All Battleships ...... Snip....
Very informative post, thank you for sharing
All Battleships ...... Snip....
There's relevant data in here regarding something early on in the story:From Navweaps:
British 14"/45
From late 1942 to early 1943, "K" shell was introduced which contained dyes for coloring shell splashes. These shells also had a small fuze and burster to disperse the dye. I do not have the weight of these projectiles, but I would estimate that they would have added about 5 - 6 lbs. (2.3 - 2.7 kg) to the APC weight listed above unless there was a corresponding weight reduction in some other area. The following colors are listed in a 20 June 1946 Fleet Order:
King George V: Yellow
Duke of York: Green
Anson: White (this almost certainly means "no dye")
Howe: Red
Which is exactly the issues POW had
Hygura was by herself
Which ship is this? Is it a different transliteration of Hyūga?
All Battleships had reliability issues - the problem with the KGVs 14" rifles was not so much the Quad turrets but that 3 of them were involved in 3 intensive Surface actions which have subjected to a great deal of scrutiny that other actions have not been subjected too.
1. POW vs Bismarck - well she should still have been working up and not even handed over to the Navy - but needs of the service and all that and managed to fire
2. KGV vs Bismarck - fired 30 salvos (as many as 300 rounds but probably less as this included salvos where the rear turret might no have been in arc?) before starting to experience issues
3. DOY vs Scharnhorst - fired 52 broadsides (which could be upto 520 rounds if full salvos!) and then more later in the battle with only one major failure when a shell dropped of the cradle into the ammo hoist. Well if you will have a fight in a force 10 gale!
By comparison far less was recorded or investigated (certainly seems to be less available if it is!?) at the other surface actions of WW2 and the total number of Salvos is significantly less than in examples 2 and 3 above.
I mean how many complete salvos did the standards conduct at battle of the Surigao Straits?
Best I could find is:
Tennessee fired 69 14in shells during the battle, California fired 63 14in shells and West Virginia fired 93 16in shells. Of the less modernised ships the Maryland did best, firing 48 16in shells, taking her range from the West Virginia's fire. The Mississippi only fired a single salvo while the Pennsylvania was masked by the other American ships and didn't fire.
None of the examples I found gave data on any reduced salvos due to malfunctions
Washington vs Kirishima
She fired a total of 117 16-inch rounds (which is 13 or more salvos) in her mugging of the Japanese Battleship and I cannot find a example of more rounds fired by a US BB during a surface engagement but again have been unable to establish if she suffered any malfunctions or failures during the action
So with the exception of POW no other ships seemed to match the KGVs output in a single action but it would be interesting if anyone has any data on other battleship main gun reliability in action?
What about salvo firing for the old US Standards during shore bombardments?
I guess that in an NGS scenario keeping up as high an Accurate ROF is far less important than in a Dreadnought fight - so unless someone has a actual ships log or something we probably won't know
Eastern Makassar Strait 2227, January 2, 1943 to avoid secondary and unsympathetic explosions.
So a real life firefight with piss poor accuracy then?Remember that scene in the Clint Eastwood movie The Gauntlet where the police fire hundreds of shots at the bus carrying Clint Eastwood and Sondra Locke's characters?
I think we're about to see a real-life version of that in the Makassar Strait battle...