The problem is the exact PoD.Spread of Austronesian Sailing technology to South India would have interesting consequences.
The problem is the exact PoD.Spread of Austronesian Sailing technology to South India would have interesting consequences.
While keeping in mind that Burr was a controversial figure, he may be popular enough to keep support in 1804, if somehow elected in 1800. I believe it’d heavily depend on what happens during his first term. If his first term doesn’t turn out all that great, Burr may have to finagle to get re-election. If Burr avoids all controversy and manages a successful term, I don’t see why he wouldn’t be re-nominated. Burr forgoing his hatred for Hamilton would be a good step as well.If Aaron Burr were the victor of the 1800 election, how likely/unlikely is it that he would be the nominee in 1804? And if he wasn't, who would most likely be the choice in 1804 and 1808?
Easy.The problem is the exact PoD.
Alright!Easy.
Austronesians reach Indonesia and then Sri Lanka from there. Could be there by 1000 BC
If he weasals his way into victory in 1800, it would be essentially career suicide. Not only would he would have had to betray the party's head, Jefferson, to get the role, but he was also much too moderate to be the leader of the Democratic-Republicans at this time. He would have the animus of the South for both of these things, with Nathaniel Macon and John Randolph of Roanoke working against him in the House and Jefferson and Madison behind the scenes. George Clinton would likely leap at the opportunity to destroy an inter-state rival, and Albert Gallatin not only disliked Burr, but could likely see the writing on the wall about who was going to win the power struggle, so that would leave New York and Pennsylvania against Burr. Finally, John Breckinridge, the voice of the West, was a firm ally of Jefferson, so he would likely work to his utmost to limit Burr's influence and success.If Aaron Burr were the victor of the 1800 election, how likely/unlikely is it that he would be the nominee in 1804? And if he wasn't, who would most likely be the choice in 1804 and 1808?
I know this was true at times in England (and IIRC Scotland) because the government wanted to stimulate the wool industry but I'm not sure how true this was in other countries.Ran into a statement that during the Renaissance it was mandatory for men to wear hats in public, and you could get seriously fined for not doing so. Presumably if so this was for specific places and times, but is it broadly true? People certainly were fined for dressing "above their station", and women had to cover their sinful, sinful locks, but were men fined for exposing their pates to the public? Were hats so socially coded that by not wearing a rank-appropriate hat (at all) you were "out of uniform" and raising the grim specter of anarchy, cats living with dogs, etc?
Ran into a statement that during the Renaissance it was mandatory for men to wear hats in public, and you could get seriously fined for not doing so. Presumably if so this was for specific places and times, but is it broadly true? People certainly were fined for dressing "above their station", and women had to cover their sinful, sinful locks, but were men fined for exposing their pates to the public? Were hats so socially coded that by not wearing a rank-appropriate hat (at all) you were "out of uniform" and raising the grim specter of anarchy, cats living with dogs, etc?
If true.I know this was true at times in England (and IIRC Scotland) because the government wanted to stimulate the wool industry but I'm not sure how true this was in other countries.
Maria Christina is in a tough spot for a bit, since she's not the regent queen protecting the Bourbon line but instead a foreign lady exerting influence on the child king. . Who will be the wife of "Isabella"? Carlos will need to be content with regency. "Isabella" will still try to modernize Spain to debatable success.What if Isabella of Spain is born male? Would the Carlist Wars be butterflied? A more stable and prosperous Spain? How much power would the monarchy retain?
For what reason? She is still the Queen Regent of Spain, and her brother-in-law will not have reason for making damages aroundMaria Christina is in a tough spot for a bit, since she's not the regent queen protecting the Bourbon line but instead a foreign lady exerting influence on the child king. . Who will be the wife of "Isabella"? Carlos will need to be content with regency. "Isabella" will still try to modernize Spain to debatable success.
Because she won't be regent for "Isabella", she lacks legitimacy to do so ITTL. The liberals ITTL have a weaker position meaning she has less supportFor what reason? She is still the Queen Regent of Spain, and her brother-in-law will not have reason for making damages around
What made you believe that?Because she won't be regent for "Isabella", she lacks legitimacy to do so ITTL. The liberals ITTL have a weaker position meaning she has less support
The geography of Berber land?Why were the Berber languages so resistant to linguistic Romanization?