The Churchill Crocodile would be extremely useful against Japanese bunkers during the Commonwealth and Imperial march through Thailand and into Indochina.
Last edited:
You mean Churchill Crocodile right?The Cromwell Crocodile would be extremely useful against Japanese bunkers during the Commonwealth and Imperial march through Thailand and into Indochina.
I don't think the Churchill was ever fitted, though the Matilda II, Crusader and Cromwell all were at some point.Was the Churchill III the first mark to have an AVRE version? I have not found a photo of that first AVRE version, or any of the later mid-war AVREs, with a dozer blade. Other useful capabilities, yes, but not a dozer blade in particular.
Not seen a picture with one , they do seem to be varying AVRE's but mainly its demolition or bridging on various types. Not sure there was a Cromwell bulldozer, are you mixing it up with the Centaur ones that did exist ( very similar looking it must be said and use of centaur hulls as funnies rather than more useful Cromwell's was common)?I don't think the Churchill was ever fitted, though the Matilda II, Crusader and Cromwell all were at some point.
This may have been due to the way the Churchill's tracks extended in front of the hull meaning the tank may have already been climbing an obstacle before the blade reaches it.Was the Churchill III the first mark to have an AVRE version? I have not found a photo of that first AVRE version, or any of the later mid-war AVREs, with a dozer blade. Other useful capabilities, yes, but not a dozer blade in particular.
Ah, yes, my bad. It was mention on the Cromwell wikipedia page, so I assumed they were talking about Cromwells.Not seen a picture with one , they do seem to be varying AVRE's but mainly its demolition or bridging on various types. Not sure there was a Cromwell bulldozer, are you mixing it up with the Centaur ones that did exist ( very similar looking it must be said and use of centaur hulls as funnies rather than more useful Cromwell's was common)?
If they need a combat dozer then a Matilda II (or I) conversion is most likely - Aussies did this later in the war https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/australia/matilda-dozerIn any case, our interest is is what capabilities might have existed in the Far East theater.
Noted and fixedYou mean Churchill Crocodile right?
Pretty sure that they had flamethrower Churchills at Dieppe in August 1942 ( not that they did much good ) so I think you are a bit out on first ones being wheeled.While there can be no doubt that the Crocodile version of the Churchill Tank would be extremely useful in the SEA region, it is even ITTL with the much better availability and designs of tanks. Too soon for such a weapon to have been developed, along with the rest of the technology required, it’s not just the tank, but also the trailer, high pressure delivery system, flame gun, and the fuel. Yes Hobart will have it on his list of specialist tanks to develop, but given the number of specialist vehicle’s development he has to oversee, such a vehicle will not be top of the list. I believe that his three main priorities will be an armoured engineer tank, remember Hobart was an engineering officer first, a bridging tank, and a mine clearance tank. The first armoured flamethrower is going to be wheeled closely followed by a carrier based version. . Only once experience has been gained from experimentation with these, will Hobart and his merry band develop TTL’s equivalent of OTL’s Churchill Crocodile.
RR.
Pretty sure that they had flamethrower Churchills at Dieppe in August 1942 ( not that they did much good ) so I think you are a bit out on first ones being wheeled.