So how long can the Belgians and the French hold onto the Rhineland and the Ruhr? With Germans fleeing the region, the British are probably already having nightmares of seeing everything up to the Rhine becoming French, something just as bad as the Flanders coastline becoming German.
I doubt the migration will get anywhere near the point where the Rhineland ceases to have a majority German population, but Silesia is a lot farther from Britain, so any industry that moves there is going to be less vulnerable to bombing raids. I assumed that was going to be the long-term significance of the migration.
Yes, you are correct here.I doubt the migration will get anywhere near the point where the Rhineland ceases to have a majority German population, but Silesia is a lot farther from Britain, so any industry that moves there is going to be less vulnerable to bombing raids. I assumed that was going to be the long-term significance of the migration.
The Weimar government will receive plenty of hate from Germans in the next couple years.Hitler and the NSDAP could pressure the German government to stop paying reparations to France and Belgium.
Because "as occupiers, they committed war crimes in their occupation zones, which is a break of the peace treaty. Therefore, Germany is free from her own obligations".
It's an obvious pretext but it IS a pretext.
After Silesia, they will try and hold on as long as they can. They're trying to squeeze out as much reparation payments as they can, but it's not working.So how long can the Belgians and the French hold onto the Rhineland and the Ruhr? With Germans fleeing the region, the British are probably already having nightmares of seeing everything up to the Rhine becoming French, something just as bad as the Flanders coastline becoming German.
No collapse (at least not yet), but definitely an assload of debt.Will we actually see a French collapse thanks to going Insolvent trying to hold Germany down? OTL they had problems by 1935 how much worse will it be itl?
Im interested at the future Borders Hitler wants with French and the Belgians the have not made themself friends inside of germany.
ITTL he was a Feldwebel by war's end.Wow, I can see why people see Hitler as admirable TTL. He really put his money where his mouth is, and seems actually competent in military matters
Despite how monstrously evil Hitler was, he had a decent grasp of strategy, likely from his experience as a soldier in WWI. Some of his decisions helped benefit the Wehrmacht's performance in WWII. In the invasion of Russia he had correct strategic thinking in focusing the invasion towards Southern Russia near the Caucasus where its oil fields and refineries were. This was the closest and largest source of oil available to the Axis. Of course Halder changed the invasion plan focusing towards Moscow in imitation of the French Campaign. By the time German high command found out it was too late. Germany was critically low on fuel and had to partially demechanize its infantry as early as the invasion of France with various equipment being towed by horses. One of his main motivations for invading Russia was to gain access to its oil as the war had seen Germany cut off from the large imports from the US and the Persian Gulf. And synthetic oil and Romanian oil production was insufficient to meet the demands of the German War machine. Of course people like Halder tried to save their reputation by whitewashing themselves of all responsibility in terms of their leadership and command.Wow, I can see why people see Hitler as admirable TTL. He really put his money where his mouth is, and seems actually competent in military matters
Yes, to a certain degree. The SA have already fought in Silesia and now they are in the middle of a underground war against the French and Belgian occupation forces.Is the SA more disciplined in this?Could Hitler have attracted more former officers of the imperial army into his militia and atleast have a mildly disciplined army seen in a better light then otl's thug like SA?