While it may seam to make sense for the British to construct a large tank production facility. Much as the Soviets and Americans did during WWII. Unlike the Soviets who were forced by the Germans invasion to move the majority of their industrial production East, and thus it made sense to them to establish mega factories on virgin lands. This was very much in accordance with Soviet thinking and policy from pre war, hence Tankograd, which massively expanded an existing large caterpillar tractor factory. While in America, which up until the war had only small and disconnected tank production facilities. It was far simpler given that their large automotive production facilities were switching to various wheeled military requirements, and their tradition of large integrated facilities. Too, given the availability of land, labour, resources and money, to build new armoured vehicle production/assembly facilities, rather than trying to adapt existing facilities. Britain is in a very different position, it doesn’t have the tradition of building large integrated factories, other than a few American companies that established such, to be able to get around the Imperial Preference regulations. The British government prior to WWII, looked around for ways to rearm, while trying not to derail the British economy which was steadily improving after the financial crash of 1929. The government chose to use facilities that were being underused, as this both allowed the government to increase production of armaments, while increasing employment in depressed areas. Britain was ‘lucky’ in that thanks to its previous industrial dominance and subsequent decline, it had a large number of underused heavy industrial facilities. Especially in railway locomotive production, which had both large buildings, machine shops and heavy cranes. With a reserve of experienced staff, that can be retained from building locomotives to tanks, of which the majority being older, will not be subjected to conscription.
There is also the fact that, Britain is not producing just one type of armoured vehicle, it is producing an increasing variety of armoured vehicles, both tracked and wheeled. From the ubiquitous Bren Gun Carrier, various armoured cars, SPG’s, the beginning of the numerous ‘funnies,’ and more than one type of MBT, though they are not at present called that. While both the Soviets and Americans were fantastic at producing thousands of essentially one type of tank, they various T34’s or M4 Shermans. They were not so good at producing some of the more specialist armoured equipment, such as AEV, bridge layers, and amphibious tanks. Remember the Sherman DD, was essentially an American tank that the British adapted, and supplied back to the Americans. It makes total sense for the British to concentrate on what they are good at, and leave the Americans to get on with what they are good at. While the Soviets might prefer the latest British tanks as lend lease to American tanks, unless the British have a surplus of tanks to their requirements. Once the Americans get their production up to speed, the British will insist that they don’t have any tanks to spare, so it’s going to have to be American tanks Uncle Joe. In the same way, once this Time Lines equivalent of the M4 Sherman is available, the British will be more than happy to accept it, especially for service in the Far East theatre. ITTL Britain is in a much better position in regards to tanks, than it was IOTL. It might be in a position that it can supply all of its tank requirements in the European theatre from its own production. Only requiring American half tracks as infantry carriers, and utility vehicles, for its armoured and mechanised devisions. While in the Far East other than specialist armoured equipment, American tanks will be more than sufficient against the inferior Japanese tanks.
RR.