Could see it happen, to be honest only medium land conflicts on Europe I can see otherwise happening would be either Poland getting someone a bit crazy in power or it facing some revolts from the poor/socialists and it dragging some ''friends'' with ideas on how to exploit it getting into fights with other friends and that seems unlikely.
I’d rather have them being busy (and weakened) by the European squabble than seriously (on wwii level) involved on the Pacific. Anyway, the technology of the early XX is not going to produce the same destruction as in 1940s.So some tiff that results in a ''small'' war that inflicts a lot more damage than any of the imperial powers thought would happen given how interconnected they are with each other and makes them reconsider would make sense, maybe with a radical or two cheering it on hoping to exploit the aftermath.
I myself think the idea of Manchurian state, after some more attempts at keeping a status quo of unitary state dragging in the imperial powers into a limit war would make sense.
For better or worse Britain's been paranoid and hyping it's populace up on the threat of Russia to India and talking itself into a fight would strike hoping both to show it's superiority and a limited engagement of its pride and joy the navy would workout well.
Indeed.Of course once fighting happens it tends to escalate as people get crazier ideas and demands so could easily drag in others wanting to cash on it.
What do you mean?Woodrow Wilson is still US president ITTL, day ruined
In this context, yes. A preaching prick with an empty head full of the crazy ideas.Nobody likes Woodrow Wilson
I think something interesting is USA and Mexico. Mexico still has most of the north, but still has the same problems that Mexico OTL had. It is much more populated and rich.
When I said that having the north would only make them have a wider border. The border would be much more difficult to monitor, with that more immigrants could cross.
On the other hand, the USA is less populated and they don't have the Southwest. There are more than 70 million people who are no longer here. They also don't have Hawaii,
plus the entire West Coast is much less populated. I highly doubt they would become the superpower they are without Europe self-destructing.
First of all, it can move to Mexico if situation is secure and the taxes are low. Or it can move to the Northern CA or to the US part of Nevada, or to Florida, etc. As certain Englishman with a wart put it, “'Go to hell or to Connacht”. They’d find some place.The first thing I remember is that Hollywood doesn't exist, where do you think the American film industry would move?
As I understand the main factors were:The part about them moving to Mexico is actually hilarious. I don't know how that would be exactly, on the other hand, I also saw that they moved to Florida but for various reasons they moved to California. On the other hand, immigration problems would do wonders for the demography of certain areas.
Why don’t you start a TL with Hollywood in Mexico? I don’t know LA area well enough to go into any defails.Who cares, since you said possibly in Mexico that idea doesn't leave my mind. Because it would be very funny, for various reasons to settle in the area again.
It sounds so funny how they just went to another country because I let them do whatever. It looks very interesting.
Moreso in the the sense that you can't use otl as background.Why not February 1917? Anyway, this is Russia-wank, not Russia-screw so neither date is relevant.
Asides from being a racist fuck who removed the few chances black people had for social mobility in the federal government by doing things like segregating the navy and being responsible for the first resurgence of the KKK by showing the Birth of a Nation in the Whitehouse (he himself being a Lost Cause "historian") and praising it to hell and back. He was also the one who was the main diplomat of America in Versailles and essentially did his 13 Points but also ignored the likes of Ho Chin Mih and helped leave a continent that would see war in 20 years again, not to mention his intervention in the Russian Civil War as well as the Red Scare afterwards would implement an example of government using it's power to do ilegal actions and deporting people in order to "maintain order"What do you mean?
Agree on everything except one thing: “Birth of a Nation”, besides being a racist (*), was (is) a great piece of art with a lot of cinematographic innovations, which makes an issue quite complicated. However, I strongly suspect that WW was watching it not due to its artistic merits.Asides from being a racist fuck who removed the few chances black people had for social mobility in the federal government by doing things like segregating the navy and being responsible for the first resurgence of the KKK by showing the Birth of a Nation in the Whitehouse (he himself being a Lost Cause "historian") and praising it to hell and back. He was also the one who was the main diplomat of America in Versailles and essentially did his 13 Points but also ignored the likes of Ho Chin Mih and helped leave a continent that would see war in 20 years again, not to mention his intervention in the Russian Civil War as well as the Red Scare afterwards would implement an example of government using it's power to do ilegal actions and deporting people in order to "maintain order"
Tempting but I don’t know enough of the situation to say something meaningful except that Russian invasion of it was not realistic. 😉How about India?
It sounds like a scenario that could screw up the British Empire permanently and with some shenanigans it could include other contenders.
Having the American Isolationists be more successful would be a huge boost for the U.S. staying out of WWI. Having Wilson maintain his platform of isolationism while the U.S. becomes more anti-UK instead of anti-Germany (due to events before and during WWI) is likely how it's going to happen, but we'll see how it pans out.I’m still trying to figure out a plausible scenario for mini-wwi which would keep the US out of picture and probably it should be “the Bad Ugly Brits” or their ally (Italy?) doing something nasty, which would preclude sympathies of the American public. Maybe something like a belated Boer War combined with Italian-Turkish War and something else? Italian atrocities in Libya could be overlooked (killed natives, who cares)but surely the poor brave white Boers are just calling for a sympathy (ITTL territory of OTL Transvaal was left somewhat in a limbo with Brits getting “right” to it but not definitely moving to it immediately so the Dutch settlers from Cape can move into the area, declare an independent state, etc. Wilhelm may go further than in OTL in his Boers’ support and he is a good guy.