Jonathan1997
Banned
Edward the iii did spend about 8 years I by fighting in Scotland I do believe that the kingdom of England have the resources to conquer the Scottish nobility.
They do not have to do it straight s way and if I remember the treaty correctly than France stated they would not fight the English for the next 20 yearsThe English have just gotten their asses handed to them by France, they aren't gonna declare war on a French ally (or declare war on a foreign state at all).
The auld alliance provides a legal loophole and doing so before shit hits the fan is impossible. The crown is heavily in debt.They do not have to do it straight s way and if I remember the treaty correctly than France stated they would not fight the English for the next 20 years
The auld alliance provides a legal loophole and doing so before shit hits the fan is impossible. The crown is heavily in debt.
Did not stop Henry V, Edward I and II and it was very common for mediaeval kings to be in debt. But I do take your point.The auld alliance provides a legal loophole and doing so before shit hits the fan is impossible. The crown is heavily in debt.
A pity that there are no radio stations in the Scottish border...Waging war on Scotland when they've given no reason to-James II's not actually done anything to invoke this-would be mental
Oooh now that’s somethingYou have given us the hint who this figure might be, I think that after this chapter it is not certain if Jack Dee is loyal to Queen Margaret
If is him as likely not really, he is just using her (and others) for provoking warYou have given us the hint who this figure might be, I think that after this chapter it is not certain if Jack Dee is loyal to Queen Margaret
If is him as likely not really, he is just using her (and others) for provoking war
Sure...Though then the question arises why does he want war. If it is indeed Dee.
Oooh now that’s something
If is him as likely not really, he is just using her (and others) for provoking war
Pretty unlikely as his actions had put both Warwick and Salisbury in great danger.Actions of the man in shadow fit him.
Or he works with Salisbury, because his action in this chapter aligns with Salisbury's goals.
And many other people.Actions of the man in shadow fit him.
Or he works with Salisbury, because his action in this chapter aligns with Salisbury's goals.
Exactly. I do not believe who Salisbury (or Warwick) would be either so stupid or so diabolical to be involved in thatAnd many other people.
Why would he (possibly) try to frame Salisbury if he's working with Salisbury?
And many other people.
Why would he (possibly) try to frame Salisbury if he's working with Salisbury?
Exactly. I do not believe who Salisbury (or Warwick) would be either so stupid or so diabolical to be involved in that
Uh, yeah, even if one believes Salisbury to be his accomplice, why would they agree to perform a sting operation on Salisbury rather than Somerset?To cause a war which Salisbury believe he would win. Salisbury is trying to push York to claim the crown.
I think both Salisbury and Warwick would be diabolical enough.
Exactly. Plus for me neither Salisbury or Warwick was so diabolical @Zygmunt Stary. If either Neville had been involved they would NOT be the ones framed but would try to damage the reputation of Somerset or someone close to himUh, yeah, even if one believes Salisbury to be his accomplice, why would they agree to perform a sting operation on Salisbury rather than Somerset?
And both father and son were IOTL "shocked" to see York place his hand on the throne (I personally attribute this to them not having foreknowledge of this, but still), and negotiated for York to succeed Henry. So, while they definitely want to see York and his line on the throne, they probably don't want a war out of it.
Debatable.
And both father and son were IOTL "shocked" to see York place
If either Neville had been involved they would NOT be the ones framed but would try to damage the reputation of Somerset or someone close to him