Yes it was, I meant to mention that but forgot.I had to double-check myself by looking it up: the Pulqui was a Kurt Tank design.
Yes it was, I meant to mention that but forgot.I had to double-check myself by looking it up: the Pulqui was a Kurt Tank design.
Very cool.Derailed TL Yak-23 Flora
View attachment 873969
OTL YAK-25 (1947) Alternate back story to com
Yak-25 Flashlight
View attachment 873968
Back story to come
Looks like a French Dassault Ouragan on steroids.OTL YAK-25 (1947) Alternate back story to com
Yak-25 Flashlight
View attachment 873968
Back story to come
Well these alt Heinkel jets are from an alternate timeline where Udet was not in charge of research and development and the Germans took a strong lead in jet aircraft development early in the war and win after a stalemate so the last plane I drew, (lets call it the Focke Wulf Fw. Ta. 223) is a post war design and the resources were available.It's probably the direction most would go, since it still follows classical German designs from OTL.
Now with either post war peace or (again remaining Weimar for my Weimarboo heart) remaining peace, would there be enough research in material and enough resources for the T-top tail of the Ta-183? I remember that the material in OTL were too advance to allow such a tail to work during the mid 40s.
Not in the same timeline as the He-202 one, right?Heinkel He-300
View attachment 874343
Heinkel's first post war jet fighter, entering service in 1947 the He-300 incorporated most of the lessons learned during the war.
Yes it is part of the same timeline, Heinkel wanted to make the most advanced and fastest fighter they could and use all the knowledge gained during the war, they borrowed from Messerschmitt, Focke Wulf and Blohm und Voss with the help of the Nazi hierarchy who forced the other companies to cooperate.Not in the same timeline as the He-202 one, right?
Seems more like that Heinkel tried to one up the Me-262.
Reminds me of the HG-III, would it have been build so that we have 2 very similar looking aircraft? Kinda like Mig and Sukhoi.
Again, questioning the plausibility of those tails during the mid to late 40s.
Wouldn't it be more aerodynamic to fuse the engines into the wings like in the HG III?Yes it is part of the same timeline, Heinkel wanted to make the most advanced and fastest fighter they could and use all the knowledge gained during the war, they borrowed from Messerschmitt, Focke Wulf and Blohm und Voss with the help of the Nazi hierarchy who forced the other companies to cooperate.
Theoretically, yes, but the major issue there would be figuring out how to route the main wing-spar around the jet engine and its intake path, while keeping the engines mostly external to the wing structure simplifies engineering and can potentially reduce structural weight (due to the wing not needing to have a spar that goes around the engine and intake duct, which is pretty much guaranteed to be at least somewhat longer and more complex in shape). And, of course, there's also maintenance advantages to not needing to completely open up the wing structure to get at the engine for repairs/replacement.Wouldn't it be more aerodynamic to fuse the engines into the wings like in the HG III?
You know, with being bigger than the He-202 from the looks of it and having 2 engines...Theoretically, yes, but the major issue there would be figuring out how to route the main wing-spar around the jet engine and its intake path, while keeping the engines mostly external to the wing structure simplifies engineering and can potentially reduce structural weight (due to the wing not needing to have a spar that goes around the engine and intake duct, which is pretty much guaranteed to be at least somewhat longer and more complex in shape). And, of course, there's also maintenance advantages to not needing to completely open up the wing structure to get at the engine for repairs/replacement.
The He-300 is a propaganda tool, the British the US and the Soviets are all putting new jet fighters into service and using ideas that originated in Germany during the war.You know, with being bigger than the He-202 from the looks of it and having 2 engines...
Would it be out of the window to propose to have the He-300 as an interceptor/bomber and the He-202 as a normal fighter?
I honestly hadn't thought too much about the advantages of mounting the engines to the fuselage but I did think it would make things simpler and that for once the Germans decided not to overcomplicate things.Theoretically, yes, but the major issue there would be figuring out how to route the main wing-spar around the jet engine and its intake path, while keeping the engines mostly external to the wing structure simplifies engineering and can potentially reduce structural weight (due to the wing not needing to have a spar that goes around the engine and intake duct, which is pretty much guaranteed to be at least somewhat longer and more complex in shape). And, of course, there's also maintenance advantages to not needing to completely open up the wing structure to get at the engine for repairs/replacement.
I can this a/c with floats!View attachment 874731
View attachment 874732
A pair of bi-plane Spitfires.
A request from this thread - https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/alternative-biplanes-for-ww2.548915/