Map Thread XXI

Status
Not open for further replies.
j84gxrwjtt791.png

The Bubonic Death - Spread and mortality

Bubonic Death​

or the Second Plague Pandemic

The Bubonic Death (also known as the Genoan Plague, the Mongol Plague, the Second Plague Pandemic or the Persian Plague) was a series of major outbreaks of the bubonic plague across the Afro-Eurasian continent between 1345 and 1354. It was the most fatal pandemic in recorded human history, causing the death of 100-350 million people. Likely originating from the area between the Tian Shan mountains and the Tarim Basin, the plague quickly spread via the silk road to Crimea and from there to the rest of the Middle East, Europe, Africa and Asia.

Spread​

The first likely mention of what would eventually evolve into becoming the Bubonic Death comes from Issyk-Kul, where Nestorian graves, dating from 1338-1339, describe plague-like symptoms. From there the plague was likely carried west via the vast trans-continental silk road, to cities in Central Asia and further into Crimea; towards Europe and across the Caucasus; towards the Levant. Another major vector of transmission was in the form of Central Asian mercenaries travelling towards India to serve in the retinue of the Delhi Sultan, leading to outbreaks in northern India as early as 1344.

The plague reached Crimea in 1345, via Italian merchants, it spread from there to Constantinople and onwards to Italy, Egypt, Al-Andalus and North Africa. Further yet into Syria and Mecca through the Hajj caravans and into Sudan, Yemen, Abyssinia Iraq, Oman, Persia, Zangistan and the Deccan through trade routes. By 1352 the spread of the plague stretched from Mali to Majapahit and from Kilwa to Kazan. The outbreak reached full circle when, in 1354, a strain of the plague, likely originating from Malacca, ravaged eastern China.

Outbreaks in Europe across the Alps, southern France and the Balkans are scarce and far between. A minor outbreak in Lubeck was recorded in June 1350 and another in Erfurt in September the same year, though mortality rates remain relatively low across all of these cases.


Consequences​

The total estimated death toll of the Bubonic Death lies between 100 and 350 million people.
Estimates for the death tolls vary significantly across geographical regions. Rural areas such as those in Central Asia and steppe regions were relatively lightly hit compared to large urban centres such as those in the Levant and the Ganges delta. These aforementioned regions lost approximately two-thirds of their population, all cities were reduced in size and some were even abandoned entirely. Ibn Battuta, the Moorish traveller and merchant, describes travelling through abandoned towns and cities throughout al-Andalusia and Sudan.


Socioeconomic effects​

The swift population decline brought on by the plague led to sweeping changes socioeconomic changes throughout Europe, Asia and Africa. After the plague swept through the levant the survivors found themselves returning to vacant fields, homes and estates. Along the Nile, labour-saving innovations in agriculture were developed and the conditions and wages of the remaining farmers increased across the board.

Though the urban populations throughout the affected areas wouldn’t recover in size until the 15th or 17th century, in some cases, the Bubonic Death would usher in the Second Islamic Golden Age. With Baghdad still reeling from the Mongol invasion a couple of years earlier coupled with the plague, Cairo and Isfahan became the new centres of the Islamic world.

Along the Zangistani coast, the Muslim power base in the urban centres of Kilwa and Zanzibar declined and raids from the interior became more and more frequent and effective. Abandonment of the East African trade ports led to a decline in trade around these parts of the Indian ocean throughout the late middle ages. The Omani and Persian reconquests of Zangistan in 1533, spurred by a bullion famine, were launched to rekindle the Zangistani gold trade.


Persecutions​

Jews and particularly Christians were taken as scapegoats and faced a new wave of persecution throughout the Muslim world during and immediately after the outbreaks. In Baghdad, it is said that after the plague had passed, the surviving Christians were driven to the river Tigris. In Cairo, it is said that Jews were thrown from tall towers and buildings, and in al-Andalus, a Rabbi muses the three fates for an Iberian Jew “the plague, the Moorish blade or France”.

Meanwhile, the Sultanate of Delhi, due to increased persecution and taxing towards the Dhimmi, faced several Hindu peasant revolts. These revolts culminated in the Princes’ and Peasants’ revolt in 1374, which toppled the Tughlaq dynasty of sultans.

A interesting aspect of this is that the global cooling which followed the Black Death would result in surplus population in Northern and Central Europe moving East and South.
 
Very interesting! Can we expect maps from Last and First Men or Star Maker? I know in some cases that would involve other planets, but I'm just excited to learn that you're also apparently a fan of Stapledon @B_Munro! His influence on sci-fi is truly unprecedented outside the likes of Verne and Wells.
 
The Bubonic Death - Spread and mortality
The Plague is underused as a realistic (read: not-Years-of-Rice-and-Salt) POD, this is a really well made map. I'm not sure what the long term social implications will be, since the population density issues in the MENA weren't the same as those in France from what I understand,
The Eurasian movement comes to power in the remnants.
Right after losing control of Europe.
"East is West"
The map is well-made enough that I won't grumble too much about being, I believe the expression is, ninja'd. Did Japan drift into socialism democratically or arrive revolutionarily?
 
Cool map and scenario. The color switch ups feel weirdly unsettling to me, although I suppose it accentuates the "east is west, west is east" vibe you're going for here. That the broad outlines of history the same, with Europe and East Asia reversing their positions, but even with specific nations filling in for specific nations. Still, something feels fundamentally unnerving about a pink Japan and a yellow Britain, say...

Some questions, if such could be asked:

1. Are there any geopolitical set-ups/alignments/etc between the various countries? The map doesn't explicitly say about any alliances between the major countries beyond their vassals/client states/minor allies, but seeing that it's essentially at a just-before-WW2 level of technological advancement (or so I gathered from reading the story, what with Britain-as-Japan analogue set to "liberate" Europe, which gathering from that must mean the story was probably written around WW2 or just before or after it) I'd assume the nations of the world would be primed to rumble for one last time before nukes are invented.

(Then again, apparently the story says the Chinese nations have thrown away their age-old enmities. If that is the case and you haven't retconned it, probably no war in east Asia, then. My guess here is that the principal conflict here will be between the UK and a coalition of east Asian nations, given it's fervent ambitions in expelling all Asians. As OTL, sufficient determination and ideology probably won't make up for overwhelming industrial and numerical superiority: the UK will lose handily, although with actual resources on the home islands, they might put up a better fight than the OTL Japanese. Frankly, though, both seem sufficiently unsavoury enough options that there doesn't seem to be a "good" side here.)

2. Say, for example, are the Japanese and the Councilliar Union by any chance allied or aligned in their goal of - presumably - world proletarian liberation? (or do their respective ideologies and goals differ enough to render mutual entente a non-feasibility?). On that note, what exactly are their goals, anyway? (The Japanese seem to be against colonialism at least in principle according to both the map and history, but then it's not like OTL Reds haven't had their own share of hypocrisies, and it's a "Japanese People's Empire" to boot! Socialized collective imperialism, where the income and wealth gathered from plundering people abroad is fairly shared and distributed among local Japanese? :p)

3. I'm curious about the Federation of New Nippon or Japanese USA here. They seem to be a imperialist to an even greater degree than the OTL one, outright controlling large swathes of land in Europe and elsewhere. How are relations with the home islands - are close cultural ties perhaps strong enough to bridge what are fundamental differences in ideology - or say, the other East Asian nations which still practice colonialism, which might be a better fit? Being colonized west-to-east instead of east-to-west, and with no easy early access to the Atlantic, did it ever have a history of slavery like the OTL USA? (Of course, it could be that instead of Africans, southeast Asians are the target :()


4. Where exactly are the fringes of the "Eastern" world/civilization delineated? I'm curious because, according to the story, this alt-Mongol/Turkish-dominated-Soviet Union is still seen (or was) as half-European (perhaps not entirely unlike OTL Russia being sometimes seen as half-Asian). I'm also curious about say, the Maoris, which while distinctly probably not east Asian seem to be developed enough to be a diplomatically equal, long-standing ally of Japan (and presumably given from the contact, a loy of Japanese cultural influence), which might blur the distinction a great deal, or say, what about the surviving indigenous nations in (mostly) South America (which also have received a great deal of Chinese influence, it seems). That and there's the "almost-east-Asian" Malay Union.





The map is well-made enough that I won't grumble too much about being, I believe the expression is, ninja'd. Did Japan drift into socialism democratically or arrive revolutionarily?
My (personal) guess is that a political break strong enough to cast off a capitalist and colonialist system the most extensive and of foremost importance in the world (Japan here and it's settler colonies is number one, after all, like the OTL Brits) would probably have to be decisive and radical enough to require a revolution.

(On the other hand, I'm skeptical myself as to the likelihood of a revolution leading to a socialist democracy whose "social conditions are the envy of the globe - we don't many good OTL examples as to that, after all. Not that I think it's impossible... but it's never been proved, no?)
 
Last edited:

Calculon

Banned
What's the best way to make maps? It seems to me the most aesthetically pleasing ones here are impossible to make with Paint.
 
1656369658888.png


1790: The New Hampshire Legislature ratifies the Federalist Constitution on February 28th, after months of intensive negotiations, horse trading, and concessions to the anti federalists. With its nine state threshold of ratification having finally been met, the Constitution enters into force within the ratifying states. The first United States Congress convenes on March 3, 1790, passing twelve articles of amendment to the Constitution and sending them to the states for ratification; ten of which are eventually ratified and become known as the Bill of Rights. John Adams – an American statesman, attorney, diplomat, writer, and prominent leader of the revolution – becomes the first President of the United States under the new Constitution.

On April 16th, the North Carolina Legislature votes overwhelmingly to secede from the United States, publishing a Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of North Carolina from these United States in explanation and support of its decision. The document cites “The tyrannical and illegitimate nature of the Hamiltonian Constitution” claiming the document tramples over the rights of individual states, is hostile to the property rights of slave holders, and that the extensive powers it grants to the presidency set the stage for American monarchy.

North Carolina’s move to secede is soon followed by South Carolina, whose Legislature passes an ordinance of secession on May 6th. Virginia Politicians, slightly more divided on the issue, leave the matter of succession up to the people of Virginia, with 51.5% of Virginians voting ‘Yes’ in a referendum on June 19th. Even miniscule Rhode Island briefly declares its separation from the union, however, food and supply shortages soon become crippling within just a few months, and a desperate Providence finally agrees to the ratification of the constitution by the end of the year on December 5th.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 754076

1790: The New Hampshire Legislature ratifies the Federalist Constitution on February 29th, after months of intensive negotiations, horse trading, and concessions to the anti federalists. With its nine state threshold of ratification having finally been met, the Constitution enters into force within the ratifying states. The first United States Congress convenes on March 3, 1790, passing twelve articles of amendment to the Constitution and sending them to the states for ratification; ten of which are eventually ratified and become known as the Bill of Rights. John Adams – an American statesman, attorney, diplomat, writer, and prominent leader of the revolution – becomes the first President of the United States under the new Constitution.

On April 16th, the North Carolina Legislature votes overwhelmingly to secede from the United States, publishing a Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of North Carolina from these United States in explanation and support of its decision. The document cites “The tyrannical and illegitimate nature of the Hamiltonian Constitution” claiming the document tramples over the rights of individual states, is hostile to the property rights of slave holders, and that the extensive powers it grants to the presidency set the stage for American monarchy.

North Carolina’s move to secede is soon followed by South Carolina, whose Legislature passes an ordinance of secession on May 6th. Virginia Politicians, slightly more divided on the issue, leave the matter of succession up to the people of Virginia, with 51.5% of Virginians voting ‘Yes’ in a referendum on June 19th. Even miniscule Rhode Island briefly declares its separation from the union, however, food and supply shortages soon become crippling within just a few months, and a desperate Providence finally agrees to the ratification of the constitution by the end of the year on December 5th.
Hmm, I wonder how that US will hold together. Especially as Georgia is cut off from the rest of the Union by the Carolinas and Virginia.
 
Hmm, I wonder how that US will hold together. Especially as Georgia is cut off from the rest of the Union by the Carolinas and Virginia.
Georgia almost certainly leaves the Union and joins up with the rest of the south in some way or form,
considering that in 1790 the state controlled a comically small amount of territory:
1656375812933.png
 
thegallantsouthland52.png

Here's a map from a world where, for some bizarre reason, Alabama stays in the Union during the US Civil War (and Kentucky ends up with the Confederacy). Afterwards Lincoln, Johnson, Grant, and Seward all die in a much bigger assassination plot, and Lafayette Foster and the Republican congress are PISSED at the south.

Hilarity ensues.
 
View attachment 754076

1790: The New Hampshire Legislature ratifies the Federalist Constitution on February 29th, after months of intensive negotiations, horse trading, and concessions to the anti federalists. With its nine state threshold of ratification having finally been met, the Constitution enters into force within the ratifying states. The first United States Congress convenes on March 3, 1790, passing twelve articles of amendment to the Constitution and sending them to the states for ratification; ten of which are eventually ratified and become known as the Bill of Rights. John Adams – an American statesman, attorney, diplomat, writer, and prominent leader of the revolution – becomes the first President of the United States under the new Constitution.

On April 16th, the North Carolina Legislature votes overwhelmingly to secede from the United States, publishing a Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of North Carolina from these United States in explanation and support of its decision. The document cites “The tyrannical and illegitimate nature of the Hamiltonian Constitution” claiming the document tramples over the rights of individual states, is hostile to the property rights of slave holders, and that the extensive powers it grants to the presidency set the stage for American monarchy.

North Carolina’s move to secede is soon followed by South Carolina, whose Legislature passes an ordinance of secession on May 6th. Virginia Politicians, slightly more divided on the issue, leave the matter of succession up to the people of Virginia, with 51.5% of Virginians voting ‘Yes’ in a referendum on June 19th. Even miniscule Rhode Island briefly declares its separation from the union, however, food and supply shortages soon become crippling within just a few months, and a desperate Providence finally agrees to the ratification of the constitution by the end of the year on December 5th.
Why do South Carolina and Vermont secede? They supported the Federalists; I find it more likely in states like New York, New Hampshire, or Massachusetts where the votes for ratification were far more close.
 
For those kingdoms which Mars gives to others, let Venus give to thee. (Or the only way to get the Franco-Swedish-Ottoman-Russo-Mughal-Thai alliance)

8Nw9U1H.jpg
 
Last edited:

Calculon

Banned
For those kingdoms which Mars gives to others, let Venus give to thee. (Or the only way to get the Franco-Swedish-Ottoman-Russo-Mughal-Thai alliance)

8Nw9U1H.jpg
You'd think they'd've known baja is part of the mainland by now, and with New Holland a colony Australia would've been circumnavigated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top