bourgeois opponents. That will inevitably undermine the entire effort our countries have gone through to form a cordon around our common rival because distrust is irrevocably sewn if one ally ignores the interests of the other.” Relations between Britain and France on one hand and Italy on the other reached an all-time low as the British and French leaders knew what Mussolini was saying in the article, and the Stresa Front very nearly was a dead letter. Future Prime Minister Winston Churchill later agreed with Mussolini that this had been the wasted moment to nip Nazi German expansionism in the bud.


    aNwGIQdHsU5l-V2eNqqeUW_Fsr-l1y0Ey8tt0p_j1H0tH5FQIPZlBl8Ms8eV18UwyERDS8WspOciYuvso-N63enCe3TbqW_hq4-C7mRxEgtN9TuvxmyZpL4NwiHYxdXPnpoTYFf1

    Chamberlain and Hitler negotiating on Czechoslovakia, September 22, 1938. This angered Mussolini for the perceived softness of Britain and France towards Germany.

    Immediately after the Anschluss, Hitler made himself the advocate of ethnic Germans living in Czechoslovakia while Sudeten Nazis led by Konrad Henlein agitated for autonomy. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain met Adolf Hitler at his chalet in the Bavarian Alps at Berchtesgaden, the Berghof, on September 15 and agreed to the cession of the Sudetenland; three days later, French Prime Minister Édouard Daladier did the same. No Czechoslovak representative was invited to these discussions. Chamberlain met Hitler again in Godesberg on September 22 to confirm the agreements. Hitler, aiming to use the crisis as a pretext for war, now demanded not only the annexation of the Sudetenland but the immediate military occupation of the territories, giving the Czechoslovak army no time to adapt their defence measures to the new borders.

    Now, France and Britain turned to Rome, but Mussolini was not convinced of Anglo-French resolve and he merely proposed a four power conference. He wanted to conserve the fragile peace and give Italy more time to prepare for war. Mussolini’s arbitration staved off war because Hitler greatly admired the Duce, even though the two countries were not on a good footing due to the Anschluss. The Munich Conference peacefully transferred the Sudetenland to Germany in October 1938 and Hitler stated that it would be his last territorial claim, but in March 1939 he betrayed everyone’s trust by invading annexing Bohemia-Moravia and setting up Slovakia as a puppet state.

    After September 1939, Paris and London tried to get Rome to join the war against Germany and the latter demanded guarantees for the fair treatment of the Italian minority in Tunisia, an Italian say in the affairs of the Suez Canal, recognition of the annexation of Albania, and the establishment of Djibouti as a jointly administered free port. The Italian community in French Tunisia would have the same legal status as the French there, and Britain and France were willing to give Italy a share in the Suez Canal (though not big enough to threaten their position). Albania was unimportant enough for Britain and France to recognize its annexation by Italy as well. France was unwilling to give up Djibouti, but they exempted Italy from import duties. Italian core goals had been met, but the opportunistic Mussolini wasn’t shy to get more if he could. Among other things, France and Britain agreed that Italian territorial claims vis-à-vis Yugoslavia and even Greece were open to negotiation (not a minute later Mussolini bullied the Greeks into giving the Regia Marina basing rights in the Aegean Sea, and without British support the Greeks had no choice but to give in). However, Mussolini knew his people would need a better reason to fight than mere territorial gains. So for much of 1939 and early 1940, the precedent to declare war against Germany was nonexistent, and until May of 1940, when the Battle of France commenced, the Italians were still neutral.


    16m0OEeCOFjhEDJHzBWFgWliJGReUr52PldHpkVQ4G45iJAsjiSTg_SDEqbqWgmL6maOm2KPHLlsjL5abO4x7q1PJfQO8gba28MBHxOKMyntdvviubKCZjaBL1Otl6kkmap1vCep

    Benito Mussolini announcing Italy’s declaration of war against Germany, August 1, 1940


    But finally, on August 1, 1940, with the Allied leaders’ pleas, Italy finally declared war on Germany to defend its French and British allies, with Mussolini saying, “Germany only respect their own race, and they have only proven that no nation in Europe is safe from their aggression. One day, if we stay silent, Italy will be their next target of their murderous agenda, so right now, my fellow Italians, let us mobilize against the racist Nazis and defend our sovereignty!”

    Italy’s declaration of war against Germany perhaps saved France and Britain. Firstly, it diverted troops and resources that would otherwise had been invested in finishing Germany’s offensive through the Ardennes that would have cut off Allied forces in northern France and Belgium had they succeeded in May 1940. And studies of wartime German plans showed that as the Nazis barely broke ground in Northern Italy from late 1940 to 1941, the German offensives in Sedan, Lille, Maubeuge an Ostend would have been able to meet their desired goals of destroying the French and British Armed Forces. In other words, Germany may not have to fight a two-front war, but Italy distracted them enough to enable the French and British to fight for another day [1].



    Excerpt from

    Calm in the Center of the Storm
    By Elizabeth Boseman

    As the Western Front reached a stalemate, other parts Europe stayed silent since Poland's invasion in 1939, the leaders of the region’s countries smiling like the Cheshire Cat as they stayed peaceful even as Northwestern Europe burned to the ground.

    After the First World War and the Russian Civil War, The Soviet Union was in disrepair. Millions of people died and the economy was crippled, making the task of recovery extremely difficult for the Communist Party. However, through Premier Vladimir Lenin’s New Economic Program (NEP) and other economic measures which were done in the backdrop of the bloody Red Terror commenced by the Communists, the economy bounced back to pre-World War I levels, and the Soviet Union was on its way to become an industrialised country.


    u0MYebn0eaWrGHirCqA90RdyzZpiGTLaxC8GjW04QXV4JEp9aHaANZWNyP3N60cyxQm0Xb_64QYuOPTEkWLepOVZgKNUYC0enFWNMo--sbGhqxayU_v1zKmCxiPpQT90YEroAUKm

    Vladimir Lenin’s Testament radically shaped Soviet politics after his death.


    Matters seemed stable, the Soviet Union was stronger and its enemies vanquished (even as the Tsar and the rest of the Royal Family escaped Russia), save for the killings that happened during the Red Terror, but within the Communist Party, a battle was brewing between its disparate factions who were vying to seize power as Lenin’s health became frail. There were five factions that fought for power: one was the Stalinist-autocrat faction, headed by Joseph Stalin; the Left, headed by Leon Trotsky; the Center-Left, led by Grigory Zinoviev; the moderates, led by Lev Kamenev; and finally, the Right, led by Nikolai Bukharin, Mikhail Tomsky, and Alexei Rykov. Out of all the factions inside the Communist Party, the Stalinist faction had been gaining steam and was slowly putting their loyalists inside the Central Committee. However, this would be stopped soon, as the controversial Lenin’s Testament was released as the 12th Congress ended.

    In the last will he wrote before he died, Lenin denounced Stalin as a rude, power-hungry person, especially after Stalin disrespected his wife. This proved to be fatal for his career, and by the end of the 12th Congress, he was demoted from General Secretary and sent to handle a local community in the Far East, his political prospects all but destroyed. Meanwhile, Trotsky was denounced as someone who was too unstable and unsuitable for leadership. While this did not have immediate effects on him, his power in the Politburo diminished, and was eventually kicked out of the governing body and simply became a regular Central Committee member. Zinoviev and Kamenev emerged unscathed from the Testament, opting to stay below the radar as Stalin and Trotsky fell from power, but eventually, Zinoviev would then solidly lead the center-left faction after Lenin's death, and Kamenev was the leader of the centrist bloc in the Communist Party, strong though certainly not in the majority. Meanwhile, the Right was to gain the most out of the Testament. As a result of the collapse of the Stalinist faction and the weakening of the Trotskyist Left, Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky became extremely influential, as in the leadup to the Testament, they were able to befriend Lenin and gain a favourable review from the esteemed Soviet leader [2].



    msbMfSULVz3tRXn80ECCBXrMwkrLWb2cFye9MVG0sLqiGW-uR8zew3sFmW0vc52_cxL33cL_0aV4yct4zYdQ7ILy7JdNdnvsqRdwAYR_r_4o-TMlCla_jMoiWY24Hiv6VBwPBeNf
    M0XAFz1kH0WI7do2sG0Rnyz9MGE6EJIVubnZg1_pdVq-ColHX1CWmIOwe31aVP3dqwfoVkVtMltnrpdhgqsQLhYl8Bv2reLDi3RRx_QcUBqCvrmeRDalff2HSyPaTUEGrLWe92c3
    beDwDO8O42aMiQLTX3QMqXhYu1x_to1xanFHWOpmVG7cDTKNHwzmWOOhBUAilr09yRbWckdNrkkt6RdOBCypv-nrDTaCBKPPDLd6EaBxyzI2tNuB5_w-2si4vuBC-vXWlodBIldu

    The troika that led the Soviet Union after Lenin’s death from left to right: NIkolai Bukharin, Alexei Rykov, and Mikhail Tomsky.


    By the 13th Congress, the fallout of Lenin’s Testament was clear. In the 100-member expanded Central Committee, the Stalinists were kicked out, and the Trotskyist Left only amounted to 10 members, the Zinovievite Center-Left had 18 members, and the Right led by Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky constituted a plurality of the Central Committee with 40 members. The moderates, which were composed mostly of new-blooded Communists (as Lenin wanted new Committee members to be of new blood), had 32 members. While this faction was disparate, it was de facto led by Kamenev, who gave considerable support to the Right faction.

    The effects of the Testament and the Stalinist fall from power was also reflected in the policies enacted soon afterwards. Two bureaucratic changes made at this time, also in line with Lenin's Testament. Firstly, the Bureau of Inspection was created from some of the best members of the Workers' and Peasants' Inspection, to assist in the administrative functions of the Soviet state. Secondly, the State Planning Commission was granted considerable autonomy, thus helping the economy advance at a great pace. On foreign policy, isolationism reigned supreme, something the Right and Stalin agreed upon while he was still in the Committee. Lenin’s lenient New Economic Programming, which allowed great autonomy in farming and industry, remained as well. The only issue the Left factions succeeded - in no small part thanks to Lenin's Testament itself - was national autonomy, and the granting of significant autonomy to the member states of the Soviet Union, to prevent Russification and Russian chauvinism. On this, the whole of the Politburo agreed that constituent states must be allowed to develop their own particular socialism [3].

    These policy changes enabled the Soviet Union to soon surpass pre-World War I productivity levels. However, trouble was beginning to arise as gold reserves ran low as the government bought grain at a much higher price than their export price. In this regard, the government reduced its agricultural demand to enable domestic prices to drop to international levels and this led to an increase in the budget surplus and gold reserves. This, however, slowed down industrialization.

    Also, as the 1920s ended, the industrial goods were scarce and their prices extremely high for peasants as the resources were devoted to the industrialisation drive. Afterwards, the Right fought the Left for proposal on how to fix it, but the Right won with a few renegade Centrist members, and the agreement was that industrialisation would have to slow down somewhat so that the production of industrial goods would catch up with demand. By the early 1930s, the prices of industrial goods sufficiently went down, and the industrialisation drive started once more, this time keeping the prices of industrial goods stable.

    Meanwhile, the Soviet Union enacted liberal amendments to its constitution in 1936. Women’s rights were enshrined in the constitution. Inter-party democracy was encouraged, freedom of religion was allowed to gain support from religious Soviets. State-owned enterprises were allowed to set their own priorities, guided by Gosplan to avoid red tape, corruption and other adverse practices. Also, an attempt to include abortion was narrowly struck down by the Right [4].


    -_Lr223RpOFJVEM10ea_cuKN44EXUaUzGWqnbxcBfeT3oQA16e48LwqgVGgjKp_pJSX2LBflh18q4nz7AKsVanO4vmPIH74BpeeLKvB8hP-qJFfXbXrpPXrh_Q3lu7hj0fe-kglK

    General Mikhail Tukachevsky was the young face of a modernizing Soviet Armed Forces.


    Meanwhile in the military, the Soviets were able to slowly build up the Armed Forces. The Army, Navy and Air Force got ample amounts of funds, research and development, and training. Most importantly,military doctrine was modernized with the help of Mikhail Tukachevsky’s “Deep Battle” thought, which was surprisingly similar to the Nazis’ “Blitzkrieg” tactics in terms of mass-mobile warfare. The officer corps were professionalised and removed of corruption and political red tape [5].


    JRWUB6vjoO93EZRmClZqdiBiT5fEP0ct31UDqjdHV0laccWOYOxMmVFgkH5XGvkW1J-riTdPP0hgRgXppK-2-p8blkrYgge5HgC3U4X4JRU9CTUmbd8Ef-igbdmlU8Dc5f3r08gE

    Destroyed Finnish tanks as Soviets enter Helsinki, December 29, 1940


    By the start of World War II, the Soviet Union had a healthy economy and its industry and military, while not as larger as the Party hoped, was growing at an fast pace. This enabled them to win against Finland in the Winter War of 1940, winning the Soviets their second puppet state since they got Mongolia during the Russian Civil War [6].

    However, the Soviet Union still needed more time to develop their Armed Forces to full potential, as by 1940, their industrial and military might was still developing. They needed perhaps until perhaps 1944 to fortify their forces, as any major military engagement before that would crush the infant Red Army. Fortunately for them, the Soviet Union was able to forge a nonaggression pact with Nazi Germany in 1939, and agreed to send natural resources to Nazi Germany, who, in turn, agreed to send them technology and industrial goods in return. This bought them time to strengthen the Soviet Armed Forces, and give them more land, as they finally got the Baltic Republics and Ukrainian and Byelorussian lands expanded, giving the main industrial heartlands of the Soviet Union space in the case of a German invasion. But Soviet Union was spared from such a catastrophe, as that invasion never came as the Nazis got bogged down in Western Europe against the French and British. For the rest of 1941, the Heart of Socialism was relatively peaceful, quietly building their forces up for when they are able to attack a weakened Germany from the East and carve out a puppet state out of the then-fascist nation, and perhaps take Poland and Czechoslovakia with them [7].

    Meanwhile, It was not only the Soviet Union that was heaving sighs of relief as prospects of further Nazi action in other areas of Europe dimmed. As Nazi Germany was forced into a stalemate with the French and British, Hungary, under Regent and dictator Miklos Horthy, was quietly settling its own territorial disputes without getting into war with its neighbors. This enabled them to get the majority-Hungarian areas from occupied Czechoslovakia, but was not able to get more territory from Romania due to Allied support for the latter nation [8]. Afterwards, Hungary remained neutral and focused in modernizing their Armed Forces.


    YjGaKxdqmAPTruGVhtPPQBSWO8i02QFg-82SAmI7foZduLifdwFdQgOtKUgzqS_t46c-sqZEUgTaevu9I7V8nChpl9gFIrv6oS2J9Jq4N2QuwI1jwv4sGH_n8yf72H3Go5nOnw_4

    Regent of Hungary Miklos Horthy managed to modestly expand Hungarian lands without descending to war with its neighbors.


    -kn0JZJ57INDbh2iW8-CGDkzvRx0Zr7tKyG8vPHC-JTsl0akjlgqQ2cX5MhS3FKyX-kRFvLuR25L_5JcNYILk9_N01WHYg7yzwHj3gYEp-N4HFLcYpJ5A4qztKkZNstp_9BoqkX0

    The Soviet takeover of Bessarabia and parts of Bukovina hurt King Carol II’s government’s popularity, but inadvertently push them away from the Axis as the fascists launched a failed coup against him.

    As for Romania, the country, led by its King Carol II, was able to stay stable and remain neutral due to Nazi Germany being occupied in the West and the nation’s historical ties to France. For the meantime, the country was building up its Armed Forces for any armed conflict in the future. However, the Soviets would still be able to get Bessarabia and Bukovina as the socialist nation threatened to invade them in August 1941 and the Allies were unable to intervene due to the major operations ongoing in the Western Front. This hurt Carol II’s and moderates’ standing amongst the Romanian populace, and they were only able to hang on to power due to help from intelligence operatives from the Allies successfully rooting out an attempted fascist Iron Guard coup against them. Soon afterwards, they sharply turned from the Axis and secretly allied themselves with the Allies, but Romania still stayed quiet to avoid any more conflict as the the Second World War brewed.

    In the Balkans, Bulgaria, Greece, and Yugoslavia were relatively peaceful, even if they were dictatorships. Even in Yugoslavia, where ethnic tensions ran the highest, matters were kept well-regulated and no major upheaval occurred during the Second World War.

    Meanwhile, the Iberian peninsula also saw relative stability, as the Franco regime in Spain and the Estado Novo in Portugal rejected any involvement in the Western Front. The regimes only focused on consolidating their power and on improving the economy and military from the Great Depression, quietly waiting for the new world order that awaited after the worst conflict that befell man ended.


    -------------

    [1]. Italy would be in the side of the Allies, as said. I based the idea and wording on Onkel Willie's TL, Stresa Revived.

    [2]. First Soviet POD. Aim: Avoid the Holodomor. Stalin has been forced to the political wilderness ITTL, with interesting butterflies.

    [3]. Without the forced collectivisation, millions of Soviets would be spared from the Holodomor. The two changes are gotten from and inspired by Cyclone's TL By Lenin's Will.

    [4]. The more conservative members of the Central Committee, due to the Right’s power ITTL, block abortion in the Soviet constitution. However, women's rights are still enshrined, and in fact, the Soviet Union ITTL boasts a good women's rights record in the 1930s. Also, the definition of “liberalism” on abortion is different ITTL. We will get to that once we go to the 1960s and 1970s in the future.

    [5]. The stupid Great Purge that gutted the Soviet Army corps doesn't happen without Stalin. This would immensely strengthen the Red Army than IOTL even if they have a smaller industrial base ITTL.

    [6]. Butterflies. Butterflies. Butterflies.

    [7]. The German invasion of the Soviet Union won't happen ITTL. This would really spare 20+ million Soviets from death.

    [8]. IOTL, with the Allies weakened after the Fall of France, their support for Romania extremely weakened as a result, leading to Hungary, which was Axis-aligned, to get territory from Hungary, leading to Ion Antonescu’s dictatorship, who then made them Axis-aligned.


    This is the Western Front Frontlines at the largest German extent:

    nssF4BX.png
     
    Last edited:
    PART XXIV - WORLD WAR II, PACIFIC FRONT, PART I


  • Excerpt from

    The Far East Burning: The War in the Pacific
    By Damian West


    Even before the Second World War started in Europe, Asia was already seeing action, and by the turn of the 1940s, Eastern Asia was also fully embroiled in a bloody war that spanned from the steppes of the Inner Mongol Region to the lush rainforests of Java in Indonesia.


    THE MIDDLE KINGDOM RESISTING: CHINA IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR

    z2TnfOMm.png

    The Warlord Era plagued China from 1916 to 1927.

    For much of the late 1910s and the early 1920s, China was broken into numerous warlord states, with all of these warlord states being basketcases filled with corruption and poverty. But by 1927, the Guomindang under Jiang Jieshi [1] was able to defeat much of the warlords and largely unify China once more.

    RRxmatom.png

    Generalissimo Jiang Jieshi was able to defeat the Chinese Communists and unify China under the Guomindang in time for the Second Sino-Japanese War


    However, the brief Chinese Civil War started between the Guomindang and the Communist Party of China (CPC) when the Guomindang government in Wuhan expelled and suppressed all communists and the Communists took over the city of Nanchang. This threatened to split China once more, but the CPC was forced to conduct the Long March in 1934 after numerous defeats from the Guomindang, but by then, many of the Communist Party’s leaders and soldiers died off due to starvation and disease, and the Guomindang finally defeated the CPC by 1935. The Guomindang’s power was finally uncontested, but soon, a foreign power would attack China and test her resolve: Japan. With the onset of the Great Depression and even before it, militarists took power in Japan and ended the fragile “Taisho Democracy”, setting Japan towards the path of militarization, culminating in the Japanese takeover of Manchuria and some other and near it. Finally, by 1937, after the Marco Polo Bridge Incident, the Second Sino-Japanese War commenced.

    TCWeVAgm.png

    The Nanjing Massacre and other anti-Chinese atrocities emboldened China to achieve victory against Japan at all costs.

    China was plagued by a corrupt officer corps, a horrid economy, and a discontented population, and the cutting off of supply lines with the capturing of many Chinese port cities. However, China was able to put a great fight against the Japanese. This had the effect of bleeding out Japanese forces that otherwise would have been sent elsewhere, and with the knowledge of Japanese atrocities such as the Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, the “comfort women” and others, Chinese morale to defeat the Japanese at all costs heightened, and with aid from the British and French, was able to continue fighting.



    THE RISING SUN INSURGENT: THE EMPIRE OF JAPAN IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR

    ZAxyrofm.png

    The Attack on Pearl Harbor on April 29, 1942 precipitated US entry into the Pacific Theater of the Second World War.

    As the war in China raged on, Japan, under militarist Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, was already running low on resources. Materials that came out of Manchukuo, Taiwan, and Korea were not enough, and they had to look elsewhere. Also, the Chinese were being supplied by the British and French in secret, although aid tapered off somewhat when the Nazis invaded Western Europe in May 1940. By the end of that year, Japanese reserves were running dangerously low, and they did not want the Chinese to become stronger than them. Hence, in January 1941, the Japanese invaded Indochina, and thus went to war with the Allies. The French colony put up a fight, but surrendered on March 23, 1941, as the French were not able to defend their colony given the bloody battles in Northern France and Western Belgium.

    lBiTBwAm.png

    The Japanese occupation of Indochina forced the Americans to put an oil embargo that led to Japan attacking Pearl Harbor.

    The invasion of Indochina brought more good than harm to Japan. Soon afterward, the United States imposed an oil embargo in Japan in response to the greater Japanese aggression, starving it even more of resources to continue their war effort in Eastern Asia, as oil supplies would only last two years if the United States continued with the embargo. The only way to get past that dilemma was to invade the Dutch East Indies but to get there, but they had to knock the Americans out of the war and take the Philippines, Guam and other American territories, too. Therefore, on April 29, 1942, the attack on Pearl Harbor commenced. It was a pure disaster for the Americans. 2,335 people, many of them soldiers, were killed, while 1,143 wounded. There were four battleships sunk, four battleships damaged, one ex-battleship sunk, one harbor tug sunk, three cruisers damaged, three destroyers damaged, three other ships damaged, 188 aircraft destroyed, and 159 aircraft damaged. The attack on Pearl Harbor directly precipitated the entry of the United States into the Second World War. A day after the aggression, the United States declared war on Japan, and the Pacific Theater opened up.

    d0PZdHBm.png

    The Bataan Death March, September 9, 1942

    As the United States started to prepare for the large war with Japan, the Japanese were able to gain more ground in China, invade the Philippines and invade much of Southeast Asia, save for Burma, in a span of a few months. The Allies were forced to conduct guerilla campaigns in occupied territories and evacuate their main leadership south to Australia. The Japanese seemed to experience victory after victory, and they were not about to stop. This was signified by the Bataan Death March on September 9, 1942 [2], in which around 80,000 soldiers were forced to march Mariveles, Bataan and Bagac, Bataan to Capas, Tarlac. It signified defeated Allied forces in the face of the evil of the Japanese in their invasion, which encouraged the Allies to strengthen their resolve and defeat Japan at all costs.






    Excerpt from

    The Arsenal of Democracy: America in the Second World War
    By Angela Davis


    “April 29th, 1942, a date which will live in infamy…”
    -President Franklin Roosevelt declaring war on Japan, April 30, 1942

    Meanwhile, on the home front, the United States was beginning to channel its entire economy and population to the war effort. But the preparations would not have been complete without some major social reforms that would encourage Americans from all walks of life to participate and precipitate America's and the Allies' victory in the Second World War.

    FALLING TO RISE BACK UP: THE INITIAL AMERICAN DEFEATS IN 1942

    g70yyUxm.png

    General Douglas MacArthur giviing his "I Shall Return" speech, August 4, 1942

    The United States declared war on Japan on April 30, 1942. American forces soon mobilized on war footing, and much of the economy soon focused on war production. However, Asia was too far away and their forces so far were stretched thin, so they had to abandon the Philippines, Guam and other areas to the Japanese. Philippine President Manuel Quezon and the Philippine Commonwealth Government was evacuated to Australia and then to Washington, D.C. soon afterwards, General Douglas McArthur’s United States Armed Forces in the Far East (USAFFE) were annihilated and bested by the Japanese, but took a last stand at Corregidor. However, Corregidor also fell. Soon afterward, the Japanese took over Guam, Malaya, the entire Dutch East Indies, and eventually made their way to Midway, where, fortunately for the American war effort, they were defeated.

    Meanwhile, McArthur, to avoid Japanese capture, was also forced to evacuate to Australia on August 4, 1942, where he gave his famous “I Shall Return” speech, which greatly bolstered the morale of Allied war effort in the Pacific, giving them hope even with the numerous defeats the Americans received. In the end, the message was that Japan way be winning in 1942, but the United States will rise again soon.



    THE STING OF DEFEAT: DEMOCRATS LOSE SEATS IN 1942

    The numerous American defeats in 1942 soured public opinion against President Franklin Roosevelt and the Democrats, resulting in the Republicans gaining many seats in Congress, but, given the large Democratic supermajorities in Congress, this was barely a dent on his power. This enabled Republicans to recover somewhat from the nadir they experienced during the 1930s, and reassert their status as the foremost opposition party to the Democrats.

    uKEK5a9.png


    tuIgzkG.png

    Soon after the Republican wave, President Roosevelt vowed to ramp up the war effort and defeat Japan as soon as possible. In the meantime, the Americans were working on something that could perhaps help them win the war faster.



    NUCLEAR VICTORY? THE CREATION OF THE ATOMIC BOMB

    N3wUJFXm.png
    9lDLQyHm.png
    J3KWmdjm.png

    From left to right: scientists Albert Einstein, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Leo Szilard. These men and other scientists worked to create the atomic bomb for the Allies.

    As soon as the Second World War in Europe started, the American government fast-tracked the creation of the atomic bomb via the Manhattan Project. Scientists such as Albert Einstein [3], J. Robert Oppenheimer, Leo Slizard, worked round the clock to make the bomb operable as soon as possible and use it against Japan, and perhaps Nazi Germany, depending on whether Germany is still standing when the bomb becomes ready for military service. President Roosevelt also wanted to hasten the building of the atomic bomb since he thought that if Japan and Germany lost quickly, they could perhaps force these two countries to surrender to the Allies instead of the Soviet Union, as they expected the socialist state to enter the war sometime in mid-1943 or early 1944.

    Therefore, besides the great funding the Manhattan Project received in the 1939 budget, it got another budget boost by around two billion dollars in 1943. Einstein told Roosevelt that the bomb, at the current rate of government investment and research by the scientists, the bomb could be complete by 1944. Whether that would happen remained to be seen by that time.



    STRONGER TOGETHER: THE DESEGREGATION OF THE ARMED FORCES

    EIjssJKm.png

    President Roosevelt desegregated the US Military in 1942.

    On the other hand, the war effort also served to bolster civil rights for minorities and women’s rights. On October 19, 1942, President Franklin Roosevelt desegregated the Armed Forces through an executive order. This greatly promoted the image of blacks and other minorities amongst the American electorate, that African-Americans and other minorities can just be as skilled and ready for combat as White people. This also fostered huge hotspot of cultural and racial openness amongst servicepeople [4].

    Lwf0eIXm.png

    Doris Miller (1919-2020) was the face of the minority emancipation in the American military.

    As a result, many minorities, especially African-Americans, were able to become valiant soldiers during the War. The most well-known examples include was Doris Miller, who became a soldier and airman aboard the USS West Virginia [5], and eventually received the Presidential and American Medals of Honor. The desegregation of the Armed Forces showed that people of color can rise up to the challenge and become brave and successful soldiers in the war, and , if given the chance, can be as successful as Whites in any societal role.

    SzDsTw9.png
    f7JT4Q0b.png

    The actions of Dorothy Rodham (left, 1919-2020) and Jane Watson (1918-2014) led to women being allowed to enter the United States Military by the end of 1942.

    Finally, women were originally relegated to nursing and other frontline occupations that were “meant” for women, but given the heavy situation with the Japanese, it was inevitable that many women would be in combat positions in the Pacific. There were three notable examples: with Jane Watson [6] defending her group of nurses from bayonetting Japanese soldiers with a small knife and a gun at Mariveles, Bataan, and Dorotha Howell Rodham [7] eventually forces to man an anti-aircraft gun and shooting down 30 Japanese fighter aircraft. Both women's action gained widespread praise from the American public, and showed the fact that women are skilled in combat, and that in war, they were eventually going to be in combat positions whether people liked it or not. They were eventually given the Presidential Medal of Honor and the American Medal of Honor, and their actions led to the Equitable Military Service Act (EMSA) on December 9, 1942, which mandated the desegregation of the Armed Forces and allowed for conscription of any American regardless of race, sex, religion, or national origin. It was the most significant piece of civil rights legislation since Reconstruction and enabled all Americans of all walks of life to enter the military. Given Roosevelt’s popularity and the “rally behind the flag” effect, the President, along with liberal Democrats and Republicans, passing 68-32 in the Senate on December 10 and 234-201 in the House on December 14, with Northern Democrats and Republicans banded together to pass the bill, and was signed by President Roosevelt on January 2, 1943.

    iGgkswWm.png
    ZlgOTICm.png

    Women, whether African-American (left) or White (right), were eventually enlisted in droves in the US Military in the Second World War.
    After the EMSA, many states, especially in the South, were reluctant to draft women given that the EMSA did not mandate any gender quota in conscription, but were eventually compelled to draft many women into the military as many women came in droves to become soldiers. This eventually helped promote women’s rights, greatly weakening the concept of women being damsels in distress. It also greatly weakened the idea of women being relegated to being housewives and being weak for major roles such as being soldiers, greatly empowering many women in the process.

    TSjrS4sm.png

    The post-war Women's Rights Movement was bolstered by the strong-woman reputation American women got from fighting during the Second World War.

    This resulted in a cultural phenomenon that ended with many women being hired in the home front to work in factories, enter schools, and other areas for the war effort, something many women continued to do so even after the Second World War ended. The integration of peoples of color and women to the military was greatly documented and publicized after the war, the most famous being (Name of Movie) that featured (men and women said above). The integration was also immortalized in fictional media, with the most famous example being Marvel’s Captain America in 2009, which featured the multiracial and gender-balanced Howling Commandos that included African-American, Asian, and Latino women, alongside white members, which included Captain America himself, Bucky Barnes and Peggy Carter.


    --------------------------------

    [1]. China still switches to Hanyu Pinyin as IOTL.

    [2]. IOTL, it was April 9, 1942.

    [3]. IOTL, Einstein was denied entry to the Manhattan Project because of his left-leaning thinking. ITTL, with the Democratic supermajority pushing the United States even further to the left (though not communist left), this won't happen.

    [4]. IOTL, the desegregation happened in 1947 after WWII. With people of color able to serve in the United States Armed Forces with Whites, race relations would be better ITTL.

    [5]. I based this example on this TL as my inspiration.

    [6]. Fictional name. Her picture to the right of Hillary Clinton's mother is from another OTL woman, but I used it for this fictional woman ITTL.

    [7]. This is Hillary Clinton's mother.
     
    Last edited:
    PART XXV - THE ALLIED TURNING POINT
  • CHAPTER III - WORLD WAR II

    PART IV - THE ALLIED TURNING POINT




    Excerpt from

    Destroying Swastikas
    By Nicholas Steinfield


    1942. It had been almost three years since the War in Europe started, but the war was not finished yet. Both the Allies and Nazi Germany wanted to break through each other and finally end this stalemate. Only time would tell if either one of them are able to do so.


    THE ALPINE STRUGGLE: ITALY VS. GERMANY IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR


    For much of 1940 and 1941, the Germans had focused on finally beating the French and British in the Western Front, so the Alpine Front saw little movement during the time. But the stalemates in the bloody Second Battle of Sedan and the meatgrinders at the Lille-Abbeville-Amiens Triangle, Ostend, and the Compiegne-Soissons-Maubeuge Triangle forced them to halt their offensives in those areas, and instead knock out the weaker Italians out of the war and force the Allies to divert troops and equipment there, as the Alpine Front had sucked some vital resources for the Western Front.

    wYERZ1V.png

    Fall Blau marker. Black indicates the initial offensive to Trento, Belluno and Udine, blue indicates the Nazi pincer that cut of the Italians from June to July 1942

    Finally, the Germans launched Fall Blau [1] on April 19, 1942, when the weather became surprisingly clear, completely surprising the Allies as they thought the Nazis would focus their main attack in Western Europe. Germany launched multiple offensives aimed at the towns of Merano, Cortina d’Ampezzo, and Germona to make way for further offensives to give major road links to Trento, Belluno, and Udine. The three towns were located in Alpine territory, which was hostile ground for Bltizkrieg-style warfare that was heavily implemented in the Western Front. However, the offensive succeeded, and Italian forces were compelled to move farther to the south to Trento, Belluno and Udine in a disorganized and panicky manner, leading to a horrible Italian defense of the three towns that ended in decisive Italian defeat. But this allowed the Italians to trade space for time further south.

    This put the Italians in an untenable position in Northeastern Italy. With Trento, Belluno, and Udine captured, Nazi offensives that can cut off Venice and Trieste can now be conducted, especially with Rovereto falling to the Nazis on June 29, 1942. Therefore, the Italians piled defenses at the towns of Vicenza and Udine to prevent the Germans from advancing. Their assumptions proved to be disastrously false, as went even farther to the west and instead captured Verona before reaching the Adriatic Sea at Chioggia on July 1. Further to the east, instead of pushing towards Udine, the Nazis followed the River Tagliamento and surrounded Italian forces when they reached the mouth of the river a day later.

    kdBTbfP.png

    The July 26 evacuation at Trieste

    In the process, the Nazis cut off a tenth of the Italian Armed Forces and heavily damaged another tenth with aerial bombardments. 343,000 troops were surrounded just outside of Venice and in the city of Trieste. Seeing no chance of breaking out, the Italians were forced to conduct the famous July 26 evacuation. The operation was an immense success, as around 302,193 Italian troops were able to be evacuated southward, and much of Venice and Trieste’s civilian population were evacuated as well with the help of Allied ships to the port towns of Rimini and Ravenna.

    To boost Italian and Allied morale after the Nazi breakthrough in early July, dictator Benito Mussolini delivered his “we shall fight in the mountains” speech [2], saying, “even if the murderous Nazi brigands were to subjugate a large part of our country and burn it to the ground, we will fight everywhere, we will not stop until we snatch victory right from the bloodied hands of the Nazi maniacs, and take the fight to their land, and with the help of our French and British allies, achieve a new order in Europe, a peace that will last for a thousand years!”

    But, however, speeches are inspiring and miracles like the July 26 evacuation are uplifting, this did not stop whatsoever the German advance into Italy. As a result, the Nazi Germans were able to march towards Bologna and besiege Milan and Ravenna by August 14. Victory in these battles were of utmost priority for the Italians, because if Milan was captured, it would enable the Nazis to reach Genoa and thus cut off mainland France from mainland Italy, and if they took Bologna and Ravenna, nothing would stop the Germans from march along the eastern coast of Italy and from marching towards Florence and San Marino, thus giving them a major road towards Rome.

    UI9UCWRm.png

    Italian soliders preparing for the Siege of Milan, August 14, 1942

    In the Sieges of Milan, Bologna and Ravenna, 1,500,000 troops from both sides, 1,500 tanks, 1,000 aircraft, 4,500 tanks, 3,000 artillery pieces and 1,400 anti-aircraft batteries were used in one of the largest battles in Italian history. Fortunately for this bloody battle, the civilian populations of the three cities were evacuated southward to avoid capture by the Nazis. The Nazis were able to reach the outskirts of the three cities by mid-September 1942. Then the close-quarters combat commenced. Italians and Nazis fought block by block to gain victory in the cities. Both sides poured many reinforcements, and much of the structures inside Milan, Bologna and Ravenna were destroyed by the house-to-house fighting and aerial bombardments from both sides.

    But by mid-October 1942, the front lines had stagnated, but the Allies were beginning to see an opening to crush the Nazis. The Germans were concentrating too much forces into the three cities that forced their rear defenses to be stretched too thin, as they were also holding their ground in Western Europe. This enabled Italy to launch Operation Mercury, a front-wide counteroffensive aimed at encircling the Germans in Milan, Bologna, and Ravenna that involved 700,000 Italian troops, 1,000 aircraft, 3,000 tanks, 2,000 artillery pieces, and 1,000 anti-aircraft batteries, on October 14, 1942. Although Nazi forces were able to repel the first attacks, by October 19, the German forces were forced to retreat. German mobile reserves were not enough to fight off the Italians and were not able to fortify themselves against the Italians. On October 28, Italian forces surrounded Milan and met at the city of Bergamo. On October 29, Italian forces were able to take back the city of Ferrara and reach the port town of Commacchio to the north of Ravenna and secure their lines by taking back Modena and Cremona.

    YFskPowm.png

    German soldiers surrendering to the Allies in Bologna, March 5, 1943

    In the process, 202,103 Nazi troops and much equipment were encircled, and Mercury was branded as a major success for the Allied war effort. Afterward, Hitler refused to order a breakout of the besieged German forces and instead supplied them by air, which was successful, as the trapped forces were able to meet 85% of their daily needs. However, allied air power shot down many cargo aircraft and forced the trapped Germans to ration their resources even more. The Italians were able to cut off the Bologna and Ravenna pockets from each other and started to reduce the three surrounded German armies: The Sixth in Milan, The Ninth in Bologna, and The 14th in Ravenna. The surrounded troops would hold on for the next four months, but eventually, their resources would finally run out. On March 4, 1943, the Milan, Bologna, and Ravenna pockets finally crumbled and the German troops surrendered in a major triumph for the Allies.

    EvFy3q4m.png

    Frontlines by August 1942. North of the blue line indicates Nazi ground, while south means Italian ground.

    As a result of German forces being weakened by Operation Mercury, the Italians then launched Operation Umberto from April 2 to take back Brescia, Mantua, Verona and Rovigo, which largely routed the disorganized German armies and forced them to retreat to the twin Chioggio-Padua salients. In the Chioggio-Padua salient, the Italians and Nazi Germans invested 700,000 troops, 1,500 aircraft, 2,800 tanks, 3,000 artillery pieces, and 1,700 anti-aircraft batteries to gain control of the city. However, the battle turned into a meatgrinder by August stalemate that no side won.

    For now, the Allies were able to prevent a general collapse of the Italian front lines and hold their ground in Western France. With more supplies coming from their colonies and from the American Lend-Lease program, and with Soviet resources to Germany tapering off as the Soviets prepared to go to war with Nazi Germany and weakening the Axis state even further, time was on the Allies’ side, and the tide in Europe was finally beginning to turn in their favor.




    Excerpt from
    The Arsenal of Democracy: America in the Second World War
    By Angela Davis


    In the Pacific Front, the Allies were also beginning to push back against the Japanese after their major defeats in Southeast Asia and China. The Doolittle Raid exposed the weaknesses of Japanese homeland defenses. Nevertheless, a clear victory, not a purely moral one, was needed.



    A SHOT IN THE ARM: THE DOOLITLE RAID

    SyQWZeWm.png

    B-25 bombers leaving for the Doolittle Raid, November 2, 1942

    The Doolittle Raid, also known as the Tokyo Raid, on Saturday, November 2, 1942, was an air raid by the United States on the Japanese capital Tokyo and other places on the island of Honshu during World War II, the first air operation to strike the Japanese Home Islands. It demonstrated that the Japanese mainland was vulnerable to American air attack. Lieutenant Colonel James "Jimmy" Doolittle led the attack, and not only was it a success but also, all of Doolittle’s aircraft safely returned to unoccupied parts of China. One landed in the Soviet city of Vladivostok, and its occupants were arrested by Soviet officers, but were eventually released after negotiations between the American and Soviet governments on December 19,. [3] The Raid was a big morale booster for the Allies, and served to boost their war effort against Japan. It also promoted Doolittle two ranks up to brigadier general, and the soldiers who participated in the raid were also promoted.


    BURMA: THE TURNING POINT


    From Indochina to the Philippines to Malaya and to the Dutch East Indies, the Allies saw their territories collapse to the Japanese one by one. The Doolittle Raid boosted morale, and the Allies desperately wanted a solid victory, and they received it in Burma.

    4dNkhdnm.png

    The Arcadia Conference, May 17, 1942

    On May 17, 1942, France, Britain and the United States met together to discuss war plans in the Pacific in the period 1942-1943 in the Arcadia Conference in Washington, D.C. The decision was for the United States to declare war against Nazi Germany. It also established the Combined Chiefs of Staff, headquartered in Washington, which approved and finalized all military decisions. The conference also created a unified American-British-French-Dutch-Australian Command (AFBDA) in the Far East, which included Burma, to US Secretary of State George Marshall’s insistence [4]. Burma also got its own command structure separate from British India, which was led by Field Marshal Harold Alexander [5]. Finally, the conference drafted the Declaration by the United Nations, which committed the Allies to make no separate peace with the enemy, and to employ full resources until victory was achieved.

    nXPQBv7m.png

    Japanese artillerymen during the invasion of Burma, May 17, 1942

    On May 17, 1942, the Japanese began their invasion of Burma. Field Marshal Alexander ordered British forces and French forces from Indochina to retreat to the Sittang River defenses and prevent the Japanese from establishing a bridgehead there. Burma’s rugged terrain slowed the Japanese advance, and by July 28, 1942, the offensive had been stopped, and with the monsoon rains in Burma coming and with more British counteroffensives pushing back the enemy, the Allies were able to prevent Burma from falling by the end of 1942, and with naval and army reinforcements coming, they were able to repel a Japanese amphibious landing to the South of Pathein on September 9, 1942, and fortify their forces even more. As a result, Jiang Jieshi’s China got more resources and was able to halt some Japanese offensives heading into 1943 and 1944, and Japanese forces were bogged down in Burma with no hope of breaking through the front lines. The Japanese failure to take Burma also had some effects in other parts of the Pacific Front. The Burma front sucked resources from the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) in the battles of Midway, Guadalcanal, and Wake Island [6]. Afterward, Japanese land forces continued to advance in the Solomon Islands and New Guinea. From December 1942, the First and Second Australian Imperial Forces, helped by forces from Britain’s and France’s African colonies and British India, were able to repel Japanese forces from New Guinea altogether and with the help from the United States Navy, they were able to defeat the Japanese at Guadalcanal and the Solomon Islands, only putting out Japanese insurgents until the war ended [7].

    ouXQLAwm.png

    Admiral Chester Nimitz's Island-Hopping Campaign became much more possible after the Allies' succes in Burma.


    From Burma onwards, the Allies were able to begin their island-hopping campaign under Admiral Chester Nimitz and were able to halt some Japanese offensives into China. In the battles of Changde and Zhejiang-Guangxi, the Chinese were able to hold off the Japanese and prevent the Doolittle airmen from getting killed [8]. They were also able to sink many Japanese resource ships that prevented the IJN from preventing future Allied invasions of occupied islands through a naval attack. In the Battle of Tarawa, in March 1943, the Allies were victorious but the Allies had to improve the techniques of amphibious landings, learn from their mistakes and implement changes such as thorough pre-emptive bombings and bombardment. They also had to be more careful in planning regarding tides and landing craft schedules, and better overall coordination. Nevertheless, the tide in the Pacific, from the successful Allied defense of Burma, was turning in favor of the Allies [9].




    --------------------------------


    [1]. IOTL, it was the name for the German offensive to Stalingrad. As has been said, Nazi Germany won’t be invading the Soviet Union ITTL.

    [2]. A reference to PM Winston Churchill’s “we shall fight on the beaches” speech, which does not happen ITTL as Churchill would have a different speech since France does not fall to the Nazis.

    [3]. Butterflies. IOTL, almost all of Doolittle’s aircraft crashed. Only one landed in the Soviet Union. ITTL, with the Soviet Union not in the Pacific Theater and maintaining neutrality in Second World War for now, the aircraft’s occupants would be arrested, but they would still be returned.

    [4]. They didn’t include Burma IOTL.

    [5]. This happens because of no. 3. Nos. 3 and 4 are based on this thread: AHC/WI: Japanese loss in Invasion of Burma

    [6]. This is essentially IOTL but move forward by around five months, but I bet on historians ITTL claiming that the failure to conquer Burma sucked some IJN strength for the three battles. But the point has truth to it though, as some landing materials and ships that would have been used for Midway, Wake and Guadalcanal that were used on TTL’s Japanese amphibious landing at Pathein got destroyed in Burma.

    [7]. The Second Australian Imperial Forces IOTL were just arriving from the Mediterranean Theater in the first half of 1942. ITTL, with the French and British in a stronger position, they are in Australia instead and are able to fight off the Japanese better in New Guinea.

    [8]. IOTL, the Doolittle airmen were mostly killed.

    [9.] Burma would be seen as the Allied tipping point instead of Midway.



    Apologies for the later update; my schedule became too packed yesterday. Also, the next update will detail on guerrillas in WWII.
     
    PART XXVI - THE ENDGAME IN EUROPE
  • CHAPTER III - WORLD WAR II

    PART VI - THE ENDGAME IN EUROPE



    Excerpt from

    Destroying Swastikas
    By Nicholas Steinfield

    The breakthrough finally came to the European Allied troops by 1943. For three years, the French-British were only holding their ground in Northwestern France and Western Belgium, while the Italians were bogging down the Nazis at the Chioggio-Padua salient after Fall Blau failed. While they have ensured the Germans would not be able to make any significant gains into their territory, they needed to crush the Germans and take the fight to their ground.

    EF3JLWwm.png

    Allied troops and tanks commence Operation Overlord, June 6, 1943

    And so with 2,500,000 troops, 4,000 tanks, 140,000 vehicles, 6300 aircraft, 1,850 artillery pieces, and 600 rubber boats, the Allies launched Operation Overlord on June 6, 1943. They would first launch an offensive aimed at breaking the German defenses at Compiegne and Soissons, aiming to surround overextended Nazi forces there. The Allies were able to make the position of the Germans untenable, forcing them to retreat from the salient to Saint-Quentin. At the same time, they surrounded 30,000 German troops at Lille, heavily damaged the Nazis to the west of Ostend, and entered Dutch soil for the first time. They stopped at the Scheldt bridgehead to avoid overstretching themselves but bombarded the Germans at Antwerp to soften it for an impending Allied invasion.

    5F17pICm.png

    British and French bombers during the Freedom Raids, which tipped air superiority in favor of the Allies

    At the same time, the British and French Air Forces conducted the "Freedom Raids" from July 18 to August 4. Using 300 bombers across Northwestern Europe and Northeastern Italy, the Allies were able to destroy 50 Nazi air bases, 50,000 troops, and 600 aircraft in the process. This was the largest bombing aimed at military assets during Overlord, and in the process, the Allies were able to dominate the skies until the end of the war, as since 1939, they were roughly tied with the Nazis in air power. But after the Freedom Raid, the Germans were even pushed further to play defense until the end of the war in Europe.

    IR3j8srm.png

    Surrounded Nazi troops at Sedan surrender to the Allies, September 1, 1943

    Meanwhile, they pushed back the Germans as far as Valenciennes by July 14, eventually laying waste to German defenses at Saint-Quentin and retreating German forces, which the Germans were forced to abandon by the end of the month. Finally, the Siege of Charleville-Sedan occurred, and the Germans invested many resources in defending their lines there, causing heavy casualties. The Siege would last for more than a month and would result in more than 150,000 casualties, but the Allies were able to break through and devastate German forces there on the back of massive Allied air power, eventually surrounding 300,000 troops at Charleville-Mezieres and Sedan in a humiliating defeat for the Nazis, and they surrendered on September 1. The Allies were able to push towards Maubeuge, and finally, by September 13, the Germans were finally pushed out of French soil in a major victory for the French and British. Afterward, the Allies liberated Luxembourg City on September 29, Brussels on October 6, and finally Amsterdam by October 19.

    eeVP5HOm.png

    Italian troops march towards the frontline for Operation Roma, June 11, 1943

    The Italians, with help from British Expeditionary Forces (BEF), also launched Operation Roma four days after Overlord on June 10. The Italians first surrounded 20,000 Nazi troops at Chioggia and was only 40 miles away from Venice. They also bombarded the Germans at Vicenza and took it back by June 29, and in the famous June 18 raid, they were able to hunt down and destroy 10 Nazi air bases and destroy at least 300 aircraft, heavily diminishing the Nazis’ air power even before the Freedom Raid. They finally laid siege to Padua, and the Nazis’ refusal to vacate the salient caused disaster for the enemy, surrounding many Nazi forces inside the city. They would all surrender by August 25.

    AGjAN3Nm.jpg

    Italian and British troops and equipment land at Venice, September 1, 1943

    Now, by mid-August, the Germans were reinforcing their forces near the frontlines as they were expecting a direct British-Italian advance, but they were caught by surprise when instead the Allies launched an amphibious landing at Venice on September 1, which decimated German forces at the frontlines just north of Padua. Afterward, the offensives were easily made, and the Germans were pushed out of Italy’s plains and into the mountains, where Italians and Germans engaged in Alpine warfare heading into the winter.

    MpR2xQIm.png

    Victorious Soviet troops enter Warsaw after declaring war on Nazi Germany, July 4, 1944

    Afterward, the Soviets came. Ever since the War started in Europe, the Soviets under Nikolai Bukharin, Alexei Rykov and Mikhail Tomsky refused to intervene in Eastern Europe, as they were busy expanding the Soviet economy and the Red Army, but that neutral stance would not last for long, as they were planning on invading Nazi Germany by 1944. Listening to pleas from the Allies who had regained their strength over the course of the winter and spring (as precipitation was heavy during those times), the Soviet Union initiated Operation Bagration and invaded Nazi Germany from the east on June 22, 1944, catching them by surprise as they thought the Soviet Union was not going to invade them anytime soon (their racism made them think the “untermensch” of the USSR was incompetent and undisciplined even as the Soviets expanded their military and economic strength). Using military strength nearly identical to the Allies’ when they initiated Operation Overlord, the Soviets were able to destroy the Nazi Fourth Army, along with most of the Third Panzer and Ninth Armies. The Red Army exploited the collapse of the German front line to encircle German formations in the vicinity of Warsaw and destroy them, with Warsaw liberated on July 4.


    Encountering little to no resistance in Eastern Europe, the Soviets were able to push into Slovakia by July 19 and liberated Bratislava by August 1, 1944. The Italians pushed further into Austrian ground as the Allies captured the Rhineland by August 9. From then on, it was an Allied-Soviet competition to capture Berlin, and the eventual winner was the Soviets, which reached the German capital on August 25 as the Allies captured West Germany and Austria. Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler shot himself in the head on August 27 as the Battle of Berlin commenced, and his day-long wife Eva Braun and much of the top brass of the Nazi leadership committed suicide as well. Finally, the Nazis surrendered to the Allied-Soviet forces on September 1.

    hzYEJI2m.png

    General Alfred Jodl signing the unconditional surrender of both east and west forces in Reims, France, September 1, 1944

    Finally, five years to the day it started, the Second World War in Europe ended. A great sigh of relief descended upon the Allied nations. Europe was finally at peace again.

    The Second World War in Europe was the worst military conflict in the history of the continent. 25 million people were killed and another 20 million were wounded. Out of the countries that participated in the war, Austria, Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and Poland lost a combined third of their national economy to the war. Only the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union saw their economies grow during the five-year battle in Europe. Europe was also divided into Allied and Soviet spheres, directly resulting into the Cold War between the Western powers and the communist world led by the Soviet Union.

    But war still brewed in the Far East as the Imperial Japanese Forces refused to surrender to them. And so they diverted their forces instead to the area, preparing for a final push that will defeat the Japanese once and for all.
     
    Last edited:
    PART XXVII - THE ENDGAME IN ASIA
  • CHAPTER III - WORLD WAR II

    PART VI - THE ENDGAME IN EUROPE



    Excerpt from

    The Far East Burning: The War in the Pacific
    By Damian West


    8MkHdXtm.png

    The Allies' "island hopping" plan from 1943 until 1945

    By the end of 1943, the Allies in Asia had gained much ground against the Imperial Japanese. All islands nearest to the International Date Line that the Japanese occupied were liberated by September 1. The Northern Marianas and Saipan were liberated on December 7, 1943, and the Japanese was locked out of the Pacific Ocean south of the Equator. Guam and Tinian Island were liberated by January 20, 1944, and many of Japanese warships and submarines, along with many Japanese airplanes, were destroyed by the start of spring in the Battle of the Philippine Sea.

    wkyqchdm.png

    The Battle of Leyte Gulf, the largest naval battle in history, won the Allies air and naval superiority in the Pacific until the end of the war.

    On April 29, 1944, two years after the Pacific War started, the Battle of Leyte Gulf commenced. In the Allied side, 8 fleet carriers 8 light carriers 18 escort carriers 12 battleships 24 cruisers 166 destroyers and destroyer escorts Many PT boats, submarines, many fleet auxiliaries and around 1,500 aircraft participated in the battle, and in the Japanese side, 1 fleet carrier 3 light carriers 9 battleships 14 heavy cruisers 6 light cruisers, at least 35 destroyers and at least 300 aircraft participated in what was the largest naval battle in history and the largest naval battle during World War II. Leyte Gulf featured the largest battleships ever built and was the last time in history that battleships engaged each other. Kamikaze aircraft first appeared during this time. Many ships were lost and around 15,000 people died in the process, but in the end, the Allies decisively won, and in the process, they gained air and naval superiority in the Pacific until the war ended.

    gz6pbInm.png

    Operation Ichi-Go won Japan some tactical victories but was a strategic failure in the end.

    At the same time, the Japanese were trying to push further into China through Operation Ichi-Go, which was launched on January 11, 1944. The Chinese and Japanese battled each other in the Henan, Hunan and Guangxi provinces, and in the process, more than a million died in the fighting. The Japanese were able to make numerous tactical victories, but stiff Allied resistance, especially with fully-replenished supplies (as the Burma Road was successfully defended against the Japanese in 1942), made the Ichi-Go a long-term strategic failure, as the Chinese did not give up and they were able to make counteroffensives that liberated Wuhan and Changsha.

    OWKn5cdm.png

    Afterward, on June 12, 1944, the campaign to liberate the Philippines began. 12 US Divisions totaling 2,000,000 troops in what was the largest campaign of the Pacific War. The US Sixth Army, supported by naval and air bombardment, landed on the favorable eastern shore of Leyte, north of Mindanao. The US Sixth Army continued its advance from the east, as the Japanese rushed reinforcements to the Ormoc Bay area on the western side of the island. Meanwhile, the US Fifth Air Force was able to devastate the Japanese attempts to resupply. In torrential rains and over difficult terrain, the advance continued across Leyte and the neighboring island of Samar to the north. On 7 December US Army units landed at Ormoc Bay and, after a major land and air battle, cut off the Japanese ability to reinforce and supply Leyte. Although fierce fighting continued on Leyte for months, the US Army was in control. Major landings followed in Bataan, Mindoro, Lingayen Gulf and Corregidor, precipitating a general collapse of Japanese resistance across the country. By August 1, Manila had been liberated, and by September 30, the last of the Philippine Islands had been taken, and in other Southeast Asian occupied territories, the Allies launched the Borneo campaign and retook the island by October 14 and successfully pushed the Japanese out of Burmese land. The rest of the region, however, were ignored to avoid overstretching the Allies.

    Y9dv0NSm.png

    The Allies began to fight Japan on its own soil, with heavy casualties.

    The Allies also took the fight to Japanese soil, although the Allied top brass refused to conduct a full-scale invasion of the Japanese mainland. They first encountered the Japanese at Iwo Jiwa on July 4 in one of the bloodiest battles during the Pacific War, and they won with over 50,000 casualties. They also took the island of Okinawa by September 4, which resulted in more than 200,000 casualties. All these losses, along with heavy Allied bombing of industrial areas that damaged Japan’s industrial capabilities to conduct war, heavily crippled Japanese forces, but they did not produce a Japanese surrender. Allied losses were also becoming unacceptably high. The Allies, in the November 13 Potsdam Declaration led by reelected President Franklin Roosevelt, newly-elected British Prime Minister Clement Attlee, French Prime Minister Paul Reynaud, Chinese Dictator Jiang Jieshi and Soviet Prime Minister Nikolai Bukharin, the Allied powers issued an ultimatum to Japan to surrender or face “prompt and utter destruction”.

    tkF035Um.png

    The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki's importance in ending the Second World War is still up for debate.

    Finally, by mid-1944, the Manhattan Project had already made the United States capable of producing nuclear weapons, and so they were used in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima on December 6 and Nagasaki on December 19. At least 150,000 people were killed in the process, and they destroyed some military installments in the area. The necessity of the atomic bombings has long been debated, with detractors claiming that a naval blockade and aerial bombing campaign had already made invasion, hence the atomic bomb, unnecessary. However, other scholars have argued that the bombings shocked the Japanese government into surrender, with the Emperor finally indicating his wish to stop the war. Another argument in favor of the atomic bombs is that they helped avoid Operation Downfall, or a prolonged blockade and bombing campaign, any of which would have exacted much higher casualties among Japanese civilians. This, along with the Soviet invasion of Manchuria, compelled the Japanese Cabinet to surrender to the Allies, and on Christmas Eve 1944, Emperor Hirohito declared Japan’s surrender to the Allies, and by January 20, 1945, the formal Japanese Instrument of Surrender was signed.

    Yp8yijqm.png

    Imperial Japan officially surrenders to the Allies, January 20, 1945

    That was it. After more than two years of bloodshed, the war in the Pacific was over. Crowds across Asia celebrated as the continent was finally at peace. The Pacific War was the bloodiest in Asian history. More than 25 million people died, and East and Southeast Asia’s economies were left in tatters. Cities such as Manila were among the worst bombed in history, and famine and disease were killing many people who had held out until the end of the war. These showed that much work still had to be done to help Eastern Asia rise again from the ashes.
     
    Last edited:
    PART XXVIII - THE POSTWAR GEOPOLITICAL ALIGNMENTS
  • CHAPTER IV - THE COLD WAR

    PART I - THE POSTWAR GEOPOLITICAL ALIGNMENTS




    Excerpt from

    Marshalling to Recovery: The World After the Second World War
    By Ernest Cambridge

    World War II was the worst conflict in human history. 25 million people were killed and another 20 million were wounded. Many countries which participated in the war, such as Austria, Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and Poland, saw a third of their economy get devastated. China, in particular, lost the most civilians, with around half of the war’s casualties coming from it [1].

    Thus, the victors of the war quickly worked to ensure a stable post-war future for the entire world, and with that, the United Nations was born in 1945, and would serve as the foremost supranational organization that handles international diplomacy. The UN would become much more successful in promoting world peace than its predecessor, the League of Nations, but within it, factionalism still arose, as the world became divided into two groups: The Capitalist West and the Socialist East.

    THE COLD WAR TERRITORIAL CONFLICTS START

    RLhmJbd.png

    The Stockholm Conference among Allied Powers on August 9, 1944

    At the Stockholm Conference [2] on August 9, 1944, the Allies, mainly represented by US President Franklin Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, French Prime Minister Paul Reynauld, Chinese Generalissimo Jiang Jieshi, and Soviet Prime Minister Nikolai Bukharin [3], discussed the status of postwar Europe and Asia. Here, it was all but guaranteed that Europe would be divided into Capitalist and Socialist spheres.

    After World War II, the Allies agreed that Soviet-occupied Finland, Poland and Czechoslovakia (after the Czechoslovaks allegedly voted “yes” in a rigged election to form a socialist government) would fall under the Soviet Union’s control. East Germany and East Berlin would go to the Soviet sphere of influence as well. Meanwhile, West Germany and Austria would go to the Western sphere of influence.

    Meanwhile, in East Asia, there was not much territory the Soviets could get. While Manchuria did fall under the control of the Soviet Union and was placed under the leadership of the Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping as North China, the rest of China, now called South China, was controlled by Jiang Jieshi, and even Xinjiang and Tibet went to China as well in the late 1940s. Korea was put under the leadership of Syngman Rhee, who was ineffective at solving the numerous Korean social woes. In Japan, the LDP rose to power and, for sometime, ruled as its dominant party in the latter half of the 20th century, overseeing its transformation into one of the world's most developed economies over the period [4].

    XqmChk8.png

    American DC-3 planes airlifting supplies to West Berlin, August 9, 1946

    From the territorial divisions would the Cold War would start, with the 1946 Berlin Blockade serving as its spark. At the time, the Soviet Union blocked the Western Allies' railway, road, and canal access to the sectors of Berlin under Western control, and the West responded with a difficult but manageable airlift of supplies to West Berlin, aiming to remove the introduction of the Deutsche mark in the city. However, by the spring of 1947, it was clear that there were more supplies coming from air than there were coming through rail before the blockade, the Soviets ended the standoff. The Berlin Blockade was a defeat for Soviet diplomacy, and it also highlighted the brain drain that was occurring as many Germans fled to West Germany via the city.

    S3AmplA.png

    The Berlin Wall in 1985, a sign of European Cold War divisions that lasted for more than 40 years

    Thus, the Soviets built the most heavily-guarded national border in history, with West Berlin getting hemmed in by East German border walls. The Soviets also built heavily-guarded border walls at the Inner German Border, the Czechoslovak border with Austria, West Germany and Hungary, and the Finnish border with Australia, to send an antagonistic message to the West and to prevent further brain drain to the Western-aligned nations. The efforts were successful, and the Soviets managed to keep many intellectuals in the Socialist sphere and used them for Comintern-related economic and military programs.

    iiMZYImm.png

    The heavily-fortified border between North and South China in 1988

    There were also some border skirmishes between Socialist North China and Nationalist South China, but no war resulted. However, in the atmosphere of fear in the aftermath of the Berlin Blockade, both sides responded with walls in each of the sides of their border.

    8huXs92.png

    The Berlin Blockade precipitated the Second Red Scare that increased West-East tensions.

    The Berlin Blockade precipitated the Second Red Scare in the United States, though the atmosphere of fear was surprisingly less virulent in Western Europe, which was much closer to the Soviets than their transatlantic ally. From 1947, the West became adamantly opposed to the Soviet Union. However, in order to do that, the United States had to bolster its devastated European and Asian allies so that they can also stand on their own and defend themselves against the Soviets.

    YauuKr1.png

    Europe's Cold War divisions by 1960

    ch9VSaG.png

    East Asia's Cold War divisions by 1960

    This geopolitical calculus sorted the West and East into their own alliances. In 1948, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed to counter Soviet military strength in Europe, with the United States, United Kingdom, France, Canada, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Sweden, the Benelux countries, Italy, Yugoslavia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and Portugal [5]. Later on, Greece, West Germany, Cyprus, Turkey, and Spain joined as well. In addition, the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) was formed in 1954, with the United States, France, Britain, the Philippines, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Burma, and Pakistan as its founding members [6]. At first, this organization sought to defeat communist insurgencies in their countries, which they did; afterward the organization went on a path similar to NATO’s to ensure that no insurgencies would happen again. China, Korea and Japan then joined treaty by 1961 and eventually turned the organization into the Asia Treaty Organization (ATO) by 1965 [7]. The Central Treaty Organization (CENTO) was also established between the United States, Britain, Iraq, Iran, Turkey and Pakistan in 1956, joined by more countries in the future, and the Australia-New Zealand-United Kingdom-United States (ANZUKUS) alliance was also established as well [6]. ATO, CENTO and ANZUKUS then merged with NATO to form the World Defense Treaty Organization (WDTO), and served as the main bulwark against Communism around the world. It combined the buildup of conventional and nuclear weapons to deter any Soviet military action.

    As a response to the the formation of NATO, CENTO and SEATO, the Socialist Warsaw Pact was created in 1956. It included the Soviet Union, Finland, Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Mongolia, and North China. While the Warsaw Pact saw a full-fledge alliance among Socialist nations, leaders in the Soviet Union knew that their pact was fully outnumbered by NATO and SEATO (later ATO) forces in the West and East; however, calls for massive military spending were shot down by the moderate Bukharin-Tomsky-Rykov triumvirate, knowing it would drain resources from the Soviet consumer economy. To make sure they can still defend themselves against the West and still have a growing economy, they focused on increasing the stockpile of nuclear weapons while reducing the size of the Soviet conventional military and turning it into a still-sizeable professional armed force, its former soldiers reeducated and rehired in other jobs akin to the GI Bill in the United States. In the process, the Soviets were able to keep their military spending below 6% of their GDP and invest more resources in their non-military economy, all while deterring any Western military action. However, they still largely funded clandestine communist insurgencies across the globe in order to gain more allies for themselves [8].


    THE MARSHALL PLAN: A PATH TO ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR THE WEST

    ZpJATjgm.png

    The Marshall Plan gave much economic and military aid to Western-aligned nations in Europe and Asia.

    To counter the Soviets across the world, US President Harry Truman signed the Allied Recovery Program (ARP), now commonly known as the Marshall Plan, into law on June 4, 1945. It gave 70 billion dollars and more of economic and military aid to pro-Western countries which economies were devastated by the Second World War, provided that there be general agreements in diplomacy and national policy in the recipient states. Thus, it gave enough leeway to extend aid to allied states ranging from democratic nations such as the United Kingdom, France, Philippines and Japan to authoritarian ones such as Italy and China [9]. The United States also offered to extend aid to East Germany, Finland, Poland and Czechoslovakia, but the Soviets blocked it, and countered with their Prochnost (Strength) Recovery Plan in order to lift up the Soviet puppet states' economies from the devastation of the Second World War [10].

    The aid continued to flow well into the 1960s, and while most economists say that it only accelerated the general recovery of Western-aligned nations devastated by the Second World War, the structural changes it enacted in recipients’ economies had immense importance, as it forced the enactment of progressive social and economic reforms in them; however, each country’s political systems were allowed to be unchanged to prevent schisms in the Western Cold War bloc, hence the giving of economic and military aid to Benito Mussolini’s Italy and to Jiang Jieshi’s South China. The Marshall Plan also allowed recipient nations to end austerity measures and reduce political discontentment in the process, helping stabilize Western-aligned countries in the process. It also gave much funds for national defense for these countries [11].

    There were also talks about giving economic aid even to developing countries not affected by the Second World War, and the proposal became law in 1961, to help developing countries, especially in Africa and the Middle East, become developed after their independence [12].



    ------------------------------------------

    [1]. Far fewer than the 60 million IOTL. This is because there was no Operation Barbarossa/Soviet Front, and fewer European nations went to war ITTL. The title of the country most devastated by WWII goes to China ITTL, as half of WWII deaths come from them; the death toll is far lower than OTL's 20 million because the Communists had been defeated before 1937, that, along with Burma not falling to Japan and greater Chinese preparations, helps them win more victories and evacuate more Chinese citizens from the frontlines.

    [2]. Butterflies.

    [3]. Sucks Bukharin was IOTL dead long before the Yalta Conference. I couldn't get a better pic for this TL's conference; most had pics of Stalin, who was exiled ITTL because of Lenin's Testament in the mid-1920s.

    [4]. Will put more detail about these in a future East Asian update. But as for Japan and Syngman Rhee's rule in Korea, it's development is like IOTL, for now. And yeah, Korea is not divided ITTL. More on that later, as said.

    [5]. Since the European Theather did not extend into the Balkans and Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria, they are not under Communist rule. The Soviet presence in Poland and Czechoslovakia spooks them, so they join NATO.

    [6]. Will put more detail about these in a future Southeast Asian update. The developments here will be far different than IOTL without the fall of China to communism. A factor contributing to SEATO thriving ITTL is because it's structure more like NATO, which is more capable at responding at attacks against a member state ("an attack on one is an attack on all members, a more split-decision and centralized chain of command, etc.)

    [7]. In a future East Asian update.

    [8]. To be fair, even though ITTL's Warsaw Pact has fewer nations, it does have MUCH more people in it, since there was no Holodomor, no Stalinist military purges in 1937-1938, no Operation Barbarossa, and the fact that Manchuria in 1940 had a higher population than Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary combined. The Soviet economy is also far larger than IOTL because the economic growth ITTL was slower but steadier without Stalinist excesses, and because their economy was not devastated during ITTL's WWII, so again, the Soviets are, by and large, in a stronger position ITTL, even though they control less countries. And as said in the paragraph, the Bukharin-Rykov-Tomsky triumvirate is much more pragmatic and moderate than Stalin, so they can lead the Soviet Union to a better path. Note as well that the Soviet Union's entrepreneurial class has not been decimated like IOTL because Stalin does not rise to power, so they can help with the development of the Soviet Union after WWII.

    [9]. IOTL, while aid was given to Allied Asian countries as well, the bulk of the aid went to Europe. ITTL, with Manuel L. Quezon's lobbying and with South (Nationalist) China adamant for aid to counter the Soviets and the North Chinese, the USA also gives much aid to Asian countries, and even larger than what Europe receives because of Eastern Asia's sheer size. Also, the United Kingdom does not get much aid compared to other devastated Allied countries, as its economy does not get gravely affected by WWII; in fact, it grows during the time because the war economy kickstarts them again, and Lend-Lease really helps them as well.

    [10]. Like IOTL, only that the hardliner Molotov does not rise to position due to the Bukharin-Rykov-Tomsky triad being in power.

    [11]. This is a stark difference from OTL. With Truman's Democrats controlling all levers of government, they are able to push for more socially and economically progressive reforms, which is in line with the Democratic Party's policies, as Hubert Humphrey said in 1948 IOTL,

    We can’t use a double standard -- There’s no room for double standards in American politics -- for measuring our own and other people’s policies.

    This is also means that because the Democrats are in power and have done what they could to counteract Communism during the Berlin Blockade, and because the Korean War has been butterflied away, the Republicans can't do much to assail them for being "soft" on Communism, so this also means the US will be much more willing to tolerate Western-aligned left-wing governments rather than forming right-wing dictatorships anywhere across the globe.

    Also, the aid continues for much longer because there is no Korean War. IOTL, the advent of the Korean War made Republicans (who controlled Congress IOTL) wary of giving more aid due to cost concerns. I retconned this and it is reflected in the Export-Oriented Reform update here.

    [12]. Alternate decolonization development, esp. with Britain and France on much stronger footing, and since they will certainly want to aid the colonies and not create crapshows out of them. Note as well the isolationist leanings of the Republicans IOTL will not be in any position of power ITTL.
     
    Last edited:
    PART XXIX - THE EAST ASIANS’ ROAD TO PROSPEROUS INDEPENDENCE
  • CHAPTER IV - THE COLD WAR

    PART II - THE EAST ASIANS’ ROAD TO PROSPEROUS INDEPENDENCE



    Excerpt from

    The Oriental Miracle: East Asia After the Second World War
    By Heather Long

    After the Second World War, East and Southeast Asia was immensely devastated by the Second World War. Millions had been killed and much of their cities laid in ruins, and the future seemed bleak on many. However, in the years after, East and Southeast Asia rapidly recovered and became one of the wealthiest regions on Earth and became reliable economic and ATO/WDTO military allies of the West.


    G4PuLcVm.png

    Syngman Rhee's tenure, while seeing some gradual recovery from the Second World War,
    saw instability and rampant corruption took hold in Korea.

    In Korea, the Americans put Syngman Rhee in power from the beginning of the country’s independence in 1948. While the general economy of Korea grew during the 1950s and it joined ATO in 1961, rampant corruption and the resultant economic inefficiencies slowed down growth and increased discontentment against the government; thus, by 1960, amid student protests and demonstrations, President Rhee resigned and an interim government took power. However, another period of instability ensued, and Army General Park Chung-Hee overthrew it with a coup on May 16, 1961. Park implemented robust economic growth policies that were popular with the populace, but calls for democracy and massive protests from mid-1962 to 1963 forced Park to conduct elections by November 3, 1964, especially for the reason to give legitimacy to the Park government. Democratic Party National Assembly Senator Yun Bo-seon, a noted pro-democracy and progressive fighter, ran against him for that election. Park Chung-hee and his allies were not worried about the elections and expected to win. However, Election Day would dispel all those assumptions.

    5QFEbiX.png

    The Korean political world and most especially Yun himself were shocked by the results and three further recounts that he had won the Presidential election, Korea choosing to reject strongman politics and accept a pro-democracy figure as their leader by just 216,150 votes [1]; the mainly urban and more liberal Seoul-Incheon and Pyongyang areas, along with other central Korean provinces, turned out for Yun, while the more rural southern and northern tips (due to anticommunist conservative rhetoric in North China-USSR border provinces) of the country voted for Park. Many expected Park to the reject the results, but the American government vowed to retract aid if such power grab occurred. Thus, Park subsequently conceded accepted the results. Yun’s Democratic Party also won the majority of downballot elections and controlled the National Assembly, achieving full control of local and national politics in the near future. To defuse tensions with the military, he appointed Park to the Ministry of Defense and other pro-Park figures in some government positions but ensuring that progressives controlled the majority of cabinet positions.

    With avid American support, he was able to implement democratic and progressive civil rights and economic reforms in legislation and passed constitutional amendments enshrining such protections. He also accepted the good segments of the military government’s economic and social policy. Yun implemented the first Five Year Plan, ushering in the transformation of South Korea to a Philippine-like export economy and utilizing the trade revenue modernizing the impoverished nation. He also enacted massive military spending to placate the military and counter the North Chinese and the Soviets, whom they have borders with. Thus, the Korean economy entered what is now called “The Miracle on the Han River”, with Yun’s robust economic initiatives would turn Korea’s into a social democratic powerhouse of East Asia [2].

    EuTbQl1.png

    The Liberal Democratic Party dominated Japanese politics for the entire Cold War era.

    Meanwhile, matters were quieter in Japan, where the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) became the dominant party for much of the duration of the Cold War. The LDP, under American demands, enacted progressive socioeconomic reforms and rejected a pacifist proposal to the Japanese constitution banning non-defensive warfare, and Japan also joined the Asian Treaty Organization (ATO) soon afterward to counteract the Soviets to the north. Afterward, the Japanese economic miracle occurred, turning the devastated former Axis country into one of Asia’s economic powerhouses, pumping out high-quality exports year after year [3].

    hb6lyR1m.png

    Khorloogiin Choibalsan followed the moderate socialist policies enacted in the Soviet Union.

    Meanwhile, in Mongolia which did not see any combat in the Second World War, Khorloogiin Choibalsan mainly followed the Soviet Bukharin-Rykov-Tomsky triumvirate in implemented moderate socialist reforms in the country, deemphasizing a large conventional military and focusing on a relatively small but professional conventional military and the placement of Soviet nuclear missiles in the country to invest more resources into science and technology and the consumer economy. It also made freedom of religion commonplace in the country to prevent any religious uprisings in the country, as had been implemented in the Soviet Union [4]. The country then joined the Warsaw Pact in 1956.

    pKe1i7Dm.png

    Generalissimo Jiang Jieshi led the South China's post-WWII economic boom.

    South China, out of all East Asian countries, was the most devastated and initially struggled to grow in the late 1940s because of rampant corruption and the existence of many warlords in the country. Its most industrialized lands in Manchuria all went to China due to the 1947 Beijing Agreement, which divided North and South China along the border at Hebei [5] Province and cutting through a small part of Inner Mongolia, leaving the more impoverished areas of China to the South. Thus, in 1949, Jiang Jieshi held bogus elections aimed at entrenching his power and overthrowing all warlords in the country, which succeeded; he consolidated his power over the entire political apparatus of the country to implement more reforms aimed at raising the country’s economy, and, in the process, raising his popularity [6].

    Helping matters was the Marshall Plan. The Plan gave South China 30 billion of US dollars in aid and low-interest loans and more from 1949. They also received 15 billion US dollars of military equipment and thousands of military advisors to train the country’s armed forces, and China also joined ATO in 1961. About four million volunteer soldiers were also inducted into the all-professional Chinese Armed Forces, much of them deployed to South China’s border with North China, Mongolia, and their direct border with the Soviet Union [7].

    To put the aid to good use, Jiang Jieshi created the Ministry of Economic Planning and the Bureau of Strategic Industries that resorted under it, which used the majority of the funds for economic development. This economic planning body focused on a domestic-oriented economic growth model aimed at attracting foreign investments and improving the country’s businesses. The mining, steel, electricity, oil, and arms industries were largely nationalized and received heavy investments, and the agricultural sector saw a major land reform giving land to many peasants and which gave them ample agricultural equipment and education, thus creating a new middle class that would then invest their money into other industries. Mining deposits were fully exploited as long as environmental regulations are followed. South China’s Two Five-Year Plans for the 1950s saw massive growth in the country’s heavy industry and resulted in growth rates of up to 15% during this time. Infrastructure was also given much priority, and the country implemented high-speed rail by 1960. Afterward, the Five-Year Plans of the 1960s focused on implementing reforms aimed at rapidly expanding the country’s light/consumer industry and services, and implementing business policies that heavily attracted foreign investment by that time, resulting to another batch of high growth rates of up to 15% during this era.

    7lnhiQmm.png

    Nanjing Road in Shanghai, China in 1970, where many booming businesses located along it as China's economy boomed.

    Of much importance was the progressive socioeconomic reforms Jiang Jieshi enacted as a requirement to receive Marshall Plan aid. A progressive tax rate was introduced, environmental regulations, strong labor protections and living wages for all workers. Universal kinder-to-college education, housing, a jobs guarantee and health care were also enacted, and massive infrastructure spending were enacted, which enabled South China’s economic gains to extend even to low-income people. Nuclear and hydroelectric power became dominant in the country, slowing the rise in greenhouse gas emissions in the country and which gave the country long-lasting energy security. Public transport was given higher priority over cars, with all cities in the country having subways and bus rapid transit (BRT) systems by the end of the 1960s. Starting as a backwater economy in the 1940s, China was now one of the world’s most promising emerging economies, and there was no way to go but up in terms of economic growth and social mobility in the country [8].

    HfXwk3bm.png
    Ce6AcVDm.png

    Hong Kong (left) and Macau (right) grew into Asian Tigers as well, although wealth inequality was rampant.

    Hong Kong and Macau, on the other hand, pursued more laissez-faire export-oriented economic policies, which, while ensuring rapid growth and development for the port cities into Asian tigers, induced high economic inequality and an underground crime scene. All these regressive economic policies were rectified after they joined China by the 1990s after the British and Portuguese chose to hand over the two cities to China in 1997 and 1999, respectively [9].

    jZp6bwb.png

    Deng Xiaoping, Liu Shaoqi, and Zhou Enlai also enacted moderate socialist reforms in North China.

    Meanwhile, in North China, the Chinese Communist Party under General Secretary Liu Shaoqi, Prime Minister Deng Xiaoping, and President Zhou Enlai implemented moderate socialist reforms modeled under the Soviet Union’s tutelage. Most of the economy was largely nationalized but farmers were largely allowed to sell grain at their own prices. Services were put under government control and the country received aid from the Soviet Union to rebuild the nation after the Second World War. While growth was not as large as South China’s, the economy of North China still grew by around seven to eight percent from 1949, and like the rest of the Warsaw Pact, which it joined in 1956, it deemphasized a large conventional army and favored the placement of nuclear missiles and the creation of a relatively small but professional armed forces to invest more resources into the consumer economy [10].

    iiMZYImm.png

    The North China-South China border in Inner Mongolia

    Deng, Liu and Zhou also fostered the creation of the North-South Fortified Border Wall and the North China-Korea Border wall from 1950 to 1953. It was the most heavily-guarded border in the world along with the Inner German and Berlin Wall borders in Europe. These stemmed the brain drain that had occurred after the People's Republic of China had been established in Manchuria, and enabled them to use what was left of their intellectual class for their economic policies [11].

    By the 1960s, all of East Asia strongly recovered from the Second World War and became economic powerhouses and would play a massive role in the world economy for decades to come.


    ------------------------------------------

    [1]. I flipped the results from OTL South Korea, which saw Park winning and then IOTL South Korean democracy went downhill from there.

    [2]. This also dispels the notion that countries can only become developed if there is a strongman in power, esp. in ATL Korea. And most of all, in ATL's Philippines' economic model, which Yun basically copied.

    [3]. Japan is mostly like OTL, but without Article 9, the ATL development mentioned in the previous update.

    [4]. Since Stalin was not in power ITTL, Choibalsan would not pursue Stalinist policies in Mongolia when he took power.

    [5]. At least Beijing's not under communist control ITTL.

    [6]. I saw this POD in a Nationalist China thread I searched, so I thought I should put it here.

    [7]. Okay, I retconned the amount of the entire Marshall Plan; it's now at 70 billion dollars total, 30 billion going to South China ITTL.

    [8]. The implementation of social democratic market-oriented reforms greatly helps China and starts its economic boom +20 years earlier than IOTL :)

    [9]. Largely like OTL.

    [10]. As said in this update, much of the Chinese Communist Party leadership died during the Long March. This is the POD that ensures Nationalist control over much of China's territory post-WWII. Only the younger moderates, Deng, Liu and Zhou, remain here, as Mao Zedong dies during the time.

    [11]. I've yet to detail into the "moderate socialist" Soviet economic policy here; that's reserved for a future Soviet Union update.
     
    Last edited:
    PART XXX - STORIES FROM BOTH SIDES OF THE IRON CURTAIN
  • CHAPTER IV - THE COLD WAR
    PART III - STORIES FROM BOTH SIDES OF THE IRON CURTAIN

    A New World Order
    By Jaime Jenkins

    Europe was devastated and divided along the Iron Curtain after World War II, yet soon afterward, both West and East rose to be formidable powers in their own right.

    THE UNITED KINGDOM OF ROSES - LABOUR'S POST-WAR RISE

    hs8TCqom.png

    Labor Prime Minister Clement Atlee ruled Britain for much of its early post-war years primarily on promises of domestic reform.

    After five years of war in Europe, the British people wanted a change in politics. While Conservative Prime Minister Winston Churchill was popular with the people, that popularity waned somewhat with economic troubles stemming from high national debt and inflation due to the war, and the Conservative Party itself was not popular due to the appeasement policy towards Nazi Germany in the 1930s.

    Meanwhile, the Labour Party under Clement Atlee formulated a national program, titled, "A Nation of Roses", which guaranteed universal healthcare, universal public education, expanded welfare programs, enhanced voting rights, much more bargaining power, and more. Labour argued that to prevent Britain from sliding back into a recession, huge government spending must be guaranteed, and that since the war was over, Britain can now focus on its internal affairs and on primarily helping the needy in Britain. To sweeten the deal, Atlee promised that he will form close relations with Western allies such as France and the United States, accepting much aid from the latter via the Marshall Plan.

    In the end, Labour's messaging was successful, and in the 1945 general election, they won 432 seats, far more than the 321 needed, a two-thirds supermajority.

    Afterward, Labour was able to push through with its plans under Prime Minister Clement Atlee. The National Health Service (NHS), Britain's universal healthcare program, was established in 1946, and public college became free by 1950; all private schools will be banned from charging tuition and instead will receive government funding. Welfare programs were expanded, and voting became mandatory for any person, male or female, at the age of 21 (later lower to 18 in 1965 and 16 in 1989). Civil rights for any person regardless of race, sex, nationality, and religion were enacted. Military spending was lowered to below World War II levels but kept high (above 2% of GDP to comply with NATO requirements) due to the brewing Cold War.

    Most of all, the top marginal personal and corporate tax rate was maintained at 100% as it was during the war, and loopholes and tax havens banned, the top inheritance tax at 82%, and the top wealth tax at 35%. In turn, Social Security was ensured, negative taxes for lower-income people and micro, small, and medium businesses were made, and universal basic income (with work requirements with exceptions) fixed to the national individual poverty level was made. Wages were also tied to the cost of living in each business' constituency.

    Labor rights were expanded, with all public and private employees having the right to unionize and form deals with employers, and the post-war era saw the national union membership rate rise to 65% by 1975. Nuclear energy became the main source of energy of Britain by the 1950s, and the environment was giving much funding. High-speed rail akin to Japan's Bullet Trains came into service by 1957. Criminal justice, which entailed less forceful policing and drug decriminalizaton, were enacted in 1960.

    Meanwhile, Britain's standing in the world did not wane much. While it was no longer a superpower by the 1960s, it was able to handle decolonization better than expected. After Israel annexed the Sinai, West Bank, and Gaza in 1968, Britain prevented a coup against King Farouk of Egypt from happening, and successfully guided it to independence. It was also able to prevent apartheid in South Africa and prevent Northern Africa , the Indian Ocean islands, and Southern Africa from falling into communism. It was also able to foster developed countries in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and ensure peaceful transition of power in India, Burma, and Pakistan [1], and the British Commonwealth was soon formed. Britain also procured nuclear weapons. It was also able to counteract deindustrialization by encouraging foreign and domestic investments in advanced technologies, infrastructure, space, and research and development.

    With the success Britain had after the war, Labour was awarded election wins in 1950, 1955, 1960, and 1965. During those times as well, the "right" faction of Labour, i.e. social conservatives on issues of abortion and sexuality, slowly took over in a socially conservative Britain. By 1960, Labour had been taken over by social conservatives in the form of Jim Callaghan [2], and with much of the Conservative Party's help, formed a two-thirds supermajority that opposed socially liberal reforms in such areas.


    By 1960, Britain's had fully recovered and have far surpassed its wartime era in development.


    BLOODY VICTORY: POST-WAR FRANCE

    vOEbt5Cm.png

    France was one of the most damaged countries during the Second World War.

    Meanwhile, to the South, France was in a worse position than Britain. While it had miraculously won the war against Nazi Germany at the Ardennes, its northern lands, were much of its industry were located before the war, was devastated, and while Paris itself was spared much of the destruction, the economy still shrunk even with American support.

    MijIirOm.png

    The 1945 French general election, wherein French women had their first opportunity to vote.

    By this time, the conservatives that had ruled France for much of the 1930s were ousted in favor of a 60% supermajority coalition of social democrats, socialists, and communists, which modeled their economic agenda on those of British Labour in the post-war years, their policy of appeasement during the 1930s and the immediate post-war slump crashing conservative numbers across the country, especially in the devastated northern part of France. There was also the scare that communists would take over France, but those fears were unfounded as the social democrats under allied with the conservative minority to ally with the West.

    Cbdosqem.png

    Most French colonies became independent from the 1950s and 1960s and fell into chaos; however, France tried to make sure the transitions were peaceful.

    It took six years for France to reach prewar levels of economic development, and it also had trouble managing its colonies. Indochina became independent in the 1950s and broke up into three countries, at least allied with France and the World Treaty Organization (WTO): Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. By 1963, Algeria became independent, although with trouble brewing to its south in the Sahel, Algeria became firmly allied with the West and WTO. French Congo fell to communism, and Syria became allied with the Warsaw Pact due to Hafez Al-Assad's takoever in 1965.

    However, France was at least able to be firmly have a developed economy status by the 1960s, was able to pay down its debt, and while it had no chance to be a superpower, it still had considerable soft power as a permanent member of the United Nations. The Benelux countries, Portugal, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Austria, Switzerland, Ireland (but with more focus on financial services), and Scandinavia, also followed the French model of an economy dependent on domestic consumption but with open trade with other countries, leading to a balanced trade situation and low government and corporate debt-to-GDP ratios. Social conservatism also took hold in the country as conservatives still had control over the nation's laws regarding abortion and sexuality.

    G7iHe4Hm.png

    France was instrumental in postwar attempts in bringing Europe together and avoiding another war.

    France was also instrumental in bringing together Europe via the European Economic Community (EEC), a free-trade program enacted by European countries, as it was deemed necessary to make all European economies intertwined to prevent a costly war from happening again. Eventually, the EEC became the European Union (EU) by the early 1980s, and even before the EU, the European WTO was able to build a unified European Army by 1991.

    THE SUCCESS OF FASCISM IN ITALY AND SPAIN

    19l6cxam.png

    Both Spain's Franco (left) and Italy's Mussolini (right) promoted the fascist, authoritarian welfare system of politics.

    Meanwhile, Europe had some authoritarian and fascist monarchies still standing: Italy and Spain. Italy was part of the Allies during the Second World War, and helped France and Britain force a stalemate against the Nazi war machine until such time the Americans and Soviets came, defeating the Nazi threat once and for all. Spain was neutral, reeling from the Spanish Civil War. After the war, both nations, having similar ideologies, forged a "special relationship" akin to that between the United States and the United Kingdom; both had been the first ones to connect their nations with relaxed immigration quotas and free trade deals.

    Italy and Spain followed the Benito Mussolini playbook of rapid economic development via world trade whilst combining it with political repression and a social welfare state to maintain their power. Some nations followed their lead, such as Jiang Jieshi in China and the Estado Novo regime in Portugal. Both economies also followed the trend of decolonization in Africa, and relinquished their colonies by the 1960s as they became white elephants for them, although only Ethiopia was the only one of the Italian and Spanish colonies to never saw civil strife as other African nations fell to political chaos. The two countries then became democracies in the 1980s, with the deaths of Spain's Francisco Franco in 1980 and Benito Mussolini in 1984.

    STRONGER THAN EVER: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER WORLD WAR II

    pbakOQIm.png

    Soviet and Nazi soldiers meet up and celebrate as Poland is divided, October 6, 1939

    Perhaps the country other than the United States that benefited the most from World War II was the Soviet Union. Future unearthing of records would reveal that Hitler wanted to invade the Soviet Union had he defeated France and took over Europe, and while the Soviet Bukharin-Rykov-Tomsky troika had fully prepared for the war armed with intelligence reports from Germany, the Soviets dodged a bullet as France and Britain successfully repelled Germany in June 1940 and forced a stalemate similar to the trench warfare of World War I.

    XGR8iqLm.png

    Soviets enter the ruined city of Warsaw, July 4, 1944

    Afterward, the Soviet Union waited until the Germans were sufficiently weakened when they decided to invade Germany from the East in 1944. Implementing the "deep battle" tactics developed by Marshall Mikhail Tukachevsky, the Soviets took Poland, Czechoslovakia, and East Germany in quick fashion, and with lessons learned, successfully crushed Finland brought it to the Soviet sphere. The Soviets also developed a large navy since they did not have any major enemies, having five destroyers and two carriers by the war's end.

    YauuKr1.png

    Post-War Europe's geopolitical divisions

    With the Soviet Union successfully having growth rates of above 5% due to Bukharin's "New Economic Policy" (NEP) of allowing small-time enterprise to sell their goods to the state, and by the mid-1940s, steady economic growth meant that the Soviet Union was at the height of its economic power at the time, had slowly developed the technologies for their armies to defeat Germany from the East, and need not take industry away from their puppet states to develop the Soviet economy. After winning in Europe, the Soviets then turned on invading Manchuria, South Sakhalin, and the Kuril Islands, and succeeded in doing so. The Americans occupied Korea and Japan before they can do so.
    By 1945, the Soviet empire expanded, and by 1949, the Warsaw Pact was born, with the Soviet Union, Poland, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Finland, Mongolia, and North China being part of the military alliance. The Soviets were also granted a permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council, a way for the Soviets to have world influence, and a way for the West to include the Soviets in the UN and denounce its actions in the General Assembly (proportional by population size), if they could not attack it in the Security Council (one vote per country).

    xgNPDyum.png


    ULC1cdem.png

    The post-war reformist troika after 1960: Alexei Kosygin (right of image), Nikita Khrushchev, and Nikolai Podgorny.

    By the 1960, the NEP was showing its cracks, and further reforms had to be done to maintain the Soviet economy's growth as Bukharin, Tomsky, and Rykov retired in favor of General Secretary Nikita Khrushchev, Prime Minister Alexei Kosygin, and Supreme Soviet President Nikolai Podgorny. The Communist Party agreed to allow competition between state-owned enterprises, would focus on nuclear and clean energies, maintaining the, and the embark on a massive computerization program to make central planning much easier. They also agreed to increase agricultural production via the Virgin Lands Campaign by introducing crop rotation with ample funding in the Central Asian Republics of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan, and succeeded in doing so, increasing agricultural production five-fold and making the Soviet Union a net exporter. Free trade was also enacted among the COMECON nations. All these ensured that the Eastern economies grew at rates higher than 3% and turned them into developed countries.

    98aka2Em.png

    St. Petersburg in 2016. It is now the largest city in the Soviet Union, 15% of the country's population, because the government first implemented market reforms in the city.

    Eventually, by the end of the 1970s, the Eastern Bloc introduced "special economic zones" and allowed large private enterprise to flourish in cities such as Leningrad, Minsk, Kiev, Volgograd, Vladivostok, Alma-Ata, Taskhent, Chișinău, and Tallinn. By the 1990s, the Eastern Bloc no longer had pure command economies; rather, they have social market economies akin to the Scandinavian ones, as the SEZs' functions were extended to all Soviet cities. The Soviet government still have state-owned enterprises to guarantee basic services such as water, public works, food, fuel, and others [3].

    DENAZIFIED: WEST AND EAST GERMANY'S DIFFERENT PATHS TO THE FUTURE

    31ebW77m.png

    The Berlin Wall was the foremost sign of Germany's Cold War-era division.

    After World War II, the Nazis were destroyed and Germany was divided into East and West. Berlin was also divided, and the Inner German Border and Berlin Wall cordoned off the two Germanies until the end of the Cold War.
    In West Germany, Bonn became the country's capital with Berlin divided. The Nazis were banned, and far-right politics were discredited. As a result, the Social Democratic Party took over in the aftermath of the war, having moderated on social issues (with more Christians joining the party) and shaking off its non-religious roots. Its leader became Kurt Schumacher, who proved to be popular with the West Germans and ensured the SDP victory in the 1949 West German federal elections [4].

    lt9fptKm.png

    Kurt Schumacher was the face of Germany's postwar rise.

    Under Schumacher, the Miracle on the Rhine started: West Germany became Europe's most developed country in 40 years' time as low inflation and rapid growth above 3% ensued. The social market economy was introduced, leading to a generous welfare state at the same time that German companies expanded throughout the state. To build upon sound economic growth and to protect Europe from communists to the East, the West agreed to have West Germany build a large army with no limits, provided that the United States, United Kingdom, France, and Italy to station troops in the country to avoid the rise of neo-Nazis and extremist groups. Thus, the SDP became Germany's natural governing party after World War II [4].

    mIrhdIwm.png

    East Berlin in 2001

    Meanwhile, in the East, Germany initially followed the NEP and imposed a command economy, but eventually followed Soviet economic liberalization. While the economic progress was slower, the East German economy was able to constantly have healthy growth rates and be one of the Eastern Bloc's leaders in terms of economic development. On economic issues, the Socialist Unity Party of East Germany became popular and public discontent about political repression was silenced for a while.

    HFJVLWSm.png

    West German Chancellor Willy Brandt and East German Premier Willi Stoph on Ostpolitik talks in Geneva, Switzerland.

    Eventually, the two countries engaged in Ostpolitik talks in the late 1970s, successfully building sound geopolitical and economic relations and eventually both joined the UN in 1991.

    Poland, Czechslovakia, Finland, Mongolia, North China, and other Soviet client states followed the East German and Soviet examples, and by the turn of the new millennium, the Eastern Bloc had fully caught up with the West in terms of economic and social development.


    ------------------------------------

    [1]. More on these in later updates.

    [2]. Jim Callaghan's premiership takes off after winning the 1960 Labour leadership election. The Jenkins reforms get nipped in the bud.

    [3]. Inspirations for the ideas come from Hrvatskiwi's Stars and Sickles (SAS) and Onkel Willie's Year of the Three Secretaries TLs (YOTTS). The competition for SOEs and SEZs are from YOTTS and Kosygin's OTL and OTL Deng Xiaoping reforms, while computerization came from SAS. The idea of crop rotation for the Virgin Lands campaign came from this thread.

    [4]. I shifted the electoral results here a bit. I had the mainstream conservatives lose more seats than IOTL with Allied help... and the SDP is experiencing the same social conservative turn like Britain's Labour under Jim Callaghan as the failure of the CDU/CSU to gain power makes more Christian democrats flee for the SDP and change it from within.
     
    PART XXXI - POST-WAR AFRICA
  • Excerpt from

    A New World Order
    By Jaime Jenkins

    Africa was spared the chaos that gripped Europe during World War II, but since most of its countries were under colonial rule, the countries were not able to take off economically during the colonial era. It all changed after Africa became independent.

    HANGING BY A THREAD: THE EGYPTIAN MONARCHY

    BFnXEf9.png

    The 1948 Arab-Israeli War, or the Israeli War of Independence, resulted in major territorial gains for Israel and nearly caused a coup to succeed against King Farouk of Egypt.

    In 1948, Israel resoundingly won over the Arab nations after a Palestinian assassin nearly killed pro-Israel US President Harry Truman [1], resulting in Truman intervening and allowing Israel to take the entire West Bank, Gaza, and Sinai went to Israel, successfully taking that area east of the Nile from Egypt and making Israel a regional power in the Middle East.

    HZzudYKm.png

    After the failed coup against him, King Farouk of Egypt led over numerous social and economic reforms to allow it to become a developed country.

    Israel's victory meant that the Egyptian monarchy's power under King Farouk of the House Muhammad Ali was severely weakened, as the Egyptians thought he was a weak leader against Israel, resulting in a coup attempt by Gamel Abdel Nasser in 1952, which failed with British and French help. This was not enough, however, to prevent Sudanese independence, which happened in 1956.

    To stabilize the situation, France and Britain, with their positions still strong after World War II [2], while Egypt did gain independence as the country was getting unmanageable, they did give economic and military help to King Farouk's government, enabling him to rule over a time of double-digit economic growth until his death in 1999, when the Egyptian Revolution finally resulted in a constitutional monarchy for Egypt.

    The success of the Egyptian model was eventually adopted by African monarchies such as Burundi, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Tunisia, Lesotho, Swaziland, Morocco and Libya [3].

    A DIFFERENT MODEL: THE KENYAN EXPERIENCE

    Win5ZErm.png

    President Barack Obama, Sr. was the main face of Kenya's postwar prosperity.

    Meanwhile, as the African monarchies prevailed, Kenya provided an alternative. In 1964, it became a republic under President Jomo Kenyatta. However, Kenyatta was abjectly corrupt, using the Presidency to enlarge his family business, all the while his country descended into economic ruin. As such, a discontented and unemployed man gunned him down on June 9, 1967 [4]. In the ensuing chaos, the relatively progressive-leaning Barack Obama, Sr. took power and would rule the country for fifteen years until 1982, when he then stepped down. Under President Obama's term, Kenya was able to foster a developed economy that focused more on domestic consumption and open trade rather than focusing on exports, just like the post-war United States [5].

    Barack Obama, Sr. also fathered Barack Obama, Jr., who eventually rose in America's business world and politics, even as his father ruled Kenya. Obama, Jr. was eventually able to establish a tech company and a law firm that was eventually integrated into Liberty Transnational by 2008, with him in charge of governing it outside of elected office. Obama, Jr. was eventually able to enter the US Senate in 2004 from Illinois as a Democrat [6]. Then-Senator Obama became a fierce advocated for warm US-Africa relations...

    Many other countries in Africa followed the Kenyan model as well, as much of them did not have monarchs like in Ethiopia, Swaziland, and Lesotho. Madagascar and other Indian Ocean islands followed this model.

    DISASTER AVERTED: THE RISE OF A MULTIRACIAL SOUTH AFRICA


    mm8mLg6m.png

    Prime Minister Jan Smuts of South Africa faced the battle of preventing rampant segregation from becoming law in the country.

    In 1948, South Africa was at a crossroads. In that year's elections, the National Party (NP) was in favored of mandated racial segregation in the country, and the United Party (UP) was in favor of racial diversity and equality. Whoever won the election would determine South Africa's path on race issues.

    However, the economy was still reeling from a stagnation that happened ever since the Second World War ended and South African factories were no longer needed for war production. People were getting tired of UP rule, and many wanted a change in leadership. However, the UP stressed that it is the party of progress and equality, and lambasted the NP for promoting bigotry and racism in South Africa, and Prime Minister Jan Smuts vowed to "fight against hateful interests".

    guAVGHt.png

    The National Party was expected to win until such time in 1948 that expanded voting rights and made voting mandatory (with guarantees of American, British and French help to the liberals on race issues), allowing many Black and Asian people to vote in the elections, resulting in a win for the UP, enough for constitutional amendments to be made; had only Whites been mostly able to vote, the NP would have won. Also, the economy began to experience a growth rate of 7% in 1948 as part of the US Marshall Plan, raising the UP's numbers.

    Afterward, UP Prime Minister Jan Smuts enacted progressive civil rights and economic programs akin to American programs, and fostered a developed country as the UP governed for much of the postwar era as the NP got discredited in the eyes of minorities (thus ensuring them voting as single blocs in favor of the UP), guaranteeing South African prosperity for years to come.

    RED TIDE: THE RISE OF COMMUNISM IN AFRICA

    Communists in Africa tried to prove an alternative to capitalism in Africa, and in some countries, they did gain power, with the help of the Soviet Union, which had a strong economy and had much money to provide to communist regimes abroad.

    KDb1hQc.png

    Patrice Lumumba became Congo's face of independence.

    In the Congo, Congolese took to the streets again as the economy collapsed due to lower worldwide copper prices, in which raw exports if it the economy depended upon, and most of all, due to the lack of political and economic representation. Amidst the chaos came, a certain Patrice Lumumba was able to witness the political change happening in the country and decided to participate in it, forming his Mouvement National Congolais party to defend native Congolese interests and advocate for Congolese independence, and even unification with the French Congo to form one, united republican Congo. Eventually, Lumumba, popular with the Congolese, made public calls for independence.

    VcgYxsim.png

    Congolese independence on June 30, 1960.

    Eventually, by 1960, Congo became independent, and while the country faced the Congo Crisis in 1961, with the help of UN Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld [7] [8], the United States, Europe, and the Warsaw Pact recognizing Lumumba as the rightful leader of the Congo (Kinshasa).

    YFTpjkTm.png

    The flag of a united, communist congo, finalized in 1969.

    However, along the process of change in the Belgian Congo, Lumumba had also made contact with some local communists and was eventually converted into a communist himself sometime around 1958, but decided to heed his allies' advice to hide his beliefs until such time that Soviet aid can already come to the country. He thus decided that he was only going to be publicly progressive and pro-independence only in public, and communist in secret [9].

    In 1963, the two Congos, Congo-Kinshasa and Congo-Brazzaville, united. With Congo-Brazzaville being almost completely control by Marxist-Leninists by 1964, their numbers, along with Kinshasan communists, proved to be too great for any anti-communist progressive to wrestle back control, and by 1965, President Lumumba came out as a communist as Soviet equipment and missiles hastily arrived at Congo City (Brazzaville and Kinshasa united as one city). With that, the Warsaw Pact had one more ally in Africa. They may have a dearth of allies in Europe and Asia, but they were certainly gaining in other parts of the world.

    8RT7Kz5m.png

    The Nigerian Civil War resulted in communism rising in the country.

    Concurrent to the events in Congo, civil war was ravaging Nigeria as Biafra tried to become independent of Nigeria. Ethnic tensions between the Igbos of the East and Southeast and the Hausas of the West and North flared as the country went into financial ruin and famine after becoming independent in 1960.
    Biafra was supported by the Western nations, and the Nigerian Federal Government gained the support of the Warsaw Pact, as the Soviets hated secessionist movements. The viability of Nigeria hung on the balance during the war, as Biafra had large oil reserves and Northern Nigeria was mostly made up of desert. Eventually, Nigeria won and Biafra rejoined Nigeria by 1969 [10].

    Owing huge amount of debt to Soviet lenders and having Soviet advisors and equipment in the Nigerian military, and with communists already successfully infiltrating the ruling Nigerian government, Nigeria eventually swore fealty to the Soviet Union and effectively joined the Warsaw Pact and COMECON by 1971.

    The fall of the Congo and Nigeria to communism was a game-changer in favor of the communist world. With strong and proper platforms to spread communism in Africa, the seeds were sown for a successful takeover of communism in numerous countries. The entire Sahel and Western Africa fell to communism by 1973 after inept leaders caused financial ruin in the African countries located there. In Central Africa, the communist world spread to Angola, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi, and Mozambique. All joined the Warsaw Pact and COMECON by 1975.

    MSl4Qn2l.png

    Africa's geopolitican divisions by 1980. Blue is part of the WTO/Western Bloc, and Red is part of the Warsaw Pact/Eastern Bloc.

    The only countries in Africa left that were non-communist were Algeria, Morocco (with Western Sahara firmly under its control), the monarchies of Swaziland, Lesotho, Tunisia, Egypt, Ethiopi, Somalia, and the republics of Sudan, Djibouti, Madagsacar, Kenya, Liberia, Namibia, Botswana, South Africa, and the Indian Ocean countries. Due to Red Scare happening after the fall of much of Africa to communism, the non-communist countries in Africa joined the World Treaty Organization (WTO) and received Marshall Plan aid, all becoming developed countries in the end even as their economic growths started after Asia and Europe.

    Many migrants and refugees eventually escaped Africa to lead new lives in many countries, most especially the United States. Although such Africans had anti-communist tendencies due to their experience, they tend to support the more progressive Democrats with the failure of the Republican US government to extract some African refugees out of Lagos in 1971 and Zimbabwe, resulting in all of their deaths.



    ---------------------

    [1]. One change I invented. The Israelis have a better post-WWII landscape with greater Western aid.

    [2]. Since France doesn't fall to Nazi Germany, both the UK and France are in better positions without the US totally saving their asses after getting ruined by France's fall.

    [3]. Gaddafi's coup fails. The rest have failed uprisings against their monarchies as well.

    [4]. IOTL, his Economics Minister was the one who was gunned down.

    [5]. Without Obama, Sr. getting blacklisted by Kenyatta after #4 not happening ITTL, he is in a far stronger position. He also isn't a dick to his family, so there is no falling out with Obama, Jr. From this thread comes the idea: https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/ahc-president-barack-obama-senior.311988/

    [6]. Some things just don't change.

    [7]. My inspiration is Onkel Willie's TL here, only until Congo becomes independent. As for Congo being united and under socialist rule, it's based on Hrvatskiwi's Stars and Sickles, its link in the last update.

    [8]. The Secretary-General lives ITTL, so Congo has a less rocky road to independence.

    [9]. Going the Fidel Castro route.

    [10]. Earlier victory for Nigeria with Soviet support. This idea is totally mine, as Nigeria had Soviet support. With the Soviets infiltrating Nigerian government and economic circles, they successfully suppress any anti-communist sentiment in the Nigerian Federal Government.
     
    Top