God is a Frenchman - a Timeline (Seven Yrs War POD)

1838 -- The First German Campaign (Part 2) The Battle of Leipzig
  • 1838: The War of French Succession -- The First German Campaign (Part 2) The Battle of Leipzig

    As the French move northwest from Erfurt cavalry scouting reports the clearing of towns with residents moving east towards Leipzig. Maupeou correctly interprets the local evacuations as a sign that he will be fighting a great battle at the largest Saxon city. Maximilian’s retreating army also heads for Leipzig, marching through the crossroads of Sangerhausen on 10 July. Roving French cavalry units encounter the Saxon rear and they skirmish at the limited Battle of Sangerhausen, but the main French force is still nearly 15 kilometers behind them and Maximilian’s army is able to rendezvous with the Coalition army at Leipzig on 13 July. Marshal Maupeou is less than a day behind the Saxon army and he halts his forward progress east of Schkeuditz north of the Elster River to give his men respite and send scouts around Leipzig to note the condition and location of the enemy.

    The Coalition sets up camp in the village at Gohlis just north of the city. Dobrovolsky set up his command in the city-owned Gohliser Schlösschen, a rococo-style manor with ample room for the Coalition’s general officers. After several hours of reviewing maps and strategies, the Russian commander insists on hosting a lavish meal for all the officers of brigade-commander rank and higher. While many of the generals favor such treatment, there is notable discomfort among their number. Schwarzenberg notably leaves the meal early as it drags into the evening, writing that he hopes “the amount of pure vodka imbibed at that table this night will clear any hidden uncertainties in the minds of these men. Foggy heads will surely ruin us against such a foe as Maupeou.”

    The French Marshal is also aware of the fight ahead of him. Maupeou has had little sleep when he rises on 14 July and upon seeing the vistas of rolling green dells blanketed in morning fog he remarks, “it is a tragedy of man to sully these lively fields with such bloody work.” The French commander has frequently waxed poetic about the greenery of Europe since his return from a four year stint commanding French forces in Algiers. Maupeou is anxious to begin the engagement, feeling the pressure to demonstrate French battlefield prowess after twenty-years of peace between the powers of Europe. He dispatches Lepic’s cavalry brigade to scout ahead with orders to engage any Coalition forces “if practicable” and call for reinforcements.

    Lepic’s chasseurs encounter a regiment of Austrian Hussars and give chase to Lindenthal, a village northwest of the city, where a pitched dismounted firefight ensues. By the afternoon both sides have called for infantry reinforcements, the first elements of which arrive in the 1400 hour. As the bulks of each army decamps by the evening a line takes shape from Leutzch in the west to Wiederitzch in the north. While little infantry fighting occurs the first day, with corps commanders testing each other’s strength, by nightfall it was clear that the Battle of Leipzig had begun in earnest.

    On the second day of fighting the two armies clash all along the Coalition’s defensive lines wrapping around Leipzig from west to north. The Coalition has the larger force but the French are more cohesive, being mostly from one organizational force. Schwarzenberg has ensured that the bulk of Austrian troops are held in reserve to plug anticipated gaps in Russian lines. The Russian corps are a combination of inexperienced recruits, conscripts and a number of units with experience in central Asia. While ferocious, this so-called Army of the Steppes is unaccustomed to large-scale field action.

    One Russian corps commander underestimates his opponent on the southern line and preemptively charges on the French, leading to the breaking of the line when the French corps facing them shatters them with infantry and artillery fire. The ill-advised charge leads to a French breakthrough at the Frankfurter Fields by Marshal Paul Frederic Duval’s corps, but the advance is halted by fresh Austrian troops under Ewald Paul von Hauser. Likewise, there is a breakthrough by Ludwig Adolf von Bar’s Deutsche Korps on the north end of the line with the Rhinelanders pushing Prussian troops back to Mockau that is ultimately blocked and swept back to the north by Coalition reinforcements. Bar is forced to fall back to avoid encirclement. At the conclusion of the second day, the Coalition’s center has held, while the Alliance left near Wiederitzch has wavered and the Coalition left is at serious risk of collapse having been pushed out of Leutzch.

    Overnight both sides reinforce the southern line and Dobrovolsky is certain that the position can be salvaged, discounting the Prussian Hacke’s argument to extend the line with reserves to preclude any flanking encirclement. Schwarzenberg personally is quite pleased with himself for his management of reinforcements and moves two divisions to reinforce the Coalition center between Wahren and Lindenthal. For the French, Maupeou plans a strong drive at the center to break through and cut the Coalition lines in half. He vetoes a plan by Marshal Duval to attempt to flank the Coalition to the South, owing to marshier ground and certain reinforcement.

    On Day 3 the French nearly break through at Lindenthal but face intense holding actions from Schwarzenberg’s well-positioned reserves. Meanwhile on the southern line Russian formations break interfering with the movements of the Saxon rear guard. Sensing an opportunity, the French corps under Marshal Duval breaks formation in the south to chase crumbling Russian left towards Connewitz. This move allows elements of the Saxon reserve corps under Albrecht von Gräfe to maneuver into position on the Frankfurter Fields and move towards Leutzch, cutting off Duval’s formations from the Alliance. Schwarzenberg directs Hauser’s battered but well-formed corps to move on Connewitz and destroy Duval’s now-isolated troops.

    To the north, a Prussian corps under Ernst Georg Kurtius savages Bar’s Deutsche Korps, collapsing their position when his artillery is successfully moved to a small hill to the northeast. This breakthrough proves to be decisive as the Prussians are able to curl back the French lines and create an unsustainable “kink” in the line that ruins its integrity by early-afternoon. As French reserves are rushed to the northern flank, Schwarzenberg is able to punch through the center, leading nearly all Alliance corps to fall back. Maupeou, fearing a rout, signals his corps commanders to disengage and withdraw and regroup at Halle. Two northern Alliance corps are detained by the Coalition encirclement, with only a few companies able to break free and rejoin the French columns. Duval’s corps, mostly unaware, is also left behind, dangerously isolated near Connewitz.

    Dobrovolsky is ecstatic at the French collapse and wants to move in pursuit for a knockout blow at Halle. Schwarzenberg protests, backed up by Hacke that the Coalition needs to take stock of their captives and deal with Duval’s forces before moving the army. The Russian is adamant and insists that the Russian units move on Maupeou while his Coalition partners consolidate their positions in Leipzig. “This is precisely the type of fight a Russian warrior lives for! I will not deprive him!” Dobrovolsky is reported to exclaim. His German counterparts cede to his wishes, with Prussian, Austrian, and Saxon forces remaining to clean up in Leipzig. The Rhinelanders and French in the north undertake an orderly surrender. Meanwhile, Duval and his corps hunker down in Connewitz and force the Coalition to siege the village. He doesn’t surrender until 18 July, two days after Maupeou’s retreat to Halle, and only then insists on being received by Schwartzburg personally. The three days at Leipzig cost over 24,000 casualties across both armies and nearly 30,000 Alliance men captured.

    Dobrovosky’s march to Halle proves to be an unproductive endeavor. While his pursuit does convince Maupeau to withdraw further, rather than regroup for a second attempt at Leipzig, French rear and cavalry units savage the Russian vanguard, already exhausted from days of fighting. The Battle of Halle successfully screens the French retreat from Leipzig, ensuring that their army will be able to rest and regroup. On 20 July Maupeou musters his army to march southwest from Halle to Weimar, which he finds more suitable ground for an active defense, abandoning the idea of capturing Leipzig in the current campaign. The Coalition dispatches Cossacks to harass the French on their way, prompting several grueling cavalry fights near Weißenfels and Droyßig, but the French successfully reach Weimar by 27 July, where they strategize a defense that will hopefully set up further offensives in the future.

    The Coalition finally moves on Weimar, reaching the French position on 4 August. Maupeou has two additional fresh corps from France at his disposal, while the Coalition also has reinforcements from Prussia. The Battle of Weimar lasts for a week, as Maupeou conducts an active defense shifting the French position at night and surprising the Coalition with new lines in the morning. Though exhausting for his soldiers, the tactic works at frustrating the coalition and bleeding their forces considerably until Dobrovolsky countenances ending the engagement. Dubbed “Maupeou’s Revenge” in the French papers, the “seven days at Weimar” severely reduce the Coalition’s capabilities to advance without significant reinforcements.

    News of the defeat at Leipzig is not welcome in France. Coupled with worsening news from the Italian front, the war is seeming to shape into an embarrassment for the ambitious Franco-Spanish King. While Weimar softens the blow, expectations had been high to capture Leipzig and hold it until an advance on Prussia could be mounted. Henri begins discussing higher mobilization with his cabinet–a levee en masse–to ensure that the French are prepared for battle on multiple fronts. Despite his disappointment with the 1838 campaign, Henri has faith in his ultimate victory. He starts to pressure the Rhineland to officially enter the war and contribute their armies to the effort. He also makes plans for a sweeping blockade of the Baltic and Adriatic to cut off the Coalition from maritime trade. Despite an early end to campaigning, both sides are bloodied. Tensions within Coalition command are heightened after the loss at Weimar, and both sides are eager to reinforce, reassess, and strategize for the next major thrust.
     
    Last edited:
    Map: Overview of Germany c. 1838
  • Map: Overview of Germany c. 1838

    GIAF Germany c. 1838.png
     
    Last edited:
    1838-1839 -- Punjab War
  • 1838-1839: The Punjab War

    Through the early-19th Century the Sikh Empire had become a powerful force in central Asia, controlling vast areas of the western Himalayas and the Punjab. Traditionally a rival of both the Persian Afghans to the west and the Mughals to the east, the Sikhs warily watched as French interests further embed themselves into the Indian subcontinent. In 1838, Nihal Singh became the Maharaja of the Sikhs. As heir he was a frequent advocate for confrontation with the “French puppets” in Delhi, particularly after the collapse of the Maratha confederacy left little organized resistance to French intervention in the region. These instincts were fostered by the Russian ambassador in Lahore, Boris Golitsyn. The Russian diplomat reinforced the negative impression of the French and had previously negotiated a wide-reaching trade deal that supplies extensive European arms to the Sikhs. Alexei Isleniev, a regimental commander in the Russian Imperial Army arrived in late-1837 to train the Sikhs, specifically the new British-made Durham Rifle, purchased en masse by the Russians in 1836. Golitsyn’s goal is to force the French to fight in India just when the Russian Coalition engages them in Europe.

    Tensions with the French escalate in June 1837 when the rakish adventurer and mercenary Captain Jean-Claude Abelard is arrested in Amritsar for a dalliance with one of the Maharaja’s sisters. Despite his reputation, Abelard has strong connections with French administrators in India, being a close friend of Louis Alexandre de Rouvroy, the Governor-General in Pondicherry. A delegation is dispatched to Lahore to officially protest but is denied an audience with Nihal Singh and Abelard is executed. The French delegation reports to Rouvroy’s attaché in Delhi, Henri Desbassayns, of the slight as well as the deliberate displays of Khalsa riflemen. Anticipating hostilities, the French dispatch an expeditionary force to Lakhnau joined by Bengali and Awadhi forces in October, 1837. Not wanting to provoke the Sikh however, Mughal Emperor Akbar Shah II declines to welcome the defensive army to Delhi, despite Desbassayns’ counsel to prepare for an attack.

    In the late-summer of 1838, after a soaking monsoon season, months of training, and continued encouragement from the Russians, the Sikh launch an attack towards Delhi. Vir Singh Nath, a Sikh general famed for his campaigns against Persian Afghanistan, thrusts into Mughal territory with a Khalsa army. At a village on the south bank of the Sutlej River, the Sikh smash a larger Mughal force at the Battle of Aliwal, utilizing their rifles with deadly effect, screening them with infantry, keeping the riflemen mobile with hit-and-fade tactics. The victory at Aliwal leads the Khalsa forces to swiftly move through Ludhiana and reach Kaithal by early-September. The French forces under Marshal Charles Camille Le Clerc de Fresne take time to travel from Lakhnau to Delhi, with muddy conditions hampering gun-carriages and cavalry. There are fears that the Sikh will sack the city before they arrive. One of Akbar Shah’s most reliable allies, Anand Rao Shinde of Gwalior, arrives at Delhi with a large army and moves to confront the Sikh, intercepting them in mid-September at Jind. The Khalsa are forced to retreat under heavy artillery fire at the Battle of Jind and Nath moves them north back to Kaithal.

    Fresne’s army arrives in Delhi the same week and organizes a push to break Nath’s Khalsas. The Sikh general controversially abandons his heavy artillery at Kaithal as the French approach, making for a more mobile army that retreats to the northwest towards Muktsar to meet reinforcements. Fresne joins with Shinde and they march towards Muktsar, fending off raids and harassment by Sikh cavalry. The allied army is forced to halt at Hisar due to a late bout of monsoon rain that causes flooding in Punjab. Frustrated, Fresne puts his army to work protecting Hisar from floodwaters that don’t recede until early-October. Upon consulting with his allies, he decides to barrack his army outside of Hisar for the winter, sending a substantial force to reinforce Delhi itself and resume campaigning in the spring.

    Throughout the winter both sides dispatch cavalry forces to raid across the region and Fresne receives the worrisome reports from the war-front in Europe. He resolves to quickly end this invasion and force the Sikh into a settlement. In April, 1839 his army musters from Hisar and makes for Muktsar. General Nath matches Fresne’s movements and the two armies meet on 4 May at the Battle of Doomwali near a small farming village. The French are impressed both by the Khalsa artillery and their sharpshooters, who specifically target French officers over their native allies. Despite initial disarray, the allies retake the initiative and ultimately punch through the Sikh lines with chasseurs, scattering the riflemen and opening up the field to allied forces. The Sikh retreat and soon accept an offer for a peace conference.

    At the Peace of Ludhiana, Henri Desbassayns represents both French and Mughal interests with a team of subordinates. He affirms pre-war borders and extracts tribute from the Sikh as recompense to both France and Delhi. The treaty also puts firm limits on Sikh internal artillery production as well as barring arms trade with Russia, making France Lahore’s only option for European military materiel. Desbassayns also convinces the Emperor in Delhi to allow a garrison of French troops to quarter in Delhi, increasing his reliance on the French to secure his realm. Increasingly, the Mughals are seen as a propped-up empire, nominally sovereign over much of the subcontinent, but with their vassals economically tying themselves more and more to the French. For the Russians, the Punjab War is a disappointment. Rather than weaken the French position in India the war has only strengthened it. Golitsyn writes to Nesselrode that combating the French in India will be a multi-decade endeavor and that the immediate war must be won on the fields of Europe.
     
    1838 -- Sibley's War
  • 1839: Sibley's War

    “The Manifest Rights of Protestant America”

    In the 1830s the American Dominion, like Britain itself, is politically dominated by a coalition that is doveish towards France. In 1832 the eleven-year premiership of the brash Andrew Muhlenberg is succeeded by the more genteel, but equally doveish First Minister Simeon Webster from Massachusetts. Webster was key to the Anglo-American economic pact as Treasury Minister in 1830 that guaranteed trade conditions across the Atlantic; in 1831 he was also instrumental in working with British Foreign Secretary Grosvenor in negotiating fishery access for New England on the Grand Banks. By that token he supports further thawing of relations with the administration in Quebec. British America, it seems, is on a firm path of rapprochement with its old adversaries beyond the mountains.

    Still, not all American politicians are so conciliatory towards the French. In April 1838 Delegate John Andrews rises in the Virginia House of Burgesses and delivers a remarkable address during a debate over reorganizing county governments in the province. Andrews represents Staunton in the legislature and is part of a growing movement known as the Yeoman Democrats, which is formed out of the old Tory agrarian party. Of late, the Shenandoah Valley has become a hotbed of this sort of discontent due to a lack of new farming opportunities. Andrews harnesses these sentiments in his speech, known to history as the “Manifest Rights of Protestant America” address. Andrews directly challenges the prevailing political winds by strongly advocating for expansionist policy, a position that’s been left mostly unspoken for over two decades.

    Andrews uses charged religious language and nationalistic rhetoric to argue for Anglo-American expansion to the west. He points to eastern Quebec as evidence the French have “abdicated all responsibility to improve the land they so strenuously claim” by leaving the borderlands to “the untamed French Indians” who “obstruct improvements with their savage need to maintain virgin lands as simple game preserves.” He also attacks the dominant Métis communities in the southern Quebec provinces as “degraded men pulled down by savagery more than the savage is enlightened into a man.” Andrews levels typically acrid rhetoric at Catholicism, decrying that “productive and spirited Protestant men of the soil in Kentucky” are “bound and chained by unholy Papist inquests,” referring to the supposed plight of Huguenots and Anglo-American settlers in French Kentucky.

    The speech is long and wide-ranging, hitting on the “manifest right and predestination” of Protestantism to spread free-thought, and its “inherent respect for the rights of man and self-reliance” contra Catholicism and that it is “past due” for Anglo-Americans to remember their tenacity and “reliance on divine Providence” to “supplant the French savages to the west.” Some lines veer dangerously close to sedition by excoriating British “abandonment” of the Dominion and their “assuredness to use us a warehouse and trading post for the benefit of destitute machinists toiling in the choked air of overcrowded factory floors in the mother country.”

    Highly controversial, the speech leads to a number of Whig delegates from eastern Virginia demanding his expulsion from the chamber. But Andrews has given voice to a long-dormant attitude in the American Dominion, particularly in the border regions where the mountains rise and stand symbolizing “the pen that holds Americans back from their destiny.” His speech is amplified by the happenstance that John Andrews is the son-in-law of the new President-General of the Dominion Henry Laurens, Lord Mepkin, recently appointed to Philadelphia by King George IV. Although Laurens is not a subscriber of Andrews’ politics–something he makes abundantly clear to the Congress and Parliament–the association enables the fiery speech to make far greater waves than if Andrews had been a typical backbencher in a provincial legislature.

    The Dominion government is increasingly wary of these sorts of radical sentiments in American society, particularly with the recent outbreak of war on the European continent. In the Dominion the official government liaison to the British government is known as the Parliamentary Minister. By the 1830s the role has developed into a sort of ad hoc foreign secretary position, given that the Dominion is beholden to Whitehall’s foreign policy. In 1838 Webster’s Parliamentary Minister Charles J. Adams, a fellow Boston man, expresses grave concerns with London that unrest in the Dominion’s backcountry could interfere with Britain’s stated neutrality in the European conflict. Grosvenor’s reply to these warnings is to remind Philadelphia that the Dominion government has full responsibility for its internal affairs and that they had best endeavor to prevent any commencement of hostilities with the Quebecois that would impact Britain’s foreign policy.

    Sibley’s Virginia Army of Kentucky

    As might be expected of John Andrews’ constituency, Augusta County Virginia is a cradle of the radical thinking expressed in his speech. Colonel Charles Allen Sibley, an ex-Continental Army Captain & militia commander in Staunton forms the military arm of the Yeoman Democratic movement. Contrary to his friend in the Burgesses, Sibley has come to the conclusion that their sentiments will not sway the provincial legislature, let alone Congress or Parliament in adopting the cause and confronting the French Indians. Col. Sibley has already resolved by the late-spring of 1838 that he will embark on a treasonous endeavor that, if successful, will force Philadelphia’s hand and potentially bring even London along with them.

    Sibley’s plan is similar to the logic of the New Richmond Uprising during Talleyrand’s War: use Anglo-American settlers in French Kentucky (Kentaké) to rise up and, hopefully, bring the Huguenots into it as well. Sibley believes this time such an effort can succeed due to a much increased Anglo-American presence in the region and increased resentment from the Huguenots towards the new King of France, who is seen as a Catholic ideologue. Indeed, the new Superintendent of southern Quebec, Louis-Pierre de Montcalm Gozon–the grandson of the war hero Marquis–is a reactionary conservative who many fear has been put in place for the purposes of cracking down on the thriving Protestantism in the New Lyons region.

    Sibley affirms these beliefs based on reports from his nephew Elijah Hornsby, a settler and mayor of Virginia’s Heart [OTL London, KY], the largest of several Anglo towns founded in southern Kentucky with Quebec’s sanction. Hornsby has spent the better part of a decade building a fifth column of Anglo-American radicals within French territory. Situated far from political power bases on the Ohio River, Hornsby’s Yeoman supporters report first hand the quality land in bountiful French Kentucky. With the insular Cherokee to the south and more established Huguenots and Anglos to the west, Hornsby views the biggest obstacle to seizing control of Kentucky to be the sparse military garrisons in the countryside and the chateaus belonging to Catholic gentry in the north. He reports as much to his uncle in Staunton using a sophisticated courier system back-and-forth from Kentucky to Virginia.

    Aside from the uprising in Kentucky, Sibley himself plans to invade Shawnee territory (Shauwanaké) from Virginia and seize French garrisons in the Appalachian mountain valleys. He quietly builds a trusted network of militia officers that will be ready to follow his commands when the time comes. Sibley is careful in his communications, wary of moderates getting wind of his plans and killing them in the cradle. Despite his secrecy, rumor reaches the Governor of Virginia, James Lee Ringgold, who demands an investigation to find evidence of the conspiracy in July, 1838. Learning of his betrayal, Sibley accelerates his plans, resolving that confrontation in Virginia may be necessary to bring freedom to Kentucky.

    On 13 July, Sibley speaks to over sixty militia officers secretly assembled at the farm of his friend Captain John Halliwell, telling the men that they represent the vanguard of a new Protestant-American nation, to be founded on the far-side of the mighty Appalachians. Sibley says they will no longer be officers in the Virginia Provincial Militia, but are the founders of a new Virginia Army of Kentucky. They are to drill their loyal men under arms four times a week and gather supplies and ordinance as quietly as they’re able until word comes from Sibley to muster and march on their objectives. He sends a message that same night to his nephew in Virginia’s Heart that plans will be put into action before the end of the summer.

    The danger of mounting such an ambitious plan in secret is that too many ears get wind of it. As his officers return to their militia units a number of loose-lips lead to information traveling back to Richmond. Governor Ringgold has the evidence he needs and issues arrest warrants for several confirmed participants in the Sibley conspiracy. Riders are dispatched to inform the Continental Army postings in the Shenandoah Valley in case local Sheriffs refuse to enforce the warrants, which is indeed what happens in early-August. When the warrants arrive in Staunton the Augusta County sheriff refuses to arrest Sibley and his allies. Sibley, mindful that time is short, orders his Virginia Army of Kentucky to muster out before Dominion forces arrive.

    Yeomen versus Continentals

    Major Archibald Bolling of the Continental Army rides north out of Forts Fairfax and Dunmore [OTL Glasgow & Roanoke, VA] in the southern Shenandoah with three companies of dragoons determined to prevent Dominion law from being violated by Sibley’s illegal army. At Steeles Tavern on 9 August, Bolling encounters Sibley’s gathering of over 5,000 Yeomen. The Yeomen refuse to disperse as ordered, even when Thoroughgood fires his pistol in the air. The Major is astonished to see the organization and equipment of the Yeomen, being in possession of a number of field pieces and wagons of powder stores and munitions apparently seized from county arsenals. With fewer than 400 dragoons, Bolling sees that he’s outmatched and decides to avoid violence, allowing Sibley to pass. He splits his dragoons, with two companies riding back to Fort Fairfax ahead of the Yeomen, while he rides to Richmond to spread word of the “rebellion in Shenandoah.”

    Sibley’s army moves southward through the Shenandoah Valley, ultimately with the goal of reaching Fort Paluelle [OTL Bellepoint, WV], which guards the west side of the mountains at the junction of the Kanawha and Bruyère [OTL Greenbriar River] rivers nearly 120 km away. Sibley’s first task though is to get past the pair of Continental Army forts that stand in his path. Fortunately for the Yeomen, the garrison at Fort Fairfax is an example of the unreadiness of the standing Continental Army. One Yeoman writes that “drunkards and layabouts command the fort at Fairfax,” and that “on average these allegedly professional soldiers would not be welcome in the ranks of the Yeoman Army.” The Yeomen march past Fort Fairfax with little difficulty, with the Continentals unwilling to fire upon their countrymen.

    Meanwhile, the Continental dragoons continue riding south to hopefully set up a roadblock at Fort Dunmore. Unfortunately for the Continentals, Fort Dunmore is in an even sorrier state than Fort Fairfax. Once again, when Sibley marches through the town of Dunmore the Continentals are unable to stop them. Indeed, the Yeomen receive plaudits from many townspeople and soldiers in Dunmore. One Continental Sergeant, evidently drunk, fires a shot at the Yeomen as they march, but he’s quickly subdued by his own men. Nearly a company’s worth of Continentals abandon their posts and actually join them, along with several dozen other men from the town. With the final Dominion fort cleared, Sibley’s forces head west into the mountains and towards Fort Paluelle.

    In Philadelphia, First Minister Webster and President-General Laurens learn of the unrest in the Shenandoah through the disconnected network of telegraph lines and couriers on 13 August. Over the next week more reports come in, including the sorry state of Continental forces in the west and the desertion of Dominion men at Dunmore. Alarm spreads throughout the Dominion government; how can their military be so unprepared that they cannot put down a rebellious militia? Eastern forces are mobilized in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia to move to the Shenandoah, but they will be weeks behind the Yeomen. Laurens issues a dispatch on a fast packet to London while Webster and his government urgently discuss what, if anything, should be told to the French administrators in Quebec.

    Kentucky Yeomen Rising

    As Sibley’s Yeoman get underway in Virginia, Elijah Hornsby’s Yeomen in French Kentucky launch their own offensive, predetermined by courier before Dominion politics forced Sibley’s hand. On 17 August over 800 militiamen from Anglo-American towns across southern Kentucky move against Fort Polignac [~OTL Corbin, KY ], which has stood watch over the region for decades. Garrisoned by a mere two companies of French colonial troops, Polignac is isolated and not expecting any organized attack from the countryside. Captain Armand Eustache d’Aoust holds command of the fort and he is surprised to see the assemblage of militia approach his posting.

    The relationship between Anglo-American settlers and French garrison towns is mutually frosty, but there had been little indication of this sort of rebellion brewing. Aoust sends riders to Fort Berthier to the south and to inform the Cherokee (Chaulakie) at Telliquois. Captain d’Aoust leaves the fort to parley with the Mayor Hornsby, who informs him that Fort Polignac now stands in the sovereign democratic state of Kentucky and that the garrison can surrender and leave or fight and die. Aoust opts to abandon the fort. The Yeoman confiscate their weapons and escort them north out of Yeoman territory where they are left to march alone towards the city of Montcalm. On 24 August, Fort Berthier [~OTL Middlesboro, KY] likewise falls to the Yeoman, but this time they are unable to capture the whole garrison, most of whom escape south to the Cherokee towns.

    While Hornsby’s men repurpose forts Polignac and Berthier (re-christened as Fort Sibley and Fort Hornsby), other Yeoman Democrats seek to spread the uprising to the heart of Protestant territory in New France, the axis of settlements to the northwest between New Lyons and New Richmond. Alderman Richard Grime is Hornsby’s strongest ally in New Richmond and strenuously whips discontent in the community against the French administration and the Catholic Church. Grimes is joined by several leading Huguenot vintners in the region, who attempt to sway French Protestants to the cause.

    The whole Yeoman cause hinges upon creating a mass uprising among the long-established settlements in Kentucky. But as happened two decades earlier, the more entrenched Prostestant communities are more conservative. Fellow Alderman in New Richmond Lawrence McClurg–son of the previous uprising’s leader–is a staunch opponent of “conspiracy and rash action.” His brother-in-law, Antoine Argent is the son of the Mayor of New Lyons and together they have helped to build close ties between the French and Anglo population centers of Kentucky. Their moderating influence overpowers Grimes’ radical sentiments, leading to a number of tense confrontations between Yeoman sympathizers and the rest of the community.

    On 23 August Guillaume Vizard, an adjutant to Superintendent Montcalm-Gozon, arrives in New Richmond. He tours the town and meets with the Mayor and the Board of Aldermen. Vizard informs them that recent unrest among “the wild bands” of breakaway Peoria people requires an increased military presence on the lower Ohio River, including a localized garrison to be based in the nearby village of Leflanc. Richard Grime, though cordial in the meeting, calls people together at the First Presbyterian meeting house after the departure of Vizard. He uses inflammatory rhetoric to describe the motives of the French administrators in the upriver city of Montcalm and warns that “Catholic soldiers will soon be making their homes alongside your own; erecting their own houses of papistry; corrupting the goodness and godliness of our streets, our schoolhouses, and our government!” He accuses Vizard of a Papist plot to “bring ruin to our towns,” branding the excuse of roving natives as “political sophistry,” a charge which is not a wholly inaccurate.

    By the late evening a mob of several hundred forms in New Richmond’s town square. Alderman McClurg and Mayor Edward Ungle address the crowd and attempt to contextualize Vizard’s visit, pointing out the reports of rebellious natives being driven out of Illinois and reminding them that there have long been Catholics living among them. Grimes responds that the Quebec administrators “run the savages here with the very purpose of the fortification and destruction of our free towns.” Still Ungle and McClurg push back, joined by several other local prominents including Argent and the town’s militia commander, Colonel Nathaniel Birch. Birch admonishes the mob to return to their homes, that their concerns are noted and valid, but that rashness can lead to nothing positive. McClurg reminds them of his father’s foibles with rebellion and that they have worked hard to make this land their home. To risk everything by drawing the ire of Montcalm is foolhardy. As the crowd begins to gradually disperse, Grimes vows to his counterparts in town leadership that he will not cease his efforts nor will he “allow our people to lie on the ground like snakes rather than protect their liberties.”

    Despite the late-August confrontation in New Richmond and several others like it, men like Grimes are unable to inspire the sort of insurrection that Hornsby and Sibley need to stage a revolution against the Quebecois in Kentucky. While settlements closer to the Ohio River refuse to engage, southern Kentucky continues to fan the flames. Hornsby can count more than thirty towns and many more farms under the control of the Yeoman. On 30 August, Hornsby hosts the Kentucky Convention behind the palisades of Fort Sibley. In his opening remarks to the men before him, including the recently arrived Colonel Sibley himself, Hornsby says the convention’s goal is to declare independence from Quebec and build a government of self-reliant yeomen citizens.

    Quebec Strikes Back

    By the second week of September though threats begin to emerge to the nascent revolutionary movement. Quebecois soldiers under Captain Alexandre Berthier and a large force of Cherokee [Chaulakie] militia under Têtedefeu, or Firehead, move against the Yeoman from the south. They near Fort Hornsby by 12 September and this time it’s the detachment of Yeomen who retreat in the face of a larger force. They arrive back at Fort Sibley warning of the Cherokee advance. The Cherokee hold a strong place in the minds of the Anglo-Americans, whose ancestors drove them out of North Carolina and Georgia. In the intervening years the Cherokee have grown into a powerful nation within southern Quebec, who are frequently used as a specter of fear in the southern Dominion. Particular animosity is felt due to the Cherokee welcoming black Americans fleeing slavery and then prejudice, with hundreds adopted into their communities. News of the “black Indians” becoming involved in their uprising is unwelcome and more Kentucky militia are rushed to Fort Sibley as reinforcements.

    To the north, Captain d’Aoust’s report of the uprising reaches the authorities in Montcalm by 25 August. The Superintendent, seated in the very city named after his grandfather, puts out a call throughout much of Sud du Lac for militia to support the regular troops in suppressing the revolt in Kentucky. Montcalm-Gozon writes to Governor-General d’Iberville, who receives his letter just after getting a warning from Philadelphia of a potential incursion by Virginia rebels into Kentucky. Iberville dispatches orders to Montcalm supporting the intervention and warning of further incursions from the British Dominion. By 14 September, Montcalm-Gozon has a 10,000 man force of militia along with 2500 men from Montcalm’s garrisons. The Quebecois forces move out of Montcalm on the 16th after Mass, moving south to the so-called State of Kentucky.

    Meanwhile, Sibley’s Virginia Army of Kentucky reaches Fort Paluelle on 14 August, taking Captain Gustav-Louis Lannes by surprise. Initially believing he is facing an actual invasion by the British Dominion, he puts all his resources into the fort’s defense, raining artillery down on Sibley’s men, scattering their formations. Not expecting the warm welcome, Sibley restructures his plans and sends a messenger to the fort with a letter identifying his forces and outlining his goals. Angered but bemused by the Virginian’s delusions of grandeur, Lannes decides not to fight to the last against the unsanctioned “Kentucky Army” and allows himself to be taken hostage in exchange for an allowance for his men to retreat to friendly ground. Sibley agrees to the terms and has the Quebecois soldiers’ weapons confiscated. A company of Yeomen are left behind at Paluelle, which Sibley rebrands as Fort Boone, and he continues onward with the bulk of his army and Lannes as his guest. The Yeomen face only minor harassment from Shawnee hunters on their march to Kentucky as they move deeper in Quebec territory.

    They reach Fort Sibley on 28 August just as Hornsby is preparing to open the Kentucky Convention. The Virginia Army of Kentucky parades through the neighboring town, now occupied by cheering Anglo-Americans rather than dour French Catholics. Sibley is hailed a hero and offered the President’s Chair at the Convention. Sibley declines, opting to take command of the local militia forces and drill them into preparedness while his Virginians rest from their long 320 km march. When news of the Cherokee’s intervention arrives on 14 September the community at Fort Sibley becomes tense. Some question whether the Convention should be moved from Fort Sibley to the north in Virginia’s Heart, but word arrives that Montcalm’s forces are marching on them from the north. It’s determined that Fort Sibley is where the Yeoman will make their stand.

    Riders are sent out to friendly towns seeking reinforcement from any militia not already committed, one of whom rides to New Richmond. Upon his arrival the rider is told by Mayor Ungle that the militia have already gone, but not to the aid of the Yeomen; the New Richmond militia have departed for Montcalm under summons from the Superintendent. When word arrives back at Fort Sibley that the Protestant men of New Richmond and New Lyons are marching against them with the Quebecois, a sense of despair falls over the Yeomen. Sibley is able to rally them to defend their infant state and the local militias make haste for Virginia’s Heart to protect their homes and harass Montcalm-Gozon’s forces as they march.

    The Virginia Army of Kentucky camps at Fort Sibley, waiting on news of the Cherokee force expected to be shortly approaching. When a pair of scouts fail to return on 19 September, Sibley’s men muster for battle, but no enemies appear. On the 20th three more riders disappear; two more on the 21st; four on the 22nd. That day the four horses return to the fort without riders, with one having a bundle of uniforms strapped to the saddle. This psychological warfare from the Cherokee continues on the night of the 23rd when the Yeomen hear whooping from the forest. A squad of soldiers is sent to investigate campfire smoke rising over the trees but return reporting an empty campsite. The next night the whooping continues, but this time six sentries are killed by marksmen from positions among the trees. Finally on 25 September Sibley is inspecting fortifications with his aide-de-camp when the man is sniped while walking next to him. The marksman is spotted and a pursuit is mounted by a pair of platoons but rounds of shots echo around Fort Sibley and only five men stumble back to camp, several bloodied.

    Several hours pass and a lone Frenchman appears on horseback holding a standard. He is granted a parley with Colonel Sibley and is revealed to be an adjutant to Captain Berthier. He tells Sibley that the Cherokee’s “cruel warfare” will cease if Fort Sibley is abandoned and all Yeomen leave Cherokee land. Sibley is loath to cave in to the natives, especially when he’s lacking basic intelligence about his opponents; unfortunately the French officer is unhelpful in that regard. Sibley decides to make a stand and sends several companies out to patrol the surrounding forests. Which ones returned the most bloodied informed the focus on the next patrol. For several days the Yeomen patrols encounter nests of marksmen and a pair of abandoned camps, but each time the Cherokee manage to slip away. On 1 October, a company of Yeomen encounters what seems to be an abandoned camp, but are then fallen upon by hundreds of Cherokee fighters. Known as the Cabbage Valley Massacre, between 85 and 100 Yeomen are killed by the Cherokee. While the bodies are not mutilated as the Yeoman would later claim, they are stripped of all clothing and possessions as trophies of war.

    While Sibley’s forces deal with the irregular fighting against the Cherokee, the local Yeoman Army are prepared to make a stand against the Quebecois at Virginia’s Heart. They make a plan to draw the Quebecois into chasing a retreating column into territory where the road is lined with cover for irregular warfare. They make a stand on 27 September at the village of Rockcastle, which hosts a bridge across a creek of the same name. Yeoman block the road as Montcalm’s vanguard companies enter the down and refuse to disperse when so ordered, causing the brief Battle of Rockcastle. After several volleys are exchanged, the Yeoman retreat across the bridge, pursued by the Quebecois who face riflemen as they cross. Yeoman irregulars are most effective in the forested, hilly terrain just south of Rockcastle, forcing temporary pauses and breaks in the Quebec advance, but once the land opens up the Quebecois make skillful use of flankers, many of them Shawnee with rifles and bladed weapons, to neuter the impact of the Yeoman irregulars. While Quebecois losses are not insignificant, their progress towards Virginia's Heart is not impeded and the Yeomen are forced to make a final stand in the town.

    Colonel Birch of New Richmond is sent by Montcalm to discuss a surrender but he is not received, with the Yeomen firing at his horse’s feet when he attempts to approach. Birch is heard to yell, “you damned rebels will mean ruin for all of us,” as he rides back toward Quebecois lines. The Battle of Virginia’s Heart on 3 October marks the end of the homegrown Kentucky Yeoman Army. Quebecois artillery breaks the rebels’ formations in less than half-an-hour and the town is occupied an hour later. Thousands of muskets and rifles are confiscated as are the stores of powder. Most of the surviving Yeoman militia are captured and kept in camps under guard, where they are eventually allowed to depart for their homes under oath to never again take up arms against the Crown of France.

    Several companies worth of men escape Virginia’s Heart and reach Fort Sibley, where the Virginia Army of Kentucky is still carrying on its slow-motion battle against the Cherokee. The men from Virginia’s Heart bring the grave news. The Kentucky Convention, led by Hornsby, decides to release their work and spread word far-and-wide in the hopes that Philadelphia or London may intervene on their behalf. The Kentucky Declaration announces the severing of “Protestant Kentucky” from “Papist Quebec,” boldly and falsely counting New Richmond and New Lyons among their peers. Over all the other eloquent verbiage in the document, this inclusion makes the document a laughing-stock from New Lyons to Philadelphia in the late-fall of 1838. Dominion President-General Laurens remarks that “these frontiersmen think themselves the army of Spartacus, when they are more Marc Antony’s.” Superintendent Montcalm-Gozon is content to consolidate control of central Kentucky, saying, “let these curs in their castle continue to bleed with the southern savages, they will not last the winter.”

    Conclusion and Aftermath

    Indeed as the weeks of skirmishing with the Cherokee continues, Yeomen begin to desert with increasing frequency, especially as cold weather closes in on the region. Sibley is increasingly frustrated by both his army and the so-called Kentucky Special Assembly, so-created by the Convention and headed by his nephew Hornsby. Sibley writes that “this alleged government is as real and effectual as a young girl who is the lady of a dollhouse.” The two men are heard having angry rows as winter closes in, but Sibley never abandons his namesake fort, even as hundreds of his men take their leave, preferring the hospitality of the Quebecois over endless skirmishing with the Cherokee.

    For their part, the Cherokee and the French company that accompanied them move to Fort Berthier for the winter, launching only periodic raids against Fort Sibley as the cold takes hold. Têtedefeu returns to Telliquois as a war hero for the Cherokee, who see Sibley’s War as a vengeance against the Anglo-Americans who fought so brutally against them for generations. For the relatively isolated Cherokee, their participation in the fighting leads to deeper connections with the Quebecois, rather than their traditional partnerships with French outposts in Louisiana to the southwest. For the Cherokee, Sibley’s War begins a long trend of integration and participation into Quebecois society.

    For the Protestants of the Ohio in New Richmond and New Lyons, their loyalty to Quebec pays off with few recriminations from Montcalm, other than the increased administrative presence in the area leading to a slightly more heterogeneous character in the old Huguenot towns. The Yeoman Democrat faction led by Alderman Grimes is well-discredited and the movement is forced to moderate heavily, with many of the most radical voices like Grimes leaving the region entirely.

    By late-winter 1839 it’s clear even to the radical members of the Kentucky Special Assembly that their dreams for a self-reliant, Protestant yeoman state in Kentucky will not come to pass. While several of the most strident militia commanders lead a small group of men into the countryside to mount an irregular campaign against the Quebecois, Sibley and Hornsby decamp for Virginia’s Heart on 5 March. They are both placed under arrest and eventually Sibley and the Virginian’s under his command are marched back to the Dominion where they will face justice. Despite negotiations to avoid it, Hornsby and the other leaders of Kentucky settlers are to be kept in Quebec to be tried for treason against the French Crown. Ultimately only Hornsby and two other men are hanged, while two dozen more are deported to the Dominion. Most of the insurrectionists are allowed to return to their towns and farms upon making an oath on pain of death to the Crown. The few who refuse are required to leave Quebec, but most take the offer. Thus Sibley’s War comes to an end with a relative whimper and not the grand revolution envisioned by its proponents.

    In the Dominion, the insurrection inspires a round of reforms to the Continental Army, which had so spectacularly failed to prevent it. First Minister Webster also pushes through legislation for a robust Interior Ministry at the Dominion level that will have its own marshals to execute warrants issued in Dominion courts. President-General Laurens, while embarrassed through his association with John Andrews, receives much credit from London for maintaining the peace between the British Dominion and French Quebec through the whole affair. Andrews is forced to resign his post in the Burgesses and Sibley is hanged for treason in June, 1839. While Yeoman Democracy continues to be popular in the west, explicit expansionism fades as a major platform; indeed the radical expansionists Yeoman Democrats now see the Dominion as too weak to accomplish their mission of expansion. Enterprising minds who believe in the concept of “manifest destiny” for American Protestants to expand their culture and society begin to seek new destinations to put their ideology into practice.
     
    Last edited:
    Winter 1838-39
  • French Politics & Winter War Planning

    On the week of 10 November 1838 the new Grand Councils of State of France open for the first time in Paris. The Assembly of Notables, representing French commoners, convenes with great fanfare at the Palais du Luxembourg, reclaimed by the Crown after the death of the Count of Provence. The 400 delegates chosen from the arrondissements of France are in general much more conservative than at the Estates General because candidates for the body are vetted by the Maison de Roi. Still, a large caucus of mainstream liberals is included. The Assembly does not have any legislative powers, but debates topics of importance, can call for testimony from officials, and makes recommendations to the King and government in an advisory role. Staunch conservative Pascal Depardieu emerges as the leader of the majority faction in the Assembly that becomes known as the Conservatives. The former Justice Minister Alphonse de Grouchy becomes the leader of the liberal faction, which is known as the Reformists.

    News from the war front dominates debate in the chamber. The debate centers around instituting mass conscription to better prosecute the war. The issue reveals tensions in the newly established political blocs. The Conservative-aligned military faction is wary of an influx of green soldiers, while others in the faction are enthusiastically in favor of mass conscription for the benefit of bringing glory to the French realm. The Reformist camp is also split, with some fearing the power that conscription would give to the Crown and others seeing it as an opportunity to deepen egalitarianism in the ranks of the military. Ultimately a compromise package is settled upon that is delivered to King Henri.

    The proposal has no legislative power and Henri is free to ignore or amend it as he pleases by decree, but he grants his general assent and forwards the proposal to his government to determine the particulars. The implementation of the levée en masse does not bear fruit for over a year as the military has many criticisms and processes it wants to work out before throwing untold thousands of inexperienced conscripts into battle alongside professional corps. The decision prompts similar planning in Spain and Naples, as well as among the Coalition, particularly the Russians. The advent of mass conscription will greatly change the face of European warfare.

    With news of the sovereign nationalist uprisings in Genoa and Savoy, and sympathetic sentiments spreading across the members of the Holy Alliance, Leader Depardieu begins to articulate a new ideology in the Assembly of Notables. Supported by a cottage industry of royalist political writers, Depardieu promotes the ideology of redemptor nationalism, which is designed to underpin Bourbon empire building and sidelines the nation-state in favor of a cultural nationalism tied to shared history and imperial might. Not only France, but Spain and Italy too, share in the antiquarian bond of Roman heritage on which the modern countries were built.

    The goal of redemptor nationalism, according to its proponents, is to redeem that heritage and put the nations of people who share it in a place of elevated power with common purpose. It proves to be controversial, even among the conservative faction, which includes many who are wary of closer unions with the likes of Spain and Italy. The King, however, is a proponent of the ideology and sees it as a useful counter against the tide of sovereign nationalist movements that threaten to fracture the dominion of monarchs across Europe.

    The redemptorist movement also helps justify the ongoing crackdown on Truthists by connecting them to the sovereign nationalists. Thousands of Truthists and other radical liberals are arrested in the winter of 1839, mostly on charges of sedition, espionage, lése majesté, and treason. Many others flee to the Rhineland, the Netherlands, or Britain as political refugees from the oppression of Henri. By the end of the war’s second year, political dissent, especially radical dissent, has been mostly silenced in France.

    Though dissent to Henri’s rule and the personal union of France and Spain is suppressed, the government’s explicit connection between the Truthist and sovereign nationalist movements serves to build a unifying bridge between these dissenting ideologies. This cooperation between northern European Truthists and southern European sovereign nationalists plants the seeds for future radical movements against the prevailing ideologies in the West.

    Within the French government there are other efforts to further support the war effort in the coming year. In January, Foreign Minister Duhamel finally achieves the formal support of the Rheinbund, as the bloc formally declares war on the Coalition. Rhenish corps are mobilized for the spring campaign season and fortifications are improved in anticipation of a Coalition thrust against Hessia. Factories in the Ruhr increasingly shift towards a war industry, churning out arms and ammunition for the Alliance at impressive rates in anticipation of general conscription.

    Additionally, an embargo is levied against the Coalition countries, to be enforced by Alliance naval assets. France, Spain, and Naples move to effectively blockade Coalition ports in the Baltic and Adriatic Seas, and a squadron was dispatched to patrol the Aegean against Russian incursions through the Dardanelles. At its inception the embargo was incomplete, with enforcement primarily done via the blockades and with no provision to require neutral nations to avoid overland trade with Coalition partners. This loophole led to many instances of otherwise neutral nations, such as Britain, trading war materiel to the Coalition via other neutral ports, such as those in Hanover, or Denmark.

    One of the early enforcement actions of the blockade occurrs in the Baltic Sea on 13 February when a Russian flotilla attempts to use the straits in the Gulf of Riga to evade the French Navy. At the Battle of Soela Strait a French squadron decisively destroyes the Russian blockade runners. That same month, the FM Duhamel secures support from Sweden in enforcement of the embargo, closing the Russia trade to Swedish merchants. The French pledge to make up for lost Russian trade for the Swedes in exchange, as well as lend support to any military actions the Swedes want to take against Russia and Prussia.

    The Alliance moves into 1839 confident that the missteps of 1838 will not be repeated and that they’re now prepared to hold off the expected Coalition onslaught into the next decade, when the fruits of general conscription will come to bear.
     
    Last edited:
    1839 Part 1
  • Trickling this out bit by bit...

    1839 Part 1

    New Leadership
    In November 1838 and February 1839, two crowns change hands amidst a Europe at war. In Britain, the long-infirm George IV succumbs to a pulmonary illness. With no children to his name, his brother Edward Augustus takes the crown as Edward VII. Edward shares his brother’s relative ambivalence towards the European continent although he does have a particular fondness for Hanover due to spending a good portion of his adolescence there. While he is clear that any threat to Hanoverian neutrality by belligerents will not be tolerated, Edward will continue to be an obstacle in Britain against the small, but growing, interventionist camp that is clamoring for Britain to join the Coalition against France’s Holy Alliance. An increasing number of liberal refugees from Henri’s realm arrive in Britain by the week in the winter of 39-39, adding their voices to the interventionist camp. Despite the loud clamoring of the interventionists, the isolationist camp continues to hold sway in Parliament and the king’s government.

    In Bavaria, Karl I, who had been essentially deposed by his son Johan in 1837 after the betrothal crisis, finally dies in February. Johan I formally ascends to the Bavarian throne and promptly joins the Coalition against the Holy Alliance. He leverages the new marriage alliance between his son Albert and Princess Augusta Carolina of Franconia to convince her father, Grand Duke Ludwig von Hohenlohe, to follow suit in March. This move would allow Coalition forces to attack the Alliance beyond the narrow Saxony front, creating the potential for a lengthened front line between the Rhineland and the Coalition powers in southern Germany. If the Alliance cannot conclude the war by the end of the year, Bavaria and Franconia will be fully mobilized in support of the Coalition.

    Second German Campaign Part 1
    The Coalition lays considerable intelligence groundwork for the 1839 Saxony offensive in the late-winter, arranging formations and leaking misinformation that suggests a major attack against Gotha to open up the campaign. In fact, the wiley Austrian Schwartzenberg plans for the main thrust of the attack to swing well north of Gotha and engage more isolated Alliance corps that are less prepared for an onslaught; he only stages a feint towards Erfurt and Gotha with a contingent of Russian troops. He places command of the vanguard in the able leadership of Prussian Friedrich Wilhelm von Brandt. Brandt, an old veteran of Prussia’s war against Sweden, is known for his meticulous planning. The Coalition’s goal is to push the Alliance forces out of Saxony and ensure a solid foothold in the Rhineland that will be capitalized upon by the main Austrian army under Schwartzenberg. The ultimate objective of the campaign is to seize Frankfurt, opening up the field to cross the Rhine near Hagenau and thrust into France herself.

    Alliance commanders believe that the main thrust of the Coalition’s offensive will be directed at Erfurt and Gotha and so Marshal Maupeou arranges the bulk of the Alliance forces between the two cities, expecting waves of assaults from the Coalition. In fact, the opening occurs in late April near the Saxon village of Greußen, about a day’s ride north of Erfurt. Three Alliance corps under the command of the formidable generals Henri de Valcourt of France and Sebastian von Neurath of the Rhineland are garrisoned outside the village. While they are braced against the approaching Coalition forces, they do not expect more than the first wave under Brandt and so Valcourt is surprised to receive reconnaissance reports that the bulk of Schwartzenberg’s army is bearing down on them. Valcourt is known for his aggressive style and Neurath has a keen understanding of terrain and they mount a spirited effort at the Battle of Greußen. Together they utilize the landscape to the Alliance's advantage as Brandt’s forces stage themselves, successfully holding back the Coalition force for three days. However, upon the Austrians’ arrival, the Coalition’s superior numbers and meticulously crafted strategies gain the upper hand on the fourth day after an intensive all-night artillery barrage. Despite the valiant efforts of the Alliance soldiers, the Coalition's multi-pronged approach means that the Alliance forces find themselves increasingly outflanked. This strategic disadvantage, coupled with mounting casualties, leaves Valcourt with little choice but to tactically retreat.
     
    Top