Keenir
Banned
MerryPrankster said:They're interesting and they got screwed over by history.
that's part of why I'm giving the Sicarii another chance.
(that is, because hte Sicarii were likewise dumped by history)
MerryPrankster said:They're interesting and they got screwed over by history.
Condottiero said:Part 2
MerryPrankster said:Two things...
1. Where do the Ottomans come from,
Cloudy Vortex said:Ignoring dynastic legends, the Ottomans were a ch. 13 reorganization and renaming of the Anatolian Seljuks. Everything I've seen shows the Ottomans and Seljuks being one and the same. They named themselves after a great leader with a new vision, same as the "first" Seljuks. First they were Oghuz, then Seljuk, then Osmanli, now Turk.
Shadow Knight said:What's with the thread necromancy?
Keenir said:??
necromancy? nae.
I was just reading hte thread, and wished to make constructive comments.
Thande said:There's nothing wrong with thread necromancy, in moderation, and it can often lead to a regeneration of old forgotten timelines.
Having said that, Keenir, you should be advised that Molobo was banned months ago, and thus cannot reply to the points you raised.
Shadow Knight said:No problem, its just that the last post before yours was July of 2005. Usually when a thread goes this long without a post it is determined to be dead.
Shadow Knight said:However constructive comments are always welcome.
Keenir said:Genghis Khaan invaded the Chinas....it wasn't until Hugelu(sp) that a Mongol leader "went native".
Condottiero said:I thought this was dead, but if any of you is interested and have fresh ideas about how to continue it... I could retake it.