I'm not normally much of a one for these big Cold War military stories, but you really manage to make it flow superbly. Fascinating to read about a time when the IDF was worth a damn.
Thanks! It's a bit of a departure from the general run of
McGoverning to do what is so explicitly a war story, but also a place where Trends very much come into play. There are also complex but distinctive differences here: on one hand the Israelis actually get a much firmer
substantive US security guarantee out if it than they ever have IOTL, from the McGovern administration no less. But the primary-source record from OTL points to McGovern's (naive? possibly. Foursquare and determined? as always) respect for Israel and his position as a Democrat of his era clinging to any electoral mandate he can claim by his fingernails whereby he cannot afford to lose the votes of Jewish Americans tied historically to the party. But in the Butterfly Field of events Israel gets roughed up a bit more: even heavier casualties, a rougher time on the Syrian front especially, lower reserves of fuel and materiel (IAF excepted) by the end of the fighting, and they haven't really
crossed the Canal as they did IOTL, they've just cut off the two main Egyptian field armies on the eastern bank.
You've also hit on an important point, not just about quality in the sense of skill and measurable outcomes. This (together with OTL's Entebbe raid a few years later) were perhaps the last times the IDF took on the role that helped define its own, and the State of Israel's, position in the hearts and minds of many Americans during the first decades of the state. This was the last hurrah for the dashing, young, surprisingly-leftist children of hope, the generation who had grown up to spite the
Sho'ah and fight for their lives against the weight of numbers in a hostile world. The seeds of future problems had grown already by that point, even in the very character of the state itself - in longtime correspondent Patrick Tyler's excellent phrase that it was "Sparta masquerading as Athens" - but '73 was an existential struggle and one in which Israelis could make the case that they were actually fighting for the very survival of their whole enterprise
in survival. There were great stakes among some of the other parties too: the Assad regime was in some measure fighting for the survival of a coherent Syrian state through a central, nationalist project aimed at the collective enemy, Israel. Likewise, in an irony that is either Orwellian or downright Zen, Anwar Sadat was fighting for a future with some measure of peace and stability in it, by staking the claim to Sinai and to a restoration of Egyptian pride and national sense of self that would give him the leverage to stabilize borders and relations. Awful lot of marbles being played for.
Then, too, there are the stakes of various other players, the US included, where we're just starting to see how things might play out, and that leads me to your YouTube clip:
Nice. I get exposed to more quality tunes around here as people find apt musical quotations for the moment.