Through the nose is an old tradition at sea. One explanation was to make sure the man was, to quote the Munchkin coroner from the "Wizard of Oz", "really, most sincerely dead".
Mmm... As they say: Check and double check.
Through the nose is an old tradition at sea. One explanation was to make sure the man was, to quote the Munchkin coroner from the "Wizard of Oz", "really, most sincerely dead".
Two things:
1- what was IJN fire control like at this point IOTL? It can’t be better, and is probably worse, ITTL.
2- I need more popcorn....
Well, the Japanese will get their decisive battle. Just after the FAA and USN show how much the carrier has changed the game
AIUI, at the close ranges of a night action, nobody is really armoured against anyone else, assuming low inclinations. You could put an obsolete R-class 7k yards from Yamato and have them engage, in guns and armour terms, on surprisingly equal terms.
IJN
Optics superb.
Radar shit.
VS
RN
Optics good.
Radar superb.
&
USN
Optics good.
Radar okay.
One question I haven't seen raised: How well were all of these battleships armored against each other? Washington was only armored against 14" shells. South Dakota's were armored against 16". I believe that the KGVs were well armored also. How well are any of them going to stand up if they start getting hit by 18'' shells from the Yamato class?
For that matter how well are the Japanese BBs going to stand up to American 16" shells? btw, have the British got the bugs out of the quad 14" turrets yet in this TL? In otl when Duke of York went up against Scharnhorst in Dec 1942 the quad turrets still weren't as reliable as the twin turret. This would be a bad day to have guns jam.