Talk about tempting fate...Ammunition ships: volcanoes
Talk about tempting fate...Ammunition ships: volcanoes
So a POD somewhere around 1776, then? 😁Pork hunting doesn't take over Congress so there is no need to name ships after Congresscritters favourite people to get funding?
Yeah, USN ship naming conventions are all kinds of jacked up. Destroyers, frigates and aircraft carriers are named for people. Submarines are named for cities, States, denizens of the deep and people. Cruisers are named for famous battles and people. And auxiliaries are all over the map with no rhyme or reason to their names
With the reply "at least we don't name ships after our Mothers in Law" - the RN ship was HMS Battleaxe.Reminds me of that bit in Red Storm Rising where the RN ask their USN counterparts ‘What the devil’s a ‘Reuben James’
With the reply "at least we don't name ships after our Mothers in Law" - the RN ship was HMS Battleaxe.
Yeah, it's ridiculous. I really wish they would go back to the old naming system. Go back to naming carriers things like Lexington, Yorktown, Hornet, Essex, Saratoga, Ranger, Constellation and Bon Homme RichardThe USN figured out real damn fast that it's very hard for politicians to cancel a ship named after a city in their state or after their state.
Even harder to cancel one named after a favorite member of their own party. It's gotten so ridiculous they are naming them after people who are still alive.
The excuse there is they name the assault ships that way but its just not the same...Yeah, it's ridiculous. I really wish they would go back to the old naming system. Go back to naming carriers things like Lexington, Yorktown, Hornet, Essex, Saratoga, Ranger, Constellation and Bon Homme Richard
It's not. The amphibs should be named after Marine battles like Tripoli, Guadalcanal, Iwo Jima, Belleau Wood, Montezuma, etc.The excuse there is they name the assault ships that way but its just not the same...
Yeah, USN ship naming conventions are all kinds of jacked up. Destroyers, frigates and aircraft carriers are named for people. Submarines are named for cities, States, denizens of the deep and people. Cruisers are named for famous battles and people. And auxiliaries are all over the map with no rhyme or reason to their names
Talk about tempting fate...
True. Dead link by the way.Royal Navy bomb ships back in the day had a similar tradition.
Ironically, it seems like it was only when they got sent off to freezing cold places that they met with disaster...
We don't talk about those ships here *scans nervously for a Californian omnivorous apex predator*Large Cruisers: insular areas and territories
True. Dead link by the way.
We don't talk about those ships here *scans nervously for a Californian omnivorous apex predator*
Maybe it's time to get a bit pagan and sacrifice the named person at commission to Wodin and his mob.... may reduce the amount of ego namingThe USN figured out real damn fast that it's very hard for politicians to cancel a ship named after a city in their state or after their state.
Even harder to cancel one named after a favorite member of their own party. It's gotten so ridiculous they are naming them after people who are still alive.
Honestly, I miss the days when the Navy used to name aircraft carriers after battles and Vespidae.
No offense to Doris Miller, who should have had a ship named after him before the war was even over. My beef is with the imperial presidency's annexation of our capital ship traditions.
Yeah, I'm still trying to figure that one out...At least Miller has been dead for a long time, how about the USS Gabrielle Giffords?
I mean at least Carl Vinson was the Navy's best friend in Congress for well over a decade and the ships he helped get procured were critical in WWIIAt least Miller has been dead for a long time, how about the USS Gabrielle Giffords?
At least Miller has been dead for a long time, how about the USS Gabrielle Giffords?