Cohort Democracy

Cohort Democracy​

While cohort democracy could be used as a complete form of government, it would normally be intended to be a piece in a larger government e.g., representative republic, parliamentary monarchy, etc.

Cohort democracy is built of the idea of voting cohorts. These are a group of around 3-12ish people (they don't need to be all the same size, but too many more or less defeats the purpose of having them). Each cohort is given the number of votes equal to the number of people in the cohort, however the cohort votes as group meaning all the votes must be the same. Individual voting is not allowed, a person must be part of a cohort to cast their vote. Cohorts need to be registered & a person cannot be part of more than one cohort at the same time.

There are two basic ideas that cohort democracy attempts to address.
  • The first, is to "force" deliberation before voting. Since all votes must be the same before being cast, the cohort would have to deliberate their options before casting it.
  • The second, is to ensure that the "collective good" isn't lost to personal interests, since the decision is support to happen as a group.

"Voting abuse" would be a concern, & regulations should be in place to prevent "bullying".

Right off I can see three different flavors in addition to the generic version:

Family Cohort Democracy​

The default cohorts are families, extended families. Obviously, new cohorts would have to be able to be formed, but unless an individual registers otherwise, they would be included in their family's cohort by default. Children, may or may not be included in the number of votes the cohort receives.​
(Great for distributist countries)​

Syndicalist Cohort Democracy​

Cohorts are formed out of the individuals' jobs. I cohort may be everyone within a particular factory, or even department of that factory depending on it's size.​

Geographic Cohort Democracy​

Cohorts are formed out of location, such as a single street or a city block.​
 
a bunch of ridiculous futuristic ideologies straight from the worldjerking subreddit
a bunch of ridiculous futuristic ideologies straight from the worldjerking subreddit
Neo-pastoralism with antibiotic characteristics- Deliberate efforts to live outwardly low-tech lives for improved quality of life in a primarily pastoralist (herd-raising) context (though doesn't exclude farming). Everyone knows their place in the structure but also little room for advancement or growth. I allow that certain technologies (such as medicine) are maintained.

19A0s vapor-futurist corporatism- Think cyberpunk but without the cybernetics; a retrogression to pre-End-of-History capitalist status quo. Corporations rule, like the Korean chaebol, but with an aesthetic similar to 70s or 80s futurist ideas; muscle cars and neon lights with fragments of former pop culture chopped and screwed into new shapes (the 'vaporwave' aesthetic). The 19A0s are a tongue-in-cheek conspiracy theory that says there was a lost decade between the late 70s and early 80s that 'explains' massive changes in pop culture, music and society around this time, but that it's been removed from our memories. This would be an attempt to recreate that Lost Decade.

Voluntarist post-agrarianism- A voluntary regression to hunter-gatherer norms; attempting to live in homeostasis with nature, possibly only possible after a collapse removes Westphalian nation states. Voluntaryism is a form of libertarianism but here is used to imply a degree of free association that allows like-minded individuals to re-form villages and tribes; those who no longer wish to live with their tribe, or those tribe no longer wants them, move on and start their own village.

Neo-nomadic modular post-urbanism - The decline of home ownership and the need for personal mobility in the face of mass migration evolves into a new nomadism; everyone owns no more than they can fit into their vehicle, or lives in mobile communes. These vehicle share a common tool set so can be taken apart and reassembled to meet changing needs throughout your lives. You might call this 'Sensible Max'.

Post-scarcity neo-Victorian perma-academia- Once it's no longer necessary to struggle to secure the means of life, and with human healthspans extended almost indefinitely, how will humans occupy their time? One possibility is that the world devolves into a massive orgy of sex and drugs. After some time, however, it's possible that the reverse happens and, with nothing to gain or prove, the world settles down into something a lot more sedate and possibly even moralistic; the model that is settled upon here is that of the university; students live and work in halls of residence, studying the accumulated knowledge of the world during the day and helping with such tasks as are necessary to maintain the university and grounds.

Art Deco trans-centrist secular messianism.-
'Trains centrism' is a tongue-in-cheek concept I developed on Twitter, using the apparent phenomenon of the 'trains horseshoe' (where the more extreme one becomes politically the more one tends to like trains specifically as a method of public transport) to posit that the political spectrum is actually a sphere, with a 'trains centrism' on the antipode to regular centrism. It also means, with a more sinister edge, those centrists who 'don't care how we get to a functioning society, as long as the trains run on time'. This world would see a mixed-economy model promoted and enforced almost religiously by a body or ideology (think a Rand or Hubbard) whose goal is the defeat of death and the natural world; a 'secular messianism' that holds that man can overcome absolutely. Such a world would promote economic freedom (within limits) but not necessarily social freedom; the Project's ideology would be supreme and speaking out against it tantamount to terrorism.

Fully automated luxury ruralism (on closer inspection this image is probably intended to be post-apocalyptic as the robot is overgrown with vines, but I will assume that this is camouflage to allow it to blend into the rural scene)- The growth of automation makes it possible to live lives of ease and comfort, with most people choosing to live in small, tight-knit communities, far outside the former cities, which have been left to decay. Robot labour, carefully concealed and camouflaged, does the heavy lifting, with humans joining in only to the extent that it's enjoyable.

Interplanetary colonial homeostasis- Your typical 'expand throughout the universe' story, but with one important difference; no terraforming is allowed and efforts are made to live in as close to a 'natural' way on each world as possible.

Post-mortality gamer technarchy- With death defeated, the physical world itself seems grey and uninteresting, when endless lives in fantasy realms are possible. Unlike some predictions people choose not to 'jack in', but instead live real-world lives in small, comfortable apartments, maintained by robots who bring food, clothing and other comforts, with the vast majority of their human interaction being in virtual worlds. With neural networks taking oversight of distribution and maintenance firmly out of human hands, the rulers of this new world are the designers and top players of the virtual worlds humans choose to inhabit; not a technocracy (rule by the skilled) but technarchy (rule by technarchs, the masters of technology).

Benevolent Gothic-styled cyber-thearchy- Not a theocracy (rule by priests) but thearchy (rule by a god). AI has developed to the point where it is self-aware and impossibly intelligent, but still deeply concerned with human well-being and the task of optimising human happiness. To enforce its authority, the AI (or AIs, if there are multiple competing forces) present themselves much as the gods of previous eras (who can after all, be seen as AIs on a human substrate), adopting the aesthetics of a more detail-orientated time. Efficiency with redundancy is the hallmark of its regime - tools are built to last so as not to waste resources, but there is no single lynchpin (the AI's own cores, displayed to pilgrims in cavernous cathedrals, are backed up thousands of times)

Cybernetic neo-predator mind transfer- As understanding of consciousness grows, it becomes possible for humans to desert humanity altogether, and many choose to live in simpler forms - wolf-like creatures running impossibly fast through the night, chasing down prey and revelling in their machine-aided supremacy over any natural creature.

K-selective techno-Darwinistic v-Exitism- The IQ required to destroy the world gets one point closer to the norm every decade. At some point, a super-villain - a 'Dr Gno', if you will - will acquire the ability to end the world on his terms, preserving his own genes and possibly those of his family or ethnic group. But this doesn't end the story - instead, it begins a cascade of growth and destruction as natural variation produces geniuses who decide their best chance of survival rests in the elimination of all rivals. Ultimately, this v-Exitism - 'Exitism with Violence' will lead to a group of humanity leaving Earth, rendering it uninhabitable in the process to ensure that no-one can follow them. Will the pattern repeat among the stars?

Dyson Sphere aestivation- One explanation for the apparent lack of alien life in the cosmos is that they are all sleeping while the suns are literally shining, storing the energy of their star for use in a period where the universe is at a far lower energy level and the thermodynamic gradient between their stored energy and the environment is far greater. Ensconced within a Dyson Sphere, their civilisation would output virtually no electromagnetic signal. While 'sleeping', it would be possible for the species to inhabit a shared dream - a looping simulation (or recorso) on a superconducting substrate consumes no energy, providing every loop leads back to the starting state. What sort of simulation would such beings choose to inhabit? Perhaps a simulation of their own culture, set in the distant past?

Interplanetary arcology monumentalism- The universe seems empty because it *is* empty. Earth is the only planet upon which intelligence ever has or will arise. Feeling the weight of this awesome responsibility, humankind embarks upon the ambitious project of becoming the Primogenitors of universal life, seeding millions of worlds with gene-engineered primordial life, containing the potential to evolve into broadly familiar forms. While humanity waits, it builds great structures across the universe - mind-boggling arcologies, megastructures around stars, servicing the human civilisation but also preparing for the day when our children will launch a rocket into the heavens and land upon their moon, only to find plaques and empty structures of unknown purpose, all bearing a script strange to them.

Panspermia Genesis Re-enactment Society- How best to spread the human race throughout the stars? One possibility is this: we terraform a world into an idyllic paradise, in which man can survive without any artificial aid. Then we take a genetically engineered man and woman, designed to contain enough variation to sustain a human population, grown to adulthood in a laboratory, and place them down on this world, and hovering above them in our transfigured bodies, command them 'Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it'. And if they discover, as we did, that all is not as it seems, and that we are no gods, they will have earned their place among the stars, as we did. And perhaps they will change a world after the pattern of their own, and taking a man and a woman, place them down, saying 'Be fruitful, and multiply...'.

Post-Clarkian Singularity Thaumatarchy- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic, even to its users. We no longer know how the technology works, or how it develops itself, but we manipulate it with commands in the archaic languages it was written, and step from world to world on staircases of shining substance. The rulers of this world are the thaumuturges - the wonder-makers who speak to the great intelligences that reside in the plenum and command the forces of the Irreal.
 
Is there a philosophical ideology based around
  • Epistomology - how people know about the world
  • Ontology - the nature of being
 
Erosocracy
Erosocracy. Think of it like Theocracy but for Romantic love. The purpose of the state is to be guided by and promote the growth of ideal Romantic relationships between people in a relationship, where each fulfils the role of the magical other to the other, the purpose of life to the other in the relationship. Of course, in theory this could be applied a million different ways, but how it manifested in the Erotic republic of France was basically and education system to make everyone into the ideal partner, starting first with the general preferences and as we specialize in our fields of study and careers, we also specialize in what Romantic archetype to embody as one matures through the educational system until at tertiary levels we have very specific archetypes one could even call them fetishes.

Aside from the clear growth of the ideology from a time of idealizing Romance, it also argued for other practical benefits. People could fulfil each other better than any religion or ideology and we all know that a mentally and morally healthy population is of better quality as individuals and as an emergent group than anything that a religion or ideology could manage, that it would lower corruption by allowing us to focus our drive away from money and power (tho, "power mongers" as the Erosocracy called their evolutionary psychology bent critics claim that much corruption is already caused by valuing interpersonal relationships and the human drive for power, over the community so this risks to form predatory power couples) and redirect it towards Romantic love, increase life spans, reduce stress and so many other personal, social and political benefits.
 
Last edited:
Powerism
Powerism :- A philosophy that posits that humans have a drive for freedom, autonomy and most importantly, power that must be satisfied, infact, the government should be as obligated to satisfy it as they are to satisfy hunger, even more so given solving the former problem is a problem that they have come far closer to succeeding in that the power, freedom and autonomy problem. It was the coalescing of several controversial theorists and social movements usually divided up like this; Women are into powerful men(Red pill, Evolutionary Psychology); Men, especially extra-ordinary have a compulsion, a will to gain power that if not fulfilled leads to psychological damage(Nietzche, Arthur Schopenhauer); and Humans in general have a biological compulsion as serious as any other to experience a power process, a process of expressing their power and agency on the environment(Ted Kaczynski, Desmond John Morris, Zoology).

As such it posited that we don't just want P,F&A directly but also indirectly, with women being easier to satiate with indirect P,F&A than men are so the goal isn't just to let people attain P,F&A but to reduce the relational distance between them and P,F&A. However, this must be done without veering into "masturbation" or a "voyeurism" of P,F&A and example of this would be fan support for a sports team or celebrity, while that might solve P,F&A as a state issue, it does so short sightedly by creating tribalism and doesn't solve it personally so that people would still suffer from a lack of P,F&A and take their daily jerk offf to P,F&A to escape that concern.
 
Is there a philosophical ideology based around
  • Epistomology - how people know about the world
  • Ontology - the nature of being
Well, any form of thought/study/analysis has ontological and epistemological assumptions behind it. For example, science works under the assumption that the universe behaves in a consistent manner as otherwise, making predictions would be meaningless. Ontology and epistemology are so fundamental that you cannot really think without them, and this is irrespective of whether or not you choose to explicitly lay out your ontology and epistemology. Hence political ideologies(I do not like using this term) such as Marxism or Classical Liberalism have ontological and epistemological assumptions behind them, and these assumptions have a key role in how apply them to thought, analysis and praxis ie. the doing of politics.
 
SPAGYRIC
Can't believe I forgot to crosspost this one I made awhile ago 😂 I was going to dust it off and modify it for a Fullmetal Alchemist crossover idea so have a look at Spagyricism, a heterodox ideology based on democratic peasant populism and alchemical theory!

Green_lion_consuming_the_sun.jpg


SPAGYRIC
"As above, so below"

A product of the tumultuous period that birthed the German Renaissance and the Protestant Reformation, spagyric, also occasionally known as "the German Ideology" or "the doctor's disease", arose from the cross-pollination of ideas common in the German lands brought about by the rapid adoption of the printing press in the 16th century. Rooted in the life and work of noted alchemist, theologian and philosopher Theophrastus von Hohenheim, who lived from 1493 to 1541, following his death his methodology would be adopted by the Paracelsian school of medical thought, which continued his focus on direct experience over received wisdom and his firm belief in the necessity of balance between the microcosm and the macrocosm.

This intellectual tradition would over time acquire its political focus as the aftermath of the German Peasant's War continued to ripple though the century. Although the conflict had still been a rout for the Peasant's Army, a better showing than OTL (and more survivors) had seen the democratic ethos and anti-Magisterial tenor of the movement spread throughout Germany even in the face of repression from secular and religious authorities. The spagyric movement would spend roughly a century refining its doctrine and theories of government, forming the nucleus of the Continental Age of Enlightenment in the wake of the midcentury German Revolutions.

Ideology- Spagyric revolves around a political interpretation of several alchemical metaphors championed by Paracelsus himself.
  • "As above, so below"- The exact definition of the central macrocosm-microcosm balance has shifted as the ideology has become more overtly political and the science of astronomy has advanced, with a focus on balancing the people and the government inherited from the democratic ethos of the Revolt. Democratic local power therefore demands democratic central power, with a focus on consensus and evidence-based decision making over hereditary privilege or hierarchical leadership. The focus on balance also favors a class-collaborationist approach at home and a pursuit of harmonious relations abroad. Unless provoked or attacked, in which case "restoring balance" can excuse a wide variety of extremely radical or interventionist policies.
  • The Three Principles: As Paracelsus taught that all things were made up of a balance between energetic Sulfur, fluid Mercury and stable Salt, spagyric governments seek a balance between these three forces in the body politic through specially delineated tripartite legislative bodies, with the sulphuric chamber drawn by lot and capable of proposing and debating legislation, the saline chamber made up of appointed censors to examine and challenge unjust or ill-defined laws, and the mercurial chamber to balance the two, elected by the population to amend and pass legislation and constitute the executive organs of the state.
  • The Hermetic Spectrum: Spagyric does not rationalize itself along a spiritual good/evil binary or a more familiar progressive/conservative political one, but rather between balance and imbalance, the hermetic-dynamic axis. In the spagyric context, the hermetic position is one which maintains equilibrium between all levels and sectors of society, whatever that means in a particular context, while dynamic positions seek to disproportionately shift the social system in favor of one group or other, or to strike first in an international conflict. The hermetic position is not merely classically conservative however, actively intervening as scientific knowledge, technological capabilities and material relations between social groups change to best balance the social equation.
Methodology- Befitting a movement founded on empirical study and democratic principles, spagyric takes great pride in a robust and widely accessible education system, viewing an educated population as best able to achieve a harmonious social order. The focus on direct experience is especially pronounced in the sciences, where an emphasis on testing and experimentation has made spagyric polities the center of major advancements in chemistry, medicine, astronomy and engineering over the centuries. The focus on social-personal interpretation of the macrocosm-microcosm balance has unfortunately made the spagyric movement one with an extremely invasive public health regime, with Paracelsus's own focus on diet and good health having gradually morphed into a culture where large societal-scale chemical, dietary and behavioral experiments are an accepted part of life. Thankfully unlike many examples from OTL these experiments are not used in a classist or racist way, but out of a genuine desire to continually improve the standard of living for all citizens.

Symbology- While the three legislative chambers tend to utilize their relevant alchemical symbol, the broader movement as a whole is typically represented by a green lion devouring the sun, a symbol likewise derived from alchemy to represent perfection or completion.
d8a5660c4bcf8b4eedfe345628cf3fb5.jpg

-The symbols of the Three Principles, Sulfur, Mercury and Salt, which form the basis of the spagyric political system.


View attachment 718691

- The flag of the Spagyric Roman Republic (Spagyrische Römischen Republik) combines several traditional German colors in a new design influenced by alchemical symbolism and the circumstances of the nation's founding in the wake of the Thirty Years War and the German Revolutions. The vertical segment features an inversion of the black on gold of the HRE Imperial Banner and depicts a green lion devouring the sun as a symbol of spagyric and the aspiration toward an ideal society. Taken with the stripes the black also represents "nigredo", the first stage of the Magnum Opus representing decomposition. From the bottom, the white ("albedo", purification), yellow ("citrinitas", enlightenment) and red ("rubedo", completion) stripes represent the successive stages of this process.

Time got away from me and I have to be at the airport in an hour so I'll just lay out my notes on the German Revolutions rather than doing a paragraph style update 😅 As mentioned before a more lenient end to the Peasant's War has led to a century of spreading radicalism among the peasant class even as the German intellectual scene has come increasingly under the influence of spagyric thought. In universe whether you refer to the conflict as the Thirty Years War or the German Revolutions is seen as a pretty good indicator of the sides you believe were in the right.

Phase I: 1618-1635
  • The causes of the war are broadly similar, with a conflict between Catholic Ferdinand and Protestant Frederick over the crown of Bohemia (and with it Ferdinand's election as Holy Roman Emperor) spinning into a broader conflict within the empire over sectarian lines.
  • Because of dynastic ties this brings in the Spanish on the side of Austria, the first in a string of foreign nations to offer support for one side or the other. Most prominently in the first phase Sweden supported Frederick, while Britain briefly harried the Spanish before negotiating a peace and the Dutch revolted against the Spanish.
  • During this early period, broad discontent with the political and religious causes of the war (helped along by the ravenous mercenaries used liberally by the belligerents) gradually becomes a more potent force among the populace as the war drags on, leading to a growing undercurrent of populist anger in the vein of the Peasant's revolt.
  • The spagyric movement also spreads among the armies due to the sheer volume of spagyric practitioners acting as battlefield doctors, inspired by Paracelsus's own time as a field surgeon during the Venetian Wars.
  • Although France was also Catholic Spanish involvement on the side of the Austrians brings them in on the side of the Protestant states in the conflict, ratcheting up the tension and kicking off the second phase.
Phase II: 1635-1648
  • This new phase of the war sets off a perfect storm of factors, with the example of the ongoing Dutch War of Independence and the growing populist backlash against the aristocracy sparking off a wave of mutinies, desertions and populist revolts throughout the Holy Roman Empire.
  • At first disorganized, the survivors of the Peasant's War had gained hard won experience about the importance of organization, leading to a century-old tradition of militias operating quietly without official sanction. This tendency serves them well in the conflict, with preexisting militias gaining valuable field experience defending themselves against mercenaries. By the time this second phase begins this has also exposed them to spagyric ideas, creating the synthesis that forms the core of the movement.
  • Far better organized than their ancestors and opposed largely by hired mercenaries or exhausted soldiers of one side or the other the conflict decidedly turns against both Austria and France, with the former having been forced to rely on Spanish manpower in the first place and the latter distracted both by war with Spain and a homegrown Protestant insurrection.
  • What follows is largely a period of consolidation as new revolutionary governments are proclaimed and the new German identity solidifies, with the Spagyric Roman Republic declared in 1648. In an ironic twist the Spanish Habsburgs actually come out in far better shape than the Austrian branch, with the latter losing a chunk of their Germanic heartland in the bargain.
The new government has a blend of democratic and antidemocratic features, with the Sulphuric Chamber drawn by lot from a pool of all adult men, the Mercurial Chamber elected proportionally by the many (many many...) states and free cities that make up the Republic and the Saline Chamber in turn appointed by the Mercurial one.

Later Speaker of the Mercurial Chamber Johann Joachim Becher, when speaking of the Revolutions, would come to define what he called "the phlogiston theory of revolution", in which phlogistic societies have the inherent potential for revolution and calxified ones do not, either through a lack of necessary conditions or through the successful completion of a revolution. Although his original phlogiston scientific theory has since been discredited the metaphor has stuck.

Political factions are fairly loosely defined in this early period, though largely defined along confessional lines at this stage. By far the dominant two are the Undines (secular spagyrics) and Sylphs (Anabaptists and radical reformers), with both in agreement on such issues as the primacy of local control, the necessity of keeping politics out of the business of religion, religious toleration and a peaceful foreign and domestic policy. They are, naturally opposed by the Salamanders (Magisterial Protestants) and Gnomes (Catholics). All four contain hermetic and dynamic wings, with some dynamic Undines even floating a civil religion/Cult of Reason focused around a metaphoric interpretation of Hermes Trismegistus. It doesn't go anywhere at the time but it may or may not come back in a big way...
 
Several ideologies
Ok so, idk if these two ideas I have, have been done already, or if their kind of flat, but I still think I'd share them:

Post-Nuclear Free-Market Anarchism: Essentially, this one is kind of like Posadism, except that instead of Communism being the Post-Nuclear ideology, it's essentially anarcho-capitalism. Essentially, the state creates nuclear weapons and, states eventually nuke each other, and thus, after the nuclear war, the survivors shall realize the folly of the state and embrace anarchism and free markets to prevent the rise of another tyrannical regulating state which shall lead to the same outcome of the previous ones (nuclear war).

Monarcho-Democracy (still thinking of a better title): The King/Queen shall have absolute power, but they shall use it to uphold democracy and liberty, if not for the Monarch, then tryanny would reign!
 
Monarcho-Democracy (still thinking of a better title): The King/Queen shall have absolute power, but they shall use it to uphold democracy and liberty, if not for the Monarch, then tryanny would reign!
So what keeping the monarchs promoting democracy?
If it's a constitution, then you could argue that's a constitutional monarchy.
If it is just the "goodwill" of the monarch that's sounds exactly like an enlightened monarchy.
 
So what keeping the monarchs promoting democracy?
If it's a constitution, then you could argue that's a constitutional monarchy.
If it is just the "goodwill" of the monarch that's sounds exactly like an enlightened monarchy.
I'll admit that was just a quick draft that I had in the shower, but, I'd be mix of both, I guess... Idk, I didn't think it through fully
 
Yeomanism
Yeomanism
"Tired of living in a city and having to buy groceries? With Yeomanism, you get to be a subsistence farmer, living off the land with your family. In fact, you don't just get to be, you have to be! Ready to undo centuries of urbanization overnight? Great! Pick up a hand scythe and skim some Wikipedia pages on crop rotation, cause we're about to go repopulate Old Sarum."

Ok, I'll go out of character now...

Economically, it's a sort of libertarian market socialism, although the market is maybe somewhere in between a gift economy and what we would think of as a market. There is personal property but no private ownership of production. Culturally, it varies a little from village to village, but in general it's a mix of enlightenment-liberal-style "individual rights" and stuffy "father knows best". They pride themselves on having a "strong, healthy rule of law" but so do most ideologies so that doesn't mean much. There is basically no inequality of wealth but there are other forms of inequality: You'll get a noticeably lighter sentence for your crimes if you're well connected to the omnipresent Good Ol' Boy Network. The federal government had been reduced to a tiny, humble, committee of bureaucrats, chosen by vote or lottery, with short term limits. Public opinion is divided over ecosystem management, the existence of an internet, censorship vs protected speech, absentee voting, and whether fiddle music is better than flute music. However, everyone who's not a social outcast agrees that cities are literally Satan.
 
Last edited:
In his book The Dawn of Everything, David Graeber postulates that the development of the state as we know it went hand in hand with the loss of three kinds of freedom: the freedom to escape one's surroundings and move away, the freedom to disobey arbitrary authority, and the freedom to reimagine and reconstruct one's society in a different form. Would it be possible to concoct an alternate ideology that made the preservation of these rights a priority, while also allowing for modern infrastructure and technology?

I thought about a system in which individual polities (ideally, only as big as a municipality) are governed by compromise and consensus, with the remaining dissenting voices being allowed to vote with their feet instead, heading for a polity more aligned with their own personal outlook - to maintain basic infrastructure and modern services, there would also be a central government staffed by delegates from those individual polities, again based on compromise and consensus, rather than majority votes and party politics.

Anyone has a better take on this concept?
 
In his book The Dawn of Everything, David Graeber postulates that the development of the state as we know it went hand in hand with the loss of three kinds of freedom: the freedom to escape one's surroundings and move away, the freedom to disobey arbitrary authority, and the freedom to reimagine and reconstruct one's society in a different form. Would it be possible to concoct an alternate ideology that made the preservation of these rights a priority, while also allowing for modern infrastructure and technology?

I thought about a system in which individual polities (ideally, only as big as a municipality) are governed by compromise and consensus, with the remaining dissenting voices being allowed to vote with their feet instead, heading for a polity more aligned with their own personal outlook - to maintain basic infrastructure and modern services, there would also be a central government staffed by delegates from those individual polities, again based on compromise and consensus, rather than majority votes and party politics.

Anyone has a better take on this concept?
Panarchy is probably what you’re looking for - a loose federal govt with individual members having Separate ideologies
 
Panarchy is probably what you’re looking for - a loose federal govt with individual members having Separate ideologies

Kind of, since in a panarchist system, rather than moving to a place that's more closely aligned to your views, you simply change your political membership, but it's close enough.
 
In his book The Dawn of Everything, David Graeber postulates that the development of the state as we know it went hand in hand with the loss of three kinds of freedom: the freedom to escape one's surroundings and move away, the freedom to disobey arbitrary authority, and the freedom to reimagine and reconstruct one's society in a different form. Would it be possible to concoct an alternate ideology that made the preservation of these rights a priority, while also allowing for modern infrastructure and technology?

I thought about a system in which individual polities (ideally, only as big as a municipality) are governed by compromise and consensus, with the remaining dissenting voices being allowed to vote with their feet instead, heading for a polity more aligned with their own personal outlook - to maintain basic infrastructure and modern services, there would also be a central government staffed by delegates from those individual polities, again based on compromise and consensus, rather than majority votes and party politics.

Anyone has a better take on this concept?


There are states that exist that control people more than controlling territory, maybe that kind of state can do it better.
 
There are states that exist that control people more than controlling territory, maybe that kind of state can do it better.

Graeber himself mentioned more than a few of them, but AFAIK there's no present-day state that's been able to do that while also having the kind of modern amenities for which it's basically indispensable to intervene on a territory on a permanent basis, by creating power plants, sewer systems and so on. Unless you counted those states, such as Indonesia, that have separate sets of laws for those belonging to different religions.
 
Erosocracy. Think of it like Theocracy but for Romantic love. The purpose of the state is to be guided by and promote the growth of ideal Romantic relationships between people in a relationship, where each fulfils the role of the magical other to the other, the purpose of life to the other in the relationship.
Oh, my! This could end very badly, but I suppose it's possible for it to be... not a disaster. The movie "The Lobster" shows a nasty version of a state somewhat like this, which obsesses over pairing people up with allegedly "compatible" people and making life miserable for single people.
 
Duginite Atlantis-Tartary Dichotomy
So, here's an idea. Basically, it's an expansion of the Duginite Atlantis-Tartary dichotomy to the world.

Atlantis: The rulers of the world. The Western European cultural sphere and its settler colonies in North America and Australasia. Modern global society is inevitably set up as Atlanto-centric.

Tartary: Those cultures that were subjugated to Atlantean interests, but retained a degree of independence and were able to function as second-rate powers (e.g. Russia, Japan, the Ottomans). Basically the 'Three Easts': Eastern Europe, East Asia, and the Middle East (and North Africa).

Lemuria: Cultures completely subjugated to Atlantis but not eradicated. South and Southeast Asia and Subsaharan Africa.

Mu: Cultures that Atlantis almost completely eradicated. The natives of the Americas and Oceania.

Note that Latin America is conspicuously absent, as I couldn't really fit it into any category. But this could be a bonus, seeing as Latin America (or El Dorado) incorporates cultural features from Atlantis, Lemuria, and Mu, and with a stretch Tartary as well (Brazil has the highest population of Japanese outside of Japan, for instance), making them foredestined to lead the world (or something like that).
 
Top