Very impressive Greater support for colonialism and settlers through movie. Is there a less racist version of GWTW, setvin libya maybe?
GWTw? What’s that?Very impressive Greater support for colonialism and settlers through movie. Is there a less racist version of GWTW, setvin libya maybe?
gone with the wind, and a slipped hand.GWTw? What’s that?
Given that ATL Mussolini was somewhat less scummy than OTL, in keeping Nazi Germany at arms length pre-war before then fighting alongside the Allies, is it the case that Fermi stayed in Italy and that he is responsible for Fascist Italy becoming a nuclear power? While I don't know how much true conviction Fermi used to have towards Fascism, is it supposed that he turned more firmly ideologically dedicated? If so, then does that make him a controversial figure within Nuclear Physics in nations like the USA?Fermi married Laura Capon, a science student at the university, on 19 July 1928.[36] They had two children: Nella, born in January 1931, and Giulio, born in February 1936.[37] On 18 March 1929, Fermi was appointed a member of the Royal Academy of Italy by Mussolini, and on 27 April he joined the Fascist Party. He later opposed Fascism when the 1938 racial laws were promulgated by Mussolini in order to bring Italian Fascism ideologically closer to German National Socialism. These laws threatened Laura, who was Jewish, and put many of Fermi's research assistants out of work.
Some questions I have regarding Enrico Fermi, one of the principal scientists behind the Manhattan Project. So this is something I found shocking. Apparently he had been a member of the Fascist party.
Given that ATL Mussolini was somewhat less scummy than OTL, in keeping Nazi Germany at arms length pre-war before then fighting alongside the Allies, is it the case that Fermi stayed in Italy and that he is responsible for Fascist Italy becoming a nuclear power? While I don't know how much true conviction Fermi used to have towards Fascism, is it supposed that he turned more firmly ideologically dedicated? If so, then does that make him a controversial figure within Nuclear Physics in nations like the USA?
It was from Fermi's Wikipedia entry.I would advise you add source when you quote another site so you don't get problems.
I'm surprised the British didn't do everything they can to get sea access for Lesotho or a land strip to Lusitiania. The country probably has the most developed airline industry in the world.
There is the option of using the 'search - this thread' function of this forum.Some questions I have regarding Enrico Fermi...
Most historians believe that the transfer of American nuclear knowledge to the Soviet Union started at the infamous meeting Wallace had with Gorsky, though the rest is somewhat fuzzy. Gorksy (in what could only be described as darkly humorous when one has the full details of the case) tried to convince Wallace that Secretary of State Hiss could be relied upon to do the job. Hiss feigned reluctance when approached but was inwardly stunned nonetheless. It was the greatest possible outcome for the Soviets – Hiss reportedly mused if he would get an Order of Lenin for the accomplishment. From there, Hiss contacted his controllers and coordinated a plan to extract the mechanisms for nuclear weaponry in full. From that, Operation Lighthouse was born. Every Soviet spy in Moscow’s books in the American atomic program was given a specific assignment. With the White House itself giving out passes to the assailants like candy, it was no problem. While the chain had many links, it culminated primarily in a series of spies who existed right at the heart of the Manhattan Project. Heading the ground operation were the couple of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who enlisted Klaus Fuchs and Morris Cohen among others to gather the materials required. Given security passes straight from the top, the assignment proved to be, in the words of Cohen, ‘boring and easy’. By the middle of 1947 (precise dates are hard to quantify given the intensity with which the Soviets approached the secrecy of the operation), it was estimated by one historian that ‘more than 90% of the Manhattan Project’s notes could be recreated in Moscow’. MI6 had reported to Whitehall that there were serious movements in the Soviet atomic program, but they were dismissed given reports of how primitive their systems initially were. Indeed, the European powers (especially Britain and Italy) continued to pursue separate programs. As the head of the Italian Nuclear program (Enrico Fermi) would later recall ‘we worked lazily without knowing we had gun barrels pressed to our temples’.
Terra afroaustralis incognitaI like to think that most of the World think that SA doesn't exist and cuts them off from any world map.
We don't exactly do that to North Korea, so there's that.I like to think that most of the World think that SA doesn't exist and cuts them off from any world map.
There's a reason why when people think of Korea, South Korea would be the one to pop up.We don't exactly do that to North Korea, so there's that.
Better to link to the Completed TL thread. Easier to just use Ctrl+F, too.There is the option of using the 'search - this thread' function of this forum.
I remembered vaguely Fermi being one of the leaders of Italy's nuclear program in this timeline. I remembered correctly - a search led me for example to this chapter about the soviets getting pretty much the entirely of the Manhattan project handed to them on a silver platter.
I like to think that most of the World think that SA doesn't exist and cuts them off from any world map.
But the cost which led to said outcome makes it a scenario which isn't better (or worse) than OTL, just different.Anyway, I have bit thought this world and comparing to OTL I would say that FoM is better than OTL. USA and Canada are pretty same as OTL altough USA mgiht not be politically as polarised as in OTL. Latin America is mostly better. Cuba is democratic nation, Central America hasn't suffered from disastrous civil wars and Brazil and CHile have avoided brutal military dictatorship and South America is economically more proseprous than OTL. Africa is generally more stable and prosperous altough SA is really shithole and Ethiopia is just different but not much better or worse than OTL. Middle East is more stable and peaceful. Rest of Asia is much better than OTL if you are not Muslim in India nor Ainu in Japan. India is more prosperous and due lack of Pakistan there is not endless fear on nculear war. Indochina has escaped communism and terrible wars. China might be bit authotarian but far from totalitarism of PRC. Kore is unite and there is not North Korea. Russia is pretty much pacifist nation which decreases tensions in Eastern Europe. Belarus is democratic nation, there is not tensions in Caucasus, at least not as serious as in OTL. Eastern Europe is more liberal and prosperous. Balkans too is economically bit better.
But the cost which led to said outcome makes it a scenario which isn't better (or worse) than OTL, just different.