…The Nationalist Spring offensives kicked off in April and focused on the northern and southern portions of the front. In the north the goal was to crush the Popular Front pocket around Bilbao, in the South it was to take the Almeria region as a feint towards Cartagena so that the Popular Front would divert troops from Madrid.
The northern attack was completely successful, the Popular Front forces in that pocket had been cut off for many months and lacked the level of equipment found on the main line. Furthermore many of the Basque nationalist elements there decided that the Nationalists were better than the Communists running the Popular Front, thus General Mola found himself in possession of complete plans for the Popular Front defense of Bilbao while many forces assigned to defend it simply went home. Mola thus took the city by the end of June and ended the campaign there.
In the south things were less successful, while the region was taken by the end of June the Popular Front did not divert any reinforcements from the ongoing battle of Madrid. Furthermore the Popular front forces there did not attempt to stand and fight but used guerilla tactics to hit and fade while attacking Nationalist supply lines. The Almeria offensive was probably the worst performance by the Nationalists and the best of the Popular Front in the entire war, despite the Popular Front conceding territory…
…The Nationalist summer offensive began in August. Launched from the city of Teruel the target was the port of Castellón. Taking that city would cut the Popular Front remnants in half, any communications would be purely by sea and subject to interdiction by superior Nationalist naval and air forces. Thus Generals Sanjurjo, Franco and Mola all agreed that the Popular Front would have to defend against it, potentially at the cost of losing Madrid. The best nationalist units, including the Spanish foreign legion and the volunteers form Germany and Italy were thus concentrated to spearhead the offensive.
The gathering of forces by the Nationalist at Teruel was impossible to ignore and the Popular Front gathered the best troops they could spare from Madrid, along with their reserves of Soviet equipment to meet the coming thrust. The somewhat anarchic nature of the Popular Front prevented them from truly exploiting their advanced knowledge, as many groups refused to leave the ongoing fighting at Madrid for potential fighting at Teruel.
The Battle of Teruel began with large scale Nationalist air attacks on Popular Front positions, the German Dive Bombers of the Condor Legion being particularly effective. This was followed by a short hurricane bombardment then an armored advance. The Popular Front armored forces attempted to counter and the largest tank battle yet ensued. The Popular Front arguably had better tanks, their Soviet T-29’s were better than the Panzer III and L5/34 Tankettes that made up the majority of the modern Nationalist tank force. The Nationalists had far more tanks and much better coordination and were able to overcome the disadvantage and break through.
Truck mounted Nationalist infantry quickly exploited the breakthrough and held the shoulders of the breach with the help of artillery fire while tanks and armored cars raced ahead. On September 10th the Nationalists reached the sea, two days later Castellón fell. The Popular Front was cut in half and victory for the Nationalists was in sight. The fall of Castellón triggered many countries to begin officially recognizing the Nationalists as the legitimate government of Spain, presaging the fall of the Popular Front government…
…Following the first offensive from Teruel the Nationalists planned a second, aimed due west rather than east south east. The goal here was to take Madrid from behind, rather than face the lines of fortifications built up during the long stalemate. The October offensive quickly bogged down as the Popular Front through all available reserves at the thrust to preserve their capital. This was not enough to stop the Nationalist advance and General Franco’s troops continued to slowly grind forward. By October 25th they were able to place the last supply route to Madrid under long range artillery fire and the writing was on the wall. That Popular Front evacuated the city on November 1st, with Sanjurjo triumphally entering it on November 5th. Madrid had fallen and the Spanish Civil War was nearing its end…
-Excerpt from European Wars for Americans, Harper & Brothers, New York, 2004
…The Soviet T-29 infantry tank and BT-4 cavalry tanks had been major shocks to the Germans and Italians. Both mounted a 45mm gun more powerful than any tank mounted weapon they possessed and enough armor to be immune to rifle caliber AP bullets at anything over point blank range. Furthermore the BT-4 proved faster than anything they had in service while still being as well armored as their current tanks…
…For the Germans their Panzer III had always been a training model, meant to give their panzer divisions something to practice with given the unsuitability of the experimental Panzer I and II for mass production until future designs were ready. The T-29 and BT-2 merely convinced them to accelerate production of the stopgap Panzer IV and to try and accelerate development of the Panzer V Infantry Tank and Panzer VI cavalry tank. The specifications for the Panzer VI were further enhanced to require 70kph of speed, making an already ambitious project virtually impossible…
…The experience of the Spanish civil war convinced the Germans that while the 37mm was adequate, a better anti-tank gun would be needed relatively soon, despite the successful use of the 75 and 88mm Flak guns in the AT role…
…For the Italians the Spanish civil war showed that their assumptions about the unsuitability of larger tanks in mountainous terrain were false. The L5/34 with its 13.2mm gun was quickly modified into the L6/38 with a 20mm gun while development started on a new tank and a stopgap to precede it. Sanna was well aware that development would take time, as such he needed both a short term vehicle and a long term one. The M16/39 would mount a 47mm gun with armor and speed comparable to the T-29, while the M22/41 would mount a 65mm gun and much superior armor to match what the Soviets would be deploying by then.
The Italians did not attempt to develop a high speed tank to match the BT series. It was recognized that such a vehicle would require a large and powerful and thus expensive engine for its size, an engine better suited to either a more powerful tank or an aircraft. Instead the Italians determined that a cheaper armored car could do the same job in the areas they expected to fight in…
-Excerpt from Steel Talons: Armed Forces of the Interwar, Dewitt Publishing, Los Angeles, 2011