People, there is any way to elect the Jacobins without crushing France in the process?
Purge Blum and Gamelin IIRC
People, there is any way to elect the Jacobins without crushing France in the process?
(by the way, there is any other party who follows what was communism OTl, AKA marxism Leninsm?)
Maybe half of Totalists in the mod are like that. The Soviets, Ukraine, Belorussia, Poland/Poland-Lithuania, Browder in USAS, Indochina, Argentina/Patagonia (not Fonte), Honduras/Centroamerica, most likely Spain after the rework. Probably some others I am missing or some I'm wrong about.
The American Vanguardists are definitely Marxist-Leninists (which is rather ironic when you think about it).I see Browder as the kaiserreich version of Stalin, while Foster is something close to Nikita kruschev, what do you think?
The American Vanguardists are definitely Marxist-Leninists (which is rather ironic when you think about it).
True I don't dispute that. It's amusing to me that the United States of all places is one of the last outposts of Marxist thought while even the Bolsheviks are mostly converted to Syndicalism.Why? As Far as I Know at the beginning all communist parties were under the soviet one, so if you was a american and declared yourself a communist you most likely would be a marxist-leninst.
True I don't dispute that. It's amusing to me that the United States of all places is one of the last outposts of Marxist thought while even the Bolsheviks are mostly converted to Syndicalism.
Yup. I've seen it. It's a good video. And you know what, if we're going to be commies then we might as well run the Revolution .By the way, I have shared this video here in the past and now you reminded me of it (since you are from kansas just like browder)
Basically, he had a more US centric vision of communism, something very interesting since he was not trying to take a foreign ideology and try to modify the national reality to implant it, but instead he wanted the USA to have it's own version of communism ( ofc with him as a crooked dictator in power ).
I see Browder as the kaiserreich version of Stalin, while Foster is something close to Nikita kruschev, what do you think?
Isn't Browder one of the "nice" Totalists though?
Foster also kidnaps children, enacts child labor on government farms and ranches, and legalizes suicide as a cover up for political assassinations. I'd say he's a lot worse than Browder in that regard.No, he's amoung the worse. All of them are pretty bad, but Browder does a lot of political purges, he even kills Francis Townsend (leader of the Share your wealth society, of Huey Long), something that Foster don't.
They're both trash. Simple as that.Foster also kidnaps children, enacts child labor on government farms and ranches, and legalizes suicide as a cover up for political assassinations. I'd say he's a lot worse than Browder in that regard.
Foster also kidnaps children, enacts child labor on government farms and ranches, and legalizes suicide as a cover up for political assassinations. I'd say he's a lot worse than Browder in that regard.
They're both trash. Simple as that.
They're both trash. Simple as that.
Hell. I prefer some natpops to those two.I may be a dirty syndie but I can't help but concur entirely. It's a little difficult (if not impossible) to redeem them and both mean that the Revolution has its heart pulled from its chest. They're no [insert non-Lusophone NatPops here], but that doesn't make them much better in my view.
Both are equally reprehensible to me.Both are trash, but one is more trashier than the other.