I personally like kings lists-they help me to think about how these different rulers would react to the larger historical events and it helps to flesh out details to the polity.
Well you could make it so they are seen as just a different "tribe" of humanity since they are so similar and can obviously procreate with humanity. There would be some genetic differences of course, but not anything too wild. If you wanted to go into a more lore aspect, Neanderthals could be recognized as different and oppressed in certain places (not because they are seen as genetically different obviously but rather the view that they are a different "tribe") and other places seen as sort of special. (think of the notion of royal families and that sort of bloodline) You would also have to geographically separate them from regular homo sapiens in some way to prevent the intermixing that would just create, not Neanderthals' on a large scale. This would occur anyways but if you wanted to keep actual Neanderthals alive than this separation would probably have to occur.Honestly? just eyeballing it and drawing inspiration from real-life paleogeography. Also GProjector.
Yeah but im still not sure how to incorporate them yet.
Quick question for everyone, would you rather I list every ruler of the major nations in the timeline or just the ones that are important? I'll eventually post king lists too if people are interested.
Coming eventually...View attachment 566254
Looks nice!Wow, this is probably the best geofic I've seen in a while! Here, I tweaked the colors of the planet and put it through Map to Globe. Looks pretty good!
https://www.maptoglobe.com/SJdef3mR3
View attachment 854190
Fucking awesome. I'm gonna make it my profile pic.Wow, this is probably the best geofic I've seen in a while! Here, I tweaked the colors of the planet and put it through Map to Globe. Looks pretty good!
https://www.maptoglobe.com/SJdef3mR3
View attachment 854190
I'm glad you like it!Fucking awesome. I'm gonna make it my profile pic.
Unfortunately not.Yes.
As such, having a 3:4 resonance makes sense.
Is there a way for one of the moons to be Luna-sized/ the right distance for total solar eclipses?Unfortunately not.
At least, according to Universe Sandbox over a time period of only 300 years, which was how long it was stable before Eos (yes, the smaller one) kicked Ersa out of the system and into an orbit around Lurus. The last resonance option of 1:2, though, is indeed "stable" over the 3000 years i tried for. Emphasis on those quotations, though. The moons don't follow a track, and they constantly jostle one another back and forth, albeit rhythmically. Eos always has an elliptical orbit, while Ersa fluctuates between further and closer (more circular) orbits. This is assuming Ersa orbits at lunar distance (on average), and Eos take half the time Ersa does to orbit Tellurus once (aka ~ 237,500 km, with a notable fluctuation). These two moons, ESPECIALLY Eos given its size and Io-like predicament with the other moon, will be seismically active. I don't know exactly how seismically active, but it wouldn't be unrealistic to say there are a few volcanoes on the bugger.
Also, apparent sizes from the surface of Tellurus. Pretty much the same size, and much smaller than the moon. I got these sizes from the sizes of the moons comparison chart. Don't mind the textures for the moons, I edited preexisting saturnian moons. Oh, and you also won't ever get a total solar eclipse.
View attachment 855733
(Edited; I confused mass for radius last time. Fixed it. Note that Eos is about the same size as Ceres, but a bit denser)
Changing the size is the easy solution, but changing distance makes for an even more alien world. Plus, since the moons are lighter than ours, tidal forces won't have pushed them as far as OTL. (This technically means that Tellurus can easily have days shorter than 24 hours, up to maybe 16, but there are so many variables considering the extra moon that this is effectively optional.)Is there a way for one of the moons to be Luna-sized/ the right distance for total solar eclipses?
Interesting. Thanks for figuring this kind of stuff out I would have been so lost trying to do it myself. I think I'll go with only Ersa being able to do total eclipses.Changing the size is the easy solution, but changing distance makes for an even more alien world. Plus, since the moons are lighter than ours, tidal forces won't have pushed them as far as OTL. (This technically means that Tellurus can easily have days shorter than 24 hours, up to maybe 16, but there are so many variables considering the extra moon that this is effectively optional.)
Below is what the simulation says for a total eclipse. For Eos, the distance is 105,000km or less, and with Ersa it's 200,500km or less. Note that the image below is only of each moon's total eclipse distance, and they are not shown in a 2:1 resonance (or any resonance for that matter, the ratio is gibberish).
View attachment 855999
So, you have two options, if we keep the 2:1 orbital resonance:
1. Only Ersa gives totals
-Eos at 126.5kkm, Ersa at 200.5kkm
2. Both give totals
-Eos at 105kkm, Ersa at 166.5kkm
Note that both are far more stable than when the moons were further, since they're much closer to Tellurus and thus moving faster. Ersa always holds a circular orbit but fluctuates slightly while Eos always takes a more elliptical orbit, with an eccentricity of approximately 0.1 (it fluxuates, but that might be a consequence of Universe Sandbox running on newtonian physics and not general relativity). Both work well, I recommend either. Of course, this means that whichever you choose, you'll have at least one moon the same apparent size as Luna.
No worries, I enjoy this. If you're going for only Ersa eclipsing Lurus, there are a few things to set in stone.Interesting. Thanks for figuring this kind of stuff out I would have been so lost trying to do it myself. I think I'll go with only Ersa being able to do total eclipses.