Actualyl, youre not uisng Susanoist mapping, but UCS mapping. In my map standard, the influenced countries would be outlined in the colour of the influencing nation - whereas in UCS mapping, they have the colour of the influencing nation but are outlined with their own (usually white) colour.
Which is what you have done, so, yeah, thats UCS, not Susanoism
In mid 1923, German, Ottoman, Romanian and Italian forces invade Austria-Hungary. The Germans invade the German-majority speaking areas and Bohemia. The Italians invade the Adriatic coast. The Romanians invade Bukovina and Transylvania. The Ottomans invade Bosnia. The Austrians are overwhelmed. By early 1924, the collapse of Austria-Hungary is complete.
Wait what? Why would Germany backstab its ally so its enemies gain land? Of course, Germany could intervene to salvage as much as still possible, but in this case I think the result would have been quite different. For one, I think they would have taken all of Cisleithania, including the Carniola (Slovenia, de facto), including access to the Adria (though not at the point where modern Slovenia has). And then, I dont think theyd allow Trnasylvania,with its sizeable Hungarian and German minorities to fall into Romanian hands. Same for the Voyvodina/Banat, really. And who would really stand up for Slovakian independance? I do think Hungary would more or less remain territorially intact, at worst lose Slovakia only (and that wouldnt even be all modern Slovakia as its south is Hungarian settled)
/E: Nevermind, read teh map wrong. Soem criciticisms stricken
Though I still do think in dividing the colonies GB gets a share hugaely advantageous to it, compared to Germanys...