As an aside I've just been making some minor adjustments to the chapter headers, but War Means Killing Pt. 2 premiers tomorrow...
I'm fairly new to this timeline but I gotta say, I really like it. I'm interested in how you're going to have the war progress, and what you're going to do with Lee. I like how you've had A.S. Johnston not die and continue to lead forces in the West, that should be cool to see. I get the feeling, through subtle cues in your story, that you're gonna have the union win the war in the end. I kinda hope I'm wrong cause I feel like that is pretty unlikely to occur with Britain now at war with the north. I hope you talk about the French soon because I imagine they would definitely get involved. Anyways, pretty cool timeline and I'm definitely keeping a lookout for any updates. Good luck!
I find it understandable that many regard A. S. Johnston as disappointing, or incompetent on the level of Polk. I respectfully disagree. Many cite the mistakes Johnston made in 1861-62, yet it must be considered that he was expected to perform a herculean task (protect the CS heartland) with a pitifully small force (for the job required of them). Few commanders could have done a good job with this, and many would have done worse than he did.Thank you! I'm glad you're enjoying it! A. S. Johnston living to me is my attempt to explore a "what if" in the West, like having C. F. Smith survive as well, but he's off in Canada
Well I won't give any details for how the war ends, but I will be mentioning the French to some extent later on. They'll be larger players once 1863-64 rolls around I can give away...
If you've got any questions, queries, or suggestions throw them my way
I find it understandable that many regard A. S. Johnston as disappointing, or incompetent on the level of Polk. I respectfully disagree. Many cite the mistakes Johnston made in 1861-62, yet it must be considered that he was expected to perform a herculean task (protect the CS heartland) with a pitifully small force (for the job required of them). Few commanders could have done a good job with this, and many would have done worse than he did.
The only thing I will fault him is for is Fort Donelson. Due to not committing to defending the fort early enough, he wound up throwing away the equivalent of a corps.
A question: what might our assessment of certain commanders have been had they died earlier? For example:
Grant killed at Belmont: similar to Nathaniel Lyon, bold, aggressive, and willing to take risks. Like Lyon, it's possible he could have become a great commander, but it's hard to say.
Lee in West Virginia: while he might have been renowned in the Old Army, Lee showed very little indication of being able to control his subordinates, and failed miserably in the attacks at Rich Mountain.
Sherman at Shiloh: an average commander, but his dismissal of his pickets before the main Confederate attacks shows a dangerous level of negligence. It would seem an adequate epitaph would be: "Serves you right."
When can we expect the next update of this timeline? Also, how often do you update? I'm pretty excited for this battle, looks like Lee will be making an appearance. Taking over the army perhaps?
Things are going too well for the Union, I think something will go awry for them in the coming day...
Things are going too well for the Union, I think something will go awry for them in the coming day...
Well there are more than a few issues awaiting in the wings for the Union. The biggest problem for them is while they are doing about as well as can be expected and it most certainly not going their way the matter is still in contention and they know the fuse is burning (in fact the supply of fuse cord may well be one of those upcoming issues).
So is this just Maccellan screaming for more men or is he actually outnumbered