It's the Kaiserreich under Emperor Louis-Ferdinand, the republican right of Germany is in disgrace and the left cannot be trusted, so the DNVP enters power and restores the Monarchy, there will never be a Federal Republic of Germany. It's still about half of Germany though; you'll see its shape eventually. Leaning towards Westphalia and Bavaria being the core part of Imperial western Germany now.If East Germany is up to the Weser, the FRG is just a little sliver of a thing.
Well, the Battle of Wizna had roughly the same level of numbers, so it's possible.If possible, I'd also like to hear more about the 33rd Chilean Battalion holding off an entire Corps of green guard soldiers. I mean, a normal corps of soldiers is around 50000 men, whereas a battalion is like, maybe 1000 troops at best. That's a 50:1 manpower ratio. How the hell does a battalion hold off a corps for that long?
Well, the Battle of Wizna had roughly the same level of numbers, so it's possible.
Good terrain, bad leadership for the Green Guard, their fondness for finding landmines via charging head on....
Never said they won. Just that they delayed 'em.Yeah, but the Poles lost that battle. Granted, they took out quite a few German soldiers, but they still lost badly.
I hate to bring up the massed infantry attack but it seems like that's the only way a single battalion could hold off an entire Corps of supported infantry.
Thunder of the South is a game kind of like a more serious and realistic approach to the concept shown in the OTL Nintendo series Battalion wars where you can give commands to your troops and hop around and personally command certain soldiers and their squads at a more intimate level. It also has things like morale and the like.Jello, excellent update. Red Star, that goes for you as well. I really want to play "Thunder of the South" now. Damn this universe and its superior video games!
The animated series sounds good as well, and the fact that American Marines are in it makes me (and my father) very happy men.
Germany already was scraping the bottle of the barrel at this point OTL too.
It's part of why the German collapse in 1944 was so extreme at both fronts.
Well they went into total war production much earlier and thanks to Ford and other American traitors and Franco-British investment their economy is much better geared for the realities of wars of production and their allies are generally stronger and more competent, with a more willing (and somewhat stronger) France on their side and a far more capable Italy being the big ones. Plus there's also a whole new theater to draw American production towards, though it's worth noting that in OTL World War 2, the USA never spent an entire year on a true total war footing. Similarly, Britain was rather weaker OTL, and the USSR's economy TTL is more modernized. The Allied induced collapse of Italy and liberation of France will be massive blows to the German war effort as it means Germany loses her two great power allies on the continent.And we've had an extra year of brutal warfare on the eastern front, as opposed to a month of fighting against Poland and France each plus a year of low casualty warfare against the British and two years of eastern front fighting.
Its arguably a miracle that the German war machine is actually functioning as well as it is and I wonder how long they can hold out.
teg
Well I mean they're not just bankrolling, but outright fighting in four theaters (Anti-German, Anti-Italian, Anti-Japanese, and Anti-brazilian) and if you include volunteers, they've got troops in a whole bunch of fronts; East Africa, China, Eastern Europe, Western Asia, Columbia, the Southern Cone, the Andes, the Pacific, the air war against Germany and Italy, and the battle of the Atlantic.One thing I've been thinking about is just how goddamn effective the Americans are in this TL. I mean, I know the Soviets are far better coordinated than they were in OTL, but it definitely seems like good old America is going to give the Nazis an even bigger battering than they did IRL. Which makes me realize that the Americans are going to be even more arrogant about their role in WW2 ITTL, with good reason.
One thing I've been thinking about is just how goddamn effective the Americans are in this TL. I mean, I know the Soviets are far better coordinated than they were in OTL, but it definitely seems like good old America is going to give the Nazis an even bigger battering than they did IRL. Which makes me realize that the Americans are going to be even more arrogant about their role in WW2 ITTL, with good reason.
Well I mean they're not just bankrolling, but outright fighting in four theaters (Anti-German, Anti-Italian, Anti-Japanese, and Anti-brazilian) and if you include volunteers, they've got troops in a whole bunch of fronts; East Africa, China, Eastern Europe, Western Asia, Columbia, the Southern Cone, the Andes, the Pacific, the air war against Germany and Italy, and the battle of the Atlantic.
America is the most powerful country on earth by far and they're going to make the fascist bloc very cognizant of that.
The VL-1 is like the IS-2.So, regarding the Vladamir Lenin Tanks utilized by the Comintern: How do they compare to the actual IS tank family? They sound like much better versions of them TBH.
I'll admit, I've heard some bad things about the IS tank, especially the IS-3, as it apparently has "poor gun depression".
But I'll admit besides the late Cold War era I'm not much of a treadhead.