Basically what it says on the tin. Can the Great Lakes region develop agriculture independently? They have a lot of potentially good crops, such as wild rice. If so, how will civilisation develop?
I know that I mean independently developing agriculture a la Mesoamerica and the Andes.Could you elaborate on what you mean by "develop agriculture"? The Native Americans did use agricultural techniques. They didn't simply forage for food.
You might be interested on this thread of @Alexander Helios
You better the fact that timeline dead was a big let down. I was very excited for it.Damn yeah that thread exists, didn’t get very far though (I swear, I’ll reboot it one day)
IIRC, Mesoamericans never adapted the potato, and I think its impossible for the eastern woodlands to do so. Maybe this can be an alternative?The Copper in the Upper Peninsula and, later, the iron in the Mesabi range of Minnesota could be a big boon, should this culture develop metal working. There are also clay deposits throughout the region as well. As for crops: corn was brought into the region in OTL - the furthest north corn field has been discovered in the region is near the border of the UP and Wisconsin, northeast of Marinette/Menominee. As others have pointed out, wild rice is native to the region and a good candidate for (further) cultivation. A weird through, cranberries are also native as well, and also grow in wet, boglike conditions: could we see cranberry and wildrice being cultivated using similar techniques? Not sure in the least how realistic that is, but it would be interesting.
Potatoes, for that matter grow well in the sandy soil of the northwoods: though I'm not it would be plausible for those to be traed that far north from their native habitat. Did the Mesoamerican cultures adopt the potato by trade withthe Andes?
As near as I can tell in my research, no. The last time this was discussed, @Revachah pointed out that it's unlikely for potatoes to make the voyage that far north, as direct travel is exceedingly unlikely and potatoes are not superior to indigenous crops in the tropical land between North America and the Andes (they would have to be planted in the discontinuous savannah climates where cassava and sweet potatoes are already well established and better suited). This was very frustrating for me because I *want* it to be possible, but they are correct that it is unlikely.Potatoes, for that matter grow well in the sandy soil of the northwoods: though I'm not it would be plausible for those to be traed that far north from their native habitat. Did the Mesoamerican cultures adopt the potato by trade withthe Andes?
The usual candidate we've discussed in the past are Moose as a pseudo-Water Buffalo.And I think that as aquaculture rises, we may see some altmestications? Domesticated minks, anyone?
This could be good, a group in either India or Bangladesh have trained otters to herd fish into nets. Doubles their catch even with having to feed them fish.because they're diet is predominately things like fish,
Is this not similar to most of Eurasia? Europe had large-scale agricultural society but doesn't seem to have developed Egyptian or Mesopotamian-like civilizations, for example.I thought you meant the Great Lakes of Africa for a moment LOL.
There was a timeline that explored the POD of domesticating wild rice which should be good for you to look at.
As for what how these societies would develop, I don't think that we'd see centralized societies rising up in the wake of agriculture like in Egypt or Mesopotamia. The Eastern Woodlands are very wet and fertile, and there's plenty of places to grow rice, so the farming population would not be stuck in one river valley, creating a surplus labor force.
I guess, but colour me skeptical of its utility (and success) on a large scale. The bigger issue is that it isn't useful for aquaculture. In an aquaculture environment you don't need to herd fish, you just drain the pond and collect them. When combined in a polyculture with an aquatic plant like zizania (or rice OTL), you drain at harvest time and get two harvests; one rice, one fish. The issue with mink or otters is that they're eating your eventual meal (the fish and crayfish). Muskrats, when introduced after the crop establishes in the season, aren't diminishing zizania yields, instead they're eating other plants - weeds. They're opportunistic omnivores, so they'll take some snails and crayfish occasionally, but those are both pretty negligible as a whole. Mink and otter are also bird predators, unlike Muskrats, which means they can't be around your ducks who almost certainly will be in the paddies as well. The real problem with Mustelids isn't that they can't be useful, its just that they conflict with most forms of aquaculture that are likely to be practiced and their biggest niche (fur farming) is covered equally well by muskies.This could be good, a group in either India or Bangladesh have trained otters to herd fish into nets. Doubles their catch even with having to feed them fish.
And you can find videos on Youtube of a guy who trained a mink to fish for him.