The Union Forever: A TL

1944-1947: Domestic Affairs
1944-1947

Part 1: Domestic Affairs


1944 Presidential Election
63-830.jpg

President Vernon Kirkman shaking hands with the Chief Justice on the day of his inauguration.

After four prosperous in somewhat uneventful years in office, President Vernon Kirkman and Vice President Buchholz were easily renominated by the Democratic Party for a second term. At the Republican National Convention in Richmond, Virginia the GOP was deeply divided and was unable to form a ticket until the twelfth ballot. The Republicans finally settled on Jasper V. Richards the amiable governor of Colorado and Harold McCann a former senator from Maine as his running mate. Many Republicans were less than thrilled by the lackluster nominees, which Leroy Connor, the progressive governor of Georgia, decried as “the only two Americans more boring than Kirkman and Buchholz”. Also to Connor’s frustration, the Republican platform shied away from embracing the growing civil rights movement preferring to play it safe and stick to their usual message of a more robust foreign policy and larger military. Many political scientists have argued that the Republicans selection of the stodgy 72 year old Richards to run against the 46 year old Kirkman, then the youngest president in American history, was unwise. Unsurprisingly, Kirkman beat Richards winning nearly 54% of the popular vote. At his second inauguration, Kirkman pledged that his administration would “maintain the harmony of the status-quo” words that years later Kirkman would come to regret.


The Civil Rights Movement Intensifies

civil-rights-birmingham.jpg

Demonstrators in North Carolina
1945​

During President Kirkman’s second term the American civil rights movement began to gain momentum fueled in part by Kirkman’s apparent indifference. Around the country an ever increasing number of Americans began demonstrating and challenging segregation. Reformers in the America South were joined by several notable activists from the states of Cuba and Santo Domingo where racial attitudes tended to be more progressive than in some areas of the mainland. The most famous of which would be Thomas Reynoso a lawyer from San Cristobal in Santo Domingo. A light skinned man of mixed decent with a gift for oratory, Reynoso was jailed numerous times as he refused to abide by the “Whites Only” signs which segregated most Southern public facilities. Although many segregationists dismissed Reynoso as a “damn miscegenated Carib” Reynoso always maintained that he was first and foremost an American and as such entitled to the same treatment as any purebred white man. Another aspect that aided the Civil Rights movement was the large number of nonwhite professional athletes and musicians who were during the 1940s coming to the forefront of American pop culture.

Building of the Lincoln Memorials

emancipation+statue+-+lincoln+head+on.jpg

Color photograph from the Abraham Lincoln Memorial​

After lobbying by the Republican congressional minority, President Kirkman secured the necessary funds from Congress for the construction of a memorial in Washington D.C. to honor Presidents Abraham and Robert Lincoln. Designed by the Puerto Rican architect Solomon Salcido, the twin Lincoln memorials were constructed south of the White House on the banks of the Potomac River. Made of white marble, the semicircular monuments each housed a seated statue of their respective president who faced each other across a 76 yard colonnade. President Kirkman dedicated the monuments himself, demonstrating that the Lincolns were no longer considered the nemeses of the Democrats but had finally taken their place in the pantheon of American heroes.

Birth of Groove Music

recycled-vinyl-record-crafts-1.jpg

Starting in the early 40s, a new form of music began to crop up in several American cities. Known as Groove, it combined elements from Delta, Ruckus, Sawmill, and Gospel music. The genre’s popularity grew rapidly throughout the decade despite some traditionalists’ claims that it was a corrupting influence on America’s young people. Without a doubt, the most popular musician of this new style of music was Danny “Funky” Turpin. Turpin, who originally started as a Gospel singer in Atlanta, would sell millions of records earning him the title the “King of Groove”. That Turpin was black naturally didn’t sit well with segregationists but the widespread popularity of his music with white audiences is today seen as an important step towards integration.
 
Last edited:
Excellent update. I particularly like the way you're advancing the musical scene in this TL.

I have to ask if the Polynesian/Micronesian population of the country (small as it probably is) has any place in the civil rights movement? I suspect it is going along much quicker with the addition of the Caribbean population, especially with regards to the probable large number of Hispanic senators/representatives in congress with Santo Domingo, Puerto Rico, and Cuba being states, and having incorporated territories in South/Central America.

I also predict Guadeloupe and martinique making statehood soon, or at least I can hope.
 
Excellent update. I particularly like the way you're advancing the musical scene in this TL.

I have to ask if the Polynesian/Micronesian population of the country (small as it probably is) has any place in the civil rights movement? I suspect it is going along much quicker with the addition of the Caribbean population, especially with regards to the probable large number of Hispanic senators/representatives in congress with Santo Domingo, Puerto Rico, and Cuba being states, and having incorporated territories in South/Central America.

I also predict Guadeloupe and martinique making statehood soon, or at least I can hope.

Good points. America's Polynesian/Micronesian population isn't really a large player in the civil rights movement due to thier relatively small number and the fact that they reside in the territories. In fact, they are benefiting more from the civil rights movement than actually contributing to it.

I'm actually working on a flag for Guadeloupe and Martinique right now, but would be excited to see any proposals. :)
 
Good points. America's Polynesian/Micronesian population isn't really a large player in the civil rights movement due to thier relatively small number and the fact that they reside in the territories. In fact, they are benefiting more from the civil rights movement than actually contributing to it.

I'm actually working on a flag for Guadeloupe and Martinique right now, but would be excited to see any proposals. :)

wikipedia said:
The snake flag of Martinique has no official status on the island. It is a historical flag dating from an edict issued 4 August 1766, specifying that vessels of the French Colony of Martinique and Saint Lucia should fly a version of the French ensign, which at the time was a white cross on a blue field, with L-shaped (for Lucia) snakes in each quarter of the cross.

750px-Flag_of_Martinique_svg.png

Hm... Unoffical status, historic precedent, looks pretty cool... The 'Lucia' part doesn't exactly fit but that definition can be forgotten about.


Guadeloupe also has an unofficial flag, I'll throw it up on a second post. It could simply have it's Fleur-de-lis upper third removed perhaps?

These are the boring OTL ideas. I'm fairly confidant someone can come up with something original.

750px-Flag_of_Martinique_svg.png
 
I think it looks better retaining the original black.
Your call

Flag%20of%20Guadeloupe.png


And might I remark that either way, that's a pretty badass flag?

Edit: Are Saint Martin and Saint Barthélemy included in the state, and if so what will the name of the new state be? If they're just going to remain unincorporated territories, I could see the state simply being called "Guadeloupe and Martinique" but if these other small islands/piece of an island are included, maybe something else?

Flag%20of%20Guadeloupe.png
 
Last edited:
Nice work, referring to both MacGregor's update and the state flag ideas :)

As an aside, what would Groove sound like to *our ears? I'm trying to wrap my head around what each of these genres corollate to IOTL.
 
Nice work, referring to both MacGregor's update and the state flag ideas :)

As an aside, what would Groove sound like to *our ears? I'm trying to wrap my head around what each of these genres corollate to IOTL.

FleetMac, thanks for your support.

Excellent question. Roughly speaking TUF's American music genres to our ears would sound like the following.

Gospel: Very similar to OTL Gospel.
Delta: A mix of OTL Blues with some Jazz.
Ruckus: Jazz with a heavy Latin twist.
Sawmill: Closer to Bluegrass than OTL Country. Makes heavy use of the fiddle.
Groove: Similar to OTL Rock and Roll. Groove’s primary instruments are guitar, base, drums, and sometimes brass instruments which makes it sound a little like OTL Swing music.

Let me know if there are any more questions. Cheers!
 
So it seems that technologically, this world is on par with ours, but socially and culturally it's a little ahead of our time. Is this an accurate assessment?
 
So it seems that technologically, this world is on par with ours, but socially and culturally it's a little ahead of our time. Is this an accurate assessment?

Yes and no. America is definitely more progressive on racial issues than OTL but mostly the same on other areas socially. Womens rights are even a little behind OTL due to the lack of a Second World War. The rest of the world, especially Europe is probably more socially conservative than OTL also due to the lack of a second world war.

Technologically it is much more varied. In some areas the world is ahead of OTL like in TV, but in others it lags behind like in sonar and radar.
 
In addition, I believe that one area of tech development that would be considerably behind OTL's level of progress is military/weapons technology. True, we have nuclear weapons in the 20th century, as well as being considerably more advanced in rocketry (we managed to reach Mars by 2011, after all ;)), but without a Second World War or any more major conflicts during the century* I can see these items in particular not even existing (or if so, at a highly atavic state):

1-A) Aircraft carriers; something tells me that without any experimentation into naval aviation in general (which ISTR was absent ITTL's Great War), there won't be any replacing the battleship as queen of the seas,

1-B) Aircraft in general; for all we know, the aircraft used in the Great War aren't any more advanced than what existed IOTL (to wit, overpowered gliders from which one could do arty spotting, or drop hand bombs/fire small arms from). This IMHO would likely preclude any development in jet fighters or helicopters/autogyros/etc., and certainly no strategic bombers (no trench stalemate to break by bombing major cities, remember?), unless said development happened "off-screen" as it were,

2) Guided missiles; while rocketry development has gone ahead, there remains the issue of guiding said rockets anywhere meaningful (air-to-air, air-to-ground, ground-to-air, etc.), like you said WRT radar,

3) Automatic weapons; actually, there could be a somewhat high level of development here if the French go ahead with some of their projects at an earlier stage, and the Coalition decides to ape them in order to stay ahead. This is far from certain though,

4) Tanks; yes, the "battle-cats" get a mention around Operation Titanic towards the end of the war. That still doesn't mean they necessarily evolve past being moving metal walls for the infantry to follow, let alone acting as MBTs in the way we understand them, and finally

5) Satellites; we can surmise from the level of progress in space travel that we can park items in orbit fairly easily (the Germans managed it with the Frieden), but we don't know whether or not electronics managed to miniaturize to the necessary point to allow satellite communications. This potentially means no GPS, no Dish Network-type TV, no long-range tactical communications, and no cell phones.

Not trying to burst anybody's bubble or be a stick in the mud, just a reminder that, without an ersatz line of development in either war or peace-time, much of technology as we know it might be absent. This is especially true on the battlefield.

*EDIT: Yes, I know there were two other major wars in the 20th., namely the Chinese Civil War and the Indian Independence War. However, can we really expect there to be any innovation borne from those conflicts? They're civil actions both, and likely fought as much with thrown stones and car bombs as anything high-tech. IDK, maybe I'm missing something there, just a gut feeling.
 
1944-1947: Foreign Developments
1944-1947

Part 2: Foreign Developments

Rise of Anti-Colonialism in India

india.jpg

Indian Protestors
1946​

The 1940s saw a dramatic increase in anti-colonial sentiment in India, an acceleration of a trend that had been building since the end of the Great War. Despite numerous petitions, the British government repeatedly failed to adequately deal with the Indians' calls for greater autonomy and reform. Indians themselves were also divided on what the political future of India should look like. Some, such as the Loyal Indian Society (LIS) wished to see India join the British Commonwealth as a self governing dominion along the lines of Canada or Australia. Others wished for India to become an independent state free from the British crown such as the Indian Independence Party (IIP). Further complicating matters were the myriad of smaller parties and organizations which campaigned for a variety of different goals such as Krulikism, socialism, or greater regional and ethnic autonomy. As the decade wore on, street clashes between these groups and British troops and police became more and more common with several resulting in the loss of life. Naturally these incidents further exacerbating Anglo-Indian tensions.

The Bolivian-Peruvian Alliance

MAMERTO_URRIOLAGOITIA_HARRIAGUE.jpg

Celso Serrano
President of Bolivia​

Following the successful showdown with Paraguay over the Chaco region in 1930, the dictatorial government of President Celso Serrano solidified its hold over Bolivian society. Over the next 15 years he violently pushed Bolivia into the twentieth century making significant gains in modernizing the nation’s economy, infrastructure, and military. By 1945, Serrano sought to extend Bolivia’s influence in South America. On the 5th of July, Serrano signed the Treaty of Cobija with Peruvian autocrat General Elbio Paz Armenta. The treaty was a a renewal of the alliance between Bolivia and Peru during the late 19th Century and was focused on regaining lost territory from Chile and countering the influence of America and its democratic allies in the region.

Manuel_A_Odria.jpg

Elbio Paz Armenta
President of Peru

Break up of British Indochina

attachment.php

Flag of the British Protectorate of Indochina (1911-1945)

The area of southwest Asia known as Indochina was first brought fully under European rule by the French in the early 1880s. In June of 1909 during the Great War, British forces marched east from Burma into the northern region of the territory known as Tonkin. A few months later Australian and New Zealand forces made landings near Saigon and Hue. After the war the Treaty of Brussels awarded Indochina to the United Kingdom. For the next three decades, the British nominally ruled the territory under the official title the Protectorate of Indochina. European rule came to an end in February, 1945 when the British government under the Liberal Prime Minister Isaac Pickering unilaterally decided to grant the area independence under the name the Indochinese Federation. Britain’s decision to do so was based less on egalitarian principles and more on the realization of growing administration cost, increasing native resistance, and the need for British troops in other colonies deemed more vital by the government.

The Indochinese Federation, which was designed to be closely aligned with the British Commonwealth lasted less than three years when it dissolved in the autumn of 1947 along ethnic lines. The largest of the successor states was the reconstituted Empire of Vietnam. With its capital in the city of Hue along the Perfume River, this new state was lead by Emperor Chung Pham. Although the empire had a constitution and parliament, the real power remained concentrated in the hands of the Emperor and the newly formed Imperial Vietnamese Army (IVA) both of which favored authoritarian and anti-western policies. To the northwest of Vietnam, the Lao people established the Kingdom of Laos with a constitutional monarchy and parliament based on the British model. In what was formally known as Cambodia, a civil war broke out after the British withdrawal. After nearly four years of fighting, Colonel Norodom Vam eventually gained control of the country and founded the State of Kampuchea. Norodom Vam and Chung Pham’s rise to power was widely believed to have been partially financed by the Empire of Japan which would explain Vietnam’s and Kampuchea’s alliance with Japan following independence. Laos on the other hand aligned itself with the Republic of China to the north to counter growing Vietnamese and Khmer influence. Many Conservatives in Britain lambasted the Liberals disengagement in Indochina with opposition leader Sir Ryan Baxter decrying it as “a mistake of epic proportions” and a “betrayal to the Empire”.


attachment.php

Flag of the Empire of Vietnam


attachment.php

Flag of the Kingdom of Laos

attachment.php

Flag of the State of Kampuchea


 
Last edited:
In addition, I believe that one area of tech development that would be considerably behind OTL's level of progress is military/weapons technology. True, we have nuclear weapons in the 20th century, as well as being considerably more advanced in rocketry (we managed to reach Mars by 2011, after all ;)), but without a Second World War or any more major conflicts during the century* I can see these items in particular not even existing (or if so, at a highly atavic state):

1-A) Aircraft carriers; something tells me that without any experimentation into naval aviation in general (which ISTR was absent ITTL's Great War), there won't be any replacing the battleship as queen of the seas,

1-B) Aircraft in general; for all we know, the aircraft used in the Great War aren't any more advanced than what existed IOTL (to wit, overpowered gliders from which one could do arty spotting, or drop hand bombs/fire small arms from). This IMHO would likely preclude any development in jet fighters or helicopters/autogyros/etc., and certainly no strategic bombers (no trench stalemate to break by bombing major cities, remember?), unless said development happened "off-screen" as it were,

2) Guided missiles; while rocketry development has gone ahead, there remains the issue of guiding said rockets anywhere meaningful (air-to-air, air-to-ground, ground-to-air, etc.), like you said WRT radar,

3) Automatic weapons; actually, there could be a somewhat high level of development here if the French go ahead with some of their projects at an earlier stage, and the Coalition decides to ape them in order to stay ahead. This is far from certain though,

4) Tanks; yes, the "battle-cats" get a mention around Operation Titanic towards the end of the war. That still doesn't mean they necessarily evolve past being moving metal walls for the infantry to follow, let alone acting as MBTs in the way we understand them, and finally

5) Satellites; we can surmise from the level of progress in space travel that we can park items in orbit fairly easily (the Germans managed it with the Frieden), but we don't know whether or not electronics managed to miniaturize to the necessary point to allow satellite communications. This potentially means no GPS, no Dish Network-type TV, no long-range tactical communications, and no cell phones.

Not trying to burst anybody's bubble or be a stick in the mud, just a reminder that, without an ersatz line of development in either war or peace-time, much of technology as we know it might be absent. This is especially true on the battlefield.

*EDIT: Yes, I know there were two other major wars in the 20th., namely the Chinese Civil War and the Indian Independence War. However, can we really expect there to be any innovation borne from those conflicts? They're civil actions both, and likely fought as much with thrown stones and car bombs as anything high-tech. IDK, maybe I'm missing something there, just a gut feeling.

Interesting points.

1 A) Indeed, Battleships are still Kings of the Sea, but we will be seeing some aircraft carriers in action soon.

1 B) Naturally because this is AH, Airships are more widespread than OTL. Aircraft development is only a little behind OTL in terms of fighters. And yes, bomber development is far behind OTL.

2) Guided missile tech is behind OTL.

3) What projects did the French have with automatic weapons?

4) Cataphracts or Cats for sort will be featured in the next couple of updates. Currently the U.S. Army has not had much use for them.

5) Satellites will be coming in future. I don't see any reason why other tech like GPS, Dish Network-type TV, long-range tactical communications, and cell phones would be behind OTL. In fact some of these will appear sooner than they did in OTL.
 
Top