Two-FistI need a name for this type of aircraft, any suggestions welcomed.
The magnificent twin fists of comrade Stalin. (Please don't send me to the gulag)Soviet version of engine wing tip plane.
I need a name for this type of aircraft, any suggestions welcomed.
View attachment 453848
Very cool looking plane. I did a bit of searching for jet-powered float-planes but I didn't come across this one. I did a couple of jet-float-planes for the https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/alternate-history-combat-aircraft.457446/ thread.View attachment 455266
By 1949 defence spending was at almost 17% of gross domestic product in the UK, fuelled by the Stanley Government’s rearmament drive.
The 12 jet fighters based on the the Thames represented for the first time since the last World War that the Royal Navy was part of the capital’s defences. Much to the RAFs chagrin, Saro Cyclone jet seaplanes of the Fleet Air Arm’s 901 Squadron supported the interceptors of Fighter Command and the guns and guided weapons of Air Defence Command.
The idea behind these is that they're suicide weapons intended for countering the Allied invasion of the home islands.
It was somewhat of a surprise therefore when it was announced that 1500 of the Luftwaffe’s newest interceptor; the Focke-Wulf Rabe, would be shared between the air arms of Czechoslovakia and Romania, instantly transforming them into amongst the most powerful in Europe.
1500?! Wow, Focke-Wulf acountants must be going "wwweeeee!!"...
Jane's All the Galaxy's Fighting Starships (2410 edition) #7
Name: U.S.S. White Plains (NCC-32266)
Type: Marine Assault Carrier
Class: Vindicator-class (3rd of 24, one further batch of 24 under construction, series production 'until requirements are met' authorised by Federation Council)
Nationality: Federation Starfleet (United Federation of Planets)
Service: Starfleet Service Date: 2401 - in Service )
Armaments: 26x Phaser Banks; 14x Point Phaser Emitters; 4x Fore and Aft Torpedo launchers
Speed: (Type 2 Scale) Warp 7.5 (Max Cruise), Warp 9 (at extreme risk)
I endorse Dr. McCoy's distaste for transporters and their unnatural “scrambling of molecules”.What gave you that idea, if I may ask? This being Star Trek, using shuttles and/or transporters is more in keeping with the setting. Since planet-wide transporter inhibitors are unpracticable, they use transporters for the most part and shuttles if that's not possible for XYZ reasons.
you don't have to completely jam them, just cause enough interference so it will be impossible to complete transport. and also planetwide isn't necessary, if you end up 200km from anywhere useful (and on foot) beaming over is little useI do not share that derision. Besides, planet-wide transporter jammers are impractical even with Trek tech.
essentially what it does is taking a body apart and reassemble it like it was previously.I endorse Dr. McCoy's distaste for transporters and their unnatural “scrambling of molecules”.
Especially if the Other Side uses jamming tactics against transporter frequencies.