Exactly! The next few chapters will touch on this, particularly concerning the Mali Federation and Maghreb Union.It is funny you mention the imperialist Pan-Arab habit of basically denying the people-hood of other indigenous groups in the region or in some instances claiming other languages are in fact little more then dialects of Arabic (with others accepting even embracing the Arabist imposition / cultural imperialism) whether it be towards the Amazigh, Christians who embrace identities like Lebanese Phoenicianism/etc and others by lumping them all under the umbrella term of Arab (even if it is considered more a continuum rather than a monolithic bloc), when that same argument if applied to other groups would receive a rather cool reception at best were one to boldly claim for example English-speaking Celtic groups like the Irish/Scots/Welsh/etc are in fact English (with others likely having similar sentiment / historical grievances towards the Arabs as the Irish/etc does towards the English or a number of Black people have towards Whites).
Would be refreshing to see historical Arab to Pan-Arab imperialism be held to account instead of the Arab World successfully painting themselves as one if not the main victims of colonialism/imperialism in OTL, yet can understand why a number of Christians and others in MENA embraced Pan-Arabism and became prominent figures in OTL (since the only other commonality in the region would then be based on religion/etc which puts them and others in a vulnerable position).
Overall it seems the Anti-Arab Pan-Africanist Alliance would be one useful component (together with an ATL India under Sardar Patel followed by Rajaji) for a more independent and Right-leaning Anti-Communist equivalent of the Non-Aligned Movement (that is its own distant thing in ATL).
The Anti-Arab Pan-Africanist Alliance will form a bloc on its own with the sooner establishment of the African Union ITTL and maintain a neutral position on the West-East dispute.