Who took Eisenhower's OTL position in warplanning in this war?
I was thinking Mark Clark also. He was already in WashingtonMark Clark, or too junior at this point? He was Ike's guy in North Africa
As in, "man whose plan for seizing a narrow mountainous peninsula when we have complete naval and aerial supremacy in the region is to land in the south and march up its entire length" Mark Clark? "Taking Rome for personal glory is more important than trapping and destroying the local German army" Mark Clark?
I'm not sure that's a good thing.
Mark Clark was an idiot,not in McArthur's league but he did manage to totally screw up the Italian campaign.Mark Clark, or too junior at this point? He was Ike's guy in North Africa
Guys, the Mark Clark critiques are valid but irrelevant. We have the benefit of hindsight. Remember, Fredendall was a rising star too.
OTL Mark Clark was good friends with Ike. Clark was also Asst Army G-3 under McNair. Marshall selected him to teach at the Army War College. I am not advocating giving him command of Torch. But at this time Clark was a good staff officer in the right place to be available. Maybe he can learn something early and redeem himself in this timelineAs in, "man whose plan for seizing a narrow mountainous peninsula when we have complete naval and aerial supremacy in the region is to land in the south and march up its entire length" Mark Clark? "Taking Rome for personal glory is more important than trapping and destroying the local German army" Mark Clark?
I'm not sure that's a good thing.
Why the dislike for McNair?If he could arrange a fatal accident for Lesley McNair, ASAP, that'd be great...
I was just about to post that, since I assumed that's where the enmity came from.Coaster,
Ah, that old myth.
Best give this a watch then. It puts paid to McNair's being a villain of any sort. And it puts paid to the idea that the US was under equipped against German armor. And it puts paid to the whole anti-tank myths as well...
Thorr covers it nicely. In addition to all those armor myths being false, McNair was also very effective in organizing, training, equipping, et cetera the new army. His staff and organizational skills and their effect on the combat readiness of U.S. Army units should not be underestimated.Other than the fact that his stubbornness in refusing to reconsider his position on separate dedicated anti-tank units resulted in the US being woefully under equipped when fighting German armor, resulting in horrible casualties for US tankers AND infantry?
Whichever B-17 dropped that bomb that took him out probably saved 100x more lives than that bomb killed.
I was just about to post that, since I assumed that's where the enmity came from.
Thorr covers it nicely. In addition to all those armor myths being false, McNair was also very effective in organizing, training, equipping, et cetera the new army. His staff and organizational skills and their effect on the combat readiness of U.S. Army units should not be underestimated.
OTL Mark Clark was good friends with Ike. Clark was also Asst Army G-3 under McNair. Marshall selected him to teach at the Army War College. I am not advocating giving him command of Torch. But at this time Clark was a good staff officer in the right place to be available. Maybe he can learn something early and redeem himself in this timeline
How about Lucian Truscott?
Six weeks into the shooting war (for the US anyways); and we've got more casualties in the command level for the Army and Navy than the same point in history. To be sure, the combat has been intense on several fronts. With those losses/wounds to top officers, different commanders will need to emerge - by default...
It puts paid to McNair's being a villain of any sort